COMMON USA REVERSE DISCRIMINATION IN RACE & RELIGION

The animals, pictured below the photo of the victims, car-jacked, then raped Christopher Newsom, cut off his penis, then set him on fire and fatally shot him several times while they forced his girlfriend, Channon Christian, to watch.

An even more cruel fate awaited her!

Channon Christian, was beaten and gang-raped in many ways for four days by all of them, while they took turns urinating on her.

Then they cut off her breast and put chemicals in her mouth ... and then murdered her.

Where "be" the Revs Al and Jesse?

Are they providing counsel and help to the families of the victims?

Of course not - the victims were white.

Why hasn't this received extended National coverage by the news media like the Duke "rape" case?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white.

Why hasn't the NAACP, ACLU, New York Times etc, called for an investigation?

Must be cause the victims were white.

Why hasn't the FBI been called in to investigate this as a hate crime?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white.

Alan note: Is this the same double standard that makes the Democrats and liberals, who scream at so-called injustice and then ignore it, also do the same with virulent Islamic jihad?

To appease it as they do with black reverse racism?

Or is it that there are enough black "muslims" inside the USA as voters or political power groups, resembling these animals, to provide an umbrella of fear for the jihadists - just as they do for their counterparts in the USA?

Islam quite simply preaches to kill or enslave anyone who differs with them. Even violently.

Other than being different, what did this white couple ever do to the black group who so violated them?

What makes our Congress forbid Christmas but in abject "dhimmitude" promote Islam's Ramadan?

U.S. Rep Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

Only weeks after voting for a resolution that "recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world," nine Democrats in the U.S. House refused to vote for a Christmas resolution that condemns the worldwide persecution of Christians.

U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., was on the list of those who endorsed the statement recognizing Islam, but refused to support the Christmas resolution that noted the holiday "is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and around the world."

The Christmas resolution, like the Ramadan resolution, decried the violencethat targets religion around the world.

A spokesman for DeGette said her vote was because the Ramadan resolution which she endorsed, was about "rejecting religious extremism and promotingof religious tolerance."

OH SURE !!! SHE WENT TO POLITICANS SCHOOL TO COME OUT WITH THIS ASSHOLE STATEMENT. Islam is not religiously extreme?

.The spokesman, Chris Aaron, however, said DeGette is a "strong supporter of separation of church and state and her view was that Congress should not favor one religion over another. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT SHE DID!!!!!!!!

Alan note: Does THIS FEMALE DHIMMIE not realize that in Islam the religion IS the State? And any separation is against the word of Allah and punishable by death?


"She felt this resolution (recognizing Christmas and condemning persecutionof Christians) promoted Christianity over other religions," he added.

Other Democrats who supported the acknowledgment of Islam's Ramadan but refused a similar recognition for Christianity's Christmas included:

GaryAckerman and Yvette Clarke of N.Y.,
Alcee Hastings, Fla.,
Barbara Lee, Fortney Stark and Lynn Woolsey, Calif.,
Jim McDermott, Wash., and
RobertScott, Va.

Both resolutions, carrying similar wording, ultimately were approved. But the American Family Association of Pennsylvania also raised the issue of representatives supporting Ramadan, but refusing to offer the same supportfor Christmas.

"We are very pleased that 17 of our 19 congressmen voted to recognize the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith.

Congressman John Murtha was one of 40 who did NOT vote ( A REAL CHICKEN S--T FOR SURE ) and unfortunately Congresswoman Allyson Schwartzd ecided to simply vote 'present' rather than take a stand on such a controversial issue as Christmas," said Diane Gramley, president.

She noted on Oct. 2, Schwartz "did not hesitate" to vote for a resolution to support the religion "of the 19 hijackers of 9/11 who brought down the World Trade Center, flew their airliner/missile into the Pentagon, and caused the death of the crew and passengers of Flight 93 as it crashed into a field outside Shanksville, Pa."

"I believe there are more Christians in her district than Muslims and they deserve an explanation for her vote last night," Gramley said.

According to Liberty Counsel, the Christmas resolution was approved with nine "no" votes. Ten others voted "present" and 40 refused to vote at all.

"Amazingly, all but two of the representatives who answered "present" or voted against the Christmas resolution voted in favor of a resolution recognizing Ramadan, even though much of the language was similar," the group said.

The Ramadan resolution began: Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and

Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramandan commenced at dusk on September 13, 2007, and continues for one lunar month: …

"The Christmas resolution started: Whereas Christmas, a holiday of great significance to Americans and many other cultures and nationalities, is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and the world...

Whereas on December 25 of each calendar year, American Christians observe Christmas, the holiday celebrating the birth of their savior, Jesus Christ...

Whereas many Christians and non-Christians throughout the United States and the rest ofthe world, celebrate Christmas as a time to serve others:

"The Ramadan resolution then acknowledged "the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world," expressed "friendship and support for Muslims" noted "the onset of Ramadan," and rejected "hatred, bigotry, and violence directed against Muslims."

It also "commends Muslims … who have privatelyand publicly rejected interpretations and movements of Islam that justify and encourage hatred."

The Christmas resolution continued to acknowledge "the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world," expressed "continued support for Christians," noted the historical importance of Christmas, the role "played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States," and rejected "bigotry and persecution directed against Christians, both in theUnited States and worldwide."

"Notice that the Christmas resolution uses similar language. It is astonishing that those who supported the Ramadan Resolution would vote against the Christmas Resolution," Liberty Counsel said.

The group suggested voters check the lists for votes by their representatives. "If they voted against Christmas and in favor of Ramadan, respectfully point out their hypocrisy," the group said.

Concerned Women for America said the true message of Christmas is under assault in the U.S.

Shari Rendall, director of the group's legislation and public policy divisions, noted Congress earlier approved not only the endorsement of Ramadan but also another resolution concern the Hindu religion.

"It astounds me that any member of Congress would oppose legislation that recognizes the important of Christmas in our country, particularly in light of the fact that earlier this year Congress passed two separate resolutions honoring the Hindu and Islamic religions…"

TEXAS VISITOR COMMENT & QUESTIONS DECEMBER 2007

Recently, I received an Email from Ken Timmerman indicating that proof against Abbas Fakhravar, a letter ordering an Islamic Iran passport for him to travel and leave the country - while he was ostensibly being pursued with orders to shoot him on sight - has been delivered and publicized by a recent defector from Iran.

I had written this matter up back in 2006 as part of a piece on Islamic Iran's security  and our acceptance of infiltrators! (good read).
(http://noiri.blogspot.com/2006/12/irans-security-apparatus.html) 
and went looking for it.

And, to my astonishment, found the article below in my archives when searching for Abbas Fakhravar who had been "outed" as a shill on AntiMullah shortly after he "escaped" with that passport and showed up in the USA.
 







He is currently using US government money, provided by the State Department, to sabotage American interests.

I have  no recollection of this flattering "conversation" and show the address and phone  number of the other party as it had already been published back in 2007.

Formatting disappears in archived articles and I'm too tired to redo it so forgive the huge lumps of text.




   
FIRST EMAIL RECEIVED: Mr. Peters: I have followed your site for years admiring your presence of mind and honesty. I think you call the shots as they are. I note you have have lain off the US vs. Iran theme in terms of an attack for some time now. Like many of us, perhaps you are tired of waiting for something to happen. My popcorn has gotten soggy and my soda warm for all the times I thought it would happen. Since the Bush administration has embraced the NIE whose study says that Iran has stopped Nuclear weapon development, I am curious if you care to make a prediction of events. For the next 12 months. I think nothing will happen for the following reasons. I think the matter of hiding behind the NIE report is politically motivated. No one believes the report, least of all the Bush administration. I think Bush is just getting out of attacking Iran. I think Bush is under enormous pressure from the Pro Israeli factions in the US Government to attack Iran. This is his way out. I think he has chosen this decision at this time for a number of reasons: Annapolis showed the Bush people that there would be no united Arab front against Iran. Everyone would go where the wind blew. Israel has not been given enough time until the next administraiton to cross the line and attack. This is so because as a new administration takes office in One year the Pro Israeli lobby can get to work on the next administration to get them to do their work for them. If Israel attacks in the interval, they must go it alone. At leasy initially. Who would give up the chance to have someone else do the job by the mere passage of time? Especially if one must wait only a year? If Israel attacks now, the opportunity is lost, so they must sit and wait as they know it matters not who is in power, they can pressure either party equally well. So the Bush people have put Israel in a Box by giving them this decision at this time, with so little time until someone else makes decisions. I think you see the Israeli reaction in recent public discussion of an Israeli attack in the absence of a US deterrent and the other information that has made public indicating the obvious, that Iran continues to pursue a fission weapons system; all to stir the great American fear. Which is: What if Israel acts alone? How do we control or influence the unintended consequences of a middle east regional conflict if we are not the initiators? The Israelis know this will fail to interest the Americans in putting the Military option back on the table for 2008. So I think the odds of a US/Israeli attack in 2008 is low. However, this does not rule out another9/11 type provocation by those interested in causing the US/Israel and Iran clash to move into prominence now. There are many parties with such an interest. These include domestic US/Israeli/Iranian interests and others external to these countries who simply want to see all these entities engaged in a dispute that crosses the threshold of force because it benefits them. Then again, external interests have much less ability to falsify a direct attack on the US/Israel, or Iran that is attributable to any of these three powers. Hence, I rate this possibility relatively low. What is your view and prognosis for the next 12 Months? If you like you can post my email and your response on your site. Thanx, Robert A. Montserrat

REPLY - ANTIMULLAH OPINION: Your writing format for your "question" is a very professional and recognizable one :-)) Takes practice. Here is an oblique non-answer since I can only speculate and it's a coin toss. And my formatting is not a formal one. Even journalistic, perhaps. Bush went from a very preoccupied, concerned man with the weight of the world on his shoulders, bumping into walls when going through doors to someone in peace and one who had made a difficult decision some two or so months ago. I first thought he had internally justified killing half a million paramilitary IRGC and Basiji to save the world as we know it in his mind and soul. He might have known about the NIE report as far back as then but I believe it caught him by surprise - specially the disloyalty to him and to the USA. Having floated around at those levels I know how knowledge can appear out of nowhere from a brown noser with vaccilating loyalties to his own "group". Perhaps seeking some reward from the top man. So Bush may have heard. Will Israel attack? Only under huge pressure. Will the USA attack? Probably will have to. Bush the cowboy may finally decide that if he doesn't take care of business the possible next Clinton administration will refuse to take action and our world will actually go poof! Like when the former Clinton admin. failed to take essential steps to prevent the dollar being disconnected from the purchase of oil and going into Iraq became unavoidable. Poor execution of the war does not change the inevitable do or die situation Bush faced then and will again with Iran. Sadly, there are moments when I feel I know more about Iran than our three letter acronyms who should be experts but who constantly fall for Iranian disinformation. Our biggest failing is our inability to effectively conduct counter-intelligence and psyops. We seem to accept with open arms the infiltrators the Mullahs send us. Frustrating, watching this repeat itself again and again. Like Akbar Ganji, Amir Abbas Fakhravar and a string of others. I now know more about them than our government appears to. I have not copied your other copied recipients out of politeness since you can share this with them. I cut off contacting the Homeland Security section of State DOJ in my State when I saw they did not understand counter-intelligence and were not really equipped to action intel provided to them. As you said, I say it as I see it and have no personal fears of the acronyms nor an axe to grind. They do their best but too often rely on enemy Mullah shills like Trita Parsi and even self-declared Mullah supporters like Houshang Amir Ahmadi of Rutgers and that kind of person as it is the easiest channel to produce reports, slanted as they end up being in line with the Mullah talking points. They do not have in depth reference about Iran and the revolution to establish a measure by which to assess truth and fiction. Like the State Homeland people that brought an Iranian to meet me who was seven years old when the Khomeini revolution happened, had worked for them for two years and then added insult to injury by interrogating/confronting me on points about Iran of which he was totally ignorant! Similar to a lance-corporal questioning a 4-star General's global military strategy for the whole armed forces - about which the corporal knows nothing. No, my ego was not bruised. The senselessness of it in front of his supervisor he was trying to impress showed me how flawed their mind sets were and how they had to rely on novices, who happened to speak Farsi. Discouraging when we are dealing with ruthless Islamists and risk being destroyed yet field beginners. Back on subject, an excuse to attack can be triggered, new intel can appear (and there is enough to produce - even of the Iraq type if need be) - and Bush has nothing to lose. Much will depend on how the voting preliminaries go and what those tea leaves will produce. If the Repubs look like losing anyway, Bush will attack. Israel is not the fulcrum for the decision. If the tea leaves show a probable Repub win in the offing, Bush will feel let off the hook as he can half way count on the next Pubs to attack Iran if need be. Below is some relevant general commentary. P.S. Thanks for your laudatory comments about my site/writing. Stay in touch.

COMMENTARY The latest in the US Persian media, much of which apparently receives funding/pay off from Iran’s Mullahs is that British Intelligence intercepts of Iranian military communications, showed they were complaining as to why the nuclear weapon programs had been stopped. Rock and a hard place similar to Iraq. Here we have to distinguish between the paramilitary IRGC (Revolutionary Guards) and the formal armed forces, which are currently a second class military below the IRGC and the Basiji internal suppression forces.The official/regular armed forces have been steadily DISARMED as Ahmadi-Nejad does not trust them. The regular military would also receive disinformation so that they would pass this on. IRGC commanders, included purposefully in the strategy would confirm this to any questions - to continue the charade. AND to continue the pretence for the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). as Iran must certainly know Western intel would be listening to their communications as Standard Operational Procedure (SOP). Remember the Islamic Republic intel agencies are receiving immediate intel from both Russia and China about Western anti-Iran activity. Specially Russia which monitors Western communications as SOP. Incidently the new Commander of the Basiji (internal suppression) has been put in charge of the IRGC as well as his own group of mostly mercenaries - in a reverse of the former chain of command. As a side-bar, the former commander of the IRGC, Zolghadr, who was posted to the Ministry of Interior by the Supreme Ruler Khamenei himself, has quit. Ostensibly to do research! The standard excuse for several recent high level resignations. Considerable in-fighting and power struggles are bubbling up. Meanwhile, the apparent correct origin of the intel that triggered the NIE analysis is a “defector” - former Islamic deputy minister of war who disappeared to the West in Turkey some months ago and with whom the US intel has reportedly NEVER talked! If I were doing counter-intel and psyops for Iran and had apparently lost this high asset to the West, (still not clear if he is not a plant, or made vulnerable by having a former wife and children still inside Iran) I would identify who his senior military contacts/colleagues are or were and pass disinformation to them to pass onto him if and when they were clandestinely contacted by him and thus to his new “masters”. Counter-Intel 101. If the Mullahs did not think of it, the Russians would have instructed them correctly (from their point of view). Thus again, Islamic Iran’s tactics (as above), falling on fallow ground of anti-Bush elements in the US intel community has allowed them to stupefy, sabotage and disarm our efforts in the world community. A give-away - on one US based Persian TV commentary (very pro-Dems and certainly on the Mullah payroll) was that Bush had to flip-flop and admit Iran was not working on making weapons and therefore should negotiate with Iran and not attack the Islamic Republic - which ANYWAY - in a matter of a few years - WOULD BECOME AN IMPOSSIBILITY!!! How come? Unless in a few years an array of nuclear weapons (which are NOT being made, right?) would create a stand-off position for the Mullahs!!! Or is it also the belief that by then jihadist Islam would have taken over to an extent it could influence the USA and perhaps a Democrat President and Congress would be an ally to ensure this happened - even through Dhimmi ignorance rather than intent. As some others have been saying, our enemy within, the Dems and our CYA (cover your ass) intel community (for the most part, not all of them, as we still have really good people but who find themselves emasculated by the anti-Bush ones) are the more immediate and present danger than the Islamic Republic’s nukes. Ostrich heads in the sand mentality being promoted, otherwise called Dhimmi, which means a non-Moslem who promotes and protects Islam and justifies all Islamic action, generally through ignorance, specially as Dhimmis are not allowed to read the Koran. Since it may take the Mullahs some more time (quite short) to create enough new fissionable material with 3,000+ centrifuges to revitalize the fading nuke material they got from the Ukraine etc., and with North Korea’s help built into six to 12 VIABLE nuclear nose cones on mid-range Shahab missiles, they could well claim they are not making NEW weapons. The way NIE and the "drive-by media" have been presenting the situation to deny our fears, we will wake up (hopefully still alive) to a nuclear event or events (probably in Israel but possibly in Washington D.C., more likely in New York and perhaps in the port of Los Angeles. Or at the very least in another effort to do an underground test to claim membership in the world’s nuclear family. Along the lines of the indeterminate nuke test by North Korea, where doubts exist as to whether it was nuclear or lots of conventional explosives. Also, just as Saddam Hussein, under pressure for his WMD efforts, outsourced them to Libya and sent 30,000 Iraqi and Syrian physicists, scientists and workers there to continue the projects - away from scrutiny focused inside Iraq - now Iran has outsourced to Syria *and North Korea). There, ample experienced scientists of WMD technology are available and as such, apart from uranium enrichement for the revitalization of old nukes continuing, Iran can pretend to have stopped efforts for creating nukes inside Iran. But NOT so inside Syria where efforts continue with Mullah funding. Including simple acquisition of fissionable material the Israelis destroyed before it could be shipped to Iran. Note: if you have Farsi speaking friends, the English article on Slavery & Rape in Islam posted on http://www.antimullah.com a few days ago will go up in the Home Page in Farsi by the end of today (Sunday). Please let them know. An eye-opener. Link to the English article will be included in case you missed this very informative presentation.

FOLLOW UP EMAIL RECEIVED: He answered! Alan Peters is one of the Top individual analysts regarding Iran. Unlike the clowns and Shills we listen to like Iran controlled plants like Chalabi, and “Academics” who come to their conclusions reading the newspapers and talking to their Imam (and other Iranian intelligence assets) at the Mosque, Alan has actually worked and LIVED in Iran. Few People understand the scene as well as he does. The closest was an Iranian woman I represented who was the highest civil Administrator in the history of Iran, but again, she was appointed by the Shah and had left Iran for over 25 years before I got to know her. Anyway, Alan has a lot to say, he gently chides me subtly for not telling him who I am. His web site is: http://www.antimullah.com/ It is one of the best ways to keep up with what is going on in Iran. So Alan will know who asked him q’s: To Contact me: Robert A. Montserrat 2501 Oak Lawn Ave. Suite 350 Dallas, Texas 75219 214.969.6931 Enjoy all! RAM

SEVEN CHAKRA MEDITATION

CLICK ON TITLE/SUBJECT

Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid

by Travis Rowley Oh, you Muslims everywhere, sever the ties of their nation, tear them apart, ruin their economy, instigate against their corporations, destroy their embassies, attack their interests, sink their ships, and shoot down their airplanes. Kill them in land, at sea, and in the air. Kill them wherever you find them. — Sheikh Abdel Rahman WHILE NOBODY enjoys being afraid, fear remains a useful human emotion. Fear fuels human reasoning. And without it, we would not be able to discern the brave from the spineless; the principled from the passive. Yet, when it comes to the threat of Islamic jihad, many from the American left dismiss fear as a destructive instinct — a sensation that can never lead us to truth, but only to irrationality. Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, speaking recently at Brown University, 'repeatedly insisted that Americans’ true enemy, as evidenced by current foreign policy, is fear,' the Brown Daily Herald reported. He told the Ivy League audience, 'Fear is a device to manipulate, and even to govern.' But Patrick was merely echoing what has become a mindless Democratic talking point. For the past several years Democrats have relentlessly asserted that President Bush has shamelessly exploited the threat of global jihad. In 2005, Sen. John Kerry (D.-Mass.) accused the president of 'playing the politics of fear and smear.' In 2006, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.) came to the conclusion that the GOP’s political strategy amounted to this sentiment: 'All we’ve got is fear, and we’re going to keep playing the fear card.' Continuing the Democratic drumbeat was Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D.-Ohio), who said that the Bush administration has been 'drumming up fear in order to protect its war agenda.' Liberals can’t imagine anyone being seriously concerned with the threat of Islamic jihad. They actually think conservatives fake their anxiety over foreign hostiles only to cause false national trepidation. In response to Republican 'politics,' liberals speak of human fear as an unnatural and futile emotion (and then resist every Bush-proposed counter-terrorism measure). I can just see Democrats in 1775 castigating Paul Revere for fear-mongering. Yeah, okay, Paul. Suuuure the British are coming. While liberals remain the only group demanding more evidence than two smoldering towers to prove that America is under attack, their naïvetÉ shows why they can’t be trusted with the national reins. In defending Columbia University’s recent invitation to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Dean John Coatsworth argued that Columbia would have also invited Adolf Hitler in 1939, but not in 1944, when the United States was at war with him. Fair enough. Coatsworth’s position maintained the academy’s principles of open discourse while not abandoning the values of patriotism. But Coatsworth’s declaration spoke volumes in regards to the left’s worldview. Liberals still don’t accept the premise that we are at war with Iran. They think we’re at war with President Bush. Ironically, that’s why they attempt to make everyone fear him. Consider a Providence Phoenix article from last year, 'Bush’s Fear Factor': President Bush does not seek to lead so much as he seeks to rule. He’s a royalist by birth and inclination. Elected by a questionable majority and re-elected by a narrow one, he uses fear and division to prosecute his agenda. He was dangerous when he was triumphant and is positively menacing now that he’s wounded. Complacency in the face of his threat is not merely foolish: It is reckless. . . . Bush has cowed so many into fearing there’s a potential terrorist under every citizen’s bed. What are the prospects for democracy if truth tellers are muzzled? Or consider Rep. Peter Stark (D.-Calif.), bellowing from the House floor that Republicans are sending children to Iraq 'to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.' All liberal ire is ironic and/or phony. Are we to believe that liberals truly have a problem with alarmist political expression while their own primary message is one that alerts us of President Bush’s wicked intentions? As the left warns us of Bush’s 'threat' and his plans to 'rule,' they astonishingly gather the gall to express disdain for the role fear plays in politics. But aren’t these the people who tell us that the imminent melting of the polar ice caps is sure to drown American coastlines? The jihadist objectives are hardly covert. Islamic fascists across the world have explicitly outlined their desires to establish global Sharia law, recapture Jerusalem, and devastate the United States. They are capable of great patience, and are willing to employ radical measures to accomplish their goals. Their network is highly complex, and sponsoring them is the internationally defiant Iran — a rogue government in pursuit of nuclear capability. The al-Qaida Web magazine al-Jihad has instructed its readers: 'O people of jihad, Jihad during the fasting month of Ramadan has a great taste — for what better way to break your fast than to kill infidels and relish the sound of the weeping of the despicable tyrants and infidels.' And Osama bin Laden has informed his followers that 'more attacks are required. I advise the youth to find more of America’s economic hubs. The enemy can be defeated by attacking its economic centers.' Annoyingly to Democrats, a careful study of the nation’s foreign threats leads most Americans to the conclusion that they have not been duped by fear-mongering. Rather, Republicans have accurately assessed the serious nature of America’s enemies — and are therefore operating from a healthy level of fear. Yet, Governor Patrick told his adoring audience at Brown that 'men feared witches — and burnt women.' This is the liberal logic intended to compel us not to be concerned with Islamic lunatics in search of atomic weaponry.

غفلت زدگی و عدم پذیرش واقعیات زخم های عمیقی بوجود خواهد آورد SLAVERY & RAPE IN ISLAM (Farsi)

LINK TO ENGLISH ARTICLE: Slavery & Rape in Islam click here


غفلت زدگی و عدم پذیرش واقعیات زخم های عمیقی بوجود خواهد آورد.

شاید این سوأل پیش آید که
این زخم های هولناک که توسط چاقو در بدن یک افسر پلیس مسلح ایجاد شده چه ربطی با اسلام دارد.

ضارب توانست این زخم ها را به این علت بر او وارد کند که پلیس مسلح مربوطه شرایط را نتوانسته بود درست مشاهده و محاسبه کند. و از آنجا که مسلح به اسلحه گرم بود فاصله خود را با چاقوی ضارب در نظر نگرفته بود. این درست شرایطی است که ما در محاسبات غلط خود با اسلام مبارز داریم و خطر آنرا برای دنیای غرب درست مشاهده نکرده آنرا سهل می انگاریم.

مداومت در باور اطلاعات غلطی که با هیاهوی بسیار اسلام را دین صلح معرفی میکند در حالیکه اسلام دین سلاخی است.

ایسمی که معرف مرگ و بی رحمی و شقاوت است و تنبیهاتی بی رحمانه بر مطالبی دارد که ما بعنوان دنیای متمدن حتی کوچکترین توجهی به آن نمی کنیم مطالب پیش پا افتاده ای مانند لباسی که میپوشیم ، ولی همین ها در ذهن انسان مسلمان 1400 سال پیش بر طبق قوانین مصرانه اسلام قابل تنبه با چیزهائی نظیر شلاق زدن و تجاوز به عنف و بریدن اعضاء بدن و در آوردن چشم و بریدن زبان و سایر روش های وحشیانه قرون تاریک وسطی بوده است

اعدام ها و سایر تنبیهات بدنی مکررأ و عمدأ در معرض دید عامه برای ایجاد ترس و رعب انجام میگیرد ، تا موجب عدم شهامت و اطاعت مردم از الله یا هر انکس که حکومت مدعی است او با خدا صحبت میکند و کلام او کلام خداست، بشود

در اینجا افسر پلیس خود مسلح بوده اما قانون طلائی حفظ فاصله لازم را بکار نبرده است. فاصله ، فاصله. فاصله ،فاصله، اگر هرگز این سؤال برایتان پیش آمده که چرا افسر پلیس بر روی شخصی که فقط مسلح به چاقوئی بوده درمواردی آتش گشوده است لطفأ به تصاویر زیر نگاه کنید .

ما داریم به غفلت زدگی خود در باره شریعت اسلام ادامه میدهیم و نمی خواهیم باور کنیم که شریعت اسلام تجاوز به عنف و بردگی را مجاز میداند و حتی آنرا بعنوان یک جنبه مثبت اسلام برای توسعه دین لازم میداند و نه تنها آنرا منفی نمیداند بلکه یکی از اصول مسلم این دین بوده و مانند سلاح است در دست آن.

همانند قربانی این حمله اگر فاصله خود را با اسلامی که مکررأ رسومات خود را اعلام میکند حفظ نکنیم و روش خود را با آن مورد ارزش یابی قرار نداده بلکه آنرا با دیده نه یک دین که بهانه ای برای تسکین شهوات است بلکه یک غده ای زهر آگین یا بکلام قران عادت و اعتقاد بدانیم ، آنگاه نخواهیم توانست از این مهلکه جان سالم بدربریم

یک عالم اسلامی اشاره به این مطلب میکند ( در زیر عکس ) که چگونه اسلام وابستگی به عبودیت و تجاوز دارد تا آنرا بعنوان وسیله ای برای رسیدن به هدف خود بکار برد و حال اینکه چنین طریقه ای برای ما در غرب آنچنان ناشناس است که ما قادر نیستیم آنرا درک کنیم و بعنوان یک واقعیت بپذیریم.

ولی چنین است.

ما گرفتار در بند باور روشها و قوانین غربی خود هستیم در حالیکه قوانین شریعت اسلامی میکوشد که قوانین شرعی خود را مانند لبه تیز یک چاقو در ملت ما داخل کند و آنرا از جای برکند تا بتواند یک حکومت خلیفه ای اسلامی در همه دنیا براه اندازد . چیزی که قران و حدیث آنرا هدفی قرار داده است که باید به قیمت جان و اعضاء بدن و هر چیز کافر بدست آورد.

در اینجا میتوان بدیده عبرت به این نوع عدم پذیرش و رد خطری که اسلام سیاسی آنرا برایمان هدف گیری کرده مانند چاقوئی نگریست که حمله کننده بکار برده است، کاملأ آماده است که اگر اجازه دادیم به ما نزدیک شود آنرا بکار برد .

بریدگی در پشت






بریدگی در پهلو








بریدگی در بالای سینه



بیل وارنر مدیر مرکز مطالعات اسلام سیاسی است و سخنگوی سایت
Politicalislam.com

هدف این مرکز اینست که دکترین اسلام سیاسی را از طریق کتابهایش بیاموزد و تا کنون توانسته است یازده سری از این کتاب های اسلام سیاسی به چاپ رساند.

آقای وارنزشخصأ این کتابها را ننوشته بلکه همانند یک نمایندگی برای نویسندگان کتاب که یک گروه دانشمند هستند کار کرده است. آخرین کتاب این مرکز کتابی است بنام

اطاعت زنان و بردگان ، دوگانگی اسلام


آنچه در زیر آمده است بخشی از مصاحبه با مجله فرانت پیج است:

بردگی میوه دوگانگی اسلامی است.

محمد، که استاد دوگانگی و طاعت است، بردگی را بعنوان یک وسیله برای جهاد بکار برد زیرا موثر و کارآمد بود. زندگی محمد با برده داری آمیخته است. بردگی خون حیات بخش اسلام بوده است. محمد که خود سفید پوست بوده بردگان مذکر و مؤنث سیاه پوست داشته است. رفتار او نشان از دوگانگی کامل دارد.

چیزی که در دوگانگی اسلامی بیش از همه چندش آور است، این نیست که مسلمانان دیگران را به بردگی میگیرند بلکه اینست که ما آنرا ندیده گرفته و از آن چشم می پوشیم. بر مسلمانان قران و سنت چیزی است که با شیر مادر اندرون شده. آنها فقط کاری را که مطابق با علم و اخلاق اسلامی است انجام میدهند. بطریقه ای تعجب آور، مسلمانان باید مورد ترحم باشند. یک مسلمان خود اولین قربانی اسلام است.


روش پذیرفته شده در دانشگاه ها تنها انتقاد سیاه پوستان از سفید پوستانی که آنان را به بردگی گرفتند می باشند و رسانه های گروهی نیز بهمین محدودیت اکتفا میکنند.

نخواهید توانست دانشگاهی را در همه دنیا بیابید که در دروس تاریخی خود ذکری از کشتار صدو بیست میلیون آفریقائی کرده باشد برای دست یابی به بیست و چهار میلیون برده سیاه پوست جهت فروش یا استفاده های دیگر.

سیاه پوستان خود را مستمسک و پایه بردگی میدانند. آنها به نوعی از بردگی در ماورای آن یعنی بردگی سفید پوستان و مسیحیان نمی نگرند. در تاریخ سیاه پوستان تنها یک تئوری از بردگی وجود دارد. عمومأ- آفریقائی غربی ، تاریخ خود را بدین ترتیب محدود کرده است.

سیاهان نمی خواهند قبول کنند که تاریخ پهنه وسیعی از بردگی دارد. از نظر آنان

بردگی هندو ؟ هرگز اتفاق نیافتاده


بردگی سفید پوستان و اروپائی ها ؟ هرگز اتفاق نیافتاده

بردگی در ساحل شرقی آفریقا؟ هرگز اتفاق نیافتاده

تجارت انبوه هائی از طریق صحرا در شمال آفریقا ؟ هرگز اتفاق نیافتاده

اخته کردن بردگان سیاه پوست در مساجد مدینه؟ هرگز اتفاق نیافتاده

این تاریخ ناقص بردگی چیزی است که در دانشگاههای وابسته به حمایت مالیات دهندگان آمریکائی میتوان یافت.

چگونه امکان دارد که رهبران سیاه پوستان آمریکا بر بیدادگری مقدس در آفریقا چشم میپوشند؟

چرا نگارندگان و مخبرین و اساتید دانشگاه و رهبران مذهبی سیاه پوست در این باره نمی نویسند و سخن نمی گویند. آنها هم در غفلت زدگی و انکار کامل بسر میبرند. آنها هم اطفال مورد تجاوز قرار گرفته اسلام هستند.
این گروه ترس از خشم سیاه پوستان مسلمان وابسته به اخوان المسلمین دارند و مخصوصأ هراسناک هستند که موقعیت خود را بعنوان- قربانی شده - از دست بدهند.

سیاه پوستان جزو دییمی (این لغت اصطلاحأ به افراد نادانی اطلاق میشود که الزامأ مسلمان نیستند اما بشدت از روش های اسلامی حمایت میکنند. مانند بسیاری از مطبوعات غرب) بوده و با سکوت خود به اسلام خدمت میکنند. ترسی چنان عمیق از اسلام در بین آنان موجود است که موجب میشود خطاهای اسلام را ندیده بگیرند و با اسلام سردوستی داشته باشند.

عرب ها اربابان سیاه پوستان هستند.

چیزی که سیاهان و سفید پوستان در آن شریکند اینست که پدرانشان توسط اسلام به بردگی گرفته شده بودند. و هردو گروه آنان بسیار غفلت زده تر از آن هستند که حتی آنرا بدانند.

سیاهان و سفیدان هر دو خجلتی محرمانه دارند که در زیر انکار مخفی نموده اند و آن اینست که برده اسلامی بوده اند.

اما بقیه رسانه های گروهی و هوشمندان هم به صف دییمی ها پیوسته اند

یکی از علائم دییمی های تحت امر خلیفه چهارم ، عمر، این است که یک یدیمی نباید قران را بخواند.

وجه مشخصه یک دییمی امروزه نادانی و جهالت در باره قران و سلوک و حدیث است . ولی جهالت هوشمندان کافر هم در باره اسلام عمیق و قابل ملاحظه است.

آنها چیزی در این باره نمی دانند که چرا جهادیون، صدوبیست میلیون آفریقائی و شصت میلیون مسیحی و هشتاد میلیون هندو و ده میلیون بودائی را کشتند .

هوشمندان ما چیزی در باره اشکهای جهاد ( در همه کتابهای ما با این تیتر آمده است) نمی دانند. و این غفلت زدگی است در باره این همه مرگ یعنی دویست و هفتاد میلیون مرگ . هوشمندان ما نمی دانند ، و اهمیتی هم به این ندانستن نمی دهند و نمی خواهند هم خود را به زحمت برای یاد گرفتن آن اندازند. لذا انکار میکنند.

درسهای اسلامی دانشگاهها ابدآ اشاره ای به روش سیاسی اسلام نمی کنند.

رسانه های گروهی در باره اسلام بحث های اصلاحی میکنند و آنرا چند فرهنگی و یا با فرهنگی فراگیر میدانند
آموزه های تاریخی را در باره تمدنهائی که بدست جهاد نابود شده نمی آموزند.

رهبران مذهبی امام ها را در ملاء عام مورد احترام قرار میدهند و ابدأ اطلاعی ندارند که این امام در باره آنها چه می اندیشد. متفکران سیاسی حتی به اسلام به چشم یک نیروی سیاسی نگاه نمی کنند.

مشگل این نوع غفلت زدگی این است که هوشمندان ما را از کمک به ما عاجز میکند. آنها قادر نیستند درک کنند که اسلام تمدنی است بر پایه ایده آل دوگانگی

اخلاق و سیاست اسلامی یک سری قانون برای مسلمین دارد و قانون دیگری برای کافران.

تمدنهای ما بر اساس ایده یگانگی و وحدت اخلاقی است ، قانون طلائی . ما دو سری قانون و روش اخلاقی نداریم همانند اسلام . هوشمندان ما نمی توانند توضیح دهند که در گذشته دوگانگی چه مفهومی داشته یا در آینده چه خواهد بود. و آن نابودی تمدن است

هوشمندان ما و رسانه های گروهی تنها یک نظرگاه از اسلام دارند – تمدنی درخشان.
(بطوریکه در حلق آنان ریخته اند)

آنها لغت تروریست را بعنوان یک واژه غیرواقعی از روی غفلت ساختند. و تصور میکنند که تروریست یک مسلمان واقعی نیست بلکه کسی است که بشدت خرافات زده و فناتیک است.

همه این اصطلاحات تنها از نادانی عمیق نسبت به دکترین اسلام سیاسی سرچشمه میگیرد و تنها برای آرام ساختن ما به سرزنشی غلط میپردازند.

هوشمندان ما نمی توانند نقاط آزار بقیه هوشمندان و هنرمندان امروزه را بهم ربط دهند. مانند سلمان رشدی و تائو ون گو و کارتنهای محمد. و دانیل پرل.

این آزار و شکنجه بخشی از فرهنگ 1400 ساله اسلامی است که توانسته همه هوشمندان و هنرمندان را در صف دکترین اسلام سیاسی خود محافظت کند .

اما برای هوشمندان ما تاریخی وجود ندارد، رابطه ای در کار نیست . لذا تنها طریقه موجود برای آنها میتواند روش تکذیب باشد. اینها هوشمندانی هستند که کتابهای درسی ما را مینویسند. لذا پول مالیاتی که ما میپردازم صرف کتابهائی میشود که به غفلت زدگی ما منجر گردد.

چه توضیحی برای این سکوت و غفلت زدگی هوشمندانه داریم؟

خشونت بی انتهای جهاد علائم روانشناسی" طفل مورد تجاوز قرار گرفته" را بوجود آورده است. ترس هوشمندان و پوزش طلبی و آشتی با متجاوزین اسلامی، غفلت از خشونت گذشته.

سپس این هوشمندان دور میزنند و به سیاستمداران اندرز میدهند. نتیجه آن مردمی است غفلت زده که برای راهنمائی به هوشمندان مراجعه میکنند و تنها دروغ و خیانت می یابند.

فراموش میکنند که:

پایه اسلام بر بردگی مبنای اصول اطاعت و دوگانگی در اسلام است.

اصول اطاعت نمی تواند از این واضح تر باشد. بطور مشخص یک برده مطیع ترین آدمها است. شما تنها در صورتی برده میشوید که چاره ای ندارید . یک برده از ارباب باید اطاعت مطلق داشته باشد.

اصول دوگانگی با این حقیقت نشان داده شده که اسلام اجازه برده گرفتن یک مسلمان را نمی دهد بلکه فقط کافران را ( غیر مسلمانان را) البته این قانون اسلام توسط مسلمانان رعایت نمی شد. و همه نوع برده ای داشتند. و همه را با اجبار مسلمان میکردند. و از آنجا که فقط کافران به بردگی گرفتار میشدند نوعی اطمینان خاطر بوجود می آورد که بیشتر مردم دنیا از ترس برده شدن خود مسلمان بشوند. لذا اسلام رشد کند.
بردگی اسلامی بر اساس سه پایه بود - قران – سلوک ( زندگی محمد) و حدیث ( رسوم محمد) .
هر سه متن اجازه برده داری میداد ، اخلاق ، تمایل ، تقوا
حتی یک لغت منفی در اسلام در باره برده داری نمیتوان یافت.
محمد تنها پیغمبری است که شخصأ برده داشته است. و همواره برده بهمراه خود میبرده

برده داری بعنوان روشی بود برای اینکه کافر را مسلمان کند. این نوعی تقوا محسوب میشود که برده ای را آزاد کنند در حالیکه محمد تنها بردگانی را که به اسلام آمده بودند آزاد میکرد. اگر یک برده کافر اسلام نمی آورد، منتظر میشدند که فرزندانش اسلام بیاورند. بدین ترتیب در دراز مدت همه آنها دین اسلام را می پذیرفتند. این یکی از دلایلی بود که اسلام برده داری را به چشم مثبت می نگریست.

البته دلیل دیگری هم هست که اسلام برده داری را چنان مفید می داند و آن پول است.

محمد و سایر رزمندگان اسلامی توانستند ثروت زیادی از برده گرفتن کافران بیاندوزند. و محمد این پولها را برای جنگهای بیشتری بکار برد. این برده داری و جنگ بود که به گسترش اسلام کمک کرد.

همه اخلاقیات اسلامی از زندگی محمد الگو گرفته است ، زیرا اسلام محمد را موجودی کامل میداند. هر چه او گفت یا انجام داد نمایانگر کارهائی است که مجاز است یا مفید.

محمد مکررأ فتوا بر سکس اجباری ( تجاوز به عنف ) با زنان کافر پس از اینکه آنان را دستگیر کردند میدهد. حدیث های موجود به وضوح گزارش میدهند که محمد شخصأ اولین حق را برای انتخاب این زنان داشته است. او اولین کسی بود که عبای خود را بر روی زنی که می پسندید می افکند و دیگران میدانستند که به این زن دیگر نظرنداشته باشند زیرا متعلق به محمد است. لذا اگر محمد شخصأ در این تجاوزات شریک بود پس تجاوز نوعی تقوا است، نه گناه و خطا . بدین ترتیب بسیاری از زنان زیبا حتی وقتی اسلام آوردند توسط سپاه محمد مورد تجاوز قرار گرفتند. امروز بهمین دلیل است که زنان مسلمان مخصوصأ اگر زیبا باشند توسط ماموران وحشی حکومت اسلامی دستگیر شده و در بدو ورود به زندانها مورد تجاوز قرار میگیرند یا حتی قبل از اینکه معصومانه اعدام شوند به آنها با فتوای رهبر اسلامی تجاوز میشود در حالیکه مسلمان هستند اما با رژیم خونخوار مخالفند. این تجاوزات برای مطیع ساختن آنان بکار میرود.

وقتی مجمد قبیله غریزه را تخریب کرد، سر همه مردان بالغ جهود آن را برید، لذا شوهری بر جای نماند . سپس محمد اطفال آنان را به بردگی به رزمندگان اسلام بخشید که آنان را مسلمان کنند و زنان آنان را هم به بردگی فروخت.

داستانهای بجای مانده از آن زمان حکایت میکند که این زنان تقسیم به بردگان سکس و بردگان خانگی شدند.
در یک داستان آمده است که یک رزمنده اسلام سعی میکند زنی را به قیمت گرانی بفروشد و خریدار او میگوید که سینه هایش صاف و دهانش سرد است و لذا قیمتی نیست و تنها بدرد کارهای خانه داری میخورد نه اطاق خواب.

مسلمانان سعی داشتند از باردار شدن زنان برده کافر جلوگیری کنند. دلیل آن مشخصأ تجارت بود زیرا چنین زنی ارزش کمتری داشت.

روش اسلامی بر اینست که زنان کافر برای فاحشگی نباید بکار روند تنها برای لذت اربابان خویش.

وقتی محمد به قبیله یهودی خیبر حمله کرد مقدمات روانی زیادی تهیه دید. بردگی سکسی دارای یک سری کامل از قوانین شد. مسلمانان نباید به زنان باردار یا قاعده تجاوز کنند تا وقتی که آنان فارغ شده یا دوران تقاعد خود را سپری کنند. در خیبر خدای محمد الله اعلام داشت که تجاوز حتی به زنان شوهر دار مجاز است.

در جنگ خیبر محمد فقط اندکی از جهودان را کشت و بقیه مردان و زنان را به بردگی گرفت زیرا به آنها برای کار در زمین بعنوان دییمی احتیاج داشت

( دییمی های اصلی مانند بردگان بودند و هیچ نوع حق و حقوقی نداشتند . امروزه دییمی ها کافران نادان و بی اطلاع هستند که برای خطاها و خشونت های اسلامی عذر و بهانه درست میکنند )

از آنجا که اسلام مردان را برای کار لازم داشت شوهران زنده بجای ماندند و بدین دلیل قران گفت که در این صورت حتی اگر شوهران دارند نگاه میکنند میتوان زنان آنان را مورد تجاوز قرار داد.

برده داری جهت منافع سکسی تنها از نظر لذت و سود مالی نبود بلکه تجاوز به زنان موجب تاکتیک قوی جنگی بود ، هم در آنموقع و هم امروزه . زنان مجبور به اطاعت از مردان مسلمان میشوند و شوهران آنان مورد تحقیر قرار میگیرند.

مردان تحقیر شده ، مردان ضعیفی هستند ، لذا هر چه بیشتر کافران مقاومت در برابر اسلام را از دست میدادند.

مدتهای زیاد زن مورد علاقه محمد یک زن مسیحی بود بنام ماری. یکی از زنان محمد (عایشه) او را در اطاق خواب خود در حال معاشقه غافلگیر کرد و رسوائی بزرگی برای محمد ببار آورد.

محمد به او قول داد که دیگر چنین کاری نکند و ماری را به خانه کوچک مخفی خود منتقل ساخت.

همه آنچه که تا بحال گفته شد تنها تاریخ نیست بلکه سنت است ( نمونه ای از الگوی کامل اعمال و اخلاق اسلامی است که در محمد یافت میشد).

بنا بر اجازه قران و تقویت آن توسط اعمال محمد اسلام تنها سیستم سیاسی است در جهان که اجازه تجاوز و جنگ را میدهد. تجاوز بعنوان عملی جنگی به نفع اسلام (جهاد) بکار میرود. بنا بر این منتظرید که چگونه این روش مفید واقع شود؟ یک مرد مسلمان با تجاوز به عنف به یک دختر کافر برای خود امتیاز بهشت رفتن تدارک می بیند. همه جهاد یا جنگ اسلامی از هر نقطه نظر که باشد بلیطی است برای رفتن به بهشت.

چندش آورترین جنبه اسلام در مورد تجاوز به کافران خود تجاوز نیست بلکه جواب یک کافر به این تجاوز است. کافر توسط نادیده گرفتن تجاوز دی.یمی میشود. از شما دعوت میکنم که حتی یک نفر را در دنیای اسلام نشان دهید که از تجاوز در کتابهای تاریخ اسلام چیزی نوشته باشد.

سخن از تجاوز اسلامی بیشتر بصورت تابو یا چیزی منع شده است . در رسانه های اسلامی این کلامی است ناگفتنی. و حتی تظاهر به عدم موجودیت آن میشود. در افسانه های رسانه ای حتی یونیکورن یا اسب بال دار موجودیت دارد اما تجاوز اسلامی اعلام موجودیتش ممنوع است حتی بعنوان یک افسانه.

و به عنوان یک سخن جالب : زنان به اصطلاح فمنیست و خردمند ما مطلقأ و هوشمندانه ورشکسته اخلاق ریا کار خود هستند.


آنان خائنین فرهنگی و موجب شرمندگی و بی آبروئی ما هستند. در برابر شناعت و جنایت بر علیه زنان ساکت میمانند . و آنجا که از سخن گفتن در باره سنت اسلامی، تاریخ و تجاوزات اخیر به دختران و زنان و خواهران ما سر باز میزنند، باید به آنان لقب اعظم دییمی داد.

و دلار های مالیاتی ما این اعمال شیطانی را در دانشگاههای دولتی حمایت میکند

= دییمی ) DHIMMI (

IRAN'S POPULARITY IN IRAQ PLUMMETING

While America's left wing driven NIE openly lies about Iran's nuclear activity assessment, joining in with IAEA's Arab Al-Baredai, in running interference for the Islamic Regime, the Iraqis increasingly want Iran out of their hair. Even Iraqi Shias are turning on Iran. Over 200 sheikhs of Iraqi tribes issued, on December 6, a communiqué condemning "the terrorist presence of the Iranian regime and of its collaborators in Iraq" and calling for Iran's embassy and consulates in Iraq to be shut down. Conversely, the leaders expressed support for the presence of the Iranian opposition organization Mojahideen-e-Khalq in Iraq, "as punishment for the Iranian regime that is exporting terrorism and radicalism to Iraq." The leaders also expressed support for a petition signed by over 300,000 Shi'ites in southern Iraq condemning Iranian intervention in Iraq and accusing the Iranian government of "fanning the flames of inter-ethnic violence that has caused the death of tens of thousands of Iraqis... and the uprooting of four million people."

THEN GOD CREATED WOMAN

No Comment Necessary!

THOUSANDS OF WORDS SAID IN CARTOON IMAGES

ISLAMIC ADAM & EVE

says it all

ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW SENTENCE FOR BEING RAPED

ISLAMIC SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL

NOW FOR REAL LIFE ISLAMIC IRAN IN PICTURES IN THE ARTICLE BELLOW.

THOUSANDS OF WORDS SAID IN PICTURES - ISLAMIC LAW IN IRAN

WANT TO FACE THIS SPECIALLY DESIGNED MACHETE WIELDING "POLICEMAN" OF THE ISLAMIC IRANIAN SUPPRESSION FORCES?

WHO ARE ORDERED TO MAIM AND KILL YOU BRUTALLY TO TERRORIZE YOU AND DISCOURAGE ANY PROTEST.

WONDER WHY PROTESTS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOM HAVE GROWN FEWER AND FEWER?

WOULD YOU APPROVE OF YOUR LOCAL OR NATIONAL POLICE BEING ARMED LIKE THIS?

WOULD YOU SUPPORT THEIR TOTAL IMMUNITY FROM BEING HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR CUTTING YOU TO PIECES? OR YOUR WIFE OR CHILDREN? ALL IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND THE SHARIA CODE OF BEHAVIOR?

OR THE SEXUAL RAPE OF MEN. WOMEN AND EVEN CHILDREN ARRESTED ALONG WITH PARENTS?

IRANIAN POLICE

POLICE ACTIVITY AGAINST PROTESTORS

REFUGE DENIED. WOMAN SEEKS PROTECTION FROM A GOVERNMENT AGENT BUT IS TOLD "DON'T TOUCH ME!" AS HE RECOILS.

WHAM!

THIS REPRESSION, TORTURE AND SAVAGE IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARIA LAW FINALLY DROVE THIS MAN, IN THE HOLY CITY OF GHOM, INTO THIS DEMENTED PROTEST OF HOW HE AND HIS FAMILY HAD BEEN TREATED BY THE ISLAMIC SUPPRESSION FORCES.

CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW HARD AND FAR YOU HAVE TO BE DRIVEN TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN AN ISLAMIC COUNTRY? KNOWING HOW YOU WILL TREATED LATER BUT BEYOND CARING?

WAKE UP AMERICA! WAKE UP THE WEST!

YOU ARE TARGETED TOO FOR SHARIA LAW.

JUST A MATTER OF TIME UNLESS YOU REACT AND PUT A STOP TO IT IN YOUR OWN COUNTRIES, STATES, CITIES, NEIGHBORHOODS.

LEARN ABOUT WMD EFFECTS ON OUR WORLD

Weapons of Mass Destruction and Alternative Futures Key Findings of the Report Among driving forces in the international security environment affecting the potential future use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) against the Unites States, those judged to be the most significant are the spread of radical Islam and the increase of globalization. Plausible events could lead to alternative futures in which radical Islam and globalization could be either high or low. The likelihood of the use of WMD would be highest in the Hidden Islam scenario and lowest in the Open Borders scenario. Each scenario has different opportunities, allies, threats and competitors. In all scenarios, there are indicators and signposts that occur in the years prior to their full development that the intelligence community will be tasked to monitor and identify.

DOWNLOAD THE REPORT

BEST FIRST DANCE AT WEDDING & SKELETON

Change of Pace for your Monday Morning

ISLAMIC AL-QAEDA INSTRUCTING PRISON INMATES

If you still cannot envisage the extent and danger of the political Islamic jihad as portrayed in the article below this one, think about this "invisible" incursion into our society. Entering through an already anti-social and anti-authority population - though not all are vulnerable to participating or converting to Islam. But has a built in, fragmented though it may be, organization through the "gang" or mosque afiliations. Now that we are aware of this, what are we doing about it? Are we continuing to be "dhimmis"? (Read IGNORANCE & DENIAL OF ISLAM click here if you are not sure what this means). If it's happening in Australia do we really think that we, in the USA, the main "enemy" of Islamic jihad are immune? That this is not happening here, too? When our CIA gets it right and sounds a warning, do we do something about it? Do we form our own Security Threat Group Intervention Program? Or do the perfect Dhimmis - our ACLU and liberal Democrat bleeding hearts impede our efforts instead? Inmates studying al-Qaeda manual Heath Gilmore December 2, 2007 ISLAMIC extremists are using an al-Qaeda training manual to give theminstructions for taking over the state’s toughest jails, prisonauthorities have alleged. Up to 40 inmates had established an internal organisational structureto maintain morale, resist interrogation and recruit members to Islam. The prisoners had set up leadership groups in several maximum-securityjails, with their activities governed by the code outlined in theal-Qaeda manual for incarcerated followers. A number of Corrective Services staff have been targeted, some withviolent threats by inmate groups. Other staff have been singled outfor conversion to Islam. NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said an undisclosed number ofinmates had been transferred to other jails in an attempt to disruptthe leadership groups. Mr Hatzistergos said he was extremely concerned about the broader attempts to infiltrate the jail system, which were uncovered after sweeping changes to prison regulations allowed 24-hour monitoring of Muslim inmates. The latest crackdown followed the disclosure this year that a third ofthe state’s most dangerous criminals held in the highest-security jail in Australia, the Super Max facility inside Goulburn jail, were Muslim fundamentalists or converts to Islam. “The insidious nature of these activities remind us we have to beconstantly vigilant to these types of threats for the security of ourcorrectional system,” Mr Hatzistergos said. NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Ron Woodham said internationalprison authorities had alerted Australian authorities to the existenceof the manual three months ago. Corrective Services staff had since uncovered patterns of behaviouramong inmates consistent with instructions in the manual, including hunger strikes, group protests and claims of mistreatment, he said. “There were hunger strikes and organised complaints about their treatment,” he said. “We have detected the leadership in groups across our maximum security jails [and] have moved in to segregate them and split them up. “There is nothing wrong with conversion to Islam for the right reasons, but we believe there has been conversion taking place for the wrong reasons.” The Security Threat Group Intervention Program, established in 2003 to stop ethnic and other criminal gangs exerting control within NSW jails, is now being used to identify and relocate the ringleaders who are applying the code outlined in the al-Qaeda manual, to counter the growing threat of terrorism.Terrorist hierarchy - The al-Qaeda training manual was first obtained by the CIA in 1996. - It suggests a 10-position leadership structure for members held inprison. - The structure includes: “barracks chief and deputies”, “greeters to meet and instruct new arrivals”, “welfare attendants" to organise equitable distribution of goods from families and aid organisations” and “clergy”, presumably to attend to spiritual needs as well as to recruit new adherents to their faith, according to the CIA report.

MUST READ & SEE ARTICLE!! Click on link

DENIAL OF DANGER FROM A KNIFE AND ISLAM click here

TERROR NEWS NOV 30 - ROUNDUP

"Straight Vermonter" takes a lot of trouble gathering this together and I am putting it up on the Main Page for two reasons: 1. To draw attention to his fine efforts, and 2. Because of not posting for some days, I have lots more Conflict and Terror for the Terror News Page courtesy of Terrorism Research Center, Inc. Other articles already on hand for posting may have to wait for the weekend as a friend needs me to edit/polish a religious comparison article she has to present tommorrow. Enjoy this and also the very long look at Conflict and Terror (three days worth) on the Terror News Page. Click on each individual link to read the full articles. Iraq: Unit battled to take over ‘al-Qaida’s Castle’ US Identifies 3 al-Qaeda Leaders Killed Dragoons catch suspect linked to abductions of US soldiers Talks Are Set on Ending Battle of Iraq Iraqi forces now leading most operations Troops Detain Dozens, Kill Terrorist Suspect Cell Leader Captured in Al Saker Hawr Rajab Concerned Local Citizens turn in explosives cache to new unit EOD team identifies house-borne IED, F-16 destroys it (Maderiyah) Twelve detained as Coalition forces target al-Qaeda terrorist operations Iraqi Special Operations Forces, U.S. Special Forces disrupt Baghdad terrorist cell Iraqi Security Forces, U.S. Special Forces detain terrorist cell leader, two others in separate oper Iraqi Police find massive weapons cache in southern Ninevah Operation Varsity March leads to capture of suspect (Sayafiyah) Iraqi Security Forces, U.S. Special Forces detain 13 in separate operations (Balad) Concerned citizen’s tip leads to large cache find in Adhamiyah Ten detained as Coalition forces disrupt al-Qaeda in Iraq operations (Tigris River Valley) Iraqi Security Forces, U.S. Special Forces detain 3, uncover 18 IEDs in separate operations Troops kill al-Qaida militants (Baiji) Afghanistan / Pakistan: Pakistan army 'retakes key peak' in Swat Militants vacate trenches in several areas of Swat (50 Taliban killed) Pakistani troops regain control of town in Swat Afghan Commandos Detain Several Taliban Extremists Yorkshire soldiers help seize million dollar drugs haul in Afghanistan Taliban weapons smuggling operations disrupted Elite Afghan force continues to neutralize Taliban insurgents Afghan citizens continue to rid their villages of Taliban insurgents ANSF seize ammunition cache The West: Judge sentences Somali immigrant in shopping mall terror plot (Ohio) Testimony Ends in Miami Terrorism Case (Liberty City Seven) Doctor sentenced in NY terrorism case Slovak police seize 'enriched uranium' in raid British man fails to block extradition to US in terror case Israel / Levant: Jordan sentences al-Qaida militant to 10 years in slaying of US diplomat 2 Hamas militants killed in IDF strike At least 60 hurt in Fatah-Hamas clashes Turkey detains four PKK fundraisers India / Pakistan: Wanted Hizbul militant killed in Kashmir gunfight Two militants shot dead in J&K LeT militants killed in Gandoh, another flees LeT militant killed in Mahore Saudi Peninsula Saudi Arabia Arrests 208 in Antiterrorism Sweep New Generation of al-Qaeda on Trial in Yemen The Caucasus: High-Ranking Terrorist Killed in Chechnya

YOU WILL NOT LIKE LOSING - Are You Supporting Winning?

Alan Note: If a new post does not appear on the Home Page, do check the other pages as quite often new material appears there without mention or link on the main page. For instance: Bilingual Russian & English on the Armenian Question - click on link below BILINGUAL ARMENIAN QUESTION click here Some really good, incisive articles and analyses coming over the next couple of days. Time has not allowed them to already go up.

'You ain't gonna like losing.' Author unknown (Mr./Ms. Anonymous writes so much good stuff) -

President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq .

Bush's mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his father fought for in WW2. It is not. Back then, they had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was steeled by the hardship of that depression, but they still believed fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their leaders, so it was the people's duty to back those leaders. Therefore, when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind, and stuck with their leaders, whether they had voted for them or not or whether the war was going badly or not. And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great as it is today.

Often there were more casualties in one day in WW2 than we have had in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck with the President because it was their patriotic duty.

Americans put aside their differences in WW2 and worked together to win that war. Everyone from every strata of society, from young to old pitched in.

Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war bonds to help the effort. Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition trying their best to join the military.

Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap, to butter was imposed, yet there was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President.

Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile countries and complain to them about our President.

Instead, they made upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops' morale. And a bunch even enlisted! And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a Pledge of Allegiance, and with prayers for our country and our troops! Back then, no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage.

No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing to catch spies. A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by being forced to wear women's underwear, or subjected to interrogation by a woman, or being scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning. There were a lot of things different back then.

We were not subjected to a constant bombardment of pornography, perversion and promiscuity in movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crackheads, dope pushers and armed gangs roaming our streets. No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism.

He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers.

He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorra and the land of Oz.

We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices. We are in great danger.

The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe that it is okay, even their duty, to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam.

It has been estimated that about one-third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists cause...Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits. So...we either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like losing. America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.

EIGHTH WONDER OF THE WORLD - Long Held Secret

CLICK ON TITLE/SUBJECT TO GO TO ARTICLE The Italian government orignally decided to confiscate more than 16-years of toil and artistry when they discovered the easily qualifying 8th Wonder in terms of human artistry! They have since granted retroactive planning permission for the Temples of Damanhur. Go to article to view stunning photos of man's effort and creativity.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING

HEALTH CARE & video of .......

READ ARTICLE, THEN CLICK ON TITLE TO GO TO THE VIDEO OR USE LINK AT END OF ARTICLE FOR SEQUEL VIDEO Japanese doctor says, "Medicine in my country is so advanced that we can take a kidney out of one man, put it in another, and have him out looking for work in six weeks." A German doctor says, "That is nothing. We can take a lung out of one person, put it in another, and have him out looking for work in four weeks." A British doctor says, "In my country medicine is so advanced that we can take half a heart out of one person, put it in another, and have both of them out looking for work in two weeks." The American doctor, not to be outdone, interjected, "You guys are way behind. We are about to take a woman with no brains, put her in the White House, and then half the country will be out looking for work." http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/3122903