Wednesday, April 21, 2010

(UPDATED COMMENTS) ARIZONA WANTS TO KNOW - IS OBAMA ILLEGALLY IN THE WHITE HOUSE ?


ARROGANTLY RUDE TO CANADIAN LEADER HARPER

EVEN MORE SO WITH ISRAEL'S NETANYAHU


OBSEQUIOUS WITH THE CHINESE LEADER  
(NOTE THE SHADOW - HIS BOW AND RAMROD STRAIGHT STANCE OF THE CHINAMAN IN RETURN)



As Oba-Hussein messes up the USA financially and morally, as he messes up our foreign policy, as he bows deferentially to other Heads of State, as he IMPOSES his Marxist-Islamic concepts on us against the will of the plurality fo the people, in contravention of our Constitution, which he shreds with disdain, as he disrespects our allies and supports our enemies, his eligibity rises closer and closer to the top of many American minds as an escape from this Chicago style thug and his equally thuggish Senate and Congressional leaders, who trample on "we the people" in a flagrant  abuse of power.

HIs choice of "czars" with whom he surrounds himself and "rules" speaks volumes about who he is and how he thinks.

Passing major legislation by brute force without having even read it, says it all about all of them!

20 STATES HAVE ALREADY FILED SUIT AGAINST THIS DESTRUCTIVE SHAM BY DEMOCRATS

How 'bout that Arizona legislature? Demonstrating that the best political myths have half lives that rival some radioactive isotopes, the state House of Representatives advanced legislation that would require future presidential candidates -- say, Barack Obama in 2012 -- to prove that they are citizens before their names can appear on the state's ballot.

The proposal, which must still be considered by the state Senate, would require national political parties to submit "documents that prove that the candidate is a natural-born citizen, prove the candidate's age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for president of the United States as prescribed in Article II, Section 1, Constitution of the United States."

It goes on to give the Arizona secretary of state the discretion to keep a candidate's name off the ballot if he or she has "reasonable cause" to believe the candidate doesn't meet those requirements.

2 comments:

d said...

Good video but the part about the address seems to be over the top. It seems to me that the birth announcement is legit. The Grandparents lived in Hawaii and had it included in the paper when their daughter gave birth. Is there any indication that this is an automatic announcement done by the hospital or is it one placed by the family?

Alan Peters said...

Just as Hawaii used to issue CERTIFICATION (not certificate) of Live birth to people NOT actually born in the island but ALLEGEDLY living in Hawaii during the first two years of their life and a FORGED copy of even this was fraudulently used to defend the validity of the claim to being born in the USA based on a SINGLE parent declaration.

The declaration to the media/press would also be from the parent, who had access to influence this in a very laid back Hawaii Islands.

The neighbors of the address used to register the birth have no recollection of having anyone coming close to the description of the mother, black baby nor the grandparents living next to nor even near to them.

While not providing a copy of the true copy of the long form, the Hawaii authorities DID provide an alphabetical list of names of those born in Hawaii during the years that would cover Obama's claimed birth.

NO NAME EXISTS that matches his names nor ANY VARIATIONS of Obama, Soetero, the grandparents' names nor his mother's maiden name in the database!!!

A copy of the lists was posted on AntiMullah for easy reference (do a search).

And as for the scoffers who try to state that the mother, grandparents nor anyone else could have guessed that Obama would one day become president and THUS try to invalidate/Discredit the questioning of legitimacy OVERLOOK the real motive of the falsification by mother and grandparents.

They were NOT thinking of "natural born" for a presidency but to try to have a foreign born child be an American citizen of ANY kind according to their own nationalities and to have this go around the usual immigration procedures.

The greatest mistake the scoffers make is not WHERE he was born which is almost irrelevant for a child born of a FOREIGN national father (Kenyan/British) who thus automatically fails to qualify as a natural born American.

"Natural born" requires being born inside the USA WITH BOTH PARENTS, being AMERICAN citizens.

The current anchor baby rules do NOT apply and were not in force at the time of his alleged birth. The actual date of which is still in question as Obama has also claimed another birth date some four years earlier!

Possibly to evade Hawaii being or not being a State on that date in time.

On a personal level, it is hard to believe that a real, patriotic American, who loves his country would destroy his nation the way Obama appears hell bent on doing as fast as possible and before perhaps losing both House and Senate in November and thus his ability to ram his radical Marxist-Islamic policies down our throats by force and against our will.