Alan update: The titular head of the Moslem Brotherhood, Yousef Qaradawi has arrived in Cairo to influence the situation for his Moslem Brotherhood.
Is it really just a coincidence that Obama has started pounding on the Egyptian military to hand over power to civilians EVEN if it means to the terrorist organization called the Moslem Brotherhood? As if that is not EXACTLY what Obama wants to happen! And in Libya and in Tunisia and now in Morocco and emerging in Jordan and growing in all Middle East and Persian Gulf nations where there used to be any resistance to the Moslem Brotherhood. He has and is destabilizing and shoving their leadership under the bus to make room for his Moslem Brotherhood buddies. Who give him his marching orders from their desks in the White House!
Wake up America and realize to what extent Obama is selling us out to Islam, which is no friend of the USA.
Herewith, please find an analysis of Dr. Bassam Abdallah's article:
In 1929 Britain, the "Old Colonizer", established the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Organization (hereinafter known as the "Organization") with a mission to protect its interests and exert its dominance over the Islamic world in which, of course, many of the most prolific oil-producing countries are located.
However, to disguise its mission and role, the Old Colonizer stipulated that the Organization be established as Hassan Al Banna of Egypt.
To achieve such a goal, the Organization (currently protected and comfortably esconced in the Obama White House) assassinated or at least greatly subdued the activities of anyone who opposed it.
For assurance that its aims would be realized, the Old Colonizer instituted a dictum that rulers of Islamic countries are to be Freemasons. In Iran, for example, three prime ministers, Hossein Hajeer, General Haji Ali Razmara, and Hassanali Mansour, who were not Freemasons, were assassinated by the Organization's members.
Moreover, the entire political systems and governmental infrastructures were undermined in the countries which opposed the Old Colonizer via the Organization. This happened in Iran whereby not only the Shah was deposed but in addition, most of the patriotic and loyal people in his government were done away with; the agent to this end was an American president, Jimmy Carter (see below).
However, to disguise its mission and role, the Old Colonizer stipulated that the Organization be established as Hassan Al Banna of Egypt.
To achieve such a goal, the Organization (currently protected and comfortably esconced in the Obama White House) assassinated or at least greatly subdued the activities of anyone who opposed it.
For assurance that its aims would be realized, the Old Colonizer instituted a dictum that rulers of Islamic countries are to be Freemasons. In Iran, for example, three prime ministers, Hossein Hajeer, General Haji Ali Razmara, and Hassanali Mansour, who were not Freemasons, were assassinated by the Organization's members.
Moreover, the entire political systems and governmental infrastructures were undermined in the countries which opposed the Old Colonizer via the Organization. This happened in Iran whereby not only the Shah was deposed but in addition, most of the patriotic and loyal people in his government were done away with; the agent to this end was an American president, Jimmy Carter (see below).
Hosny Mubarak, like the Shah, who was a great leader and an American loyal ally, was destroyed by Obama. Consequently, right after Mubarak stepped down, the Organization gained notable power in all countries affected by its tyrannical activities.
Furthermore, only a few weeks after Mubarak left office, the British foreign minister visited Egypt accompanied by four heads of arms-producing companies. One needs to bear in mind that the country's entire army was equipped with American arms but now that lucrative market was being handed over at least partially to British arms makers.
Mr. Obama, in his speech in Cairo, talked about his Islamic background, which speaking for himself personally was acceptable.
However, such certainly was not the case with his announcement on behalf of 300,000,000 Americans when he stated that America is no longer a Christian nation.
This indeed was a blatant violation of the basic rights of a majority of Americans. A president had no right to divest America orally of its religious history and Christian foundations.
Furthermore, only a few weeks after Mubarak left office, the British foreign minister visited Egypt accompanied by four heads of arms-producing companies. One needs to bear in mind that the country's entire army was equipped with American arms but now that lucrative market was being handed over at least partially to British arms makers.
Mr. Obama, in his speech in Cairo, talked about his Islamic background, which speaking for himself personally was acceptable.
However, such certainly was not the case with his announcement on behalf of 300,000,000 Americans when he stated that America is no longer a Christian nation.
This indeed was a blatant violation of the basic rights of a majority of Americans. A president had no right to divest America orally of its religious history and Christian foundations.
All countries whose leaders stepped down or were destroyed by Obama, declared that their new government is Islamic.
In my view, America has played a leading role in the Old Colonizer's achievement of its goal. This could not not be done without help from higher-ups in the American governmental hierarchy.
This is what Dr. Essam Abdullah elucidated in his Article. The Old Colonizer's main objective is to take back whatever America won via the Revolutionary War in the eighteenth century. Moreover, it would appear that President Jimmy Carter played into the hands of the Old Colonizer in 1978 by assisting in the toppling of the late Shah's entire governmental system.
And it was American diplomats, not British, who were taken hostage.
Also, American Marines, not their British counterparts, were killed by a suicide attack in Lebanon.
America, not Britain, was viciously and methodically attacked on September 11, 2001.
Britain has realized a hundred-billion dollars in profit from trade with Iran. However, such has certainly not been the case with America.
And why Obama is apparently given carte blanche by the Legislative and Judicial Branches to perpetuate and even further his socialistic and possibly surreptitiously Islamic objectives is most puzzling.
In my view, America has played a leading role in the Old Colonizer's achievement of its goal. This could not not be done without help from higher-ups in the American governmental hierarchy.
This is what Dr. Essam Abdullah elucidated in his Article. The Old Colonizer's main objective is to take back whatever America won via the Revolutionary War in the eighteenth century. Moreover, it would appear that President Jimmy Carter played into the hands of the Old Colonizer in 1978 by assisting in the toppling of the late Shah's entire governmental system.
And it was American diplomats, not British, who were taken hostage.
Also, American Marines, not their British counterparts, were killed by a suicide attack in Lebanon.
America, not Britain, was viciously and methodically attacked on September 11, 2001.
Britain has realized a hundred-billion dollars in profit from trade with Iran. However, such has certainly not been the case with America.
And why Obama is apparently given carte blanche by the Legislative and Judicial Branches to perpetuate and even further his socialistic and possibly surreptitiously Islamic objectives is most puzzling.
Gentlemen, America must cease being an agent and party to British aims of regaining American colonial territories. And America must extricate itself from its present state of being led down the wrong path by a liberal and socialistic president and return to its highly successful form of democracy where individual initiative and accountability reigns supreme.
Regards
Dr. A. Samadani
=================================================================
Where are the Muslim Brotherhood and the Obama Administration Taking America?
Dr. Essam Abdallah
October 31, 2011
In this article, published in the leading liberal pan Arab "Elaph”, Egyptian liberal writer Dr. Essam Abdallah exposes the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood within the Obama Administration and the campaign led by CAIR and its allies against Middle East Christians, US experts and American Muslim reformers.
Abdallah's article is powerful evidence to a reckless policy of backing Islamists, perpetrated by the Obama Administration and its advisors on Islamic affairs.
Disturbing reports are coming out of Washington, D.C.
These reports reveal the depth of the below-the-surface coordination between the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Libya and Jordan.
This bloc of regimes and organizations is now becoming the greatest Islamist radical lobby ever to penetrate and infiltrate the White House, Congress, the State Department and the main decision making centers of the US government.
All of this is happening at a time when the US government is going through its most strategically dangerous period in modern times because of its need to confront the Iranian Mullahs regime, which is expanding in the Middle East, as well as penetrating the United States, via powerful and influential allies.
It looks like the near future will uncover many surprises after the fall of the Gaddafi regime, as we realize more and more that the popular revolts in the Arab world - and the Obama Administration’s position towards them - were determined by political battles between various pressure groups in Washington.
Moreover, pressures by these lobbying groups have left an impact on the region's events, the last of which was the canceling of the visit of Maronite Patriarch Rahi to Washington. A number of Arab and Western news agencies have leaked that one of “those who sought to cancel this visit was Dalia Mujahid, a top advisor on Islamic and Arab affairs at the State Department, who is of Egyptian origin.
And that”, said the reports, “came at the request of the high command of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who wish to see the US Administration support the Islamist Sunni current.”
Also very noticeable at this point is the growing domination of Islamist forces around the Mediterranean: the victory of the Nahda Islamist Party in Tunisia, the declaration by (TNC Chairman) Mustafa Abdeljalil that Libya is an Islamist state and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
These developments wouldn't have happened without the approval of the United States. A document published in Washington indicated that Egypt will face more violence and tensions while moving to the Pakistani, rather than the Turkish, model.
Egypt will be ruled by an opportunistic bourgeoisie and a regime declaring itself Islamist, and it will be backed by a military institution. The military will be used by the Islamists to maintain power but the armed forces, the parliament, the regime and the constitution will all become Islamist.
In return, the Maronite Patriarch is denied a visit to Washington, Coptic Christian churches are destroyed in Egypt, and Coptic demonstrators are massacred at Maspero in Cairo by the Egyptian military, demonstrating that the goal is to suppress Christians in the Middle East, who are - as Patriarch Rahi said - paying a high price for the revolts of the Arab Spring.
Rahi expressed his concerns about the fate of Syrian and Lebanese Christians and sees, as does the world, the flight of millions of Iraqi and Middle Eastern Christians from their homelands as a result of events in Iraq, and the methodic persecution against the Copts. The Christians of Egypt aren't only facing suppression and ethnic cleansing but a form of genocide.
The real question now is: who is allowing the Muslim Brotherhood lobby to damage the relationship between the US Administration and millions of Middle East Christians?
This lobby was able to delay meetings between leaders from Coptic Solidarity International, including Magdi Khalil and Adel Guindy, with the US Government.
Similar obstructions have been happening with Chaldean and Assyrian delegations over the past few years.
Moreover, the Muslim Brotherhood has waged a hysterical campaign against prominent experts in counterterrorism such as Steven Emerson, Daniel Pipes, John Guandolo and Robert Spencer.
One particularly rough campaign was waged by CAIR against Professor Walid Phares, one of the most important, and even prescient, experts in counterterrorism and Jihadist movements in the US.
In his book, “The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle East”, Dr. Phares predicted its evolution and the shape of coming Islamist regimes in the region.
But the Muslim Brotherhood’s campaign is not limited to liberal Arabs, Christians, Jews and Atheists.
It has also targeted Muslims who oppose the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) lobby such as:
Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, the President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD); Sherkoh Abbas, from the Syrian Kurdish Council;
Farid Ghadri; the Somali-American author Ayan Hirsi Ali;
Ali al Yammi;
Tarek Fatah and many more.
Attacking Muslim liberals in the West helps the Muslim Brotherhood's project in the radical Islamization of the Middle East, but it does not at all help US interests.
Oppressing opposition, diversity, pluralism, and shedding human rights and freedoms are in direct contradiction to the values defended, and sacrificed for, by America's founding fathers as well as by all those who fought wars for America throughout her history.
These intimidation and suppression campaigns directed against Arab and Middle East Christians – and against intellectuals and researchers opposing the Muslim Brotherhood and its sinister ties to Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran - in fact are aimed at America’s ability to become aware of the threat all of them pose to American freedoms.
For American strength isn't only in its navies and military power, but in its Constitution and the laws which provide the moral force for all other distinctly American liberties.
(Alan note: which Obama is hell bent on destroying and suppressing)
Note that the US Constitution did not include any suppressive articles (regarding freedom of religion or freedom of speech), the lack of which is the case in many Middle Eastern countries. Rather, it was written in the spirit of a Jeffersonian federal democracy based on individual freedoms.
So, all things considered both here and in the Middle East, where exactly are the Obama Administration and the Muslim Brotherhood lobby, together, taking America? And why?
(Alan note: Or is that a silly question? A question exactly like WHY did he give official Presidential pardons recently to five LOW LEVEL drug dealers and commuted the sentence of a sixth. What secrets is he hiding there? The Moslem Brotherhood aspects are obvious with a self-serving person like Islamist Obama angling to become Secretary General of the United Nations and later the Head or very high up in the global Islamic Caliphate the Moslem Brotherhood is trying to establish by using them and Islamic terrorism to achieve support for both these selfish positions).
Dr. Essam Abdallah is an Egyptian liberal intellectual who writes for the leading liberal pan Arab "Elaph”.
No comments:
Post a Comment