Monday, October 23, 2006

Why ISLAMISTS vote for Democrats

Treason doesn't pay in the long term, as shown below about the New York Times, but hopeful, anti-West Moslems in the USA, encouraged by the Mullahs and Islamist movements overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. The video helps shows why. And why Americans should know better than to fall into the same trap and commit virtual suicide if they vote the Democrats into power. CLICK ON TITLE TO VIEW VIDEO The New York Times Co. reported Thursday that its third-quarter 2006 profit from continuing operations plunged 39.2%. At the New York Times Co., 3Q operating profit was down 48% from the same period in 2005 to $20.5 million on total revenues. The Times Co. said it earned $14 million, or 10 cents per share, compared with $23.1 milion, or 16 cents per share, in the third quarter of 2005. Advertising revenues decreased 5.1% and circulation revenues were down 1.3%. Of course, they'll blame everything else and anything else, but we know the truth.
++++++++++++++++
An interesting opinion posted by a visitor to this site which addresses the Moslem or "fifth column" misdirected support. Dear Alan: As a novice in politics and an Iranian-American who doesn't want to have to live under Sharia again here in the West, to my horror and dismay, I have to admit that the academia in the US/West is infested with these so called ME's experts and pundists. UC Berkely is one of these cesspools who breeds and blindly accepts these mullah-zadehs (bacheh mullah) with scholarships from the IRI. They are more numerous in Canada than in the USA. They've been either bought by the IRI or they are truly jihadist brainwashed by their Islamic upbringing and and have become useful and dangerous tools and potential cells. The number of American/Western born "scholars" or Academics/journalists who peddle the IRI's agenda is also skyrocketting. I think one the recent recruits by the "Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution" (i.e. Supreme council of manufactured propaganda against Western Democracies" is no other than Ms. Yvonne Ridely whose op-ed was recently published by the moronic WaPo. This woman calls the suicide bombers, Shahids. (Homicide bombers being called "martyrs"?) Another potential recent (not so recent) recruit is Scott Ridder. ( Alan's note: Wasn't he the one supporting Saddam Hussein and advocating NOT to attack and remove him? He was apparently recently in Iran and came back to write a Pro-Mullah book! This leopard does not change his spots) This other journalist, I think his last name is Vick is another pocketbook sympathizer. The old ones are Gary Sick, Carter et al.and Mr. Royce over at ineffectual/worthless VOA who wastes US taxpayer's money on promoting the IRI agenda instead of US's under our nose and so on. The IRI spends millions of dollars each year to lobby the US/Western-born or Iranian-born journalists, policy makers, and scholars. They are all disgusting and make my blood boil.
at

3 comments:

  1. serendip11:26 AM

    Have you seen this?

    http://www.iranian.com/Noghrekar/2006/October/Psych/index.html

    Amil Imani has an outstanding article regarding the upcoming elections. He is one of the good Iranian-Americans...LOL

    http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&Itemid=2

    I think America is about to repeat the same mistake they committed in the 70's when they elected Carter and we all have seen the disatrous fall out of that fiasco all too well and we're paying for to this date.

    ReplyDelete
  2. serendip9:18 AM

    The truly transparnet IRI agent in Canada, Hossein Derakhshan, on CBC.com spreading lies and disinformation. He should be stopped. He was invited to Ahmadinejad gala dinner in NY.

    http://www.cbc.ca/thehour/video.php?mode=w&save=1&id=1113

    ReplyDelete
  3. serendip10:55 AM

    Who is this guy? Is he on the IRI's payroll?

    Simon Tisdall:
    ..“US and Iran have many common interests in Iraq. Tehran, like Washington, is keenly interested in avoiding a civil war and sustaining Iraq as a unitary state ... An Iraqi-Iranian-American dialogue could eventually provide a foundation for new security architecture in the Gulf," they said.

    These new structures might include mutual security guarantees, enhanced regional cooperation and arms control pacts and could provide the impetus for an historic settlement of the Arab-Israel conflict. That in turn would help stabilise fragile regimes from Cairo to Riyadh to Kabul while assuaging the west’s terrorism and proliferation concerns...

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/ worldb...1930453,00.html

    What planet does he live in? The Baker's "Iraq Study Group" is going to recommend talking to Iran and Syria after the November elections?

    Here is what I wrote regarding this issue in response to Daniel Mendel over at hnn.us/blog, "Dangerous Diplomacy":

    "The same mistake is about to be repeated by Baker et al regarding Iran and Iraq via "Iraq Study Group" who is about to make it's recommendation after the 2006 mid-term election(garbage in-garbage out)who have consulted and bought the highly placed IRI's lobbyist/agents and so called "Iran experts's" propaganda systematically placed and peddled in US Academia for many years now and funded by the Islamic Republic--some are trained and mentored by Carter and Brezienski et al(see Iran NIAC's group, Trita Parsi) and many others who are either sympathizer of the Islamic Republic or potentially on the Islamic Republic's Payroll)

    http://globalpolitician.com/arti...65&;cid=2&sid=4

    Professor AmirAhmadi:
    Houshang Amir Ahmadi, as Kenneth Timmerman says in his latest book, always defends the mad mullahs at any given time and wants the US to have talks with the illegitimate regime of Iran. He is, as Timmerman says, a former member of communist party of Iran.

    http://www.amirahmadi.org/pages/...ges/php/ bio.php

    Prof.Dabashi of Columbia University:
    http:// www.littlegreenfootballs....mbia_University

    Trita Parsi:He wrote his Doctoral thesis on Israeli-Iranian relations under Professor Francis Fukuyama (and Drs. Zbigniew Brzezinski, R. K. Ramazani, Jakub Grygiel, Charles Doran) at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies in 2006. Very intersting character who seems to be in constant contact with the IRI:
    http://www.tritaparsi.com/biography.htm


    Daniel Mandel

    DANGEROUS DIPLOMACY
    By Daniel Mendel
    North Korea's announcement that it has conducted a nuclear test has left some people wondering why diplomacy was not put to good use in time. The Australian is to be commended for reproducing an excerpt of a 1994 CNN interview with former US President Jimmy Carter which provides an answer. It was Carter who negotiated that year a freeze in North Korea's nuclear weapons programme at President Clinton's behest, following North Korea's expulsion of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Carter obtained North Korean agreement to stop reprocessing spent nuclear fuel in exchange for US oil and light water reactors. These were then simply pocketed while the North Korean programme proceeded unhindered to its present apparent state of completion. Today, Jimmy Carter has a Nobel Peace Prize and North Korea, in all probability, a nuclear weapon - a happy division of achievement for all concerned. Note therefore the moral of the story drawn by Carter at the time, if only as a cautionary example of hubris:


    CARTER: What the North Koreans were waiting for was some treatment of their exalted leader with respect and a direct communication. I didn't have to argue with him. When I outlined the specific points that were the Clinton administration's position, I presented them to him. And with very little equivocation, he agreed. I think it's all roses now. I've known that there were people in Washington who were sceptical about any direct dealing with the North Koreans. They were already condemned as outlaws. Kim Il-sung was already condemned a criminal.
    QUESTION: Are you absolutely convinced that the North Koreans are going to honour this agreement, that while talks are going on that it's not just a matter of buying time on the part of the North Koreans, that they will not secretly pursue the nuclear program they were pushing earlier?
    CARTER: I'm convinced. But I said this when I got back from North Korea, and people said that I was naive or gullible and so forth. I don't think I was. In my opinion, this was one of those perfect agreements where both sides won. We should not ever avoid direct talks, direct conversations, direct discussions and negotiations with the main person in a despised or misunderstood or condemned society who can actually resolve the issue."

    http://hnn.us/blogs/comments/30777.html#comment


    I can almost guarantee you if you contact the Baker's study group and ask for the list of Iranian experts they have consulted with to generate their "Iraq study report and recommnedations", the names above mentioned are going to be on the list. I have a strong suspicion that the Left in the US is complicit in propping these so called reformist and moderate voices of Islamic Republic. The mullahs have fooled Carter et al before and they are fooling them now. Hasn't carter et al done enough in creating militant Islam? When is the left ever going to learn? Why do we have to pay for their ignorance and cluelessness?

    ReplyDelete