http://terrornewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/04/law-of-unintended-consequences.html
WAKE UP AMERICA - WHILE YOU STILL CAN
Showing posts with label AntiMullah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AntiMullah. Show all posts
Monday, April 18, 2011
Friday, March 18, 2011
Saturday, March 05, 2011
BATTLE OF BRITAIN AND MALMOE
Islam is more than a religion or even a cult, it is a totalitarian system that rules by fear and violence.
This fight with Islam is not about land, Islam does not co-exist, it does not assimilate into the society in which it lives, it’s mission is to conquer and rule completely, until it makes the whole world muslim. When muslims hold the majority in any land, like the serpent it rises up and strikes.
Another non-Muslim is on trial for “offending” Muslims. The following poster (SEE LINK BELOW) was distributed by a Swedish politician . So far a jury found him not guilty.
http://focusuk.wordpress.com/2010/04/23/malmo-group-gives-islam-a-taste-of-its-own-medicine/
Friday, March 04, 2011
OBUMMER! ABSOLUTE PROOF OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS BOGUS
MUST READ!
Pretty simple (precise wording is important):
The procedure is that paperwork is given to a Registrar.
The Registrar gives the paperwork to the State Registar.
The State Registrar certifies the paperwork and, in accordance with the state laws, issues a birth certificate.
Fukino said that the paperwork had been filled out in accordance with the "proper procedures". THAT'S significant.
She told us (before the election) that Obama's request never got beyond the initial step in the process.
Fukino also said that the paperwork was in the possession of the Registrar. THAT'S significant.
She just told us that the paperwork never passed on to the State Registrar.
The Governor of Hawaii looked for a BC that had been issued by the state. He never found one. Because the State Registrar never certified the paperwork.
No birth certificate. The Hawaiian officials have been trying to tell us this for over two years, but we haven't heard them.
http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/
The Truth About Barack Obama's BIRTH CERTIFICATE -
Absolute proof it is bogus just like the potus HIMSELF.
March 4, 2011 | Miss Tickley
What follows is the story of a most amazing revelation. THE revelation.
Let’s Recount What We Know • We know the official hEALTH dEPARTMENT OF HAWAII (HDOH) seal does not appear on Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth.’
• We know that Hawaii confirmed that much through the press.
• We know that Obama has some kind of irregular “vital records” on file with the HDOH.
• We even know the Kapi’olani Letter is bogus and bears a bogus White House seal.
But, what follows tops it all. What follows should be the story of the century, in my opinion. What follows is the proof from the former Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, M.D, that Obama did NOT have a valid or official “original birth certificate” just days before the election.
And, it was right in front of our faces all along.
(Excerpt) Read more at http://www.obamasgarden.wordpress.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty simple (precise wording is important):
The procedure is that paperwork is given to a Registrar.
The Registrar gives the paperwork to the State Registar.
The State Registrar certifies the paperwork and, in accordance with the state laws, issues a birth certificate.
Fukino said that the paperwork had been filled out in accordance with the "proper procedures". THAT'S significant.
She told us (before the election) that Obama's request never got beyond the initial step in the process.
Fukino also said that the paperwork was in the possession of the Registrar. THAT'S significant.
She just told us that the paperwork never passed on to the State Registrar.
The Governor of Hawaii looked for a BC that had been issued by the state. He never found one. Because the State Registrar never certified the paperwork.
No birth certificate. The Hawaiian officials have been trying to tell us this for over two years, but we haven't heard them.
http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/
The Truth About Barack Obama's BIRTH CERTIFICATE -
Absolute proof it is bogus just like the potus HIMSELF.
March 4, 2011 | Miss Tickley
What follows is the story of a most amazing revelation. THE revelation.
Let’s Recount What We Know • We know the official hEALTH dEPARTMENT OF HAWAII (HDOH) seal does not appear on Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth.’
• We know that Hawaii confirmed that much through the press.
• We know that Obama has some kind of irregular “vital records” on file with the HDOH.
• We even know the Kapi’olani Letter is bogus and bears a bogus White House seal.
But, what follows tops it all. What follows should be the story of the century, in my opinion. What follows is the proof from the former Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, M.D, that Obama did NOT have a valid or official “original birth certificate” just days before the election.
And, it was right in front of our faces all along.
(Excerpt) Read more at http://www.obamasgarden.wordpress.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
TRUTH WELL SPOKEN AND THE THREAT TO AMERICA TO SUBMIT TO A CALIPHATE
QUOTE OF THE CENTURY, MAYBE EVEN THE MILLENNIUM
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America ..
Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
AND have AT THE SAME TIME invited islam to take over our Constitution with Shariah law!
“Our objective is to resume the Islamic way of life to which will fulfill the purpose of the aim. Our objective is to bring back the apparatus that was destroyed in 1924 i.e. Khilafah (Caliphate)”
Their website features a made-up photo of the BLACK FLAG of AL QAEDA with the words “No Deity but Allah and Muhammad Allah’s Messenger” flying over our White House.
They have invited this man, Anjem Choudary and two other well known radical Islamic figures, to travel from the UK to the United States to attend and speak at the protest planned this week.
[Undeniably Moslem (Marxist-Islamist), Oba-Hussein has obviously granted the visas to these radicals to come and subvert America]
They plan to call on Obama and US citizens to accept Islam and accept Sharia law.
Choudary told a British paper that the event is “a rally, a call for Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and establish the Islamic State in America.”
This is the same radical Islamist who once called America “the biggest criminals in the world” and once justified terrorist attacks by claiming that Muslims were innocent and non-Muslims were guilty, and that only the deaths of the innocent were wrong.
“At the end of the day, innocent people, when we say innocent people we mean Muslims ... if you are non-Muslim then you are guilty .... I must have hatred toward everything not-Islam.”- Anjem Choudary
Alan Note: BE WARNED!!!
It has been customary in Islam to officially suggest to a target people that they should convert to Islam and thus given the option to be spared before launching a lethal attack on them. Exactly as is happening here.
A few years ago Iranian President Ahmadi-Nejad also issued a similar warning without the clout of the rally behind it.
Once the "fair warning" is ignored Jihadis are free (duty bound) to kill us!
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America ..
Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
AND have AT THE SAME TIME invited islam to take over our Constitution with Shariah law!
SHARIAH RALLY THIS WEEKEND IN D.C
“Our objective is to resume the Islamic way of life to which will fulfill the purpose of the aim. Our objective is to bring back the apparatus that was destroyed in 1924 i.e. Khilafah (Caliphate)”
They have invited this man, Anjem Choudary and two other well known radical Islamic figures, to travel from the UK to the United States to attend and speak at the protest planned this week.
[Undeniably Moslem (Marxist-Islamist), Oba-Hussein has obviously granted the visas to these radicals to come and subvert America]
They plan to call on Obama and US citizens to accept Islam and accept Sharia law.
Choudary told a British paper that the event is “a rally, a call for Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and establish the Islamic State in America.”
This is the same radical Islamist who once called America “the biggest criminals in the world” and once justified terrorist attacks by claiming that Muslims were innocent and non-Muslims were guilty, and that only the deaths of the innocent were wrong.
“At the end of the day, innocent people, when we say innocent people we mean Muslims ... if you are non-Muslim then you are guilty .... I must have hatred toward everything not-Islam.”- Anjem Choudary
=====================================
Alan Note: BE WARNED!!!
It has been customary in Islam to officially suggest to a target people that they should convert to Islam and thus given the option to be spared before launching a lethal attack on them. Exactly as is happening here.
A few years ago Iranian President Ahmadi-Nejad also issued a similar warning without the clout of the rally behind it.
Once the "fair warning" is ignored Jihadis are free (duty bound) to kill us!
Saturday, February 26, 2011
PRINCESS AZADEH SHAFIGH PAHLAVI DIES
 |
| (top left) Azadeh - (middle top) Azadeh at a demonstration - (top right) Princess Ashraf with her three children, Shahram (Daddi), Shahriar (Poudzi) and Azadeh (Dodi) Next row Princess Ashraf (red dress) - Shahriar (in naval uniform) Next row Princess Ashraf with her father H.I.M. Reza Shah Kabir - Princess Ashraf with husband Ahmad Shafigh - Princess Ashraf with twin brother, the late Shahanshah Aryamehr. |
It is with great sadness that we share the the passing of Princess Azadeh (Dodi) Shafigh Pahlavi, daughter of H.I.H. Princess Ashraf Pahlavi, the late-Shah of Iran's twin sister, in a New York hospice, where she was being cared for her cancer.
I remember Dodi as the adventurous kid sister, full of humor and strong principles of a best friend, Prince Shahriar (Poudzi) Shafigh (Chafigh), who was assassinated in France by the Islamic regime to remove the most capable military officer likely to lead a military action against the regime.
Also remember her as an important activist for royalist, anti-Mullah efforts, including in London, where she crossed the English Channel to attend demonstrations against the Mullahs.
I remember her seated happily, at a vantage point to watch a royalist march, on top of the cabin of a large truck which had been rented to bring in the flags and banners for the 12,000 or so participants - which back in 1979 was a huge surge from the 27 people at the the first protest outside the occupied Iranian consulate. Of this number 25 were various organizers!
May she rest in eternal peace, as we feel the deep loss in our heavy hearts.
درگذشت ناگهانی شیر بانوی ایران والاگهر آزاده شفیق را به خاندان پهلوی بخصوص به شاهدخت اشرف پهلوی تسلیت عرض مینمائیم ما را هم در این سوگ شریک بدانید
ALSO IN MEMORIAM
Shahryar Shafiq was an Imperial Iranian Navy Captain, and the only member of the Pahlavi Dynasty who chose a military career. After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in February 1979, he was the only member of Dynasty to stay inside Iran and keep fighting against the Islamic revolutionaries, up to the point when he had to flee in a small boat from the Persian Gulf to Kuwait, under heavy fire.
In 1967, he married Maryam Eghbal, daughter of Manouchehr Eghbal, who was earlier married to one of his uncles, a half-brother of the Shah. They had two sons: HH Prince Nader Shafiq (born 15 March 1968) and HH Prince Dara Shafiq (born 1970).
After exile, he joined his family in Paris, France and began organizing a resistance movement inside Iran. He was assassinated in Paris on December 7, 1979, being shot twice in the head on the Rue Pergolese by a motorcyclist, the Prince reportedly drawn to the location by a former royal bodyguard, whom he trusted and who sold him out to the Mullahs.
Hat tip: Darius Kadivar
Friday, February 25, 2011
ATTACK DETAILS ON LARA LOGAN PERSONIFY STATE OF AFFAIRS TO EXPECT FROM LATEST WORLD CHANGES
WOMEN AND NON-MOSLEMS CAN EXPECT THIS FROM THE RISING CALIPHATE
Horrifying details of assault of South African (not American) reporter in Egypt
http://alanpetersworld.blogspot.com/2011/02/another-look-at-plague-oba-hussein-has.html
Why was she attacked this way?
http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/02/who-attacked-lara-logan-and-why.html
Horrifying details of assault of South African (not American) reporter in Egypt
http://alanpetersworld.blogspot.com/2011/02/another-look-at-plague-oba-hussein-has.html
Why was she attacked this way?
http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/02/who-attacked-lara-logan-and-why.html
Sunday, February 20, 2011
NOT ONLY DISSED BY THE BRITISH ROYALS BUT FACING THE SUPREMES (COURT)
INVITATION DEFINITELY NOT COMING TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
With Her Majesty’s reported orders about Michelle Obama, I cannot see the Obama clan risking the certain indignity of “arriving” uninvited.
(As some apparently think they might WANT to try)
Good and gracious manners still count for a lot in worldwide high society (little of it to still be found in the USA as we are not socially structured along the classical paths and our “high society” is not based on long standing family background, education, service to our country and cultural upbringing but our "nobility" or "upper class" is based on how much money they have in the bank or happen to be an unpolished, sometimes barely educated but popular movie, sports or music star.
(Or a lying, thuggish, CLUELESS Community Organizer (now millionaire), whom even Venezuela's thug, Hugo Chavez, verbally disrespects and Iran's Ahmadi-Nejad mocks in a speech as "not knowing his own name". Low life seems an appropriate characterization.
AND NOW THE SUPREME COURT IS TAKING ANOTHER LOOK AT HIS RIGHT TO OCCUPY THE WHITE HOUSE!
===============================================
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
BRITISH REPORTER REJOICES IN YOUNG PRINCE'S DEATH AND VILIFIES HIS FAMILY
http://alanpetersvideos.blogspot.com/2011/02/empress-farah-talks-to-barbara-walters.html
AND A RESPONSE FOR IRRESPONSIBLE REMARKS BY DAVID USBORNE:
Mr. David Usborne;
More than one month has gone since your news reporting/ article about the death of Prince
Ali Reza Pahlavi appeared in the Independent of January 6th 2011.
I have sent you two letters questioning the motive behind your hostile and inaccurate reporting.
I have pointed some of the factual errors in that article yet I have not received any reply
I have also made several telephone calls to the chief editor's office at the Independent newspaper, your foreign news desk and foreign editorial desk. I spoke several times to Miss. Enjoli Laston who asked me to write a letter and leave a contact telephone number. Miss. Laston promised that someone will either write or telephone me.
My second letter of 18th January 2011 was again addressed to you with copies to your editorial team requesting a reply either from yourself or from any member of your editorial team. On 26th of January, I decided to make my final telephone call before writing this letter. I was connected to someone with the name of Paul Peachey who twice put the phone down on me.
I than decided to contact Miss. Denise Thompson in the chief editor’s office. She promised to investigate why I have not received any reply.
Later that day on January 26th 2011, I got a short formal E-mail from Mr. Imogen Haddon but none of the points in my previous E-mails were addressed.
Your article which offended me and many more people started with vindictive and hatful remarks.
You even seemed to find the Late Prince Ali-Reza's neighbours as well as the neighbourhood which he lived in, the type of car he drove or the secured window shutters of his apartment as topics for your sarcastic insults.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/death-of-a-prince-latest-tragedy-to-hit-irans-dynasty-2177183.html
Here are the points in your news article which are misleading as well as misrepresentation of
the truth:
You wrote: "but to those who are within Iran's borders, the passing of the former Prince might
barely be worthy of comment". You than continue to say that: "If the family is honest with itself, it might want to consider this as possibility. The man who was once prince was driven to despair because he knew that he and all the Pahlavis remain despised in Iran today, not by the Ayatollahs who overthrow their father but by Iranians at large. If the Iranian exiles feel nostalgia for the days of the Shah, they are alone".
I don't know how you came to these inaccurate conclusions. That is if you did not make a
conscious decision to misinform your readers. The outpouring of your never ending animosity not only towards a young scholar who was only 12 years old when he left Iran and had nothing to do with the decision makings of the previous governments under his late father but indeed your hatred towards the dynasty that transformed Iranian's way of life is very apparent.
As for your comment that the death of the young prince was barely noticeable in Iran & whether
Pahlavis are despised by all in Iran or whether the Iranian exiles are alone in supporting the Pahlavis - the following are some facts that you should consider if you and your editorial team want to be honest with yourselves.
1: According to the Time Magazine of January 10th 2011, the death of the young prince was
received in Iran with great sadness. Al-Arabia reporting the reaction to the news from Iran by
saying that: 32 years after the fall of the Shah, the Pahlavi family remains as Iran's number one
family. Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times and others had similar stories all disagreeing
with your nonsense and lies.
On Monday January 24th VOA had a report on its web site confirming that inside Iran the people showed their sympathy in many different ways including throwing flowers in to the Caspian sea, where the ashes from the remains of the late prince (according to his will)
are to be scattered. We have confirmation from inside Iran.
2: For the past two weeks, the Iranian exile TV channels and radio stations received endless calls from all corners of Iran many to upset to speak. The Internet sites from both inside and outside Iran were full of sympathy messages for the Pahlavi family. Just one visit to YOU TUBE and the social networking sites such as Facebooks will reflects the mood of the Iranians.
The death of the young Prince resembled the tragic death of Neda in the hands of the Murderers goons of the British backed Ayatollahs on 20th of June 2009.
Visit the YOUTUBE links below on the reactions to Prince Ali-Reza Pahlavi's death in Iran
& else where. The links below will contradict your baseless claim that Pahlavis are despised by
all Iranians inside.
Memorial Leaflets Displayed In Public Places In The North Western City Of Rezaiyyeh
shortly after the death of the Prince was announced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P90qCqn_ZgI
Or click here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TEHRRAN#p/c/F31C81BD8BF4B304/18/P90qCqn_ZgI
Leaflets Displayed In Public Places in support of the Pahlavi kings as well as
the writings on walls: (Long Live the Shah, In Farsi: (Javid Shah), ). Friday February
11th 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=061JS7OVDso
Worldwide candle light vigil and memorial services for Prince Ali Reza Pahlavi:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TEHRRAN#p/c/F31C81BD8BF4B304
Barbara Walter's On the Effect On Iranians After Prince Ali Reza Committed Suicide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2se1tRZ9gDY&feature=feedu
Brave lady speaks, Another Example Of Public Support For The Shah. This clip is at
least two years old: (she bravely repeats "Javid Shah = Long Live the Shah"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPHW-ldSeqY
3: On the morning of January 6th, I had at least 12 telephone calls from inside Iran from distressed people who knew me, questioning me about the details of this tragic news and saying how fast the news was received inside Iran and how the mood of the people changed from shock to sorrow.
You wrote: "If the members of this diminishing family abhor what Iran is today-an unforgiving
Islamic theocracy built in part upon hatred it has bestowed on the US and its western allies - they know that it was they who ripened Iran for the event of 1979 that made it so. It was the megalomania of the Shah that enabled Ayatollah Khomeini to lead the revolution and mark the end of centuries of monarchic rule in Persia with celebration".
4: The abhorrence displayed in response to the crimes of the Mullahs by the Pahlavi family is shared by all Iranians but the excesses of this brutal regime cannot be blamed on the late modernizer Shah of Iran.
The Pahlavis have transformed Iran making that country the envy of the enemies such as you in Britain while bringing the respect and the admiration of the world at large.
People were going to Iran not leaving it yet since the Shah left, 7 million Iranians became refugees all over the world. We lived 52 years under the Pahlavis not knowing what war, sanctions, rationing, exile,, mass execution public stoning were.
Iran's currency was the 9th in the list of the world currencies. Iran under the late Shah had the 5th strongest army in the world but never saw a need to go to war with any country.
Iran was loaning to the World Bank and investing heavily in some of the world's best industries.
During the late Shah we had shortage of workers not work.
Iran Air was another success story surpassing the entire American and the European airlines. For at least ten years Iran Air was the second best airline after the Australian Qantas
Air Lines. (Iran Air was ranked second best only to Qantas as the world’s safest airline and
the reason for Iran Air becoming the second was due to the fact that Qantas was in business much longer than Iran Air. See the link below for details).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air
Iran's universities were attracting foreign students and Iran became a progressive & promising country like never before. That was not what the greedy mean British could tolerate as Anthony Parsons the former British Ambassador to Iran once said:
"The Shah's attempt to modernize Iran was wrong & Iran's place in the world should not be higher than its neighbouring Afghanistan".
5: The Shah's fast race to make Iran the second Japan of the Middle East, a country politically and economically independent and His Late Majesty's government’s refusal to renew the expiring 25 year old oil contact of 1954 with the western consortium (which funnily enough was due to expire in 1979!!!) prompted the USA & Britain to take action against the modernizer monarch. So in a sense yes, it was the Shah's ambitious plans for the advancement of Iran which caused his downfall.
Contrary to your claim, the west never supported the Shah. The disgraceful & unforgettable treatment of the western media, specially the British & the Americans before, during and even after his fall is testimony to this claim.
32-years after his death, you have not stopped your campaign of terror and demonization of the
late Shah and his family, while allowing the Mullahs daily crimes to go virtually unreported.
In support of this compelling fact that the Mullahs were supported by Britain, let me remind you of Dr Shapour Bakhtiar, Iran's last legal Prime Minister under the Shah who in a meeting with a group of Iranians in Los Angeles in 1984 said: "Khomeini & the Mullahs are tools and the elements of Britain in Iran, used by that country any time they want to harm and punish the Iranian nation".
Dr. Bakhtiar himself paid the price for candidly exposing the Mullahs and their British backers. He was butchered to death by the Mullah's agents at his home in Paris on 6th of August 1991.
See Dr. Bakhtiar's comments in LA in 1984, on the subject of British support for the terrorist Mullahs. (YOUTUBE Min: 2.34 to 3.05):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-OlO_ZHtTk&feature=related
You wrote: “Ali Reza knew that the efforts of his brother in Washington D. C. were misbegotten”
6: But how much did you know about Prince Ali Reza personally and how many times did you
speak to or interview the late Prince to come to such conclusion? I do not think you have ever met the Prince. Are you not misleading your readers by acting as if you knew the Prince personally and that you were qualifed to speak on his behalf or even about him?
You wrote: "The crimes of the kings of Iran have blackened the pages of history, it is the kings
of Iran that have constantly ordered massacres of their own people".
7: You must be in full agreement with Khomeini when you quoted him and I guess you could not find anyone more honest more credible & more trusted than that mass genocidal murderer when referring to the topics such as human rights in Iran.
In my E-mail of 11th of January 2011, I have asked you to give us two examples of the Shah's crimes yet it seems that you are no different to snakes spewing your venom and disappearing fast.
Khomeini’s remarks were idiotic and preposterous & your reference to his baseless and unfounded lies is shameful.
Perhaps you did not bother to research enough about the life of the late Shah or little you know that your systematic character assassination was leveled at a benevolent king who twice pardoned his would be assassins. Parviz Nikkhah was one of them who in April of 1965 failed to carry his assassination attempt. The late Shah pardoned him and other co-conspirators in the failed assassination attempts of 1949 & 1965.
It is also very obvious that you did not bother to research about the life of Khomeini either. Or else you would not have used the vindictive lies of such mass murderer who had no regards for human rights as evidence for your character assassination of the late Shah of Iran.
(Note: formatting of text in archival articles has been removed to reduce files sizes, so reading them is a long SINGLE paragraph, which contains all the information but not separated into paragraphs as was the original. The content value makes this annoyance well worth accepting)
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/who-is-ayatollah-khomeini.html
Or perhaps you are aware of Khomeini & his successor’s crimes but used his shameful lies regardless.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/jimmy-carters-illegal-demands-on-shah.html
You conveniently and shamefully have repeated the untrue remarks made by Khomeini who remains as one of the worst killers in Iran's entire history. Did you not know that it was Khomeini who in 1989 and in a the short period of two to three weeks ordered the mass execution of more than 18000 to 22000 MKO members held in Iran's prisons?
Read what a lunatic Khomeini was through his own writings and books and realize to what extent you are comparing a Monarch, who loved his country to a man who when asked three times what he felt about returning to Iran, responded ON CAMERA with "nothing".
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2010/03/two-books-by-famous-mullah-leader.html
Did you not know that since the beginning of this year OFFICIAL figures alone that more than 195 people were executed in Iran? Did you not know that according to Mr. Kenneth
Timmerman and others monitoring the events in Iran, in the past two weeks alone one Iranian was hanged every 8 to 10 hours ?
You wrote: and ended your spiteful article by the following remarks: "Ali Reza Pahlavi saw no
end to this new Iran. That is the legacy of his blood. Only through death he could escape it".
You must be a mind reader even though you never talked to the late prince to come such harsh
conclusion on his behalf. In my E-mail of January 18th, I particularly requested a reply from you and again you declined.
What kind of demon has possessed your life to be so evil and unjust toward anyone meeting such tragic end? What Christian value & teachings allows you to be so hateful towards a young scholar who did commit no crime and wished no ill even for his worst enemies?
What personal gain is contained in insulting not only the grieving Pahlavi family but indeed offending millions of Iranians? I feel powerless to describe your pettiness. Whether you wrote what you wrote because of the never ending British grievances towards our sainted monarch or whether you were commissioned by the Islamic Republic to be so nasty, or whether you wrote that article because your hatred for the Pahlavi dynasty is institutionalised in Britain, the Islamic Republic of Iran could not have done a better job than what you did for them.
8: As for whether the Shah & the Pahvis are despised by the Iranians at large or not, one thing is already well established. Take a trip to the heavenly Mullah's Iran that Britain & America imposed on 75 Million Iranians in 1979.
Whether you travel in a taxi, shopping or waiting in a train & metro station you cannot help but constantly hearing the following comments: "GOD BLESS HIS SOUL" (in Iranian: AAN KHODAA BIYAAMORZ) and "MAY LIGHT SHINE ON HIS GRAVE" (In Iranian: NOOR BE GHABRASH BEBAARAD). These are amongst many tributes that one hears everyday
in Iran.
The uttered tributes are most certainly not reserved for Mosadegh or Khomeini but indeed for
the late modernizer Shah Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi the father of modern of Iran.
If you did not already know and would like to know who really is despised by almost all Iranians
inside Iran? I must inform you that Britain for its involvement in the overthrow of the Shah & imposing their bulldozer Khomeini is the most despised country in Iran.
We Iranians will never forget or forgive your active role in chopping Iran to pieces during the Qajar dynasty, the stealing of our oil, your unwarranted invasion & occupation of our defenseless & neutral country during the two world wars.
The overthrow of Reza Shah the Great in 1942, the separation of Bahrain in January of 1970 and the overthrow of the modernizer Shah Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi in 1979. Your continued support and appeasement of the Mullah's murderous regime as well as your commitment to oppose regime change in Iran in the past 32 years and your contributions to our sufferings are amongst the many reasons why the Brits are the most undesired people in Iran.
As for how true or false is this claim your rude awakening will come in that trip.
Shortly I will be lodging a complaint to the British Press Complaint Commission
Mohammad-Reza Pardisan, London.
=============================================
Below are the links & information on the rate & the
causes of suicide in the Islamic Republic of Iran:
Suicide Is The Second Leading Cause Of Death In Iran:
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Suicide-is-the-second-leading-cause-of-death-in-Iran-7658.htm
Do Countries With Sharia Law Have A Higher Suicide Rate?:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100910020613AAy9uB0
Women, Main Victim of Suicide in Iran:
http://www.parstimes.com/women/womens_suicide.html
220 Women In Iran Province Committed Suicide:
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/?option=com_content&task=view&id=1494
Suicide Rate Rises Among Women In Iran Provinces:
http://archive.thepeninsulaqatar.com/component/content/article/391-middle-east-archive/116972.html
Every 8 to 10 hours, one Iranian is hanged in Islamic prisons but the real number of executions, which include being taken out into the desert and cruelly shot - slowly, painfully, starting at the feet, aiming at breaking bone, up the legs, knees, all the way up - expressly AVOIDING any lethal spots to prolong the torture adds hundreds to these "OFFICIAL" figures.
Plus add what goes on - unreported in over 100 "unofficial" prisons, which report to no central authority but whose existence has been confirmed by the Director of Islamic Iran's Prisons to explain why he does not have control of all prisons.
AND A RESPONSE FOR IRRESPONSIBLE REMARKS BY DAVID USBORNE:
Mr. David Usborne;
More than one month has gone since your news reporting/ article about the death of Prince
Ali Reza Pahlavi appeared in the Independent of January 6th 2011.
I have sent you two letters questioning the motive behind your hostile and inaccurate reporting.
I have pointed some of the factual errors in that article yet I have not received any reply
I have also made several telephone calls to the chief editor's office at the Independent newspaper, your foreign news desk and foreign editorial desk. I spoke several times to Miss. Enjoli Laston who asked me to write a letter and leave a contact telephone number. Miss. Laston promised that someone will either write or telephone me.
My second letter of 18th January 2011 was again addressed to you with copies to your editorial team requesting a reply either from yourself or from any member of your editorial team. On 26th of January, I decided to make my final telephone call before writing this letter. I was connected to someone with the name of Paul Peachey who twice put the phone down on me.
I than decided to contact Miss. Denise Thompson in the chief editor’s office. She promised to investigate why I have not received any reply.
Later that day on January 26th 2011, I got a short formal E-mail from Mr. Imogen Haddon but none of the points in my previous E-mails were addressed.
Your article which offended me and many more people started with vindictive and hatful remarks.
You even seemed to find the Late Prince Ali-Reza's neighbours as well as the neighbourhood which he lived in, the type of car he drove or the secured window shutters of his apartment as topics for your sarcastic insults.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/death-of-a-prince-latest-tragedy-to-hit-irans-dynasty-2177183.html
Here are the points in your news article which are misleading as well as misrepresentation of
the truth:
You wrote: "but to those who are within Iran's borders, the passing of the former Prince might
barely be worthy of comment". You than continue to say that: "If the family is honest with itself, it might want to consider this as possibility. The man who was once prince was driven to despair because he knew that he and all the Pahlavis remain despised in Iran today, not by the Ayatollahs who overthrow their father but by Iranians at large. If the Iranian exiles feel nostalgia for the days of the Shah, they are alone".
I don't know how you came to these inaccurate conclusions. That is if you did not make a
conscious decision to misinform your readers. The outpouring of your never ending animosity not only towards a young scholar who was only 12 years old when he left Iran and had nothing to do with the decision makings of the previous governments under his late father but indeed your hatred towards the dynasty that transformed Iranian's way of life is very apparent.
As for your comment that the death of the young prince was barely noticeable in Iran & whether
Pahlavis are despised by all in Iran or whether the Iranian exiles are alone in supporting the Pahlavis - the following are some facts that you should consider if you and your editorial team want to be honest with yourselves.
1: According to the Time Magazine of January 10th 2011, the death of the young prince was
received in Iran with great sadness. Al-Arabia reporting the reaction to the news from Iran by
saying that: 32 years after the fall of the Shah, the Pahlavi family remains as Iran's number one
family. Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times and others had similar stories all disagreeing
with your nonsense and lies.
On Monday January 24th VOA had a report on its web site confirming that inside Iran the people showed their sympathy in many different ways including throwing flowers in to the Caspian sea, where the ashes from the remains of the late prince (according to his will)
are to be scattered. We have confirmation from inside Iran.
2: For the past two weeks, the Iranian exile TV channels and radio stations received endless calls from all corners of Iran many to upset to speak. The Internet sites from both inside and outside Iran were full of sympathy messages for the Pahlavi family. Just one visit to YOU TUBE and the social networking sites such as Facebooks will reflects the mood of the Iranians.
The death of the young Prince resembled the tragic death of Neda in the hands of the Murderers goons of the British backed Ayatollahs on 20th of June 2009.
Visit the YOUTUBE links below on the reactions to Prince Ali-Reza Pahlavi's death in Iran
& else where. The links below will contradict your baseless claim that Pahlavis are despised by
all Iranians inside.
Memorial Leaflets Displayed In Public Places In The North Western City Of Rezaiyyeh
shortly after the death of the Prince was announced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P90qCqn_ZgI
Or click here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TEHRRAN#p/c/F31C81BD8BF4B304/18/P90qCqn_ZgI
Leaflets Displayed In Public Places in support of the Pahlavi kings as well as
the writings on walls: (Long Live the Shah, In Farsi: (Javid Shah), ). Friday February
11th 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=061JS7OVDso
Worldwide candle light vigil and memorial services for Prince Ali Reza Pahlavi:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TEHRRAN#p/c/F31C81BD8BF4B304
Barbara Walter's On the Effect On Iranians After Prince Ali Reza Committed Suicide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2se1tRZ9gDY&feature=feedu
Brave lady speaks, Another Example Of Public Support For The Shah. This clip is at
least two years old: (she bravely repeats "Javid Shah = Long Live the Shah"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPHW-ldSeqY
3: On the morning of January 6th, I had at least 12 telephone calls from inside Iran from distressed people who knew me, questioning me about the details of this tragic news and saying how fast the news was received inside Iran and how the mood of the people changed from shock to sorrow.
You wrote: "If the members of this diminishing family abhor what Iran is today-an unforgiving
Islamic theocracy built in part upon hatred it has bestowed on the US and its western allies - they know that it was they who ripened Iran for the event of 1979 that made it so. It was the megalomania of the Shah that enabled Ayatollah Khomeini to lead the revolution and mark the end of centuries of monarchic rule in Persia with celebration".
4: The abhorrence displayed in response to the crimes of the Mullahs by the Pahlavi family is shared by all Iranians but the excesses of this brutal regime cannot be blamed on the late modernizer Shah of Iran.
The Pahlavis have transformed Iran making that country the envy of the enemies such as you in Britain while bringing the respect and the admiration of the world at large.
People were going to Iran not leaving it yet since the Shah left, 7 million Iranians became refugees all over the world. We lived 52 years under the Pahlavis not knowing what war, sanctions, rationing, exile,, mass execution public stoning were.
Iran's currency was the 9th in the list of the world currencies. Iran under the late Shah had the 5th strongest army in the world but never saw a need to go to war with any country.
Iran was loaning to the World Bank and investing heavily in some of the world's best industries.
During the late Shah we had shortage of workers not work.
Iran Air was another success story surpassing the entire American and the European airlines. For at least ten years Iran Air was the second best airline after the Australian Qantas
Air Lines. (Iran Air was ranked second best only to Qantas as the world’s safest airline and
the reason for Iran Air becoming the second was due to the fact that Qantas was in business much longer than Iran Air. See the link below for details).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air
Iran's universities were attracting foreign students and Iran became a progressive & promising country like never before. That was not what the greedy mean British could tolerate as Anthony Parsons the former British Ambassador to Iran once said:
"The Shah's attempt to modernize Iran was wrong & Iran's place in the world should not be higher than its neighbouring Afghanistan".
5: The Shah's fast race to make Iran the second Japan of the Middle East, a country politically and economically independent and His Late Majesty's government’s refusal to renew the expiring 25 year old oil contact of 1954 with the western consortium (which funnily enough was due to expire in 1979!!!) prompted the USA & Britain to take action against the modernizer monarch. So in a sense yes, it was the Shah's ambitious plans for the advancement of Iran which caused his downfall.
Contrary to your claim, the west never supported the Shah. The disgraceful & unforgettable treatment of the western media, specially the British & the Americans before, during and even after his fall is testimony to this claim.
32-years after his death, you have not stopped your campaign of terror and demonization of the
late Shah and his family, while allowing the Mullahs daily crimes to go virtually unreported.
In support of this compelling fact that the Mullahs were supported by Britain, let me remind you of Dr Shapour Bakhtiar, Iran's last legal Prime Minister under the Shah who in a meeting with a group of Iranians in Los Angeles in 1984 said: "Khomeini & the Mullahs are tools and the elements of Britain in Iran, used by that country any time they want to harm and punish the Iranian nation".
Dr. Bakhtiar himself paid the price for candidly exposing the Mullahs and their British backers. He was butchered to death by the Mullah's agents at his home in Paris on 6th of August 1991.
See Dr. Bakhtiar's comments in LA in 1984, on the subject of British support for the terrorist Mullahs. (YOUTUBE Min: 2.34 to 3.05):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-OlO_ZHtTk&feature=related
You wrote: “Ali Reza knew that the efforts of his brother in Washington D. C. were misbegotten”
6: But how much did you know about Prince Ali Reza personally and how many times did you
speak to or interview the late Prince to come to such conclusion? I do not think you have ever met the Prince. Are you not misleading your readers by acting as if you knew the Prince personally and that you were qualifed to speak on his behalf or even about him?
You wrote: "The crimes of the kings of Iran have blackened the pages of history, it is the kings
of Iran that have constantly ordered massacres of their own people".
7: You must be in full agreement with Khomeini when you quoted him and I guess you could not find anyone more honest more credible & more trusted than that mass genocidal murderer when referring to the topics such as human rights in Iran.
In my E-mail of 11th of January 2011, I have asked you to give us two examples of the Shah's crimes yet it seems that you are no different to snakes spewing your venom and disappearing fast.
Khomeini’s remarks were idiotic and preposterous & your reference to his baseless and unfounded lies is shameful.
Perhaps you did not bother to research enough about the life of the late Shah or little you know that your systematic character assassination was leveled at a benevolent king who twice pardoned his would be assassins. Parviz Nikkhah was one of them who in April of 1965 failed to carry his assassination attempt. The late Shah pardoned him and other co-conspirators in the failed assassination attempts of 1949 & 1965.
It is also very obvious that you did not bother to research about the life of Khomeini either. Or else you would not have used the vindictive lies of such mass murderer who had no regards for human rights as evidence for your character assassination of the late Shah of Iran.
(Note: formatting of text in archival articles has been removed to reduce files sizes, so reading them is a long SINGLE paragraph, which contains all the information but not separated into paragraphs as was the original. The content value makes this annoyance well worth accepting)
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/who-is-ayatollah-khomeini.html
Or perhaps you are aware of Khomeini & his successor’s crimes but used his shameful lies regardless.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/jimmy-carters-illegal-demands-on-shah.html
You conveniently and shamefully have repeated the untrue remarks made by Khomeini who remains as one of the worst killers in Iran's entire history. Did you not know that it was Khomeini who in 1989 and in a the short period of two to three weeks ordered the mass execution of more than 18000 to 22000 MKO members held in Iran's prisons?
Read what a lunatic Khomeini was through his own writings and books and realize to what extent you are comparing a Monarch, who loved his country to a man who when asked three times what he felt about returning to Iran, responded ON CAMERA with "nothing".
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2010/03/two-books-by-famous-mullah-leader.html
Did you not know that since the beginning of this year OFFICIAL figures alone that more than 195 people were executed in Iran? Did you not know that according to Mr. Kenneth
Timmerman and others monitoring the events in Iran, in the past two weeks alone one Iranian was hanged every 8 to 10 hours ?
You wrote: and ended your spiteful article by the following remarks: "Ali Reza Pahlavi saw no
end to this new Iran. That is the legacy of his blood. Only through death he could escape it".
You must be a mind reader even though you never talked to the late prince to come such harsh
conclusion on his behalf. In my E-mail of January 18th, I particularly requested a reply from you and again you declined.
What kind of demon has possessed your life to be so evil and unjust toward anyone meeting such tragic end? What Christian value & teachings allows you to be so hateful towards a young scholar who did commit no crime and wished no ill even for his worst enemies?
What personal gain is contained in insulting not only the grieving Pahlavi family but indeed offending millions of Iranians? I feel powerless to describe your pettiness. Whether you wrote what you wrote because of the never ending British grievances towards our sainted monarch or whether you were commissioned by the Islamic Republic to be so nasty, or whether you wrote that article because your hatred for the Pahlavi dynasty is institutionalised in Britain, the Islamic Republic of Iran could not have done a better job than what you did for them.
8: As for whether the Shah & the Pahvis are despised by the Iranians at large or not, one thing is already well established. Take a trip to the heavenly Mullah's Iran that Britain & America imposed on 75 Million Iranians in 1979.
Whether you travel in a taxi, shopping or waiting in a train & metro station you cannot help but constantly hearing the following comments: "GOD BLESS HIS SOUL" (in Iranian: AAN KHODAA BIYAAMORZ) and "MAY LIGHT SHINE ON HIS GRAVE" (In Iranian: NOOR BE GHABRASH BEBAARAD). These are amongst many tributes that one hears everyday
in Iran.
The uttered tributes are most certainly not reserved for Mosadegh or Khomeini but indeed for
the late modernizer Shah Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi the father of modern of Iran.
If you did not already know and would like to know who really is despised by almost all Iranians
inside Iran? I must inform you that Britain for its involvement in the overthrow of the Shah & imposing their bulldozer Khomeini is the most despised country in Iran.
We Iranians will never forget or forgive your active role in chopping Iran to pieces during the Qajar dynasty, the stealing of our oil, your unwarranted invasion & occupation of our defenseless & neutral country during the two world wars.
The overthrow of Reza Shah the Great in 1942, the separation of Bahrain in January of 1970 and the overthrow of the modernizer Shah Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi in 1979. Your continued support and appeasement of the Mullah's murderous regime as well as your commitment to oppose regime change in Iran in the past 32 years and your contributions to our sufferings are amongst the many reasons why the Brits are the most undesired people in Iran.
As for how true or false is this claim your rude awakening will come in that trip.
Shortly I will be lodging a complaint to the British Press Complaint Commission
Mohammad-Reza Pardisan, London.
=============================================
Below are the links & information on the rate & the
causes of suicide in the Islamic Republic of Iran:
Suicide Is The Second Leading Cause Of Death In Iran:
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Suicide-is-the-second-leading-cause-of-death-in-Iran-7658.htm
Do Countries With Sharia Law Have A Higher Suicide Rate?:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100910020613AAy9uB0
Women, Main Victim of Suicide in Iran:
http://www.parstimes.com/women/womens_suicide.html
220 Women In Iran Province Committed Suicide:
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/?option=com_content&task=view&id=1494
Suicide Rate Rises Among Women In Iran Provinces:
http://archive.thepeninsulaqatar.com/component/content/article/391-middle-east-archive/116972.html
Every 8 to 10 hours, one Iranian is hanged in Islamic prisons but the real number of executions, which include being taken out into the desert and cruelly shot - slowly, painfully, starting at the feet, aiming at breaking bone, up the legs, knees, all the way up - expressly AVOIDING any lethal spots to prolong the torture adds hundreds to these "OFFICIAL" figures.
Plus add what goes on - unreported in over 100 "unofficial" prisons, which report to no central authority but whose existence has been confirmed by the Director of Islamic Iran's Prisons to explain why he does not have control of all prisons.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
FINALLY SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT FOR THE SHAH
Finally someone speaks up for the late Shah!
Iran’s Shah had no special interest in monetary wealth
Published: February 8 2011
From Mr Robert F. Armao.
Sir, I am writing to correct inaccuracies in “Reforms focus on recovering rogue leaders’ assets” (January 26).
The graphic asserts that the late Shah of Iran stole Iranian government assets valued at $35bn and that the US froze assets of the Shah valued at $20m.
The reported gross revenues of the government of Iran during the reign of the Shah were approximately $120bn, with disbursements for defence, social welfare and infrastructure, making it impossible that $35bn was directed solely to the Shah.
In an effort to vilify the Shah, representatives and supporters of the Islamic Republic have continued to increase the value of the assets of the Shah and his family. Based on the fact that the Islamic government had all the original financial records of the Shah’s government, they were well aware that no such assets were removed from Iran during the Shah’s reign.
This despite the fact no such funds were ever located – even after the use of forensic accountants and other investigators – in any country. The Shah, his family and related entities prevailed in each legal action (including the US and Switzerland) initiated by the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Islamic Republic has consistently maintained that the multi-billion US dollar assets of the Pahlavi Foundation of Iran are, in fact, owned by the Shah of Iran and his family.
In fact, the Pahlavi Foundation was controlled by the government of Iran and then the Islamic Republic, and remains so today.
Before his departure from Iran in 1979 and through to the end of his life, I served as senior adviser to the Shah and to his family. I can attest to the fact that the Shah had no particular interest in monetary wealth. His life-long concern was for the well-being of the citizens of Iran.
Robert F. Armao,
New York, NY, US
ALAN NOTE: As someone who also had access to some confidential royal information, the late-Shah had $90 Million (with an M not a B) of personal funds (through legal personal overseas investments over decades) on hand when he left Iran and considering the DAILY expenses of some $10,000 on security, staff etc., this does not go a long way and makes his millionaire status rather a "poor man level" compared to the millionaires who abound.
He could have transfered about $3.5 BILLION of the Pahlavi Foundation funds to himself overseas but refused to touch it saying the money belonged to the Iranian people, even though the funds came about and grew through his good judgement calls in investing it for the nation.
Obama insists those who hate him (Obama) do so because they not know him. For those of us who knew the late Shah, this applies forcefully and those who criticized the Shah knew very little of his aspirations to bring Iran into the modern world and his actions to achieve this.
I remember openly confronting Prime Minister Amir Abbas Hoveyda, a friend of mine, with not sharing the improvements His Majesty and he had brought into being over the 13-years that Hoveyda had held his post, leaving the populace totally in the dark of the immense progress the country was enjoying.
With typical Aquarian (February 18th) lofty idealism, he replied: "we are doing what we are supposed to be doing and it is not the role of the government to blow its own trumpet".
Sadly this lack of public information made opposing the Marxist-Islamic Soviet -Khomeini uprising virtually impossible for those of us who tried. There was almost no tangible previously shared information available to counter the lies and disinformation used against the Monarchy.
Friday, February 11, 2011
CONFLUENCE OF REVOLUTION DATES (Largely ignored except by Fox and Beck)
Lost in the flood of news coverage of Egypt's revolution and setting aside President Mubarak, is today coincides with the anniversary of Islamic Regime of Iran's Khomeini revolution in 1979!
===============================
By the way, with Google Executive, Ghonem, claiming credit in using Google/Facebook to incite and organize the Egyptian uprising, in effect mostly in favor of the Moslem Brotherhood, I suppose the AntiMullah site should not be astonished at how deeply Google "search-filter-bots" settings have worked to bury AntiMullah articles. There was a slight relaxation for short period of a mere week or two but they are at it again.
COME ON GOOGLE, GIVE US AMERICANS HERE THE SAME rights and FREEDOMS YOU SO INSIST UPON FOR EGYPTIANS AND STOP FILTERING US OUT WITH SUCH A HEAVY HAND IN FAVOR OF THE WHITE HOUSE OR ISLAM.
Don't go so far over the top to help Islamic movements (often promoted from inside the White House) to gain power and THEN when the time comes, suppress you as a nuisance to them.
Already Homeland Security has put in place ways of confiscating Google under their weird self-assigned powers they have started using on others.
You may have senior "embeds" inside the White House offices but Oba-Hussein will not be there forever - NOR can you count on him not to turn on you when push comes to shove and you get "thrown under the bus" like so many of his allies have been. Both inside the USA or overseas.
==============================
While the pro-Islamic Oba-Hussein regime lambasted the SECULAR Mubarak administration for his repression of his people, how eerily silent it is on what the ISLAMIC regime of Iran has done REPEATEDLY to MANGLE their people into a bloody pulp - far beyond suppression or repression. The key ruthless crowd control forces, the Bassiji are openly called Suppression Forces inside Iran as they work with the IRGC (Revolutionary Guard) to beat, maim or kill, arrest then torture to death anyone who dares appear against the Mullahs.
After declaring a day of martial law, Ahmadi-Nejad flooded the streets on Friday (Iran's Sunday equivalent) with pro-regime demonstrators to overwhelm any anti-regime efforts to protest against the Mullahs, and threatened very harsh treatment of anyone who appeared in protest to his government.
Sporadic anti-regime gatherings occurrred anyway today in Iran but none of the videos have found a place on the Egypt crowded news scene. Nor with the Mullahs largely blocking the Internet, phones and social networks, little is coming out of the black hole they created.
Too busy protecting and promoting the Moslem Brothehood in Egypt, Oba-Hussein has not even uttered a chirp of criticism nor disapproval about Iran.
And with them blocking Persian language BBC transmissions into Iran not much reliable news is coming in. Mostly because they are terrified "unedited" information on successful demonstrations in Egypt will reach the ears of the populace and bring their deep seated frustrations boiling into Iranian streets.
However, it is not over. The Iranian Green Movement is organizing a march within the next couple of days and several of their leaders have openly pronounced support for the demonstrations in Egypt as a path to freedom. Actually against themselves since this movment wants to adjust/change the leadership of Islamic Iran not remove Islam!
Ironically, the Mullahs also support the protests because they have opened the way for a complete take over by Islam (upon examination of tenets there is only a radical kind) in a cascade of regional "days of rage", starting with Bahrain tomorrow, Libya a couple of days later and Algeria the rest of the month.
Meanwhile, in Iran, using a page from the Palestinian 'intifada" and recently Egypt, demonstrators now propose Iranian protesters begin throwing rocks at armed regime suppression forces and burning parts of the bazaar to hurt the economy (much of which belongs to the Mullahs or their surrogates).
===============================
By the way, with Google Executive, Ghonem, claiming credit in using Google/Facebook to incite and organize the Egyptian uprising, in effect mostly in favor of the Moslem Brotherhood, I suppose the AntiMullah site should not be astonished at how deeply Google "search-filter-bots" settings have worked to bury AntiMullah articles. There was a slight relaxation for short period of a mere week or two but they are at it again.
COME ON GOOGLE, GIVE US AMERICANS HERE THE SAME rights and FREEDOMS YOU SO INSIST UPON FOR EGYPTIANS AND STOP FILTERING US OUT WITH SUCH A HEAVY HAND IN FAVOR OF THE WHITE HOUSE OR ISLAM.
Don't go so far over the top to help Islamic movements (often promoted from inside the White House) to gain power and THEN when the time comes, suppress you as a nuisance to them.
Already Homeland Security has put in place ways of confiscating Google under their weird self-assigned powers they have started using on others.
You may have senior "embeds" inside the White House offices but Oba-Hussein will not be there forever - NOR can you count on him not to turn on you when push comes to shove and you get "thrown under the bus" like so many of his allies have been. Both inside the USA or overseas.
==============================
While the pro-Islamic Oba-Hussein regime lambasted the SECULAR Mubarak administration for his repression of his people, how eerily silent it is on what the ISLAMIC regime of Iran has done REPEATEDLY to MANGLE their people into a bloody pulp - far beyond suppression or repression. The key ruthless crowd control forces, the Bassiji are openly called Suppression Forces inside Iran as they work with the IRGC (Revolutionary Guard) to beat, maim or kill, arrest then torture to death anyone who dares appear against the Mullahs.
After declaring a day of martial law, Ahmadi-Nejad flooded the streets on Friday (Iran's Sunday equivalent) with pro-regime demonstrators to overwhelm any anti-regime efforts to protest against the Mullahs, and threatened very harsh treatment of anyone who appeared in protest to his government.
Sporadic anti-regime gatherings occurrred anyway today in Iran but none of the videos have found a place on the Egypt crowded news scene. Nor with the Mullahs largely blocking the Internet, phones and social networks, little is coming out of the black hole they created.
Too busy protecting and promoting the Moslem Brothehood in Egypt, Oba-Hussein has not even uttered a chirp of criticism nor disapproval about Iran.
And with them blocking Persian language BBC transmissions into Iran not much reliable news is coming in. Mostly because they are terrified "unedited" information on successful demonstrations in Egypt will reach the ears of the populace and bring their deep seated frustrations boiling into Iranian streets.
However, it is not over. The Iranian Green Movement is organizing a march within the next couple of days and several of their leaders have openly pronounced support for the demonstrations in Egypt as a path to freedom. Actually against themselves since this movment wants to adjust/change the leadership of Islamic Iran not remove Islam!
Ironically, the Mullahs also support the protests because they have opened the way for a complete take over by Islam (upon examination of tenets there is only a radical kind) in a cascade of regional "days of rage", starting with Bahrain tomorrow, Libya a couple of days later and Algeria the rest of the month.
Meanwhile, in Iran, using a page from the Palestinian 'intifada" and recently Egypt, demonstrators now propose Iranian protesters begin throwing rocks at armed regime suppression forces and burning parts of the bazaar to hurt the economy (much of which belongs to the Mullahs or their surrogates).
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
Tuesday, February 08, 2011
TUESDAY 2/8 VIEWS BUDGET CUT PROPOSAL
FIRST PAGE OF JUNIOR SENATOR'S CAPABLE BILL TO CUT HALF TRILLION DOLLARS FROM OBA-HUSSEIN'S BUDGET! IN ONE YEAR!
View the rest of the Senate Bill here AND EXAMINE THE BOLD CUTS FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2011/01/rand-pauls-plan-to-immediately-slash-half-a-trillion-in-spending.php?page=1
View the rest of the Senate Bill here AND EXAMINE THE BOLD CUTS FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2011/01/rand-pauls-plan-to-immediately-slash-half-a-trillion-in-spending.php?page=1
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
OBA-HUSSEIN EMBOLDENED TERRORISTS DO A DRY RUN
This is unbelievable… this can happen in America. We must not upset anybody. Diversity is sadly more important than the lives of 13 killed (opinion by General Chase who should be fired).
Specially Oba-Hussein protected groups lke Islamic jihadis.
This is unbelievable. The story on the web makes it all sound so nonchalant. http://www.khou.com/news/Phone-call-delays-Houston-bound-AirTran-flight-70369417.html
Then I got this email from my good friend Tedd Petruna, a diver at the NBL facility at NASA who I used to work with. He happened to be on this same flight. In my opinion, the muslims are all getting very brave now, since they have one of their own in the White House. Read Tedd's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media are so politically correct now that they are afraid to report that these were all muslims. Unbelievable! Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.
Semper Fi,
A. Gene Hackemack.
B. ----- Original Message -----
From: Petruna, Tedd J. (JSC-DX12)[RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY]
To: undisclosed-recipients
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 11:32 AM
One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, November 17, I returned home. If you read the papers, you may have seen a blurb where an AirTran flight was cancelled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before takeoff. It was on Fox.
That was NOT what happened!
I was in first class coming home. Eleven muslim men got on the plane in full attire. Two sat in first class and the rest peppered themselves throughout the plane all the way to the back. As the plane taxied to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel we are all so familiar with. At that time, one of the men got on his cell and called one of his companions in the back and proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very aggressively. This took the first stewardess out of the picture for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at the time. He ignored her as if she wasn't there.
The second man who answered the phone did the same and this took out the second stewardess. In the back of the plane at this time, 2 younger muslims, one in the back aisle, and one in front of him, window, began to show footage of a porno they had taped the night before, and were very loud about it. Now, they are only permitted to do this prior to Jihad. If a Muslim man goes into a strip club, he has to view the woman via mirror with his back to her (don't ask me, I don't make the rules, but I've studied). The third stewardess informed them that they were not to have electronic devices on at this time. To which one of the men said, "Shut up, infidel dog!" She went to take the camcorder and he began to scream in her face in Arabic.
At that exact moment, all 11 of them got up and started to walk to the cabin. This is where I had had enough! I got up and started to the back where I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size say, "I got your back." I grabbed the man who had been on the phone by the arm and said, "you WILL go sit down or you Will be thrown from this plane!" As I led him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed out with him. I then grabbed the second man and said, "You WILL do the same!" He protested but adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go. As I escorted him forward, the plane doors open and 3 TSA agents and 4 police officers entered. Me and my new Texan friend were told to cease and desist for they had this under control. I was happy to oblige actually. There was some commotion in the back, but within moments, all 11 were escorted off the plane. They then unloaded their luggage.
We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened, when suddenly, the door opened again and on walked all eleven!! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic (the only way I can describe it). The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw this, she was having NONE of it! Being that I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agent there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with these men. The agent told her they had searched them and were going to go through their luggage with a fine tooth comb and that they were allowed to proceed to Houston. The captain and co-captain came out and told the agent, "we and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on.
Again, this is where I had had enough!! I got up and asked, "What the hell is going on?" I was told to take my seat. They were sorry for the delay and I would be home shortly. I said, "I’m getting off this plane." The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off.
Now I'm mad! I said, "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, who's time is mine with a family at home and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm!! But I am going through that door!!" And I heard a voice behind me say, "So am I." Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same. Within 2 minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met with more agents who asked me to write a statement. I had 5 hours to kill at this point so why the hell not. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was cancelled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6pm. I got here at 12:30am.
Look up the date. Flight 297, Atlanta to Houston.
If this wasn't a dry run, I don't know what one is. They wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it.
I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat is real. I saw it with my own eyes.
Tedd Petruna
A. Gene Hackemack
979-251-2310 cell & home
buttonbox01@gmail.com
8725 Hwy 290 W
Brenham TX 77833
"Old Soldiers never die; they just fade away." General Douglas MacArthur
Specially Oba-Hussein protected groups lke Islamic jihadis.
This is unbelievable. The story on the web makes it all sound so nonchalant. http://www.khou.com/news/Phone-call-delays-Houston-bound-AirTran-flight-70369417.html
Then I got this email from my good friend Tedd Petruna, a diver at the NBL facility at NASA who I used to work with. He happened to be on this same flight. In my opinion, the muslims are all getting very brave now, since they have one of their own in the White House. Read Tedd's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media are so politically correct now that they are afraid to report that these were all muslims. Unbelievable! Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.
Semper Fi,
A. Gene Hackemack.
B. ----- Original Message -----
From: Petruna, Tedd J. (JSC-DX12)[RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY]
To: undisclosed-recipients
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 11:32 AM
One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, November 17, I returned home. If you read the papers, you may have seen a blurb where an AirTran flight was cancelled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before takeoff. It was on Fox.
That was NOT what happened!
I was in first class coming home. Eleven muslim men got on the plane in full attire. Two sat in first class and the rest peppered themselves throughout the plane all the way to the back. As the plane taxied to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel we are all so familiar with. At that time, one of the men got on his cell and called one of his companions in the back and proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very aggressively. This took the first stewardess out of the picture for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at the time. He ignored her as if she wasn't there.
The second man who answered the phone did the same and this took out the second stewardess. In the back of the plane at this time, 2 younger muslims, one in the back aisle, and one in front of him, window, began to show footage of a porno they had taped the night before, and were very loud about it. Now, they are only permitted to do this prior to Jihad. If a Muslim man goes into a strip club, he has to view the woman via mirror with his back to her (don't ask me, I don't make the rules, but I've studied). The third stewardess informed them that they were not to have electronic devices on at this time. To which one of the men said, "Shut up, infidel dog!" She went to take the camcorder and he began to scream in her face in Arabic.
At that exact moment, all 11 of them got up and started to walk to the cabin. This is where I had had enough! I got up and started to the back where I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size say, "I got your back." I grabbed the man who had been on the phone by the arm and said, "you WILL go sit down or you Will be thrown from this plane!" As I led him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed out with him. I then grabbed the second man and said, "You WILL do the same!" He protested but adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go. As I escorted him forward, the plane doors open and 3 TSA agents and 4 police officers entered. Me and my new Texan friend were told to cease and desist for they had this under control. I was happy to oblige actually. There was some commotion in the back, but within moments, all 11 were escorted off the plane. They then unloaded their luggage.
We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened, when suddenly, the door opened again and on walked all eleven!! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic (the only way I can describe it). The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw this, she was having NONE of it! Being that I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agent there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with these men. The agent told her they had searched them and were going to go through their luggage with a fine tooth comb and that they were allowed to proceed to Houston. The captain and co-captain came out and told the agent, "we and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on.
Again, this is where I had had enough!! I got up and asked, "What the hell is going on?" I was told to take my seat. They were sorry for the delay and I would be home shortly. I said, "I’m getting off this plane." The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off.
Now I'm mad! I said, "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, who's time is mine with a family at home and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm!! But I am going through that door!!" And I heard a voice behind me say, "So am I." Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same. Within 2 minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met with more agents who asked me to write a statement. I had 5 hours to kill at this point so why the hell not. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was cancelled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6pm. I got here at 12:30am.
Look up the date. Flight 297, Atlanta to Houston.
If this wasn't a dry run, I don't know what one is. They wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it.
I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat is real. I saw it with my own eyes.
Tedd Petruna
A. Gene Hackemack
979-251-2310 cell & home
buttonbox01@gmail.com
8725 Hwy 290 W
Brenham TX 77833
"Old Soldiers never die; they just fade away." General Douglas MacArthur
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
