Wednesday, September 16, 2009

BASIS FOR ORLY'S CLAIM FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff(s), v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET. AL.,
Defendant(s),

CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET. AL.,

CASE NO. SA CV09-0082-DOC(ANx)

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR OCTOBER 5, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.

-snip-

"...Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party

the Court would order that any or all discovery is

premature, the Court encourages the parties to begin


discovery before the Scheduling Conference. The parties

shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a)

and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be

produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the

Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines

to complete discovery. RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE OF PARTIES

Counsel shall confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(f). This conference shall occur at least

twenty-one (21) days before the Scheduling Conference set

by the Court. RULE 26(f) REPORT The parties shall file

their Rule 26(f) report with the Court no later than

fourteen (14) days prior to the Scheduling Conference set

by the Court. The report shall contain the following: (1)

(2) (3) a short factual summary of the case and of claims

and defenses.

No comments: