Thursday, February 28, 2008

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT IN PICTURES - GOOD GRIEF!!

TRUTH !!!


Is she as nuts as she appears?


Does HER normal dress sense surpass Obama's Somali clothing she mocks?



The real HIllary?

Mmmm. Like your ......


Hillary gets angry at Obama



Hillary borrows a page from Islamic Jihadists


Crocodile Tears!



I can't believe you are doing this to me!



Neither can I, Mom!





And how about girl Friday Huma?



Huma on the right, also astonished at being so close to power and so influential on American politics.






If you watched the last Democratic Presidential candidate debate, at the end, the lady shown above with Hillary Clinton was on stage, directing Hillary, making phone calls to who knows whom, selecting favorites to receive autographs, interacting with Chelsea and so on. Who is she? Clinton's long time Girl Friday and some say girl friend.

Nothing wrong with that, you might say. UNTIL you look at this lady's background and her high maintenance life style on a tiny official income and family ties to Al Qaeda.

How in heaven does she get clearance to be in such close proximity to national secrets and has been for at least a decade! Including in the Clinton White House!

CHECK OUT HUMA ABEDIN WITH HILLARY CLINTON IN MAY 2000 DURING THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION! click here

We want the Clintons to protect us against terrorism? Fat chance. Here is the proof.

Huma's Al Qaeda Family links click here

PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT - REPEATED FOR REMINDER

Denmark has already taken action to restrain Islamic incursion, we should also wake up and take action. PROSPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDEMENT click here

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

KHOMEINI'S FATHER WAS BRITISH (Judge for Yourself)

READ THE "WHO IS KHOMEINI" ARTICLE USING EITHER THE LINK BELOW OR BY CLICKING ON THE TITLE/SUBJECT TO GO TO IT ON THIS SITE.



There is no doubt Sean Connery (now Sir Sean Connery) is British, though he may prefer to be called a Scotsman.


Now view BOTH with a black turban (indicator of being "Seyed", a direct descendant of the Prophet Mohammad, which Khomeini had absolutely no more right to wear than Sir Connery but the white turban to which he could be entitled would put him in a lower Islamic rung than hundreds, even thousands, of other clerics, so he just expanded his lie of his origins).

Note: there is a closely kept, official, repository of the family trees of ALL the multitude of descendants of the Prophet in Egypt to this day and nobody has been able to find any mention of a Khomeini line or even a Khomeini related descent.

It takes a second look to see that the second set of photos are NOT of the same person.

WHO IS KHOMEINI Click Here

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Europe's Muslim Radicals: The Next Generation

Europe's Muslim Radicals: The Next Generation
"American kill," said the five-year-old boy. "Bush I kill." And as his proud father watched, beaming, he demonstrated how to cut the evil American's bare throat.

So it was in a Birmingham, England, home – as recorded secretly by British security services a few months ago while investigating the child's British-Pakistani father, Parvis Khan, then a suspect in a plot to kill a Muslim British soldier. This week, after his plan had been thwarted by MI5, Khan was sentenced to life in prison.

And what will become of the boy?

If he is lucky, he will learn from the example made of Dear Old Dad, and steer away from Islamic extremism completely. More likely, angered by the British infidels who took his father away from him, he will follow in Parvis' footsteps and endeavor to continue the work his father started.
And he will be, indeed, a formidable soldier for jihad: if he can slit a person's throat at five years old, just imagine what he can do at 20. (After all, Mozart, whose father Leopold was neither Muslim nor Pakistani but did serve as his teacher, began composing at the age of five. I leave it to readers to do with that parallel what they will.)
He may, for starters, do the way they do in Denmark, where last week, Muslim youths committed over 80 arson attacks in major cities, setting not just cars, but even schools in flames.
This unrest followed a decision by Denmark's Jyllands-Posten to republish the 2006 cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed; it is blasphemy, in Islam, to depict Mohammad's image, and those cartoons were met, when they were first published, with anti-Denmark demonstrations and riots throughout the Muslim world.
This time, the cartoons were re-issued as a gesture of solidarity in response to new threats made on the cartoonist's life. Unsurprisingly, Muslim leaders – in Denmark and elsewhere – have had little to say about the actual plan to murder a newspaper cartoonist over a drawing; to the contrary, Iran's Press TV remarked:
"This repeated insult towards a religion shared by 2.5 percent of the Danish population and more than 20 percent of the world's people may also have opened old wounds and fueled the violence in the country."
That European Muslim youth are radicalizing at a rapid rate is, of course, nothing new. What is notable is their age, which grows increasingly younger. And we are woefully unprepared, even as we should have seen this coming, to deal with it.
And we should have seen it coming.
As radical youth, usually second- and third-generation immigrants, reach their early and mid-twenties, they are having children of their own, and raising those children according to the principles of fundamentalist Islam. Add to this the increasing number of women also flocking towards salafism, and you have an instant two-parent jihadi family, creating a home environment that can't but engender similar world views in the children.
Before his arrest, Parviz Khan was already preparing his three-year-old daughter to marry a terrorist. I doubt he was the only such father on the block.
These are not small families, either, and older brothers (or sisters) are quick to recruit their younger siblings, whose commitment to Islam promises, in their elders' eyes, their redemption. Just how old will our five-year-old throat-slasher be, for instance, when he teaches his little sister a couple of his favorite tricks? And his best friend down the street?
("Look," he'll say, in his well-practiced, David Beckham accent, "Isn't this cool?") And when the best friend teaches his own little sister, whom will she teach, in turn?
If this were not enough, schools, too, have taken up the cause. The headmaster of an Islamic high school in the Khan family's hometown of Birmingham, according to The Guardian, has said he "disagrees with using the word democracy." 'They should call it ... kuffrocracy, that's their plan," The Guardian quotes him as saying. "It's the hidden cancerous aim of these people." "Kuffar" is a derogatory term for "unbelievers."
Even further support comes from the mosques, where in Britain (and elsewhere in Europe), parents are being told to beat their children if they do not pray, and to hit their daughters if they refuse to wear a hijab, or scarf.
Officials throughout Europe have watched extremist imams, listened to their incendiary sermons, for years now, but failed, in most cases, to notice the efforts being made not just to create converts to radical Islam in the West, but to raise them.
Yet child development experts and others have long known that violent homes breed violent children: In one US Department of Justice report, researchers found that "Sixty-nine percent of the youths who had been maltreated as children reported involvement in violence as compared to 56 percent of those who had not been maltreated. In other words, a history of maltreatment increases the chances of youth violence by 24 percent."
In most cases, you can teach the parents this, and they will choose to refrain from such behaviors, or try to.
But what do we do when violent and angry children are exactly what the parents want? Even removing such children from their homes won't help; in most cases, it will only make them angrier, and more troubled.
I'm not suggesting I have any answers to this. I don't. But it's time we – and especially social services experts – start looking for them. Because these days, it's the jihadi generation, and it's coming at you, going strong.
— Abigail R. Esman is an award-winning author-journalist can be reached at esman@worlddefensereview.com.

Monday, February 25, 2008

MAJOR EXPLOSION ROCKS TABRIZ - NORTH WEST IRAN

Did something go wrong with nuclear research or longer range missile development in this Azari city? The explosion rocked the city and feelers have been put out to discover what happened since Iran's press has not published anything beyond confirming an explosion they could not hide, nor deny. FOR BACKGROUND: Early February report in German Press: Mahmud Ahmadinedschad, president of Iran and the most dangerous man in the world, who wants to annihilate Israel, will soon have Berlin within reach of his rockets! According to the analysis of the BND [a German intelligence agency], Iran has bought 18 unassembled mobile rockets of type BM-25 (range 2500km and then had the rockets remodelled, based on the Russian submarine rocket SS-N-6, to obtain a 3500 km range. This is exactly the distance Teheran-Berlin. Until recently it was only known that Iran posessed Shehab-3 rockets, with a range of 1300 km. The BND has issued a wide-ranging warning based on this new threat: “Germany and other parts of Europe could in the medium to long term be directly affected by the Iranian rocket program.” According to a recent and secret BND report, in the possession of BILD [the publisher of this article]: “With the future longer ranges and the nuclear capability probably under development, Iran could reach all of Israel as well as parts of central Europe.” The Iranian regime searches to obtain a “first-strike capability”. This would “change” the threat picture for NATO andGermany. The BND has information that Iranian experts currently work hard at placing nuclear devices in rocket warheads. [Near Täbriz, 600 kilometers northwest of Teheran, the German intelligence [or clearing, enlightenment] located a stationary starting system (there is probably a fix term for that) for the test of silo-supported rockets (distance from Berlin approximately 2900 kilometers). In plain language: From there, the “Madman of Teheran” could reach targets all over Germany!] Also the US is entering the sights [of Iran]. According to the BND, a delivery of aluminum rings from China has been discovered. These building parts “have as their main use the construction of a multi-stage rocket body with a range of potentially up to 10000 km.” Bush warned yesterday: “Iran is a real threat”. He confirmed: Together with North Korea and pre-war Iraq, the Teheran regime is part of the “axis of evil.”

TOUCHES YOUR HEART


These two guys reared this lion from a baby in England, but the authorities would not allow them to keep it once it reached maturity, so they were forced to give it up.


They took it back to Africa and placed it in a wildlife sanctuary.


A year later they went to see it and were told it would not remember them. The video tells the story.

video

Saturday, February 23, 2008

DANISH APOLOGY TO ISLAMIC CARTOON PROTEST

READ Islam Blasphemy plans here and Danish story another two articles farther down Official Danish Apology Universal Islamic “Blasphemy” Law ? by Andrew Bostom The 57 Muslim Nations of the Organization of the Islamic Conference are Trying to Impose Islamic Blasphemy Law—Which Includes the Death Penalty For Those Who “Blaspheme” the Muslim prophet Muhammad—as the Universal Standard ############# Early Tuesday morning (2/12/08) “three men with a Muslim background” were arrested by Danish police on anti-terrorism charges, suspected of having plotted to murder Kurt Westergaard, a cartoonist for Jyllands-Posten. Westergaard is one of the 12 cartoonists who on September 30, 2005 published cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad to protest the tacit enforcement in Danish society of Islam’s taboo on depictions of Muhammad, no matter how banal, or inoffensive, through intimidation—a clear violation of Western freedom of expression. Upon learning of the arrests, Westergaard (noted for this cartoon) commented aptly, “I think…that the impact of the insane response to my cartoon will last for the rest of my life. It is sad indeed, but it has become a fact of my life.” And within 3-days, by February 15, 2008, confirming the pervasive fear of violent Muslim reprisal that apparently grips Danish society, Westergaard was ejected from his police-protected hotel room having been deemed, “too much of a security risk.” Now the 73-year-old cartoonist and his wife are homeless. Not surprisingly, when newspapers in Denmark, and across Europe re-published the 12 original cartoons in solidarity with the threatened cartoonist, violent protests ensued by Danish Muslims (including burnings, and perhaps a bombing). Other violent demonstrations took place in Muslim communities across the Middle East and Asia. Yet scant attention has been paid to a remarkable—and remarkably chilling—statement that was issued on Friday February 15, 2008 by Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the Turkish Secretary General of the Jeddah-based Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the world’s unique pan-Islamic political body, comprised of 57 members, including “secular” Turkey. Conveniently ignoring that the re-publication in Denmark of 12 banal cartoons depicting the Muslim prophet Muhammad was an urgent, sane protest of the disrupted plot by Muslims to murder one of the original Danish cartoonists, Kurt Westergaard, and oblivious to the immoral equivalence he was making, Ihsanoglu stated, By reprinting these cartoons we are heading toward a bigger conflict and that shows that both sides will be hostages of their radicals. Continuing, Ihsanoglu further demonstrated both the complete absence of self-criticism, and triumphalism of the Islamic worldview that seeks to impose its Shari’a-based conceptions—antithetical to true freedom of conscience and expression—on all of humanity. And he concluded with a thinly veiled threat of violence: It is not a way of improving your rights and exercising your freedoms when you use these rights for insulting the most sacred values and symbols of others and inciting hatred…This is a very wrong, provocative path - unacceptable. Two years earlier, on 1/18/06, in response to the initial printing of the Danish cartoons, Ihsanoglu had denounced, “…the publication of blasphemous and insulting caricatures of Prophet Muhammad.” He concluded that this “Islamophobic” act of “sacrilege” somehow contravened, “…international principles, values, and ethics enshrined in the various resolutions and declarations of the United Nations.” These sentiments of Ihsanoglu (and the OIC he represents) were reiterated more brazenly by Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi during a sermon which aired February 3, 2006. Qaradawi demanded action from the United Nations in accord with purely Islamic, Shari’a-based conceptions of “blasphemy”: …the governments [of the world] must be pressured to demand that the U.N. adopt a clear resolution or law that categorically prohibits affronts to prophets—to the prophets of the Lord and his Messengers, to His holy books, and to the religious holy places. But the unctuous Ishanoglu, in stark contrast to his sharp attacks on the Danish cartoonists, has never issued a statement condemning the sermons of authoritative, hugely popular Muslim clerics such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi, for example, who elsewhere, has openly proclaimed Muhammad as the prototype jihadist. Sheikh al-Qaradawi, one of the most influential contemporary Muslim thinkers, “spiritual” leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, and head of the European Fatwa Council, reaches an enormous audience during his regular appearances on Al- Jazeera, and other Arabic television outlets. Qaradawi’s inflammatory February 3, 2006 sermon, which addressed the original publication of the Danish cartoons depicting the Muslim prophet Muhammad, opens with seething, self-righteous anger, segues into Qaradawi’s now standard, pro-forma Jew hatred, and closes, most disturbingly, with thinly veiled threats of terrorism to “…Westerners, the Americans, and Europeans.” The sheer, blatant hypocrisy of these statements decrying the cartoon portrayals of Muhammad can only be appreciated when viewed in the larger overall context of his pious jihadism, most notably Qaradawi’s prior characterization of “Muhammad as a jihad model”: The prophets that Allah sent prior to Muhammad were sent for a limited time …and to a specific people. … Allah established in the life of the Prophet Muhammad general, eternal, and all inclusive characteristics, and he gave every human being the possibility to imitate him and take his life as a model…The Christian is incapable of imitating Jesus regarding war and conciliation since Jesus never fought or made peace. Allah has also made the prophet Muhammad into an epitome for religious warriors [Mujahideen] since he ordered Muhammed to fight for religion. Previously, Qaradawi elaborated both the targets and allowable “tactics” for those contemporary Muslims whom he encourages to wage jihad. Jews, and their allies, figure prominently in these statements. For example, at the July 2003 meeting (in Stockholm) of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, Qaradawi emphasized the orthodox Islamic basis for human homicide bomb “martyrdom operations” to be directed against all Israeli citizens, whom he further described as classic “harbis”, licit targets in the Dar al Harb. Although neither Qaradawi’s admonitions for all out jihad against Israeli Jews, nor his constant Jew baiting, are surprising, he has also called for jihad martyrdom operations against American forces in Iraq, and more ominously, Qaradawi has made unabashed appeals for Muslims to wage a “jihad re-conquest” of Europe. His public fatwa on December 2, 2002 stated, “Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and a victor after being expelled from it twice – once from the south, from Andalusia, and a second time, from the east, when it knocked several times on the doors of Athens.” Qaradawi’s fatwa ruled, in addition, that Muslims should re-conquer, “…former Islamic colonies to Andalus[ia] (Spain), southern Italy, Sicily, the Balkans and the Mediterranean islands.” And even in that purely mythical paragon of Islamic ecumenism—“Andalusia,” Muslim Spain during the Middle Ages (which not only Qaradawi, but legions of “moderate” Muslims openly profess they would like to restore)—Islamic supremacism, as codified in Islamic Law, engendered the same deep-seated, sacralized intolerance that has always predominated under Muslim rule. Already by the end of the eighth century, the rulers of Andalusia (and North Africa) had established rigorous Malikism as the dominant Islamic school of jurisprudence, rendering the Muslim Andalusian state, as noted in historian Evariste Levi-Provencal’s seminal Histoire de l’Espagne musulmane, “…the defender and champion of a jealous orthodoxy, more and more ossified in a blind respect for a rigid doctrine, suspecting and condemning in advance the least effort of rational speculation.” Consistent with this historical reality, Charles Emmanuel Dufourcq, a pre-eminent scholar of Muslim Spain, observed that the myriad religious and legal discriminations suffered by non-Muslim dhimmis (i.e., the non-Muslim Iberian populations vanquished by jihad, and governed by Islamic law, Shari’a), included lethal punishments for “blaspheming” the Muslim prophet, or the Koran: [For] having insulted the Prophet or blasphemed against the Word of God (i.e., The Koran)—dhimmis were executed. A millennium later, Islam’s draconian punishment for infidels accused of blaspheming the Muslim prophet Muhammad persisted, with uncompromising ferocity. French painter Alfred Dehodencq’s striking “Execution of a Moroccan Jewess” is based upon the actual blasphemy execution of a Jewess from Tangier, Morocco, Sol Hachuel, believed to have occurred in 1834. A detailed, near contemporary account of Sol Hachuel’s heroic martyrdom—using eyewitness interviews—was published in 1837 by Eugenio Maria Romero. Accused, falsely, of having become a Muslim, and then “blaspheming” Muhammad, upon adamantly and steadfastly maintaining her Jewish faith (“A Jewess I was born, a Jewess I wish to die”), the 17 year-old Sol was beheaded publicly for both this contrived “apostasy” from Islam, and “blasphemy.” Among the narrative details Romero provides of the young victim’s execution day in Fez is this depiction of how the Muslim masses reacted to the charge of “blasphemy” against her: …the streets were crowded with Moors [Muslims] of all ages and sexes, who made the air resound with their discordant cries. “here comes,” said they, “she who blasphemed the Prophet—death! death! to the impious wretch!” Abundant contemporary evidence demonstrates that Islamic law and mores regarding blasphemy, today, remain distressingly incompatible with modern conceptions of religious freedom, and human rights. Thus writing in the early 1990s, the esteemed Pakistani scholar Muhammad Asrar, whose opinion was accepted by Pakistan’s Shari’a Court, defined “blasphemy”, focusing on the Muslim prophet, as: Reviling or insulting the Prophet (pbuh) in writing or speech; speaking profanely or contemptuously about him or his family; attacking the Prophet’s dignity and honor in an abusive manner; vilifying him or making an ugly face when his named is mentioned; showing enmity or hatred towards him, his family, his companions, and the Muslims; accusing, or slandering the Prophet and his family, including spreading evil reports about him or his family; defaming the Prophet; refusing the Prophet’s jurisdiction or judgment in any manner; rejecting the Sunnah; showing disrespect, contempt for or rejection of the rights of Allah and His Prophet or rebelling against Allah and His Prophet. And in accord with classical Islamic jurisprudence (for example, The Risala of al-Qayrawani [d. 996]), Madani argues that anyone who defames Muhammad—Muslim or non-Muslim—must be put to death. Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo has documented how this orthodox Islamic doctrine—incorporated into the Pakistani legal code (Section 295-C, “defiling the name of Muhammad”)—has wreaked havoc, particularly among Pakistan’s small Christian minority community: …the blasphemy law is felt to be a sword of Damocles and has developed a huge symbolic significance which contributes substantially to the atmosphere of intimidation of Christians. The detrimental effect of the law…is most dramatically illustrated by the incident at Shanti Nagar in February 1997 in which tens of thousands of rioting Muslims destroyed hundreds of Christian homes, and other Christian property, following an accusation of blasphemy. Furthermore the blasphemy has engendered a wave of private violence. Equating blasphemy with apostasy and influenced by the tradition of direct violent action and self-help which goes back to the earliest times of Islam, some Muslims feel they are entitled to enforce the death penalty themselves. After at least four such murders, and the “blasphemy” case of Ayub Masih (who had been incarcerated in solitary confinement since October 14, 1996 and sentenced to death on April 27, 1998 by Sessions Court Judge Rana Abdul Ghaffar), Bishop John Joseph of Faisalbad committed suicide on May 6 1998, to protest the continued application of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. And incidents which have occurred within just the past 2-months illustrate that what prevails in Pakistan is hardly unique, but rather emblematic. Pervez Kambakhsh, a 23 year-old Afghan journalist was recently convicted (January 2008) of “blasphemy”—consistent with classical Islamic Law—for downloading and distributing an article “insulting” Islam, including the “blasphemous” allegation that “…Muhammad had ignored the rights of women..” Subsequently the Afghan Senate issued a statement on the case—signed by its leader, Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, a reputed ally of President Hamid Karzai—approving the death sentence conferred on Mr Kambakhsh, also in full accord with the Shari’a, by a city court in Mazar-e-Sharif. Within days, the Afghan Senate bowed to international pressure, and apparently reversed itself, withdrawing the confirmation of Kambakhsh’s death sentence for blasphemy. However, although not universal, commonplace public sentiments in support of this Shari’a ruling were expressed by Afghans across the age spectrum. Abdul Wasi Tokhi, an 18-year-old student at the American University in Kabul, argued for a swift execution, stating: “The guy should be hanged. He was making fun of Islam’s rules and regulations. He was making fun of the Prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him. You cannot criticize any principles which have been approved by sharia. It is the words of the Prophet.” And Qari Imam Bakhsh, a Muslim cleric, concurred, maintaining: “I think he is not a Muslim. A Muslim would not make this kind of mistake. He should be punished so that others can learn from him.” This January, 2008, as well, in Iraqi Kurdistan—upheld as a successful model of regional Islamic moderation, even secularization—more evidence of oppressive, re-emergent Shari’a was on display. A court in Halabja (where Saddam Hussein’s minions gassed thousands of Kurdish civilians in 1988, 15 years prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom), sentenced a Kurdish author in absentia to six months in prison for blasphemy. The author, Mariwan Halabjaee, was accused of writing in a book that Mohammed had 19 wives, married a 9-year-old when he was 54, and took part in murder and rape—all of which can confirmed from the “sira,” the authoritative, earliest pious Muslim biographies of his life (like this one by Ibn Ishaq/Ibn Hisham). From his asylum in Norway, Mr. Halabjee maintained that a fatwa calling for his death unless he pleads for forgiveness, has also been issued. Intrepid historian David Littman has been chronicling, nearly alone, for almost two decades, the concerted efforts of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to Islamize international human rights instruments, and apply the Shari’a “standard” for blasphemy—pace the current Kambakhsh and Halabjee travesties—to all nations. Littman warned, for example, about the development of the Shari’a-based 1990 Cairo Declaration (i.e., the so-called Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Islam), to which all member states of the OIC are signatories, publicizing the immediate objections of a brave Senegalese jurist, Adama Dieng. Dieng, a Muslim, who subsequently became a United Nations special rapporteur, then serving as secretary-general to the International Commission of Jurists, declared forthrightly in February 1992 that the Cairo Declaration, under the rubric of the Shari’a, …gravely threatens the inter-cultural consensus on which the international human rights instruments are based; introduces, in the name of the defense of human rights, an intolerable discrimination against both non-Muslims and women; reveals a deliberately restrictive character in regard to certain fundamental rights and freedoms..; [and] confirms the legitimacy of practices, such as corporal punishment, that attack the integrity and dignity of the human being. K.S. Lal, the late Indian Professor of Islam, noted this difficult, if not intractable conundrum: Muhammad could not change the revelation; he could only explain and interpret it. There are liberal Muslims and conservative Muslims; there are Muslims learned in theology and Muslims devoid of learning. They discuss, they interpret, they rationalize—but all by going round and round within the closed circle of Islam. There is no possibility of getting out of the fundamentals of Islam; there is no provision of introducing any innovation. Confirmation of Lal’s observations at the “macro” level of international relations is manifested by the ceaseless, and increasingly successful campaign of the OIC to enforce universal application of a Shari’a standard, in complete opposition to bedrock principles of modern human rights, such a freedom of expression, and conscience. More than a decade ago, Samuel Huntington observed appositely, and with a candor that is now exceedingly rare, The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture… During his recent debate with the cultural jihadist Tariq Ramadan, Ibn Warraq elucidated what is at stake should such Islamic supremacism prevail: The great ideas of the West—rationalism, self-criticism, the disinterested search for truth, the separation of church and state, the rule of law and equality under the law, freedom of thought and expression, human rights, and liberal democracy—are superior to any others devised by humankind. It was the West that took steps to abolish slavery; the calls for abolition did not resonate even in Africa, where rival tribes sold black prisoners into slavery. The West has secured freedoms for women and racial and other minorities to an extent unimaginable 60 years ago. The West recognizes and defends the rights of the individual: we are free to think what we want, to read what we want, to practice our religion, to live lives of our choosing. …Nor does the West need lectures on the superior virtue of societies in which women are kept in subjection under sharia, endure genital mutilation, are stoned to death for alleged adultery, and are married off against their will at the age of nine; societies that deny the rights of supposedly lower castes; societies that execute homosexuals and apostates. The West has no use for sanctimonious homilies from societies that cannot provide clean drinking water or sewage systems, that make no provisions for the handicapped, and that leave 40 to 50 percent of their citizens illiterate.

DID IT MY WAY (Video of Civilized Iran)

UNLESS YOU ARE IN TOTAL DENIAL, AFTER SOME 30-YEARS OF THE MULLAHS TO COMPARE WITH THE 30+ YEARS OF THE LATE SHAH, WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE IN IRAN TODAY? INSTEAD OF CARTER AND HIS EVIL CREATION, KHOMEINI AND THE MULLAHS, STILL BEING AROUND WOULD YOU NOT TRULY PREFER TO HAVE THE "BAD, BAD" SHAH AND HIS PECADILLOS IN IRAN INSTEAD OF THE BRUTAL, DARK AGES CLERICS AND THEIR TERRORIST ISLAMIC JIHADISTS?

MORE AND MORE EUROPEAN AND OTHER WESTERN GOVERNMENTS HAVE COME TO REALIZE WHAT A GLOBAL DISASTER, FAR WORSE THAN THE PLAGUE AND FLESH EATING BACTERIA, JIMMUH, "THE IDIOT" CARTER UNLEASHED ON THE WORLD BECAUSE THE SHAH REFUSED TO PAY HIM BLACKMAIL AND BOW TO HIS EXTORTION,

Read about it on:

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/jimmy-carters-illegal-demands-on-shah.html

And view the article below this one on Denmark

For the pro-Mossadegh and former pro-Soviet apologists and biased critics of the monarchy, tell me how the Shah at his VERY worst was even on the same planet as the murderous Ayatollahs Carter inflicted on us. And which threaten to destroy Western civilization far more certainly than Gengis Khan and his Mongols did in their day.

DENMARK - MICROCOSM OF ISLAMIC INVASION AND SOLUTION TEMPLATE

By McAllen In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets -all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite? By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history. The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: "Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending." "Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes." "Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane." "Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem." "Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough – a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim." It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and the US: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today. In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of "racism" by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't. In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. "We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration. The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now," he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, "The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference," Hvilshøj says, "There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come." And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, "In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech." Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay (ISLAMIC) blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. (Hip, hip hurray!) The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole (welfare). As we in America look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history . . we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own. Alan note: AND NOT FOLLOW ENGLAND'S CAPITULATING POLICY OF "if you can't fight them, join them!" which is increasingly the policy in fast sinking England into an Islamic, Sharia controlled, society. AND WE ARE MOVING IN THAT DIRECTION IN CANADA AND THE USA!! WAKE UP AMERICA! LEARN FROM DENMARK'S PLIGHT AND THEIR SOLUTIONS. Or die suicidally from lack of resolve - or sheer stupidity.

HEADS UP! VIRUS ALERT

BETTER HEAR THIS TWICE THAN NEVER AND LOSE YOUR HARD DRIVE DATA http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/postcard.asp Hi All, I checked with Norton Anti-Virus, and they are gearing up for this virus! I checked snopes.com, and it is for real!! Get this E-mail message sent around to your contacts ASAP. PLEASE FORWARD THIS WARNING AMONG FRIENDS, FAMILY AND CONTACTS! You should be alert during the next few days. Do not open any message with an attachment entitled 'POSTCARD,' regardless of who sent it to you. It is a virus which opens A POSTCARD IMAGE, which 'burns' the whole hard disc C of your computer. This virus will be received from someone who has your e-mail address in his/her contact list. This is the reason why you need to send this e-mail to all your contacts. It is better to receive this message 25 times than to receive the virus and open it. If you receive a mail called' POSTCARD,' even though sent to you by a friend, do not open it! Shut down your computer immediately. This is the worst virus announced by CNN. It has been classified by Microsoft as the most destructive virus ever. This virus was discovered by McAfee yesterday, and there is no repair yet for this kind of virus. This virus simply destroys the Zero Sector of the Hard Disc, where the vital information is kept. This virus will be received from someone who has your e-mail address in his/her contact list. This is the reason why you need to send this e-mail to all your contacts. It is better to receive this message 25 times than to receive the virus and open it. Variations: Other subject lines used with this message include the following: You've recieved a Hallmark E-Card! You've received a greeting card from a school-mate! You've received a greeting ecard from a class mate! You've received a greeting ecard from a neighbour! You've received a greeting postcard from a partner! You've received a greeting postcard from a worshipper! You've received a postcard from a family member! You've received a postcard from a neighbour! You've received a postcard from a worshipper! You've received an ecard from a colleague! Class-mate sent you an ecard from vintagepostcards.com! Colleague sent you a greeting ecard from postcardsfrom.com! School mate sent you a greeting ecard from greetingcard.org! Family member sent you a postcard from dgreetings.com! Neighbour sent you a greeting ecard from NetFunCards.com! School-mate sent you an ecard from mypostcards.com! Worshipper sent you an ecard from greetingcard.org! Colleague sent you a postcard from egreetings.com! Neighbour sent you a greeting ecard from all-yours.net! School friend sent you an ecard from postcards.org! Holiday e-card Movie-quality e-card Love postcard Birthday e-card Thank you card Musical postcard Funny postcard

Friday, February 22, 2008

SAUDI SHARIA FINANCES TERROR

Rachel Ehrenfeld, Director of the American Center for Democracy, said at the Jerusalem Conference Tuesday that Saudi Arabian bankers are the main financiers of global terrorism. Corrupt “Sharia financing” banking practices - legal under Islamic law - are a fairly new phenomenon, Ehrenfeld said. They were first developed by the Muslim brotherhood in the 70s, following the financial power gained by Saudis during the oil boom. ”Saudis are using money in order to corrupt the West, to fund terrorism, and eventually to take over the West,” said Ehrenfeld. “For years, Saudi Arabia has been a main supporter of terrorism, both physically and financially, and their illegal activity is now causing many innocent investors to commit serious crimes without even the knowledge that they are doing so.” According to Ehrenfeld, Saudi Arabian bankers have roughly $1 trillion ready to be invested through means of what she terms “financial Jihad.” The financial practices she refers to as “Sharia financing” are run according to Islamic law, governed solely by the Koran and with no distinction between public and private practices. “Legitimate financing goals are literally indistinguishable from immoral and illegal practices, causing unsuspecting companies and individuals to unknowingly fund terrorism.” “Sharia financing means complete and total submission to Islamic bankers,” Ehrenfeld explained. “Investors give over all rights to choose what their money supports. They are virtually forced to divest from any company or concept that is not in agreement with Muslim ideology or belief, including any company that is even inconsequentially involved with Israel. Additionally, Saudi Arabian bankers have the right to list and delist companies as they please, without legitimate cause or legal course of action." “Not surprisingly, these illegal banking practices do not have security, which comes at a very large price to investors, who are at great risk both of losing their money, endangering their shareholders, and being prosecuted by American banking laws, which strictly forbid the financial support of terrorism. Besides the money that is used to support Islamic agenda, 20% of funds are labeled ‘mandated charity’ and go directly to foreign companies in support of terrorism.” Ehrenfeld warns: “They are expanding fast, and are now in more than 80 countries, and more than 300 financial institutions around the world. This is really spreading like wildfire.”

AFGHAN MEXICANS!


Three Afghan nationals are being held in New Delhi, India after they tried boarding a flight to France, via Kuwait, using Mexican passsports identifying themselves as:

Antonio Lopez Juan (42)

Javier Sanchez Alberto (20)

Atonio Lopez Ernesto (16)

According to Indian press reports, the three men departed from Nedumbaserry Airport in India, on February 11, without incident.
When they arrived in Kuwait, emigration officials found them suspicious because they did not speak any Spanish. They were deported back to India.
The three had reportedly arrived in New Delhi on January 23 this year, as per the stamps on their passports.
However, there was some doubt about the authenticity of the arrival stamps on the passports.
Officials in India said the Mexican Embassy in New Delhi is involved.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

"DEMOCRATIC ISLAM" IS AN IDIOTIC, IMPOSSIBLE APPELLATION (Farsi with English sub-titles)

READ THE ISLAMIC "how to" DEBATE DIRECTIVE AND THEN VIEW THE BILINGUAL VIDEO ON THE OXYMORONIC ASPECTS OF AN ISLAM DEMOCRACY. While the speaker has other videos providing revisionist history, specially about Mossadegh, whom he supports, the video below attacks the Mojaheddin for proposing an Islamic Democracy for Iran. Not so much an attack on them as an attack on the stupidity of their stated philosophy. How to Debate and Frustrate Infidels by Ayesha Ahmed Dear brothers and sisters in islam: We live in kuffar country and daily we have to face the infidels who criticize islam and our prophet, and who want to debate us. In an Islamic country, if someone did that , all we have to do is to announce loudly what he said and the rest is taken care of by an angry mob. The critic is lynched in no time. End of the story. However here we don't have that luxury as yet. Inshallah in forseeble future after we grow by conversions of morons and criminals in prisons, legal and illegal immigration and procreation we will, inshallah, become a majority and will not have to face this problem on daily basis. However, for the time being following is an approach all muslim brothers and sisters can use when faced with such a pest. Jazakallah Khair. Inshallah the vermin will steer clear of you in future. 1. A popular question is "why islam calls for death of Islamic critics and apostates". Insist that their info is false. Quote aya "to you your religion and to me my religion". 2. To answer "Islam spread with sword", say that it is a big lie spread by the jews and hindus and that quran clearly says " there is no compulsion in religion". 3. If some one quotes violent ayas from Koran, accuse him of quoting ayas in bits and pieces and cherry picking . 4. If he then quotes full ayas and ayas before and after, then insist that the translation is wrong. 5. If he brings ten different translations than say correct meanings can be understood only by reading Quran in Arabic. 6. If he happens to be well versed in Arabic language than insist that those ayas don't mean what they appear to mean as they have allegorical meanings. 7. If he is adamant, than say you cannot understand those ayas and it's context without reading hadith and sira. 8. If he shows up with the hadiths and siras in hand and quotes the context of the violent ayas by referring to hadiths of prophet's rapes, robberies , assassinations and genocides then insist that "all hadiths and siras are heresay and are false, and only truth is in quran. 9. If he says Quran is a man made document and wants proof of it's divinity then refer to the sciences in Quran and the book written by Dr. Bucaile confirming the sciences in our holy book. You can also quote that Mahatama Gandhi read Quran daily and also spoke highly of it. 10. If he says that Bucaile was on Saudi payroll and that nor he nor Gandhi ever changed their religions and that Bucaile was challenged and proven wrong by many experts then challenge him to ask his experts to debate islamists like Zakir Naik.. 11. If the pests still hangs around then change the topic and find faults in other religions and their books. 12. If he continues on then use personal attacks and insult him by calling him a jewish a- hole , a Chinese pig or a hindu dog . 13. If that does not frustrate him, then ask him how much he is being paid by jews to throw dirt on Al Islam. 14. If he still does not stop then run for his mother and sister and use very filthy language. 15. If he is very stubborn and wants to continue, then curse him like "Burn in hell, you will repent on last day, Allah will get you in your grave" etc 16. When all of the above has failed, threaten him with bodily harm and end the debate by drum beating and announcing that you won the debate hands down because Koran is the word of allah. 17. If possible announce about this debate in an islamist website and that you had won it handily. Such announcements do wonders for the iman (faith/belief) of muslim website readers and for dawah

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

RADICAL ISLAM WANTS TO BE OBEYED

MOTHER OF MELTDOWNS FOR US ECONOMY?

America's economy risks the mother of all meltdowns By Martin Wolf "I would tell audiences that we were facing not a bubble but a froth - lots of small, local bubbles that never grew to a scale that could threaten the health of the overall economy." (Alan Greenspan, The Age of Turbulence). That used to be Mr Greenspan's view of the US housing bubble. He was wrong,alas. So how bad might this downturn get? To answer this question we should ask a true bear. My favourite one is Nouriel Roubini of New York University's Stern School of Business, founder of RGE monitor. Recently, Professor Roubini's scenarios have been dire enough to make the flesh creep. But his thinking deserves to be taken seriously. He first predicted a US recession in July 2006*. At that time, his view was extremely controversial. It is so no longer. Now he states that there is "a rising probability of a 'catastrophic' financial and economic outcome"**. The characteristics of this scenario are, he argues: "A vicious circle where a deep recession makes the financial losses more severe and where, in turn, large and growing financial losses and a financial meltdown make the recession even more severe. "Prof Roubini is even fonder of lists than I am. Here are his 12 - yes, 12 -steps to financial disaster. Step one is the worst housing recession in US history. House prices will, hes ays, fall by 20 to 30 per cent from their peak, which would wipe out between $4,000bn and $6,000bn in household wealth. Ten million households will end up with negative equity and so with a huge incentive to put the house keys in the post and depart for greener fields. Many more home-builders will be bankrupted. Step two would be further losses, beyond the $250bn-$300bn now estimated,for subprime mortgages. About 60 per cent of all mortgage originationbetween 2005 and 2007 had "reckless or toxic features", argues Prof Roubini. Goldman Sachs estimates mortgage losses at $400bn. But if home prices fell by more than 20 per cent, losses would be bigger. That would further impair the banks' ability to offer credit. Step three would be big losses on unsecured consumer debt: credit cards, auto loans, student loans and so forth. The "credit crunch" would thenspread from mortgages to a wide range of consumer credit. Step four would be the downgrading of the monoline insurers, which do not deserve the AAA rating on which their business depends. A further $150bn writedown of asset-backed securities would then ensue. Step five would be the meltdown of the commercial property market, while, Step six would be bankruptcy of a large regional or national bank. Step seven would be big losses on reckless leveraged buy-outs. Hundreds of billions of dollars of such loans are now stuck on the balance sheets of financial institutions. Step eight would be a wave of corporate defaults. On average, US companiesare in decent shape, but a "fat tail" of companies has low profitability andheavy debt. Such defaults would spread losses in "credit default swaps", which insure such debt. The losses could be $250bn. Some insurers might go bankrupt. Step nine would be a meltdown in the "shadow financial system". Dealing with the distress of hedge funds, special investment vehicles and so forth will be made more difficult by the fact that they have no direct access to lending from central banks. Step 10 would be a further collapse in stock prices. Failures of hedge funds, margin calls and shorting could lead to cascading falls in prices. Step 11 would be a drying-up of liquidity in a range of financial markets, including interbank and money markets. Behind this would be a jump in concerns about solvency. Step 12 would be "a vicious circle of losses, capital reduction, credit contraction, forced liquidation and fire sales of assets at below fundamental prices". These, then, are 12 steps to meltdown. In all, argues Prof Roubini: "Total losses in the financial system will add up to more than $1,000bn and the economic recession will become deeper more protracted and severe." This, he suggests, is the "nightmare scenario" keeping Ben Bernanke and colleagues at the US Federal Reserve awake. It explains why, having failed to appreciate the dangers for so long, the Fed has lowered rates by 200 basis points this year. This is insurance against a financial meltdown. Is this kind of scenario at least plausible? It is. Furthermore, we can be confident that it would, if it came to pass, end all stories about de-coupling". If it lasts six quarters, as Prof Roubini warns, offsetting policy action in the rest of the world would be too little, too late. Can the Fed head this danger off? In a subsequent piece, Prof Roubini gives eight reasons why it cannot***. (He really loves lists!) These are, in brief: US monetary easing is constrained by risks to the dollar and inflation; aggressive easing deals only with illiquidity, not insolvency; the monoline insurers will lose their credit ratings, with dire consequences overall losses will be too large for sovereign wealth funds to deal with; public intervention is too small to stabilise housing losses; the Fed cannotaddress the problems of the shadow financial system; regulators cannot finda good middle way between transparency over losses and regulatory forbearance, both of which are needed; and, finally, the transactions-oriented financial system is itself in deep crisis. The risks are indeed high and the ability of the authorities to deal with them more limited than most people hope. This is not to suggest that there are no ways out. Unfortunately, they are poisonous ones. In the last resort,governments resolve financial crises. This is an iron law. Rescues can occur via overt government assumption of bad debt, inflation, or both. Japan chosethe first, much to the distaste of its ministry of finance. But Japan is a creditor country whose savers have complete confidence in the solvency of the government. The US, however, is a debtor. It must keep the trust of foreigners. Should it fail to do so, the inflationary solution becomes probable. This is quite enough to explain why gold costs $920 an ounce. The connection between the bursting of the housing bubble and the fragility of the financial system has created huge dangers, for the US and the rest of the world. The US public sector is now coming to the rescue, led by the Fed. In the end, they will succeed. But the journey is likely to be wretchedly uncomfortable. *A Coming Recession in the US Economy? July 17 2006, www.rgemonitor.com ; **The Rising Risk of a Systemic Financial Meltdown, February 5 2008; ***Can the Fed and Policy Makers Avoid a Systemic Financial Meltdown? Most Likely Not, February 8 2008

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

WELCOME TO TEHRAN ! (Video)

Rap words enumerate the following ideas depicted in the graphics: Welcome to poverty stricken residents sifting for food in garbage dumps, to addicts trying to escape the misery imposed by the bloody regime, to the hundreds of thousands of homeless and HOPELESS residents. To the daily brutal arrests and executions, to Islamic paradise on earth. If so, then what is Hell? Other new videos posted on Videos Section. http://alanpetersvideos.blogspot.com/

Monday, February 18, 2008

NON-INTELLIGENCE ON IRAN NUKES & Appalling Gamesmanship at the CIA

Alan Note: I have not seen much in the Media about the purloined laptop obtained from inside Iran which proves Iran is working on nuclear weapons. Why the silence? Also as a sidebar, read the article on the "News Views" Page titled Dhimmi England Seeks Sharia Bonds. It's not just the Archbishop of Canterbury pushing for Shaira law recognition. The Prime Minister is also lunging in that direction. http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/ Main Article by Michael Rubin During his February 5 testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell backpedaled from the December 2007 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) and its claim that, "in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program." Not only did McConnell testify that the Islamic Republic was working to master the enrichment of uranium - "the most difficult challenge in nuclear production" - but he also acknowledged that, "because of intelligence gaps," the U.S. government could not be certain that the Iranian government had fully suspended its covert nuclear programs. "We assess with high confidence that Iran has the scientific, technical, and industrial capacity eventually to produce nuclear weapons," he testified. "In our judgment, only an Iranian political decision to abandon a nuclear weapons objective would plausibly keep Iran from eventually producing nuclear weapons - and such a decision is inherently reversible." The NIE was no accident, and McConnell's pirouette does more than confirm the intelligence community's sloppiness. The 2007 NIE was built on geopolitical assumptions as much as any hard intelligence, and historians will deem it important not because it was accurate, but because it made utterly clear the collapse of the intelligence community. While the crudeness of its assault on the (U.S.) president's Iran policy makes it the best example of the intelligence community's agenda politics, it is far from the only one. My initiation into CIA policy plays came less than a week after Baghdad's fall to coalition forces in April 2003. In the months before the war, U.S. government officials had assessed thousands of Iraqi political activists and technocrats in order to prepare to fill the Iraqi political vacuum. Representatives from State, the Pentagon, and the National Security Council were meeting to vet invitations for the Nasiriya Conference where Iraqis would discuss post-liberation governance. Rather than simply present the biographies of the various Iraqi figures, the CIA sought to be a privileged policy player. Its representative announced that not only would Langley be inviting its own candidates outside the interagency consensus, but the CIA would not be sharing the names or backgrounds of its invitees. Putting aside the ridiculousness of the CIA belief that it could invite delegates anonymously to a public conference, more troubling was the principle. Far from limiting its work to intelligence, the CIA leadership was unabashedly involving itself in major policy initiatives. The reverberations of Langley's policy games haunted reconstruction. CIA officials would promise governorships to Iraqis without any coordination. Often, diplomats, military officials, and Pentagon civilians would learn of such deals only after other Iraqis had been appointed or elected to such offices. (Some U.S. servicemen surely paid the price as spurned Iraqis responded to what they saw as betrayal.) Once the son of a Kurdish leader remarked how ridiculous State-Defense bickering was when the CIA had implemented and funded a decision on the policy issue months before without any coordination whatsoever. Many of the agency's (CYA deskjockey) senior analysts are arrogant after years behind their computers, believing they know far better what U.S. policy should be than the policymakers for whom they draft reports. The recourse of the disgruntled, bored, or politicized analyst is the leak - the bread and butter of any national security correspondent. Journalists who fulfill the leakers' objectives win ever more tantalizing scoops; those who maintain professional integrity and question the agenda behind any leak, find their access cut. The result is a situation in which journalists who might otherwise double-check sources, take a single intelligence analyst at his word, even if he is using them to fight a policy battle. Iraq again provides a case study. In order to shield themselves from accountability over flawed intelligence or to bolster their Iraqi proxies at the expense of competitors, CIA officials provided a steady stream of leaks to favored correspondents like the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh or McClatchy's Warren Strobel. Such leaks ranged from allegations that the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans - a policy shop - was a rogue intelligence operation to misattributions of the provenance of prewar intelligence. It was not uncommon, for example, to see false or exaggerated intelligence attributed to the Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmad Chalabi when it had actually come from Kurdish officials. This was never more clear than in a July 17, 2004, New York Times correction. The paper was retracting three stories which alleged a connection between Chalabi and an Iraqi source code-named Curveball, whose information later turned out to be bogus. The editors explained that their correspondent had "attribute[d] that account to American intelligence officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. " They continued: "Those officials now say that there was no such established relationship." In other words, intelligence officials lied to a reporter to achieve a policy aim. Such behavior is not limited to debates over policies impacting countries thousands of miles away. W. Patrick Lang, a former Defense Intelligence Agency official, told the American Prospect in 2005 that his intelligence community colleagues used leaks to try to influence the 2004 presidential election. "Of course they were leaking. They told me about it at the time. They thought it was funny. They'd say things like, 'This last thing that came out, surely people will pay attention to that. They won't reelect this man.' " The intelligence leadership did not refer the matter to the judiciary, unlike the leak concerning Valerie Plame. To deflect criticism of the NIE, intelligence officials reached out to reporters. "Hundreds of officials were involved and thousands of documents were drawn upon in this report .  .  . making it impossible for any official to overly sway it," the Wall Street Journal was told. Wayne White, a former analyst in State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, suggested it was "absolutely disgusting" that anyone could impugn the professionalism of lead author (and his former colleague) Thomas Fingar. This is disingenuous. Personnel are policy. Half of Washington's battles involve who writes the first and last drafts of any paper or memo. McConnell's testimony undercut the idea that the intelligence agencies deserve a reputation for either professionalism or integrity. A tolerance for political gamesmanship has besmirched the entire community. With the NIE giving Iran what President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared its "greatest victory during the past 100 years," the consequence for U.S. national security is grave. In the wake of the Iraq war, many Democrats accused the Bush administration of politicizing intelligence. It was a false charge, but good politics. But the fact is, the problem was the opposite: an intelligence community driven by the desire to conduct policy. Michael Rubin, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and editor of the Middle East Quarterly, was an Iran country director at the Pentagon between September 2002 and April 2004.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

TRUE PALESTINE & PALESTINIAN

MUST READ - USE LINK BELOW TRUE PALESTINE & MEANING OF THE WORD PALESTINIAN click here

Saturday, February 16, 2008

TERRORISM & GANGS LIKE MS-13

Alan Note: terror organizations like Al Qaeda and Islamic Jihadists of various ilks began using Hispanic gangs in the USA for logistics, transfering items and people (many terrorists resemble Hispanics) with a lower profile and using the knowledge of the gangs. Police and anti-gang authorities might recognize a vehicle as "gang related" and not realize that it was also doing the work of terrorists. Gangs became "agents for hire" for Islamists but resisted getting involved in killings. Till now. MS-13 thrives on violence and killings, so have added an "internal" capacity for overseas terrorists with enough money. Specially, as many of these, including the Islamic Iranian government have set up bases throughout South America to deal/smuggle illegal drugs and organize a "killing machine" within the USA. The increasingly better organized, unholy alliance, by the proponents of religion of "peace" will become apparent when Islam orders retaliation within our shores. School children, shopping malls, electricity grids, infrastructure like railroads, even supermarkets will become prime "soft" targets to spread fear, deatha nd destruction. The local gangs know their territories like the back of their hands and provide invaluable operational information and logistical capabilty the terrorists would otherwise not have. Smuggling terrorists across our borders is just the tip of the iceberg of the gand & terror co-peration. 2008 They perpetrate violence—from assaults to homicides, using firearms, machetes, or blunt objects—to intimidate rival gangs, law enforcement, and the general public. They often target middle and high school students for recruitment. And they form tenuous alliances...and sometimes vicious rivalries...with other criminal groups, depending on their needs at the time. Who are they? Members of Mara Salvatrucha, better known as MS-13, who are mostly Salvadoran nationals or first generation Salvadoran-Americans, but also Hondurans, Guatemalans, Mexicans, and other Central and South American immigrants. And according to our recent national threat assessment of this growing, mobile street gang, they could be operating in your community...now or in the near future. Based on information from our own investigations, from our state and local law enforcement partners, and from community organizations, we’ve concluded that while the threat posed by MS-13 to the U.S. as a whole is at the "medium" level, membership in parts of the country is so concentrated that we've labeled the threat level there "high." Here are some other highlights from our threat assessment: MS-13 operates in at least 42 states and the District of Columbia and has about 6,000-10,000 members nationwide. Currently, the threat is highest in the western and northeastern parts of the country, which coincides with elevated Salvadoran immigrant populations in those areas. In the southeast and central regions, the current threat is moderate to low, but recently, we've seen an influx of MS-13 members into the southeast, causing an increase in violent crimes there. For More Information - Going Global on MS-13 - MS-13 Up Close - FBI Violent Gangs Website MS-13 members engage in a wide range of criminal activity, including drug distribution, murder, rape, prostitution, robbery, home invasions, immigration offenses, kidnapping, carjackings/auto thefts, and vandalism. Most of these crimes, you'll notice, have one thing in common—they are exceedingly violent. And while most of the violence is directed toward other MS-13 members or rival street gangs, innocent citizens often get caught in the crossfire. MS-13 is expanding its membership at a "moderate" rate through recruitment and migration. Some MS-13 members move to get jobs or to be near family members—currently, the southeast and the northeast are seeing the largest increases in membership. MS-13 often recruits new members by glorifying the gang lifestyle (often on the Internet, complete with pictures and videos) and by absorbing smaller gangs. Speaking of employment, MS-13 members typically work for legitimate businesses by presenting false documentation. They primarily pick employers that don't scrutinize employment documents, especially in the construction, restaurant, delivery service, and landscaping industries. Right now, MS-13 has no official national leadership structure. MS-13 originated in Los Angeles, but when members migrated eastward, they began forming cliques that for the most part operated independently. These cliques, though, often maintain regular contact with members in other regions to coordinate recruitment/criminal activities and to prevent conflicts. We do believe that Los Angeles gang members have an elevated status among their MS-13 counterparts across the country, a system of respect that could potentially evolve into a more organized national leadership structure. One final word about MS-13: the FBI, through its MS-13 National Joint Task Force and field investigations, remains committed to working with our local, state, national, and international partners to disrupt and dismantle this violent gang. Note: the assessment is law enforcement sensitive and is not publicly available. 2006 FBI exec James "Chip" Burrus observes photos of detained gang members at the second annual Gang Enforcement Conference in San Salvador. The FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division chief recently did some intelligence gathering of his own on MS-13, a violent gang that is sowing fear and crime in communities in 33 states. James “Chip” Burrus spent three days in El Salvador to learn how officials there are battling the scourge before it becomes a bigger problem here. Burrus was among about 100 FBI and U.S. law enforcement officials attending the second annual Gang Enforcement Conference in San Salvador in early April. The event, viewed as invaluable for its insights into the ways of MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha, was attended by top officials from Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Nicargua, Honduras, and El Salvador, where the gang originated in the late 80s. During the three-day conference, each country spoke at length about how they wage battle against MS-13 cliques, as they are called, which carve poor neighborhoods into territories and trade heavily in extortion and murder. “What it did for me is it gave me an insight of what the gang looks like not only in El Salvador and Central American countries, but what it perhaps looks like here,” Burrus said. “How do they make money down there? What is their structure? It helps me be a little more predictive in placing resources.” The FBI has been placing more and more resources on the front lines of the MS-13 problem. There are an estimated 10,000 MS-13 gang members in the U.S. and five times as many in the countries that attended the conference. In 2004, the FBI created the MS-13 National Gang Task Force. In 2005, the FBI helped create a National Gang Information Center and outlined a National Gang Strategy for Congress. Last year, the MS-13 task force coordinated a series of arrests and crackdowns in the U.S and Central America that involved more than 6,000 police officers in five countries. Seventy-three suspects were arrested in the U.S.; in all, more than 650 were taken into custody. Burrus’ visit took him beyond the conference meeting rooms where officials traded tactics and methods on panels and in break-out groups. In an armored van with a lead escort and Salvadoran sharp-shooters at the ready, Burrus rode deep into a neighborhood where the “maras,” or gang members, hold sway. “It was an eye-opening experience to see what it could come to at some point here if we don’t do our jobs correctly,” Burrus said. “It’s a much bigger problem for them because it’s rooted there. What were trying to prevent is for them to get historically rooted here in the U.S.” Burrus’ tour also took him to El Salvador’s intelligence center—where a few resourceful police enter reports, interviews, and intelligence into a handful of old computers that comprise a surprisingly effective database. Burrus is exploring ways to bolster the law enforcement link with El Salvador—with training or technology. Fingerprinting MS-13 members in Salvadoran prisons—and linking those prints to the FBI database—could go a long way to stopping them before they enter the U.S, Burrus said. “There’s such freedom of movement between El Salvador and the United States. So there’s a real need for an exchange of information between the two countries—what’s working and what’s not.”

OTHER NEW ARTICLES

NEW ARTICLES ADDITIONALLY POSTED ON "NEWS VIEWS", "WORLD VIEWS", "RUTHLESS ROUNDUPS" AND "MULTILINGUAL" PAGES (links in left hand column of this Home Page). Enjoy your weekend and the reads.

IRAN OIL EXCHANGE OPENS TODAY FEB 17TH

Alan note: another, relentless inching forward by Soviet Putin to control Iran (see second article below, too) Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, the world's fourth-largest oil producer, may use the Russian Ruble currency in trading on its new oil exchange, the country's ambassador to Moscow said. "Big energy producers like Iran and Russia should try to free the world of dollar slavery," Ambassador Gholamreza Ansari said on Moscow's Ekho Moskvy radio station today. The two nations already cooperate in nuclear energy and may start closer coordination of natural-gas production. Russia holds the world's largest gas reserves, followed by Iran, and together they produce of almost a fifth of the world's oil. The two share the goal of finding alternatives to a weakened U.S. dollar. Iran plans to trade oil in more currencies than in its own rial to offer diversity, the ambassador said. The exchange will open Feb. 17, the country's official IRNA news service said this week. Iran has planned to open the exchange since 2005. "I don't think it would have any impact on the oil market at all," said Kevin Norrish, an oil markets analyst at Barclays Capital in London. "I think it's more political than related to oil market prices or dynamics." The ruble should be used as a "regional reserve currency," Russian First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said earlier today in Krasnoyarsk, Siberia. Medvedev, who is also chairman of Russian gas exporter OAO Gazprom, is the front-runner to replace President Vladimir Putin in March 2 elections. "The role of key reserve currencies is being reconsidered. We must take advantage of this," Medvedev said in a speech outlining his economic priorities. Russia and other natural-gas producing countries should also form a group to coordinate production and sales of the fuel "as soon as possible," Ansari said. Iran a year ago proposed to set up a gas cartel similar to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

MULTILINGUAL GOOGLE TRANSLATIONS

CHECK OUT THE ANTIMULLAH HOME PAGE IN VARIOUS LANGUAGES ON THE MULTILINGUAL PAGE (LINK IN LEFT HAND COLUMN) OR CLICK HERE IT'S "MACHINE TRANSLATION" WITHOUT HUMAN POLISH BUT PROVIDES A GOOD GIST OF THE ARTICLES FOR THOSE WHOSE ENGLISH STILL NEEDS HELP.

"SOVIET" PUTIN INCHING CLOSER TO DOMINATING IRAN

The late Shah of Iran lost his throne twice, once to falsely lauded "nationalist" Dr. Mossadegh (acting on behalf of the Soviets) and the second time, again on behalf of the Soviets, orchestrating it from their Tehran Embassy, to the Marxist-Islamists Mojaheddin & Fedayeen, from whom the Mullahs usurped it. Old "Mossyface" as many called Mossadegh, always pretended to be ill and even received foreign dignitaries when he was Prime Minister lying on an army cot or wrapped in a military blanket. In the video below, he drags his "ill" persona into court for his trial, the poor little victim. Then forgets his role and jumps up and down gesticulating in excitement. He was sentenced by the Shah's courts to only THREE YEARS in prison for plotting and conducting the overthrow of the legal monarchy, whereas those who now rule (Mullahs) thanks to peanut Carter, have been executing (hanging) someone convicted of having been caught having consumed alcoholic drinks THREE TIMES. The first time, if very lucky, he gets some physical abuse, a warning and perhaps some prison time, the second time the standard 80 lashes and the third time he/she HANGS by the neck till dead. Interesting to note: nearly all supply of illegal drugs and alcohol to the Iranian populace is a virtual monopoly of the Mullahs and their henchmen. As interesting a factoid is the absolutely false claim by Mossy's supporters , then and now, of Mossy having a nationalistic "democracy" in mind. To the contrary, he brooked no argument nor advice from anyone and was an absolute dictator in running his government by virtual decree. Finally, overthrowing the Constitution to make it easier to rule this way and favor the Soviets, something the Shah strongly opposed. Never was it on behalf of the people.

As one of his major Socialist/Communist supporters admitted recently, the political "freedom" they demanded of the Shah was not for the populace but for their own, "imported" Soviet philosphy and freedom to have a Communist Iran.

Even today, "Soviet" Putin has some 50,000 Russian advisors inside Iran, every Islamic government agency or office seems to have one attached to it. Providing a revenue of some $100 million a MONTH to Russia, the way Mexicans, legal or otherwise, send money home from the USA. An example of Mossy's absolute control was when one of the Farmanfarmaian family (of the pre-Pahlavi, Qajar dynasty) suggested that he follow the example of another country which was making huge profits from the way it handled its oil. Instead of listening, the highly irritable, suddenly incensed Prime Minister considered the advice as criticism, threw the man out of his office and later ordered his arrest! Fearing for his life, this member of a prominent family ran to the Shah and asked for a passport with which to leave the country before Mossy caused him grievous harm. The next day, on the monarch's orders, a military Colonel brought a passport and escorted the man to the airport and ensured his safe passage out of the country. Bad, bad, Shah! Poor, kind, democratic, nationalist Mossy! What nonsense. Mossy was about to hand Iran and its oil to Soviet control and a path to warm waters for their navy and the USA and the West removed him before he could achieve his aims and rescued Iran from total Soviet domination. So it was again the bad, bad Shah's fault! Had the West not restored him to the throne, history would have been very different for Western interests and the well being of Iran's populace (minus the pro-Soviet . Communist Tudeh party), who continued to plot the overthrow of the government on behalf of the Soviets, often ending up in prison for sedition. Had idiot Carter, considered by more than you might know, as a Soviet mole, not again destabilized the Shah, we would not be facing ANY of the Islamic problems that threaten us today and might even end up destroying us.

DHIMMIS IN OUR SENIOR GOVERNMENT CRIPPLING OUR ANTI-TERROR EFFORTS

This is a first hand comment about the Pentagon's Edelman who was formerly U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and is taking the Islamic side in the controversy of firing an expert on Islam by Deputy Defense Secretary , Dhimmi Gordon england at the urging of his favorite Islamic aide. Gives us great insight: (name redacted) "When I was assigned to Turkey, I nearly became dhimized, in the beginning. For me, it started with weekend tours to see the architectural splendor of several of the mosques in Istanbul. [They are truly splendid, and in all of the world - Islamic architecture is undoubtedly some of the finest. This is the only contribution Islam has made to the world in general, and the Taj Mahal.] An American diplomat, I was feted by some Turks, and invited to a mosque near my apartment where I was very well treated, and the imam, in fluent English, indoctrinated me on the splendor and wonders of Islam. It was really good. I've had Russians (KGB and NKVD) and others try to get to me, and to compromise me. None were ever as smooth as these Turks. I studied Turkish, and made friends with Turks at Istanbul University, and was intellectually stimulated. I met often with them and practiced my Turkish with them. There were regular and very ugly anti-American demonstrations outside of the American consulate too, and I saw another side of the Turks. I got caught up in a very ugly anti-American demonstration once. And, I was holding several TOP SECRET diplomatic pouches at the time, full of CIA materials...... My Turkish driver, my Turkish clothes, and my following his instructions saved my life. The CIA chief was in an accident, and got beaten badly by Turks. When his wife stepped out of their car to assist him, she was held and then kicked in the crotch several times. So severely that she suffered a broken pelvis. Another colleague was in an accident. Rear-ended. At a stop sign. He was found to be at fault!!!!!!! ........, a kafir, and a black American at that............ Four Turks attacked me on a darkened dead end road one evening. They had knives and were either planning to geld me or behead me, I'm not sure. I grew up in a blue collar neighborhood in (city redacted), in the industrial/mill and foundries part of town, two blocks from railroad switchyards. Those streets were tough. They made Gary, Indiana look sweet. Among other things, I boxed in the golden gloves and went to the national championships where Cassius Clay kicked my ass. I'm here. They're not. I had a length of logging chain with a heavy lock attached....... It took three days before my adrenalin to wind down. If one doesn't bow down in dhimmitude, while in Turkey, one is in real danger. Edleman was/is a quavering coward who bowed to the Turks, and is still on his dhimmi knees.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

AA12 - THE REAL SHOTGUN & DEADLY LEMONS

Military version of the original "street sweeper". What a great weapon for your neighborhood survival protection if law enforcement breaks down and chaos reigns. Overkill for this next enemy.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

ISLAMIC IRAN'S MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY (MOIS) "SNITCH" PROMO

CLICK ON TITLE TO VIEW MEMRI VIDEO - FARSI WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES. John McCain is used as the President of the USA in this encouragement video to phone "113" and snitch on family, friends or anyone else. WOULDN'T IT BE FUN IF PEOPLE WITH ENOUGH PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT MEMBERS OF THE ISLAMIC ELITE AND TORTURERS CALLED IN FAKE STORIES ABOUT THEM OR THEIR FAMILIES? CAUTION, ALL PHONES IN IRAN ARE MONITORED SO LOCALS WOULD HAVE TO BE CAREFUL. But like bomb threats and scares, organized efforts coordinated to use similar information and cast doubts on some of the elite families, could prove confusing or pehaps devastating if done well at a time when loyalties are no longer too stable. Paramilitary but excellently equipped Revolutionary Guards, who play the prime military role after the regime has more or less disarmed the formal armed forces, have come under scrutiny as their rank and file loyalties have come under suspicion as the economy and the mismanagement of Ahmadi-Nejad (aka the Turd) have created dissatisfaction. The Bassiji "Suppression" force commander, has very unusually been put in command over both operations. SADLY our CYA, except for some brave, on site operatives, is too busy playing corporate desk jockey to do much in the way of even simple psyops. Our Pentagon is infiltrated with Islamic influentials at the highest levels, so nothing much covert could go down. And the Senate and Congress at the Federal and State levels have their share of Islamic spies and obstruction to any anti-Mullah operations. Despite Iran's claims that these are in progress against the Islamic regime. buying four bomb-sniffing guard dogs for the President and violently suppressing people through executions seem to be the extent of their reaction. Oh! Sorry. Promoting the 113 phone number. However, to reverse myself - in fairness - if I were one of the desk jockeys, I would point to the current action by MOIS to "prove" they were being very active inside Iran. I wish this were true, And understand they cannot announce what they are doing. Not even when they leak to the Press to hurt Bush. What a mess.

THE BIG PICTURE ON ISLAMIC INFLUENCE INSIDE PENTAGON

CLICK ON TITLE OF ARTICLE TO GO TO IN DEPTH, EXCLUSIVE ANALYSIS AND DETAILS OF THE CONNECTIONS OF IDIOTIC DEPUTY DEFENSE SECRETARY GORDON ENGLAND, CONNECTIONS TO FORMER STATE DEPT., TURKISH ENVOYS AND SANDY BURGER'S DESTRUCTION OF SECRET DOCUMENTS. MUST READ! QUICK READ - ARTICLE BELOW THIS ONE SIDEBAR COMMENT ON ISLAM February 6 -- Radio Farda interviewed lawyer Shirin Ebadi [text in Persian], who said it is now clear that the officers investigated in the death of Zahra Bani Yaghoub, who died in custody in October after being detained by morality police, were illiterate. Ebadi asked, "How can those who cannot even read or write and consequently know nothing of the law become judicial officers and bring about such catastrophes by their ignorance?" Alan Note: How can someone like this lawyer, a Nobel laureate like Jimmuh Carter, who owed everything she has to the monarchy, become such a traitor and the Mullah stalking horse and "cover" to show that there is a "normal" justice system in Iran. Except the Mullahs have ordered her to limit her activism to women's causes and avoid anything else or they will break her other leg. Nobel laureate like Jimmuh Carter

Monday, February 11, 2008

PENTAGON MOSLEM AIDE TO STEP DOWN

Muslim aide to Deputy Secretary of Defense to step down: "He's a Muslim Brother" DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE GORDON ENGLAND SHOULD ALSO RESIGN OR BE FIRED - FOR BEING AN IDIOTIC FACILITATOR OF THIS SITUATION. Good news in this Hesham Islam Update. "Embattled Muslim aide to leave Pentagon job: Hesham Islam's 'resume didn't add up,' official says," from WorldNetDaily (thanks to all who sent this in): In a stunning turn of events, a high-level Muslim military aide blamed for costing an intelligence contractor his job will step down from his own Pentagon post, WND has learned. Meanwhile, his rival, Maj. Stephen Coughlin, a leading authority on Islamic war doctrine, may stay in the Pentagon, moving from the office of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the office of the secretary of defense. However, sources say a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey is trying to block his new contract. (INDOCTRINATED INTO iSLAM WHILE SERVING THERE?) The top Pentagon aide, Egyptian-born Hesham H. Islam, came under a cloud of suspicion after reports raised doubt about his resume and contacts he had made with radical Muslims. He is expected to leave the government next month, officials say. Islam and Coughlin recently quarreled over intelligence briefings Coughlin presented showing a close connection between the religion of Islam and terrorism. Coughlin's contract with the Joint Chiefs, which ends in March, was not renewed. But as a result of the ensuing firestorm that played out in the conservative press – led by Washington Times Pentagon reporter Bill Gertz – Islam was put under a microscope, and questions were raised regarding his background. For example, Claudia Rosett of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies wrote a column challenging key claims in Islam's official biography. Within days, a Defense Department profile of Islam was removed from the department's website. A Pentagon spokesman said it was "taken down in an attempt to reduce the rhetoric and the emotion surrounding this issue while we try to determine the facts." A senior U.S. official says the life story Islam presented now appears sketchy. (WE ARE TERRIBLE AT DOING GOOD BACKGROUND CHECKS SO HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED TIME AND AGAIN) "His resume didn't add up, and he knows it," the official said. "He's voluntarily leaving the government in March." At the same time, a report by terror expert Steven Emerson revealed that Islam, as special assistant to the deputy secretary of defense, has scheduled at least two meetings in the Pentagon with Syrian-tied radicals – including a leading member of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood – in direct violation of U.S. policy. As WND previously reported, FBI officials believe Islam is involved with the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and is helping its front groups run "influence operations" against the U.S. government. "He's a Muslim brother," an FBI official told WND. "He's a bad actor, and he's made other unreported nefarious contacts." Islam has worked closely in the Pentagon with Muslim chaplain Abuhena M. Saifulislam, who as WND also previously reported, received his training at a radical Islamic school in Northern Virginia that was raided by federal authorities after 9/11. Islam, whose son is active in the military, obtained one of the highest security clearances for classified information. Sources confirm he has sat in on Pentagon meetings in which intelligence clearance was restricted at the Top Secret/SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information) level. The Pentagon had no comment. And Islam, who has not been accused of any crimes, has refused interviews. Emerson says Islam prescribed a steady diet of Muslim Brotherhood-connected outreach for his unwitting boss, deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England.... Pentagon insiders say Eric S. Edelman, undersecretary of defense for policy, has sought to stop the awarding of a new contract to Coughlin. Edelman served as ambassador to Turkey from 2003 to 2005. Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., who co-chairs the House Anti-Terrorism Caucus, has been fighting to keep Coughlin in the Pentagon, where she says his blunt analysis of the Islamic enemy is sorely needed.... "I know that some people will refuse to admit there is a subversive movement going on here, but let me remind you that we have underestimated the will and capability of our enemy for more than 30 years," she added. "They are patient and determined to achieve their radical agenda." Indeed.

OBAMA'S HOUSTON OFFICE & CHE GUEVARA FLAG ON WALL


In case you don't believe this photo CLICK on the TITLE of this post and watch the beginning of the VIDEO, showing that office.

HOWEVER! Obama still light years better than Clinton. Just not to be trusted enough to be our Commander in Chief. Neither is Hillary.

THOUGH IT WOULD BE NICE FOR A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO WANTS TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF TO RESPECT OUR ANTHEM and hold his heart not his gonads

Sunday, February 10, 2008

WAR TO REACH MOSLEM MINDS - AN OXYMORON

Excellent Read on Terror News Page CLICK HERE

PUBLIC CALL FOR DEATH TO THE ISLAMIC REGIME ON ANNIVERSARY OF REVOLUTION (VIDEO)

CLICK ON TITLE TO VIEW VIDEO
Anti-Islamic Iran regime slogans call for the death of the clerics but in fact it is death BY the Mullahs. Some 40 people have been executed already in 2008 - about one a day. For those who think this is an escalation, in 2003, some 40 people were executed in January alone. Death by Mullahs has been a constant in Islamic Iran, no matter who is the President. The current regime has become worse by the hidden, unreported executions and murders by torture or taking people they don't like into the desert and shooting them to death. HERE, TOO, NOT IN A HUMANE WAY! The victims are loosely bound and the executioners then shoot them in the foot, then the other, then the shins, then the knees, then gradually up the body. Ensuring the maximum possible pain before death releases them. Thousands disappear every year, very often dying in this manner. Where are the bodies? Everywhere in the wastelands, left to feed the wild, carnivore or scavenger beasts. OR in the thousands of unmarked graves that condemned prisoners are forced to dig all over the country in a forced labor aspect of their prison terms. Or prior to being executed themselves. Hey! Obama! You want to talk to and negotiate with THIS regime? Are you nuts or just going back to your Moslem roots? Hey! Liberal Democrats, what do you not understand here? Hey! America, wake up to the real Islam you wish to appease and accept. THEY cannot accept YOU by the very tenets of their so-called "religious" beliefs. You are hoping a leopard changes it spots! It will not, CANNOT happen, so get REAL! When Khomeini first took over, this was also the most common method firing squads used against the former regime senior officers. One of these, 3-star Air Force General Nader Jahanbani, whose self-respect and pride was never shaken by his captors, died with great bravery. He was lucky that he was executed by someone who still respected him. His uniform, possessed by his wife, has only one bullet hole - where it penetrated his heart and made his death merciful. CLICK ON TITLE/SUBJECT TO VIEW VIDEO (FARSI) but visually easy to understand the call to arise and remove the bloodthirsty, "taazi" (Arab Moslem invader), plague on innocents, Islamic Regime. Protest meetings are planned in Washington DC and Los Angeles. California on Sunday February 10th, in front of the Los Angeles Federal Building in Westwood. 29th Anniversary Flyer

Saturday, February 09, 2008

MULTICULTURALISM IN BRITAIN & VIDEO at the end

Senior religious leaders attack multiculturalism and sharia law today, warning that they are "disastrous", socially divisive and are destroying Britain's culture and values. Lord Carey and Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor rebut the call of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, for Islamic law to be recognised in Britain. Lord Carey, the former archbishop of Canterbury, said: "His acceptance of some Muslim laws within British law would be disastrous for the nation. He has overstated the case for accommodating Islamic legal codes. "His conclusion that Britain will eventually have to concede some place in law for aspects of sharia is a view I cannot share. "There can be no exceptions to the laws of our land which have been so painfully honed by the struggle for democracy and human rights." In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, said that the Government's promotion of multiculturalism had destroyed the unity that used to hold society together. Immigrants must "obey the laws of this country". Writing in this newspaper, Lord Carey condemns multiculturalism as "disastrous", blames it for creating Islamic ghettos and says that Dr Williams's support for sharia law will "inevitably lead to further demands from the Muslim community". He suggests that such a move could embolden some Muslims to try to turn Britain into a country ruled by Islamic law which, he says, contradicts principles of human rights and allows the persecution of Christians. Their comments will come as a blow to the embattled archbishop, who is experiencing the darkest days of his six years as leader of the Anglican Church, following his claim that the adoption of certain aspects of sharia law is "unavoidable". It also marks a deepening of the rift between Dr Williams and leading church figures over his support for Islamic law. The Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, said that it would be "simply impossible" to have two different legal systems. Dr Williams sought to defend his comments yesterday, but is fighting to survive calls from politicians and members of his church demanding his resignation. The vast majority of the Church's ruling body believe he was wrong, a Sunday Telegraph poll shows. The survey of the General Synod found that only three per cent agreed that aspects of Islamic law should be adopted. Four per cent said he should resign, but two thirds rejected claims that he had lost credibility. A number of bishops have spoken out against the attacks on the archbishop, but a far greater number, including the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, have chosen to distance themselves from the issue. Dr Williams argued that Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". However, Lord Carey says the potential damage of Dr Williams's idea of incorporating sharia courts into civil law "does not bear thinking about". He says that it would be dangerous and would encourage some Muslims to try to turn Britain into an Islamic state. The former archbishop says that accommodating sharia law would lead to further demands. "This is absolutely inevitable, since questions to do with the separation of ‘church and state' are largely new to Islam. Sharia law trumps civil law every time." He adds: "Many Muslim interpreters of sharia believe that it supersedes secular law and assume that its ‘God-given' status would lead to the point of eventually replacing civil law." According to Lord Carey, sharia law disadvantages women and minorities, contradicts principles of human rights and has led to the persecution of Christians in countries such as Nigeria, where churches have been burned down. Dr Williams's endorsement of "a legal marketplace in which people opt in and out based on religious affiliation opens the door to a parallel system of justice", he writes. "The question which must be asked is whether the separate systems promote harmony or continue the creation of ghettos for Muslim communities — the result of disastrous policies of multiculturalism." The archbishop had argued that the introduction of parts of Islamic law would help improve social cohesion, but Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor joined Lord Carey in attacking this idea and urged Muslims to do more to integrate. "The extent to which multiculturalism has been encouraged recently has meant a lessening of the kind of unity that a country needs," he told this newspaper. "There are common values which are part of the heritage of this country which should be embraced by everybody. "I don't believe in a multi-cultural society. When people come into this country they have to obey the laws of the land." He says that sharia law clashes with British culture and stresses that the Government must act to stop the acceptance of foreign practices. Last week, this newspaper revealed that men with multiple wives had been given the go-ahead by ministers to claim extra welfare benefits. "The laws of this country don't allow forced marriages or polygamy," Lord Carey writes. "A government and a country has a right to make sure those laws are kept." Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, the shadow minister for community cohesion, said that setting up rival systems of law would alienate sections of society and may lead to legal apartheid.

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT?? More Mysterious Dead Bodies?

Why are Americans stupid enough to even consider such a degenerate for PRESIDENT? It's more than frightening. Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her 'record,' which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady - or 'co-president' - and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes: As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Pat Moynahan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would demonize' anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn't even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.) Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as 'my worst mistake.' Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier's radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn. Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign. Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clinton's, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. (FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1996 both the drug use and Hillary' involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years.) In order to open 'slots' in the White House for her friends the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for 'gross mismanagement' and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours. Another of Hillary's assumed duties was directing the 'bimbo eruption squad' and scandal defense: She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all. And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury . And Bill was impeached by the House. And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, 'I do not recall,' 'I have no recollection,' and 'I don't know 56 times under oath). 'Hillary wrote 'It Takes a Village,' demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint. Hillary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother's clients, for a small fee, to get financial support. Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen. In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the 'woman card' by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her. Hillary's husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary's correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.) As the junior Senator from New York, Hillary has passed no major legislation. she has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11. Hillary's one notable vote, supporting the plan to invade Iraq, she has since disavowed. Quite a resume`, isn't it? Sounds more like an organized crime family... NOTE the dead bodies around them, too (named below) And what about her Girl Friday and constant companion, Huma Abedin's deep rooted family ties with Al Qaeda? How careless, idiotic or love struck do you have to be or how treasonous to allow this level of Al Qaeda access to secret and classified materials, even by indirect assimilation!!!??? But then remember that the Clintons had people without security clearances working at sensitive positions in the White House and refused requests to have their backgrounds checked. Are YOU, the voter, crazy enough to vote the "Billary" co-presidency back and invite disaster? Or do you not know what you are doing outside your narrow knowledge and information base? Insead of emotional reaction? What nobody seems to realize is the damage also encompasses a potential TOTAL destruction of our country: 1. The currently shaky Dollar is increasingly under attack by Iran’s Oil Exchange – which cannot be profitable for them financially by itself but loosens/disconnects the obligatory oil purchase in dollars, which then accelerates the potential crash, which currently appears to be verhy likely. Despite huge efforts by Central banks around the world. 2. Terrorist activity will follow us home if we withdraw from Iraq. Unlike Vietnam, the enemy SHALL come at us and our leaving Iraq will not appease them into inactivity. On the contrary, it becomes an invitation and encouragement to do so.

Unlike after the Korean or Vietnam wars, Islam (driven by their fanatical religious tenets and consequent politics) is dedicated to avenge the Crusades and force the infidels (you, me and ours) into subjugation - and life according to Islamic Sharia (religious) law.

Four years of active terrorism on our soil during a Hillary administration, a Dollar or global economical crash, where nobody can come to the rescue as did soup kitchens in the Great Depression, means we will be unable to “heal” our “wounds”. And shall “bleed” to death as a nation. While it also applies to McCain’s approach to immigration, a Democracy lasts an average of 200 years till the electorate eventally votes in those who give them the most freebies or pork barrel goodies. To a degree which then bleeds the country dry financially and into collapse. The USA is close to the slippery slope on that point. This time there could be as many as 100 MILLION or more of our citizens hungry and out of work with no help possible by our local, State or Federal governments as they become buried under the demands for help. To bring in Democrats at this stage, with their mindsets, like Moslem Obama intending to immediately withdraw from Iraq and talk to/appease Iran, will ensure this. Hojatieh (suicidal) Islamic Iran will simply accelarate their nuclear weapons programs, while "negotiating" with Obama or Hillary, (with US troops gone from Iraq and shortly later from Afghanistan) , step up their terrorist acitivities in the region and once they increase the number of ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads (beyond the half dozen or so aging nuclear warheads they obtained in the 90's), will threaten or actually destroy the whole world. In accordance with Hojatieh belief that they have to create so much destruction, pain, death and misery and suffering and oppression in this world that they get the attention of their spiritual icon, the 12th Imam, or Mehdi, who disappeared down a well as a teenage boy ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED YEARS AGO! And is believed by them to be the Redeemer, who will return and bring ISLAMIC justice and religion to the whole globe. And force us into submission to Allah. Back to politics, when/if we add about 20 million "illegals", new voters in an Amnesty bill, the new immigrants will certainly gradually vote themselves nation-crippling benefits and perks via their choice of local or Federal congressmen, governors or mayors etc., etc. And so you can say goodbye to a “viable” America in about five years at most. AntiMullah, opposes the Democrats for terrorism and survival reasons , rather than simply internal politics. Our survival has reached a critical mass and I’m not certain if we can win the anti-terror war, with Sharia law increasingly encroaching on our Western laws, adding to our problems. But we MUST fight the battles well. Put our best foot forward not the weakminded Democrats - where fighting a war on terrorism is concerned. The Democrats are not mentally “trained” or born to be able to do it. And Hillary's Socialist almost Communist political philosopy will not help her deal with the crises that loom on the horizon. Islam's tenets and Fascism, Communism and the Nazi mentality of Hitler's time all resemble each other much more closely than we understand. Islam's claim to be a "religion" rather than an "ism", Mohammadenism, fails to hold water, anymore than followers of any other "ism" can claim their "control-everyone-everything by force" agendas are a religion. Remember, the Islamic Iran revolution was carried out by Marxist-Islamists! Soviet driven Communists using Islam as the vehicle to attract followers. So the above is accurate. AND NEVER FORGET CLINTON BODY COUNT By: Ether Zone Staff Here is the latest body count that we have. All of these people have been connected with the Clintons in some form or another. We have not included any deaths that could not be verified or connected to the Clinton scandals. All deaths are listed chronologically by date. This list is current and accurate to the best of our knowledge as of January 13, 1999 August 1, 2000. Susan Coleman: Rumors were circulating in Arkansas of an affair with Bill Clinton. She was found dead with a gunshot wound to the head at 7 1/2 months pregnant. Death was an apparent suicide. Larry Guerrin: Was killed in February 1987 while investigating the INSLAW case. Kevin Ives & Don Henry: Initial cause of death was reported to be the result of falling asleep on a railroad track in Arkansas on August 23, 1987. This ruling was reported by the State medical examiner Fahmy Malak. Later it was determined that Kevin died from a crushed skull prior to being placed on the tracks. Don had been stabbed in the back. Rumors indicate that they might have stumbled upon a Mena drug operation. Keith Coney: Keith had information on the Ives/Henry deaths. Died in a motorcycle accident in July 1988 with unconfirmed reports of a high speed car chase. Keith McKaskle: McKaskle has information on the Ives/Henry deaths. He was stabbed to death in November 1988. Gregory Collins: Greg had information on the Ives/Henry deaths. He died from a gunshot wound to the face in January 1989. Jeff Rhodes: He had information on the deaths of Ives, Henry & McKaskle. His burned body was found in a trash dump in April 1989. He died of a gunshot wound to the head and there was some body mutilation, leading to the probably speculation that he was tortured prior to being killed. James Milam: Milam had information on the Ives & Henry deaths. He was decapitated. The state Medical examiner, Fahmy Malak, initially ruled death due to natural causes. Richard Winters: Winters was a suspect in the deaths of Ives & Henry. He was killed in a “robbery” in July 1989 which was subsequently proven to be a setup. Jordan Kettleson: Kettleson had information on the Ives & Henry deaths. He was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup in June 1990. Alan Standorf: An employee of the National Security Agency in electronic intelligence. Standorf was a source of information for Danny Casalaro who was investigating INSLAW, BCCI, etc. Standorf’s body was found in the backseat of a car at Washington National Airport on Jan 31, 1991. Dennis Eisman: An attorney with information on INSLAW. Eisman was found shot to death on April 5, 1991. Danny Casalaro: Danny was a free-lance reporter and writer who was investigating the “October Surprise”, INSLAW and BCCI. Danny was found dead in a bathtub in a Sheraton Hotel room in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Danny was staying at the hotel while keeping appointments in the DC area pertinent to his investigation. He was found with his wrists slashed. At least one, and possibly both of his wrists were cut 10 times. All of his research materials were missing and have never been recovered. Victor Raiser: The National Finance Co-Chair for “Clinton for President.” He died in a airplane crash on July 30, 1992. R. Montgomery Raiser: Also involved in the Clinton presidential campaign. He died in the same plane crash as Victor. Paul Tully: Tulley was on the Democratic National Committee. He was found dead of unknown causes in his hotel room on September 24, 1992. No autopsy was ever allowed. Ian Spiro: Spiro had supporting documentation for grand jury proceedings on the INSLAW case. His wife and 3 children were found murdered on November 1, 1992 in their home. They all died of gunshot wounds to the head. Ian’s body was found several days later in a parked car in the Borego Desert. Cause of death? The ingestion of cyanide. FBI report indicated that Ian had murdered his family and then committed suicide. Paula Gober: A Clinton speech writer. She died in a car accident on December 9, 1992 with no known witnesses. Jim Wilhite: Wilhite was an associate of Mack McClarty’s former firm. Wilhite died in a skiing accident on December 21, 1992. He also had extensive ties to Clinton with whom he visited by telephone just hours before his death. Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Todd McKeahan & Conway LeBleu: Died Feburary 28, 1993 by gunfire at Waco. All four were examined by a pathologist and died from identical wounds to the left temple. All four had been body guards for Bill Clinton, three while campaigning for President and when he was Governor of Arkansas.They also were the ONLY 4 BATF agents killed at Waco. Sgt. Brian Haney, Sgt. Tim Sabel, Maj. William Barkley, Capt. Scott Reynolds: Died: May 19, 1993 - All four men died when their helicopter crashed in the woods near Quantico, Va. - Reporters were barred from the site, and the head of the fire department responding to the crash described it by saying, “Security was tight,” with “lots of Marines with guns.” A videotape made by a firefighter was seized by the Marines. All four men had escorted Clinton on his flight to the carrier Roosevelt shortly before their deaths. John Crawford: An attorney with information on INSLAW. He died from a heart attack in Tacoma in April of 1993. John Wilson: Found dead from an apparent hanging suicide on May 18, 1993. He was a former Washington DC council member and claimed to have info on Whitewater. Paul Wilcher: A lawyer who was investigating drug running out of Mena, Arkansas and who also sought to expose the “October Surprise”, BCCI and INSLAW. He was found in his Washington DC apartment dead of unknown causes on June 22, 1993. Vincent Foster: A White House deputy counsel and long-time personal friend of Bill and Hillary’s. Found on July 20, 1993, dead of a gunshot wound to the mouth — a death ruled suicide. Many different theories on this case! Readers are encouraged to read our report in Strange Deaths. Jon Parnell Walker: An investigator for the RTC who was looking into the linkage between the Whitewater and Madison S&L bankruptcy. Walker “fell” from the top of the Lincoln Towers Building. Stanley Heard & Steven Dickson: They were members of the Clinton health care advisory committee. They died in a plane crash on September 10, 1993. Jerry Luther Parks: Parks was the Chief of Security for Clinton’s national campaign headquarters in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car on September 26, 1993 near the intersection of Chenal Parkway and Highway 10 west of Little Rock. Parks was shot through the rear window of his car. The assailant then pulled around to the driver’s side of Park’s car and shot him three more times with a 9mm pistol. His family reported that shortly before his death, they were being followed by unknown persons, and their home had been broken into (despite a top quality alarm system). Parks had been compiling a dossier on Clinton’s illicit activities. The dossier was stolen. Ed Willey: A Clinton fundraiser. He died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound on November 30, 1993. His death came the same day his wife, Kathleen, was sexually assaulted in the White House by Bill Clinton. Gandy Baugh: Baugh was Lasater’s attorney and committed suicide on January 8, 1994. Baugh’s partner committed suicide exactly one month later on February 8, 1994. Herschell Friday: A member of the presidential campaign finance committee. He died in an airplane explosion on March 1, 1994. Ronald Rogers: Rogers died on March 3, 1994 just prior to releasing sensitive information to a London newspaper. Cause of death? Undetermined. Kathy Furguson: A 38 year old hospital worker whose ex-husband is a co- defendant in the Paula Jones sexual harassment law suit. She had information supporting Paula Jone’s allegations. She died of an apparent suicide on May 11, 1994 from a gunshot wound to the head. Bill Shelton: Shelton was an Arkansas police officer and was found dead as an apparent suicide on kathy Ferguson’s grave (Kathy was his girl friend), on June 12, 1994. This “suicide” was the result of a gunshot wound to the back of the head. Stanley Huggins: Huggins, 46, was a principal in a Memphis law firm which headed a 1987 investigation into the loan practices of Madison Guaranty S&L. Stanley died in Delaware in July 1994 — reported cause of death was viral pneumonia. Paul Olson: A Federal witness in investigations to drug money corruption in Chicago politics, Paul had just finished 2 days of FBI interviews when his plane ride home crashed, killing Paul and 130 others on Sept 8 1994. The Sept. 15, 1994 Tempe Tribune newspaper reported that the FBI suspected that a bomb had brought down the airplane. Calvin Walraven: 24 year on Walraven was a key witness against Jocelyn Elder’s son’s drug case. Walraven was found dead in his apartment with a gunshot wound to the head. Tim Hover, a Little Rock police spokesman says no foul play is suspected. Alan G. Whicher: Oversaw Clinton’s Secret Service detail. In October 1994 Whicher was transferred to the Secret Service field office in the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. Whatever warning was given to the BATF agents in that building did not reach Alan Whicher, who died in the bomb blast of April 19th 1995. Duane Garrett: Died July 26, 1995-A lawyer and a talk show host for KGO-AM in San Fransisco, Duane was the campaign finance chairman for Diane Fienstien’s run for the senate, and was a friend and fundraiser for Al Gore. Garrett was under investigation for defrauding investors in Garrett’s failed sports memorabilia venture. There was talk of a deal to evade prosecution. On July 26th, Garrett canceled an afternoon meeting with his lawyer because he had to meet some people at the San Fransisco airport. Three hours later he was found floating in the bay under the Golden Gate Bridge. Ron Brown:. The Commerce Secretary died on April 3, 1996, in an Air Force jet carrying Brown and 34 others, including 14 business executives on a trade mission to Croatia, crashed into a mountainside. The Air Force, in a 22-volume report issued in June of 1996, confirmed its initial judgment that the crash resulted from pilot errors and faulty navigation equipment. At the time of Brown’s death, Independent Counsel Daniel Pearson was seeking to determine whether Brown had engaged in several sham financial transactions with longtime business partner Nolanda Hill shortly before he became secretary of commerce. Charles Meissner: died: UNK - Following Ron Brown’s death, John Huang was placed on a Commerce Department contract that allowed him to retain his security clearanceby Charles Meissner. Shortly thereafter, Meissner died in the crash of a small plane. He was an Assistant Secretary of Commerce for International Economic Policy. William Colby: Retired CIA director was found dead on May 6,1996 after his wife reported him missing on April 27,1996. Apparently, Colby decided to go on a impromptu canoeing excursion and never returned. Colby who had just started writing for Strategic Investment newsletter, worried many in the intelligent community. Colby’s past history of divulging CIA secrets in the past were well known. Strategic Investor had covered the Vince Foster suicide and had hired handwriting experts to review Foster’s suicide note. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: Died on May 16,1996 after he went home for lunch and decided to shoot himself in the chest (by one report, twice) rather than be interviewed by Newsweek magazine that afternoon. Explanations for Boorda’s suicide focused on a claim that he was embarrassed over two “Valor” pins he was not authorized to wear. Lance Herndon: Herndon a 41 year old computer specialist and a prominent entrepreneur who received a presidential appointment in 1995 died August 10, 1996 under suspicious circumstances. He appeared to have died from a blow to the head. Police said no weapons were found at his mansion, adding that Mr. Herndon had not been shot or stabbed and there was no evidence of forced entry or theft. Neil Moody: Died -August 25, 1996 Following Vincent Foster’s murder, Lisa Foster married James Moody, a judge in Arkansas, on Jan 1, 1996. Near the time Susan McDougal first went to jail for contempt, Judge Moor’s son, Neil died in a car crash. There were other reports that Neil Moody had discovered something very unsettling among his stepmother’s private papers and was threatening to go public with it just prior to the beginning of the Democratic National Convention. He was alleged to have been talking to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post about a blockbuster story. Witnesses said they saw Neil Moody sitting in his car arguing with another person just prior to His car suddenly speeding off out of control and hitting a brick wall. Barbara Wise: Wise a 14-year Commerce Department employee found dead and partially naked in her office following a long weekend. She worked in the same section as John Huang. Officially, she is said to have died of natural causes. Doug Adams: Died January 7, 1997- A lawyer in Arkansas who got involved trying to help the people who were being swindled out of their life savings. Adams was found in his vehicle with a gunshot wound to his head in a Springfield Mo. hospital parking lot. Mary C. Mahoney: 25, murdered at the Georgetown Starbuck’s coffee bar over the 4th of July ‘97 weekend. She was a former White House intern who worked with John Huang. Apparently she knew Monica Lewinsky and her sexual encounters with Bill Clinton. Although not verified, it has been said that Lewinsky told Linda Tripp that she did not want to end up like Mahoney. Ronald Miller: Suddenly took ill on October 3rd,1997 and steadily worsened until his death 9 days later. (This pattern fits Ricin poisoning.) Owing to the strangeness of the illness, doctors at the Integris Baptist Medical Center referred the matter to the Oklahoma State Medical Examiner’s Office. The Oklahoma State Medical Examiner’s Office promptly ran tests on samples of Ron Miller’s blood, but has refused to release the results or even to confirm that the tests were ever completed. Had been investigated by authorities over the sale of his company, Gage Corp. to Dynamic Energy Resources, Inc. was the man who tape recorded Gene and Nora Lum and turned those tapes (and other records) over to congressional oversight investigators. The Lums were sentenced to prison for campaign finance violations, using “straw donors” to conceal the size of their contributions to various candidates. Indeed, Dynamic Energy Resources, Inc. had hired Ron Brown’s son Michael solely for the purpose of funneling $60,000 through him to the Commerce Secretary, according to Nolanda Hill’s testimony. Sandy Hume: On Sunday, February 22nd, 1998, Sandy Hume, the 28 year old son of journalist Britt Hume, was reportedly found dead in his Arlington, Virginia home. Aside from the statement that this was an “apparent” suicide, there remains in place a total media blackout on this story, possibly out of concern that the actual facts will not withstand public scrutiny. Worked for Hill magazine, about Congress for Congress. Jim McDougal: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend, banker, and political ally, sent to prison for eighteen felony convictions. A key whitewater witness, dies of a heart attack on March, 8 1998. As of this writing allegations that he was given an injection of the diuretic lasix has not been denied or confirmed.Died on March 8, 1998 Johnny Lawhon: 29, died March 29, 1998- The Arkansas transmission specialist who discovered a pile of Whitewater documents in the trunk of an abandoned car on his property and turned them over to Starr, was killed in a car wreck two weeks after the McDougal death.. Details of the “accident” have been sketchy — even from the local Little Rock newspaper. Charles Wilbourne Miller: 63, was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head on November 17, 1998 in a shallow pit about 300 yards from his ranch house near Little Rock. Police found a .410 gauge shotgun near Miller’s body and a Ruger .357-caliber revolver submerged in water. Investigators concluded the Ruger was the weapon used by Miller to kill himself. Yet, two rounds in the handgun’s cylinder had been spent. He had long served as executive vice president and member of the board of directors for a company called Alltel and was deeply involved in his own software engineering company until the day he died. Alltel is the successor to Jackson Stephens’ Systematics, the company that provided the software for the White House’s “Big Brother” data base system and that was behind the administration’s plan to develop the secret computer “Clipper” chip to bug every phone, fax and email transmission in America. Carlos Ghigliotti: 42, was found dead in his home just outside of Washington D.C. on April 28, 2000. There was no sign of a break-in or struggle at the firm of Infrared Technology where the badly decomposed body of Ghigliotti was found. Ghigliotti had not been seen for several weeks. Ghigliotti, a thermal imaging analyst hired by the House Government Reform Committee to review tape of the siege, said he determined the FBI fired shots on April 19, 1993. The FBI has explained the light bursts on infrared footage as reflections of sun rays on shards of glass or other debris that littered the scene. “I conclude this based on the groundview videotapes taken from several different angles simultaneously and based on the overhead thermal tape,” Ghigliotti told The Washington Post last October. “The gunfire from the ground is there, without a doubt.” Ghigliotti said the tapes also confirm the Davidians fired repeatedly at FBI agents during the assault, which ended when flames raced through the compound. About 80 Branch Davidians perished that day, some from the fire, others from gunshot wounds. Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the congressional committee chaired by Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., said that police found the business card of a committee investigator in Ghigliotti’s office. Corallo said Ghigliotti’s work for the committee ended some time ago. Tony Moser: 41, was killed as he crossed a street in Pine Bluff, Ark on on June 10, 2000. Killed 10 days after being named a columnist for the Democrat-Gazette newspaper and two days after penning a stinging indictment of political corruption in Little Rock. Police have concluded that no charges will be filed against the unnamed driver of a 1995 Chevrolet pickup, which hit Moser as he was walking alone in the middle of unlit Rhinehart Road about 10:10 p.m Police say they have ruled out foul play and will file no charges against the driver because he was not intoxicated and there was no sign of excessive speed.

Friday, February 08, 2008

$5 MILLION FOR ADNAN EL SHUKRIJUMAH

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ EXCELLENT ARTICLE just posted REWARD & TERRORISM BACKGROUND DETAILS click here ALSO CHECK OUT VARIOUS POSTS AND VIDEOS, INCLUDING A FARSI "LEGACY OF KHOMEINI" VIDEO ON MULTILINGUAL. New posts going up on the various Pages frequently, so browse the other AntiMullah web pages, (links to each in the left hand column) including "graphics" and "videos". Terror News now carrying longer articles on Terror related subjects instead of only news briefs or headings.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

GIFTS FOR SOLDIERS AT WALTER REED HOSPITAL

The following is a list of items that would be a wonderful gift for soldiers who are in Walter Reed Hospital in Washing, D.C. Mologne House at Walter Reed Semper Gratus P.O. Box 168 Poolesville, MD 20837 . Here is a list of suggested items: PERSONAL ITEMS:[Note: all personal care items must be factory-packed and unbroken]Good-quality disposable razors“Hotel style” size bottles of shampoo, conditioner, etdcShaving creamElectric razorsToothbrush, toothpasteDeodorantSkin lotion suitable for men as well as womenSmall containers/packs of liquid laundry detergent and softener sheetsNo cigarettes or other tobacco products, please GIFT CARDS:Pre-paid Phone cards (International cards preferred so they can call back to their unit in Iraq)Prepaid Store Credit cards (BP & Sunoco gasoline, KFC, McDonald’s, CVS pharmacy, Giant & Safeway groceries are nearby)[NOTE: Please do not seal up envelopes with prepaid cards. We give them to the staff, who distribute them to the troops who need them most. Freepmail me to let me know they are coming.] CLOTHINGBreak-away trousers (snaps or zips along legs to accomodate braces)Caps (knitted for winter or baseball caps — especially NFL logos, various teams)Coats & Jackets (cold weather; Large to 3X)Flannel pajamas (adaptive if possible)GlovesMuffler scarvesShoes, athletic (sizes 9-12)SocksSweatshirts / jackets (zipped & hooded, from Large to 3X)Sweatpants (sizes 32 to 46)T-shirts, plain or with graphics (sports teams popular)Underwear (32 to 46; briefs, boxers, undershirts with sleeves or without)Weight-lifting Gloves (for wheelchair patients) FOOD ITEMSBulk items of the sort you buy at Costco is a great way to goCandyCandy bars (Baby Ruth, Snickers, 3 Musketeers, Milky Ways)Cookies, individual cakes (LIttle Debbies, Tastykakes, Rice Krispie Treats etc)Beef jerky, individually wrappedHealth or energy barsGumCrackers (peanut butter or cheese-filled)Chips, pretzels (individual bags)Bottled spring water FOR THE CHILDREN (as soldier’s families often stay at Mologne House, there is a great need for children items)Children’s books and moviesSmall toysDolls and other stuffed animalsColoring books and crayonsArts and crafts for kids OTHER DVDsBooksCurrent magazinesPlaying cardsPuzzles and Games Take care and have a great day!

IRAN LAUNCH IN THE NAME OF THE 12TH IMAM

video

Launch announcer, after invoking Allah, dedicates it to the 12th Imam, the boy who disappeared into the Jamkaran well 1,400 years ago and who the Hojatieh, Ahmadi-Nejad (aka the Turd) wants to have back to destroy civilization and replace it with global Islam.

Announcer counts down: 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 - NOTHING!

Starts counting up: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7--8 unexpected Blast Off!

REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE FANATICISM WILL HURT THEIR CHANCES

Some food for thought, which may not make me popular but might serve to focus on the attitude which cuts noses to spite faces. I am NOT, repeat NOT a McCain supporter but to refuse to vote for a REPUBLICAN of any shade and thus help get Hitlery or is it Billery into the White House is a mindboggling mind set. Fanatically similar, except for the subject matter with that of a Jihadist’s determination to get their point of view and control over us - even by killing us. Or killing themselves!! What’s the difference in getting Hitlery and her Al Qaeda girl Friday Huma Abedin into the White House (by not voting or voting against McCain on face spiting, nose cutting, conservative “principles”) and the unthinking Jihadi imposing his outdated. Dark Age, religious mind set on us? Republicans lost the Congress and Senate last time round because so many decided not to vote because they were disgruntled!!! This includes some of my closer friends. Or by NOT voting for a REPUBLICAN, even someone like McCain, a RINO (Republican In Name Only) in many aspects, to perhaps help Obama as a result, a Moslem till age 16, to control our fate vis-a-vis Iran and the Islamic world and terrorism. Good enough human being but totally unsuited to deal with Islam or terrorism, specially since his alleged change to Christianity makes him an apostate and subject to the death penalty in any Islamic society. Are we also so fanatical in our conservative “ideals” that we are ready to scuttle the ship or burn the barn to get at/hurt McCain? It’s our ship, our barn, our survival, even in a less than pefect format. Are we so hard headed that we are ready to shoot ourselves in the foot to make a point? A point that will make our lives MUCH worse than McCain, or any RINO - except pehaps Ron Paul - could or would ever do - COMPARED to any of the Democrats! My focus is purely on the safety of our nation not political details. Do we not realize that our fissy huff only serves to help the “opposition DimRats”? We sound like those Christians who refuse to accept medical help in the name of their religion and watch their children, wives, husbands or parents DIE because they believe so strongly in God that they will not help save them! I respect their strength of belief but cannot recommend we all adopt it as our way of life. Not if we want our families to have good healthy life. So why do conservative Republicans try to insist on the same thing. Except, again, in the context? Where is that different to the fanaticism of the Islamic Jihadists? Other than in context? Where is refusing to vote Republican and retain the White House, even with a RINO, WORSE than having Billery or Obama take it over??? For God’s sake people, please don’t do with the election what the West is doing with Islam - ignoring the alternative of what we face by appeasing INNER desires and PROUDLY and senselessly losing the war. Until McCain became the apparent candidate for Republicans, this debate and stance causes no great harm. But NOW is the time to rally around the designated Republican - RINO or otherwise and fight the DimRats instead of continuing to splinter the Republican party, on which the SAFETY of our NATION depends. Certainly compared to the even BEST the DimRats have to offer. Wake up Republicans! Don't burn the country to make a point.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

ISLAMIST ON DEMOCRAT NATIONAL COMMITTEE

Islamist on the DNC's Convention Committee February 4, 2008 'The executive committee of the Democratic National Committee has elected three Indian Americans to the standing committees at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, convening Aug. 25-28 in Denver, Colo.'(as in Far East dot, not feather' Indians) The focus is on this one in particular: Iman Malik Mujahid (aka Abdul Malik Mujahid), founder and president of the Chicago-based Sound Vision Foundation. It should come as no surprise since Islamists have infiltrated the Pentagon. Alan note: Remember Hillary Clinton's Girl Friday and constant companion, Huma Abedin, who lives on funds with unclear sources, whose family has strong ties to Al Qaeda and would continue to have access if the Clintons get into the White House again! It proves that no matter what side of the aisle you’re on, they’re trying to get in. Robert Spencer: Malik Mujahid, who, according to Miss Kelly, 'published a book, Commanders of the Muslim Army, about historical Muslim military leaders ‘who loved death more than life’ and who ‘led the armies of Islam against the Kuffars and nonbelievers.’' She has more, too, as does LGF. Miss Kelly points out that 'Mujahid', is Arabic for 'one who makes jihad' or 'one who fights in a war for Islam.' Given that Howard Dean spoke at the September 2007 Islamic Society of North America convention (the ISNA is one of several Muslim Brotherhood-front organizations in the US), the DNC clearly does want Islamists actively involved with the Democratic party. This is just another example of what’s going on with the dems as far as Islam is concerned - outside of Barack Hussein Obama and his connection to genocide, compliments of his sharia-supporting cousin of his, Raila Odinga in Kenya. What was particularly interesting was that Malik Mujahid (aka Abdul Malik Mujahid) is the founder and president of the Chicago-based Sound Vision Foundation. Ms. Kelly quotes this from Militant Islam Monitor: 'Sound Vision, an affiliate of the the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview Illinois. Bridgeview isn’t very far from me. Which is concerning to me. What’s even more concerning is The Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago lists its members…and they’re all from sleepy suburbs around me including Naperville and Villa Park. But what’s absolutely terrifying is this: The [Bridgeview] Mosque Foundation has been under law enforcement scrutiny for more then a decade for ties to terrorism and several of their congregants have been arrested. The most recent arrest of a Mosque Foundation member was Mohammed Saleh, who was charged with involvement in funding and recruiting terrorist operatives in Gaza.'(August, 2004) Bridgeview Mosque Foundation/ Hamas member Mohamed Saleh arrested with Howard U prof Abdelhaleem Ashqar on terrorism charges. '…. (Yusuf) Islam’s (formerly Cat Stevens) close friend Abdul Malik Muhajid, the director of Sound Vision, is listed as the National Coordinator for the Bosnia Task Force and Kosova Task Force. The Bosnia Task Force is alleged to have direct ties to Al Qaeda and the Benevolence International Foundation, an Al Qaeda funding front whose founder Ernaam Arnaout, is now jailed on terror funding charges.' What a nice way to respond to 9/11. Bio info on Abdul Malik Mujahid shows that he was the national president of the Islamic Circle of North America, an organisation which has been directly linked to Al Qaeda. Call people who are concerned about terrorists ‘conspiracy theorists’ and completely give into them; that’s no strategy. That white flag of Harry Reid’s is their response to just about everything including domestic threats.

IRAN'S FEARFUL "TURD" BUYS DOGS!

Ahmadi-Nejad (Initials "an" = "turd" in Persian) has just paid about $162,000 EACH for FOUR (total) German Guard Dogs!!!!! Moslems consider dogs unclean and will not touch them so this purchase, AT THIS PRICE, is incredible! Under this regime, Iranians can be arrested for walkIng their dogs or carrying a cat in public. They are not allowed to bring them to public parks. The ruling ostensibly protects Moslems from being polluted by the dogs and carrying a cat (specially by males) is considered a "gay" issue and to be discouraged. To bring this into focus, when Reza Shah Pahlavi (Kabir) the late Shah's father came to the throne, non-Moslems (specially Jews) were not allowed to leave their homes if it were RAINING, as it might splash off them or run off their shoes and POLLUTE a true Moslem who might be passing or later using the same sidewalk or street! These four dogs show how terrified the "Turd" President of Iran is of suicide bombers, that he is willing to CONTAMINATE, make UNLCEAN his visitors by subjecting them to being smelled by what is certainly bomb sniffing canines. The Mullahs claim that because these dogs were reared and trained in Iran, they are NOT "unclean" as long as they are used as guard dogs! So much for following the Koran, exept when killing people.

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

THE RICHNESS OF PERSIA, THE MISERY OF ISLAMIC IRAN

THE MULLAHS REJECT AND DENY ANYTHING BEFORE AND AFTER THE KORAN. ALL KNOWLEDGE IS CONTAINED IN THE KORAN!!! tEACHING ANYTHING ELSE IS BLASPHEMY. AHMADI -NEJAD, THE "TURD" ('an', his family name initials mean 'turd' in Persian) and his Islamic cohorts are going to flood and derstroy the tomb of Cyrus the Great who gave this world the first "Human Rights".

Check out an article below named "Ruthless Prison" to compare.

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST US CITIZENS - IN THE USA !!!

Letter by a Florida teacher................ A teacher speaks This is a subject close to my heart. Do you know that we have adult students at the school where I teach who are not US citizens and who get the PELL grant, which is a federal grant (no pay back required) plus other federal grants to go to school? One student from the Dominican Republic told me that she didn't want me to find a job for her after she finished my program, because she was getting housing from our housing department and she was getting a PELL grant which paid for her total tuition and books, plus money leftover. She was looking into WAIT which gives students a CREDIT CARD for gas to come to school, and into CARIBE which is a special program (check it out - I did) for immigrants and it pays for child care and all sorts of needs while they go to school or training. The one student I just mentioned told me she was not going to be a US Citizen because she plans to return to the Dominican Republic someday and that she "loves HER country." I asked her if she felt guilty taking what the US is giving her and then not even bothering to become a citizen and she told me that it doesn't bother her, because that is what the money is there for! I asked the CARIBE administration about their program and if you ARE a US Citizen, you don't qualify for their program. And all the while, I am working a full day, my son-in-law works more than 60 hours a week, and everyone in my family works and pays for our education. Something is wrong here. I am sorry but after hearing they want to sing the National Anthem in Spanish - enough is enough. Nowhere did they sing it in Italian, Polish, Irish (Celtic), German or any other language because of immigration. It was written by Francis Scott Key and should be sung word for word the way it was written. The news broadcasts even gave the translation -- not even close. Sorry if this offends anyone but this is MY COUNTRY. IF IT IS YOUR COUNTRY SPEAK UP -- please pass this along. I am not against immigration -- just come through like everyone else. Get a sponsor; have a place to lay your head; have a job; pay your taxes, live by the rules AND LEARN THE LANGUAGE as all other immigrants have in the past -- and GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Sunday, February 03, 2008

WORLD'S LARGEST RUTHLESS PRISON - ISLAMIC IRAN

Iran a Prison The video below, in Persian (Farsi), needs to be watched by everyone! It is this kind of unwanted publicity here for the Mullahs that has caused them to FORBID public executions, as per spokesman Ali Jamshidi, without permission of the "Mullah of Justice", Mahmoud Shahroudi, wrongly called Minister of Justice, as would be the appellation in a civilized society, not one running on and imposing mindsets, customs and Dark Ages rules from 1,400 years ago. However, Shahroudi has recently been coming out against Ahmadi-Nejad's bloodlust. And his spokesman has added that executions should not impact the psyche of the population negatively, specially the youth. Contradicting the "instill abject fear" of the presidential "turd". (If you take the Iranian president's last name initials "A-N" it corresponds to "an" the Persian word for "turd"!) I watched a public execution once, decades ago, of the kind used in Islamic Iran, where the hanging is not a drop and neck snap but a "string 'em up" or drop off a table or off a tail gate "choke and strangle to death". What has been visually missing is the death struggle, the knees rising to the chest in agony, the legs kicking around, linked together by ankle chains though they may be. And what is not seen in any of the videos, the sudden emptying of the bowels, the sperm ejaculation and the release of bladder fluids. The video below has a three person hanging section where the middle person (in black outfit) does exactly all that. The knees up in agony and the protracted length of time of the choking strangling body in agony till death clearly portrayed. Clearly nobody paid a bribe for him. The ones that appear to go quietly are those who have been heavily drugged after bribes are paid to the executioners to ease the end or to hang their weight onto the legs as they drop and finish it off more quickly. (Note the one with a very elongated neck almost certainly caused by this "hanging on"). The other reason for apparently smooth deaths is that the struggles are not filmed by those who take the stills or videos because they are horrified at attending the gruesome hangings. Unlike stonings to death, where everyone participates to get their share of points for a path to paradise, watching the hanged body contort and struggle, earns no such points and most of the Iranian populace is drawn toward hangings but find themselves sickened by what they see. Also why at the beginning of the revolution in 1979, Iranians refused to man firing squads and execute fellow countryment. Khomeini had to use the 2,000 or so Palestinians who came to Iran with Arafart, to beg for money, to do the job. They initially forced the Khomeini prison guards to watch then gradually threatened them with being shot if they did not help execute. After a few kills, and under threat of being shot themselves, the Iranians succumbed and then became inured. Apart from graphic visuals, the sheer number of hangings shown in this short video speaks volumes. In January 2008, the Mullahs hanged some 24 men and women in the first 20-days and have not stopped since. About one hanging a day! Ignoring international protests. Another seven were executed in the past week keeping up the one a day rythm of OFFICIALLY REPORTED executions. Many, many more happen in the provinces and remote areas without any trace in the press or Mullah Justice announcements.

In Sanandaj, a provincial Kurdish town, a student was arrested and died shortly afterwards under torture. TO PREVENT AN AUTOPSY, the body was returned for burial to the family ENCASED INSIDE A CONCRETE BLOCK! Any injury marks on the body could be claimed on the effort to extract it from the thick concrete.

A PREVIOUS SANANDAJ STUDENT'S BODY REMAINS AFTER ARREST, TORTURE AND DEATH EXPLAINS THE CONCRETE BLOCKBefore TortureAfter 2 After 1 After 4 Look for three minority Bahais, working with children, to be executed soon. They posted bond after their first arrest but were recently rearrested for endangering national security and disruptive activity. The charges stem from the fact they taught the kids under their care the principles of their Bahai religion. This video is also going up on the Multilingual page which the Mullahs and their people appear to visit frequently.

Friday, February 01, 2008

SEX WITH DAUGHTERS-IN-LAW ORDAINED BY ALLAH

The following article is from a web site run by ex-Muslims, http://www.islamwatch.org/ . While it is quite obviously a satire, the references given are all right out of the Qur'an. (you can look them up). You can see how Islam's doctrines and Islamic law (sharia) were derived from the revelations of Muhammed which were compiled into the Qur'an (Koran). The Midinans were the followers of Muhammed who accompanied him to Medina, after he and his followers fled from Mecca because of persecution there. The incident of Muhammed taking his daughter-in-law is based upon accepted historical fact. The author is most probably the pen name of an ex-Muslim Sex With Daughters-in-Law: Divinely Ordained in Islam by Ayesha Ahmed Sex with daughters in law is a very pious and sacred relationship which is promoted by Quran and was practiced by 'insan kamil,'” our prophet, the perfect man. Our prophet had a beautiful daughter in law Zainab, wife of his ADOPTED SON known as Zaid Bin Mohammed. One morning he walked into her room looking for his son and ran into her while she was just waking up and was wearing revealing clothing. He liked what he saw. To make a long story short , she was in his bed within a few days. MADINANS CONFRONT THE PROPHET In Arab culture a daughter in law was like one's own daughter, irrespective of whether the son was biological or adopted. The news that the prophet violated his own beloved son’s wife enraged Madinans. They confronted him. Madinans: “Oh Prophet of Allah , how could you , of all the people an apostle of God, carry out a disgusting and despicable act of sleeping with your own daughter in Law. Your harem is bursting at seams with young and beautiful wives . On top of that you regularly take 20% cut from the crop of infidel captured women as your share of booty . Rasulullah, your act is an incest which puts the time honored noble arab tradition of “adoption” to shame”.. Prophet: “To me the only noble and honorable act is to follow Allah’s orders . And Allah was the one who ordered me to acquire Zainab. Here is the aya”: 33.37 “We gave her ( Zaid’s wife ) in marriage to thee, so that there should not be any fault in the believers, touching wives of their adopted sons”. Madinans: "It sounds very strange that Allah is so enthusiastic to get us married to our adopted children. Anyways , if that is what Allah wants so be it. But howcum you never had a marriage ceremony with Zainab before taking her to bed? Wouldn’t that still be called an adultery?” Prophet: “Not at all , because I am allowed to have sex with my first cousins without marriage and Zainab is the daughter of my aunt. Here is the aya:” 33.50 (continued): O Prophet, We have made lawful for thee the daughters of thy uncles paternal and aunts paternal, thy uncles maternal and aunts maternal, who have emigrated with thee. Madinans: "Prophet , are you sure that aya 33.50 was not brought to you by Satan like he brought to you the 'satanic ayas' in Mecca?" Prophet: “I don’t get tricked by Satan any more. I am dead sure that Jibraeel brought it to me”.. Madinans: “Rasulullah ,there is another matter which we like to discuss with you. We are told that you have been sleeping with our wives after you send us on Jihad to far off places . Is that true”. Prophet: “ Yes it is. Believing women offer themselves to me in the hope of salvation and special favours from Allah in the hereafter and Allah has allowed me to fulfill their requests by aya 33.50 and also allowed is any woman believer, if she gives herself to the Prophet and if the Prophet desires her (to have sex) (the word is nikah which means penetrating some one). " However, as you know I am a very busy man and cannot fulfill all requests. Besides my wives get very antsy and jealous when I am with them ; they also hate to see the long lines of muslimas outside my room daily". Madinans: “Actually your wives are the ones who informed us of this matter. They said that you get so drained and tired by the time you come to their rooms, you fall asleep right after prayers. Some of your younger wives looked so jealous and outraged that we could have easily taken advantage of them like Safwan Bin Muattal is rumoured to have done with resentful and angry Ayesha on the way back from Mustaleeq after you dumped her for Juvaria.. You yourself believed she did it and had sent her to her Dad's house. Prophet: “Allah is aware of all that. That is why he has ordered my wives to be segregated and veiled from now on. You are not allowed to come to my home without permission any more and are only allowed to talk to them from behind a curtain , if you must (prior to that madina men socialized with them freely without hijab). Here is the revelation”: 33.53: “O you who believe! do not enter the house of the Prophet unless permission is given. And when ye ask of them (the wives of the Prophet) anything, ask it of them from behind a curtain”. And Allah has also given stern warning to my misbehaving wives." 33.30 : "O wives of the prophet! Who ever of you commits an open indecency, the punishment shall be increased to her doubly". Madinans: “Can we at least marry them when you are dead and gone because poor girls look so young and unfulfilled while you are old and ready to kick the bucket”. Prophet: "No way. Nobody should touch them even after I am gone". Madinans: “But you have married young widows of jihadis killed in the raids you ordered, Why cant we marry your widows then” Prophet: “Because Allah said so”. 33.53 (contd). “And ye must not marry his wives, after him, for ever. This would be a grave offence to God”. Madinans: “Forget about your wives . What about one night stands with our cousins and other muslimas if they offer themselves to us?”.. Prophet : “No one night stands for you. .You can sleep with them only if you marry them “... Madinans. “Why not?. You do it ”.. Prophet: “Because one night stands is a privilege only for me , not for any one else. Here is the continuation of aya 33.50”. 33.50 (continued)” That is a special privilege for thee, not for other believers. They are only allowed their married wives and their right hands possessions (slave girls and captured women)” Madinans: “But Prophet of Allah, does not aya 33.21 says you are our role model and aya 3.31 says we are to follow your example if we loved Allah? Then those ayas are really B.S.;because when you indulge in incest and adultery Allah endorses it right away and when we want to follow you and do the same , Allah calls it adultery and calls for flogging and stoning. Why?” Prophet: “Allah said not to irritate your prophet and you are irritating the hell out of me”. 33.53 (continued): “It is not right for you to annoy and irritate the prophet of God.” Madinans: “Cant we even ask any questions?” Prophet: “No. If you ask questions you will end up getting beheaded.” Madinans: “Where does that say in Quran?” Prophet: “Sure it does. Ayas 5.101/102 says: 5.101/102 “Don’t ask questions. You lose faith by asking questions". "When you lose faith you become apostate and Allah calls for beheading of renegades even before infidels”.. Moral of the above fill in the blanks Quranic story: Your brain is like your donkey , and Islam is like a mosque. You can ride your donkey any where you want, but when you enter the mosque you have to leave the donkey at the gate.