Wednesday, March 31, 2010


Look at whom we have helping Oba-Hussein run our country!
Maybe because he makes Oba-Hussein look intelligent
instead of like  an inexperienced, destructive Attila the Hun!

The same type of naive, assinine voter got BOTH of them into office!

Is this Georgia DEMOCRAT Congressman, Hank Joh!nson, who replaced  equally weird space cadet Cynthia McKinney, high on drugs? Or just naturally lacking enough functional brain cells to be coherent? Or even the appearance of some mental accuity! Good grief!

Be intelligent! Survive! Vote them all out!




Hear it from experts on Communism


German & Farsi narration with English sub-titles

20-year old video surfaces showing Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini on his death bed and "pressured" vote to appoint current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to his position.

Note: this plot was hatched between, (at that time) lowly cleric, Khamenei and Khomeini's son Ahmad (who was promptly murdered by Khamenei to hide the facts) and Rafsanjani co-operated with his parliamentary influence.

You had to be a Grand Ayatollah to assume the Supreme Ruler position and step into the shoes of the founder of the revolution, which with President Jimmuh the Idiot Carter's help still plagues the world.

Not to be outdone by Carter, Oba-Hussein insists on supporting the resulting Mullah regime and help them suppress their people and does his (clearly Moslem) best to assist their dream of wiping Israel off the face of the planet.

All the while threading increasingly parasitic Islamic 'sharia' into our culture riding into town on a Marxist-Islamist set of politically correct vehicles where only those dubbed "evil racists" dare to protest and they deserve to be marginalized - despite being an ever growing majority of the nation!

Tuesday, March 30, 2010


Already hidden in the " law of the land healthcare" bill is a provision to fund a medical "reserve" force who will be armed civilians! Obama is once again spouting about his nightmare CDF (Civi Defence Force) plan.

Based on his fear of our regular military rising against him as he shreds the Constitution, to which they have sworn an oath, he spouts that we "cannot rely on the military to protect us" and must thus have a Civilian Defence Force (swearing an oath to the Presidency he wants to perpetuate without term limits) that is as well funded and equipped as the Armed forces (and numbering around ONE MILLION people).

As part of his weakening of trained military pesonnel of any kind he is attacking the benefits - thus the ability to resist bullying - of our Veterans - and allocating those funds to his own Civiian Defence Forces.

Would that be constituted from the thousands of now "out of work" ACORN thugs? And perhaps include the tens of thousands of Palestinians he is importing into America? And be commanded by militant Black Panthers? And recruited from some of the 20 million illegal immigrants he wants to make legal?

All these groups owe their comforts and existence to the Obama Administration, which suppresses any legal or civil actions against them. Attorney General Eric Holder regularly drops or freezes cases against Moslems while going after patriotic Americans and labelling them as "domestic terrorists".

As items of the power grab bill, misnamed the healthcare bill appear, a horrified American populace - including many Democrats - are awakening to the warped policies it contains. And the weird, moronic, ill-intentioned mind sets of Obama, his unapproved czars and their Chicago mafia, UNCONSTITUTIONAL activities that should fall under RICOH (Organized Crime) laws and indictments, instead of being swept under the carpet as "politics".


From EMAIL: I thought that you should know what this health care plan is going to do to us retirees....Read Below. Subject: TRICARE and YOU Info we should all be aware of and may happen..... This is our 1st look at the bill. Finally, Tri-Care for Life Info. PASS THIS TO ALL MILITARY RETIREES

Please pass on to all your military retired friends so they can be educated on how the "health care reform" will change our tricare benefits. Read article at very bottom of e-mail string for more information. v/r This is true. It is on pages 77, 172, 218, and 434. You have to dig to see the charges.

We (retirees) would lose the Medicare for life benefit and would have to pay. We would lose TRICARE as a total care package. We would not be allowed to keep TRICARE so when Obama stands and says if you like what you have you can keep it, he lies. This is a "Heads Up" on a battle we are facing now and down the road with the new Administration.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has already drafted proposed legislation that would basically reduce our TRICARE for Life benefits to a system whereby we pay deductibles and co-pays up to $6,301 the first year for you and your spouse, with future years being indexed to increase with inflation. What can we do? The article below, obtained from an Air Force Association and written by BG Bob Clements, best describes what we can do.

Please read it and check the links for CBO language and do what Bob says-Send this email to every Military Retiree you know and write and email your Congressman often. For those of you that might have voted for "Change", you should do it more than often!

TRICARE FOR LIFE'S FUTURE.... TRICARE For Life was instituted to correct the broken promise that military retirees would receive free healthcare coverage for life and it covers the Medicare co-pay.

Now a heavy assault has begun on Veterans'/Retirees' benefits to pay for other programs our President promised during the campaign. And it is a high priority of his administration.

The one item of most interest to Retired Military is in Article 189. If approved by Congress the first assault wave would hit in 2011 and would hit hard. It would initiate cost sharing to require retirees to pay the first $525 of medical cost and 50% of the next $4,725 for a first year cost of $2,888 per person. It would be indexed to increase with inflation. A reason given for this action (for PR effect) is "overuse" by Retirees. For those of you who are covered by TFL you will want to pay attention (Below) to what BG Bob Clements has surfaced about the future of TFL.

In any case, on page 189 of the Congressional Budget Office report, see the note below on how to get to that spot, there is a strong recommendation to eventually eliminate the program as it is too expensive. Just another move to slight those of us who dedicated much of our adult lives to the defense of our country.

Strongly recommend that you contact your elected officials and register your strong opposition to the elimination of the TFL program.

Heads-up from BG Bob Clements,USAF Ret (P38 Bob). The following has been added to the Congressional Budget Office Web Site * * http://www.cbo/. gov/* * a. Budget, Options, Volume 1: Health Care * *(**www.cbo .. gov/doc.cfm? indexï¿?25* http://www.cbo/. gov/doc.cfm? index=9925*) For those who have never opened one of these web sites from OMB: * * 1) double click on the above URL * * 2) click on PDF * * 3) click on the binoculars * * 4) do a search for TFL .

Now here it is folks and I will guarantee if you sit around on your behind and do nothing about it as they bring these options forward this coming year, you will lose one of the best healthcare benefits that the Medicare eligible retired military have..It is short of the promises made that we fought so hard for back in the late 90s and early 2000s but it is still the best healthcare program that anyone in the United States has, bar none.

People who are professionals always look for the channel of least resistance when it comes to cutting money out of the Federal and DOD budget. I can tell you this straight on, military retirees are one of those channels of least resistance noted for sitting around, doing nothing, and waiting for ole Joe to do it for them.

You had better wake up. Your medical benefits are prime target. If you lose them, you have nobody to blame but yourself. Let me repeat that ... you have nobody to blame but yourself. The way to secure your benefits is to write to your members of Congress and to keep writing and writing and writing. ONCE IS NOT ENOUGH!! Keep repeating the above statement until you are blue in the face.

Now I'm going to make one more statement to all of you younger people out there who are not yet eligible for TRICARE for Life. HEALTH CARE WILL EVENTUALLY BECOME THE DOMINATING FACTOR IN YOUR LIFE. Remember that . . . . it will impact you big time with the utmost in cruelty unless you are fortunate enough to die from a heart attack or get run over by a truck.

The service organizations will put up a fight, but, they will need your help and can't do it by themselves.

I hope this makes it clear as to what you can expect if you do nothing. To show you how stupid these professionals can be at times just read the data on the noted sites closely. You will see that in spite of the MTFs (Military Treatment Facility) need to get patients back to keep their doctors busy and the hospitals from going to clinic status, these people from OMB would employ a means to keep retirees from using MTF facilities by charging them a fee for services. How dumb can you get.

If you know of anyone who is Retired Military, Please forward this on to them. Remember- TFL is an "Earned Benefit" that's been granted by a previous Congress. *

Monday, March 29, 2010



With this kind of blatant, open opposition to what Obama is doing to our country, perhaps it is little wonder that Obama has ordered raids on American militias and wants to control doctors by enlisting them in a military MEDICAL reserve, which will carry sidearms and thus override the freedoms of States to regulate within their own borders.

The Oba-Hussein thuggery appears to be pushing us into a new, nasty confrontation, thus providing him an excuse to suspend Constitutional rights and declare emergency martial law, suspend elections and rule by presidential decree -








Since there is so much to read and study in these two books of sayings, religious instructions and Sharia behavior and contractual obligations, the link to this article and to the FULL TEXT of the  books  in English is now posted under the "blinking eye" graphic in the left hand column for easy repeated reference and educational purposes.

Note 1: someone, "almost certainly"  inside Google has already tried to corrupt the link to one of the books to hide the contents and we had to repair it.

Note 2: AGAIN someone "more certainly in Google" prevented the graphic below from loading through Google and another "repair" had to be made!

And they complain about Chinese censorship???

Doctor, heal thyself! Remove the bad apple in your tech department, who has awoken after an absence and AGAIN imposes his/her views, preferences. Let them start their own site to air their mindsets, not destroy/censor others'.

BE WELL, BE HAPPY AND THRIVE (while we all still can)

Oba-Hussein-Khomeini health care medication

Oba Bottle3

Tuesday, March 23, 2010



Here are some excerpts from “Tahrirolvasyleh” which Muslims probably don’t want you to know about Shia Islam:

"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven. ["Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth edition*, Qom, Iran, 1990]

*This version is a very cleaned up, very edited version of the original Arabic text, a much more explicit (crude) book that was siphoned off the face of the planet after the 1979 revolution by the Mullah regime and banned.

Possession of it will incurr the death penalty. Even the edited version can bring prison and execution.

A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighbouring village is reasonable.

If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned.

Wine and all intoxicating beverages are impure, but opium and hashish are not.

If a man sodomises the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.

During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform ablutions.

A woman who has contracted a continuing marriage does not have the right to go out of the house without her husband’s permission; she must remain at his disposal for the fulfilment of any one of his desires, and may not refuse herself to him except for a religiously valid reason.

If she is totally submissive to him, the husband must provide her with her food, clothing, and lodging, whether or not he has the means to do so. A woman who refuses herself to her husband is guilty, and may not demand from him food, clothing, lodging, or any later sexual relations; however, she retains the right to be paid damages if she is repudiated.

If a father (or paternal grandfather) marries off his daughter (or granddaughter) in her absence without knowing for a certainty that she is alive, the marriage becomes null and void as soon as it is established that she was dead at the time of the marriage.

It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her. ["The Little Green Book"]

If a man commits adultery with an unmarried woman, and subsequently marries her, the child born of that marriage will be a bastard unless the parents can be sure it was conceived after they were married. A child born of an adulterous father is legitimate. Ali [son in law of Mohammed], having cut off the hands of two thieves, treated their wounds and offered them his hospitality, and this affected them so much that they became utterly devoted to him; or again when he heard that the marauding army of Muawiyah had abused a woman of one of the tribes, he was so upset and moved to pity he declared: “If a man died after such an occurrence, no one could blame him.” And yet, despite a nature as sensitive as that, Ali bared his sword and hacked the perpetrators to pieces. This is the meaning of justice.- “The Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious” (The Little Green Book), ISBN number 0-553-14032-9.

Paedophilia legal in Iran?

In June, 2002 Iranian authorities approved a law raising the age at which girls can marry without parental consent from 9 to 13. The elected legislature actually passed the bill in 2000, but the “Guardian Council”, a 12-man body of conservative clerics, vetoed it as contradicting Islamic Sharia law. Iran’s clerical establishment insists that the marriage of young girls is a means to combat immorality.

The Expediency Council, which arbitrates between the elected parliament and the theocratic Guardian Council, timidly passed the measure. The law however does not change the age at which children can get married (nine for girls and 14 for boys), but says that girls below the age of 13 and boys younger than 15 need their parents’ permission and the approval of a “Righteous Court.” Reformists state that the new law does not protect children, since most of those who marry at such a young age do so by force.

A religious decree by Khomeini ordered that girl prisoners who are virgins must be raped before execution, to prevent them from entering heaven. A Guard conducts the rape the night before execution. The next day, a marriage certificate is issued by a mullah, who sends it to the girl’s family, along with a box of chocolates (sweets) as a wedding gift.

It is quite common in Iran for older men to marry children, as long as they pay the appropriate bride-price to the girl’s family. This basically means that a father can sell his daughter to whomever he wants, whilst the mad mullahs see this as a means of maintaining purity.

We prefer to call this child prostitution and rape, especially given that Iran’s clerics approve of the ‘tradition’ of ‘temporary marriage’ (Mut’a), which can last less than 24 hours and may be repeated as many times as desired. This form of exploitation is widespread and legitimises sex with young children. The man may even visit his temporary wife every weekend at her father’s house, for about $10 per visit.

Khomeini on prostitution and Mut’a (temporary marriage)

“It is permissible to do Mut’a with an adulteress, but with aversion, particularly if she is a well-known prostitute. If Mut’a is done with her, she should be told to give-up her profession.”



hat tip


Alan note: will the Obama, corrupt Chicago political system he has installed in Washington D.C., (including his instrusive, unelected, unconfirmed czars) finally find a legal confrontation when so many Americans are rising up against it?

Will legal challenges by State Attorney Generals elicit his secrets and show he is not eligible to be in the White House?

Will the almost lone voice (with a couple of others) of Orly Taitz suddenly become a chorus of dissent and accusation by States that FINALLY PROVIDES AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FACTS SHE RAISES BELOW?

And disclose reality one way or the other by shining light on them and making them appear into the public view instead of buried - at apparently  considerable amounts of lawyer fees to Obama - in an array of legal obstacles to hide the truth?


Dr. Orly Taitz, esq 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688 Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603 E-Mail:






Barack Hussein Obama,
John Doe 1-100



Civil Action: 10-151 RCL















The court has jurisdiction under DC statute §§16-3501- 16-3503. Federal court is proper as diversity between the parties exist and the case revolves around the Federal Question of eligibility of the President under Quo Warranto


Plaintiff – Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ- hereinafter “Taitz.” The plaintiff is a resident of California and president of the Defend Our Freedoms foundation. She is a Doctor of Jurisprudence and a Doctor of Dental Surgery. Through her foundation she has popularized Constitution and fought violations of Constitution and civil liberties of UC citizens.

As part of her work she has filed numerous legal actions, representing over 200 US citizens: State Representatives of different states, candidates on the ballot and high ranked members of US military. Her clients are seeking release of original vital records of Barack Hussein Obama, to see if he is eligible for US presidency.

As of now in spite of over 100 legal actions filed all over the Nation by some 13 licensed attorneys and numerous pro se plaintiffs and in spite of 12 citizen grand jury presentments and indictments, Obama refused to provide any vital records that would be acceptable in any court of law.

Respondent/Defendant – Barack Hussein Obama, hereinafter “Obama”, Acting President of the United States and Commander in Chief, who refused to present in any court of law or to the public any vital records that would show his eligibility as for US presidency based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution, as one born in the United States to two citizen parents without allegiance to any other sovereignties.

From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.


Taitz is an attorney and she has submitted to Attorney General Eric Holder and US Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeffrey Taylor a request to file Quo Warranto, to ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency .

After 9 months of waiting she did not receive any response from either Attorney General or US attorney for the district of Columbia. She is seeking an ex-relator status to proceed with Quo Warranto.

As Taitz tried to ascertain Obama’s legitimacy as an attorney, representing her clients, she was subjected to vicious attacks coming from the media acting as regime official propaganda, from Obama’s supporters and from some judiciary, acting as tools to silence her and intimidate her into dropping her legal actions.

She was subjected to numerous death threats, tampering with her car, when an emissions hose was disconnected and hot combustible fumes were going back to the engine, as she was driving with her three children in the car.

Several convicted criminals and document forgers were hired by someone and used in concert to submit perjured affidavits to court and to forge her signature, in an attempt to influence the judiciary and undermine her in the eyes of the community and undermine her law license.

Her foundation web site was repeatedly hacked and destroyed. Her pay-pal account was tampered with. On 01.21.09. her case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court of the United States only two days before it was supposed to be heard in conference by all nine justices.

After a year and a half of repeated complaints to law enforcement, she could not get any assistance or relief. When she brought two legal actions in the Middle District of Georgia on behalf of the members of the US military, as a form of intimidation and retaliation, she was sanctioned $20,000. Taitz is seeking not only verification of Obama’s legitimacy under Quo Warranto, but financial compensation for damages suffered as well as compensation for the severe emotional distress suffered as a result of the defendant’s actions.

Taitz has also submitted request for disclosure of pertinent information under the Freedom Of Information Act from Social Security Administration under 5 USC 552 (b)(6), her request was denied by Dawn S. Wiggins, FOIA officer of the SSA, Taitz is appealing this above denial.

Taitz is a Republican candidate on the ballot, running for the position of the Secretary of State of CA. Based on prior legal action, it is clear, that if elected, Taitz will demand from Obama all proper vital records to prove his legitimacy for presidency. As Taitz has filed her Declaration of Candidacy, her whole family, including her 3 children were subjected to vicious intimidation and harassment campaign.

Here come the plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ and alleges, that District of Columbia jurisdiction allows Quo Warranto ex relator status in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States, civil and military”. D.C. Code §§16-35-1-3503. Quo Warranto is the mechanism of redress of grievances going back to Magna Carta.

The foundation of inviolability of Constitution as supreme law was codified in Magna Carta (1215): “ . .we have granted all these concessions, desirous that they should enjoy them in complete and firm endurance forever, we give and grant to them the underwritten security,. . . so that if we, or our justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our officers, shall in anything be at fault towards anyone, or shall have broken any one of the articles of this peace or of this security, and the offense be notified . . .laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay. . . . And we shall procure nothing from anyone, directly or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such things has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never use it personally or by another.” Magna Carta 17 John § 61 (1215) (Avalon)

The supremacy and inviolability of Constitution is shown by ongoing rulings that laws or actions are “void and null”, “null and void”, “void”, or “null” etc. e.g., Chief Justice John Marshall affirmed this constitutional supremacy in Marbury v. Madison, observing:

“Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, 176 - Supreme Court 1803

However, Magna Carta codified the supremacy and inviolability of constitution over both the Executive (“We”/the King) and the Judiciary (“justiciar”/Chief Justice). Thus paraphrasing Marbury at 178:

“So if a [doctrine] be in opposition to the constitution; if both the [doctrine] and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the [doctrine], disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the [doctrine]; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.”

J. Marshall further emphasized the judicial oath:

“Why otherwise does it direct the judges to take an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner, to their conduct in their official character. How immoral to impose it on them, if they were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support!” Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, 179 - Supreme Court 1803

The Plaintiff is seeking to uphold explicit Article II and Amendment XX qualification requirements and grant access (“standing”) under Article VI supremacy and oath. Any citizen has standing to uphold the Right to redress of grievances under 1st, 9th amendment. Additionally, 16-3502,3503 does not limit ex relator status to any particular group and does not require any particular damages, however there is a heightened right to redress of grievances for an attorney who was subjected to sanctions, intimidation and harassment, while she tried to represent her clients seeking to specifically redress such grievance.

There is an additional heightened standing for a Candidate on the ballot, running for the position of the Secretary of State, where a big part of her campaign is legitimacy of elections, and where she and her three children and her whole family are being threatened, harassed and intimidated with death threats, her car is being tampered with, and she is threatened with loss of her livelihood.

The plaintiffs have filed both with the Attorney General Eric Holder and the US Attorney Jeffrey A. Taylor and his successor Channing Phillips a request for Quo Warranto in March and April of 2009 respectively. Hundreds of concerned citizens have called the Department of justice demanding a response to Quo Warranto submission. No response was received for ten months. Letters, e-mails, faxes went unanswered. Employees of the justice department were slamming phones in the face of the citizens calling and urging a response, even when those calls came from high ranking officers of US military.

This game of hide and seek by the Attorney General Holder and US attorneys played with the plaintiffs and their counselor is infantile at best and treasonous at worst, as National Security is on the line. Recent near tragedy of NorthWest 253, slaughter of CIA agents and tragedy at Fort Hood are only a few reminders of how dangerous it is to have a Big Question Mark with numerous stolen and fraudulent social security numbers sitting in the position of the President and Commander in Chief.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned counsel respectfully requests this Honorable Court to grant Leave of Court to file Quo Warranto as ex-relator in the name of the United States of America against Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States.

Writ of Quo Warranto


I. What is Respondent Obama’s standard and burden of proof of his birthplace under Quo Warranto and ethical duties? - Considering Obama’s first cousin Raela Odinga, Prime Minister of Kenya, sealed alleged records of Obama’s birth in Mombasa; while the State of Hawaii holds Obama’s “original” sealed birth records, allows registration of births out of State, allows registration based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence and seals original birth records.

II. Does the State of Hawaii’s withholding Respondent’s Obama’s original birth records by privacy laws breach the U.S. Const. by obstructing constitutional rights duties of the People to vote, and State and Federal election officers to challenge, validate & evaluate qualifications of presidential candidates based on legally acceptable and not fraudulent records and the President Elect., per U.S. Const. art. II § 1, art. VI, & amend. XX § 3?

III. Does the restrictive qualification for President of “natural born citizen” over “citizen” include allegiance to the U.S.A. from birth without any foreign allegiance, as required of the Commander in Chief in time of war to preserve the Republic, including birth within the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. to parents who both had U.S. citizenship at that birth, and having retained that undivided loyalty?

IV. Does birth to or adoption by a non-citizen father or mother incur foreign allegiance sufficient to negate being a “natural born citizen” and disqualify a candidate from becoming President?

V. Having attained one’s majority, do actions showing divided loyalty with continued allegiance to the foreign nationality of one’s minority evidence foreign allegiance sufficient to disqualify one from being a “natural born citizen” with undivided loyalty to the U.S.A., such as campaigning for a candidate in a foreign election, or traveling on a foreign passport?

VI. Does a presidential candidate or President Elect by default fail to qualify under U.S. Const., art. II § 2 and amend. XX, § 3, if they neglect their burden to provide State or Federal election officers prima facie evidence of each of their identity, age, residence, and natural born citizenship, sufficient to meet respective State or Federal statutory standards?

VII. Do candidates for office disqualify themselves if they seek office under a birth name differing from a name given by adoption, or vice versa, when they neglect to provide election officers prima facie evidence of legal changes to their name, or if they neglect to legally change their name?

VIII. Does a President elect fail to qualify through breach of ethical disclosure duties, and obstruction of election officers’ constitutional duties to challenge, validate and evaluate qualifications for President, by withholding or sealing records evidencing identity, age, residency, or allegiance, or by claiming privacy and opposing in court efforts by Electors, election officers, or the People to obtain and evaluate such records?

IX. Does misprision by Federal election officers cause a President Elect to fail to qualify, if they neglect or refuse to challenge, validate, or evaluate qualifications of Electors or a President Elect, being bound by oath to support the Constitution and laws, after citizens provided information challenging those qualifications via petitions for redress of grievance, or by law suits?

X. To uphold its supremacy and inviolability, and to preserve the Republic, does the U.S. Constitution grant standing to Citizens to bring suit or quo warranto over negligence, obstruction, misprision, or breach of constitutional duties, and protect the People’s rights?

Here come the plaintiffs/ ex-relators in the name of the United States of America praying this Honorable Court issue Quo Warranto writ against Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States and Commander in Chief.

Ex Relators are seeking Quo Warranto under District of Columbia Codes §§16-3501-16-3503 which provides for the “Writ of Quo Warranto to be issued in the name of the United States of America against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military”.

The ex-relators assert that respondent Obama has indeed usurped the franchise of the President of the United States and the Commander in Chief of the United States Military forces due to his ineligibility and non-compliance with the provision of the Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States that provides that the President of the United States has to be a Natural Born Citizen for the following reasons:

The legal reference and legal definitions used by the framers of the Constitution was the legal treatise “The Law of Nations” by Emer De Vattel as quoted and referenced in the Article 1, Section 8. The Law of Nations defines “…Natural Born Citizens, are those in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the conditions of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

Book 1, Chapter 19, §212. In his book Dreams From my Father as well as on his web site Fight the Smears respondent Obama admitted to the fact that his father was never a US citizen, but rather a British citizen from a British colony of Kenya and based on British Nationality act respondent Obama was a British citizen at birth and a Kenyan citizen from age 2 on December 12, 1961 when Kenya became an independent nation. As such, for the reason of his allegiance to foreign nations from birth respondent Obama never qualified as a Natural Born citizen.

In spite of some 100 legal actions filed and 12 Citizen Grand Jury presentments and indictments Respondent Obama due to his ineligibility never consented to unseal any prima facie documents and vital records that would confirm his legitimacy for presidency.

The state of Hawaii statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborative evidence from any hospital.

Respondent Obama refused to unseal a birthing file (labor and delivery file) evidencing his birth from the Kapiolani Hospital where he recently decided, that he was born.

Similarly, respondent Obama refused to consent to unseal his original birth certificate from the Health Department in the state of Hawaii. The original birth certificate is supposed to provide the name of the hospital, name of the attending physician and signatures of individuals in attendance during birth.

As such there is no verifiable and legally acceptable evidence of his birth in the state of Hawaii.

Circa 1995 Respondent Obama has made an admission in his book Dreams from My Father that he has a copy of the original birth certificate, when describing a certain article about his father he write “…I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms…”

In spite of the fact that respondent Obama has a copy of his original birth certificate, he released for public consumption only a COLB, an abbreviated certification of life birth which was issued in 2007 and does not provide any verifying information, such as name of the hospital and name of the attending physician and signatures, which infers that he knows that he is not eligible and actively trying to obfuscate the records in order to usurp US presidency.

An affidavit from one of the most prominent forensic document experts, Sandra Ramsey Lines, previously submitted to this court, states that authenticity of COLB and inference of the US birth cannot be ascertained based on COLB alone without examining the original birth certificate in Hawaii, that respondent Obama refuses to unseal and present in court and to the public at large.

As respondents schools records from Indonesia, previously submitted, show him the citizen of Indonesia under the name of Barry Soetoro, and there is no evidence of legal name change upon his repatriation from Indonesia, there is a high likelihood of the scenario whereby the respondent was sworn in as a president not only illegitimately due to his allegiance to three foreign nations, but also under a name that was not his legal name at the time of inauguration and swearing in as the president.

Affidavits from licensed private investigators Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels, previously submitted to this court, show that according to national databases respondent Obama has used as many as 39 different social security numbers, none of which were issued in Hawaii, which in itself is an evidence of foreign birth.

Most egregious is the fact that the respondent has used for most of his life in Somerville Massachusetts, Chicago, Illinois and currently in the White House SSN XXX-XX-4425, which was issued in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1979 and assigned to an individual born in 1890, who would have been 120 years old, if he would be alive today.

Respondent never resided in the state of Connecticut and he is clearly not 120 years old.

There is such a high probability of criminal acts of identity theft and social security fraud committed by the respondent that the undersigned requests this Honorable court to use its inherent powers to order Sua Sponte an evidentiary h earing on this particular issue for possible criminal prosecution of identity theft and social security fraud, as the respondent has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of this Honorable court and can be brought to a separate evidentiary hearing to ascertain if fraud was perpetrated upon the court by assertion of false identity, even if the underlying case is not heard or closed for one reason or another.

The undersigned requests to bar the US attorney’s office from representing the respondent in such hearing based on US Code 44 Section 22 and due to obvious inherent conflict of interest.


1. Plaintiff re-alleges everything previously plead, incorporates by reference and alleges the following:

2. Defendant knows that his social security number starts with digits 042, which is assigned to the state of CT.

3. Defendant knows that the social security number he is using was issued in the state of CT to another individual, who was born in 1890.

4. Defendant was served by the plaintiff with pleadings, where above information was provided to the defendant.

5. Defendant has a copy of his original birth certificate from HI.

6. Defendant has his school enrolment records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard University.

7. Defendant knew that his vital records do not provide basis for his assertion of legitimacy for US presidency under Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution.

8. Defendant committed fraud and misrepresentation of material facts by placing his name on the ballot as a legitimate candidate for presidency.

9. Defendant committed fraud by taking an oath of president of the United States.

10. Plaintiff represents some 200 plaintiffs and on behalf of those plaintiffs sought release of the defendants above mentioned vital records .

11.Plaintiff was subjected to over a year of intimidation, harassment, retaliation, sanctions, ridicule, death threats due to the fact that she tried to unseal the above vital records, showing the plaintiff illegitimate for presidency and committing fraud.

12.Plaintiff has suffered severe mental anguish and distress and financial damages as a result directly attributable to the Plaintiff’s conduct and actions.

Qui Tam


Due to the fact that neither Attorney General Eric Holder nor US Attorney for the District of Columbia respondent to the Quo Warranto demand, plaintiff is seeking a leave of court for ex relator pursuant to the federal False Claims Act, 31 USC 3729- 3733 as well against the defendant/respondent Barack Hussein Obama as further attempts to elicit respond from the Attorney General or US attorney will be futile.

1. The relater re- alleges previously plead, incorporates by reference and pleads the following:

2. This cause of action arises under the federal False Claims Act found at 31 USC 3729 through 3733. This particular District Court for the District of Columbia affords the proper venue for this action in that the defendant has submitted within the District of Columbia his false and wrongful claim for the payment of monies by the United States Government and the Department of the Treasury located also within the District of Columbia .

3. A right of private party to proceed in Qua Tam was upheld in Vermont v. United States, 529 US 765 (2000)

4. The United States Government is the party on whose behalf the relator also brings this action, as well as on his own behalf, as required by the False Claims Act.

5. Defendant/ respondent did not fulfil the Constitutional requirement of Natural Born Citizen.

6. Defendant / respondent has received a salary as a President and Commander in chief in Violation of the False Claims act USC 3729 through 3733.

WHEREFORE, pursuant to the procedures and remedies set forth in the federal False Claims Act, relator, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Government of the United States of America demands enforcement of Qui Tam MOTION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION UNDER 5USC 552 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PLAINTIFF re-alleges all of the above, incorporates by reference and alleges the following:

1. Plaintiff has requested information from the Social Security administration seeking explanation, why the defendant is using Social security numbers of other individuals and numbers that were never assigned and what action is Social Security administration is taking to prosecute this conduct.

2. Plaintiff received a response from a SSA FOIA officer, Dawn S. Wiggins, denying her request due to privacy.

3. Attached affidavit of investigator Sankey shows 39 different social security numbers connected to Barack Obama or Barry Obama. When one is using (x) multiple social security numbers, clearly at least (x-1) or (x) numbers are being used fraudulently, whereby there is no right to privacy or expectation of privacy in a fraudulent use of the social security numbers of others or numbers that were never assigned.

4. Plaintiff is damaged and will be more damaged in the near future, if the applications for the Social Security numbers listed in the above reports are not disclosed, and explanation is not provided by what right, by what warrant Defendant is using or have been those Social Security numbers.

5. Plaintiff is seeking a Writ of Mandamus from this Honorable Court to obtain the above information from Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.


1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference everything alleged previously and alleges the following:

2. Plaintiff is a Doctor of Dental Surgery, licensed by the state of California.

3. Plaintiff owns and operates a dental practice at 29839 Santa Margarita PKWY, Rancho Santa Margarita CA.

4. Currently US House of Representatives is set approve via reconciliation one of two versions of the Health Bill (House Bill HR 3962 and “Senate Bill” to be reconciled in the House as HR 3590 are substantially Different).

Defendant has repeatedly stated that if such bill is passed and reconciled as early as next week, he will immediately sign it into law in spite of general public outcry against such bill. This signing of the bill is imminent as Defendant, his administration and Democratic party leadership have engaged forceful arm twisting and de-facto bribery of US Senators in order to push passing of such bill, whereby Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana got a 100 million dollar de-facto bribe (Better known as a new “Louisiana Purchase”), senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut got 300 million de-facto bribe and Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska got an infinity amount of dollars de facto bribe to sign the Senate version of such bill.

5. Defendant has never provided any vital records to show that he is legitimate to hold position of the President and sign such bill into law.

6. Plaintiff will be directly affected by such bill, if signed into law as early as next week.

7. Health bill, as being prepared and reconciled, will create an enormous machine of governmental burocracy which will intrude into Plaintiff’s practice, will affect her doctor-patient relations, will undermine her Hippocratic oath, will force her to ration medical care and de-facto deny medical care to elderly, whom some committees of burocrats will deem to be too old to receive such care, meaning too old to live.

8. Such bill will subject her to threat of multiple Medical-Dental malpractice legal actions as standard of care will clearly go down.

9. Such bill will constitute unreasonable infringement upon her gainful employment in Dental Surgery as overburdening of interstate commerce in clear violation of commerce clause.

10.Wherefore the Plaintiff seeks a writ of Mandamus, seeking release of the Defendant’s vital records, such as his original birth certificate, his college and university enrollment records, social security application and passport application records to verify his legitimacy to sign Health Bill HR 3590 or HR 3962 or any other bill under the Natural Citizen requirement of the Article 2, Section 1and seeking a declaratory relief deeming Health Bill HR 3590 and HR 3962 null and void as violating Commerce clause and not signed by a legitimate President of the United States. Violation of Plaintiff’s Civil rights under 42 USC 1983, 42 USC 1985.

Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all of the above and alleges following

1. Plaintiff is one of two Republican candidates on the ballot in the state of CA. Democrat candidate on the ballot is an incumbent Debra Bowen.

2. Plaintiff’s children were intimidated and harassed with e-mails stating that their mother will be thrown in prison and committed to mental institution.

They received paintings of their mother, depicted nude, giving birth and holding a bloody placenta, titled “Birther Orly Taitz”. This was clearly done to intimidate and harass not only Taitz’s children but also Taitz, herself, and pressure her into dropping out of the race, as well as to cause her and her whole family severe mental anguish. Plaintiff has filed a criminal complaint with Orange County Registrar of Voters, Mr. Neal Kelley. (Exhibit –Criminal complaint, filed with the Registrar of Voters)

3. Mr.Kelley has called in response to the complaint and stated that it will be forwarded to the Secretary of State Debra Bowen, who has an investigative unit.

4. In and around the time of the incidents of harassment Plaintiff has received a copy of a campaign mailer sent by the campaign of Debra Bowen, Secretary of State, who is a top official, would be investigating the Plaintiff’s complaint.

5. Bowen’s mailer states ”Please contribute today to help Debra stand against right-wing ideoloques like Orly Taitz”…”…Her (Taitz) primary reason for running is to challenge President Obama’s citizenship and invalidate the 2008 election. In Fact, Taitz has sued Debra twice to try to invalidate Obama’s victory. We can’t let fringe conspiracy theories use this office to get a foot in the door and undermine our democracy”..’ “please donate $25 or more today so Debra can defeat Orly Taitz…” Exhibit Flier from Debra Bowen.

6. Clearly Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, cannot expect any impartiality or any assistance, when the governmental official, Secretary of State, who is supposed to investigate intimidation, harassment, hate crimes against Taitz and her children and her whole family, as related to elections, is the one who is spreading absolutely despicable defamatory, slanderous statements about Taitz, is the one who is masterminding the hysteria against Taitz, which in turn leads to hate crimes against Taitz and her family.

7. Such behavior clearly shows violation of voting rights and Plaintiff’s rights to be an un-intimidated candidate on the ballot. Secretary of State Bowen acted for the benefit and as a de-facto agent of the Defendant, whereby she admits in her own flier, that there is a threat of invalidation of Obama’s election, if Taitz is elected. This represents a violation of Plaintiff’s rights under 42 USC 1983 and 42 USC 1985.

8. Defendant’s unwillingness to unseal any and all of his vital records only fuels such attacks on Taitz and behavior of officials directed towards aiding and abetting of consealment of such records obstruction of records and violation of Taitz civil rights under the color of authority.

9. Wherefore Plaintiff seeks an adjudication in her favor and determination that her civil rights under 42 USC 1983 and 42 USC 1985 were violated and she seeks damages incurred as a result of such violation.


1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all of the above and alleges the following:

2. Fraud, as described and alleged previously constitutes a predicate act under RICO

3. Violation of 42 USC 1983 and 1985 constitutes a predicate act under RICO.

4. On January 21st of 2009 my case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court. This suggests aiding and abeting in commission of fraud and a corrupt organization with a common scheme to defraud the country. As further investigation is necessary, the plaintiff cannot state prior to discovery, who was engaged in erasing of records.

5. On October 1st, 2009 Sidharth Velamoor, attorney for Perkins Coie, Obama’s defense firm, where Robert Bauer, White House Chief Counsel, is a partner was hired as a clerk for Judge David O. Carter.

Shortly thereafter Judge Carter has changed his opinion and decided that he no longer has jurisdiction to hear Barnett et al V Obama et al, which dealt with Obama’s illegitimacy to presidency. Those actions suggest improper influence on the Federal judge in an effort to affect the outcome of the litigation, where defendant was likely to be found illegitimate to presidency.

Those facts suggest violation of the civil rights of Taitz, an attorney on the case, and her clients under 42 USC 1983, which constitutes a predicate act under RICO.

6. Licensed investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey have provided affidavits, showing Obama using multiple Social Securty numbers, none of which were issued in Hawaii, which indicates violation of 42 USC 408 (a)(7)(b), a predicate act under RICO.(Exhibits Affidavits of Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey)

7. John Sampson, Retired Senior Deportation Officer of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS ICE), recipient of advanced training from federal Law Enforcement Center, currently a private investigator has provided an affidavit, showing that the Defendant has used a social security number, issued in the state of Connecticut, while he resided in HI.

Both investigator Sampson and Sankey were subjected to retaliation and their privileges to use National databases were rescinded in retaliation, upon them providing Taitz with the information showing the defendant fraudulently using Social Security numbers of others. This is indicative of fraud, obstruction of Justice, Social Security Fraud and Identity theft- all predicate acts under RICO.

8. Plaintiff is seeking to plead RICO more fully upon conducting and completion of discovery, which is currently impeded due to plaintiff’s refusal to unseal any and all information and due to the Fact that governmental officials, currently not named, are aiding and abetting in such obfuscation of records.


1. Plaintiff ex-relator in the name of the United States of America is requesting this Honorable Court to issue a writ of Quo Warranto against a respondent Barack Hussein Obama and order an evidentiary hearing whether fraud upon the court was committed and whether criminal charges should be brought against the respondent for fraud, identity theft and social security fraud.

2.Pursuant to the procedures and remedies set forth in the federal False Claims Act, Plaintiff-ex relator, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Government of the United States of America demands enforcement of Qui Tam

3.Wherefore the Plaintiff seeks a writ of Mandamus, seeking release of the Defendant’s vital records, such as his original birth certificate, his college and university enrollment records, social security application and passport application records to verify his legitimacy to sign Health Bill HR 3590 or HR 3962 or any other bill under the Natural Citizen requirement of the Article 2, Section 1and seeking a declaratory relief deeming Health Bill HR 3590 and HR 3962 null and void as violating Commerce clause and not signed by a legitimate President of the United States.

4. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief and adjudication  that common law fraud was committed by the Defendant in his declaration of Candidacy to presidency, and based on this fraud Plaintiff suffered damages. Plaintiff is seeking compensation for the damages suffered as well as severe emotional distress suffered due to the fraud committed by the Defendant.

5. Plaintiff is seeking Declaratory relief in that the Defendant has no right to privacy or expectation of privacy in his use of multiple Social Security numbers, numbers issued in other states, where he never resided, as well as numbers never assigned. Plaintiff seeks the writ of Mandamus in disclosure of the application for the social security number 042-68-4425.

6. Wherefore Plaintiff seeks an adjudication in her favor and determination that her civil rights under 42 USC 1983 and 42 USC 1985 were violated and she seeks damages incurred as a result of such violation.

7. Plaintiff is seeking damages under RICO, to be fully plead and ascertained upon completion of discovery.


Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7603



Monday, March 22, 2010


Secretary of State (Foreign Minister) Hillary Clinton has just announced that the USA will "block" Iran's nukes and that sanctions take too long.

Meaning? Bomb Iran? A few nukes dropped on them? Is she waking up or is Obama now bowing to Saudi pressure to stop Iran and allowing her to do what she has been promoting for quite a while?

Sunday, March 21, 2010


Amazing Holes!

These holes are not only amazing, but some are really terrifying! The sheer scale of these holes reminds you of just how tiny we are.
Kimberley Big Hole - South Africa

Apparently the largest ever hand-dug excavation in the world, this 1097 meter deep mine yielded over 3 tons of diamonds before being closed.

Glory Hole - Monticello Dam, California

A glory hole is used when a dam is at full capacity and water needs to be drained from the reservoir. It is the largest spillway of this type in the world. It consumes 14,400 cubic feet of water every second.

Great Blue Hole , Belize

This incredible geographical phenomenon known as a blue hole is situated 60 miles off the mainland of Belize . There are numerous blue holes around the world, but none as stunning as this one.

Sinkhole in Guatemala

These photos are of a sinkhole that occurred in Guatemala . The hole swallowed 2 dozen homes and killed at least 3 people.

SHIT HOLE, Washington D.C.

It is capable of swallowing trillions and trillions of U.S. Dollars-annually! The money that falls into this hole is never heard from again! It is reputed to be filled with at least 535 ass 'holes

Saturday, March 20, 2010


I bought a new Chevy Avalanche

And returned to the dealer yesterday

Because I couldn't get the radio to work.

The salesman explained that the radio was voice activated.

'Nelson,' the salesman said to the radio
The radio replied, 'Ricky or Willie?'
'Willie!' he continued and 'On The Road Again'

Came from the speakers.

Then he said, 'Ray Charles!', and in an instant

' Georgia On My Mind' replaced Willie Nelson.

I drove away happy, and for the next few days,

Every time I'd say, 'Beethoven,'

I'd get beautiful classical music, and if I said,

'Beatles,' I'd get one of their awesome songs.

Yesterday, some guy ran a red light

And nearly creamed my new truck,

But I swerved in time to avoid him.
I yelled, 'Ass Hole!'

Immediately the radio responded with,

"Ladies and gentlemen,

The President of The

United States

Damn I love this truck...Smart too



Rules? This. Is. Congress! [Daniel Foster]

Yes, Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings (Fla.) (impeached former judge) just said this in the most powerful committee of the United States House of Representatives. The people's house:

"There ain't no rules here, we're trying to accomplish something. . . .All this talk about rules. . . .When the deal goes down . . . we make 'em up as we go along

It will appear - UNDENIABLY - on CSPAN video



March 20th, 2010
Zoroastrian Festival



Best wishes to all our visitors
Persian and Otherwise

Mullahs have tried to suppress it being celebrated. Should tell you something.

This basically Zoroastrian religious festival of “renewal” arriving in Spring, has three main tenets in its religion:

Think good thoughts (pendaar-e neek), speak good words (goftaar-e neek) and do good deeds (kerdaar-e neek).

While “worshipping” Light (goodness), this religion has a good force of light and an equal evil force of darkness, which like Yin and Yang follow each other in a constant struggle personified by night and day.


There are various customs which have originated with this, including the last Wednesday of the year (Chaharshanbe Souri) where small bonfires are made of dried bushes similar to our Tumbleweed and Persians traditionally jump over a string of these and chant to the fires:

“May my redness (good health) be derived from you into me and your yellowness (poor health or situation) from me (pulled out of me into your flames)”

The Mullahs have banned this custom as pure superstition (as opposed to the string of these in Islam) but Persians flouted the ban and there were clashes between celebrants and Mullah Suppression forces all across the country. Videos of theser are hard to distinguish as cell phones do not make good video cameras at night.

A couple of better such videos can be seen at:


Then on the 13th day after Nowrouz, Persian families leave home and go into the countryside for mass picnics.

There unmarried girls tie knots in blades of grass to ask for a suitor to come their way.

Prior to NowRuz families also symbolically sprout wheat in dishes and take these out on the picnics and try to find running water into which they throw these.

Some say to get rid of life’s evil this way but as probably to “seed” the banks and distant reaches of the river with wheat that can then spread far and wide and grow into food sources.

Friday, March 19, 2010




Shock to NBC This morning.

An Indianapolis doctor's letter to Sen. Bayh about the Bill (Note: Dr. Stephen E. Fraser, MD practices as an anesthesiologist in Indianapolis, IN ) Here is a letter I sent to Senator Bayh.. Feel free to copy it and send it around to all other representatives. -- Stephen Fraser

Senator Bayh,

As a practicing physician I have major concerns with the health care bill before Congress. I actually have read the bill and am shocked by the brazenness of the government's proposed involvement in the patient-physician relationship. The very idea that the government will dictate and ration patient care is dangerous and certainly not helpful in designing a health care system that works for all. Every physician I work with agrees that we need to fix our health care system, but the proposed bills currently making their way through congress will be a disaster if passed.

I ask you respectfully and as a patriotic American to look at the following troubling lines that I have read in the bill. You cannot possibly believe that these proposals are in the best interests of the country and our fellow citizens.

Page 22 of the HC Bill: Mandates that the Govt will audit books of all employers that self-insure!!

Page 30 Sec 123 of HC bill: THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get.

Page 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill: YOUR HEALTH CARE IS RATIONED!!!

Page 42 of HC Bill: The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC benefits for you. You have no choice!

Page 50 Section 152 in HC bill: HC will be provided to ALL non-US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Page 58 HC Bill: Govt will have real-time access to individuals' finances & a 'National ID Health card' will be issued! (Papers please!)

Page 59 HC Bill lines 21-24: Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for elective funds transfer. (Time for more cash and carry) THEY WILL BE ABLE TO DRAW CASH FRM YOUR ACCOUNTS WHENEVER AND FOR WHATEVER REASONS THEY WANT!

Page 65 Sec 164: Is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in unions & community organizations: (ACORN IS NOW ORDERED TO RECEIVE FUNDING AGAIN AND NOT JUST IN THE HEALTH CARE BILL BUT ACROSS THE BOARD AS  BEFORE).

Page 84 Sec 203 HC bill: Govt mandates ALL benefit packages for private HC plans in the 'Exchange.'

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans -- The Govt will ration your health care!

Page 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill: Govt mandates linguistic appropriate services. (Translation: illegal aliens.)

Page 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18: The Govt will use groups (i.e. ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan.

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans. (AARP members - your health care WILL be rationed!)

Page 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill: Medicaid eligible individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. (No choice.)

Page 124 lines 24-25 HC: No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Govt monopoly.

Page 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill: Doctors/ American Medical Association - The Govt will tell YOU what salary you can make.

Page 145 Line 15-17: An Employer MUST auto-enroll employees into public option plan. (NO choice!)

Page 126 Lines 22-25: Employers MUST pay for HC for part-time employees AND their families. (Employees shouldn't get excited about this as employers will be forced to reduce its work force, benefits, and wages/salaries to cover such a huge expense.)

Page 149 Lines 16-24: ANY Employer with payroll 401k & above who does not provide public option will pay 8% tax on all payroll! (See the last comment in parenthesis.)

Page 150 Lines 9-13: A business with payroll between $251K & $401K who doesn't provide public option will pay 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Page 167 Lines 18-23: ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Page 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill: Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay.) (Like always)

Page 195 HC Bill: Officers & employees of the GOVT HC Admin.. will have access to ALL Americans' finances and personal records. (I guess so they can 'deduct' their fees)

Page 203 Line 14-15 HC: "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax." (Yes, it really says that!) ( a 'fee' instead)

Page 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill: Govt will reduce physician services for Medicaid Seniors. (Low-income and the poor are affected.)

Page 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill: Doctors: It doesn't matter what specialty you have trained yourself in -- you will all be paid the same! (Just TRY to tell me that's not Socialism!)

Page 253 Line 10-18: The Govt sets the value of a doctor's time, profession, judgment, etc. (Literally-- the value of humans.)

Page 265 Sec 1131: The Govt mandates and controls productivity for "private" HC industries.

Page 268 Sec 1141: The federal Govt regulates the rental and purchase of power driven wheelchairs.

Page 272 SEC. 1145: TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 280 Sec 1151: The Govt will penalize hospitals for whatever the Govt deems preventable (

Page 298 Lines 9-11: Doctors: If you treat a patient during initial admission that results in a re-admission -- the Govt will penalize you.

Page 317 L 13-20: PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. (The Govt tells doctors what and how much they can own!)

Page 317-318 lines 21-25, 1-3: PROHIBITION on expansion. (The Govt is mandating that hospitals cannot expand.)

Page 321 2-13: Hospitals have the opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input is required. (Can you say ACORN?)

Page 335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339: The Govt mandates establishment of 2 outcome-based measures. (HC the way they want -- rationing.)

Page 341 Lines 3-9: The Govt has authority to disqualify Medicare Advance Plans, HMOs, etc. (Forcing people into the Govt plan)

Page 354 Sec 1177: The Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of 'special needs people!' Unbelievable!

Page 379 Sec 1191: The Govt creates more bureaucracy via a "Tele-Health Advisory Committee." (Can you say HC by phone?)

Page 425 Lines 4-12: The Govt mandates "Advance-Care Planning Consult." (Think senior citizens end-of-life patients.)

Page 425 Lines 17-19: The Govt will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. (And it's mandatory!)

Page 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3: The Govt provides an "approved" list of end-of-life resources; guiding you in death. (Also called 'assisted suicide.') (Sounds like Soylent Green to me.)

Page 427 Lines 15-24: The Govt mandates a program for orders on "end-of-life." (The Govt has a say in how your life ends!)

Page 429 Lines 1-9: An "advanced-care planning consultant" will be used frequently as a patient's health deteriorates.

Page 429 Lines 10-12: An "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end-of-life plans.. (AN ORDER TO DIE FROM THE GOVERNMENT?!?)

Page 429 Lines 13-25: The GOVT will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.. (I wouldn't want to stand before God after getting paid for THAT job!)

Page 430 Lines 11-15: The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end-of-life! (Again -- no choice!)

Page 469: Community-Based Home Medical Services = Non-Profit Organizations. (Hello? ACORN Medical Services here!?!)

Page 489 Sec 1308: The Govt will cover marriage and family therapy. (Which means Govt will insert itself into your marriage even.)

Page 494-498: Govt will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, and rationing those services.

Senator, I guarantee that I personally will do everything possible to inform patients and my fellow physicians about the dangers of the proposed bills you and your colleagues are debating.

Furthermore, if you vote for a bill that enforces socialized medicine on the country and destroys the doctor-patient relationship, I will do everything in my power to make sure you lose your job in the next election.


Stephen E. Fraser, MD

Thursday, March 18, 2010


We have been receiving Emails, among the 200 to 300 we receive daily in at least two languages, mostly with information, asking if we are well and indicating a concern about the reduction in our daily posts. A factually correct comment.

We still get visitors from over 80 countries in some 30 languages but these have dropped to the low four figures because there have been gaps of several days in what we have posted. And the posts were sparse.

A wave of 'flu began this,  then a loss of sufficient energy  required for the many hours a day needed to operate the site properly.

Then came the centralization of three laptops into a new one, which has a different operating system. Simple enough technologically but very time consuming. Two of the three now completed, allowing a return to the Site needs. More or less. (smile).

Including merging/purging mailing lists of some thousand or more people, we contact occasionally.

While setting up  Dragon (voice to text) software and partlially sorting a four inch thick folder of notes for a non-fiction, political/social novel that is being written by us, a friend asked us to help set up a commercial operation for them (actually two).

Below all this came a welcome slew of assignments in the field of what we do to earn a living, allowing very little time/energy for the needs of the site.

By the way, we are looking for a serious publisher to whom to submit an outline and some sample chapters, so let us know if you have one whom might be interested. Self-publishing is always an option we have as a back up but not our first choice.

We never lack for material, only the time, which now seems to be coming together and we will be reverting to a normal volume of latest informantion and commentary.

Thanks to those who have stayed with us through this period. We should be ramping up the volume over the next week so stay tuned.

Meantime here is a video to keep you going, on the Islamic jihad inside Amercia. There are an estimated OVER 40,000 jihadi SUICIDE/Homicide bombers already in place in the USA waiting to be called into action.


More and an interactive internal terrorist map on

Saturday, March 13, 2010



Congratulations to the people of Iran In memory of one of their own valued sons on the birthday of His Imperial Majesty Reza Shah the Great, who should be remembered for ever.

We express well-deserved gratitude for this courageous, patriotic man whose actions serve as a shining example to future generations, who should learn how through his tireless efforts in the short span of some 16-years, he brought Iran out of the Dark Ages into the modern world.

And succeeded in laying the groundwork for an expanding nation by ensuring security inside Iran as well as international respect and protected the borders of Iran for all of which he will always remain alive in our highest esteem, may he rest in peace.

The birthday of H.I.M. Reza Shah the Great should be proclaimed as a National Day.

فرخنده زاد روز شاهنشاه ایران ساز اعلیحضرت رضا شاه بزرگ را به ملت ایران شاد باش گفته و آرزومندیم ایران این فرزند گرامی خود را همیشه بیاد داشته باشد . قدر دانی از خدمات برجسته این راد مرد وطن پرست موجب میشود که فرزندان آینده ایران درس وطن پرستی را از طریق توجه به زحمات شبانه روزی این شاهنشاه بیاموزند که در زمان بسیار کوتاه شانزده سال ایران را از قرون وسطی به عصر حاضر رسانید و توانست پایه گذاری برای ایرانی مترقی از طریق تأمین امنیت داخلی و اعتبار بین المللی و حفظ مرزهای ایران بنماید.

رضا شاه کبیر همیشه در ذهن ایران زنده است و جایگاهی والا دارد.

روح پر فتوحش شاد باد

زاد روز اعلحضرت رضاه بزرگ را بصورت عید ملی در آوریم