Sunday, March 18, 2007

WINSTON CHURCHILL HAD IT RIGHT?

I posted the religious question on a huge blog and there are some very erudite comments. The most telling one was that Abraham, who appears to be the key player, was approached by Jehovah (as written some 600+ years before Islam or Mohammad even existed), makes any claim that "Allah" spoke to Abraham first seem a bit of a stretch. Below is a "solid" comment by: Garduneh Mehr says the following: Alan, Neither of the two posts you quote are worth a thought. As you well know Muslims are incurably afflicted with verbal diarrhea. I'll only make the following observations: The first verbose comment by "AhmadiNezhad" clearly shows that Muslims lack the moral and mental capacity to realize that an individual or group or an idealogy is judged by its conduct and not by its philosphy. Muslim savages never learnt the wisdom of the words: "By their fruits shall ye know them. An evil tree does not bring forth good fruit nor does a good tree bring forth evil fruit." The fruits of Islam namely contention and aggression death and destruction, violations of women and children are displayed by Muslims before the whole world. From Mohammad's "marriage", in his fifties, to a six year old child to today's chlorine gas attack in Baghdad any fairminded person can see what islam is all about. As for hrsa's comment(s), he and his ilk are just angry because they cann't see a future for themselves or for their political and military ambitions. So, pay him no attention and let him stew in his own bile. That's all that the likes of him deserve. One last thought though, I'd like to share with you, Sir Winston Churchill's observations regarding Islam, which if I may suggest, could make a worthwhile post in your blog: "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, (rabies) there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.… A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law (sharia) every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.... The influence of the religion [Islam] paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." [The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pp. 248-50.] Alan Note: The West, specially Europe is now in the midst of a reverse Crusade by Islam, which is spreading like a cancer and enslaving credulous, free thinking Westerners, in the name of Allah. As Winston Churchill said, it is a religion of enslavement and the West is being enslaved. Luckily as in the article posted below, " European Declaration of Independence", some are waking up to the threat. Even Ireland, strongly Catholic or Protestant, has begun to feel this incursion and poisoning of their customs and culture.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Ba Dorood'd Irani bar Alan'e gerami,

Fara residan'e Norooz'e Jamishidi ra beh shoma doost'e Iran'Zamin paak'delaneh shaad baash migoyam.

Har rooz'etan Norooz.
Norooz'etan Pirooz.