Union workers admits being paid by Coakley camp…but he’ll vote for Brown
By Michelle Malkin
I printed an e-mail from a reader I received yesterday about union workers with Coakley signs standing outside the UMass debate venue. The e-mail reported: ” While speaking with one of the union guys holding the Coakley sign, he admitted that his union was paying him $50 to stand and hold the sign. I was blown away, I always thought that these guys were out in the cold like us, doing what we thought was the right thing to do, not that they were actually being paid a fee to do it. The best part was when he admitted that although he was there because he needed the money, he was voting for Scott!!”
Now, there’s video. The union guy is wearing a Sheet Metal Workers shirt from Local 17. Love how he says, “Shhhh:”
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
HORRIBLE, (MAFIOSA) PELOSI
Mafiosa minded Congress Speaker Pelosi fits right in with the Chicago thuggery imported into Washington D.C. by the Obama House and wastes our tax money on a Copenhagen junket, while Senate majority Leader Harry Reid misuses our TAXPAYER money to bribe Democrats to vote in his favor. (Evidencing his hanged horse rustler great-uncle mindsets).
Monday, January 11, 2010
PONZI SCHEME: FEDERAL GOVT. BOUGHT SOME 80% OF 2009 US TREASURY BONDS
Ponzi Scheme: The Federal Reserve Bought Approximately 80 Percent Of U.S. Treasury Securities Issued In 2009
No, the headline is not a misprint.
According to CNBC, the Federal Reserve bought approximately 80 percent of the U.S. Treasury securities issued in 2009. In other words, the Federal Reserve has been gobbling up the massive tsunami of U.S. government debt that has been created over the past year. This is absolutely unprecedented, and it is yet another clear indication that the U.S. financial system is on the verge of a major economic collapse.
You see, the Federal Reserve is not part of the federal government. In fact, the Federal Reserve is about as "federal" as Federal Express is.
The Federal Reserve is a private bank owned and operated for profit by a very powerful group of elite international bankers.
It is this private central bank that controls the money supply and the issuance of currency in the United States.
When the U.S. government need to borrow more money (which happens a lot) they go over to the Federal Reserve and they ask them for some more green pieces of paper called Federal Reserve Notes.
The Federal Reserve swaps these green pieces of paper for pink pieces of paper called U.S. Treasury bonds.
Now normally the Federal Reserve takes these U.S. Treasury bonds and they sell them all to other buyers.
But in 2009 there were not nearly enough buyers.
So in 2009 the Federal Reserve sold itself about 80 percent of this debt.
This is even being admitted on CNBC. The video below is from January 8th, and at the 1:45 mark CNBC anchor Erin Burnett drops this bombshell along with a comment about how it is a Ponzi scheme....
So why is it a Ponzi scheme?
Well, basically the Federal Reserve is creating money out of nothing, loaning it to the U.S. government and then collecting interest on the loan.
That is nice work if you can get it.
But also, this intervention by the Federal Reserve is keeping interest rates on U.S. Treasury bonds artificially low.
In a true "free market" situation, the interest rates on U.S. treasuries would rise to reflect the rapidly declining economic situation in this nation.
Due to the massive explosion in the size of the U.S. government debt and due to the very weak U.S. economy, interest rates on U.S. treasuries should have shot through the roof by now. Rational investors would normally require an increased return for the increased risk that U.S. treasuries now represent.
But that is not happening.
Instead when there are no buyers for U.S. treasuries at current interest rates, the Federal Reserve just steps in and buys up all the excess bonds that need to be purchased.
But in a normal free market situation, interest rates would rise on U.S. treasuries until they would be attractive enough for investors to buy them all.
However, that would create some huge problems.
If the U.S. government was not able to borrow all of the money it wanted to at artificially low interest rates, the results would be absolutely disastrous.
Much higher interest rates on U.S. government debt would cause the U.S. federal budget deficit to absolutely explode. Interest rates on everything else throughout the economy would also skyrocket. As mortgage rates climbed dramatically, the housing market would completely collapse. The U.S. economy would be totally in flames.
But for now (and this situation cannot last forever) the Federal Reserve is keeping interest rates artificially low by lending the U.S. government as much money as it wants at extremely low interest rates. Of course the Federal Reserve is making an insane amount of money out of the arrangement, so it is working out quite nicely for them as well.
But by essentially "printing" a flood of cheap money for the U.S. government to borrow, the Federal Reserve is ultimately going to end up destroying the value of the U.S. dollar.
Every fiat currency throughout history has always ended up losing its value, and that is exactly what is going to happen this time too. The only way to protect the buying power of your money is to put it into something that will hold value (like gold or silver). Your dollars are never going to be worth more than they are today.
The actions taken by the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have guaranteed the demise of the U.S. dollar. At this point it is unavoidable. It is only a matter of how soon it will happen and how bad it will be as things play out.
You better get ready.
No, the headline is not a misprint.
According to CNBC, the Federal Reserve bought approximately 80 percent of the U.S. Treasury securities issued in 2009. In other words, the Federal Reserve has been gobbling up the massive tsunami of U.S. government debt that has been created over the past year. This is absolutely unprecedented, and it is yet another clear indication that the U.S. financial system is on the verge of a major economic collapse.
You see, the Federal Reserve is not part of the federal government. In fact, the Federal Reserve is about as "federal" as Federal Express is.
The Federal Reserve is a private bank owned and operated for profit by a very powerful group of elite international bankers.
It is this private central bank that controls the money supply and the issuance of currency in the United States.
When the U.S. government need to borrow more money (which happens a lot) they go over to the Federal Reserve and they ask them for some more green pieces of paper called Federal Reserve Notes.
The Federal Reserve swaps these green pieces of paper for pink pieces of paper called U.S. Treasury bonds.
Now normally the Federal Reserve takes these U.S. Treasury bonds and they sell them all to other buyers.
But in 2009 there were not nearly enough buyers.
So in 2009 the Federal Reserve sold itself about 80 percent of this debt.
This is even being admitted on CNBC. The video below is from January 8th, and at the 1:45 mark CNBC anchor Erin Burnett drops this bombshell along with a comment about how it is a Ponzi scheme....
So why is it a Ponzi scheme?
Well, basically the Federal Reserve is creating money out of nothing, loaning it to the U.S. government and then collecting interest on the loan.
That is nice work if you can get it.
But also, this intervention by the Federal Reserve is keeping interest rates on U.S. Treasury bonds artificially low.
In a true "free market" situation, the interest rates on U.S. treasuries would rise to reflect the rapidly declining economic situation in this nation.
Due to the massive explosion in the size of the U.S. government debt and due to the very weak U.S. economy, interest rates on U.S. treasuries should have shot through the roof by now. Rational investors would normally require an increased return for the increased risk that U.S. treasuries now represent.
But that is not happening.
Instead when there are no buyers for U.S. treasuries at current interest rates, the Federal Reserve just steps in and buys up all the excess bonds that need to be purchased.
But in a normal free market situation, interest rates would rise on U.S. treasuries until they would be attractive enough for investors to buy them all.
However, that would create some huge problems.
If the U.S. government was not able to borrow all of the money it wanted to at artificially low interest rates, the results would be absolutely disastrous.
Much higher interest rates on U.S. government debt would cause the U.S. federal budget deficit to absolutely explode. Interest rates on everything else throughout the economy would also skyrocket. As mortgage rates climbed dramatically, the housing market would completely collapse. The U.S. economy would be totally in flames.
But for now (and this situation cannot last forever) the Federal Reserve is keeping interest rates artificially low by lending the U.S. government as much money as it wants at extremely low interest rates. Of course the Federal Reserve is making an insane amount of money out of the arrangement, so it is working out quite nicely for them as well.
But by essentially "printing" a flood of cheap money for the U.S. government to borrow, the Federal Reserve is ultimately going to end up destroying the value of the U.S. dollar.
Every fiat currency throughout history has always ended up losing its value, and that is exactly what is going to happen this time too. The only way to protect the buying power of your money is to put it into something that will hold value (like gold or silver). Your dollars are never going to be worth more than they are today.
The actions taken by the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have guaranteed the demise of the U.S. dollar. At this point it is unavoidable. It is only a matter of how soon it will happen and how bad it will be as things play out.
You better get ready.
UNVERIFIED - INTERESTING - UNLIKELY - YET POSSIBLE
COMMENT:
NIAC is a pro-Mullah REGIME organization and must be in a bit of a panic. If this passes their whole network of operatives will be dismantled, including the ones ensconced in mosques, permanent students at universities (in fact intelligence agents of Iran) and will shut down their current ebb and flow of operational travel in and out of the USA.
And remove a source of jihadi recruiting when a large swathe of potential support terrorists disappears.
I feel sorry for some very anti-Mullah regime Iranians who reside in the USA and may well get burned in this intense flame but............. who knows what will happen - if anything.
Cannot see pro-Mullah regime, pro-terrorist, Oba-Hussein-Khomeini signing this bill or anything like it into law.
On the other hand, Saudis are exempted so maybe their increasing quarrel with Iran and Yemen and influence over Oba-Hussein might end up persuading him to do so.
What will happen to HAMAS and Hezbollah, who are not mentioned directly?
Also, what happens in Islamic Iran on January 15/16 may have an effect on this.
Congressman Introducing Legislation to Bar and Deport Iranians from U.S.
By David Elliott,
National Iranian American Council (NIAC)
Congressman Gresham Barrett (R-SC) has announced his intention to reintroduce legislation that would prohibit "the admission of aliens from countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism as well as Yemen to the United States." The Stop Terrorist Entry Program (STEP) Act, first introduced in 2003, also would have required all persons from these countries on student visas, temporary work visas, exchange and tourist visas to leave the United States within 60 days, despite their legal status in the country. Residents and nationals of Iran, Cuba, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be affected.
The bill makes an exception only in the cases of individuals who are seeking political or religious asylum, or who have immediate emergency medical needs.
Congressman Barrett said his bill came in response to the Fort Hood shooting and the Christmas-day attempt to blow up an airplane over Detroit. "While President Obama may have declared an end to the War on Terror, it is clear our enemies did not get the message. Twice in the past two months, radical Islamic terrorists have attacked our nation and the Administration has failed to adapt its national security and immigration policies to counter the renewed resolve of those who seek to harm our citizens."
The American Army major and Nigerian alleged to have committed those attacks would not have been affected by the STEP Act.
In response to Barrett's announcement, the National Iranian American Council has launched a campaign against the bill, saying it is "offensive to American principles, harmful to US interests, and discriminates against Iranians and Iranian Americans." The group also noted that no Iranian has ever committed a terrorist act on American soil.
The 2003 version of the bill is available online. Congressman Barrett's office did not respond to requests for comment. Aside from the inclusion of Yemen, and a new provision to prohibit the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo Bay prison to the United States, Congressman Barrett has not indicated any further differences between his new bill and the legislation he introduced in 2003.
ORIGINAL BILL TEXT
108TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 3075
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar the admission of
aliens from countries determined to be state sponsors of terrorism, and
for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 11, 2003
Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar the
admission of aliens from countries determined to be state
sponsors of terrorism, and for other purposes.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Terrorist Entry
5 Program Act of 2003’’.
6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF NATIONALS OF STATE SPONSORS
7 OF TERRORISM.
8 (a) IN GENERAL.—
2
•HR 3075 IH
1 (1) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 9 of title II of the
2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1351 et
3 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following
4 new section:
5 ‘‘TREATMENT OF NATIONALS OF STATE SPONSORS OF
6 TERRORISM
7 ‘‘SEC. 295. (a) IN GENERAL.—No nonimmigrant or
8 immigrant visa may be issued, or nonimmigrant or immi9
grant status otherwise provided, other than a visa or sta10
tus described in section 101(a)(15)(A) or 201(b)(2)(A)(i),
11 to any alien who is a national of, or residing in, a country
12 that is determined to be a state sponsor of terrorism,
13 except the Secretary of Homeland Security (or the consular
14 officer, in the case of an application for a visa) may, on
15 a case-by-case basis, waive the application of this sub16
section in the case of an alien who—
17 ‘‘(1) requires examination or treatment for an
18 emergency medical condition (as defined in section
19 562(d) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immi20
gration Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C.
21 1396(d))); or
22 ‘‘(2) is eligible for admission as a refugee under
23 section 207 or for asylum under section 208.
24 ‘‘(b) STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM DEFINED.—
25 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section, the term
26 ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ means any country the
3
•HR 3075 IH
1 government of which has been determined by the
2 Secretary of State under any of the laws specified in
3 paragraph (2) to have repeatedly provided support
4 for acts of terrorism. Such term shall apply to a
5 country beginning on the date on which such deter6
mination takes effect and ending on the date on
7 which such determination is withdrawn, terminated,
8 revoked, or otherwise ceases to be effective.
9 ‘‘(2) LAWS UNDER WHICH DETERMINATIONS
10 WERE MADE.—The laws specified in this paragraph
11 are the following:
12 ‘‘(A) Section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Ad13
ministration Act of 1979 (or successor statute).
14 ‘‘(B) Section 40(d) of the Arms Export
15 Control Act.
16 ‘‘(C) Section 620A(a) of the Foreign As17
sistance Act of 1961.’’.
18 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con19
tents of the Immigration and Nationality Act is
20 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec21
tion 294 the following:
‘‘295. Treatment of nationals of state sponsors of terrorism.’’.
22 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made
23 by this subsection shall take effect on the date of the
24 enactment of this Act and shall apply to visas
25 issued, or status provided, on and after such date.
4
•HR 3075 IH
1 (b) APPLICATION TO ADMITTED NONIMMIGRANTS.—
2 In the case of a nonimmigrant alien lawfully admitted into
3 the United States who would have been ineligible to be
4 granted such nonimmigrant status if the amendments
5 made by subsection (a) had been in effect on the date on
6 which such status was granted, notwithstanding any other
7 provision of law, the period of authorized admission as
8 such a nonimmigrant shall terminate 60 days after the
9 date of the enactment of this Act, unless the Secretary
10 of Homeland Security makes an individualized determina11
tion described in section 295(a) of the Immigration and
12 Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a)) with respect
13 to the alien.
14 (c) REPEAL.—Section 306 of the Enhanced Border
15 Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (Public Law
16 107–173) is repealed.
Æ
NIAC is a pro-Mullah REGIME organization and must be in a bit of a panic. If this passes their whole network of operatives will be dismantled, including the ones ensconced in mosques, permanent students at universities (in fact intelligence agents of Iran) and will shut down their current ebb and flow of operational travel in and out of the USA.
And remove a source of jihadi recruiting when a large swathe of potential support terrorists disappears.
I feel sorry for some very anti-Mullah regime Iranians who reside in the USA and may well get burned in this intense flame but............. who knows what will happen - if anything.
Cannot see pro-Mullah regime, pro-terrorist, Oba-Hussein-Khomeini signing this bill or anything like it into law.
On the other hand, Saudis are exempted so maybe their increasing quarrel with Iran and Yemen and influence over Oba-Hussein might end up persuading him to do so.
What will happen to HAMAS and Hezbollah, who are not mentioned directly?
Also, what happens in Islamic Iran on January 15/16 may have an effect on this.
=======================
Congressman Introducing Legislation to Bar and Deport Iranians from U.S.
By David Elliott,
National Iranian American Council (NIAC)
Congressman Gresham Barrett (R-SC) has announced his intention to reintroduce legislation that would prohibit "the admission of aliens from countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism as well as Yemen to the United States." The Stop Terrorist Entry Program (STEP) Act, first introduced in 2003, also would have required all persons from these countries on student visas, temporary work visas, exchange and tourist visas to leave the United States within 60 days, despite their legal status in the country. Residents and nationals of Iran, Cuba, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be affected.
The bill makes an exception only in the cases of individuals who are seeking political or religious asylum, or who have immediate emergency medical needs.
Congressman Barrett said his bill came in response to the Fort Hood shooting and the Christmas-day attempt to blow up an airplane over Detroit. "While President Obama may have declared an end to the War on Terror, it is clear our enemies did not get the message. Twice in the past two months, radical Islamic terrorists have attacked our nation and the Administration has failed to adapt its national security and immigration policies to counter the renewed resolve of those who seek to harm our citizens."
The American Army major and Nigerian alleged to have committed those attacks would not have been affected by the STEP Act.
In response to Barrett's announcement, the National Iranian American Council has launched a campaign against the bill, saying it is "offensive to American principles, harmful to US interests, and discriminates against Iranians and Iranian Americans." The group also noted that no Iranian has ever committed a terrorist act on American soil.
The 2003 version of the bill is available online. Congressman Barrett's office did not respond to requests for comment. Aside from the inclusion of Yemen, and a new provision to prohibit the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo Bay prison to the United States, Congressman Barrett has not indicated any further differences between his new bill and the legislation he introduced in 2003.
ORIGINAL BILL TEXT
108TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 3075
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar the admission of
aliens from countries determined to be state sponsors of terrorism, and
for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 11, 2003
Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar the
admission of aliens from countries determined to be state
sponsors of terrorism, and for other purposes.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Terrorist Entry
5 Program Act of 2003’’.
6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF NATIONALS OF STATE SPONSORS
7 OF TERRORISM.
8 (a) IN GENERAL.—
2
•HR 3075 IH
1 (1) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 9 of title II of the
2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1351 et
3 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following
4 new section:
5 ‘‘TREATMENT OF NATIONALS OF STATE SPONSORS OF
6 TERRORISM
7 ‘‘SEC. 295. (a) IN GENERAL.—No nonimmigrant or
8 immigrant visa may be issued, or nonimmigrant or immi9
grant status otherwise provided, other than a visa or sta10
tus described in section 101(a)(15)(A) or 201(b)(2)(A)(i),
11 to any alien who is a national of, or residing in, a country
12 that is determined to be a state sponsor of terrorism,
13 except the Secretary of Homeland Security (or the consular
14 officer, in the case of an application for a visa) may, on
15 a case-by-case basis, waive the application of this sub16
section in the case of an alien who—
17 ‘‘(1) requires examination or treatment for an
18 emergency medical condition (as defined in section
19 562(d) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immi20
gration Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C.
21 1396(d))); or
22 ‘‘(2) is eligible for admission as a refugee under
23 section 207 or for asylum under section 208.
24 ‘‘(b) STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM DEFINED.—
25 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section, the term
26 ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ means any country the
3
•HR 3075 IH
1 government of which has been determined by the
2 Secretary of State under any of the laws specified in
3 paragraph (2) to have repeatedly provided support
4 for acts of terrorism. Such term shall apply to a
5 country beginning on the date on which such deter6
mination takes effect and ending on the date on
7 which such determination is withdrawn, terminated,
8 revoked, or otherwise ceases to be effective.
9 ‘‘(2) LAWS UNDER WHICH DETERMINATIONS
10 WERE MADE.—The laws specified in this paragraph
11 are the following:
12 ‘‘(A) Section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Ad13
ministration Act of 1979 (or successor statute).
14 ‘‘(B) Section 40(d) of the Arms Export
15 Control Act.
16 ‘‘(C) Section 620A(a) of the Foreign As17
sistance Act of 1961.’’.
18 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con19
tents of the Immigration and Nationality Act is
20 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec21
tion 294 the following:
‘‘295. Treatment of nationals of state sponsors of terrorism.’’.
22 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made
23 by this subsection shall take effect on the date of the
24 enactment of this Act and shall apply to visas
25 issued, or status provided, on and after such date.
4
•HR 3075 IH
1 (b) APPLICATION TO ADMITTED NONIMMIGRANTS.—
2 In the case of a nonimmigrant alien lawfully admitted into
3 the United States who would have been ineligible to be
4 granted such nonimmigrant status if the amendments
5 made by subsection (a) had been in effect on the date on
6 which such status was granted, notwithstanding any other
7 provision of law, the period of authorized admission as
8 such a nonimmigrant shall terminate 60 days after the
9 date of the enactment of this Act, unless the Secretary
10 of Homeland Security makes an individualized determina11
tion described in section 295(a) of the Immigration and
12 Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a)) with respect
13 to the alien.
14 (c) REPEAL.—Section 306 of the Enhanced Border
15 Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (Public Law
16 107–173) is repealed.
Æ
Saturday, January 09, 2010
CALL TO STOP DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY! ACCIDENTALLY OR ON PURPOSE
American protests escalating openly? Are we gradually being forced to follow in Iran protesters' MENTALITY/footsteps because we have an Oba-Hussein-Khomeini of our own? Ruining our country just as the Ayatollah did in Islamic Iran?
It took them 30-years. Are Americans as patient? What might trigger confrontation instead of protest?
Truly, I have no idea.
It took them 30-years. Are Americans as patient? What might trigger confrontation instead of protest?
Truly, I have no idea.
SENATOR'S AIDE - YOU (THE PEOPLE) ARE NOT PAYING MY SALARY!!!
WHY THEY MUST BE VOTED OUT OF POWER (January 18th) - they openly show their mindset, caught ON CAMERA, they do NOT work for "us the people". Even the President of the USA is supposed to work for us but turns a deaf ear on what we want or more accurately refuses to hear what WE DO NOT WANT!
OBA-HUSSEIN NATIONALITY SCANDAL GOING WORLDWIDE
There have been rumbles of unrest around the world regarding Obama’s nationality since the day he stated he would run for the presidency. Now, after more than a year as president of the USA, the rumbles have turned into a full on eruption.
The Barack Obama nationality scandal is refusing to burn itself out and seems to be gathering even more speed with Congressman Nathan Deal questioning the eligibility of Obama to hold the presidency. This is the first time in history that a serving president has been questioned about eligibility by a member of congress.
Over the last week the internet has been reporting this story with the blogosphere almost going into meltdown over the latest developments yet no mainstream media seem interested in the story that just won’t go away for Obama.
Congressman Deal asked the president to prove that he is legally entitled to hold the presidency electronically on December 1st 2009. This communication was confirmed received by Obama’s staff but has yet to be responded to.
Even though the president has already produced his (ALLEGED) short-form birth certificate in order to stop these questions, he has spent a large amount of taxpayers money (estimated to be more than two million dollars) ensuring that the long-form certificate is kept from the public – an action that has raised more than a few eyebrows along the way.
Throughout the campaign trail and longer, Obama made promises of the most transparent administration than any other so why the need to hide a simple birth certificate? Many claim that the whole situation is a complete waste of time and distracting but supporters of the question refuse to stop asking more and more questions.
It seems that the original question seems to have caused a stir not just in America but worldwide with thousands of people doing independent research in an attempt to get the facts out. The problem with independent research is that it is hard to verify where the alleged facts came from and when they are traced back its not unusual to find that it stemmed from opinion.
With several birth certificates doing the rounds, many proven as hoaxes, the ‘official’ birth certificate in the Obama nationality scandal seems to prove that the president was in fact a British Subject at birth. On the website dedicated to protecting Obama from smears, Fight The Smears, there is an electronic copy of the birth certificate showing that Obama was born a British Subject. This in itself has been the cause for much speculation on how, why and when nationality was transferred.
Obama’s nationality scandal doesn’t seem to be going anywhere at the moment and even the secret service seem to be taking an interest in anyone questioning Obama’s nationality with visits being made for security reasons. Reported last week at Mother Jones, more and more people who have raised the issue are being visited by the secret service and being left feeling very intimidated.
No matter what side of the fence you sit on this scandal seems set to stay around for a long time to come.
One Internet commenter says: I believe that as soon as Obama becomes a liability to the socialist/marxist cause he will be removed via a sudden release of his birth certificate.
http://www.news-independent.com/barack-obama-nationality-scandal/
OBA-HUSSEIN YOU ARE SCARING SANE, INTELLIGENT PEOPLE!
You Scare Me, Obama
by Lou Pritchet
Rahm Emanuel says he is "fed up" with Israel's behavior. A little humility would be welcome, because a good many Americans are "fed up" and worried about where this president is taking their country. Written a while ago and just as timely now.
AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA
Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.
You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.
You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don't understand it at its core.
You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others.
You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' crowd and deliver this message abroad.
You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.
You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.
You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.
You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics against certain banks and corporations.
You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.
You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.
You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.
You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O'Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.
You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.
Lou Pritchett
by Lou Pritchet
Rahm Emanuel says he is "fed up" with Israel's behavior. A little humility would be welcome, because a good many Americans are "fed up" and worried about where this president is taking their country. Written a while ago and just as timely now.
AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA
Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.
You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.
You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don't understand it at its core.
You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others.
You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' crowd and deliver this message abroad.
You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.
You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.
You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.
You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics against certain banks and corporations.
You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.
You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.
You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.
You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O'Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.
You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.
Lou Pritchett
Friday, January 08, 2010
MUCH TRUTH SAID IN JEST
AND A MOCKERY MADE BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OF SERIOUS MATTERS
AND......... OBA-HUSSEIN IS IMPORTING TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PALESTINIANS - AT TAXPAYER COST - INTO AMERICA, WHO FROM CHILDHOOD ARE TAUGHT TO KILL
Okay .. lets get some info out there to tell people why these idiots have such “determination”.
In 1985, I listened to a speaker who travels to Israel and the Middle East all the time. On this trip, she went with friends to meet with some Palentinian mothers who were upset by what their children were being taught.
The mothers told this story: Their children at the age of 7 (both boys and girls) were taken to Hezbollah camps during the summer, and when the children returned home, they would be overwhelmed with a particular chant they had been taught.
The boys were told to take the puppy dog from the box in front of them, and when they all had their puppy dogs, they were instructed to kill the puppy by ringing it’s neck, and then to say this rhyme; “This is the dog the Jew, and this is what I can do to the dog the Jew”.
Subsequently, over in the girls’ compound, they were told to take the small snake out of the box in front of them, and while they were cutting the snake’s head off with an axe, they were told to repeat the following; “This is the snake the Jew, and this is what I can do to the snake the Jew.”
These people are taught from childhood to be cruel and to kill anyone who is not like them (Islam). And .. why should it be such a SURPRISE that these people are determined to kill us.
The Obama group is (intentionally?) too ignorant to understand why the terrorist is so willing to die to kill us .. like bin Laden said, “We love death, you love life”. And .. these people still didn’t know how the terrorist views the West.
These idiots in the current admin are going to get us all killed - by their ignorance of who the enemy is. (Or supporting them in dhimmitude!)
ANOTHER CHANGE OF PACE - GOOD ADVICE
AFTER YEARS OF TELLING PEOPLE CHEMOTHERAPY IS THE ONLY WAY TO TRY ('TRY', BEING THE KEY WORD) TO ELIMINATE CANCER, JOHNS HOPKINS IS FINALLY STARTING TO TELL YOU THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY.
Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins :
1. Every person has cancer cells in the body . These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cell is in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.
2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person's lifetime.
3 When the person's immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.
4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies . These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors .
5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.
6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.
7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.
8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.
9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications.
10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.
11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply .. < BR>
*CANCER CELLS FEED ON:
a. Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells. Sugar substitutes like Nutra Sweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful . A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses, but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color. Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt .
b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus . By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer cells are being starved.
c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.
d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains, seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment . About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fr Fresh vege table juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells.
To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).
e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate , which have high caffeine. Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer fighting properties. Water - best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.
12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines becomes putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.
13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack t he protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.
14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the bodies own killer cells to destroy cancer cells.. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.
15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit . A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.
16. Cancer cells cannot t hrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily , and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.
1. No plastic containers in micro .
2. No water bottles in freezer .
3. No plastic wrap in microwave .
Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxi n chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Cast le Hospital, was on a TV program to explain this health hazard.
He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body.
Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper.
It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper. The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.
Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran , is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.
Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins :
1. Every person has cancer cells in the body . These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cell is in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.
2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person's lifetime.
3 When the person's immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.
4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies . These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors .
5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.
6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.
7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.
8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.
9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications.
10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.
11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply .. < BR>
*CANCER CELLS FEED ON:
a. Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells. Sugar substitutes like Nutra Sweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful . A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses, but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color. Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt .
b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus . By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer cells are being starved.
c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.
d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains, seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment . About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fr Fresh vege table juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells.
To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).
e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate , which have high caffeine. Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer fighting properties. Water - best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.
12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines becomes putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.
13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack t he protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.
14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the bodies own killer cells to destroy cancer cells.. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.
15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit . A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.
16. Cancer cells cannot t hrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily , and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.
1. No plastic containers in micro .
2. No water bottles in freezer .
3. No plastic wrap in microwave .
Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxi n chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Cast le Hospital, was on a TV program to explain this health hazard.
He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body.
Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper.
It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper. The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.
Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran , is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.
Thursday, January 07, 2010
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
