For a few days there was a growing almost feeding frenzy of visits, mostly from Google search queries, that suddenly disappeared as if a water faucet had been turned off.
Out of curiosity, I did a search - just as others had - of "Huma Abedin" - and disovered the main link that drew in so may visitors had disappeared. Antimullah or the noiri.blog no longer figured in the Google search.
There are hundreds of articles on Huma posted all over on the internet, so the ABRUPT absence of this particular one screams volumes.
As you can see, the AntiMullah article date March 2008 is gone but older articles from other sites as there.
Someone behind the scenes at Google had apparently "pulled it" so that instead of being at near the top or at the top of the search as before, you could not find either of the article links. No matter how far you drilled.
While this may seem an end in itself, the multitude of visitors also got to see the seven other Sections of AntiMullah and articles that covered terrorism and brought attention to subjects disliked by the Mullahs. (In addition to perhaps "outing" or shining the spotlight on probably the highest Al-Qaeda plant in the USA).
Not too long ago, that same "unseen" behind the scene "apparently" pro-Iranian Mullah influence, most likely in the Google tech section, temporarily made posting to AntiMullah very difficult.
It took a few days to have the situation corrected but here again, the unseen person, who might, just might be a Mullah plant inside Google, has struck again.
The Mullahs have their people inside as many Media and Blog administrations as they can and pay excellent money to TV, Radio and Print Media for obstructing dissent to them and for planting false information.
The link below was the one which brought most of the visitors that is now "absent" but the link at the title also brings this up as a link within that post, so just click on th title to get the full details.
Clearly the way to check it is to do a Google search on "Huma Abedin" and see what you get. It will NOT include the one below.
Yet another reason for Google to check their staff and correct the situation.