Tuesday, January 13, 2009
CHANGE OF PACE FROM DEATH AND DESTRUCTION
Monday, January 12, 2009
SCOTUS DECISION OF MONDAY ON OBAMA BC
COUNT DOWN TO ISRAEL ATTACK ON MULLAH IRAN
Sunday, January 11, 2009
HAMAS CHILDREN PHOTOS & HUMAN SHIELD VIDEO
THE QUEEN AND I (BILINGUAL ENGLISH & FARSI)
OBAMA HAS STILL TO PROVE HE HAS A REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE
Saturday, January 10, 2009
HAMAS CHILDREN PART 2
Friday, January 09, 2009
CHILDREN OF HAMAS TERRORISTS
Response to a bunch of photos (some unclear as to whether the “oppressor” is an Israeli) Emailed out by a group of Iranians protesting attacks on Gaza. Very interesting “chicken or the egg” disinformation through photos (removed) And the question arises of which palestinians are being killed and who is actually killing or causing to be killed, more of such “palestinians”. Yes, the Israelis have declared war and are killing people in Gaza, which happens in war, but what would you do if you lived in Manhattan, New York and for the past year you had some 6,000 rockets fired at you from New Jersey? You never had a sure moment of safety FOR YEARS, never knew if an indiscriminate, un-aimed, random rocket would kill the civilian you, your family or a child? How long would it be before you got your neighbors together and drove to New Jersey and put a stop to it if law enforcement failed to do it? Just because 6,000 efforts FAILED to kill more people cannot be used as an apology for the actions. They are unforgiveable no matter at whom they are directed. There is no proportionality involved.
If you try to kill me and my family with a shotgun or hand guns and I have a submachine gun at home and fire back and kill you and your fellow attackers with my higher fire power does not excuse your attempted murder nor place the blame on me. I am not going to get into a “pissing contest” by providing even more numerous photos of palestinian atrocities. They are available from NON-Israeli sources.
Or of palestinians using ambulances, including UN marked ones, to carry arms and gunmen past security.
Or persuading Reuters (which has close links to the “iranian taazi” Mullahs) to pose photos that appear to be atrocities but are set up using various palestinians or Hezbollah or Hamas supporters.
Video of this somewhere on the Antimullah site among the eight site sections. However, you might care to look at: (second or third article) http://antimullah.com/ and view the two recent videos near the top. Permalink http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/01/hamas-killing-palestinians-iraqis.html What you may also not know is that the palestinians are setting up charity drives to raise money for Gaza for food and medication etc., in the USA and Europe - meanwhile reports coming in directly from the ground over there is that Hamas has “confiscated” nearly all currently available stores of medicines and food staples, taken over the incoming aid and is NOW RESELLING these back to the population at high prices!
Are Hamas palestinians too or not? Ask some of the residents of Gaza, don’t just take my word for it. I am not Jewish nor a proponent of any formalized religion but facts are facts and the emotional, not based on real facts, accusations brought out to enflame anti-Israeli sentiments are a good disinformation effort but need to be challenged when so exaggerated and incorrect. Or better, directed against the Mullahs in “islamic iran”, where the miserable populace is suffering far more death, hunger, oppression and misery than the so-called “palestinians” ever have or ever will from the Israelis. Many of their citizens being Arabs granted full status! NO ARAB COUNTRY (except Jordan to some extent) despite sometimes huge, empty land tracts, considerable riches has granted a formal status, citizenship or permission to live outside “refugee camps” inside that country.
Why? I know the answer but do you? Why not attack those Arab nations for not doing their best to provide shelter and comfort (beyond ghetto camps) to these “palestinians”, whom they profess to love so much?
Nor do the so-called palestinians want to move to even a great site and lose their “victimhood” status that has the west pouring billions into their coffers.
They might have to work to build a nation and they seem to be better at destruction than construction. Fight/shout for your own Iranian people, not for foreignerfs overseas in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria who receive tons of money (hundreds of millions of dollars – Syria alone another HALF BILLION to buy Russian weapons) , smuggled weapons and supplies from the Mullahs using the Iranian peoples’ treasure” .
While there are nearly ONE MILLION abandoned street children in the cities, over half in Tehran. When there are over 100,000 abandoned women on the streets with no way to earn a living but with their bodies – if young enough.
With others being sold in Mullah owned Dubai hotels as slave-trafficked prostitutes (concealed as temporary wives in Islam) with nobody to whom to appeal or complain. For humor check out the Multilingual section and view the “marg bar Philistine” (DEATH TO PALESTINE) video in Iran during the Ghods Day (JERUSALEM DAY) demonstrations in Iran. Also what you may not really know (like it or not) there is no such thing as a palestinian people/race and their websites and history go back for ONLY some 60-years and do not mention any documented, long time history. There is none.
Read the full details of “unrevised” history in the article below” and see that Arab nations want “palestinians” close to Israel as an excuse to work toward the annihilation of this tiny Jewish nation.
But will not grant them land, say in vast tracts of Tunisia, or other North African country, where they could form a United Nations mandated Palestine State” similarly to how Israel was formed. Even huge land mass Canada refused to accept a proposal to give up a bit of land after every Arab nation refused to consider this logical solution.
Specially as historically, the nearest to a population with anything resembling the name of palestinian, were the Philistines – whose race WENT EXTINCT 3,000 yes 3,000 years ago and cannot be the forebears of the people claiming to be from a specific Palestinian race that currently lays claim to any part of the Israeli region. http://noiri.blogspot.com/2006/08/u-p-d-t-e-d-palestinians-pure.html
Thursday, January 08, 2009
HAMAS KILLING PALESTINIANS, IRAQIS KILLING IRAQIS
AND IRAQIS KILLING IRAQIS
BREAKING NEWS - LISTEN TO/PARTICIPATE PHIL BERG DIRECTLY
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
MILITARY "CLASS ACTION" (my words) TYPE SUIT
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
Sunday, January 04, 2009
REASONS WHY OBAMA WILL NEITHER PUBLICLY SPEAK ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN NOR PRODUCE HIS ORIGINAL BC
Alan note: On January 8th the Electoral Votes will be certified by Congress at which time EVERY citizen of the USA will have standing to sue Obama and demand he produce documentation to PROVE he is eligible to be President.
SCOTUS (Supreme Court) has a hearing scheduled on the 9th to review a law suit up before them. If Obama refuses to comply by providing documentation they decide (if they decide) to require, then at a hearing on January 16th they can review another case and declare (if they so wish) the Electoral Vote (retroactively) nullified.
Will SCOTUS have the courage to defend the Constitution as is their role? And risk race riots verging on civil war? Or will they fold and throw our Constitution under Obama's bus.
We know why Obama is not speaking of his BC, what we all want to know is “What are the reasons why SCOTUS, SENATE, AND THE HOUSE will not force him to play his hand and release his real original birth certificate.”
They have the power, what are the actual reasons for not making sure he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. IT’S THE LAW.
Jetxnet posits the following: There appears to be an unprecedented level of collusion between numerous political power brokers on both sides of the political divide, elected and appointed officials on both the federal and state levels, as well as members of the corporate media.
It is interesting if not alarming to take a few steps back in an effort to gain a wider perspective, and finding unusual alliances and political 'bed partners' among various members this group.... Some events... have taken place within the past several years ... that have effectively changed or otherwise had a direct impact on the social and geopolitical landscape of America and its power structure.
A few examples include such things as NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement), the SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership) treaty, border and immigration issues, the PATRIOT Act, the Global Poverty Act of 2007, the management of the oil "crisis," the most recent economic crisis and the remedies enacted, and the recent G-20 economic summit, where President Bush essentially provided economic oversight of U.S. economic institutions to the European Union.
The goal is the North American Union (NAU) by 2010, thus selling out America as we know it.
The NAU is just part of this global geopolitical agenda. The other part, of course, would be to have the other continents condense into Unions, such as Africa, South America, and the Middle East.
Obama is their pick. They believe because of his Arabic name and the color of his skin, he will be able to draw Africa and the Middle East (ME) under Western elitist influence. They surmise this is imperative as both the ME and Africa are engaging China more-so than the West.
Furthermore, Africa and the ME, when combined, account for 2/3 of the world’s energy resources.
The quest for a Middle Eastern and African Union is at the top of the list, and they believe Obama is the best choice to make that happen.
A lot of this information is layed out by the founder of the Council of Foreign Relations and a top foreign policy advisor to Obama - Zbigniew Brzezinski.
In his book, The Grand Chessboard, Zbigniew states that is imperative to get control of the Middle East and Africa in order to achieve a one-world Western, yet Marxist, dominated government.
His logic is based on the fact that by securing Africa and the ME, Russia and China would have no choice but to go along with the West in terms of facilitating this one world government owned and operated by the Western Elite.
Statements have been made in the public domain that if Obama was not born in
That leads me to think that if that were true, then Obama has a Constitutional and state common law right to avoid further self-incrimination and to remain silent.
That could explain why he has neither talked publicly nor wants to talk in any court of law about where he was born.
But his right to remain silent would not extend to withholding his original Certificate of Live Birth.
Disclosure of documents is not testimonial (coming from a person's mouth) and his 5th Amendment and state common law right to remain silent and to not incriminate himself would not prevent such disclosure. This leads me to the main point.
Obama at present finds himself in a trilemma:
(1) Does he state publicly that he was born in Hawaii if he knows he was not and thereby "perjure" himself in the court of public opinion should the truth be eventually discovered? If he so swore under oath before Congress or any court of law, it would be actual perjury.
(2) Will he produce his original birth certificate which may show and will he tell the public the truth that he was not born in
(3) Does he remain silent as to where he was born and continue to refuse to release his original birth certificate and thereby earn the contempt of those in the public who believe that he has not convincingly proven that he is a "natural born Citizen" and eligible to be President? I submit that Obama has made the third choice.
The consequences for Obama are the least drastic and he gains the most benefits under the choice involving remaining silent and not producing his original birth certificate which is exactly what he has done to date.
There are at least two reasons for this:
(1) To date, no court of law has been willing to accept any case challenging his "natural born Citizen" status. The courts have dismissed law suits against him for reasons of jurisdiction, standing, political question, justiciability, and for reasons unknown.
These procedural obstacles have allowed him to escape having to defend the underlying merits of the claims against him which would necessarily involve his having to make declarations under oath as part of legal discovery and before the court itself in case of a trial.
He will simply continue to pursue this procedural strategy, as being so successful will allow him to maintain his silence and not produce his original birth certificate with the cost to him personally of only having to pay his team of lawyers.
This strategy explains why he is willing to spend enormous amounts of his own money and resources for his legal defense (maybe not even his own money if he can make a case that he can use his campaign contributions to meet the costs involved) and cause private individual plaintiffs and public institutions (courts and public entity defendants) to spend theirs with no end in sight.
This strategy also provides great impetus to the sales of his past and future books, thereby further filling up his coffers.
This strategy also explains why he is not willing to simply spend less than $100.00 and produce his original birth certificate for the benefit of those Americans who want to see it.
Lastly, this strategy provides an answer to the question of, assuming that Obama in the end simply produces his original birth certificate which shows he was born in
(2) Obama wants
(i) people who simply voted for him,
(ii) people who are apathetic to the eligibility issue or because of ignorance, fear, or self-ambition refuse to address it; and
(iii) people who in good faith believe he is eligible to be President (these categories may overlap), to believe that all the law suits and internet chatter questioning eligibility to be President is political sour grapes, racism, or "tinfoil hat" conspiracy nonsense.
These "explanations" for this outcry against him provide great camouflage for his silence and refusal to release his original birth certificate.
This strategy limits any contempt backlash to only those who oppose him on the eligibility issue and to no one else, thereby greatly reducing the price associated with the public contempt component.
The benefits Obama gains from stone-walling compared to the price he has to pay for complete disclosure makes the choice to refuse to speak about where he was born and to produce his original birth certificate most attractive for Obama.
The stakes are high in this game for the Office of President.
Obama has shown that he has the arrogance and audacity to play the game any which way he wants, simply to win that Office and greatly profit thereby.
The question for many concerned Americans who doubt whether he is eligible to be President is what they can do to get the nation’s political, legal, and social institutions to adequately and honestly investigate and decide whether he is indeed qualified to be President.
Obama’s strategy is now preventing these Americans from learning the truth about whether he is eligible to be President. The ball is in the court of those who challenge Him.
WARNING from South Africa, which has been there, done that.
"We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy - none of which are part of the Third World's history."
Some excerpts:
America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates.
But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.
But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change.
White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America.
Alan note: it's not just racism we face - reverse racism in the near future - but islamic jihad Mohammadenism, and imposition of sharia law to replace our Western ones. To which we increasingly bow and capitulate.
Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in.
They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.
The Third World is different - different peoples with different pasts and different cultures.
Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples.
Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe - once the thriving, stable Rhodesia - is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country.
Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.
Saturday, January 03, 2009
ANN D. OBAMA DIVORCE document
ALSO, IT APPEARS THAT A PORT OF ENTRY DOCUMENT DATED AT HIS BIRTH SHOWING ANN D. OBAMA ENTERED WITH HER SON, NEGATING HIS CLAIMED HAWAIIAN BIRTH HAS BEEN FOUND AND COPIED.
HOW DEMOCRATS SPIN FACTS TO HIDE REALITY
Judy Wallman, a professional genealogy researcher in southern California, was doing some personal work on her own family tree.
She discovered that Harry Reid's great-great uncle, Remus Reid, was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889. Both Judy and Harry Reid share this common ancestor.
The only known photograph of Remus shows him standing on the gallows in Montana territory.
On the back of the picture Judy obtained during her research is this inscription:
'Remus Reid, horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison 1885, escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times. Caught by Pinkerton detectives, convicted and hanged in 1889.'
So Judy e-mailed Senator Harry Reid for information about their great-great uncle.
Runs in the family?1. When his 38-caliber revolver failed to fire at his intended victim during a hold-up in Long Beach, California, would-be robber James Elliot did something that can only inspire wonder. He peered down the barrel and tried the trigger again. This time it worked. And now, the honorable mentions:
2. The chef at a hotel in Switzerland lost a finger in a meat-cutting machine and, after a little shopping around, submitted a claim to his insurance company. The company expecting negligence sent out one of its men to have a look for himself. He tried the machine and he also lost a finger. The chef's claim was approved.
3. A man who shoveled snow for an hour to clear a space for his car during a blizzard in Chicago returned with his vehicle to find a woman had taken the space.
4. After stopping for drinks at an illegal bar, a Zimbabwean bus driver found that the 20 mental patients he was supposed to be transporting from Sarare to Bulawayo had escaped.
Not wanting to admit his incompetence, the driver went to a nearby bus stop and offered everyone waiting there a free ride. He then delivered the passengers to the mental hospital, telling the staff that the patients were very excitable and prone to bizarre fantasies.
The deception wasn't discovered for 3 days.
5. An American teenager was in the hospital recovering from serious head sounds received from an oncoming train. When asked how he received the injuries, the lad told police that he was simply trying to see how close he could get his head to a moving train before he was hit.
6. A man walked into a Louisiana Circle-K, put a $20 bill on the counter, and asked for change. When the clerk opened the cash drawer, the man pulled a gun and asked for all the cash in the register, which the clerk promptly provided. The man took the cash from the clerk and fled, leaving the $20 bill on the counter. The total amount of cash he got from the drawer... $15. [If someone points a gun at you and gives you money, is a crime committed?]
7. Seems an Arkansas guy wanted some beer pretty badly. He decided that he'd just throw a cinder block through a liquor store window, grab some booze, and run. So he lifted the cinder block and heaved it over his head at the window. The cinder block bounced back and hit the would-be thief in the head, knocking him unconscious. The liquor store window was made of Plexiglas. The whole event was caught on videotape.
8. As a female shopper exited a New York convenience store, a man grabbed her purse and ran. The clerk called 911 immediately, and the woman was able to give them a detailed description of the snatcher. Within minutes, the police apprehended the snatcher. They put him in the car and drove back to the store. The thief was then taken out of the car and told to stand there for a positive ID. To which he replied, 'Yes, officer, that's her. that's the lady I stole the purse from.'
9. The Ann Arbour News crime column reported that a man walked into a Burger King in Ypsilanti , Michigan , at 5 A.M., flashed a gun, and demanded cash. The clerk turned him down because he said he couldn't open the cash register without a food order. When the man ordered onion rings, the clerk said they weren't available for breakfast. The man, frustrated, walked away. [*A 5-STAR STUPIDITY AWARD WINNER]
10. When a man attempted to siphon gasoline from a motor home parked on a Seattle street, he got much more than he bargained for.
Police arrived at the scene to find a very sick man curled up next to a motor home near spilled sewage.
A police spokesman said that the man admitted to trying to steal gasoline and plugged his siphon hose into the motor home's sewage tank by mistake.
The owner of the vehicle declined to press charges saying that it was the best laugh he'd ever had.
In the interest of bettering mankind, please share these with your friends and family... unless of course one of these individuals by chance is a distant relative or long-lost friend. In that case, be glad they are distant and hope they remain lost.
*** Remember... They walk among us!!! **
Friday, January 02, 2009
JUST THE BEAUTIFUL, AMAZING BLACK NOTES
COMPARE THIS TO THE RABBLE IN THE ARTICLE BELOW AND WEEP FOR WHAT OUR COUNTRY HAS STARTED TO BECOME.
WE CAME FROM SORROW BUT ARE HAVING A NEW, RUTHLESS THREAT AND SORROW IMPOSED ON US BY INVADERS IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING WHO OFFER US NO PART OF THEIR HEART OR HONOR.
THEY THINK OF ALL OF US AS SLAVES AND WISH TO INFLICT THEIR VIEWS OF WHICH SLAVERY IS A PART AND PARCEL TO ENSLAVE, EVEN KILL US, IF WE DARE TO DISOBEY THEIR DEITY.
PERHAPS THE PAIN TO BE FOUND IN THE "BLACK NOTES ONLY" PRESENTATION BELOW MAY REMIND US OF WHAT THESE INVADERS BRING AGAIN UPON US IN THE NAME OF THEIR PHILOSOPHY OF SUBJUGATED "PEACE".AND AS BLACK SLAVERY WAS REJECTED, LET US REJECT THE NEW ENSLAVERS OF OUR MINDS, OUR SOULS AND ACTIONS TO SUIT THEIR TASTES, NOT OUR TRADITIONAL ONES.
THEY DECIDED TO COME TO OUR SHORES TO LIVE, WE DID NOT INVITE THEM HERE TO RUIN OUR CHOSEN WAY OF LIFE.
DO YOU RECOGNIZE THIS AMERICA?
After reading the article above come back and view this video
Thursday, January 01, 2009
ISRAELI NUKES IN RANGE OF HAMAS (IRANIAN SUPPLIED) MISSILES?
2009 - BIRTH OF A NEW RELIGION
This smacks of the same brain wash job that the communists in China did with the children for Chairman Mao.
And that the Nazi's did for Adolf Hitler, and Tojo in Japan, and Stalin in the Soviet Union and Eddi Amen in Africa, Castro in Cuba, and, and, and, and This is the new relligion we have to look forward to folks.
15-pages on the new "messiah" already in some school books, similar songs probably in our schools starting January 2, 2009. There will probably be statues and huge photos being displayed in public places, as in Bagdad, before 2003!
GOOD GRIEF! IS THIS WHAT WE HAVE COME TO IN THE USA?
UNLESS: Phil Berg and several others can prevail on SCOTUS (Supreme Court) to DEFEND AND UPHOLD our Constitution!



















