Friday, December 30, 2011


Obama and his family as people are proving socially beneath contempt and my opinion of him puts this low life as a person at beneath my notice - of him as a person of whatever color or persuasion. He hovers in the region of the reasons why I would never accept to sit and eat with my servants back in Iran. They did not have the capacity to deal with this confusing "elevation". Not because I was snobbish. 

What I cannot stomach is what he and his family do by abusing/mis-spending abusing/misusing America and hypocritically living on "do as I say, not as I do"! Exempting  themselves from any decent human behavior or consideration of what is best for America rather than what they selfishly want for themselves and their self-gratification. Including selling out our nation to Islamic agendas.


Here are some examples of their mindsets:

On a $4M Vacation, Michelle Seeks $3 From Backers
by Keith Koffler on December 30, 2011, 1:21 pm

Speaking from her paradisical (PARASITICAL?) $4 million Hawaii vacation, Mrs. Obama wants to know: Do any of President Obama’s supporters have $3 to spare for his reelection?

This is approximately like coming upon Warren Buffett on a street corner with a McDonald’s cup asking if he can have 15 cents.
Michelle’s request was part of an email sent to the Obama 2012 list today.

Over the next 11 months we’ve got an organization to grow, voters to register, and people to get fired up.

I hope you’ll close out this year by donating $3 or more now to help make sure we’re ready for the next one . . .

Thank you so much, and happy new year,


The obscene juxtaposition of the first lady on a $4 million (two week) vacation while asking what would have to be middle to low income earners for three bucks – who else would they be targeting with such an appeal? – is yet another example of lack of perspective the Obamas seem to be gaining while in power.

Mrs. Obama takes extravagant vacations to Spain and southern Africa. The president golfs obsessively and is currently dining at Honolulu’s ritziest restaurants. All while asking their fellow Americans to “sacrifice” during this time of not plenty.

And they blow $4 million – mostly taxpayers’ money – on a vacation, while wondering if the small people can come up with $3.

What about renting a beach house next year at the Jersey shore? I mean, if we’re all going to sacrifice.

And NOT have these low class "wannabees" /parasites emulate French history (mostly atttributed to Queen Marie Antoinette) and angrily shout " if they cannot afford BREAD to eat let them eat CAKE!" at the poor in America. While the White House cooks them  $120 a pound beef! All the above at taxpayer costs!

Alan note: they are very low class nouveau riche "parvenues" who would never be accepted in any decent society without the current White House vehicle. Or as might be termed in America, "trash".

Carney Dodges Questions on Michelle’s Hawaii Flight

by Keith Koffler on December 17, 2011, 9:26 pm

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney Friday declined to answer questions about whether it is appropriate that First Lady Michelle Obama is travelling separately from the president to her Hawaii vacation, forcing taxpayers to pay for two flights to get the family out there.

Obama had to delay his vacation while Congress wraps up its business. Michelle left anyway.

The price tag for the first lady’s separate travel is likely in excess of $100,000, and quite possibly a lot more.

Carney declined to comment on the wisdom of billing taxpayers for an extra trip. Making matters worse for the West Wing – the first lady’s offices are in the East Wing – Obama only recently issued a directive urging agencies to cut down on miscellaneous costs like travel.

Carney appeared to be obliquely criticizing my story earlier this week on Michelle’s travel, calling the piece “interesting” but not detailing any specific objections.

If anything, I’ve been conservative in my estimate, since the one-way cost of the Air Force jet that ferried her there is in excess of $60,000, and the plane presumably has to be flown back to the mainland. And then there’s security, logistics, and a possible cargo plane flight that often accompanies first ladies on such trips.

Here’s the exchange between Carney and a reporter.

Q Yes. The First Lady is going to be leaving in a few hours for Hawaii. Obviously she isn’t able to go with the President. But I wanted to ask, isn’t it quite an extravagance — four people to go in two jets to Hawaii — particularly given the state of the economy, the state of the budget, and also given the directive that was just put out about limiting air travel by the administration?

MR. CARNEY: Two things, Mike. First of all, I think you ought to check your sourcing on that. I think the original story was an interesting one. But the First Lady and their daughters –

Q — another story, but –

MR. CARNEY: The First Lady and their daughters will be traveling today, as originally planned, for their annual holiday trip to visit their family in the President’s home state of Hawaii. As previous First Ladies have done, they will travel on a military aircraft.

Q But, I mean, couldn’t they wait, everybody go on one — so there’s one jet instead of two.

MR. CARNEY: Well, I think it was that –

Q I mean, Air Force One is $185,000 an hour to operate, and that’s a long flight (to Hawaii).

MR. CARNEY: Again, as previous First Ladies have done, they will travel on a military aircraft. As previous First Ladies have done, they will travel separate from the President on a — and that has been a practice in previous administrations. As you know, the President has made clear for a long time now that he will stay to ensure that Congress gets its work done.

It also seems Carney is trying to suggest that the first lady’s separate travel was routine and pre-planned. NOT SO!

If it was scheduled as a separate flight, this would still be due to the threat of her having to miss a few days of vacation, since the plan in the past has been that they go together. The Obamas traveled to Hawaii together in 2009 and were supposed to in 2010, when Obama was also delayed and she decided to leave on time on a separate flight – also at a cost of tens of thousands to taxpayers.

White House: No Round Trip Excursion for Bo

by Keith Koffler on December 24, 2011, 10:55 pm

The White House says First Dog Bo was not flown back from Hawaii to be with the lonely President Obama in Washington and to attend at photo op with him at PetSmart.

Apparently, a report in the Chicago Sun-Times saying Bo had gone to Hawaii with Michelle and the girls last weekend was not correct, and a Bo sighting reported by the Honolulu Star-Advertiser was mistaken.

White House Dossier earlier this week reported that either these stories were wrong or Bo had turned tail and come back home!

Now – this is pretty funny – the man who reported the Bo siting has released a statement saying he made a mistake. Very fancy.

From the follow-up Star Advertiser story:

This afternoon, Miscovich released the following statement: “It is now clear my wife saw another black dog walking our neighborhood. We would like to apologize to Bo and the Obama family for any inconvenience this may have caused them. We would also like to wish them a peaceful and Merry Christmas.”

Looks like Bo’s goons got to him.

No comments: