Losing readers left, right and center, and having to layoff some 200 employees, the New York Times appears to be angling to increase a special readership - Terrorists and Anti-America haters.
As you can read when you go to the link at the end, they refused to protect the name of a key CIA operative.
Do terrorists need spies when they have the likes of the New York Times to infiltrate our intelligence circles and spread our secret operations?
For those not old enough to remember, Hitler's Germans would shoot and kill defenceless paratroopers as they floated down.
AND attacked Jews as far back as 1943 FOR RESISTING HITLER
Does this clarify why they are losing readership?
Treacherous New York Times - click here to read Michelle Malkin's current take on this.
2 comments:
Sir if you are truly Anti Evil Islam and Mullahs then please sign this:
"URGENT RELEASE OF FROOD FOULADVAND"
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/FroodFouladvand?e
To Evilislam
1. Antimullah does not support petitions as a general rule.
2. We have mixed/conflicting feelings about Forood Fouladvand.
As a courtesy we have left your comment in place because you have an anti-EVILislam mindset and we tend to respect that.
Please leave Dr. Fouladvand out of our activity and comments.
Thanks for your many good comments in the past and in the future.
Post a Comment