Monday, March 31, 2008
The German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate.
Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now.
Whilst sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers and the passers-by and said melancholically: “We are watching the world of yesterday.”
Europe is turning Muslim.
As Broder is sixty years old he is not going to emigrate himself. “I am too old,” he said. However, he urged young people to get out and “move to Australia or New Zealand.
That is the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable.”
Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder’s advice. The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in.
One does not have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics.
The number of Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families.
Today Mohammed is already the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and other major European cities.
Broder is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. “The dominant ethos,” he told De Volkskrant, “is perfectly voiced by the stupid blonde woman author with whom I recently debated.
She said that it is sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious injuries while resisting. She said it is sometimes better to avoid fighting than run the risk of death.”
In a recent op-ed piece in the Brussels newspaper De Standaard the Dutch (gay and self-declared “humanist”) author Oscar Van den Boogaard refers to Broder’s interview. Van den Boogaard says that to him coping with the islamization of Europe is like “a process of mourning.”
He is overwhelmed by a “feeling of sadness.” “I am not a warrior,” he says, “but who is? I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it.”
As Tom Bethell wrote in this month’s American Spectator: “Just at the most basic level of demography the secular-humanist option is not working.”
But there is more to it than the fact that non-religious people tend not to have as many children as religious people, because many of them prefer to “enjoy” freedom rather than renounce it for the sake of children.
Secularists, it seems to me, are also less keen on fighting. Since they do not believe in an afterlife, this life is the only thing they have to lose. Hence they will rather accept submission than fight. Like the German feminist Broder referred to, they prefer to be raped than to resist.
“If faith collapses, civilization goes with it,” says Bethell. That is the real cause of the closing of civilization in Europe. Islamization is simply the consequence.
The very word Islam means “submission” and the secularists have submitted already. Many Europeans have already become Muslims, though they do not realize it or do not want to admit it.
Some of the people I meet in the U.S. are particularly worried about the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe. They are correct when they fear that anti-Semitism is also on the rise among non-immigrant Europeans. The latter hate people with a fighting spirit.
Contemporary anti-Semitism in Europe (at least when coming from native Europeans) is related to anti-Americanism.
People who are not prepared to resist and are eager to submit, hate others who do not want to submit and are prepared to fight. They hate them because they are afraid that the latter will endanger their lives as well. In their view everyone must submit.
This is why they have come to hate Israel and America so much, and the small band of European “islamophobes” who dare to talk about what they see happening around them.
West Europeans have to choose between submission (islam) or death. I fear, like Broder, that they have chosen submission – just like in former days when they preferred to be red rather than dead.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Accused Saddam Agent Says He Met With Hillary at White House
IRAQI’S MEETING WAS IN WHITE HOUSE IN 1996, HE CLAIMS
By IRA STOLL, STAFF REPORTER OF THE SUN March 27, 2008
A Michigan man facing federal criminal charges of illegally working for Saddam Hussein's Iraqi Intelligence Service says he met with Hillary Clinton at the White House in May 1996.
In a 1997 interview with this reporter, Muthanna Hanooti said that at the meeting, Mrs. Clinton was "very receptive" to his request for an easing of the American sanctions on Iraq that were in place at the time.
He said Mrs. Clinton "passed a message to the State Department" about the need to implement the oil-for-food deal, which was intended to allow Saddam to sell billions of dollars' worth of oil to pay for food for Iraqi citizens.
Back in 1997, a spokesman for the first lady referred inquiries about the meeting to the National Security Council. At the time, a spokesman for the National Security Council, Eric Rubin, responded by saying that President Clinton, not the first lady, sets foreign policy. (There go her claims of experience).
Asked whether Senator Clinton recalls the meeting or whether the presidential campaign had any further comment on the meeting in light of Mr. Hanooti's indictment, the Clinton presidential campaign yesterday offered no formal response.
White House schedules for Mrs. Clinton that were released earlier this month by the National Archives show a May 9, 1996, "Private Meeting w/ Congressman Bonior and Chaldean-Americans" in the Map Room.
David Bonior, who was a member of the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives until he stepped down in January 2003, backed Mr. Hanooti's efforts to ease the American blockade of Baathist Iraq.
Mr. Bonior has been back in the news this week for having been one of the congressmen on an October 2002 trip to Iraq that Mr. Hanooti organized and that, apparently unbeknownst to the congressmen, was paid for by Saddam's government. Chaldeans are Iraqi Christians.
For the Clinton campaign, already reeling from Mrs. Clinton's misstatement on another 1996 episode — a landing at an airport in Bosnia that she claimed took place under sniper fire — the indictment of Mr. Hanooti and the disclosure of his claim to have met with her could not have come at a worse time.
Mrs. Clinton has made her foreign policy experience in the White House an important part of her argument to voters that she is the only Democratic presidential candidate who would be ready to serve as president if the red phone rings at 3 a.m.
Mrs. Clinton and her defenders may claim that no one could have known in 1996 that Mr. Hanooti would become an agent of Saddam Hussein, engaged in what a grand jury and federal prosecutors say was a criminal conspiracy. The indictment charges that the conspiracy began "in or about 1999." Mr. Hanooti has pleaded not guilty.
But to reporters on the foreign policy beat in Washington at the time and to those active in the Iraqi opposition to Saddam, it was clear whose agenda was being advanced.
(NOTE: Al Qaeda representative in the Clinton White House, Huma Abedin, who is still the closest person to Hillary, was apparently there at the time and already influencing policy.)
The news article in 1997, published in the Forward, that described Mrs. Clinton's involvement with Mr. Hanooti began: "The American-led blockade of Iraq is crumbling, following an intensive, domestic lobbying effort that has involved Rep. David Bonior and Senator Abraham — and, according to some sources, Hillary Rodham Clinton."
QUESTION: Are the Democrats simply idiots when international danger and politics are involved OR are they aligned with our enemies? Bonior always reminded me of a silly Yorkshire Terrier (apologies to all the Yorkshire Terriers I have just insulted) but Hillary's Huma Abedin and the Billaries' communist tendencies, Russia and China at the top, made them our cloaked enemy, too. Some of you want AMERICA's "double enemy" back in the White House?
In the October 1997 interview, Mr. Hanooti identified himself as a Palestinian and said he had recently visited Iraq. He also said he had recently met with America's U.N. ambassador, Bill Richardson, to make the case against U.N. sanctions on Iraq.
"Of course we want the sanctions to be lifted, because we don't believe in it," Mr. Hanooti said. He added that the sanctions hurt the Iraqi people but do not affect the Iraqi regime.
When a reporter identified the Forward as a Jewish newspaper, Mr. Hanooti said, "It is interesting that our cousins are interested in this issue. We believe that part of the problem we have is their lobbying against lifting the sanctions."
Mr. Hanooti described the impact of the sanctions on Iraqis as "another Holocaust, like the one which happened to the Jews." He claimed that 1 million Iraqi children have died because of the lack of food and medical supplies there, and he said had raised the matter in the May 1996 meeting at the White House with Mrs. Clinton.
Mr. Hanooti's dealings with politicians reach beyond Mrs. Clinton. Federal Election Commission records show he donated to the campaigns of Mr. Bonior, of President Bush, and of Spencer Abraham, a Republican senator of Michigan who served as Mr. Bush's energy secretary.
A Republican familiar with the president's 2000 campaign said the compliance committee for the campaign had disbanded. Nonetheless, this official, requesting anonymity, said, "We are looking into this."
As a senator, Mrs. Clinton voted to authorize the Iraq war, but she has since stated both that she regretted the vote and that she thought it was a vote to allow more time for diplomacy and inspections by allowing the diplomacy to be backed by the threat of force.
She is campaigning for president on the theme of bringing the troops home from Iraq.
Both Democrat candidates have CLEAR links to Islamists, anti-American philosophies and left leaning mind sets verging on Marxism. You have to be even dumber than them to invite them to run your lives.
Even Al Gore is better and he has a bag full of flaws, like having invented the Internet!
"FITNA" - GEERT WILDERS' MOVIE ON ISLAM (BOTH PARTS) STILL VIEWABLE VIA MYPETJAWA LINK - CLICK ON THIS TITLE
Dutch Parliamentarian, Wilders, fed up by the danger posed by political Islam and Sharia law to the dormant, insouciant West made this documentary (here in two parts) to wake us up.
YOU OUT THERE! YES, YOU! Why do you continue to deny what the Koran preaches and its followers implement on a DAILY basis around the world? And have for centuries. Not as a religion but as a political "ism", an Islamic fascism. It is now reaching a neighborhood near you.
Is it because it is not what YOU would do so you cannot imagine someone else would? Despite the fact they do so all the time? Hey! Stupid! Wake up.
Or is it exactly what you would like to do and see happen?
Then, like it or not, YOU are the enemy - as an Islamist or as a "dhimmi" (fearful apologist for Islamic murder and violence and implementation of customs that disappeared as civilization progressed over the last 1,400 years).
Disappeared, except for inside Islam and its mullahs.
Even the Wilders documentary is watered down to deal with the sensitivities of our soft cultures.
Cutting off Armstrong's head can be seen in full on AntiMullah's Home Page.
Islamists Cutting Off Armstrong's Head In Full click here
Fearful of Islamic rioting - as in their protest for their Mohammad cartoons - Dutch TV stations have refused to air these videos.
AND if this were not enough, the UNITED NATIONS has ratified and Islamic Bill of Rights to REPLACE the Humanitarian Bill of Rights established some 50-years ago.
The new Bill of Human Rights has to follow ISLAMIC/Sharia tenets and forbids insult to Islam!
And you still graze peacefully like a placid cow while the wolves surround you?
WAKE UP!! (Just as you may be waking up to the anti-American hate spewing from preachers in our churches like Obama's or the one attended by HIllary Clinton for EIGHT years while she was in the White House, whose sermons were on a par with Wright's)
VIDEOS STILL VIEWABLE AT MYPETJAWA
BUT NOT AS ORIGINALLY LINKED - ENJOY AND SHARE WITH EVERYONE WHO HAVE YET TO SEE IT
Wilders Part One
Wilders Part Two
Friday, March 28, 2008
Monday, March 24, 2008
Sunday, March 23, 2008
HAPPY NOW RUZ
"Haft Seen - Seven items whose names in Persian start with the letter 's' are traditionally displayed as part of the Persian New Year". The picture below shows the 2008 'Haft Seen' at the White House.
HAPPY NOW RUZ (Persian New Year) click here
Saturday, March 22, 2008
As much by Hillary's burning desire for the top post as the presence of a Moslem who spent her childhood from the age of two till College age, in strictly Moslem Saudi Arabia. Whose mother wears a Moslem hejab. Whose family has deep-rooted ties to Al Qaeda (see link farther down).
AND the only other Democrat candidate, Obama, has worrying Moslem ties and has followed the guidance of a startling anti-American spiritual leader for over 20-years.
You may not like McCain - and many Conservative Republicans don't, but unless you want a "Moslem" next President of the USA, by influence if not directly by personal religion, then with those choices, McCain is a safer/BETTER bet on our future. Rather than Iran's or Iraq's or the fifty or so Moslem countries who use the United Nations to sabotage America.
Including voting out the Human Rights Declaration that had stood till now but a new declaration from them in Cairo states that Human Rights must conform to ISLAMIC human rights. Which means none at all - by our modern , Western standards
Still have doubts? Remember the best SOVIET president you voted into power - Jimmuh the iidiot Carter, who caused our country more pain than any other president. Including by far, as per avid Democrats, George Bush!
Huma Abedin the top confident and closest aide for Hillary Clinton is an assistant editor to an Islamic Journal called “Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs”
In fact the “Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs” and its “Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs” were founded by Huma Abedin father Syed Z. Abedin was a famous Islamic scholar but died when Huma was 17, and now both the Islamic institute and its journal are headed by her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin also known as Saleha S Mahmood a famous Islamic scholar and deputy dean of an Islamic school in Saudi Arabia called Dar Al-Hekma College for Women .
That is Huma mother in the picture shown in the link wearing the islamic Hijab.
According to the New York Observer Huma Abedin was born in Kalamazoo Michigan but her parents took her at the age of 2 to Saudi Arabia where Huma Abedin lived in Jeddah Saudi Arabia until her return to the US for college education.
From the New York Observer article on April 1 2007:
“The back story, as it were, begins 32 years ago in Kalamazoo, Mich., where Ms. Abedin, who declined to participate in this article, lived until the age of 2.
Her family then relocated to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where she lived until returning to the States for college.
She attended George Washington University. Her father, who died when she was 17, was an Islamic and Middle Eastern scholar of Indian decent. He founded his own institute devoted to Western-Eastern and interfaith understanding and reconciliation and published a journal focusing on Muslim minorities living in the diaspora.
Her mother, a renowned professor in Saudi Arabia, is Pakistani.”
Huma Abedin is not only an assistant for Hillary Clinton but she is her top confident, her secret weapon according to a quote from an aide to Hillary Clinton in the New York Observer article: “No one knows anything about her,” said one political aide. “She’s like Hillary’s secret weapon.”
In fact now we know something about Huma Abedin the top confident for Hillary Clinton, we know that she is an assistant editor of an Islamic journal headed by her Islamic scholar mother and founded by her Islamic scholar father.
More on Huma's family
More on Islam in a Christian environment
Hmmm, is that why Jewish convert to Islam Yousef al-Khattab (above) or Joey for short is blowing his top?
Robert Spencer's book "The Truth about Mohammed" has been out now for about sixteen months. When Hamas learned that free copies of the book would be distributed by the weekly "Human Events" newspaper they became enraged.
Hamas must fear that some of the followers of Islam might read it. Hey, free is free so why not?
Arutz Sheva Israel
The Al-Arabiya.net site reports that a right-wing U.S. newspaper, Human Events, plans to distribute free copies of a book by Robert Spencer, entitled The Truth About Muhammad:
Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion.
The Arab site's report, replete with innuendoes implying that the book is anti-Muslim, quotes British writer Karen Armstrong as stating that the book is "written in hatred," contains "basic and bad mistakes of fact," and that the author "deliberately manipulates the evidence."
The Hamas website responded with fury to the news of the book's dissemination, strongly attacking what it calls the "campaign by Western extremists against the religion of Islam and values that are sacred to Moslems."
The Hamas site states that the dissemination of Spencer's work is "another in a series of actions designed to distort the image of Islam in the public eye. This follows the re-publication of the Muhammad caricatures in Denmark and the intention of a Dutch Parliament Member to air a movie against Islam."
Spencer himself responded to the latest report with cynicism, writing, "Al-Arabiya discovers a sixteen-month-old promotion for my book The Truth About Muhammad, and the spittle starts flying.
As for the [sub-]headline of their piece [which reads: "Book is said to contain lies and hate"], I challenge anyone at Al-Arabiya, or anyone anywhere, to substantiate a single lie or hateful statement within the book."
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
OBAMA'S DOUBLE STANDARDS
He insisted Don Imus be fired for remarks that are mild compared to his Pastor Wright's recist vitriol.
Monday, March 17, 2008
Americans find this hard to believe and accuse Obama of condoning these attitudes if not agreeing with them.
Newt Gingrich Responds to Obama
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
GENEVA (Reuters) - Islamic states are bidding to use the United Nations to limit freedom of expression and belief around the world, the global humanist body IHEU told the U.N.'s Human Rights Council on Wednesday.
In a statement submitted to the 48-nation Council, the IHEU said the 57 members of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) were also aiming to undermine the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
"The Islamic states see human rights exclusively in Islamic terms, and by sheer weight of numbers this view is becoming dominant within the U.N. system. The implications for the universality of human rights are ominous," it said.
The statement from the IHEU, the International Humanist and Ethical Union, was issued as the U.N.'s special investigator on freedom of opinion and expression argued in a report that religions had no special protection under human rights law.
Ambeyi Ligabo, a Kenyan jurist, said in a report to the Council limitations on freedom of expression in international rights pacts "are not designed to protect belief systems from external or internal criticism."
But this argument is rejected by Islamic states, who say outright criticism -- and especially lampooning -- of religion violates the rights of believers to enjoy respect. The IHEU statement and Ligabo's report came against the background of mounting success by the OIC, currently holding a summit in Dakar, in achieving passage of U.N. resolutions against "defamation of religions."
Although several such resolutions have been adopted by the two-year-old Council and its predecessor since 1999, in December the U.N.'s General Assembly easily passed a similar one for the first time over mainly Western and Latin American opposition.
The OIC -- backed by allies in Africa and by Russia and Cuba -- has been pushing for stronger resolutions on "defamation" since a global controversy arose two years ago over cartoons in a Danish newspaper which Muslims say insult their religion.
The "defamation" issue has become especially sensitive this year as the U.N. prepares to celebrate in the autumn the 50th anniversary of the 1948 Universal Declaration, long seen as the bedrock of international human rights law and practice.
The OIC has been actively promoting its own 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam, which it argues is complementary to the Universal Declaration but which critics like the IHEU say negate it in many areas.
Humanists, who include believers of many faiths supporting separation of religion and state as well as atheists and agnostics, say the "defamation" drive is part of an effort to extend the Cairo declaration to the international sphere.
The IHEU statement argued the December General Assembly resolution means states "may now legislate against any show of disrespect for religion, however they may ALSO choose to define 'disrespect'."
In response to demands from three Egyptian Muftis, the United Nations is drafting a resolution that would require member nations to ban religious insults. The insults covered under this ban include the publication of any images or words offensive to “recognized religious authorities.”
Alan Note: REMEMBER any religion other than Islam (as declared below) has NO right to claim being insulted!!!!
Examples of the kinds of insults covered were expounded upon by Mufti Mahranik Faoul. “The Danish cartoons of Muhammed (may peace be upon him) were an insult,” Faoul said. “The Geert Wilders film is an insult. Any words spoken by a Jew are an insult.”
Faoul rebuffed assertions that Islamic nations do their share of insulting other religions.
“There is no God but Allah,” Faoul declared. “Any so-called religion that does not recognize this fact has no authority to claim it has been insulted.
These are not genuine religions. They (religions other than Islam) are the lies of the infidels.”
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Farda News is a website said to be close to the mayor of Tehran and former chief of the police forces, Mohammed Bagher Qalibaf.
Following the raid, Zarei stepped down from his post as police chief. The news of his arrest however was not reported by any official Iranian news agency.
According to a popular Iranian website Gooya, the order to raid the brothel was given directly by Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, chief of the judicial authorities.
Before he was arrested, Zarei was in charge of the programme for the 'moralisation of the city'.
Alan Note: the Colonel who is Chief of Police Precinct 8 (Baharestan Square (?), names have changed) is a known rapist of any woman that ends up in his precinct. Even those who seek shelter and protection there. He invites them to spend the night under police protection then rapes them. With Impunity!
To whom are they going to complain? His boss? The one who just got caught in a brothel? There is no protection FROM the agents of the "law" authorities in Iran.
The Shah's Tehran Police Chief, a position held by Gen. Mehdi Rahimi at the time of the Khomeini revolution was administered by one of the bravest and most honorable of the Shah's officers.
And among the first to be killed by the brutal revolutionary courts under the "killer cleric judge" ayatollah Khalkhali, who enjoyed torturing cats to hear their shrieking screams of pain.
Reports relate that he died with his body infested by worms (not intestinal but parasitic all over his skin and muscles). He deserved an even more horrific, painful, nasty demise.
When Khalkhali insulted the Shah to Gen. Rehimi, this officer fearlessly slapped Khalkhali hard in the face. And had his hands and arms cut off as punishement before being executed.
Photos of Gen. Rahimi's body show his arm placed on his chest.
Ibrahim Yazdi, USA trained, British agent, cut off the late General Mehdi Rahimi's arms before executing him.
In the picture above the late General's amputated left arm is resting on his body. (Notice that the general's left wrist is missing from his left arm).
His amputated right arm is resting alongside his body. (Notice the lower part of his right hand is also missing).
For more pictures and facts about the Shah's executed Generals and others visit HOLY CRIMES and use the links at the left to browse the horrors of the Mullahs.
WARNING not pretty.
Alan Note: Jimmuh the mealy-mouth, idiot Carter has the blood of THOUSANDS of HONORABLE innocents in Iran DIRECTLY on his hands for 1979 and since then almost a million others killed by his mindless support of Khomeini and dethroning the Shah on Soviet prompting.
God save the world from any more Democrat Presidents and the blight they bring.
Clinton failed to deal with terrorism and gave the Chinese the ability to guide their nuclear ballistic missile right on target onto the USA, so now voting his wife (and him) back into the White House makes those voters naive (to be polite).
Ayatollah Khalkhali got his wormy karmic come-uppance for his brutality, What will be Carter's for the blood he spilled? His Humana homes cannot wash his hands clean.
Monday, March 10, 2008
For everyone's information, during the Mossadegh period of being in power, and to correct the revisionist history provided by the pro-Mossadegh lobbies, supported by the Tudeh (Iranian Communist party) there was a time when a major city like Mashhad had virtually every household receive a flyer - that it was now part of Iranistan and the Soviet 17th District.
Also remember that Mossadegh was a member of the former , inept, Qajar dynasty and had a personal family gripe against the Pahlavis that had nothing to do with nationalism. He wanted his family back in power and was thirsty for acclaim.
This bilingual analysis clarifies much of the disinformation put out by the Socialist and Marxist left who failed to come to power via Mossadegh and then again via the Mullahs in 1979.
آنچه در زير می آيد نوشته يک غير ايرانی است در مورد اثرات رستاخير 1953 و اگر مصدق سرنگون نشده بود. بسيار، بسيار از نويسنده و کسی که اين مطلب را فرستاده سپاسگزارم.
ترجمه از من است تا آنانی که هنوز گوشيهايشان پنبه دارد و کسانی که هنوز مصدق را قهرمان می دانند و محمد رضا را يک خائن بدانند چقدر اشتباه می کنند.
اين روز هاکه رژيم باهمکاری حزب توده و جبهه ملی مشغول برگزاری مراسمی در احمد آباد است نوشته شدن چنين مطلبی از سوی يک غير ايرانی بسيار معنی دار است.
اگر ايميل اين شخص را داريد بدهيد از او سپاسگزاری کنيم.
او براستی حقيت داستان را نوشته است.
March 3, 2008
What if Mosadegh Had Remained in power in Iran, in 1953?
چطور ميشد اگر مصدق در سال 1953 در قدرت باقی می ماند؟؟
By: Jack Power
There are so many misconception about the event leading to the overthrew of the ineffective & dysfunctional government of Dr. Mosadegh in Iran in 1953. It all comes from the hate that the British had against His Late Majesty the Shah of Iran, that they wanted to destroy everything that had any relationship with the Shah.
(Alan note: mostly because his father, Reza Shah, as an Aryan himself had (though officially neutral) unofficially misaligned himself with Germany and had been deposed by the British and sent into exile to South Africa).
Of course the British want to keep the irresponsible Mullahs in power for as long as there are Iranians willing to pump oil into the British tankers while turning off the oil meters so nothing gets recorded.
بسيار گمانه زنی های نادرستی در باره اتفاق هائی که به سرنگون کردن دولت بی اثر و بدون کارآئی دکتر مصدق در سال 1953 منتهی شد وجود دارد. تمام اين ها به نفرتی برميگردد که دولت انگلستان از شاه ايران داشت، آنها می خواستند همه چيز نابود شود، به هرچيزی که به هرترتيب ارتباطی با شاه داشت.
مسلم است که بريتانيا تلاش دارد و مايل است ملايان بدون مسئوليت را تا آنجائی که نفت را به سوی تانکر های بريتانيا پمپاژ می کنند، در قدرت نگاه دارد حتا تا بدانجا که کنتر ها را خاموش می کنند تا اثری از اين کار باقی نماند.
The Shah fought hard until his last days in office to protect the Iranian interest from the greedy external powers mainly the British. It is because of these obvious reasons that the campaign against the Shah began in earnest in the late 60's and the early 70's.
The Shah's radical modernizing reforms including the emancipation of women, workers right, the land reforms, health and educational reforms would find their way in the British or American press.
The British with help of their propaganda specialists in the press including the BBC started a systematic and tireless attack on the Shah of Iran. But even after the overthrew of the late Shah in 1979, the British never missed a chance to trash the image of the Shah.
شاه تا زمانی که حضور داشت با اين مورد جنگيد و منافع ايرانيان را از دسترس قدرت های بيرونی آزمند و طماع وحريص، به ويژه بريتانيا دور نگاه داشت. به شهادت همين دلايل روشن لشکر کشی مبارزاتی عليه شاه از پايان سال های 60 تا ده 70 آغاز شد. هيچ يک از رفرم های ريشه دار و بنيانی شاه از جمله آزاد سازی و دادن اعتبار به بانوان، حقوق کارگران و اصلاحات ارضی، بهداشت، و تحولات آموزشی رضايت بريتانيا و آمريکا را جلب کرد. بريتانيا با استفاده از ابزار پروپاگاندا و متخصصين اين امر از جمله بی بی سی يک سری حملات خستگی نا پذير مداوم و سيستماتيک را برعليه شاه ايران آغاز کردند. اما اين کار حتا پس از برکنار کردن شاه در سال 1970 متوقف نشده است، بريتانيا هرگز شانس خود را برای لکه دار کردن و بی ارزش کردن شاه کنارنگذاشته است.
The misinformation and the re-writing of history has been the expertise of the British in the past.
In the case of Iran it is difficult to understand that many in America fall in to the British trap.
Many people including Mosadegh supporters don't know many facts about Mossadegh's short terms in office. While Mossadegh was in power he was leading the country into bankruptcy.
All government employees salaries were 3 months behind. Oil production and income came to ZERO. Unemployment reached astronomical numbers.
(Alan note: Continued Qajar ineptitude)
دادن آگاهی های نادرست، و دوباره نويسی تاريخ جزو تخصص های ويژه انگلستان در گذشته بوده است. در مورد ايران اين امر بسيارمشکل می نمايد زيرا بسياری از آمريکائيان در تله بريتانيا می افتند.
بسياری از مردم به ويزه پشتيبانان مصدق حقايق و امور واقعی دوران کوتاه مصدق را نمی فهمند. درحاليکه مصدق در قدرت بود با تمام قوا کشور را به سوی ورشکستگی می برد. هيچ يک از کارمندان دولت برای مدت سه ماه حقوق دريافت نکرده بودند. توليد نفت و درآمد آن به صفر رسيده بود. بيکاری به عدد نجومی رسيده بود.
The key point is that if he had stayed in power, and if August the 17th, 1953, had not happened, Iranians would be living in communist Iran today and 2/3 of the world would have been communist by now, and their lives as well as our lives would have been disastrous.
THE WHOLE WORLD (although 99% don't even know who Mossadegh was) should celebrate his fall from power, and world freedom today is owed to the popular national uprising of the 1953 in Iran. But unfortunately this is not written
in any history books and the world has never talked about it.
پرسش کليدی در اينجااست که اگر در قدرت باقی مانده بود و اگر وقايع 17 آگوست 1953 رخ نداده بود، ايرانيان در يک کشور کومونيست زندگی می کردند و دو سوم جهان امروز کومونيست بود، و زندگی آنان و همچنين زندگی ما در يک آشفتگی و پر بلا بود. تمام جهان (گرچه 99% از اصلا نمی دانند مصدق کيست) بايستی سقوط مصدق را جشن بگيرند و آزادی جهان امروز خود را مديون رستاخيز ملی 1953 در ايران بداند. اما شوربختانه اين مورد در هيچ کتاب تاريخی نوشته نشده است و جهان هرگز در مورد آن سخن نگفته است.
The Americans know very well that Jimmy Carter was the worst president ever. By betraying the Shah of Iran and replacing him with Khomeini, he betrayed America's principles as well as damaging the US image around the world.
Jimmy Carter being a dishonest knave or a fool, instead of kissing The Shah's feet, he did what he did to him. Here is the reason behind it:
آمريکائی ها بخوبی ميدانند که جيمی کارتر بدترين رئيس جمهورشان بود. او باخيانت به شاه ايران و جايگزين کردن او با خمينی، به تمام ارزش های آمريکا خيانت کرد چهره آمريکا رادر اطراف جهان صدمه زد. جيمی کارتر بعنوان يک ديوانه فرومايه و نادرست بجای بوسيدن پا های شاه او به کاری دست زد که امروز نتيجه اش حاصل شده است.
Contrary to what the majority of uniformed people think Mossadegh was not a popular person at all.
Iranians were divided between 2 groups. Supporters of Tudeh Party (the Communist part backed by USSR in Iran) and the Monarchy. Mossadegh supporters were far fewer than either or both these groups.
Mossadegh was not a party or a front by itself. Support for him was minimal among ordinary people. He was simply another Prime Minister appointed by the Shah.
برخلاف آنچه اکثريت نا آگاه فکر می کنند به هيچوجه مصدق يک فرد محبوب نبود. ايرانيان به دوگروه تقسيم می شوند. طرفداران حزب توده (حزبی کومونيستی که در ايران است و روسيه آنرا پشتيبانی می کند) و طرفداران نظام پادشاهی. تعداد طرفداران مصدق بسيار ناچيز تر از اين دو گروه است. مصدق هرگز نه خود يک حزب بود و نه بخودی خود جبهه بود. طرفداران او تعدادشان در ميان مردم بسيار کم است. او فقط يک نخست وزير بود که از سوی شاه به نخست وزيری گمارده شده بود.
So since he was weak, with not too many supporters and the country was almost bankrupt, the Tudeh Party took advantage of his weakness, lent their support to him while waiting for the right moment to attack him.
Because Tudeh was the strongest, they would have taken over Iran in the matter weeks if Mossadegh had succeeded in his coup against the sovereign monarch two days earlier.
بنا براين چون او يک فرد ضعيفی بود، و طرفداران زيادی نداشت و کشور تقريبا به حال ورشکستگی رسيده بود، حزب توده از وضعيت ضعف او سوء استفاده کرده و طرفداران خود را به او قرض دادند و منتظر شدند تا زمان مناسب فرا برسد و به او حمله کنند. برای اينکه حزب توده قوی تر بود، اگر مصدق دو روز پيش و در کودتای خود برعليه شاه قانونی پيروز شده بود حزب توده در ظرف يک هفته ايران را در اختيار می گرفت.
Soviet backed Tudeh had penetrated and controlled major parts of the media, the news papers, labour groups, military, the Iranian Oil Company, factories, and even the farmers.
A large number of of senators, and the parliament Majlis representatives, and many generals in the army were followers of Tudeh Party.
Tudeh had penetrated into every governmental organization and ministry at the highest levels as well as the universities, teachers, etc. So they would have taken over the army and with the help of their supporters and media they would have overthrown the weak and bankrupt government of Mossadegh in a matter of weeks after the Shah left.
(Alan note: Putin's 'still soviet' Russia again has about 50,000 embedded Russian consultants in Islamic Iran - with at least one in every government office. They send about $100 MILLION a month to their families back home to Russia.
Therefore would have turned Iran into a Communist state.
توده در بيشتر رسانه ها گروهی و در بخش های کنترل کننده مثل روزنامه ها، گروه های کارگیر، ارتش، کارکنان نفت، کارخانه ها، و حتا بين کشاورزان نفوذ پيدا کرده بود. بسياری از سناتور ها، نمايندگان مجلس، و بسياری از ژنرال های ارتش طرفدار حزب توده شده بودند. توده در ارگان های اداری نفوذ کرده بود، در وزارت خانه ها در سطح بالائی همچنين در دانشگاه، بين آموزگاران و غيره نفوذ داشت. بنا براين براحتی قادر بودند در ظرف يک هفته ارتش را با پشتيبانی هائی که در رسانه های گروهی داشتند در زمانی که شاه کشور را ترک کرده بود در سرنگون کرده و در سرنگونی دولت ضعيف و ورشکسته موثر واقع شوند. بنابراين ايران به يک کشور کومونيست مبدل می شد.
Nicholai Loverntiev who was the Russian ambassador in Iran in 1953, was instructed to do everything in his power to make sure that the anti- Shah coup by Mossadegh will be a success or else there would be no job for him in Russia.
(As in 1978/79 the Soviet Embassy was the center of the Islamist-Marxist revolution, snatched from them by Khomeini with Jimmy Carter's support)
As Mossadegh's coup was foiled, Nocholai Loverntiev thought that his only choice was to commit suicide.
نيکلای لورنتيف که در سال 1953 در ايران سفير بود، ماموريت داشت تا هرچه در قدرت دارد بکار بندد و خاطر جمع شود تا کودتای طراحی شده مصدق بر عليه شاه به نتيجه برسد و در غير اين صورت شغل ديگری برای او در روسيه وجود نخواهد داشت. چون کودتای مصدق شکست خورد، نيکلاز لورنتيف گمان کرد انتخاب ديگری ندارد جز اينکه دست به خودکشی بزند.
Now, remember that the basic reason that the Soviet Union was dissolved was financial bankruptcy.
The Soviet Union was strong socially, politically, and militarily.
The only reason that the central Soviet government gave up as the former Russian President Gorbachove said was: "WE CAN NO LONGER SUPPORT OUR PROVINCES, AND WE ARE FINANCIALLY BANKRUPT".
در اين هنگام، بايد بخاطر داشت که تنها دليلی که موجب سرنگونی اتحاد جماهير شوروی شد ورشکستی اقتصادی بود. جماهير شوروی به شدت وابسته به سوسياليسم، سياسيون و ارتش بود. تنها دليلی که باعث شد حکومت مرکزی روسيه دست بشويد اين بود که رئيس جمهور روسيه گرباچف گفت" « ما ديگر قادر به حمايت از ايالات خود نيستيم، و ما از نظر اقتصادی ورشکسته شده ايم»
If Tudeh had came to power in Iran, the Soviets would have reached the Persian Gulf oil in no time and it would have brought them tens of billions of dollars a year in oil profits.
The whole plan for the Soviets, as the late Shah said it many times, was to reach and take over the oil in the Persian gulf.
So if the Soviets had won in Iran through Tudeh party, they would have never gone bankrupt, and the Soviets would have stayed in power stronger than ever before, feeding their evil empire through the income from Iran's oil.
You, me and most of the civilized world would have been living in cold war conditions or under Communism. That is if the World War III would not have broken out as result of such changes in Iran in 1953.
اگر حزب توده در ايران به قدرت می رسيد، اتحاد جماهير شوروی درمدت بسيار کمی به آبهای گرم خليج پارس و نفت دسترسی پيدا ميکردو از محل فروش نفت بيليون ها دلار برای آنها سرمايه بدست می داد. تمام نقشه ای که از سوی شوروی کشيده شده بود؛ همانطور که شاه بارها درپيام های خود گفته بود، اين بود که به خليج پارس و نفت دسترسی پيدا کند. اگر روسيه از طريق حزب توده به ايران دست ميافت هرگز ورشکست نمی شد و اتحاد جماهير شوروی بر سرکار می ماند و قوی تر می شد وبيشتر از هميشه امپراتوری شيطانی خود را از طريق نفت ايران گسترده می کد. من و شما که در يک دنيای متمدن زندگی می کنيم در آن صورت در زير يک حکومت کومونيستی زندگی می کرديم. اين درصورتی بود که جنگ جهانی سوم به دنبال تغييرات در سال 1953 آغاز نشده بود.
This is what the late Shah was all about. He dedicated 37 years of his life fighting Communists so Iran would not fall in to their hands, so the oil could remain in the hands of Iranians and the world would stay free. God bless his soul, and damn Carter.
اين چيزی است که شاه هم معتقد بود. او 37 سال عمر شيرين خود را برای مبارزه با کومونيسم بسر برد تا ايران بدست آنها نيافتند، تا نفت در دستان ايرانيان و در اختيار جهان آزاد باقی بماند. روحش آمرزيده باد.
We must not forget the dedication and sacrifices of Iran's security and intelligence organisation (SAVAK) in this fight and God bless every devoted officer of that organisation who were determined to keep Iran a Communist free state.
Amongst them were the late General Hashemi who headed the 8th division of Savak (the anti-Soviet Dept) and Mr. Parviz Sabeti who headed the 2nd division (the domestic security Dept). The dedicated officers of Savak are amongst Iran's unsung heroes, they did so much to protect Iran from its enemies.
(On occasion over-zealously but fully supporting the interests of the nation and thye West)
نبايستی فداکاری و از خود گذشتگی ايران را در برقراری امنيت به مديريت سازمان امنيت (ساواک) را در اين مبارزه بی امان فراموش کنيم، خدا همه افسران آن سازمان را که مصمم بودند ايران را از گزند کومونيسم محفوظ دارند بيامرزد. در ميان آن ها ژنرال هاشمی که در راس اداره هشتم ساواک بود (ضد اتحاد شوروی) و آقای پرويز ثابتی که در راس اداره دوم بود (اداره امنيت داخلی) را می توان نام برد. افسران فداکار ساواک در ميان قهرمانان بی نام و فراموش شده ايران می مانند، آنها هرچه در قدرت داشتند برای حفظ ايران از دشمن کوشيدند.
Thanks to the popular counter coup of the Iranian people in August 17, 1953, and the continuation of the Pahlavis, the late Shah instigated many great reforms in such short time.
I don't know if this is a true story or not, but before the revolution I heard that during an interview with His Late Majesty in an answer to a reporter who asked "why don't you rule like the king of Sweden? the late Shah answered "when people of Iran can think like Swedish people, I will rule like the Swedish king".
This is so true. The Shah knew exactly what the psychology of Iranians was, how they think, and how much freedom and democracy they can handle. The Shah gave them exactly what was fit for them.
Absolute religious, economical, and social freedom like no where else in the world. But limited political freedom, so foreign powers cannot abuse them, and so the Iranians don't hang themselves with it, as they did in February 1979.
(Just the way Europe and the USA are hanging themselves with their handling of a Mohammaden attack according to democratic rules that are being used against them by a totally dictatorial political Islam).
سپاس به ضد کودتائی که از سوی مردم در 17 آگوست 1953 فراهم آمدو منجر به ادامه زندگی پهلوی ها شد، شاه در مدت کوتاهی بنيان گذار و مبتکر بسياری از اصلاحات و رفرم ها بود. من نميدانم اين داستان درست است يا نه، ولی پيش از انقلاب در يکی از گفتگو هابا اعيليحضرت شاهنشاه به خبرنگاری که پرسيده بود "چرا شما مثل پادشاه سوئد رفتار نمی کنيد" شاه پاسخ داده بود «هنگاميکه مردم ايران مثل مردم سوئد فکرکنند، همان موقعه است که من مثل پادشاه سوئد رفتار کنم» اين يک حقيقت است. شاه بدرستی می داند که روانشناسی مردم ايران چيست؛ چطور فکر می کنند و چگونه و چقدر آزادی و دموکراسی را می توانند تحمل کنند. شاه به آنها چيزی را داده بود که می توانستند خود را در قالب آن جای دهند. آزادی مذهب، اقتصاد، آزادی اجتماعی همانطور که در جاهای ديگر جهان بود، اما محدود به آزادی سياسی تا جائيکه قدرت های بيگانه نتوانند آنان را مورد هجوم قرار دهند و ايرانيان خود را با آن حلق آويز کنند، همانطور که در فرويه سال 1979 کردند.
A popular revolt by the people. The bazaris, government employees, officers of the army, the clergies as well as ordinary men & women, pour into the streets demanding Mossadegh's downfall and return of the young Shah.
رستاخير مردمی. بازاری، کارمندان دولت، افسران ارتش، مذهبيون و همچنين مردم عادی
زنان و مردان فقير در خيابان ها خواهان سرنگونی مصدق و بازگشت شاه هستند.
Mossadegh was arrested, found guilty of treason in a public court. The Shah pardoned him and his fellow conspirators. He spent the rest of his life free on the condition that he would never engage in such crimes against state.
In other countries and a different Head of State than the Shah, Mossadegh would have faced the death sentence or life behind bars.
مصدق دستگير شده و دردادگاه همگانی محکوم شد. شاه اوو ديگر توطئه گران همراهش را بخشيد.
او بقيه عمرش را آزاد زندگی کرد بشرط اينکه هرگز در يک چنين خيانتی بر ضد مردم شرکت نکند.
مصدق در کشور های ديگر با اعدام روبرو می شد ويا می بايست پشت ميله های زندان باشد.