Saturday, May 31, 2008


Some more views


For a few days there was a growing almost feeding frenzy of visits, mostly from Google search queries, that suddenly disappeared as if a water faucet had been turned off.

Out of curiosity, I did a search - just as others had - of "Huma Abedin" - and disovered the main link that drew in so may visitors had disappeared. Antimullah or the no longer figured in the Google search.

There are hundreds of articles on Huma posted all over on the internet, so the ABRUPT absence of this particular one screams volumes.

As you can see, the AntiMullah article date March 2008 is gone but older articles from other sites as there.

Someone behind the scenes at Google had apparently "pulled it" so that instead of being at near the top or at the top of the search as before, you could not find either of the article links. No matter how far you drilled.

While this may seem an end in itself, the multitude of visitors also got to see the seven other Sections of AntiMullah and articles that covered terrorism and
brought attention to subjects disliked by the Mullahs. (In addition to perhaps "outing" or shining the spotlight on probably the highest Al-Qaeda plant in the USA).

Not too long ago, that same "unseen" behind the scene "apparently" pro-Iranian Mullah influence, most likely in the Google tech section, temporarily made posting to AntiMullah very difficult.

It took a few days to have the situation corrected but here again, the unseen person, who might, just might be a Mullah plant inside Google, has struck again.

The Mullahs have their people inside as many Media and Blog administrations as they can and pay excellent money to TV, Radio and Print Media for obstructing dissent to them and for planting false information.

The link below was the one which brought most of the visitors that is now "absent" but the link at the title also brings this up as a link within that post, so just click on th title to get the full details.

Clearly the way to check it is to do a Google search on "Huma Abedin" and see what you get. It will NOT include the one below.

Yet another reason for Google to check their staff and correct the situation.

Thursday, May 29, 2008


Alan note: The analysis is still valid though unless the Asia Times made a date error, the article shows as being posted May30th, 2007, thus about a year ago. Some elements will have changed over the past year, including a big schism in the top ranks of the Mullahs, with Ahmadi-Nejad finding himself increasingly opposed for his mismanagement of the economy, his aggressive attitude toward the West and hard line on nuclear power. All of which could invite an attack on Iran that his opponents like Ali Larijani and "ayatollah" Rafsanjani feel can be delayed indefinitely by "talk". By Spengler What can the West offer the Islamic Republic of Iran in return for giving up its nuclear ambitions and kenneling its puppies of war? The problem calls to mind the question regarding what to give a man who has everything: cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's, diabetes, kidney failure, and so forth. Iran's economy is so damaged that it is impossible to tell how bad things are. Except perhaps for the oilfields of southern Iraq, and perhaps also northern Saudi Arabia, there is nothing the West can give Iran to forestall an internal breakdown. Iranian dissidents put overall unemployment at 30% and youth unemployment at 50%. Government subsidies sustain a very large portion of the population; 42% of the non-agricultural population is employed by the Iranian state, compared with 17% in Pakistan. Within fewer than 10 years, Iran will become a net importer, at which point the government no longer will be able to provide subsidies. Iran's economic implosion is a source of imminent strategic risk. Alan note: Oil wells needing care and servicing are calculated to stop producing enough oil to satisfy the need of internal demand, let alone export it for revenue. While the Mullahs control probably the second largest natural gas reserves, their technology for liquefying this uses outdated methods and sale of the MOST MODERN technology, an USA method, has been denied to them. Also development of the huge gas fields needs many more years. Even with already conracted Chinese help. Plus foreign investment to develop oil and gas reserves , pretty much except by the Chinese has run into difficulties including from UN samctions. What most analysts, including this writer, foresaw as a medium-term problem seems to have confronted Iran much sooner than expected. The present inflation rate of about 20%, driven by a 40% rate of monetary expansion, suggests that government resources are already exhausted. Governments resort to the printing press when they no longer can raise sufficient funds through taxation, sales of state-owned commodities such as oil, or borrowing. That is surprising, considering that Iran reported a current-account surplus of US$13 billion last year. The fact that Iran cannot stabilize its currency suggests a breakdown of political consensus within the regime, and a scramble by different elements in the regime to lay hands on whatever resources it can. Another possibility is that the official numbers are entirely false, and that Iran already has fallen into a current-account deficit. Alan note: specially the way the Mullahs have been subsidizing Hezbollah and other terror groups, helping Syria buy arms from the Russians and paying for North Korean for testing of nuclear and rocket technology. In a May 19 statement reported by the official Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), President Mahmud Ahmadinejad denied a report that Iran's imports now exceed $60 billion, against an official estimate of $45 billion. This sort of discrepancy typically occurs when capital flight is disguised as imports through fraudulent invoices and similar devices. A small current-account deficit would be of little concern for a nation with normal access to world capital markets, but Iran is unable to borrow. That is the background to Ahmadi-Nejad's decree last week reducing private and state bank lending rates to 12% from 14%, that is, 5-10 percentage points below the rate of inflation. If Ahmadi-Nejad were in the pay of a hostile intelligence service, he could not have found a more effective way to sabotage Iran's economy. If the price of goods rises faster than the cost of money, everyone who can will borrow money to purchase and hoard goods. The result will be higher prices and reduced economic activity, and the eventual prospect of hyperinflation, which no government ever has survived. Last week's rate reduction augmented the incentives for capital flight. Ahmadi-Nejad took this foolhardy step against the explicit advice of Iran's economic authorities, which suggests that the economic suffering of his political base commanded his undivided attention. After increasing gasoline prices earlier in the month, (May 2007 is thus correct) he evidently found it necessary to throw his constituents a bone. Iran's prospective demographic implosion, I have argued for two years, pushes Tehran toward imperial expansion. [1] It is difficult to see a way out for Persia's pocket empire; the country exports nothing but oil, carpets, pistachios and dried fruit (excluding the growing human traffic in Persian women), and manufactures nothing the world will buy. Its most pressing problem, unemployment among the 60% of its population now under the age of 30, will turn into a much worse problem as this generation ages. In two decades Iran will have half as many soldiers and twice as many pensioners. If a future catastrophe is inevitable, its impact has a way of leaping back into the present. Monetary disorder of the magnitude we now observe suggests an internal collapse of confidence. What strategic consequences ensue from Iran's economic misery? Broadly speaking, the choices are two. In the most benign scenario, Iran's clerical establishment will emulate the Soviet Union of 1987, when then-prime minister Mikhail Gorbachev acknowledged that communism had led Russia to the brink of ruin in the face of vibrant economic growth among the United States and its allies. Russia no longer had the resources to sustain an arms race with the US, and broke down under the pressure of America's military buildup. The second choice is an imperial adventure. In fact, Iran is engaged in such an adventure, funding and arming Shi'ite allies from Basra to Beirut, and creating clients selectively among such Sunnis as Hamas in Palestine. I continue to predict that Iran will gamble on adventure rather than go the way of Gorbachev. A fundamental difference in sociology distinguishes Iran from the Soviet Union at the cusp of the Cold War. Josef Stalin's terror saw to it that the only communist true believers left alive were lecturing at Western universities. All the communists in Russia were dead or in the gulags. By the 1980s, only the most cowardly, self-seeking, unprincipled careerists had survived to hold positions of seniority in the communist establishment. Only in the security services were a few hard and dedicated men still active, including Vladimir Putin. These were men who saw no reason to fight for communism 70 years after the Russian Revolution. Iran, however, is not 70 years away from its revolution, but fewer than 30 years away. Ahmadi-Nejad typifies the generation of Revolutionary Guards who followed the ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, and now hold senior positions in the state and military. Alan note: though their loyalty - to anyone in particular - is coming ever more into question. Ahmadi-Nejad blames the country's economic problems on "certain elements", presumably his opponents within the regime, alleging that government agencies have falsified statistics to discredit him. As noted, he denied reports that imports were fully a third higher than officially reported, an astonishing statement for a head of government to have to make. The president also claimed that unemployment had declined to 11.3% from 11.5% in 2006, adding, "The government is now striving hard to provide employment opportunities for the country's jobless people." The IRNA report concluded with this less-than-confidence-building comment about inflation: On [the] inflation rate, he said the government is quite successful in controlling [the] spiraling inflation rate while other factors such as the country's development projects and worldwide price hikes should be taken into consideration. "Unfortunately, certain elements are now issuing fabricated statistics and try to tarnish reality, but we strive to remove all existing weaknesses," said the president. "Certain elements" no doubt refers to Ayatollah Akbar Rafsanjani, his opponent in the 2006 presidential election and leader of the faction more inclined to compromise with the West. Alan note: Former lowly pistachio orchard owner, now multi-billionaire Rafsanjani, perhaps one of the richest men in the world has a multitude of large projects around the globe, huge desposits in off-shore banks and owns extensive property in various countries. His view of the world and its economy varies totally with Ahmadi-Nejad's "sleep and eat on the floor and little money in the bank" life style. Though he does funnel illegal money toward his relatives. Rafsanjani continues to maintain excellent contacts in Germany, and European diplomats have placed their hopes on the prospect of his replacing Ahmadi-Nejad. It would not be out of character for Rafsanjani and his allies to make matters more irksome for Ahmadi-Nejad by diverting large amounts of money out of state revenues into their own pockets. As a way of changing the Tehran regime, however, pushing Iran toward hyperinflation would be akin to cutting the brake lines of a car to spite its driver, when one is a passenger in the same car. It is easy to hasten the deterioration of Iran's economy, for it is headed downhill in any event, but very difficult to reverse the process. An old piece of diplomatic wisdom states that one always should give one's enemy a way out. But I see no way out for the pocket empire of Persia. Ahmadi-Nejad and his generation of Revolutionary Guards will fight, and cautious old men like Rafsanjani will not be able to stop them. Alan update: the conflicted Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) may no longer fight as well and coherently as they might have a year ago when the above was written. And resent the Bassiji Suppression Forces commander being put in charge over their own commander. They and their families have recently had to deal with the ruthless Bassijis, who have total law enforcement powers - even to arrest an IRGC member or his relatives. A new angle for the IRGC to handle. Made worse by the lowering influence of their "man" Ahmadi-Nejad, a former IRGC commander himslef.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008


This video is in Persian but ludicrous enough to be amusing without language. Also has inserts of real Mullah administrators.

Monday, May 26, 2008



Oh! I forgot to mention the tens of thousands of EXECUTIONS and the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of dead and crippled in the Iran/Iraq war courtesy of Carter's original actions and suport of Khomeini.

The Mullahs are using a more than willing Jimmuh Carter to promote appeasement and trade talks with them as per Barack Hussein OBAMA's declared intentions and give Obama cover from a former U.S. President to proceed as he pretends will bring results.

What is the description of moronic lunacy? To repeat the same thing over and over and expect a different result.

Hard to tell who is the moron and who is the lunatic when we listen to Carter and Obama talk about Mullah Land, Islamic Iran and how to unconditionally appease it, while its agens kill our soldiers and civilians.

Former US President Jimmy Carter urged Washington to establish friendly ties with Tehran, reiterating the need for his country to resume trade relations with Iran, which he described as a "rational" nation.

Speaking at the Hay Festival yesterday, Carter also suggested the US should provide nuclear power technology and fuel to Iran as a show of goodwill.

"What happens if, in three years' time, Iran has a nuclear weapon," Carter asked. "I'm not sure that is going to happen, but if it does, what do we do? They are rational people like all of us in this room. Do they want to commit suicide? I would guess not. So what we have to do is talk with them now and say to them we want to be their friends," the former US president said.

"The United States must let Iran know that we want to give them fuel and everything they need for a non-military nuclear program. Twenty-five years ago we cut off trading with Iran. We've got to resume trading to show Iran we are friends."

Carter also criticized President George Bush, saying it was a "serious mistake and terrible departure" from the actions of previous US presidents not to engage with countries with which they differed.

"The president of the administration in Washington is the first one to have ever done this and I think we close off ourselves from any sort of rational accommodation of the views of other parties in order to reach out on major goals," said Carter, in a further interview with Sky Arts, to be broadcast today.


Selected COMMENTS from FReepers:

America's worst president ever calls for providing nuclear fuel and technology to Iran....after all, it worked out so well when he gave them to North Korea.

That moron is the guy that paved the way the Iranian Islamic revolution by dissing the Shah.

Hmmmm maybe MORON is the wrong term... Imbecile?.... no MORON is better.

Is this real??? I honestly thought it was Scrappleface. I didn’t think even Carter was THAT stupid.

Just wow. The idiocy of that man knows no bounds. They are not a whit different from the Iran that caused him to sit in the Oval Office wringing his hands because it made him and everyone else see just how impotent and incompetent he was as a leader.

Then he sent good men to their deaths in a risky mission that we should have never had to try to begin with.

He was responsible in large part for the fall of the Shah.

They are rational people like all of us in this room.

Sometimes the peanut farmer gets it right! Anybody who didn't get up and walk out after these comments probably is about as rational as the leadership of Iran. We know Carter fits the bill.

Carter also criticized President George Bush, saying it was a "serious mistake and terrible departure" from the actions of previous US presidents not to engage with countries with which they differed.

Jimmy, how many Democrat Presidents met with Fidel Castro?

“Former US President Jimmy Carter urged Washington to establish friendly ties with Tehran”

Good idea! The U.S. State Department has a job for him. Running the U.S. embassy in Tehran.

We had very fine relations with Iran, before Jimmah destroyed them by causing the ouster of our friend the Shah. He certainly was not willing to talk to him.

Now he wants to talk with the current leader. Some people just don't know how to behave.

I believe that President Carter is indeed senile, and that perhaps even dementia has set in since it appears that he has utterly forgotten the humiliation that Iran visited on his administration when the Iranians ransacked our embassy and kidnapped our embassy staff.

Coupled with other bizarre behavior on his part I believe, for the memory of his own dignity and the dignity of his former office as President of the United States, that Mr. Carter's public comments should now be studiously ignored by the press.

They(Mullahs) are rational people like all of us in this room.

What a dumbass.

The judicial sentence for one of their criminals last year was to throw him off a cliff. They’re still savage in their hearts.

Carter is the one who sold out the Shah and gave Iran to the Mullahs. They rewarded him by taking our embassy employees hostage until he left office. This guy is a nut case.

They are rational people like all of us in this room. Do they want to commit suicide? I would guess not. So what we have to do is talk with them now and say to them we want to be their friends.


Jimmuh has peanuts for brains!

No. 1, Jimmuh you're not a rational guy......... if you were you'd know that the Iranian government lacks rationality.

No 2., Becoming friends with people that are killing our troops, funding terrorism throughout the world, building nuclear bombs, and threatening to wipe us and Israel off the map is not very smart or rational. It's suicidal!!!!

With friends like Iran who needs enemies?!?

Do they want to commit suicide? The hidden Imam commands they commit suicide in order to hasten his return. Anybody who listens to Ammanutjob would realize he is serious.

I just can’t get over the GALL of this man. For such a failed president to be going about, bleating about what HE thinks we should do makes me want to scream. Can’t his handlers CONTROL him? Is he completely unaware of what the majority of Americans THINK of him?

Actually, he is a vain and bitter man. He absolutely cannot stand that he is thought of as such a bad president. He also is extremely jealous of how Nixon rehabilitated himself after leaving office. He cannot stand it period. He is so vain that when gets on an airliner he ‘personally’ walks up and down the aisle ‘shaking’ everyone’s hand. I know, because I had the misfortune to have him offer his hand to me on a Delta Flight to DC. He was an extremely bad governor, and he was worse as a president. He has however, been a particularly effective traitor.

“Iran, which he (Carter) described as a “rational” nation.”

Is Iran more or less rationale than when Jimmy Carter took office?

At that time, Iran was run by the Shah of Iran, an American ally. American allies were seldom good enough for Carter. He undermined the Shah, who was replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini. Khomeini was anti-American and anti-Western - just the kind of dictator beloved by the American left.

Khomeini radicalized Islam, returning it to its Muslim supremacist roots. Almost all subsequent Islamic terrorism traces its roots to Khomeini’s influence, and one step removed, Carter’s influence. Carter is in no position to lecture anyone about Iran.

"The president of the administration in Washington..."

'scuse me? Would that be the Pres of the United States you are speaking of, you anti-Semitic nincompoop?

They are rational people like all of us in this room.

You mean the same rational people that said this?

"As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," said Ahmadinejad, referring to Iran's revolutionary leader Ayatollah Allah Khomeini.

Who condemns all Muslim leaders who accept the existence of Israel as "acknowledging a surrender and defeat of the Islamic world."

Who states that Israel must be "wiped off the map"

Who tells the world that Israel is "on the verge of disappearing"

Who calls Israel a "fictitious" and "illegitimate" regime

Who tells the world to accept Israel's "imminent collapse".

Who's president says that "the US and Israel will soon die"?

You mean those rational people, you anti-Semite? What a despicable and hateful little man you are.

Carter's ego simply will not allow him to admit the devastation his appeasement of the Iranian Islamic terrorists thirty years ago is still causing America so he keeps showing up, spouting the same treasonous garbage, refusing to salvage any little bit of manhood and class he could by disappearing and letting us forget his pathetic existence.

He's not senile, he's an dirty old leftist who, like all the rest of them, wants to see America knocked down and reshaped into a communist hellhole where the masses are firmly in their place and the unblemished, sparkling pure anointed like Jimmy Carter are in charge.


Speaking at the Hay Festival yesterday, Carter also suggested the US should provide nuclear power technology and fuel to Iran as a show of goodwill.

You really shouldn't miss this's pure Twilight Zone.


I have searched high and low in my files to find the photos of housewives at city dumps in Iran, I had saved. These depicted women and children meeting garbage dump trucks and trying to salvage food and anything they could sell to pay for the staggering cost of life in Iran. Staggering compared to incomes.

At the time, the focus was government industrial workers not being paid for as long as nine months to a year and going hungry.

The man in the photo below searches for scraps of bread and other food to sustain himself and his family. He's not homeless, he's indigent because food prices have spiraled out of control inside Islamic Iran - despite HUGE windfall profits from oil rice increases pouring into the Mullah Treasury.

The video below, Farsi with English subtitles, uses tomatoes as an example of the impossible level of food prices - except in the neighborhood of President Ahmadi-Nejad, the stinky Turd.

To put perspective to the pricing shown in the video (often shown in dollar equivalents) a monthly $100 salary is a wonderful one and a well paid Mullah judge receives about $300 a month. In general, the average income inside Iran for the average worker (when they do get paid) is LESS than ONE Dollar a day.

So to buy tomatoes at the prices shown in the video, or the eggs or potatoes the woman complains about is more than a day's pay! And MUCH higher than the prices we pay in the USA, (though this may be changing in the near future) and where our payscales are WAY higher - even for so called poverty level Americans, who would live like millionaires.

The average Iranian in Mullah Land - calling it Iran is a misnomer with clerical Taazi Arabs in charge - has taken to working at two or three jobs, closing his eyes to his wife and daughters prostituting themselves as they cannot find any legitimate employment in the Islamic men-only world AND if in any kind of position to ask for a bribe for perfoming their duties to insist on this "user-tax" to try to pay for their basic living expenses rather than to gather riches.

The bribe scenario changes at high level positions where contracts and business or import licenses require a Mullah or high level official's approval. But provide big profits.

What puzzles me with Obama, the Democrats and Liberals insisting that dialogue with Mullah Land MIGHT be useful is why they believe a Regime which cares so little about their own people would care about anything we could offer them. Short of total capitulation and implementation of Islamic sharia law inside the USA.

But as the article being posted above shows, they are going full out to support Obama.

Sunday, May 25, 2008


Also watch these FIVE videos of sermons by Islamic preachers in England

Saturday, May 24, 2008


Jim Horn views this problem CLICK HERE


Krauthammer responds: "Obama cited Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman as presidents who met with enemies. Does he know no history?

Neither Roosevelt nor Truman ever met with any leaders of the Axis powers.

Obama cites John Kennedy meeting Nikita Khruschev as another example of what he wants to emulate. Really?

The Vienna summit of a young, inexperienced, untested American president was disastrous, emboldening Khruschev to push Kennedy on Berlin -- and then nearly fatally in Cuba, leading directly to the Cuban missile crisis.

Is that the precedent Obama aspires to follow?

A meeting with Ahmadinejad would not just strengthen and vindicate him at home, it would instantly and powerfully ease the mullah's isolation, inviting other world leaders to follow.

What concessions does Obama imagine Ahmadinejad will make to him on Iran's nuclear program?

And what new concessions will Obama offer? To abandon Lebanon? To recognize Hamas? Or perhaps to squeeze Israel?

Obama keeps trying to explain.

In Oregon he declared that by Soviet standards Iran and others "don't pose a serious threat to us." On the contrary, Islamic Iran is dangerously apocalyptic. Soviet Russia was not.

The next day in Montana he said, "I've made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave." THE VERY NEXT DAY, mind you."

We may be entering a new phase in the history of the American presidency: Remedial on-the-job learning.

Friday, May 23, 2008


In keeping with the new Obama CHANGE and his "obey" Poster I am posting the FARSI version of the COMMENT made by Evil-Islam to "Iran Claims CIA bust....." article below. English translation obediently and respectfully follows at the end!

Scroll down if your Farsi comprehension has not yet been forced to catch up to your English skills.

نشان از دو کس دارد آن نیک پی

اوباما ایرانی است!!!
نتیجه تحقیقات دانشگاه ام آی تی آمریکا
کد خبر: 4044

ایتارتاس در این خصوص گزارش داد: تحقیقات تازه یک تیم تحقیقات تاریخی ! بر روی اصل و نسب باراک اوباما نشان داده است که او یک ایرانی الاصل است.

دکتر اندی واسهول از موسسه تحقیقات تاریخی دانشگاه ام آی تی آمریکا میگوید: مطابق تحقیقات تیم وی، باراک اوباما اصولأ از اهالی جنوب ایران و شیعه است.

به گفته وی، خاندان اوباما در حقیقت همان خاندان معروف اوبامای بوشهر هستند که در دوران قاجاریه جلای وطن کرده و طی چند نسل به آمریکا رسیده اند جد بزرگ اوباما، میرحسن خان اوبامائی از میرآب های معروف بوشهر بوده و به همین خاطر اوباما یعنی "آب با ما" می باشد. او پس از یک نزاع خونین با سقا باشی ناصرالدین شاه قاجار از بوشهر فرار کرده به سرحدات عثمانی میرود. وی ابتدا در حلبچه به عنوان تاجر زردچوبه فعالبت میکند و پس از ارتقاء در تجارتش به عنوان تاجر زعفران به شهر حلب (در سوریه کنونی) می رود. مقارن با ایام مشروطه میرحسن خان در حلب فوت نموده و پسر وی علی اصغر اوباما، به خاطر ضدیت اهالی عثمانی با شیعیان ایرانی خانواده را به سمت طرابلس می کوچاند.

خاندان اوباما در آنجا به تجارت تنباکو مشغول می شوند اما پس از ممنوعیت استعمال قلیان در آن جا، دسته دسته شده و به جاهای دیگر مهاجرت میکنند. در این ایام که اندکی قبل از جنگ جهانی دوم بوده پدر بزرگ حسین به همراه خانواده اش جنوب غربی آفریقا مهاجرت میکنند. وی در آنجا برای امرار معاش به تهیه و فروش برک که نوعی پارچه از پشم شتر است می پردازد وهمان نام ایرانی برک را برای آن استفاده میکند. پس از جنگ جهانی برک بشدت مورد توجه قرار میگیرد و به همین خاطر از طرف معاون شهردار واشینگتن دی سی به آمریکا و لوس آنجلس دعوت میشود.

وی پس از ورد به خاک آمریکا به همراه خانواده اش در تگزاس رحل اقامت می افکند و به تولید و تجارت برک (در گویش آمریکائی باراک) می پردازد اما پس از چندی به خاطر ممنوعیت واردات شتر و پشم آن به آمریکا ورشکست شده و به ناچار فرزندانش را به مدرسه می فرستد.
پدر باراک یعنی حسن اوباما پس از طی دوران مدرسه و دانشگاه تابعیت ایرانی – آمریکائی بدست آورده با یک دختر مسیحی ازدواج کرده و سپس به اصرار خانواده به ناچار مذهب اسلامی – مسیحی اختیار میکند اما از انتخاب اسم اسلامی یا ایرانی برای فرزندخود منع میشود. به همین خاطر با انتخاب نام "باراک" که در حقیقت همانن لفظ فارسی برک است و انتقال نام میانی و نام خانوادگی "حسین اوباما " برای پسرش به هویت خود روی فرزندش ادامه میدهد.

بنا به گزارش، افشای این امر می تواند در سر بزرگی برای آینده سیاسی اوباما در آمریکا و ایران باشد.

همچنین به گزارش خبرنگار، دکتر انوشیروان کیهانی زاده ضمن قابل قبول دانستن این فرضیه گفت: اینجانب همیشه به ایرانی بودن اوباما مشکوک بوده ام
تا کنون اوباما از درک و اظهار نظر مدعیات این تاریخ نگاران معذور بوده است.

The result of M I T research about the origin of Obama.

News Code 4044

New research by a historical researcher about Obama’s origin shows that he is of Iranian origin.

Dr. Andy Vashol, from the research institute of MIT university says according to his research team Obama is Muslim from south of Iran .

As he says, Obama’s family are the same family who were living in Bushehr during the Qajars’ dynasty time,

Then they were forced to leave Iran and in few generations they came to U.S.A.

His forefather, Mir Hassan khan Obamaee was one of the famous Mirabs in Bushehr (Mirab is a person in charge of water) so his name means ( water is with us).

While a majority of people in Iran say "aab" for water, in some provincial parts of Iran like Bushehr they say "O" instead of aab".

His forefather had a big fallin out with Nasseredin Shah of Qufar’s Saghabashi (the person in charge of Shah’s drinks, so he escaped from Iran to some parts of Ottoman borders.

He first stayed in Halabche as a turmeric merchant and then he upgraded his job to saffron merchant and moved to Halab city in Syria.

By the time of Mashrooteh (Constitutional) Revolution in Iran Mir Hassan khan passed away in Halab and due to the antagonizm of the Ottomans with Iranian citizens, his son Ali Asghar Obama also moved to Trables.

Obama Family started a tobacco trading over there, but after the tobacco was forbidden they departed and migrated to other places.

Shortly before the 2nd world war, his grand father with his family left to the south west of Africa. There he began making a kind of fabric from camel’s wool that Iranians call Barak and after the war these fabrics could attract Americans so much that Washington’s Mayor’s adviser invited him to L.A.

After coming to U.S he stayed in Texas with his family and started the barak business (production and threading), but after awhile the import of camel and it’s wool was totally forbidden so his business stopped and he was forced to send his children to school.

Hossein Obama , Barak’s father finished his education and mnaged to earn an Iranian-American citizenship. He married a Christian girl and adopted a kind of Islamic-Christian religion.

He was not permitted to choose an Iranian name for his son so he picked Barak which is the Persian name of that fabric and added his own name Hossin Obama for his son so that he could be the member of the same family.

According to this report, revelation of this secret could be a big problem for the future of Obama in U.S and Iran.

Also, Dr. Anoshirvan Kayhany Zadeh, whilst he believe this report is acceptable said: because it is a truth that all important people of the world have an Iranian origin, as their roots, I thought that he must be Iranian.

Up to now Barak Obama has not said anything about the report of this historian.


One of the questions repeatedly impinging on the psyche of AntiMullah was why Hillary Clinton was increasingly so happy, more than just cheerful, at ever more solidly losing the race to Obama at each step and at each defection of a super delegaTe. Having previously posted the Clintonian body count shown below, the obvious answer appeared to be she had found a way to get a willing assassin past the Secret Service guarding Obama and all she had to do was wait to catch the candidacy mantle falling from his dead shoulders and wrap herself in it. While believing he Secret Service was capable of preventing assassination from the outside, how would they be able to block something organized from inside by Hillary's terrorist connections, including Girl Friday Huma Abedin's deep family roots and background into Al Qaeda. Preposterous? NEVER FORGET THE CLINTON BODY COUNT when she suddenly slips up and slips in the Kennedy assassination when explaining why she refused to withdraw from the Democratic nomination race. By: Ether Zone Staff Here is the latest body count that we have. All of these people have been connected with the Clintons in some form or another. We have not included any deaths that could not be verified or connected to the Clinton scandals. All deaths are listed chronologically by date. This list is current and accurate to the best of our knowledge as of January 13, 1999 August 1, 2000. Susan Coleman: Rumors were circulating in Arkansas of an affair with Bill Clinton. She was found dead with a gunshot wound to the head at 7 1/2 months pregnant. Death was an apparent suicide. Larry Guerrin: Was killed in February 1987 while investigating the INSLAW case. Kevin Ives & Don Henry: Initial cause of death was reported to be the result of falling asleep on a railroad track in Arkansas on August 23, 1987. This ruling was reported by the State medical examiner Fahmy Malak. Later it was determined that Kevin died from a crushed skull prior to being placed on the tracks. Don had been stabbed in the back. Rumors indicate that they might have stumbled upon a Mena drug operation. Keith Coney: Keith had information on the Ives/Henry deaths. Died in a motorcycle accident in July 1988 with unconfirmed reports of a high speed car chase. Keith McKaskle: McKaskle has information on the Ives/Henry deaths. He was stabbed to death in November 1988. Gregory Collins: Greg had information on the Ives/Henry deaths. He died from a gunshot wound to the face in January 1989. Jeff Rhodes: He had information on the deaths of Ives, Henry & McKaskle. His burned body was found in a trash dump in April 1989. He died of a gunshot wound to the head and there was some body mutilation, leading to the probably speculation that he was tortured prior to being killed. James Milam: Milam had information on the Ives & Henry deaths. He was decapitated. The state Medical examiner, Fahmy Malak, initially ruled death due to natural causes. Richard Winters: Winters was a suspect in the deaths of Ives & Henry. He was killed in a “robbery” in July 1989 which was subsequently proven to be a setup. Jordan Kettleson: Kettleson had information on the Ives & Henry deaths. He was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup in June 1990. Alan Standorf: An employee of the National Security Agency in electronic intelligence. Standorf was a source of information for Danny Casalaro who was investigating INSLAW, BCCI, etc. Standorf’s body was found in the backseat of a car at Washington National Airport on Jan 31, 1991. Dennis Eisman: An attorney with information on INSLAW. Eisman was found shot to death on April 5, 1991. Danny Casalaro: Danny was a free-lance reporter and writer who was investigating the “October Surprise”, INSLAW and BCCI. Danny was found dead in a bathtub in a Sheraton Hotel room in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Danny was staying at the hotel while keeping appointments in the DC area pertinent to his investigation. He was found with his wrists slashed. At least one, and possibly both of his wrists were cut 10 times. All of his research materials were missing and have never been recovered. Victor Raiser: The National Finance Co-Chair for “Clinton for President.” He died in a airplane crash on July 30, 1992. R. Montgomery Raiser: Also involved in the Clinton presidential campaign. He died in the same plane crash as Victor. Paul Tully: Tulley was on the Democratic National Committee. He was found dead of unknown causes in his hotel room on September 24, 1992. No autopsy was ever allowed. Ian Spiro: Spiro had supporting documentation for grand jury proceedings on the INSLAW case. His wife and 3 children were found murdered on November 1, 1992 in their home. They all died of gunshot wounds to the head. Ian’s body was found several days later in a parked car in the Borego Desert. Cause of death? The ingestion of cyanide. FBI report indicated that Ian had murdered his family and then committed suicide. Paula Gober: A Clinton speech writer. She died in a car accident on December 9, 1992 with no known witnesses. Jim Wilhite: Wilhite was an associate of Mack McClarty’s former firm. Wilhite died in a skiing accident on December 21, 1992. He also had extensive ties to Clinton with whom he visited by telephone just hours before his death. Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Todd McKeahan & Conway LeBleu: Died Feburary 28, 1993 by gunfire at Waco. All four were examined by a pathologist and died from identical wounds to the left temple. All four had been body guards for Bill Clinton, three while campaigning for President and when he was Governor of Arkansas.They also were the ONLY 4 BATF agents killed at Waco. Sgt. Brian Haney, Sgt. Tim Sabel, Maj. William Barkley, Capt. Scott Reynolds: Died: May 19, 1993 - All four men died when their helicopter crashed in the woods near Quantico, Va. - Reporters were barred from the site, and the head of the fire department responding to the crash described it by saying, “Security was tight,” with “lots of Marines with guns.” A videotape made by a firefighter was seized by the Marines. All four men had escorted Clinton on his flight to the carrier Roosevelt shortly before their deaths. John Crawford: An attorney with information on INSLAW. He died from a heart attack in Tacoma in April of 1993. John Wilson: Found dead from an apparent hanging suicide on May 18, 1993. He was a former Washington DC council member and claimed to have info on Whitewater. Paul Wilcher: A lawyer who was investigating drug running out of Mena, Arkansas and who also sought to expose the “October Surprise”, BCCI and INSLAW. He was found in his Washington DC apartment dead of unknown causes on June 22, 1993. Vincent Foster: A White House deputy counsel and long-time personal friend of Bill and Hillary’s. Found on July 20, 1993, dead of a gunshot wound to the mouth — a death ruled suicide. Many different theories on this case! Readers are encouraged to read our report in Strange Deaths. Jon Parnell Walker: An investigator for the RTC who was looking into the linkage between the Whitewater and Madison S&L bankruptcy. Walker “fell” from the top of the Lincoln Towers Building. Stanley Heard & Steven Dickson: They were members of the Clinton health care advisory committee. They died in a plane crash on September 10, 1993. Jerry Luther Parks: Parks was the Chief of Security for Clinton’s national campaign headquarters in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car on September 26, 1993 near the intersection of Chenal Parkway and Highway 10 west of Little Rock. Parks was shot through the rear window of his car. The assailant then pulled around to the driver’s side of Park’s car and shot him three more times with a 9mm pistol. His family reported that shortly before his death, they were being followed by unknown persons, and their home had been broken into (despite a top quality alarm system). Parks had been compiling a dossier on Clinton’s illicit activities. The dossier was stolen. Ed Willey: A Clinton fundraiser. He died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound on November 30, 1993. His death came the same day his wife, Kathleen, was sexually assaulted in the White House by Bill Clinton. Gandy Baugh: Baugh was Lasater’s attorney and committed suicide on January 8, 1994. Baugh’s partner committed suicide exactly one month later on February 8, 1994. Herschell Friday: A member of the presidential campaign finance committee. He died in an airplane explosion on March 1, 1994. Ronald Rogers: Rogers died on March 3, 1994 just prior to releasing sensitive information to a London newspaper. Cause of death? Undetermined. Kathy Furguson: A 38 year old hospital worker whose ex-husband is a co- defendant in the Paula Jones sexual harassment law suit. She had information supporting Paula Jone’s allegations. She died of an apparent suicide on May 11, 1994 from a gunshot wound to the head. Bill Shelton: Shelton was an Arkansas police officer and was found dead as an apparent suicide on kathy Ferguson’s grave (Kathy was his girl friend), on June 12, 1994. This “suicide” was the result of a gunshot wound to the back of the head. Stanley Huggins: Huggins, 46, was a principal in a Memphis law firm which headed a 1987 investigation into the loan practices of Madison Guaranty S&L. Stanley died in Delaware in July 1994 — reported cause of death was viral pneumonia. Paul Olson: A Federal witness in investigations to drug money corruption in Chicago politics, Paul had just finished 2 days of FBI interviews when his plane ride home crashed, killing Paul and 130 others on Sept 8 1994. The Sept. 15, 1994 Tempe Tribune newspaper reported that the FBI suspected that a bomb had brought down the airplane. Calvin Walraven: 24 year on Walraven was a key witness against Jocelyn Elder’s son’s drug case. Walraven was found dead in his apartment with a gunshot wound to the head. Tim Hover, a Little Rock police spokesman says no foul play is suspected. Alan G. Whicher: Oversaw Clinton’s Secret Service detail. In October 1994 Whicher was transferred to the Secret Service field office in the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. Whatever warning was given to the BATF agents in that building did not reach Alan Whicher, who died in the bomb blast of April 19th 1995. Duane Garrett: Died July 26, 1995-A lawyer and a talk show host for KGO-AM in San Fransisco, Duane was the campaign finance chairman for Diane Fienstien’s run for the senate, and was a friend and fundraiser for Al Gore. Garrett was under investigation for defrauding investors in Garrett’s failed sports memorabilia venture. There was talk of a deal to evade prosecution. On July 26th, Garrett canceled an afternoon meeting with his lawyer because he had to meet some people at the San Fransisco airport. Three hours later he was found floating in the bay under the Golden Gate Bridge. Ron Brown:. The Commerce Secretary died on April 3, 1996, in an Air Force jet carrying Brown and 34 others, including 14 business executives on a trade mission to Croatia, crashed into a mountainside. The Air Force, in a 22-volume report issued in June of 1996, confirmed its initial judgment that the crash resulted from pilot errors and faulty navigation equipment. At the time of Brown’s death, Independent Counsel Daniel Pearson was seeking to determine whether Brown had engaged in several sham financial transactions with longtime business partner Nolanda Hill shortly before he became secretary of commerce. Charles Meissner: died: UNK - Following Ron Brown’s death, John Huang was placed on a Commerce Department contract that allowed him to retain his security clearanceby Charles Meissner. Shortly thereafter, Meissner died in the crash of a small plane. He was an Assistant Secretary of Commerce for International Economic Policy. William Colby: Retired CIA director was found dead on May 6,1996 after his wife reported him missing on April 27,1996. Apparently, Colby decided to go on a impromptu canoeing excursion and never returned. Colby who had just started writing for Strategic Investment newsletter, worried many in the intelligent community. Colby’s past history of divulging CIA secrets in the past were well known. Strategic Investor had covered the Vince Foster suicide and had hired handwriting experts to review Foster’s suicide note. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: Died on May 16,1996 after he went home for lunch and decided to shoot himself in the chest (by one report, twice) rather than be interviewed by Newsweek magazine that afternoon. Explanations for Boorda’s suicide focused on a claim that he was embarrassed over two “Valor” pins he was not authorized to wear. Lance Herndon: Herndon a 41 year old computer specialist and a prominent entrepreneur who received a presidential appointment in 1995 died August 10, 1996 under suspicious circumstances. He appeared to have died from a blow to the head. Police said no weapons were found at his mansion, adding that Mr. Herndon had not been shot or stabbed and there was no evidence of forced entry or theft. Neil Moody: Died -August 25, 1996 Following Vincent Foster’s murder, Lisa Foster married James Moody, a judge in Arkansas, on Jan 1, 1996. Near the time Susan McDougal first went to jail for contempt, Judge Moor’s son, Neil died in a car crash. There were other reports that Neil Moody had discovered something very unsettling among his stepmother’s private papers and was threatening to go public with it just prior to the beginning of the Democratic National Convention. He was alleged to have been talking to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post about a blockbuster story. Witnesses said they saw Neil Moody sitting in his car arguing with another person just prior to His car suddenly speeding off out of control and hitting a brick wall. Barbara Wise: Wise a 14-year Commerce Department employee found dead and partially naked in her office following a long weekend. She worked in the same section as John Huang. Officially, she is said to have died of natural causes. Doug Adams: Died January 7, 1997- A lawyer in Arkansas who got involved trying to help the people who were being swindled out of their life savings. Adams was found in his vehicle with a gunshot wound to his head in a Springfield Mo. hospital parking lot. Mary C. Mahoney: 25, murdered at the Georgetown Starbuck’s coffee bar over the 4th of July ‘97 weekend. She was a former White House intern who worked with John Huang. Apparently she knew Monica Lewinsky and her sexual encounters with Bill Clinton. Although not verified, it has been said that Lewinsky told Linda Tripp that she did not want to end up like Mahoney. Ronald Miller: Suddenly took ill on October 3rd,1997 and steadily worsened until his death 9 days later. (This pattern fits Ricin poisoning.) Owing to the strangeness of the illness, doctors at the Integris Baptist Medical Center referred the matter to the Oklahoma State Medical Examiner’s Office. The Oklahoma State Medical Examiner’s Office promptly ran tests on samples of Ron Miller’s blood, but has refused to release the results or even to confirm that the tests were ever completed. Had been investigated by authorities over the sale of his company, Gage Corp. to Dynamic Energy Resources, Inc. was the man who tape recorded Gene and Nora Lum and turned those tapes (and other records) over to congressional oversight investigators. The Lums were sentenced to prison for campaign finance violations, using “straw donors” to conceal the size of their contributions to various candidates. Indeed, Dynamic Energy Resources, Inc. had hired Ron Brown’s son Michael solely for the purpose of funneling $60,000 through him to the Commerce Secretary, according to Nolanda Hill’s testimony. Sandy Hume: On Sunday, February 22nd, 1998, Sandy Hume, the 28 year old son of journalist Britt Hume, was reportedly found dead in his Arlington, Virginia home. Aside from the statement that this was an “apparent” suicide, there remains in place a total media blackout on this story, possibly out of concern that the actual facts will not withstand public scrutiny. Worked for Hill magazine, about Congress for Congress. Jim McDougal: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend, banker, and political ally, sent to prison for eighteen felony convictions. A key whitewater witness, dies of a heart attack on March, 8 1998. As of this writing allegations that he was given an injection of the diuretic lasix has not been denied or confirmed.Died on March 8, 1998 Johnny Lawhon: 29, died March 29, 1998- The Arkansas transmission specialist who discovered a pile of Whitewater documents in the trunk of an abandoned car on his property and turned them over to Starr, was killed in a car wreck two weeks after the McDougal death.. Details of the “accident” have been sketchy — even from the local Little Rock newspaper. Charles Wilbourne Miller: 63, was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head on November 17, 1998 in a shallow pit about 300 yards from his ranch house near Little Rock. Police found a .410 gauge shotgun near Miller’s body and a Ruger .357-caliber revolver submerged in water. Investigators concluded the Ruger was the weapon used by Miller to kill himself. Yet, two rounds in the handgun’s cylinder had been spent. He had long served as executive vice president and member of the board of directors for a company called Alltel and was deeply involved in his own software engineering company until the day he died. Alltel is the successor to Jackson Stephens’ Systematics, the company that provided the software for the White House’s “Big Brother” data base system and that was behind the administration’s plan to develop the secret computer “Clipper” chip to bug every phone, fax and email transmission in America. Carlos Ghigliotti: 42, was found dead in his home just outside of Washington D.C. on April 28, 2000. There was no sign of a break-in or struggle at the firm of Infrared Technology where the badly decomposed body of Ghigliotti was found. Ghigliotti had not been seen for several weeks. Ghigliotti, a thermal imaging analyst hired by the House Government Reform Committee to review tape of the siege, said he determined the FBI fired shots on April 19, 1993. The FBI has explained the light bursts on infrared footage as reflections of sun rays on shards of glass or other debris that littered the scene. “I conclude this based on the groundview videotapes taken from several different angles simultaneously and based on the overhead thermal tape,” Ghigliotti told The Washington Post last October. “The gunfire from the ground is there, without a doubt.” Ghigliotti said the tapes also confirm the Davidians fired repeatedly at FBI agents during the assault, which ended when flames raced through the compound. About 80 Branch Davidians perished that day, some from the fire, others from gunshot wounds. Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the congressional committee chaired by Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., said that police found the business card of a committee investigator in Ghigliotti’s office. Corallo said Ghigliotti’s work for the committee ended some time ago. Tony Moser: 41, was killed as he crossed a street in Pine Bluff, Ark on on June 10, 2000. Killed 10 days after being named a columnist for the Democrat-Gazette newspaper and two days after penning a stinging indictment of political corruption in Little Rock. Police have concluded that no charges will be filed against the unnamed driver of a 1995 Chevrolet pickup, which hit Moser as he was walking alone in the middle of unlit Rhinehart Road about 10:10 p.m Police say they have ruled out foul play and will file no charges against the driver because he was not intoxicated and there was no sign of excessive speed.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008


CLAIM: Iran busts CIA terror network Pro-Mullah NEWSPAPER - Tehran Times Political Desk TEHRAN - The Intelligence Ministry on Saturday released details of the detection and dismantling of a terrorist network affiliated to the United States. In a coordinated operation on May 7, Iranian intelligence agents arrested the terrorist network’s members, who were identified in Fars, Khuzestan, Gilan, West Azerbaijan, and Tehran provinces, the Intelligence Ministry announcement said. Alan Note: trying to explain the recent bomb explosion at a Shiraz mosque, which killed well over 50 people and wounded another 200, the Mullahs, generally blamed for the self-inflicted event, first called it an accident caused by the detonation of various explosive devices on display at the mosque. The "display" ploy was an effort to rationalize why so much explosive material was stored at a mosque of the religion of peace. They also had to explain how posters of the young Shah, Reza Pahlavi managed, despite all stringent Mullah security measures, to appear on walls and public locations around the city of Shiraz and some locations in oil rich Khuzestan province. So why not concoct the lot into one "successful" counter-intelligence operation that makes fools of the CIA and makes the Mullahs look smart and vigilant. The group’s plans were devised in the U.S., according to the announcement, which added that they had planned to carry out a number of acts such as bombing scientific, educational, and religious centers, shooting people, and making public places in various cities insecure. One of the terrorists was killed in the operation, but the rest are in detention, the Intelligence Ministry said, adding that the group’s main objective was to create fear among the people. Alan note: fear of what? Of being rescued from the oppresssive suppresssion of the the Mullahs? The United States Central Intelligence Agency comprehensively supported the terrorist group by arming it, training its members, and sponsoring its inhumane activities in Iran, the Intelligence Ministry stated. The terrorists had maps, films, pictures, and sketches of important and sensitive sites in various cities in their possession when they were arrested. They also had a large number of weapons and ammunition and a great deal of highly explosive chemicals and cyanide. The blast at a religious center in Shiraz last month was carried out by this group, and it also had plans to carry out similar attacks on the Tehran International Book Fair, the Russian Consulate in Gilan Province, oil pipelines in southern Iran, and other targets, the communiqué stated. Interesting grab bag of locations with indicative hints at the thought process behind their choice, that have little or no political or tactical value as targets for the CIA nor for CIA sponsored anti-Mullah groups. BUT do serve to explain and justify the latest Mullah announced decision to multipy and strengthen the Bassiji (Suppression Forces) patrols in city streets around the country. Thirteen people (officially admitted figures) were killed and over 190 others wounded (close to reality) in a bombing carried out on April 12 at the Rahpuyan-e Vessal religious center, which is part of the Seyyed-ul-Shohada Mosque complex, located in a residential area of Shiraz.


Read this article about blasphemy BLASPHEMY click here and how easily false accusations reminiscent of ancient witch hunt days persist in Islam TODAY and can lead to death. And NOT a quick pleasant one as the video BELOW of an Islamic execution shows EXECUTION BY THE RELIGION OF PEACE click here

Monday, May 19, 2008


by Serge Trifkovic In the Counterjihad Vienna 2008: Defending Civil Liberties in Europe meet last weekend,� Serge Trifkovic, the author of Defeating Jihad: How the War on Terrorism Can Be Won - in Spite of Ourselves and The Sword of the Prophet: Islam; History, Theology, Impact on the World, gave the following speech. From the Gates of Vienna blog: ---- Vienna, May 10, 2008�Europe today is a powder keg,� Otto von Bismarck remarked, �and the leaders are like men smoking in an arsenal.�I am not going to waste your time tonight with yet another treatise on why Islam is not the Religion of Peace, Tolerance, Compassion, etc, etc. We are beyond that. Had America agonized, in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, whether Shinto was actually OK but only Bushido was bad, the Greater Asian Co-prosperity Sphere would be going strong to this day. Among reasonable people, unblinkered by the dicta of political correctitude, the real score on Muhammad and his followers is well known. It has been known for centuries. That score, however, no matter how calmly stated and comprehensively supported, invariably elicits the howls of �Islamophobia� from the neoliberal elite class.AN EMINENTLY POSTMODERN LITTLE PHOBIA. In the way of an introduction, let us therefore look at the formal, legally tested definition of that word, the latest addition to the arsenal of postmodern �phobias.� It is provided by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) based here in Vienna. (�Orwellian� is a worn-out adjective, but it simply has to be used in connection with this particular institution.) The EUMC diligently tracks the instances of �Islamophobia� all over the Old Continent, which it defines by eight red flags: Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change. Islam is seen as separate and �Other.� Islam is seen as inferior to the West, barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, linked to terrorism, engaged in a clash of civilizations Islam is seen as a political ideology. Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand. Discriminatory practices and Muslims� exclusion from mainstream society are advocated. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal This definition is obviously intended to preclude any possibility of meaningful discussion of Islam. As it happens, 1. � That Islam is static and unresponsive to change is evident from the absence of an internal, orthodox critique of jihad, sharia, jizya, etc. As Clement Huart pointed out back in 1907, �Until the newer conceptions, as to what the Koran teaches as to the duty of the believer towards non-believers, have spread further and have more generally leavened the mass of Moslem belief and opinion, it is the older and orthodox standpoint on this question which must be regarded by non-Moslems as representing Mohammedan teaching and as guiding Mohammedan action.� A century later his diagnosis still stands: it is not the jihadists who are �distorting� Islam; the would-be reformers are. 2. � That Islam is separate from our Western, Christian, European culture and civilization, and �other� than our culture and civilization, is a fact that will not change even if Europe eventually succumbs to the ongoing jihadist demographic onslaught. 3. � Whether Islam is �inferior to the West� is a matter of opinion, of course. That Islam cannot create a prosperous, harmonious, stable, creative, and attractive human society is not. Whether Islam is �barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist� is at least debatable; but that many of its tangible fruits are so, is all too painfully visible. 4. � Islam is seen by so many as �violent, aggressive, supportive of terrorism� not because of some irrational �phobia� in the feverish mind of the beholder, but because (a) of the clear mandate of its scripture; (b) of the record of its 14 centuries of historical practice; and above all (c) of the timeless example of its founder. 5. � �Islam is seen as a political ideology,� and it should be seen as one, because its key trait is a political program to improve man and create a new society; to impose complete control over that society; and to train cadres ready and eager to spill blood. This makes Islam closer to Bolshevism and to National Socialism than to any other religion. It breeds a gnostic paradigm within which the standard response to the challenge presented by �the Other,� i.e. non-Muslim societies and cultures, is implacable hostility and violence, or violent intent. 6. � Criticisms made of the West by Islam should not be rejected out of hand; they should be understood. Its chief �criticism� of the West - and of every other non-Islamic culture or tradition - is that it is infidel, and therefore undeserving of existence. 7. � A priori hostility towards Islam should not be �used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims.� Quite the contrary, an education campaign about the teaching and practice of Islam should result in legislative action that would exclude Islam from the societies it is targeting - not because it is an intolerant �religion,� but because it is an inherently seditious totalitarian ideology incompatible with the values of the West. 8. � And finally, while anti-Muslim hostility is not a priori �natural or normal,� the desire of non-Muslims to defend their lands, families, cultures and faith against Islamic aggression is �natural and normal�; but the elite class is actively trying to neutralize it. As the demand for Sharia-based communal self-rule is made with increasing frequency in the banlieus of Paris and the grim West Midlands council estates, Europe's elite class is ready to throw in the towel. Dutch Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner-a Christian Democrat!-sees the demand as perfectly legitimate and argues that sharia could be introduced �by democratic means.� Muslims have a right to follow the commands of their religion, even if that included some �dissenting rules of behavior�: �Could you block this legally? It would also be a scandal to say �this isn�t allowed�! The majority counts. That is the essence of democracy��� GUILT-RIDDEN FELLOW-TRAVELERS Such inanities are light years away from Winston Churchill�s warning, over a century ago, that "no stronger retrograde force exists in the world" than Islam: Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science-the science against which it had vainly struggled-the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome. Even Churchill�s prescience could not envisage the possibility that the invader would find his fellow-travellers at No. 10, Downing Street, at the European Union headquarters in Brussels, and in dozens of chancelleries and palaces across the Old Continent. Their joint efforts are helping change the face of Europe. The cumulative effect is not in doubt: by 2050, Muslims will account for over one-third of "Old Europe's young residents". Millions of them already live in a parallel universe that has very little to do with the host country, toward which they have a disdainful and hostile attitude. The elite class responds to such hostility with calls for ever-greater inclusiveness. Giuseppe Pisanu, Berlusconi's former minister of the interior, responsible for controlling the country's borders, thus declared five years ago that the high fatality rate of North African illegals on the high seas en route to Sicily was �a dreadful tragedy that weighs on the conscience of Europe.� His view was paradigmatic of the utopian liberal mind-set. If �Europe� should feel shame and guilt that people who have no right to come to its shores are risking their lives while trying to do so illegally, then only the establishment of a free passenger-ferry service between Tripoli and Palermo-with no passport or customs formalities required upon arrival, and a free shuttle to Rome or Milan-would offer some relief to that burdened conscience. And Sr Pisanu is supposedly a man of the �Right�!The tangible results of the leaders� moral decrepitude are devastating. A century ago, Sr. Pisanu and his class shared social commonalities that could be observed in Monte Carlo, Carlsbad, Biaritz or Paris, depending on the season. Englishmen, Russians, and Austrians shared the same outlook and sense of propriety, they all spoke French, but they nevertheless remained rooted in their national traditions, the permanent vessels in which Weltanschauung could be translated into Kultur. Today�s �United Europe,� by contrast, does not create social and civilizational commonalities except on the basis of wholesale denial of old mores, disdain for inherited values, and an overt rejection of �traditional� culture. It creates the dreary sameness of �antidiscriminationism� and �tolerance.� Such weakness breeds contempt and haughty arrogance on the other side. Take Tariq Ramadan, who calmly insists that Muslims in the West should conduct themselves as though they were already living in a Muslim-majority society and were exempt on that account from having to make concessions to the faith of the host-society. Muslims in Europe should feel entitled to live on their own terms, Ramadan says, while, �under the terms of Western liberal tolerance,� society as a whole should be �obliged to respect that choice.�If such �respect� continues to be extended by the elite class, by the end of this century there will be no �Europeans� as members of ethnic groups that share the same language, culture, history, and ancestors, and inhabit lands associated with their names. The shrinking native populations will be indoctrinated into believing-or else simply forced into accepting-that the demographic shift in favor of unassimilable and hostile aliens is actually a blessing that enriches their culturally deprived and morally unsustainable societies. The �liberal tolerance� and the accompanying �societal obligation� that Tariq Ramadan invokes thus become the tools of Western suicide. �No other race subscribes to these moral principles,� Jean Raspail wrote a generation ago, �because they are weapons of self-annihilation.� The weapons need to be discarded, and the upholders of those deadly �principles� removed from all positions of power and influence, if Europe is to survive. THE PATHOLOGY OF THE ELITE CLASS It is in the inability and unwillingness of the neoliberal elite class to confront the grave threat to our civilization that Western Europe and North America most tellingly certify that they share the same cultural chromosomes. In 1938 Hilaire Belloc wondered, �Will not perhaps the temporal power of Islam return and with it the menace of an armed Muhammadan world which will shake the dominion of Europeans-still nominally Christian-and reappear again as the prime enemy of our civilization?� Seven decades later, the same traits of decrepitude are present in Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Scandinavia, Canada, and the United States, including both the primary cause, which is the loss of religious faith, and several secondary ones. Topping the list is elite hostility to all forms of solidarity of the majority population based on shared historical memories, ancestors, and common culture; the consequences are predictable: the loss of a sense of place and history among Europeans and North Americans; rapid demographic decline, especially in Europe, unparalleled in history; rampant Third World (and in Europe, overwhelmingly Muslim) immigration; collapse of private and public manners, morals, and traditional commonalities; imposition of �diversity,� �multiculturalism,� �sensitivity�; and demonization and criminalization of any opposition to any of the above. The end-result is the Westerners� loss of the sense of propriety over their lands. Before 1914, both the West and the Muslim world could define themselves against each other in a cultural sense. The neoliberal elite insists on casting aside any idea of a specifically �Western� geographic and cultural space that should be protected from those who do not belong to it and have no rightful claim to it. The elite insists that our countries belong to the whole world.We face an elite consensus that de facto open immigration, multiculturalism, and the existence of a large Muslim Diaspora within the Western world are to be treated as a fixed and immutable fact that must not be scrutinized. That consensus, I contend, is ideological in nature, flawed in logic, dogmatic in application, and disastrous in its results. It needs to be tested against evidence, and not against the alleged norms of acceptable public discourse imposed by those who do not know Islam, or else do not want us to know the truth about it. In addition, a depraved mass culture and multiculturalist indoctrination in state schools and the mainstream media have already largely neutralized the sense of historical and cultural continuity among young West Europeans and North Americans. By contrast, the blend of soft porn and consumerism that targets every denizen of the Western world has not had the same effect on the Muslim diaspora in the West. The roll-call of Western-born and educated young Muslims supportive of terrorism confirms that failure.The loss of a sense of place and history experienced by millions of Westerners follows the emergence of two sides of the same coin: a neoliberal post-national hyper-state in Europe and the neoconservative �benevolent global hegemony� in the U.S. epitomized by the demand for an ever-growing NATO. These two mindsets, seemingly at odds, are but two aspects of the same emerging globalized universe, two sides of the same coin. The neoliberals advocate multilateralism in the form of an emerging �international community� framed by the United Nations and adjudicated by the International Criminal Court (ICC), with the EU acting as an interim medium for transferring sovereign prerogatives to a supra-national body; the neocons prefer to be the only cop in town. Both share the same distaste for traditional, naturally evolving societies and cultures.The revolutionary character of the multiculturalist project is revealed in the endless mantra of Race, Gender and Sexuality, the formula now elevated to the status of the post-modern Philosopher�s Stone, the force that moves the linear historical process forward, towards the grand Gleichschaltung of nations, races, and cultures that will mark the end of history. Race, Gender and Sexuality have replaced the Proletariat as both the oppressed underclass (hence the cult of the non-white, non-male, non-heterosexual victimhood), and as the historically preordained agent of revolutionary change. Classical Marxist political economy found the dynamics of revolution in the inevitable conflict between the owners of the means of production and the proletariat that has nothing to sell but its labor and nothing to lose but its chains. Latter-day Marxist revolutionaries go beyond dialectical materialism, however, by introducing a wholly metaphysical concept of victimhood and an array of associated special-rights claims that have worked such wonders for Islam all over the Western world. Majority populations of �old� Europe and America, in this insane but all-pervasive paradigm, are guilty of �oppression� by their very existence, and therefore must not protest the migratory deluge, let alone try to oppose it: that is �racism.�. The fruits are with us already. Gibbon could have had today�s Antwerp or Malmo in mind, or Marseilles, or Huddersfield, when he wrote of Rome in decline, its masses morphing �into a vile and wretched populace.� On present form, within a century the native Western majorities will melt away: � child-free� is a legitimate yuppie lifestyle term, on par with �fat-free� and �drug-free.� But whereas the threat of extinction of an exotic tribal group in Borneo or Amazonia - let alone a species of spotted owl or sperm whale - would cause alarm and prompt activism among neoliberal elites, it is deemed inherently racist to mention the fact that Europeans and their trans-Atlantic cousins are, literally, endangered species. There will be no grand synthesis, no civilizational cross-fertilization, between the West and Islam. Even the ultra-tolerant Dutch are beginning to see the light, pace Geert Wilders, but they are hamstrung by guilt-ridden self-haters and appeasers, whose hold on the political power, the media, and the academe is undemocratic, unnatural, and obscene. If Europe is to survive they need to be unmasked for what they are: traitors to their nations and their culture. They must be replaced by people ready and willing to subject the issues of immigration and identity to the test of democracy, unhindered by administrative or judicial fiat. If the coming war against jihad is to be won, the first task is to start talking frankly about the identity and character of the enemy and the nature of the threat. The obligation to do so is dictated by morality no less than by the need for self-preservation. �If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles,� says Sun Tzu. Well, we know the enemy. We know his core beliefs, his role models, his track-record, his mindset, his modus operandi, and his intentions. We also know his weaknesses, which are many, above all his inability to develop a prosperous economy or a functional, harmonious society. The main problem is with ourselves; or, to be precise, with those among us who have the power to make policy and shape opinions, and who will reject and condemn our diagnosis. Having absorbed postmodernist relativism, certain only of uncertainty, devoid of any faith except the faith in their own infallibility, members of the Western neoliberal elite class treat the jihadist mindset as a problem that can and should be treated by treating causes external to Islam itself. The result is a plethora of proposed �cures� that are as likely to succeed in making us safe from terrorism as snake oil is likely to cure leukemia. Abroad, we are told, we need to address political and economic grievances of the Muslim impoverished masses, we need to spread democracy and free markets in the Muslim world, we need to invest more in public diplomacy. At home we need more tolerance, greater inclusiveness, less profiling, and a more determined outreach to the minorities that feel marginalized. The predictable failure of such cures leads to ever more pathological self-scrutiny and to ever more morbid self-doubt. This vicious circle must be broken. BREAKING THE DEADLOCK The deadlock on the Somme in 1916, or at Verdun a year later, could not be broken with the ideas and modus operandi of Messrs. Haig, Foch, Cadrona or Hindenburg. It could have been unlocked, however, had Lidell-Hart, de Gaulle, or Guderian held the old guard�s ranks and positions. Winning a war demands �knowing the enemy and knowing oneself,� of course, but it also demands �thinking outside the box.� This clich� is apt: the magnitude of the threat demands radical responses that fall outside the cognitive parameters of the elite class.Let us therefore start our specific policy recommendations with the complex and emotionally charged issue of �human rights� versus national security. DEFINING ISLAMIC ACTIVISM - Instead of seeking a ban on all Muslim immigration right away, which is not a realistic goal at this moment, Western anti-jihadist activists should campaign for changes in immigration legislation of their home countries to include clauses that would exclude Islamic activists before they come, and have them deported if they are already infiltrated into the country. This demand needs to be made acceptable and attractive to a wide cross-section of the electorate regardless of political and ideological preferences. Therefore it should be focused on the Islamic activists' threat to the neoliberal values themselves: Discrimination against other religions (with special emphasis on the rising European phenomenon of Islamic anti-Semitism), outlooks (inc. atheism) and lifestyles; Discrimination and violence against women (esp. wives and �disobedient� daughters); Discrimination and violence against homosexuals; Threats of violence in any form and for whatever alleged �offense� or �insult� (e.g. drawing cartoons, making documentaries, writing books); Apology or justification for all of the above. It is essential to focus on the despicable acts themselves, and then drawing the direct line to the commands of Islam�s scripture and its founder, rather than doing it in reverse, as some well-meaning but politically less astute anti-jihadist activists do. NOTE: Antimullah has been trying to educate the West to recognize and counter jihad activities hiding behind the false "religious" claims aspects of Islam. This definition of Islamic activism would be a major step in the direction of denying actual or potential jihadists a foothold in Europe and the rest of the West. In the U.S. the broad model is provided by the old 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, the McCarran-Walter Act), mandating the exclusion or deportation of any alien who engaged or had purpose to engage in activities prejudicial to the public interest or subversive to national security. �Ideological� grounds for deportation were on the US statute books until 1990, when they were repealed by Congress. After the Russian revolution foreign communists were singled out for deportation. One night alone in January of 1920, more than 2,500 �alien radicals� were seized in thirty-three cities across the country and deported to their countries of origin. DENYING CITIZENSHIP TO ISLAMIC ACTIVISTS. I submit to you that all Western countries need laws that will treat any naturalized citizen�s or legally resident alien�s known adherence to an Islamist world outlook as excludable - on political, rather than �religious� grounds. It is politically feasible to articulate the demand that citizenship of a democratic Western country should be denied to all Islamic activists. In the United States a foreigner who becomes naturalized has to declare, on oath, �that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.� A declaration of this kind, of not a solemn oath of allegiance, is expected from naturalized citizens in most European countries. For a Muslim to declare all of the above in good faith, and especially that he accepts an �infidel,� i.e. non-Muslim document or law as the source of his highest loyalty, is an act of apostasy par excellence, punishable by death under the Islamic law. The sharia, to a Muslim, is not an addition to the �secular� legal code with which it coexists; it is the only true code, the only basis of obligation. To be legitimate, all political power therefore must rest exclusively with those who enjoy Allah�s authority on the basis of his revealed will - and for as long as they remain infidel, both Europe and America are illegitimate. So how can a self-avowedly devout Muslim take the oath, and expect the rest of us to believe that it was done in good faith? Because he is practicing taqiyya, the art of elaborate lying that was inaugurated by Muhammad to help destabilize and undermine non-Muslim communities almost ripe for a touch of Jihad. (Or else because he is not devout enough and confused, but in that case there is the ever-present danger that at some point he will rediscover his roots.) AUXILLIARY MEASURES:� Those who preach or promote jihad and advocate the introduction of sharia can and should be treated in exactly the same manner that adherents of other totalitarian ideologies had been treated in the free world during the Cold War. It will be a long and hard struggle to open the eyes of legislators and legal regulators that Islam itself is a radical, revolutionary ideology, inherently seditious and inimical to Western values and institutions, but it can be done. Other necessary measures would then follow, but to that end anti-jihadists should start articulating and advocating them now: Seek zero porosity of the borders. Preventing illegal immigration is a desirable objective per se; in the context of stopping terrorists it is mandatory. No anti-jihadist strategy is possible without complete physical control of borders. This is an issue on which a majority of the electorate of each and every Western country will agree - much to the chagrin of the liberal elites. Anti-jihadists should insist that all illegal immigration is a major security threat and that it can and should be subject to the letter of the law, and not to the suicidal dictates of the �human rights� lobby.� Demand mandatory cooperation of state agencies at all levels in identifying, registering and apprehending illegal immigrants and in assisting in their deportation - starting with those from nations and groups at risk for terrorism. It is a curious phenomenon in most Western countries that at various levels of state administration (e.g. welfare officers and social workers) and law enforcement (e.g. police forces in major cities) we encounter varying levels of tolerance, and even encouragement, of illegal immigrants� continued presence in the community. Again, this demand for simple compliance with the law by tax-funded public officers would be politically popular.� Discard the irrational ban on �profiling.� Not all Muslims are terrorists, of course, but all transnational terrorist networks that threaten Western countries� national security and way of life are composed of Muslims. It is time to accept that �profiling� based on a person�s appearance, origin, and apparent or suspected beliefs is an essential tool of trade of law enforcement and war on terrorism. Just ask the Israelis!� Subject the work of Islamic centers to legal limitations and security supervision. All over the Western world, Islamic centers have provided platforms for exhortations to the faithful to support causes and to engage in acts that are morally reprehensible, legally punishable, and detrimental to the host country�s national security. They have provided shelter to the outlaws, and offered recruitment to the leaders.� Treat affiliation with Islamic activism as grounds for denial or revoking of any level of security clearance. Such affiliation is incompatible with the requirements of personal commitment, patriotic loyalty and unquestionable reliability that are essential in the military, law enforcement, intelligence services, and other related branches of government (e.g. immigration control, airport security). Presence of practicing Muslims in any of these institutions would present an inherent risk to its integrity and would undermine morale. Acceptance of these proposals would represent a new start in devising long-term defense. The proposed measures recognize that we are in a war of ideas and religion, whether we want that or not and however much we hate the fact. They reflect the seriousness of the struggle. This war is being fought, on the Islamic side, with the deep condition that the West is on its last legs. The success of its demographic onslaught on Europe enhances the image of �a candy store with the busted lock,� and that view is reinforced by the evidence from history that a civilization that loses the urge for self-perpetuation is indeed in peril. CAN THE CANDY STORE WITH A BUSTED LOCK BE SAVED? The above proposals are not only pragmatic, they are morally just. They will elicit the accusation of �discrimination� from the self-hating segments of the elite class, even though no such label is applicable. Targeting people for screening, supervision and exclusion on the basis of their genes would be discriminatory indeed, but doing so because of their beliefs, ideas, actions, and intentions is justified and necessary. Orthodox Islamic beliefs, ideas and intentions as such pose a threat to the European civilization, culture, and way of life.The elite class rejects this diagnosis, of course, but among reasonable, well-informed citizens the debate must be conducted on terms liberated from the shackles of the elite class. Geert Wilders certainly shows the way. We should act accordingly, and never, ever be afraid of causing controversy. That means being subjected to the threat of legal proceedings by the neoliberal state - or to the threat of death, by those whom the neoliberal state continues to protect to the detriment of its own citizens. Western leaders did not agonize over communism�s �true� nature during the Berlin air lift in 1949, or in Korea in 1950, but acted effectively to contain it by whatever means necessary. Yes, back then we had a legion of Moscow�s apologists, character witnesses, moles and fellow-travelers, assuring us that the Comrades want nothing but social justice at home and peaceful coexistence abroad. They held tenured chairs at prestigious universities and dominated all smart salons, from London and Paris to New York. They explained away and justified the inconsistencies and horrifyingly violent implications of the source texts of Marx and Lenin. They explained away and justified the appalling fruits: the bloodbath of the Revolution, the genocidal great famine, the show trials and purges, the killing of millions of innocents in the Gulag, the pact with Hitler, the works. Today their spiritual heirs in politics, the academy and the media establishment act as Islam�s apologists, character witnesses and fellow travelers. They flatly deny or else explain away, with identical scholastic sophistry and moral depravity, the dark and violent implications of the source texts, the Kuran and the Hadith, the deeply unnerving career of Muhammad, and centuries of conquests, wars, slaughters, subjugation, decline without fall, spiritual and material misery, and murderous fanaticism. NIL DESPERANDUM! Some eighty years ago Julien Benda published his tirade against the intellectual corruption of his times, The treason of the intellectuals. For generations prior to the 20th century, Benda wrote, members of the Western intellectual elite ensured that �humanity did evil, but honored good.� The �Treason� of the title occurred when they gave up promoting lasting civilizational values in favor of short-term political preferences. Benda wrote at a time when fascism, nazism and bolshevism dominated Europe�s scene. Today the �treason� of the elite class takes a different form. It upholds the allegedly universal values of multiculturalism, inclusiveness and antidiscriminationism to the detriment of the particular value of our civilization and all its fruits. The propensity of the elite class to the betrayal of our culture remains the same, however.The fact that normal people don�t realize the magnitude of the problem works to the advantage of the people like Solana, Soros, Blair, Prodi, or Hillary Clinton. Their ideas, which but two generations ago would have been deemed eccentric or insane, now rule the Euro-American mainstream. Only a society inured to the concept of open borders can be unblinkingly told that Islam is good and tolerant, that �we� (the West) have been nasty and unkind to it over the centuries - remember the Crusades! - and that �terrorism� needs to be understood, and cured, by social therapy that is independent of Islam�s teaching and practice. At the root of the domestic malaise is the notion that countries do not belong to the people who have inhabited them for generations, but to whoever happens to be within their boundaries at any given moment in time - regardless of his culture, attitude, or intentions. The resulting random melange of mutually disconnected multitudes is supposed to be a blessing that enriches an otherwise arid and monotonous society.A further pernicious fallacy is the dictum that we should not feel a special bond for any particular country, nation, race, or culture, but transfer our preferences on the whole world, �the Humanity,� equally. Such notions have been internalized by the elite class in America and Western Europe to the point where they actively help Islamic terrorism. In America the process has been under way for decades. By 1999 then-Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott felt ready to declare that the United States may not exist �in its current form� in the 21st century, because the very concept of nationhood - here and throughout the world - will have been rendered obsolete. A generation earlier such uttering from a senior government official would have caused a scandal. By the end of the 20th century such declarations bothered only the unsophisticates who persist in assuming that the purpose of what Dr. Talbott was doing at the Department of State was to ensure the survival, security and prosperity of the United States within the international system, rather than its eventual absorption by the system. But his was an exultant prophecy, not an impartial assessment. The ideological foundation for Talbott's beliefs was stated bluntly: �All countries are basically social arrangements, accommodations to changing circumstances. No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary.� To the members of his class, all countries are but transient, virtual-reality entities. Owing emotional allegiance to any one of them is irrational, and risking one�s life for its sake is absurd.The refusal of theWestern elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history. It is rooted in the mindset that breeds the claim that �force is not an answer� to terrorism, that profiling is bad and open borders are good, that �true� Islam is peaceful and the West is wicked. The upholders of such claims belong to the culture that has lost its bond with nature, history, and the supporting community. In the meantime, thanks to them, the quiet onslaught continues unabated, across the Straits of Gibraltar, through JFK and O�Hare, Heathrow and Schiphol. Far from enhancing diversity, it threatens to impose a numbing sameness and eradicate the identity of target-populations, to demolish their special character and uniqueness.That supporting community, the real nation, is still out there, in North America and Europe alike, working and paying taxes and grinning and bearing it. When it is told of Islam�s �peace and tolerance,� it grumbles about someone�s stupidity or ineptitude, but it still does not suspect outright betrayal. The betrayers, meanwhile, promote an ideology of universal human values, of a common culture for the whole world. They may not even realize why they abet Islam. For all the outward differences, they share with the mullahs and sheikhs and imams the desire for a monistic One World. They both long for Talbot�s Single Global Authority, post-national and seamlessly standardized, an Ummah under a fancy secular name.Those Americans and Europeans who love their lands and nations more than any others, and who put their families and their neighborhoods before all others, are normal people. Those who tell them that their attachments should be global and that their lands and neighborhoods belong to the whole world are sick and evil. They are our enemies and jihad�s indispensable objective allies.The elite class, rootless, arrogant, cynically manipulative, has every intention of continuing to �fight� the war on terrorism without naming the enemy, without revealing his beliefs, without unmasking his intentions, without offending his accomplices, without expelling his fifth columnists, and without ever daring to win.It is up to the millions of normal Europeans and their American cousins to stop the madness. The traitor class wants them to share its death wish, to self-annihilate as people with a historical memory and a cultural identity, and to make room for the post-human, monistic Utopia spearheaded by the jihadist fifth column.This crime can and must be stopped. The founders of the United States overthrew the colonial government for offenses far lighter than those of which the traitor class is guilty.