Wednesday, April 21, 2010
SORRY KID! CALL THE WHITE HOUSE
John G. Is 63 years old and owns a small business. He's a life-long Republican and sees his dream of retiring next year has all but evaporated. With the stock market crashing and new taxes coming his way, John assumes now that he will work to his dying day.
John has a granddaughter.. Ashley is a recent college grad. She drives a flashy hybrid car, wears all the latest fashions, and loves to go out to nightclubs and restaurants. Ashley campaigned hard for Barack Obama. After the election she made sure her grandfather (and all other Republican family members) received a big I told-you-so earful on how the world is going to be a much better place now that her party is taking over.
Having lost both roommates, Ashley recently ran short of cash and cannot pay the rent (again) on her 3 bedroom townhouse.. Like she has done many times in the past, she e-mailed her grandfather asking for some financial help.
Here is his reply:
Sweetheart, I received your request for assistance.
Ashley, you know I love you dearly and I 'm sympathetic to your financial plight. Unfortunately, times have changed. With the election of President Obama, your grandmother and I have had to set forth a bold new economic plan of our own..."The Ashley Economic Empowerment Plan." Let me explain.
Your grandmother and I are life-long, wage-earning tax payers. We have lived a comfortable life, as you know, but we have never had the fancier things like European vacations, luxury cars, etc.. We have worked hard and were looking forward to retiring soon. But the plan has changed. Your president is raising our personal and business taxes significantly. He says it is so he can give our hard earned money to other people. Do you know what this means, Ashley? It means less for us, and we must cut back on many business and personal expenses.
You know the wonderful receptionist who worked in my office for more than 23 years? The one who always gave you candy when you came over to visit? I had to let her go last week. I can't afford to pay her salary and all of the government mandated taxes that go with having employees. Your grandmother will now work 4 days a week to answer phones, take orders and handle the books. We will be closed on Fridays and will lose even more income to the Wal-Mart.
I'm also very sorry to report that your cousin Frank will no longer be working summers in the warehouse. I called him at school this morning.. He already knows about it and he's upset because he will have to give up skydiving and his yearly trip to Greenland to survey the polar bears.
That's just the business side of things. Some personal economic effects of Obama's new taxation policies include none other than you You know very well that over the years your grandmother and I have given you thousands of dollars in cash, tuition assistance, food, housing, clothing, gifts, etc.., etc. But by your vote, you have chosen to help others -- not at your expense -- but at our expense.
If you need money now sweetheart, I recommend you call 202-456-1111. That is the direct phone number for the White House.. You can also contact the White House here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/ .
You yourself told me how foolish it is to vote Republican. You said Mr Obama is going to be the People's President, and is going to help every American live a better life. Based on everything you've told me, along with all the promises we heard during the campaign, I'm sure Mr. Obama will be happy to transfer some stimulus money into your bank account. Have him call me for the account number which I memorized years ago..
Perhaps you can now understand what I've been saying all my life: those who vote for a president should consider the impact on the nation as a whole, and not be just concerned with what they can get for themselves. What Obama supporters don't seem to realize is all of the money he is redistributing to illegal aliens and non-taxpaying Americans (the so-called "less fortunate") comes from tax-paying families.
Remember how you told me, "Only the richest of the rich will be affected"? Well guess what, honey? Because we own a business, your grandmother and I are now considered to be the richest of the rich. On paper, it might look that way, but in the real world, we are far from it.
As you said while campaigning for Obama, some people will have to carry more of the burden so all of America can prosper.. You understand what that means, right? It means that raising taxes on productive people results in them having less money; less money for everything, including granddaughters.
I'm sorry, Ashley, but the well has run dry.. The free lunches are over.. I have no money to give you now. So, congratulations on your choice for "change." For future reference, I encourage you to try and add up the total value of the gifts and cash you have received from us, just since you went off to college, and compare it to what you expect to get from Mr. Obama over the next 4 (or 8) years. I have not kept track of it, Ashley. It has all truly been the gift of our hearts.
Remember, we love you dearly....but from now on you'll need to call the number mentioned above. Your "Savior" has the money we would have given to you. Just try and get it from him.
Good luck, sweetheart.
Love, Grandpa
(UPDATED COMMENTS) ARIZONA WANTS TO KNOW - IS OBAMA ILLEGALLY IN THE WHITE HOUSE ?
ARROGANTLY RUDE TO CANADIAN LEADER HARPER
EVEN MORE SO WITH ISRAEL'S NETANYAHU
OBSEQUIOUS WITH THE CHINESE LEADER
(NOTE THE SHADOW - HIS BOW AND RAMROD STRAIGHT STANCE OF THE CHINAMAN IN RETURN)
As Oba-Hussein messes up the USA financially and morally, as he messes up our foreign policy, as he bows deferentially to other Heads of State, as he IMPOSES his Marxist-Islamic concepts on us against the will of the plurality fo the people, in contravention of our Constitution, which he shreds with disdain, as he disrespects our allies and supports our enemies, his eligibity rises closer and closer to the top of many American minds as an escape from this Chicago style thug and his equally thuggish Senate and Congressional leaders, who trample on "we the people" in a flagrant abuse of power.
HIs choice of "czars" with whom he surrounds himself and "rules" speaks volumes about who he is and how he thinks.
Passing major legislation by brute force without having even read it, says it all about all of them!
20 STATES HAVE ALREADY FILED SUIT AGAINST THIS DESTRUCTIVE SHAM BY DEMOCRATS
20 STATES HAVE ALREADY FILED SUIT AGAINST THIS DESTRUCTIVE SHAM BY DEMOCRATS
How 'bout that Arizona legislature? Demonstrating that the best political myths have half lives that rival some radioactive isotopes, the state House of Representatives advanced legislation that would require future presidential candidates -- say, Barack Obama in 2012 -- to prove that they are citizens before their names can appear on the state's ballot.
The proposal, which must still be considered by the state Senate, would require national political parties to submit "documents that prove that the candidate is a natural-born citizen, prove the candidate's age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for president of the United States as prescribed in Article II, Section 1, Constitution of the United States."
It goes on to give the Arizona secretary of state the discretion to keep a candidate's name off the ballot if he or she has "reasonable cause" to believe the candidate doesn't meet those requirements.
Monday, April 19, 2010
FROM THE MOUTH OF ISLAMISTS
Chilling video produced by a Muslim group called Revolution Muslim (http://www.revolutionmuslim.com/ ) in which they argue that death is an appropriate response for any who blaspheme Mohammed by the written or spoken word. Shows pictures of Stone and Parker of South Park, Theo Van Gogh, and other "blasphemers." Includes the line "It is clear that the harming of Allah and his messenger by poetry and defamation, the blood of such a person is not protected by any means."
Sunday, April 18, 2010
THE OBA-HUSSEIN WE DO NOT KNOW
IN CASE THE VIDEO DOES NOT COME UP TRY THIS LINK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1_jZnNT9e8&feature=digest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1_jZnNT9e8&feature=digest
Friday, April 16, 2010
LIONESSES OF IRAN
A relatively new organization "shir zanaan-eh Iran" = Lionesses of Iran has formed to help and guide Iran's browbeaten, suppressed and oppressed women in the face of the horrible servitude itno which they find themselves thrown - as are may of their children.
Divorce in the Mullah regime is a matter of throwing the woman out of the house with a thrice stated "I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you" and her belongings thrown into the street behind her! NO! This is not an exaggeration.
Meanwhile the husband dotes on his new young wife,who replaced her. Or on his third or fourth wife he has introduced into his home to pleasure and serve him.
Just the capital city of Tehran has over 300,000 homeless street women who have nowhere to go, no jobs and join some 700,000 homeless children who also live on the streets.
Orphanages that existed under the late Shah were all closed down decades ago as a useless expense.
The Lionesses are an activist/feminist group which wants to return some power to Irfan's women, who traditionally have been the "power behind the throne" but are now abused sex objects/property of the husband.
One directive the Lionesses are suggesting to frighten Iranian men into behaving in a more "civilized" fashion is to suggest that if the husband decides to take a second or third or fourth wife or abuses his first wife, for her/them to boil a large pan of water and pour it on his genitals when he is asleep.
They propose that this only be done if the pouring person/team has somewhere to which to flee as retribution, including a severe beating or even being killed could follow this act.
However, the uncivilized husband will either remember the lesson for life or even bephysically "emasculated" forever.
The Lionesses are gathering funds/donstions and offering shelter and living costs inside Iran to women who fight back in this way and are structuring helping them out of Iran and into host countries, which will give them amnesty.
Last year, AntiMullah suggested to abused wives add saltpeter to the food of husbands who go gadding arond with other women or remarry younger wives.
Within two weeks you could not buy saltpeter in Tehran stores! The shelves had been cleared by women but mostly by the male dominatged government trying to prevent this mode of retaliation being available to women.
Divorce in the Mullah regime is a matter of throwing the woman out of the house with a thrice stated "I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you" and her belongings thrown into the street behind her! NO! This is not an exaggeration.
Meanwhile the husband dotes on his new young wife,who replaced her. Or on his third or fourth wife he has introduced into his home to pleasure and serve him.
Just the capital city of Tehran has over 300,000 homeless street women who have nowhere to go, no jobs and join some 700,000 homeless children who also live on the streets.
Orphanages that existed under the late Shah were all closed down decades ago as a useless expense.
The Lionesses are an activist/feminist group which wants to return some power to Irfan's women, who traditionally have been the "power behind the throne" but are now abused sex objects/property of the husband.
One directive the Lionesses are suggesting to frighten Iranian men into behaving in a more "civilized" fashion is to suggest that if the husband decides to take a second or third or fourth wife or abuses his first wife, for her/them to boil a large pan of water and pour it on his genitals when he is asleep.
They propose that this only be done if the pouring person/team has somewhere to which to flee as retribution, including a severe beating or even being killed could follow this act.
However, the uncivilized husband will either remember the lesson for life or even bephysically "emasculated" forever.
The Lionesses are gathering funds/donstions and offering shelter and living costs inside Iran to women who fight back in this way and are structuring helping them out of Iran and into host countries, which will give them amnesty.
Last year, AntiMullah suggested to abused wives add saltpeter to the food of husbands who go gadding arond with other women or remarry younger wives.
Within two weeks you could not buy saltpeter in Tehran stores! The shelves had been cleared by women but mostly by the male dominatged government trying to prevent this mode of retaliation being available to women.
Monday, April 12, 2010
WATCH THE VIDEO AND SEE WHY SO MANY PERSIST ON ELIGIBILITY
As it becomes more and more apparent that Oba-HUSSEIN espouses and protects Islamist and Socialist-Marxist principles, mindsets and causes, his ineligibility may be the fastest way to take corrective action and while acknowledging that people voted for him and their vote should be respected, even if their stupidity should be bewailed, the statistics have changed to where charts show he no longer holds that kind of popularity.
Less than half the voters still favor him and his drop from some 70% approval to less than 46% yesterday, shows how much "buyers regret" has set in with regard to his thuggish policy and methods of getting things passed AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. (He works for "we the people" and is not our dictator).
Bumper stickers coming out now are much angrier than they were.
Here are some of them:

Less than half the voters still favor him and his drop from some 70% approval to less than 46% yesterday, shows how much "buyers regret" has set in with regard to his thuggish policy and methods of getting things passed AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. (He works for "we the people" and is not our dictator).
Bumper stickers coming out now are much angrier than they were.
Here are some of them:
AND MANY MORE WILL BE POSTED LATER

Sunday, April 11, 2010
SARKOZY (AND MANY OTHERS) APPALLED BY INSANE OBAMA
It's not just AntiMullah, which wonders about Oba-Hussein being an America destroying MORON!! See the catastrophies he has created with the list of countries below!

Sarkozy "Appalled" by "Insane" Obama
I've been wondering how the rest of the world, sans our constitutional viewpoint, views Obama. Now at least we know how French President Sarkozy sees him.
While our media still touts him as brilliant, articulate, and persuasive, the EU Times is reporting adjectives like "dangerous" and "insane," along with concerns that he is unwilling to listen to reason or logic. Sounds to me like Sarkozy is getting to know Barry pretty well.
French Leader Sarkozy Slams Obama, Warns He Might Be Insane
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today authored by France’s Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE) and recently“obtained” by the FSB shockingly quotes French President Nicolas Sarkozy [photo top right with Obama] as stating that President Barack Obama is “a dangerous[ly] aliéné”, which translates into his, Obama, being a“mad lunatic”, or in the American vernacular,“insane”.
According to this report, Sarkozy was“appalled” at Obama’s “vision” of what the World should be under his “guidance” and“amazed” at the American Presidents unwillingness to listen to either “reason” or “logic”.
Sarkozy’s meeting where these impressions of Obama were formed took place nearly a fortnight ago at the White House in Washington D.C., and upon his leaving he“scolded” Obama and the US for not listening closely enough to what the rest of the World has to say.
NOTE: OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION REFUSES TO LISTEN EVEN TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND RAMS HIS AMBITIONS DOWN OUR THROATS AGAINST OUR WILLS. AND HURRIES TO COMPLETE HIS MOVES BEFORE HIS DEMOCRATS ARE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE IN NOVEMBER.
Apparently, as this report details, the animosity between Sarkozy and (Moslem/Islamist) Obama arose out of how best the West can deal with the growing threat posed by rising Islamic fundamentalism. Both Sarkozy and his European neighbors had previously been supported in their efforts by the United States in forming an alliance to strengthen the integration of Muslim peoples into their societies, and has including France and Belgium moving to ban the wearing of burqa’s.
European fears over their growing Muslim populations appear to be valid as the growing immigration and birth rates of these Islamic peoples are warned is causing the “Eurabiazation” of the Continent and within a few generations will see them become the majority of nearly all of the EU Nations.
The greatest threat to these Western Nations posed by the Muslim peoples becoming the majority of their populations lies in their likelihood of destroying the Global Banking System which according to their faith is firmly rooted in “satanic” evil and “must” be replaced by an Islamic one.
[Note: Islamic banking refers to a system of banking or banking activity that is consistent with the principles of Islamic law (Sharia) and its practical application through the development of Islamic economics. Sharia prohibits the payment or acceptance of interest fees for the lending and accepting of money respectively, (Riba, usury) for specific terms, as well as investing in businesses that provide goods or services considered contrary to its principles (Haraam, forbidden).
Obama, on the other hand, doesn’t share the views of his European allies and has, instead, embarked upon a course of embracing the Muslim peoples of the World and to the shock of all has overturned the Bush era ban on the radical Swiss born Muslim Cleric Tariq Ramadan from entering the United States, and last year ordered the US government bailed out General Electric Capital Corporation to become the first Western multinational to issue an Islamic bond, and this past week commanded that all of his governments security documents eliminate the words “Islamic extremism” and “jihad”.
Sarkozy in these reports further warns that by Obama’s “unrestrained” and “destabilizing” actions an already tense Global situation is growing ever more catastrophic as America’s once stalwart allies are being cast aside in favor of a New World Order where instead of the United States securing its vital energy future through conquest and war it will now do so by appeasement to some of the most violent and radical regimes on Earth, and as we can see exampled:
In Egypt…where the 30-year reign of the stalwart US ally President Hosni Mubarak is being allowed by Obama to fall so that this most vital of Middle Eastern countries can be ruled by the former head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, who allowed through his appeasement the Persian Nation of Iran to gain the knowledge, equipment and expertise needed to build an atomic bomb.
In Turkey…where Obama in failing to stop, like all American Presidents before him, his Congress from passing a law blaming that critical Eurasian Nation for the 1915 Armenian genocide left Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan no choice but to recall his ambassador to the US.
In Kyrgyzstan…where Obama failed to stop a revolution against the American installed President thus allowing Russian Prime Minister Putin to achieve his goal of revolutionary change for that critical Central Asian Nation and putting in jeopardy the United States war in Afghanistan as the new Kyrgyz government prepares to throw the Americans out of their country thus depriving them of their main air supply route to their already undersupplied troops battling the Afghan Taliban.
In India…where by Obama’s failing to support the Indians fight against Pakistani backed Muslim terrorists has caused the second most powerful Asian Nation to turn towards Iran rebuffing all Western attempts to isolate them and instead of their participating in Obama’s Global Nuclear Summit have, instead, agreed to attend the Iranians.
In Pakistan…where just this week Obama gave this vital American ally a “public slap on the wrist” by denying to them the same nuclear deal he had previously given to India thus insuring the Pakistani military will cease their support for American troops in Afghanistan battling the Taliban.
In Afghanistan…where Obama has engaged in a public war with his ally President Karzai who because so enraged he threatened this past week to change his allegiance from the Americans to the Taliban.
In Israel…where Obama has so demoralized and demonized their once most reliable ally that Prime Minister Netanyahu has just announced he will not attend Obama’s Global Nuclear Summit because of his fears that the American President will not keep Egypt and Turkey under control thus threatening the Israelis nuclear supremacy over their Middle Eastern enemies who have sworn to destroy them.
In Brazil…where Obama has ordered his Defense Secretary Robert Gates to sign an historic defense agreement with this South American nuclear power whose President, Lula da Silva, has praised Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, slammed Israel, and has announced his intentions to visit Iran next month.
To all of these actions (and too many more to mention in this short report) Russian Military Analysts warn that Obama has pushed our world towards total global war more than any single leader since Nazi Germany’s Adolph Hitler, to which Russia and China are, likewise, preparing to confront to stop the Americans.
Most unfortunately for those Americans living under the Obama regime is that their attempts to stop the radical socialism he has pushed upon them from destroying their once great Nation has failed as new reports from the United States are showing that in under two years Obama and his cohorts have succeeded in making nearly 50% of these people support the other 50% who aren’t working.
(And which really should surprise none of them as during his campaign for the Presidency he openly vowed to “redistribute the wealth”, but which history has always shown makes everyone a pauper, except for the elites that is.)
For any of the few Americans left daring to oppose Obama we had previously warned about the massive death camps he is preparing for them, but which these most strange of peoples continue to deny the existence of in their naïve belief that if they choose not to believe a thing it makes it not true. (If this behavior sounds familiar it is only because Obama and his cohorts have, literally, used the same playbook used by the Nazis against the once free German people.)
And for those even daring to expose the truth of what is being done to the American people Obama took the unprecedented step this week of authorizing for the first time in American history his secret government intelligence services to assassinate one of their own citizens without benefit of trial leaving every human rights organization in the World in shock, including Tina Foster of the US-based International Justice Network who said, “I am in shock that they would do this. It is shocking that our Government would go to these extremes, even depriving someone of their life without a legal process.”
Now, if Sarkozy’s grim and dire assessment of Obama is true or not, it is not in our knowing, nor do these reports say. But, it is important to note that nearly all of the longstanding allies of the United States Obama has turned his back on are, admittedly, some really bad (to say the least) leaders who no one in their right mind would want to live under.
And too Obama’s apparent appeasement of Islamic terrorists there is growing evidence of his maybe throwing all his marbles (so to speak) in “one fell swoop”, and as evidenced by the 195 smart, guided, Blu-110 bombs and 192 massive 2000lb Blu-117 bombs he last month authorized Florida based Superior Maritime Services Concord to “immediately” ship from California to the massive US Air Force base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, which is in striking distance of Iran and if all of them were dropped on the Iranians would, literally, destroy them.
In finding the deliberately hidden clues as to what will happen as The Great Game nears its inevitable climax all caution must be taken, including to whom you might tell your most secret of thoughts, and as evidenced in the United States this past week should NEVER be voiced to your children, and as we can read as reported by the Info Wars News Service:
“A family in Williamson County, Austin have lost custody of their 7-year-old son as part of a Child Protective Services investigation because the parents taught their children to mistrust the government, an action that deemed them to be “unsuitable parents,” according to charges leveled by police officers in CPS documents.”
And to those still mocking the truths of these times, who continually fail to see what lies before them, we can only say you’re being the good and obedient lemmings you were brought up to be. So go back to sleep and dream the sweetest dreams you can, because before you know it you’ll be awakening in a living nightmare as those as ignorant as you, throughout all of history, have learned to their peril and loss.
To everyone else in America we can only advise you to begin stocking up for the End of the World….you won’t be alone.

Sarkozy "Appalled" by "Insane" Obama
I've been wondering how the rest of the world, sans our constitutional viewpoint, views Obama. Now at least we know how French President Sarkozy sees him.
While our media still touts him as brilliant, articulate, and persuasive, the EU Times is reporting adjectives like "dangerous" and "insane," along with concerns that he is unwilling to listen to reason or logic. Sounds to me like Sarkozy is getting to know Barry pretty well.
French Leader Sarkozy Slams Obama, Warns He Might Be Insane
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today authored by France’s Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE) and recently“obtained” by the FSB shockingly quotes French President Nicolas Sarkozy [photo top right with Obama] as stating that President Barack Obama is “a dangerous[ly] aliéné”, which translates into his, Obama, being a“mad lunatic”, or in the American vernacular,“insane”.
According to this report, Sarkozy was“appalled” at Obama’s “vision” of what the World should be under his “guidance” and“amazed” at the American Presidents unwillingness to listen to either “reason” or “logic”.
Sarkozy’s meeting where these impressions of Obama were formed took place nearly a fortnight ago at the White House in Washington D.C., and upon his leaving he“scolded” Obama and the US for not listening closely enough to what the rest of the World has to say.
NOTE: OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION REFUSES TO LISTEN EVEN TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND RAMS HIS AMBITIONS DOWN OUR THROATS AGAINST OUR WILLS. AND HURRIES TO COMPLETE HIS MOVES BEFORE HIS DEMOCRATS ARE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE IN NOVEMBER.
Apparently, as this report details, the animosity between Sarkozy and (Moslem/Islamist) Obama arose out of how best the West can deal with the growing threat posed by rising Islamic fundamentalism. Both Sarkozy and his European neighbors had previously been supported in their efforts by the United States in forming an alliance to strengthen the integration of Muslim peoples into their societies, and has including France and Belgium moving to ban the wearing of burqa’s.
European fears over their growing Muslim populations appear to be valid as the growing immigration and birth rates of these Islamic peoples are warned is causing the “Eurabiazation” of the Continent and within a few generations will see them become the majority of nearly all of the EU Nations.
The greatest threat to these Western Nations posed by the Muslim peoples becoming the majority of their populations lies in their likelihood of destroying the Global Banking System which according to their faith is firmly rooted in “satanic” evil and “must” be replaced by an Islamic one.
[Note: Islamic banking refers to a system of banking or banking activity that is consistent with the principles of Islamic law (Sharia) and its practical application through the development of Islamic economics. Sharia prohibits the payment or acceptance of interest fees for the lending and accepting of money respectively, (Riba, usury) for specific terms, as well as investing in businesses that provide goods or services considered contrary to its principles (Haraam, forbidden).
Obama, on the other hand, doesn’t share the views of his European allies and has, instead, embarked upon a course of embracing the Muslim peoples of the World and to the shock of all has overturned the Bush era ban on the radical Swiss born Muslim Cleric Tariq Ramadan from entering the United States, and last year ordered the US government bailed out General Electric Capital Corporation to become the first Western multinational to issue an Islamic bond, and this past week commanded that all of his governments security documents eliminate the words “Islamic extremism” and “jihad”.
Sarkozy in these reports further warns that by Obama’s “unrestrained” and “destabilizing” actions an already tense Global situation is growing ever more catastrophic as America’s once stalwart allies are being cast aside in favor of a New World Order where instead of the United States securing its vital energy future through conquest and war it will now do so by appeasement to some of the most violent and radical regimes on Earth, and as we can see exampled:
In Egypt…where the 30-year reign of the stalwart US ally President Hosni Mubarak is being allowed by Obama to fall so that this most vital of Middle Eastern countries can be ruled by the former head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, who allowed through his appeasement the Persian Nation of Iran to gain the knowledge, equipment and expertise needed to build an atomic bomb.
In Turkey…where Obama in failing to stop, like all American Presidents before him, his Congress from passing a law blaming that critical Eurasian Nation for the 1915 Armenian genocide left Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan no choice but to recall his ambassador to the US.
In Kyrgyzstan…where Obama failed to stop a revolution against the American installed President thus allowing Russian Prime Minister Putin to achieve his goal of revolutionary change for that critical Central Asian Nation and putting in jeopardy the United States war in Afghanistan as the new Kyrgyz government prepares to throw the Americans out of their country thus depriving them of their main air supply route to their already undersupplied troops battling the Afghan Taliban.
In India…where by Obama’s failing to support the Indians fight against Pakistani backed Muslim terrorists has caused the second most powerful Asian Nation to turn towards Iran rebuffing all Western attempts to isolate them and instead of their participating in Obama’s Global Nuclear Summit have, instead, agreed to attend the Iranians.
In Pakistan…where just this week Obama gave this vital American ally a “public slap on the wrist” by denying to them the same nuclear deal he had previously given to India thus insuring the Pakistani military will cease their support for American troops in Afghanistan battling the Taliban.
In Afghanistan…where Obama has engaged in a public war with his ally President Karzai who because so enraged he threatened this past week to change his allegiance from the Americans to the Taliban.
In Israel…where Obama has so demoralized and demonized their once most reliable ally that Prime Minister Netanyahu has just announced he will not attend Obama’s Global Nuclear Summit because of his fears that the American President will not keep Egypt and Turkey under control thus threatening the Israelis nuclear supremacy over their Middle Eastern enemies who have sworn to destroy them.
In Brazil…where Obama has ordered his Defense Secretary Robert Gates to sign an historic defense agreement with this South American nuclear power whose President, Lula da Silva, has praised Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, slammed Israel, and has announced his intentions to visit Iran next month.
To all of these actions (and too many more to mention in this short report) Russian Military Analysts warn that Obama has pushed our world towards total global war more than any single leader since Nazi Germany’s Adolph Hitler, to which Russia and China are, likewise, preparing to confront to stop the Americans.
Most unfortunately for those Americans living under the Obama regime is that their attempts to stop the radical socialism he has pushed upon them from destroying their once great Nation has failed as new reports from the United States are showing that in under two years Obama and his cohorts have succeeded in making nearly 50% of these people support the other 50% who aren’t working.
(And which really should surprise none of them as during his campaign for the Presidency he openly vowed to “redistribute the wealth”, but which history has always shown makes everyone a pauper, except for the elites that is.)
For any of the few Americans left daring to oppose Obama we had previously warned about the massive death camps he is preparing for them, but which these most strange of peoples continue to deny the existence of in their naïve belief that if they choose not to believe a thing it makes it not true. (If this behavior sounds familiar it is only because Obama and his cohorts have, literally, used the same playbook used by the Nazis against the once free German people.)
And for those even daring to expose the truth of what is being done to the American people Obama took the unprecedented step this week of authorizing for the first time in American history his secret government intelligence services to assassinate one of their own citizens without benefit of trial leaving every human rights organization in the World in shock, including Tina Foster of the US-based International Justice Network who said, “I am in shock that they would do this. It is shocking that our Government would go to these extremes, even depriving someone of their life without a legal process.”
Now, if Sarkozy’s grim and dire assessment of Obama is true or not, it is not in our knowing, nor do these reports say. But, it is important to note that nearly all of the longstanding allies of the United States Obama has turned his back on are, admittedly, some really bad (to say the least) leaders who no one in their right mind would want to live under.
And too Obama’s apparent appeasement of Islamic terrorists there is growing evidence of his maybe throwing all his marbles (so to speak) in “one fell swoop”, and as evidenced by the 195 smart, guided, Blu-110 bombs and 192 massive 2000lb Blu-117 bombs he last month authorized Florida based Superior Maritime Services Concord to “immediately” ship from California to the massive US Air Force base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, which is in striking distance of Iran and if all of them were dropped on the Iranians would, literally, destroy them.
In finding the deliberately hidden clues as to what will happen as The Great Game nears its inevitable climax all caution must be taken, including to whom you might tell your most secret of thoughts, and as evidenced in the United States this past week should NEVER be voiced to your children, and as we can read as reported by the Info Wars News Service:
“A family in Williamson County, Austin have lost custody of their 7-year-old son as part of a Child Protective Services investigation because the parents taught their children to mistrust the government, an action that deemed them to be “unsuitable parents,” according to charges leveled by police officers in CPS documents.”
And to those still mocking the truths of these times, who continually fail to see what lies before them, we can only say you’re being the good and obedient lemmings you were brought up to be. So go back to sleep and dream the sweetest dreams you can, because before you know it you’ll be awakening in a living nightmare as those as ignorant as you, throughout all of history, have learned to their peril and loss.
To everyone else in America we can only advise you to begin stocking up for the End of the World….you won’t be alone.
SOME SUNDAY COMMENTS
While Moslem groups like CAIR or NIAC insist that any activity that contravenes their cultural desires couched in the name of Islam is against-Islam, they feel free to trample rough shod over the cultures and logical customs and decisions of their host countries. And whine when they are not immediately accomodatged. Or try to sue to IMPOSE their Moslem ideas on a Christian country and population, in which they are a NEW FOUND miniority and not a long standing presence.
This pressure on indigenous cultures to change their ways to meet Islamic mores becomes an invasion as the new sector of generally immigrant additions grows and bullies freedom loving nations into rejecting their own customs and bowing to the new bullies, who insist on their own minority ones becoming dominant.
In the name of freedom (as we know it), the New Moslems curtail and destroy those very freedoms under which they operate - for everyone else but themselves. They demand freedoms for themselves that neither their customs (they barely qualify, if at all, as a "religion" in the face of their all inclusive socio-political structure) will allow for anyone else, except themselves.
As an example, imagine what if, in a similar fashion, Hispanic, Russian or other ethnic gangs in the USA insisted they were to be treated differently because of their ehtinic origins and customs.
Muslim doctors and nurses are to be allowed to opt out of strict hygiene rules introduced by the NHS to restrict the spread of hospital superbugs. Female staff who follow the Islamic faith will be allowed to cover their arms to preserve their modesty despite earlier guidance that all staff should be "bare below the elbow". The Department of Health has also relaxed rules prohibiting jewellery ... The rules were drawn up to reduce the number of patients who were falling ill, and even dying, from superbugs such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile.
Islam appears to be putting the mental comfort of their adherents over that of their patients! So they fall ill and die - so what ? They are for the most part unbelievers and should not even be allowed to exists let alone receive "hygienic" healthcare.
Obeying Allah supercedes any of that and as has been stated by senior clerics, if any scientific discovery is not in the Koran (written 1,400 years ago) then it is a lie since Allah has mentioned everything that exists inside the Koran.
The riposte that not ALL clerics or proponents of Islam think or speak in this manner in no way reduces the weight of this as those that do, the most fanatical and recently called jihadis promote this attitude and are the most strident and VIOLENT. Those that do not preach that way are the tiny MINORITY.
The "silent majority" of Moslems in Western countries, who in truth do not act, nor generally think in this way are of little import since they can neither influence their religious leaders nor dare to stand in opppsition as this immediately brands them as apostates and worthy of death!
Inside Moslem countries death or decades of prison quickly follow - read the Moslem news media - but we are still able to avoid most of this savagery in the West - though "honor killings" are on the rise.
Quite recently in Pakistan, a Chrisitian Pakistani was sentenced to 30-years in prison on a trumped up charge of insulting the Koran. The point is not it was trumped up within Pakistani jurisprudence but that you COULD be sent to prison almost for life for insulting the book.
Imagine being condemned to ANY prison time for insulting the BIBLE! Yet this is a common enough charge in Moslem countries, with a potential DEATH sentence in some circumstances and coming to your neighborhood if you allow Sharia law to permeate your system of jurisprudence. Not for insulting YOUR own bible but someone else's Koran. (Note Gitmo accusations).
Perhaps believably denied to a naive populace within the broadly Christian minded societies of the USA and the West, but for those who have travelled inside or lived in Moslem countries or follow jihadi influence in their own or other nations, Islam being a "religion of peace" rather than "body pieces" is a joke.
There is more blood being shed around the world in the name of Islam, or for Islamic tenets than for other reasons. Anti-Russian Chechnya, Chinese Moslem regions, Taleban, Indian and Pakistani massacres, Iraqi Sunni and Shia clashes as well as Somalian or other North African Islamic movements like the Salafis all have underpinnings of Moslem efforts to impose their Islamic views (often conradictory among themselves) on local peoples and regions.
If they were not militant and attacking those around them, how many of these would be under direct attack themselves and - as often claimed "defending themselves"? Rarely does any Western group prevent a Moslem from practising Islam in private as other religions tend to do - except when the "practise" involves IMPOSING their views, sometimes violently, on others who neither grew up with Islamic agendas nor beliefs.
A Moslem in New York is suing a hotel chain for saying it will only hire "clean shaven" employees for a public view position. Would a lazy, unshaven Christian be hired? No. So where is there any discrimination? Yet the Moslem insists HE should be hired - against any other policy considerations - though nobody else would be.
That is typical Islamic discrimination against all but themselves. All stays peaceful as long as you concede to their demands. By "their" read the fanatical, jihad leaders, who have found they can bully host governments into ceding to them. As the Moslem second-generation minorities acquire host country nationality and voting rights, as increasingly the case in England and some other European countries, this bullying approach has entered the political arena with a vengeance.
Regular mass car burnings in Paris or concentrated Moslem enclaves in Sweden, where schools with hundreds of students do not have a SINGLE original ethnic Swede in them.
Without the "cover" of "religion" the thuggish activities would be subject to legal penalties in most countries.
For example a Moslem throwing a shoe as an intended insult is now ALLOWED in England as a sign of Moslem protest and will not be a crime. Not as part of an Islamic or Koranic law but an Islamic "custom". Even if the "shoe" is a ski-boot and sends a politician or policeman at whom it is aimed to hospital? Recently a thrown stick came under this Islamic "protection" guideline.
This pressure on indigenous cultures to change their ways to meet Islamic mores becomes an invasion as the new sector of generally immigrant additions grows and bullies freedom loving nations into rejecting their own customs and bowing to the new bullies, who insist on their own minority ones becoming dominant.
In the name of freedom (as we know it), the New Moslems curtail and destroy those very freedoms under which they operate - for everyone else but themselves. They demand freedoms for themselves that neither their customs (they barely qualify, if at all, as a "religion" in the face of their all inclusive socio-political structure) will allow for anyone else, except themselves.
As an example, imagine what if, in a similar fashion, Hispanic, Russian or other ethnic gangs in the USA insisted they were to be treated differently because of their ehtinic origins and customs.
Muslim doctors and nurses are to be allowed to opt out of strict hygiene rules introduced by the NHS to restrict the spread of hospital superbugs. Female staff who follow the Islamic faith will be allowed to cover their arms to preserve their modesty despite earlier guidance that all staff should be "bare below the elbow". The Department of Health has also relaxed rules prohibiting jewellery ... The rules were drawn up to reduce the number of patients who were falling ill, and even dying, from superbugs such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile.
Islam appears to be putting the mental comfort of their adherents over that of their patients! So they fall ill and die - so what ? They are for the most part unbelievers and should not even be allowed to exists let alone receive "hygienic" healthcare.
Obeying Allah supercedes any of that and as has been stated by senior clerics, if any scientific discovery is not in the Koran (written 1,400 years ago) then it is a lie since Allah has mentioned everything that exists inside the Koran.
The riposte that not ALL clerics or proponents of Islam think or speak in this manner in no way reduces the weight of this as those that do, the most fanatical and recently called jihadis promote this attitude and are the most strident and VIOLENT. Those that do not preach that way are the tiny MINORITY.
The "silent majority" of Moslems in Western countries, who in truth do not act, nor generally think in this way are of little import since they can neither influence their religious leaders nor dare to stand in opppsition as this immediately brands them as apostates and worthy of death!
Inside Moslem countries death or decades of prison quickly follow - read the Moslem news media - but we are still able to avoid most of this savagery in the West - though "honor killings" are on the rise.
Quite recently in Pakistan, a Chrisitian Pakistani was sentenced to 30-years in prison on a trumped up charge of insulting the Koran. The point is not it was trumped up within Pakistani jurisprudence but that you COULD be sent to prison almost for life for insulting the book.
Imagine being condemned to ANY prison time for insulting the BIBLE! Yet this is a common enough charge in Moslem countries, with a potential DEATH sentence in some circumstances and coming to your neighborhood if you allow Sharia law to permeate your system of jurisprudence. Not for insulting YOUR own bible but someone else's Koran. (Note Gitmo accusations).
Perhaps believably denied to a naive populace within the broadly Christian minded societies of the USA and the West, but for those who have travelled inside or lived in Moslem countries or follow jihadi influence in their own or other nations, Islam being a "religion of peace" rather than "body pieces" is a joke.
There is more blood being shed around the world in the name of Islam, or for Islamic tenets than for other reasons. Anti-Russian Chechnya, Chinese Moslem regions, Taleban, Indian and Pakistani massacres, Iraqi Sunni and Shia clashes as well as Somalian or other North African Islamic movements like the Salafis all have underpinnings of Moslem efforts to impose their Islamic views (often conradictory among themselves) on local peoples and regions.
If they were not militant and attacking those around them, how many of these would be under direct attack themselves and - as often claimed "defending themselves"? Rarely does any Western group prevent a Moslem from practising Islam in private as other religions tend to do - except when the "practise" involves IMPOSING their views, sometimes violently, on others who neither grew up with Islamic agendas nor beliefs.
A Moslem in New York is suing a hotel chain for saying it will only hire "clean shaven" employees for a public view position. Would a lazy, unshaven Christian be hired? No. So where is there any discrimination? Yet the Moslem insists HE should be hired - against any other policy considerations - though nobody else would be.
That is typical Islamic discrimination against all but themselves. All stays peaceful as long as you concede to their demands. By "their" read the fanatical, jihad leaders, who have found they can bully host governments into ceding to them. As the Moslem second-generation minorities acquire host country nationality and voting rights, as increasingly the case in England and some other European countries, this bullying approach has entered the political arena with a vengeance.
Regular mass car burnings in Paris or concentrated Moslem enclaves in Sweden, where schools with hundreds of students do not have a SINGLE original ethnic Swede in them.
Without the "cover" of "religion" the thuggish activities would be subject to legal penalties in most countries.
For example a Moslem throwing a shoe as an intended insult is now ALLOWED in England as a sign of Moslem protest and will not be a crime. Not as part of an Islamic or Koranic law but an Islamic "custom". Even if the "shoe" is a ski-boot and sends a politician or policeman at whom it is aimed to hospital? Recently a thrown stick came under this Islamic "protection" guideline.
Friday, April 09, 2010
CHANGE! AND THE RESULT
OBA-HUSSEIN-KHOMEINI
NOT WHAT WE WANTED BUT SADLY WHAT WE GOT!
SO GOODBYE TO THE AMERICA WE ALL KNEW
UNLESS GOD GRANTS US A MIRACLE.
WE MAY WELL BE ALREADY PAST THE POINT OF RESCUE

WE HAVE BEEN SUCKED INTO HIS carefully PLANNED FINANCIAL IMPLOSION
Thursday, April 08, 2010
INSIDER IRAN LEAKS AND COMMENTS
With information from and about Islamic Iran often coming fast and furious, through a variety of channels, the results sometimes end up like the children's game we used to call "telephone". Several children would line up and someone would whisper a sentence in the first one's ear. That child would urgently pass on what they heard to the next and so on down the line. No repetitions allowed!
What was originally said and what the end result became was usually unrecognizable and hillarious.
And then there was the kid who would purposely mishear - repeating "disinformation".
With all the blocks and filters the Islamic regime puts up to prevent electronic sharing of information and the risk of a death sentence for doing anything which disspleases the Mullahs, including speaking out or passing something to the West, what reaches most of us is often distorted.
But as the saying goes "if there's smoke there is fire" so we often share what we hear with a clear caveat.
Here is what we have been getting this week.
1. The White House apparently hired an Iranian as a senior advisor on dealing with the Islamic Iran problem - purposely overlooking or simply ignorant of their being a paid Mullah Regime OPERATIVE.
Looking at the radicals and anti-American mindsets Oba-Hussein-Khomeini has brought into his White House and his pro-Islamic Iran regime stance against the people of Iran, I would submit the hire was with full knowledge of the advisor's allegiance.
With the same arrogance that trained infiltrator Akbar Ganji was embraced by the CIA with Communist Noam Chomsky's full assistance and had our secrets shared with him, Oba-Hussein probably thought that with his messianic influence he could turn the Mullah agent and get good information from him.
Luckily, after it was discovered the new advisor was sharing everything he saw and heard with the Mullah regime and was advising them on how to handle Oba-Hussein rather than the other way round, ALLEGEDLY a moment of sanity sparked and he REPORTEDLY was fired.
For those who observe, there is an almost daily new action to protect Moslem interests and increase their influence in America and for anyone who still says OBA-HUSSEIN is not behaving like a good Moslem, you live in La-La Land or in outer space.
Of course, since so much of his funding comes from Arab Moslem countries, including Islamic Iran, he could well be encouraged to be their paid puppet Dhimmi rather than deep Islamic beliefs since those can conflict with his Marxist tendencies.
Note, however, "Marxist-Islamist" has become a real political category since Ayatollah Khomeini did to Iran what Oba-Hussein-Khomeini is doing to the USA - both using the same Soviet playbook. Ayatollah Khomeini with directives and guidance from the Soviet Embassy in Tehran 1978/79 and Oba-Husssein from a collective of Communist and Socialist groups and organizations in the USA or soon to be USSA (United Socialist States of America).
Islamic Jihad groups and Islam itself - which in so many ways resemble dictatorial Communism, other than their "man in charge" is called Allah and not a Kommisar also push for power and influence, which Oba-Hussein gladly gives them in his mission to CHANGE the USA into the USSA even if he destroys us in the process.
2. In an effort to protect their Kharg Island oi/lshipping facilities and tanker loading terminal,s and jetties, which provides export access to open water even if or when the Persian Gulf is blocked, the Mullahs have sold the island! Not the land but everything on it for a reported $12.5 Billion, to an as yet undeclared FOREIGN country. Russia and China come to mind.
They hope in this way to discourage or prevent any attack on their oil lifeline, since this would involve the BEST "interests" of that nation and bring pressure on Israel or the West.
3. After waiting in vain, for Prince Reza Pahlavi, heir to the Persian throne to do something to get the country back into sane hands and remove it from oppressive and murderous Islamic regime control, a former member of the late-Shah's twin sister, Princess Ashraf's Secretariat (Jahanshahi or Javanshiri ??) is setting up a government in exile. Finallly!!!!
Apparently with an operating budget of $100 million with which to achieve this.
Two things come to mind here:
a) Mullah Rafsanjani, the world's 14th richest man and provider of funding for the Green revolution which overstepped original intentions and went against Islamic jurisprudence (the Mullah regime set up by Iran's Khomeini, of which Rafsanjani is and always was, a key player) has recently come under vicious attack from the ruling Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the former Revolutionary Guard commander, President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad.
Below the surface, the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard has taken over Islamic Iran, though in the process a new recent directive will PRIVATIZE many business corporations and take it out of the Ivisible RGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps).
Here again the action is a defensive one as the West is moving to sanction the IRGC, which currrently owns and runs almost every major industrial project in Iran and has already blocked much of the IRGC available banking channels. If disperesed to private "ownership", which will be selected IRGC approved persons, disqualifying their transactiopnhs could become too hard to handle.
Rafsanjani children including his fiery daughter, have been arrested and the regime has announced they will soon be putting Rafsanjani himself on trial for his support and part he played in the anti-Mahmoud Ahmnadi-Nejad election protest by the Green movement.
I would posit the funds for a government in exile may originate with Rafsanjani, who now has his life at risk. An almost certain death sentence since the regime stripped him of his 'ayatollah" title which would have prevented him bein hanged. As was the case with Khomenei.
For background read the articles beneath the blinking eye graphic in the left hand columnn of our Main Page. More specifically "The Mullah threat not Sinking In" and "can the USA avoid attacking Iran".
Back in 2006 AntiMullah proposed a governmenbt in exile and a "Sandblasting Operation" as pasted below:
For some time now, nobody in power in the USA, nor in Europe seems to be able to think outside the box or even to set in motion anything to remove the clerics, who now threaten civilization, not just the USA and Western culture.
But I'm not here to criticize, only to propose a viable solution with a still familiar yet creative box.
Specially in the light of a battered, no longer effective student or any other anti-Mullah movement in or out of the country nor any charismatic figure behind which those inside Iran can rally.
Proponents of using the Ukraine "Orange" revolution methodology have gone on record to suggest using "green" - THE COLOR OF ISLAM - as the Iranian Orange, so even ideas with some potential merit, though only if tailored down to minutia to fit the country and culture instead of a general concept that worked in a totally different environment and level or repression, appear to be "mis-thought" out in advance.
The recent "selection" of Ahmadi-Nejad as President of Iran has opened a door that wasn't there before - for removing the Mullah regime in several steps - (brevity for this posting prevents expanding much on headings but others can sit and expand on the concept portrayed here. I'd be glad to participate with any serious authorities who can get something done):
1. Get Rafsanjani out of there before they kill or arrest him for corruption, then isolate or kill him.
Canada where he has large development interests offers other advantages, too, to center his forthcoming activities. (Tactical rather than strategic). (Ignore Rafsanjani's call for unity inside Iran, he has no choice but to say this to stay in one piece).
2. Offer him support to contest the "election" result he recently lost and for him to form a "government in exile" to oppose the current regime (from his base in Canada). he is enough of a pragmatist to become a player with a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow offered him.
3. Link him up with the Mojaheddin Khalgh - MEK (currently designated a terrorist organization based on Clinton trying to appease the clerics) and thus provide Rafsanjani with a double approach and a motivated strike force for later entry back into Iran. A less than happy but still a practical "coalition" for both parties that can be expected to be conditionally accepted on a pragmatic basis. Neither of these two can expect Western support otherwise. (Again details, advantages and drawbacks of the coalition require more space than can reasonably be used in this posting).
4. In return, promise USA (and to the extent possible Western) support if they quickly identify and REVEAL and once in power, drop all plans for nuclear sites and ambitions. (MEK will happily continue to do so). Russia will be miffed financially. But the nuclear advancement will stop, specially with MEK to ensure Rafsanjani plays it straight. And the consequent in-fighting that will scuttle covert plans.
5. After they do get into power, they will soon try to destroy each other as a matter of course - (or can be easily incited/encouraged to do so). Rafsanjani mullahs, even with the Reformists, cannot be the future of Iran, Neither can the MEK, which can muster an estimated 100,000 followers - boots on the ground inside Iran. Individually neither group has enough strength, together they can rapidly sandblast the country clean for future generations and democracy. Neither truly supports the other to establish a durable co-operation.
6. In about two, maybe three years, vacuum up the debris and have a clean slate for future democracy in Iran with neither weakened "coalition" partner able to stop it. Probably the least blood shedding of any scenario and done by supporters of Rafsanjani and the MEK, neither of which are needed for the future of the country and thus do not need to keep their hands free of blood as would a Monarchy, or any other democratic movement.
Please notice simplicity of language (no effort to be erudite or a guru) and intentional lack of detailed exposition. Including how best to persuade 70-year old Rafsanjani to come on board (I doubt he will put up much resistance other than demanding monetary returns on projects he presently has for his family and heirs) and the MEK has already asked for a chance to govern Iran for six months before holding elections as their pre-condition. I'm providing the strategy concept not the detailed tactics - though I could help furnish some of that, too. If nobody will think outside the box, here is a sufficiently "familiar" box within which to think and be successful.
Even with this premature heads up to the enemy. Want to bet they'll take the gamble to get into power despite knowing what the aftermath plan is? The only serious fly in the ointment at this point might be the risk of President Putin of Russia deciding to later provide full Russian support for the Marxist Mojaheddin (and Fedayeen or various similar Iranian groups) and impede Western efforts to pull them out by the roots.
The Soviets provided enormous support in 1979 to the MEK, which was the real instigator of the Khomeini revolution. (I was there at the time "before and after" till I was helped out). By contrast the Ayatollahs and the fervent military Ahmadi-Nejad secular colleagues won't be removable in a matter of two or three years and Iran will have nuclear weapon capability, which will make future chances of removing them even more remote. Not so with operation "sandblast" outlined above.
UPDATE: The above needs a tweak or two to bring it up to date BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT FIRST STEP is really to get an agreed CONSTITUTION FOR IRAN - without any religious ASPECTS in it. Remove religion and religious powers that have previously been incorporated even 100 years ago in a revision for a Constitutional Monarchy from any text for the New Iran.
But I digress.
Efforts to form an exile government , under way in France, may be analyzed as an indirect slap in the face to Reza Pahlavi though he is probably involved behind the scenes with his rather ill Aunt's efforts. He has been working hard in Paris to form coalitions and may need to stay out of any exile government to avoid tainting it with a purely "royalist" stamp thus to the possible exclusion of other political groups.
Or an obstacle could be Reza Pahlavi's father-in-law, who was a member of the National Front, student opposition to the Monarchy and currently works closely with the Mullah regime and has huge construction projects INSIDE IRAN with Mullah regime partners!
Thus everything that goes on around him reaches the Mullahs in Iran within MINUTES!!
Specially with Colonel Oveissi, brother of the late, very loyal Imperial Guard commander General Oveissi esconced there and recent new owner of a shopping mall. Neither he nor his family has nor had the money to make such an investment and the funds reportedly came from the Mullah regime which has apparently bought him.
Keeping RP's retinue of tainted people out of proximity of the new exile government may also make good intelligence and counter-inteligence sense.
RP's wife Yasaman (Jasmine) will accompany Empress Farah to a $300 a plate fund raiser for children, in Los Angeles on March 14th at the Beverly Hilton hotel, but warnings have reached us that the Mullah regime has hired and bribed regular press photographers to take a mutlitude of photos of the guests so that they can be identified as royalist supporters and new dossiers opened on any who have not previously been tagged.
Here again, this could be an effort to prevent the fund raiser being a success by scaring off potential guests, specially Persians who have family back home or may later wish to travel to Iran and then be arrested for anti-regime activity. The Mullahs could not care less that the funds would go to help children.
They are eerily afraid of the royalist movement and their ability to legitimately replace them.
What was originally said and what the end result became was usually unrecognizable and hillarious.
And then there was the kid who would purposely mishear - repeating "disinformation".
With all the blocks and filters the Islamic regime puts up to prevent electronic sharing of information and the risk of a death sentence for doing anything which disspleases the Mullahs, including speaking out or passing something to the West, what reaches most of us is often distorted.
But as the saying goes "if there's smoke there is fire" so we often share what we hear with a clear caveat.
Here is what we have been getting this week.
1. The White House apparently hired an Iranian as a senior advisor on dealing with the Islamic Iran problem - purposely overlooking or simply ignorant of their being a paid Mullah Regime OPERATIVE.
Looking at the radicals and anti-American mindsets Oba-Hussein-Khomeini has brought into his White House and his pro-Islamic Iran regime stance against the people of Iran, I would submit the hire was with full knowledge of the advisor's allegiance.
With the same arrogance that trained infiltrator Akbar Ganji was embraced by the CIA with Communist Noam Chomsky's full assistance and had our secrets shared with him, Oba-Hussein probably thought that with his messianic influence he could turn the Mullah agent and get good information from him.
Luckily, after it was discovered the new advisor was sharing everything he saw and heard with the Mullah regime and was advising them on how to handle Oba-Hussein rather than the other way round, ALLEGEDLY a moment of sanity sparked and he REPORTEDLY was fired.
For those who observe, there is an almost daily new action to protect Moslem interests and increase their influence in America and for anyone who still says OBA-HUSSEIN is not behaving like a good Moslem, you live in La-La Land or in outer space.
Of course, since so much of his funding comes from Arab Moslem countries, including Islamic Iran, he could well be encouraged to be their paid puppet Dhimmi rather than deep Islamic beliefs since those can conflict with his Marxist tendencies.
Note, however, "Marxist-Islamist" has become a real political category since Ayatollah Khomeini did to Iran what Oba-Hussein-Khomeini is doing to the USA - both using the same Soviet playbook. Ayatollah Khomeini with directives and guidance from the Soviet Embassy in Tehran 1978/79 and Oba-Husssein from a collective of Communist and Socialist groups and organizations in the USA or soon to be USSA (United Socialist States of America).
Islamic Jihad groups and Islam itself - which in so many ways resemble dictatorial Communism, other than their "man in charge" is called Allah and not a Kommisar also push for power and influence, which Oba-Hussein gladly gives them in his mission to CHANGE the USA into the USSA even if he destroys us in the process.
2. In an effort to protect their Kharg Island oi/lshipping facilities and tanker loading terminal,s and jetties, which provides export access to open water even if or when the Persian Gulf is blocked, the Mullahs have sold the island! Not the land but everything on it for a reported $12.5 Billion, to an as yet undeclared FOREIGN country. Russia and China come to mind.
They hope in this way to discourage or prevent any attack on their oil lifeline, since this would involve the BEST "interests" of that nation and bring pressure on Israel or the West.
3. After waiting in vain, for Prince Reza Pahlavi, heir to the Persian throne to do something to get the country back into sane hands and remove it from oppressive and murderous Islamic regime control, a former member of the late-Shah's twin sister, Princess Ashraf's Secretariat (Jahanshahi or Javanshiri ??) is setting up a government in exile. Finallly!!!!
Apparently with an operating budget of $100 million with which to achieve this.
Two things come to mind here:
a) Mullah Rafsanjani, the world's 14th richest man and provider of funding for the Green revolution which overstepped original intentions and went against Islamic jurisprudence (the Mullah regime set up by Iran's Khomeini, of which Rafsanjani is and always was, a key player) has recently come under vicious attack from the ruling Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the former Revolutionary Guard commander, President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad.
Below the surface, the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard has taken over Islamic Iran, though in the process a new recent directive will PRIVATIZE many business corporations and take it out of the Ivisible RGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps).
Here again the action is a defensive one as the West is moving to sanction the IRGC, which currrently owns and runs almost every major industrial project in Iran and has already blocked much of the IRGC available banking channels. If disperesed to private "ownership", which will be selected IRGC approved persons, disqualifying their transactiopnhs could become too hard to handle.
Rafsanjani children including his fiery daughter, have been arrested and the regime has announced they will soon be putting Rafsanjani himself on trial for his support and part he played in the anti-Mahmoud Ahmnadi-Nejad election protest by the Green movement.
I would posit the funds for a government in exile may originate with Rafsanjani, who now has his life at risk. An almost certain death sentence since the regime stripped him of his 'ayatollah" title which would have prevented him bein hanged. As was the case with Khomenei.
For background read the articles beneath the blinking eye graphic in the left hand columnn of our Main Page. More specifically "The Mullah threat not Sinking In" and "can the USA avoid attacking Iran".
Back in 2006 AntiMullah proposed a governmenbt in exile and a "Sandblasting Operation" as pasted below:
For some time now, nobody in power in the USA, nor in Europe seems to be able to think outside the box or even to set in motion anything to remove the clerics, who now threaten civilization, not just the USA and Western culture.
But I'm not here to criticize, only to propose a viable solution with a still familiar yet creative box.
Specially in the light of a battered, no longer effective student or any other anti-Mullah movement in or out of the country nor any charismatic figure behind which those inside Iran can rally.
Proponents of using the Ukraine "Orange" revolution methodology have gone on record to suggest using "green" - THE COLOR OF ISLAM - as the Iranian Orange, so even ideas with some potential merit, though only if tailored down to minutia to fit the country and culture instead of a general concept that worked in a totally different environment and level or repression, appear to be "mis-thought" out in advance.
The recent "selection" of Ahmadi-Nejad as President of Iran has opened a door that wasn't there before - for removing the Mullah regime in several steps - (brevity for this posting prevents expanding much on headings but others can sit and expand on the concept portrayed here. I'd be glad to participate with any serious authorities who can get something done):
1. Get Rafsanjani out of there before they kill or arrest him for corruption, then isolate or kill him.
Canada where he has large development interests offers other advantages, too, to center his forthcoming activities. (Tactical rather than strategic). (Ignore Rafsanjani's call for unity inside Iran, he has no choice but to say this to stay in one piece).
2. Offer him support to contest the "election" result he recently lost and for him to form a "government in exile" to oppose the current regime (from his base in Canada). he is enough of a pragmatist to become a player with a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow offered him.
3. Link him up with the Mojaheddin Khalgh - MEK (currently designated a terrorist organization based on Clinton trying to appease the clerics) and thus provide Rafsanjani with a double approach and a motivated strike force for later entry back into Iran. A less than happy but still a practical "coalition" for both parties that can be expected to be conditionally accepted on a pragmatic basis. Neither of these two can expect Western support otherwise. (Again details, advantages and drawbacks of the coalition require more space than can reasonably be used in this posting).
4. In return, promise USA (and to the extent possible Western) support if they quickly identify and REVEAL and once in power, drop all plans for nuclear sites and ambitions. (MEK will happily continue to do so). Russia will be miffed financially. But the nuclear advancement will stop, specially with MEK to ensure Rafsanjani plays it straight. And the consequent in-fighting that will scuttle covert plans.
5. After they do get into power, they will soon try to destroy each other as a matter of course - (or can be easily incited/encouraged to do so). Rafsanjani mullahs, even with the Reformists, cannot be the future of Iran, Neither can the MEK, which can muster an estimated 100,000 followers - boots on the ground inside Iran. Individually neither group has enough strength, together they can rapidly sandblast the country clean for future generations and democracy. Neither truly supports the other to establish a durable co-operation.
6. In about two, maybe three years, vacuum up the debris and have a clean slate for future democracy in Iran with neither weakened "coalition" partner able to stop it. Probably the least blood shedding of any scenario and done by supporters of Rafsanjani and the MEK, neither of which are needed for the future of the country and thus do not need to keep their hands free of blood as would a Monarchy, or any other democratic movement.
Please notice simplicity of language (no effort to be erudite or a guru) and intentional lack of detailed exposition. Including how best to persuade 70-year old Rafsanjani to come on board (I doubt he will put up much resistance other than demanding monetary returns on projects he presently has for his family and heirs) and the MEK has already asked for a chance to govern Iran for six months before holding elections as their pre-condition. I'm providing the strategy concept not the detailed tactics - though I could help furnish some of that, too. If nobody will think outside the box, here is a sufficiently "familiar" box within which to think and be successful.
Even with this premature heads up to the enemy. Want to bet they'll take the gamble to get into power despite knowing what the aftermath plan is? The only serious fly in the ointment at this point might be the risk of President Putin of Russia deciding to later provide full Russian support for the Marxist Mojaheddin (and Fedayeen or various similar Iranian groups) and impede Western efforts to pull them out by the roots.
The Soviets provided enormous support in 1979 to the MEK, which was the real instigator of the Khomeini revolution. (I was there at the time "before and after" till I was helped out). By contrast the Ayatollahs and the fervent military Ahmadi-Nejad secular colleagues won't be removable in a matter of two or three years and Iran will have nuclear weapon capability, which will make future chances of removing them even more remote. Not so with operation "sandblast" outlined above.
UPDATE: The above needs a tweak or two to bring it up to date BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT FIRST STEP is really to get an agreed CONSTITUTION FOR IRAN - without any religious ASPECTS in it. Remove religion and religious powers that have previously been incorporated even 100 years ago in a revision for a Constitutional Monarchy from any text for the New Iran.
But I digress.
Efforts to form an exile government , under way in France, may be analyzed as an indirect slap in the face to Reza Pahlavi though he is probably involved behind the scenes with his rather ill Aunt's efforts. He has been working hard in Paris to form coalitions and may need to stay out of any exile government to avoid tainting it with a purely "royalist" stamp thus to the possible exclusion of other political groups.
Or an obstacle could be Reza Pahlavi's father-in-law, who was a member of the National Front, student opposition to the Monarchy and currently works closely with the Mullah regime and has huge construction projects INSIDE IRAN with Mullah regime partners!
Thus everything that goes on around him reaches the Mullahs in Iran within MINUTES!!
Specially with Colonel Oveissi, brother of the late, very loyal Imperial Guard commander General Oveissi esconced there and recent new owner of a shopping mall. Neither he nor his family has nor had the money to make such an investment and the funds reportedly came from the Mullah regime which has apparently bought him.
Keeping RP's retinue of tainted people out of proximity of the new exile government may also make good intelligence and counter-inteligence sense.
RP's wife Yasaman (Jasmine) will accompany Empress Farah to a $300 a plate fund raiser for children, in Los Angeles on March 14th at the Beverly Hilton hotel, but warnings have reached us that the Mullah regime has hired and bribed regular press photographers to take a mutlitude of photos of the guests so that they can be identified as royalist supporters and new dossiers opened on any who have not previously been tagged.
Here again, this could be an effort to prevent the fund raiser being a success by scaring off potential guests, specially Persians who have family back home or may later wish to travel to Iran and then be arrested for anti-regime activity. The Mullahs could not care less that the funds would go to help children.
They are eerily afraid of the royalist movement and their ability to legitimately replace them.
Monday, April 05, 2010
OUR PEASANT OF A PRES__ENT (NO "ID) " LETHAL USURPER
Oba-Hussein disrespects/diminishes America by bowing to another Head of State
NBC Anchor Brian Williams bows to Oba-Hussein...... .
Sunday, April 04, 2010
GETTING WORSE AND WORSE!
Upset small businessemen are receiving money as donations to increase the number of billboards critical of Oba-HUssein being put up around the country. Apparently at last count some nine had gone up.
It is no longer a matter of politics, even the dirty kind this administration has been using like the Chicago thugs they are, it now verges on treason and treachery, which seems to be igniting Americans into an anti-Oba-Hussein regime stance. Just as they have been protesting the Mullah regime he continually protects and supports in Islamic Iran.
They are literally dying in their streets to obtain freedom while he is enslaving the naive USA population with his varied series of power grabs, aided and abetted by Mafiosa Nancy Pelosi and crooked Harry Reid and their cohorts.
Rearrange the letters in "PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA" and you get "AN ARAB BACKED IMPOSTER"~Coincidence?
With some now SIXTEEN States suing to repeal or block the "ill health care" bill there may be much that currently stinks in secret, appearing to full view in court and changing the course of our history from oppression under Oba-Hussein-Khomeini to a chance to repair all the damage he has inflicted already and is inflicting on a proud and honorable nation - excepting him and his radical supporters from that praise.
Does not bode well for anyone, so wake up America. We are in peril. All of us regardless of our opinons and political bent.
0bamas’ hidden records: Why are these off limits?
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records*
(Did Obama Actually Register for Selective Service?
*A supposed revelation of 0’s Selective Service records has been debunked here and here.)
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham’s divorce decree.
24 Why isn’t Barack Obama still a member of the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?
25 Why isn’t Michelle Obama still a member of the Illinois bar, after only about four years of practice, and where are all of the relevant documents?
Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.
It is no longer a matter of politics, even the dirty kind this administration has been using like the Chicago thugs they are, it now verges on treason and treachery, which seems to be igniting Americans into an anti-Oba-Hussein regime stance. Just as they have been protesting the Mullah regime he continually protects and supports in Islamic Iran.
They are literally dying in their streets to obtain freedom while he is enslaving the naive USA population with his varied series of power grabs, aided and abetted by Mafiosa Nancy Pelosi and crooked Harry Reid and their cohorts.
Rearrange the letters in "PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA" and you get "AN ARAB BACKED IMPOSTER"~Coincidence?
With some now SIXTEEN States suing to repeal or block the "ill health care" bill there may be much that currently stinks in secret, appearing to full view in court and changing the course of our history from oppression under Oba-Hussein-Khomeini to a chance to repair all the damage he has inflicted already and is inflicting on a proud and honorable nation - excepting him and his radical supporters from that praise.
Does not bode well for anyone, so wake up America. We are in peril. All of us regardless of our opinons and political bent.
0bamas’ hidden records: Why are these off limits?
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records*
(Did Obama Actually Register for Selective Service?
*A supposed revelation of 0’s Selective Service records has been debunked here and here.)
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham’s divorce decree.
24 Why isn’t Barack Obama still a member of the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?
25 Why isn’t Michelle Obama still a member of the Illinois bar, after only about four years of practice, and where are all of the relevant documents?
Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.
Friday, April 02, 2010
MILITARY SURGEON CHALLENGES OBAMA
BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Army suggests brain scan
for eligibility challenger
Flight surgeon questions Obama's
right to be commander in chief
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 01, 2010
By Bob Unruh
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WorldNetDaily
The U.S. Army is – unofficially – suggesting a brain scan and medical evaluation for an officer who announced he would refuse to follow further orders until and unless President Obama documents his constitutional eligibility to be commander in chief.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is the highest-ranking and first active-duty officer to refuse to obey orders based on President Obama's eligibility.
A spokeswoman for the developing case of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a flight surgeon with 18 years in the service, said the recommendation came to Lakin today from an officer whose name was not being used who implied that those higher up the chain of command thought it was a good idea.
The suggestion was described to WND by spokeswoman Margaret Calhoun Hemenway, a veteran Washington appointee and now volunteer spokeswoman, as being presented in a "solicitous" manner.
Officially, the U.S. Army says it has no plans for formal action at this point against the officer. But the controversy also raises the prospect that the government may be unwilling to pursue a prosecution because of the possible ramifications – including a defense demand for a court-ordered discovery process that would target Obama's historical documentation.
As WND reported, Lakin is an active-duty flight surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey's pilots and air crew.
The top-ranking, highly decorated officer says he's refusing all orders until Obama releases his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to prove his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.
"I feel I have no choice but the distasteful one of inviting my own court martial," Lakin said in a statement. "The Constitution matters. The truth matters."
He continued, "For the first time in all my years of service to our great nation, and at great peril to my career and future, I am choosing to disobey what I believe are illegal orders, including an order to deploy to Afghanistan for my second tour of duty there. I will disobey my orders to deploy because I – and I believe all servicemen and women and the American people – deserve the truth about President Obama's constitutional eligibility to the office of the presidency and the commander in chief.
"If he is ineligible, then my orders – and indeed all orders – are illegal because all orders have their origin with the commander in chief as handed down through the chain of command."
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!
Lakin is not the first active-duty officer to raise the challenge. Others have included Army doctor Capt. Connie Rhodes and Army reservist Maj. Stefan Cook. But Lakin is the highest-ranking officer to raise the question.
In a statement to WND today, George Wright of Army Public Affairs said the Army has "no reaction" to Lakin's statements, and "at this point, the Army will take no formal action."
He said, "Lt. Col. Lakin has stated his intent to violate Articles 87 and 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, but has not done so. Whether his actions to date violate any law or policy is for his chain of command to determine."
Wright said the Army had no information on in-channel concerns Lakin previously raised in 2009, and there was "no comment" on whether Obama needs to document his eligibility to serve as president under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that the commander in chief be a "natural born citizen."
Although a "natural born citizen" is undefined in the Constitution, many legal analysts believe the requirement was put there to prevent dual allegiances on the part of the president. Some believe those with dual citizenship would be ineligible. Obama wrote in his book his father was a subject to the United Kingdom, making Obama likely a dual citizen.
"Lt. Col Lakin is free to express his personal views. The Army has no comment on his concerns, nor the views that he espoused," Wright told WND.
Hemenway said the medical suggestions were delivered to Lakin today while he is on leave, only hours after WND contacted the Pentagon and Army headquarters, asking for comment.
She said the suggestion – at this point – remained "informal."
But the background already has been assembled in the case, should there be a prosecution, for the defense to come to court with specific demands for proof of the validity of the chain of command, up to the commander in chief.
Support for Lakin is being generated at the Safeguard Our Constitution.com website, established by the American Patriot Foundation.
One of the organizers behind the group, serving in emeritus status, is John Hemenway, an attorney who previously fought in the U.S. court system on behalf of a retired military officer, Gregory S. Hollister, who also questioned Obama's eligibility.
The case ultimately was dismissed by Judge James Robertson who ruled that the dispute had been "twittered" during the 2008 election campaign.
In that opinion, Robertson sarcastically wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his commander in chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven – to the colonel's satisfaction – that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president.
"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court," Robertson wrote.
The judge also suggested sanctions against Hemenway for bringing the case, and Hemenway responded that process then would provide him with a right to a discovery hearing to see documentation regarding the judge's statements – not supported by any evidence introduced into the case – that Obama was properly "vetted."
Hemenway warned at the time, "If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past.
"The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said.
WND columnist Vox Day earlier wrote about this very scenario, calling it a "Get out of war" free card.
The comments followed the case of Cook, the reservist who challenged his deployment orders over questions about their legality under Obama.
"Rather than contesting the suit," Day wrote, "the Army took the highly peculiar step of revoking the major's deployment order, suggesting that the Pentagon generals are not entirely confident that they can demonstrate the legitimacy of their purported commander in chief.
"The Pentagon's decision to back down rather than risk exposing Obama's birth records to the public means that every single American soldier, sailor, pilot and Marine now holds a 'get out of war free' card. Not only every deployment order, but every order issued from an officer in the line of command can now be challenged in the knowledge that the top brass are afraid to respond for fear that their commander could be exposed for a fraud.," he wrote at the time.
"It is one thing for Obama to deny the curiosity of the American public by hiding behind the courts. It is very much another for him to deny the right of the men and women of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, who are sworn to risk their lives upholding the Constitution of the United States of America, to be certain their orders are legitimate," he said.
Calhoun Hemenway, who separately writes for FamilySecurityMatters.org, told WND she is an unofficial spokeswoman for the case and that Lakin's legal counselors have suggested he not comment a great deal at this point while he is on leave and before he returns to his duties.
Calhoun Hemenway, a former White House appointee serving in the Department of Defense and at NASA, said the Lakin case presents a problem for the Army, since it cannot simply "rescind" orders as it has in previous military disputes over orders under Obama's chain of command.
That's because Lakin has indicated plans to reject all orders.
In his video message now posted on YouTube, Lakin, an 18-year veteran personally pleads with the president to stop withholding the key document which would put to rest many of the doubts that continue to linger more than a year into Obama's term.
"President Obama, I ask you to respect and uphold the Constitution. Be transparent and show your honesty and integrity. Release your original, signed birth certificate, if you have one, thus proving your birth on American soil, and thus assure the American people that you are lawfully eligible to hold the office of the presidency and serve as commander in chief of the Armed Forces."
At FSM, Calhoun Hemenway wrote, "LTC Lakin, a native of Colorado whose residency is Tennessee, has explained to his superiors that he cannot understand how his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution does not allow military officers to pursue proof of eligibility from the commander in chief. In fact, efforts on his part to seek affirmation of the president's constitutional eligibility have been met with legal evasions."
The website set up for his case reveals that he pursued two separate internal complaint procedures in 2009, trying to ascertain the needed information.
Despite the posting on the Internet of an electronic copy of a "Certification of Live Birth," more information is needed, Calhoun Hemenway wrote.
"The Western Journalism Center released an authoritative explanation of the Obama birth controversy that helps to explain the confusion on Capitol Hill which revolves mostly around Obama's online Certification of Live Birth (COLB)," she wrote.
That explanation says: "The Certification of Live Birth is not a copy of the original birth certificate. It is a computer-generated document that the state of Hawaii issues on request to indicate that a birth certificate of some type is 'on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.' And there is the problem. Given the statutes in force in 1961, the Certification of Live Birth proves nothing unless we know what is on the original birth certificate. There are several legal areas (involving ethnic quotas and subsidy) for which the state of Hawaii up until June 2009 did not accept its computer-generated Certification of Live Birth as sufficient proof of birth – or parentage – in Hawaii. Why should the citizens of the United States be content with lower standards for ascertaining the qualifications of their president?"
Obama's actual response to those who question his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement that the U.S. president be a "natural born citizen" has been to dispatch both private and tax-funded attorneys to prevent anyone from gaining access to his documentation.
Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
WND has reported on a multitude of cases that have been brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the office.
The issue has prompted a number of state legislatures to work on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.
The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.
The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Army suggests brain scan
for eligibility challenger
Flight surgeon questions Obama's
right to be commander in chief
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 01, 2010
By Bob Unruh
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WorldNetDaily
The U.S. Army is – unofficially – suggesting a brain scan and medical evaluation for an officer who announced he would refuse to follow further orders until and unless President Obama documents his constitutional eligibility to be commander in chief.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is the highest-ranking and first active-duty officer to refuse to obey orders based on President Obama's eligibility.
A spokeswoman for the developing case of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a flight surgeon with 18 years in the service, said the recommendation came to Lakin today from an officer whose name was not being used who implied that those higher up the chain of command thought it was a good idea.
The suggestion was described to WND by spokeswoman Margaret Calhoun Hemenway, a veteran Washington appointee and now volunteer spokeswoman, as being presented in a "solicitous" manner.
Officially, the U.S. Army says it has no plans for formal action at this point against the officer. But the controversy also raises the prospect that the government may be unwilling to pursue a prosecution because of the possible ramifications – including a defense demand for a court-ordered discovery process that would target Obama's historical documentation.
As WND reported, Lakin is an active-duty flight surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey's pilots and air crew.
The top-ranking, highly decorated officer says he's refusing all orders until Obama releases his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to prove his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.
"I feel I have no choice but the distasteful one of inviting my own court martial," Lakin said in a statement. "The Constitution matters. The truth matters."
He continued, "For the first time in all my years of service to our great nation, and at great peril to my career and future, I am choosing to disobey what I believe are illegal orders, including an order to deploy to Afghanistan for my second tour of duty there. I will disobey my orders to deploy because I – and I believe all servicemen and women and the American people – deserve the truth about President Obama's constitutional eligibility to the office of the presidency and the commander in chief.
"If he is ineligible, then my orders – and indeed all orders – are illegal because all orders have their origin with the commander in chief as handed down through the chain of command."
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!
Lakin is not the first active-duty officer to raise the challenge. Others have included Army doctor Capt. Connie Rhodes and Army reservist Maj. Stefan Cook. But Lakin is the highest-ranking officer to raise the question.
In a statement to WND today, George Wright of Army Public Affairs said the Army has "no reaction" to Lakin's statements, and "at this point, the Army will take no formal action."
He said, "Lt. Col. Lakin has stated his intent to violate Articles 87 and 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, but has not done so. Whether his actions to date violate any law or policy is for his chain of command to determine."
Wright said the Army had no information on in-channel concerns Lakin previously raised in 2009, and there was "no comment" on whether Obama needs to document his eligibility to serve as president under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that the commander in chief be a "natural born citizen."
Although a "natural born citizen" is undefined in the Constitution, many legal analysts believe the requirement was put there to prevent dual allegiances on the part of the president. Some believe those with dual citizenship would be ineligible. Obama wrote in his book his father was a subject to the United Kingdom, making Obama likely a dual citizen.
"Lt. Col Lakin is free to express his personal views. The Army has no comment on his concerns, nor the views that he espoused," Wright told WND.
Hemenway said the medical suggestions were delivered to Lakin today while he is on leave, only hours after WND contacted the Pentagon and Army headquarters, asking for comment.
She said the suggestion – at this point – remained "informal."
But the background already has been assembled in the case, should there be a prosecution, for the defense to come to court with specific demands for proof of the validity of the chain of command, up to the commander in chief.
Support for Lakin is being generated at the Safeguard Our Constitution.com website, established by the American Patriot Foundation.
One of the organizers behind the group, serving in emeritus status, is John Hemenway, an attorney who previously fought in the U.S. court system on behalf of a retired military officer, Gregory S. Hollister, who also questioned Obama's eligibility.
The case ultimately was dismissed by Judge James Robertson who ruled that the dispute had been "twittered" during the 2008 election campaign.
In that opinion, Robertson sarcastically wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his commander in chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven – to the colonel's satisfaction – that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president.
"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court," Robertson wrote.
The judge also suggested sanctions against Hemenway for bringing the case, and Hemenway responded that process then would provide him with a right to a discovery hearing to see documentation regarding the judge's statements – not supported by any evidence introduced into the case – that Obama was properly "vetted."
Hemenway warned at the time, "If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past.
"The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said.
WND columnist Vox Day earlier wrote about this very scenario, calling it a "Get out of war" free card.
The comments followed the case of Cook, the reservist who challenged his deployment orders over questions about their legality under Obama.
"Rather than contesting the suit," Day wrote, "the Army took the highly peculiar step of revoking the major's deployment order, suggesting that the Pentagon generals are not entirely confident that they can demonstrate the legitimacy of their purported commander in chief.
"The Pentagon's decision to back down rather than risk exposing Obama's birth records to the public means that every single American soldier, sailor, pilot and Marine now holds a 'get out of war free' card. Not only every deployment order, but every order issued from an officer in the line of command can now be challenged in the knowledge that the top brass are afraid to respond for fear that their commander could be exposed for a fraud.," he wrote at the time.
"It is one thing for Obama to deny the curiosity of the American public by hiding behind the courts. It is very much another for him to deny the right of the men and women of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, who are sworn to risk their lives upholding the Constitution of the United States of America, to be certain their orders are legitimate," he said.
Calhoun Hemenway, who separately writes for FamilySecurityMatters.org, told WND she is an unofficial spokeswoman for the case and that Lakin's legal counselors have suggested he not comment a great deal at this point while he is on leave and before he returns to his duties.
Calhoun Hemenway, a former White House appointee serving in the Department of Defense and at NASA, said the Lakin case presents a problem for the Army, since it cannot simply "rescind" orders as it has in previous military disputes over orders under Obama's chain of command.
That's because Lakin has indicated plans to reject all orders.
In his video message now posted on YouTube, Lakin, an 18-year veteran personally pleads with the president to stop withholding the key document which would put to rest many of the doubts that continue to linger more than a year into Obama's term.
"President Obama, I ask you to respect and uphold the Constitution. Be transparent and show your honesty and integrity. Release your original, signed birth certificate, if you have one, thus proving your birth on American soil, and thus assure the American people that you are lawfully eligible to hold the office of the presidency and serve as commander in chief of the Armed Forces."
At FSM, Calhoun Hemenway wrote, "LTC Lakin, a native of Colorado whose residency is Tennessee, has explained to his superiors that he cannot understand how his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution does not allow military officers to pursue proof of eligibility from the commander in chief. In fact, efforts on his part to seek affirmation of the president's constitutional eligibility have been met with legal evasions."
The website set up for his case reveals that he pursued two separate internal complaint procedures in 2009, trying to ascertain the needed information.
Despite the posting on the Internet of an electronic copy of a "Certification of Live Birth," more information is needed, Calhoun Hemenway wrote.
"The Western Journalism Center released an authoritative explanation of the Obama birth controversy that helps to explain the confusion on Capitol Hill which revolves mostly around Obama's online Certification of Live Birth (COLB)," she wrote.
That explanation says: "The Certification of Live Birth is not a copy of the original birth certificate. It is a computer-generated document that the state of Hawaii issues on request to indicate that a birth certificate of some type is 'on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.' And there is the problem. Given the statutes in force in 1961, the Certification of Live Birth proves nothing unless we know what is on the original birth certificate. There are several legal areas (involving ethnic quotas and subsidy) for which the state of Hawaii up until June 2009 did not accept its computer-generated Certification of Live Birth as sufficient proof of birth – or parentage – in Hawaii. Why should the citizens of the United States be content with lower standards for ascertaining the qualifications of their president?"
Obama's actual response to those who question his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement that the U.S. president be a "natural born citizen" has been to dispatch both private and tax-funded attorneys to prevent anyone from gaining access to his documentation.
Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
WND has reported on a multitude of cases that have been brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the office.
The issue has prompted a number of state legislatures to work on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.
The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.
The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment
Thursday, April 01, 2010
AT LAST SOME SANITY & LOGIC PREVAIL ABOUT ISLAM
Thanks to M. Kranz. This may be viewed at http://www.therealitycheck.org/?p=12844
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victory — Federal Judge Permits Father of Serviceman Killed on USS Cole to Express Opposition to Islamic Terrorism Over Objections of Marine Base Commander
Wonder why? Does our Moslem President set the tone?
ANN ARBOR, MI – Jesse Nieto is one of those many unsung patriotic Americans. He served 25 years in the Marine Corps, including two combat tours in Vietnam. His youngest son, Marc, and 16 of Marc’s shipmates were killed on October 12, 2000, by Islamic terrorists who bombed the USS Cole. Nieto has worked as a civilian employee at Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base in North Carolina since 1994.
Yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Malcolm J. Howard delivered good news to Mr. Nieto. He ruled that Camp Lejeune officials violated his free speech rights when they ordered him to remove decals attacking Muslim terrorists from his vehicle. Judge Howard enjoined Marine officials from further enforcing the ban against Nieto.
The rest of the story on political correctness run amuck follows.
Beginning in 2001, to show his anger toward the Muslim terrorists who killed his son, Nieto displayed various decals on his vehicle expressing anti-terrorist sentiments, such as “Remember the Cole, 12 Oct 2000, ” “Islam=Terrorism, ” and “We Died, They Rejoiced.” Based on a complaint from a Marine who is married to a Muslim, on July 31, 2008, two military police officers (MPs) issued Nieto a ticket for displaying “offensive material.”
After Nieto refused to remove the “offending” decals from his vehicle, the Base Magistrate issued Nieto a written order, ordering him to remove his vehicle from the base until all decals were removed and banning his vehicle from all other federal installations. The order in effect prevented Nieto from driving his vehicle to Arlington National Cemetery (a federal installation) to visit the grave marker of his fallen son.
As a result of the Marine Corps’ unlawful action, the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed a federal lawsuit against the Camp Lejeune Commanding Officer and the Base Magistrate on behalf of Nieto in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The civil rights lawsuit challenged the constitutionality of the military’s ban on Nieto’s speech.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “Political correctness is destroying our military. 9/11 was caused by Islamic terrorists, and our troops are being killed by Islamic terrorists overseas and on our very own military bases; yet, our commanders are more concerned about ‘diversity’ and not offending the Muslim community. And here, the military re-victimized a father anguishing over the murder of his son by Islamic terrorists because they don’t want to offend Muslims.”
During sworn testimony taken in the case, Marine officials admitted they would allow speech that favored Islam, but not Nieto’s speech because they considered it “extremist, indecent, and offensive.”
In his opinion, Judge Howard responded to the government’s argument as follows: “Defendants argue that the regulation is reasonable and necessary because it is aimed at preventing speech the sole intention of which is to inflame the passion of those within the Base command. However, defendants fail to recognize that pro Islamic messages, such as ‘Islam is Peace, ’ and ‘Islam is Love, ’ may be just as incendiary to individuals like plaintiff as anti-Islamic messages are to the individual who complained about plaintiff’s decals.”
Robert Muise, Senior Trial Counsel for the Law Center who handled the case, commented, “As Judge Howard’s well-reasoned opinion makes plain, political correctness and ‘diversity’ do not justify violating the Constitution. As a former Marine, I am ashamed at the way the Marine Corps treated this grieving father and war veteran. When I told him of the good news yesterday, he was elated. He plans to be back on base with his vehicle early next week.”
The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life. It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America. The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at http://www.thomasmore.org/ .
NEW TRAFFIC LAW - MOVE OVER ONE LANE OR REDUCE SPEED TO 20 BELOW LIMIT
In effect in California since January 1st 2010 - Heavy Fines!!!!
Only Maryland and Hawaii do not have this new law
For Officer Safety!!
http://www.moveoveramerica.com/
It is a fairly new law that states if any emergency vehicle is on the side of the road, if you are able, you are to move into the far lane. The cost of the ticket was $754, with 3 points on your license and a mandatory court appearance.
Please let everyone you know that drives about this new law. It is true
It is a fairly new law that states if any emergency vehicle is on the side of the road, if you are able, you are to move into the far lane. The cost of the ticket was $754, with 3 points on your license and a mandatory court appearance.
Please let everyone you know that drives about this new law. It is true
NETBOOK ON STEROIDS - DEFINITELY TESTED & RECOMMENDED
AntiMullah is TOTALLY NON-commercial and accepts no advertising nor any paid promotion, BUT...
Very occasionally we find something we acquire for our own use and discover it is worth sharing with others... worldwide.
This is one of those moments. This Asus 1201N (the brand Nerds like to use) is the third one we have bought.
The Asus (10" screen and REAL LIFE 10.5 hour battery life) Windows XP
http://www.portableone.com/product.asp?pf_id=1008HA-PU1X-BU
bought a few months ago is a very decent little unit for web browsing and even Microsoft Office uses. But it was not strong enough to use Dragon Speaking (voice to text) software we bought to write a book, so we got the 1201N Netbook on steroids....
Here are the basic specs - http://www.portableone.com/_e/loc/product/1201N-PU17-BK/ASUS_Eee_1201N_12_1_Atom_330_250GB_Up_to_8GB_RAM.htm
-12.1" 1366x768 (WXGA)
-Intel ATOM 330 1.6GHz Dual Core + NVIDIA ION Graphics
-2GB DDR2 RAM (upgradable to 8GB)
-250GB HHD (+500GB Internet Storage)
-Windows 7 Home Premium (Windows 7 Home Premium Preloaded ASUS Exclusive Utility: Super Hybrid Engine, SW:MS Works, MS Office 60-day Trial - Requires license to activate)
-802.11 b/g/n
-Integrated Bluetooth
--Up to 5 hour run time (Battery does not quite live up to this but recharge is very quick. A spare battery is now available. And the A/C adapter is small and portable)
-0.3MP Web cam with Digital Mic
-Built-in Stereo Speakers
-Video Ports: 1 (HDMI) & 1 (D-sub 15 pin)
-Audio jacks: 1 in/ 1 out
-3 USB 2.0 Ports
-Memory Card reader: MMC/SD(SDHC)
-10/100 Mbps / RJ-45
-3.21 lbs (with Battery)/ 11.65" x 8.19" x 1.07"~1.31" thin and about the size of a sheet of paper)
-1 Year Global Warranty, (6 months for battery, 30 days Zero Brite Dot Guaranteed)
-Color: Black (available now) Silver (back ordered till December) (PortableOne managed to get us one right away)
Customizable with lots of options
The 1201N Atom 330 processor is a DUAL CORE table top Intel inside this very light 12", great, clean display NETBOOK, into whIch we consolidated three other laptops and which is now our main unit. Generally crisp reaction times with this visually "cute toy" unit, which has received excellent reviews across the Internet.
Instead of a larger optional 7200 RPM hard drive, we settled for a Turbo state of the art SOLID STATE HARD DRIVE. Only 120Gb but no moving parts, no spinning disc, and NO NEED TO DEFRAGMENT - in fact do not ever defragment as it can damage the hard drive.
It added a rather large $570 or so to the unit price but increases battery life somewhat. Getting 4 Gb of memory installed (for the Dragon software) added to the price, which was way over what is needed for this unit with basic configuration.
For more details and lots of other laptops go to http://portableone.com/ Ask for Scott or Patrick. 1-800-650-4006 or 925-924-0558
They repair and service laptops for Asus and other manufacturers so provide an excellent FRIENDLY technical backup service if/when needed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


































