Saturday, March 21, 2009


Obama: the only US president to be sued 16.03.2009 Source: Pravda.Ru URL: By Mark S. McGrew On February 9, 2009, a New Jersey attorney, Mr. Mario Apuzzo, filed a lawsuit on behalf of Plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James LeNormand and Donald H. Nelson, Jr. The lawsuit, Civil Action Number. 1:09 –cv-00253 was filed in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. You can see the actual case filing at Mr. Apuzzo’s website. The defendants in this case are: Barrack Hussein Obama II, and Individually, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, United States of America, The United States Congress, The United States Senate, The United States House of Representatives, Richard B. Cheney (President of the US Senate, Presiding Officer of Joint Session of Congress, Vice President of the United States and Individually), Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House and Individually). All of the defendants have been served with a copy of the complaint and have 60 days to respond to the complaint. Will they stand up like honest citizens and answer the complaint, or will they hide behind high priced lawyers like Obama has been doing? Basically, the lawsuit says there is no verifiable proof that Obama is an American citizen and is therefore ineligible to be the President of the United States. It also points out that the United States Code of Federal Regulations was violated by the defendants, during the course of counting Electoral votes, by not asking any members of Congress if they objected to the counts. A normal counting of the votes takes approximately 2 hours. Obama’s took 36 minutes and it is on record that there was no call for any objections. This lawsuit is important because, the cold hard fact of life is that if Obama is not qualified or eligible to be the President of the United States of America, every action Obama takes is fraudulent. Any Treaty, Executive Order, Agreements, and/or Laws signed by him are not valid and can be rescinded, reneged on or totally ignored by any Nation on Earth, including future American administrations, now and into the distant future. Any trade agreements between Nations and Corporations can be denied or rescinded. By the very nature of Obama’s citizenship being questioned, it places the liberty of all Americans in jeopardy. Obama himself, can end all lawsuits, quiet all questions, stop all Internet chatter about his citizenship by simply producing a legitimate Birth Certificate. What reason could he have for employing legal firms to obstruct anyone from seeing where he was born? An ineligible President makes the entire World a very dangerous place and places every Nation in an unprecedented, unstable position in regards to dealing with America. By taking his stance Mario Apuzzo and his Plaintiffs are protecting the World in their efforts to protect Americans. If American politicians refuse to follow the one important rule of the US Constitution in choosing a President, the most important position in America, they can and will ignore any part of the Constitution and any law as it fits their needs. This is described as “Anarchy”. Not a single World leader can trust our politicians or our agreements. Mario Apuzzo and his four Plaintiffs are not alone in their quest to find out if Obama is an American citizen. Obama has used three law firms to keep his birth place secret. There is no proof that he was born in America. Obama steadfastly refuses to provide any proof that he is an American citizen. Most of us have heard of his “Certification of Live Birth” in Hawaii. Any person born in any location on Earth can have the State of Hawaii give them a “Certification of Live Birth”. This document has a space on it asking what country the applicant was born in. Hawaii has two birth documents. 1. A “Certification” which is given to anyone who asks for it, regardless of what country they were born in. 2. A “Certificate” which is only given to people born in Hawaii. Obama and the major news companies in America proudly show an ignorant populace the “Certification”. It proves only that a human being was born somewhere on this particular Planet. Two of the best web sites to keep up to date on the many lawsuits are: and Another attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz of California, has been tenacious in trying to force Obama to prove he is an American. Dr. Taitz has a website that will keep you up to date on her activities. One of the problems these lawsuits face is the simple task of getting a Judge to at least consider the facts presented. Case after case has been thrown out by various Judges, loosely based on the incredibly profound ruling of “It’s none of your business who is President, so shut up.” Dr. Orly Taitz has two lawsuits sitting in the US Supreme Court. There have been questions as to whether the US Supreme Court Justices have even been made aware of her filings in their Court. It is very possible that not one of the nine Justices knows about the controversy regarding an illegal alien pretending to be our President while he his partying his butt off in the White House. When US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was performing a book signing for his new book, Dr. Taitz bought two copies, stood in line with everyone else and when it was her turn to have her book signed, she introduced herself, explained a bit about the cases and gave him a copy of the 130 page dossier/letter sent to Eric Holder, US Attorney General and others asking them to investigate Obama for: Cyberspace crimes, impersonation of a military officer; identity theft of U.S. Army Officer Scott Easterling, libel, defamation of character, intimidation, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, voter fraud, using cyberspace for voter fraud, fraud, forgery, and other related crimes. Justice Scalia appeared not to be aware of the lawsuits filed in his Court, which is not unusual, as they receive thousands of cases each year and only review a small number of them. Justice Scalia said that he would look into the matter and he would read her dossier. She also sent copies of that dossier to: Steven Whitlock-Director of Whistle Blower Office-IRS, Director of FBI-Robert Mueller, Congressional Judiciary Committee, Senatorial Judiciary Committee, Illinois Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, Tennessee Attorney General, California Attorney General. Electronic copies were sent to: US Senate, US Congress, Various State Governors and to Domestic and International Major Media. America’s major media has been advised many times of the question of Obama’s birth and all they respond with is the phony “Certification of Live Birth”. Eventually a lawsuit may be filed against the major media owners who have helped to perpetrate this ongoing fraud. This 130 page dossier contained numerous charges including: a list of 100 addresses for Barack Obama with numerous different social security numbers, issued all over the country and attached to those addresses. It showed the address Obama used in Somerville, Massachusetts, attached to the Social Security number of a man who is 118 years old. It showed evidence of Obama committing perjury, lying under oath. It had his school registration from Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, religion Muslim. There was a page of Obama’s registration to become an attorney and officer of the court in Illinois, where he stated under oath that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and he had no other prior names, which is on record as being untrue. It contained a report from a federal agent, Steven Coffman, stating that there are numerous signs of forgery in his Selective Service Certificate. It contained a letter from a renowned expert, Sandra Line, stating that there are signs of forgery in Obama’s short version Certification of Live Birth, and that the original birth certificate needs to be reviewed in order to ascertain his status. It contained 130 current job positions for Barry Obama, Barack H. Obama and Michelle Obama, which were obtained from Intellius It stated that none of them were reported on Obama’s tax returns. This dossier can be found here. Most recently, of note, is a grueling 3am trip made by Dr. Orly Taitz to attend a lecture being given by the US Supreme Court’s Chief Justice John Roberts. She traveled by car, plane and car again from her office in California to a small town in Idaho, carrying two suitcases of documents. Her goal was to personally deliver, directly into the hands of Chief Justice Roberts these historic documents. Many of the attorney’s making lawsuits would never consider breeching protocol by bypassing “the system” and going straight to the target. But Orly Taitz did it and she was successful. She delivered to the Chief Justice of The United States Supreme Court: 1. Motion for reconsideration of Lightfoot v Bowen with all the supplemental briefs. 2. Quo Warranto Easterling et al v Obama et al. 3. 3300 pages with 325,000 names of people that signed a WorldNetDaily petition, demanding that the Supreme Court hear Obama elligibility cases. 4. Copy of the 130 page dossier and all the other documents sent to US Attorney General Eric Holder, and others. There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho. Roughly 5,000 people on all the campuses had an opportunity to hear what Dr. Taitz had to say. Chief Justice Roberts stated to her, “I will read your documents, I will review them. Give them to my Secret Service Agent and I will review them.” His Secret Service Agent approached her and told Dr. Taitz, “Give me all the documents, I promise you Justice Roberts will get them.” She had a full suitcase of documents. The agent went to look for a box, and after he found a large box to fit all the documents, he showed her his badge and introduced himself as Gilbert Shaw, Secret Service Agent assigned to the security of Chief Justice Roberts. Dr. Taitz made her presentation in front of 800 people in the audience, including university officials, the president of the Idaho State Bar and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Idaho, and in front of all them, Chief Justice promised to read her papers. Attorneys Mario Apuzzo, Dr. Orly Taitz and Phillip Berg are asking various Courts for “Quo Warranto”. The legal phrase Quo Warranto essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama is using to act as President. An online constitutional resource says Quo Warranto “affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.” The Obama campaign is the greatest theft of a great Nation, America. It is the greatest fraud in American history. He is the greatest con man in American history. The major media in America is a willing participant in this fraud. American politicians are either willingly participating or ignoring the truth in front of their noses. The American election system is being made a mockery of to the World. The American Constitution is being torn up. Americans are being divided by Obama, intentionally. Obama has publicly stated his intention to commit Crimes Against Humanity by forcing Americans to perform free labor for the government. Obama is the only United States President in history to be sued. And he has not one lawsuit challenging his eligibility, but approximately 40 lawsuits in State and Federal Courts all across America, from Delaware to Hawaii. This game being played has very high stakes. If a new administration, a constitutional administration, an American administration takes power; everyone who aided and abetted Obama may be prosecuted for Treason and hanged by the neck until dead. Alberto Gonzales, past US Attorney General, under President George W. Bush Jr., when he gave his opinion that torture was permissible, warned the President that a future administration may prosecute him, regardless of the Gonzales opinion. In a realm where there is no right or wrong, only force, by whoever holds that power, is what determines who lives and who dies. The United States Constitution allows us to avoid that kind of behavior, but with the current power denying, disobeying, ignoring and violating that Constitution, they are exposing themselves, their families and certain of their international friends, to death by hanging. It truly is the time for all good men to come to the aid of America. All Americans need to forget their differences and unite in stopping Obama’s actions of destroying this country. Go to Dr. Orly Taitz’s website. She will tell you what to do and how to do it. There are form letters and addresses of the key people to send them to. This is not difficult to make your voice heard. If you do not join in saving this country, you are contributing to our downfall. People from other Nations also, should join this fight. If America fails, your country will suffer. We are asking World leaders and the citizens of all countries to join in and help us to remove the un-constitutional administration of Obama. The American people are not bad. We’re just like people anywhere, wanting the same things in life. The crimes of America are committed by officials who refuse to obey our Constitution. An interesting aspect of this entire affair is that this article and previous ones that I have written are first published in Russia’s Pravda.Ru service. Dr. Orly Taitz, the attorney making the most headway in the American Courts is a Russian immigrant to America. And the small town in Idaho, where she was finally able to present her case to the highest Justice of the highest court in America, is named “Moscow”. Mark S. McGrew can be reached at
ALSO MUST READ BORN IN THE USA? Man critical of Obama case judge visited by marshals' I told your Gestapo goons we had nothing to talk about' Posted: March 21, 200912:15 am Eastern By Bob Unruh© 2009 WorldNetDaily A Washington, D.C., man who believes Barack Obama probably isn't eligible to be president – and colorfully stated as much to a federal judge who dismissed a case challenging Obama's residency in the White House – says he got a visit from U.S. marshals for his exercise of free speech.

James Robertson

Jesse Merrell told WND he was reacting to Judge James Robertson's decision to throw out a case challenging Obama's eligibility because the issue had been thoroughly "twittered." Merrell sarcastically gave the judge a "good-for-you." "How dare people use a flimsy thing like the Constitution to darken your sanctimonious door!" he wrote to the judge. "The insane idea that a blue-gum baboon slashing our Constitution has to prove U.S. citizenship – as our silly old Constitution demands – is too absurd to consider in the sacred chambers of the tiny tin gods of the Potomac, adorning the royal purple and sipping Jim Jones Kool-Aid. "Thanks to smug, slimy shysters like you, Obama gets a free ride – snootily stomping on our foolish Constitution, which supercilious idiots like you have long ago shredded for their own stupid opinions!" Merrell continued in the letter, a copy of which he provided to WND. He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report. A short time later, he said he found two U.S. marshals on his doorstep. "After reading your story about Federal Judge James Robertson dismissing a suit challenging Obama's natural born citizenship, and suggesting sanctions, I wrote him a very critical letter," Merrell told WND. "Two U.S. marshals came to visit me, making threats to silence me. "I told them unless the First Amendment had been repealed, or they had a warrant for my arrest, we had nothing to discuss," he continued. "But they insisted on coming in, and making further threats. "I responded with another letter, with firm language, but nothing I haven't used for 30 years, and quoting Thomas Jefferson's warning to bind judges with the 'chains of the Constitution' to prevent mischief." WND called the U.S. marshals service for comment, but there was no comment on the specific case. A WND message left for one of the officers involved also was not returned. A media office spokeswoman who took the message did confirm that "anyone who may write a letter referencing a judge or put something in a letter causing the marshals to be concerned about the well-being of a judge, they would look into it." Merrell told WND his particular dislike of "government tyranny" has existed "since my fourth-great-grandfather, Captain Benjamin Merrell, was hanged – hanged, drawn and quartered – by the British Royal Governor of North Carolina in 1771 for protesting high and unjust taxes." Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 335,000 others and sign up now! In his follow up letter to the judge, Merrell's language was a little more salty. "I told your Gestapo goons, of course, that unless the First Amendment had been repealed, or they were there to arrest me, that we had nothing to talk about.," Merrell's letter said ."One of your Brown-Shirt Nazi bullies, however, could not resist threatening me with some obscure law – one he didn't know where it was, or when it was created – which he said made it a crime to say something that caused a federal judge 'emotional distress.' "Emotional distress? What unbelievably unadulterated horses---!" Merrell wrote. "What about the repulsive, stomach-turning 'emotional distress' you black-robed baboons speciously dish out to the American people daily – haughtily spitting on our precious Constitution with your nauseating, decency-stomping, judicial-jack--- slobber! "If it is illegal for a Constitution-loving citizen to chastise a Constitution-scorning judge, who has spitefully spat on America's consecrated moral bedrock, then the slimy, steel-laden tentacles of unspeakable tyranny are already wrapped tightly around helpless citizens – awaiting the final hideous strangulation. "But not as long as one end of my red-blooded tongue is loose!" Merrell's letter said. He put the challenge directly to the judge: "The Constitution clearly states, with no possible ambiguity – in Article 2, Section 1 – that 'No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President,'" he wrote. "America is going down the drain – economically and Constitutionally, with terrorists and illegal aliens pouring across our borders like invading armies practically unopposed – but our insufferable, over-bloated, dictatorial government, while turning a blind eye to all that, has time and money to send two high-paid federal marshals – probably $130,000.00 each – to harass a citizen daring to exercise his precious First Amendment rights, which you want to destroy," he wrote. "When you solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution – then loathsomely lacerate and despicably desecrate that hallowed document – perhaps you should fear for your safety, for you have stopped being a dutiful servant of the people, and started arrogating unto yourself the venomous trappings of their tyrannical slave-master," he wrote. "Oh, and my ancestor, Captain Benjamin Merrell, wasn't just hanged – but hanged, drawn and quartered: which means he was hanged, but taken down while yet alive, his abdomen violently sliced open and his entrails cruelly cut out and brutally thrown in his face and set afire...and then his body barbarically slashed into four quarters," Merrell wrote. "So, naturally, I'm more than a little suspicious of dictatorial power such as you brandish. And I'm not alone." WND reported a challenge to the judge from the lawyer handling the case. Robertson threatened attorney John D. Hemenway with sanctions for representing client Gregory S. Hollister. Hollister is a retired military officer subject to being recalled who is demanding to know Obama's eligibility to discern whether any orders from the president would be legal. Robertson dismissed the case, ridiculing questions of eligibility as having already been "blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged." Hollister is represented by Philadelphia lawyer Philip Berg, who has brought several motions on the eligibility dispute to the U.S. Supreme Court that have been ignored. Hemenway acted as local counsel in filing the action on behalf of Hollister. Robertson wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven – to the colonel's satisfaction – that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president. "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court," Robertson wrote. Hemenway has responded with a suggestion that if the judge wants to pursue sanctions, the attorney then would seek a discovery hearing to demand the president's original birth certificate as court procedures would allow. The clients concerns also are valid, he wrote. "These are not frivolous matters, as the learned Judge Robertson has suggested. Possible illegal orders are a matter of great concern to officers in the armed forces. … The legality of orders in and out of combat is of paramount importance," he wrote. The lawyer also criticized the judge for citing hearsay in his court opinion. "It is not helpful for a United States district judge to endorse obfuscation when a constitutional issue is involved. Under these circumstances, to threaten sanctions against an attorney who, in good faith assisted in the filing of a lawsuit involving issues none of the many judges and attorneys from coast to coast have found 'frivolous' is to employ the Rule 11 as a device to deprive the undersigned attorney of his civil rights and the right to due process. Without even a hearing or access to discovery being granted to defend against the charges, such a sanction would be a veritable lynching," Hemenway challenged. "If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past," he said. "The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said. WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Some of the lawsuits question whether Obama was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time. Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born. Further complicating the issue are the reports he was adopted by an Indonesia man during his childhood and moved to Indonesia and attended school there. There also are questions on what nation's passport he traveled to Pakistan. Lawyers and plaintiffs in a multitude of lawsuits also have asked why, if a birth certificate actually reflects that Obama was born in Hawaii, has he spent sums estimated by observers of up to $1 million hiring various law firms to keep concealed his birth certificate, his college records and other documentation. John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, told WND a demand for verification of Obama's eligibility appears to be legitimate. Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that "he does not want the public to know."

1 comment:

hiddenfaces7 said...

This is just one more distraction Obama and his administration has left for us to ponder. How simple it would be for this to be put to rest, but Obama is so full of himself that he keeps the mystery flowing. Besides if he was found to be ineligible the civil uprise would be much more than we could all imagine. I still believe the truth shall set us free!