INVITATION DEFINITELY NOT COMING TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
With Her Majesty’s reported orders about Michelle Obama, I cannot see the Obama clan risking the certain indignity of “arriving” uninvited.
(As some apparently think they might WANT to try)
Good and gracious manners still count for a lot in worldwide high society (little of it to still be found in the USA as we are not socially structured along the classical paths and our “high society” is not based on long standing family background, education, service to our country and cultural upbringing but our "nobility" or "upper class" is based on how much money they have in the bank or happen to be an unpolished, sometimes barely educated but popular movie, sports or music star.
(Or a lying, thuggish, CLUELESS Community Organizer (now millionaire), whom even Venezuela's thug, Hugo Chavez, verbally disrespects and Iran's Ahmadi-Nejad mocks in a speech as "not knowing his own name". Low life seems an appropriate characterization.
AND NOW THE SUPREME COURT IS TAKING ANOTHER LOOK AT HIS RIGHT TO OCCUPY THE WHITE HOUSE!
===============================================
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
No comments:
Post a Comment