Monday, January 30, 2012


Obama the Chicken is Being Plucked

By Mark McGrew

January 29 through the 31st, 5% of the sheriffs in America are in Las Vegas Nevada, learning how to tell the Federal government agents to pack sand and get out of town. 20% of the 50 United States of America have been presented with lawsuits and or legal filings challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to be on the ballot for the 2012 election.

Congressional representative Allen West summed up the American people's feelings for the Obama administration today when he told Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to, "Get the hell out of The United States of America!". His talk can be seen here.

Ten people will be murdered today in Mexico with guns provided to drug cartels by Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General. Politicians are calling for him to resign. Resign??

There is enough evidence presented to Congress to arrest him and prosecute him for an Act of War against the nation of Mexico, accessory to murder of thousands of innocent citizens in Mexico and America as well as the murder of United States Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. Resign?? Besides sending illegal guns to Mexico, Holder and his associates sold guns to criminal street gangs inside the United States where the guns will be used inside the United States. It will take years to find the thousands of guns these criminals sold to killers.

Eric Holder and his criminal operatives in his office and the Department of Justice need to be dragged out in handcuffs, jailed with no bail and put on trial with a jury of American citizens who are not federal government employees.

Like a dead chicken being plucked, Obama has lost his power and his support. Six months or so ago, French President Sarkozy called Obama, "Insane". Other world leaders have publicly called him incompetent and other derogatory names.

Since then, major news in America has been slowly, quietly, as if testing the waters, pointing out Obama's faults and crimes. Little by little they are feeding America, and the World, the truth about the man they fought so hard to cover up for these past four years. Feather by feather, the chicken known as Obama, is being plucked. The most hated psychopath on Earth and his administration are going to be thoroughly plucked, gutted, tossed in an oven, cooked and devoured. And like any dead carcass with no use, Obama and his faithful supporters will be thrown onto a garbage heap until they rot to nothing.

The thing known as Obama is committing one large theft after another of the American people's money, work and trust. He is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.

Like all stupid people, he thinks everyone else is stupider than he is. There is, however, one thing he has done well. Every facet of American life and business has gone down considerably, except for foreclosures, unemployment, bankruptcies and business closures.

The mistake he made was to think that We the People, would just sit back and take his arrogant insulting crap.

Pamela Barnett was a plaintiff in a case brought by Orly Taiz demanding proof that Obama was eligible to be President. That court arrogantly and illegally refused to hear their complaint. Pamela Barnett's character reflects that of most Americans: When you treat her like a dog, she'll jump up and bite you. So she formed an organization to teach and help people how to have Obama taken off of all 50 State ballots. And it is working very well. Her site is here:

And it is working. Obama has been denied to be on the primary ballot in Alabama until he proves he is eligible. Georgia has a ruling pending in 3 weeks to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible.

The amazingly tenacious, Carl Swensson, fighting to get Obama out of the office of the President, by knocking on every official's door he could find for four years, finally found two government employees who were not traitors and took their Oath of Office seriously: The Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp and Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia Office of Administrative Hearings.

Meet Carl Swensson at this site:

And quit being a jerk. Send him 5 or 10 bucks for his legal bills. His wife wants him home to spend more time with the cat. Carl Swensson credits his wife for his stamina in being able to run his business and being able to expend the energy and the capital in fighting the treasonous federal elected employees.

Only a Natural Born Citizen can be President. There are at least three US Supreme Court cases defining Natural Born Citizen. The Us Constitution refers to "The Law of Nations", which defines Natural Born Citizen. There are dozens of letters of correspondence from the signers of the Declaration of Independence and creators of the US Constitution defining Natural Born Citizen. The United States Congress, in the past nine years has made eight unsuccessful attempts to change the wording of the US Constitution to say that foreign born or children of foreign born parents can be the President of the United States of America. These elected employees have repeatedly proven that they know damn well what a Natural Born Citizen is. The record is clearly established, through over 250 years of acknowledged definition that Natural Born Citizen is a person born on American soil, to PARENTS plural. For liberals and democrats and other traitors, that means that in order for a person to be our President, the stork has to deliver him inside America and both his mommy and daddy must be citizens of the United States of America.

So, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, California, Hawaii and Arizona have either lawsuits filed or ballot challenges filed to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible to run for election. Activities are going on in 26 other states, with the same goal in mind, to keep Obama off the ballot, unless he can prove he is eligible to run. This is further proof that it is the states that control the federal government and not the other way around. The federal government is a group of full time employees managing certain pertinent affairs concerning the states. These permanent employees are managed by part-time employees called politicians, which are periodically elected by the People. They are all expendable. It is these temporary employees who we accuse of committing treason and other High Crimes against the citizens of America as well as other Nations of the World..

In New Hampshire, Orly Taitz appeared before election officials asking them to take Obama off the ballot because he is not eligible. Their response was basically, "Well, we don't have to look at any evidence. We take the man for his word."

The crowd attending, We the People, erupted with shouts of "Traitors!....Treason!!". The sissy boy assistant attorney General got so scared he ran into another room, locked the door and called the State police to protect him. (The police are "investigating". Which, in New Hampshire, means "You get what you pay for.")

This is a good place to learn how people are fighting Obama across the USA.

In business, we realize that the Internet was invented to destroy your competition. And it works in politics too. As seen in Greece, Italy and across North Africa. Obama is such an IDIOT!

When his eligibility problem came up in 2008, because of a phony Birth Certificate he presented, he said, "Ah, people will forget about that in two weeks." Since then, millions of people have tried countless ways to get a case into court to compel Obama to prove he is eligible to hold the office of President.

Until Carl Swensson's case, not one of 40 or so lawsuits against Obama has been able to make it to court. Judges from coast to coast muttered the terminology of, "You don't have standing." Telling the American People that they do not have a right to question if someone is eligible under our constitution to hold the office of President. We believe these judges are guilty of Treason against the American People and should be arrested and put on trail for it.

I can not scream loud enough to express the absolute RAGE that the American People have against the criminal syndicates, known as the Federal Government and Republican and Democratic political parties.

Only because of the Internet have we been able to inform the World of the criminal activities of the Obama administration. Major news has been overwhelmingly vicious in their attempts to keep the Obama administration crimes secret. They have done everything they could to ridicule, insult, vilify and harass any person they invited on their shows to "discuss this issue". We the People, believe they also are complicit in committing Treason against the American People.

Because of their traitorous actions, they have lost huge numbers of TV viewers and newspaper readers. Newspapers across the country are going broke and they are too stupid to figure out why. Here's a clue: People are not stupid and they do not like being lied to and played for suckers.

We the People, with the Internet news sites we own, are bigger than major news. We have more investigators, more reporters, more audience and much more news produced every month. What we don't have, that major news does have, is the financial support from large corporations. Maybe because large corporations are profiting so well from a fascist government.

We the People, are bigger than the Federal government. We have more people and more guns. If the Federal government was not afraid of us, they would already have tanks in the streets and fighter jets and bombers in the air, as they did in Libya and countless other countries.

Most people in control of the armaments of the Federal government know that We the People do not want war with our government. We just want them to get their policies the hell out of the United States of America. We the People, would prefer they be put in prison for the rest of their twisted rotten lives. Myself, I would prefer to see the male traitors put in a 50 foot deep hole, the size of a football field, fill a horse trough with water once a week and send down a live cow once a month. Punishment for the female traitors, including Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton, I would send them to a bordello in Bolivia, Mogadishu or some other hell hole.

We don't need no stinkin' commies, Marxists, fascists or socialists. And we sure as Hell, don't want some criminally insane imitation of a man making orders, thinking he can murder anyone, anywhere on Earth, or put American citizens in secret prisons, even if he does have a phony birth certificate.

Unless he can PROVE he is eligible to hold the office of President, which he can't under his own admissions, every law, treaty, agreement or promise he has made are null and void. An incredible amount of criminal charges, including fraud for every donation he took, up to Sedition (creating contempt for your government) to Treason as well as a myriad of criminal charges against every Congressman who supported him, the managers of the Republican National Party and the Democratic National party, every one of the 50 Secretaries of State who allowed him on the ballot, Hawaii Department of Health employees who lied about his Birth Certificate and the list goes on and on.

Americans are finally understanding why, in many countries in the World, when new people take power, they have a purge of the old system by getting rid of the old regime through murder or imprisonment. In America, we would need to purge a minimum of 600,000 people from our elementary, junior and high schools, universities, city, county, state and federal government, newscasters, news station owners, newspaper writers, newspaper owners and the list can be huge to get rid of the anti-American traitorous degenerates.

When Obama and his associates are removed from American society, as We the People want to, We are ready to and We will gladly, extend our friendship to the many nations in this home we call Earth.

Until then, to the many world leaders who did not bother to ask the one simple question: "Who is Barack Hussein Obama?" I have this to say: "Congratulations smart guy. How's it feel to be played for a sucker?" We saw you laughing your butts off, knowing Obama was going to strip us dry and give the money to your gangster banker friends. We don't see you in your elevated shoes with your botched plastic surgery face's wives, laughing too much now. We see your cities falling like dominoes to Islamic immigrants. We see your cities burning on the nightly news. We see your cities as residence of the most raped women on Earth. Family fortunes, intact for centuries, evaporated like a drop of water on a red hot skillet. Chaos, ruin, destruction. All because your pea brained minds were too drunk with power and you were mesmerized with an insatiable greed. You saw the biggest fraud in history standing right in front of you and were so stupid, you actually thought you were the bird and not the worm.

To the People of this world, who are suffering from the policies of Obama, I say to you all: "So do something about it. Go to any Internet site you know that is fighting the corrupt American government and donate some cash or offer to help in some way to spread their news. That is the least that any honest person can do."

And to the people who voted for Obama, because he was going to steal our money and our creations and fraudulently turn them over to you: "How's that Hope and Change working out for you?"

Mark S. McGrew can be reached at More of his articles, published on over 900 websites, in 28 countries, in 8 languages, are on . When reprinting this article, please include a link to the free press of Pravda.Ru and a special thanks to Pravda's English editor, Dmitry Sudakov.

Дмитрий Судаков

Saturday, January 28, 2012


Obama and his lawyers boycotted the hearing

video #1!

video 2

video 3

video 4

video 5

video 6


(Received Email)

Regardless of what you think about the slate of Republicans asking for the job.....would any of them be capable of matching this record ???

I think not. O.M.G! (Obama Must Go!)


An old West Virginia Hillbilly saying:

“You cannot get the water to clear up

until you get the pigs out of the creek.”



*If any other of our presidents had doubled the national debt,

which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate,

in one year,

would you have approved?*

*If any other of our presidents had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years,

would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had criticized a state law

that he admitted he never even read,

would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head? *

*If any other of our presidents joined the country of Mexico

and sued a state in the United States to force that state

to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on? *

*If any other of our presidents had pronounced the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse, would you think him an idiot? *

*If any other of our presidents had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one foreign company had an accident,

would you have agreed? *

*If any other of our presidents had used a forged document

as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him? *

*If any other of our presidents had been the first President to need a Teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? *

*If any other of our presidents had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take his First Lady to a play in NYC,

would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had reduced your retirement plan holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had given the Queen of England

an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought it a proud moment for America ? *

*If any other of our presidents had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? *

*If any other of our presidents had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had stated that there were 57 states in the United States , wouldn't you have had second thoughts about his capabilities? *

*If any other of our presidents would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in his home town,

would you not have thought he was a

self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk. *

*If any other of our presidents had been so Spanish illiterate

as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again,

wouldn't you have winced in embarrassment? *

*If any other of our presidents had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?*

*If any other of our presidents' administrations had okayed

Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic,

would you have wondered whether they actually forgot what happened on 9-11? *

*If any other of our presidents had failed to send relief aid

to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed

or made homeless than in New Orleans ,

would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? *

*If any other of our presidents had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America ,

would you have ever approved. *

*If any other of our presidents had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? *

OR if in a State of the Union Speech if any of the other presidents had PRAISED AND TOUTED a company to whom he had given $118 million of taxpayer money and within 24-hours that company declared Bankruptcy. Would you have felt he had good judgement?

SPECIALLY after he had recently used over $500 million of taxpayer money on a company called Solyndra - after being warned it was foundering and ignored teh warning and washed this money down the drain?

Specially after washing TENS OF BILLIONS OF taxpayer DOLLARS on nearly a dozen similar Green Energy failures!

All the while blocking any onshore or offshore drilling inside the USA or develop of our huge gas reserves and ensuring our continued reliance on foreign oil and preventing our financial recovery?

AND VETOING the Canadian shale oil Keystone pipeline so the oil would go to China instead of creating jobs and revenue in America?

Would you have thought he was sane and favored America and Americans?

*So, tell me again,

what is it about Obama

that makes him so brilliant and impressive? *

*Can't think of anything?

Don't worry.

He's done all this in 34 months – so you don’t have that much time to come up with an answer.*

*Every statement and action in this email is factual

and directly attributable to Barrack Hussein Obama.

Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable. *





*"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."*

Tuesday, January 24, 2012


byByron York Chief Political Correspondent

The Romney campaign has been hitting Newt Gingrich hard over the 1990s ethics case that resulted in the former Speaker being reprimanded and paying a $300,000 penalty. Before the Iowa caucuses, Romney and his supporting super PAC did serious damage to Gingrich with an ad attacking Gingrich's ethics past. Since then, Romney has made other ads and web videos focusing on the ethics matter, and at the Republican debate in Tampa Monday night, Romney said Gingrich "had to resign in disgrace."

In private conversations, Romney aides often mention the ethics case as part of their larger argument that Gingrich would be unelectable in a race against President Obama.

Given all the attention to the ethics matter, it's worth asking what actually happened back in 1995, 1996, and 1997. The Gingrich case was extraordinarily complex, intensely partisan, and driven in no small way by a personal vendetta on the part of one of Gingrich's former political opponents. It received saturation coverage in the press; a database search of major media outlets revealed more than 10,000 references to Gingrich's ethics problems during the six months leading to his reprimand.

It ended with a special counsel hired by the House Ethics Committee holding Gingrich to an astonishingly strict standard of behavior, after which Gingrich in essence pled guilty to two minor offenses.

Afterwards, the case was referred to the Internal Revenue Service, which conducted an exhaustive investigation into the matter. And then, after it was all over and Gingrich was out of office, the IRS concluded that Gingrich did nothing wrong. After all the struggle, Gingrich was exonerated.

I wrote about the matter at the time, first in a 1995 article about Gingrich's accusers and then in a 1999 piece on the Internal Revenue Service report that cleared Gingrich. (Both pieces were for The American Spectator; I'm drawing on them extensively, but unfortunately neither is available online.)


At the center of the controversy was a course Gingrich taught from 1993 to 1995 at two small Georgia colleges. The wide-ranging class, called "Renewing American Civilization," was conceived by Gingrich and financed by a tax-exempt organization called the Progress and Freedom Foundation. Gingrich maintained that the course was a legitimate educational enterprise; his critics contended that it had little to do with learning and was in fact a political exercise in which Gingrich abused a tax-exempt foundation to spread his own partisan message.

The Gingrich case was driven in significant part by a man named Ben Jones. An actor and recovered alcoholic who became famous for playing the dim-witted Cooter in the popular 1980s TV show The Dukes of Hazzard, Jones ran for Congress as a Democrat from Georgia in 1988. He won and served two terms. He lost his bid for re-election after re-districting in 1992, and tried again with a run against Gingrich in 1994. Jones lost decisively, and after that, it is fair to say he became obsessed with bringing Gingrich down.

Two days before Election Day 1994, with defeat in sight, Jones hand-delivered a complaint to the House ethics committee (the complaint was printed on "Ben Jones for Congress" stationery). Jones asked the committee to investigate the college course, alleging that Gingrich "fabricated a 'college course' intended, in fact, to meet certain political, not educational, objectives." Three weeks later, Jones sent the committee 450 pages of supporting documents obtained through the Georgia Open Records Act.

That was the beginning of the investigation. Stunned by their loss of control of the House -- a loss engineered by Gingrich -- House Democrats began pushing a variety of ethics complaints against the new Speaker. Jones' complaint was just what they were looking for.

There's no doubt the complaint was rooted in the intense personal animus Jones felt toward Gingrich. In 1995, I sat down with Jones for a talk about Gingrich, and without provocation, Jones simply went off on the Speaker. "He's just full of s--t," Jones told me. "He is. I mean, the guy's never done a damn thing, he's never worked a day in his life, he's never hit a lick at a snake. He's just a bulls--t artist. I mean, think about it. What has this guy ever done in his life?…Gingrich has never worked. He's never had any life experience. He's very gifted in his way at a sort of rhetorical terrorism, and he's gifted in his way at being a career politician, someone who understands how that system works and how to get ahead in it, which is everything that he has derided for all these years. So I think he's a hypocrite, and I think he's a wuss, and I don't mind saying that to him or whoever. To his mother -- I don't care."

At that point, Jones leaned over to speak directly into my recorder. Raising his voice, he declared: "HE'S THE BIGGEST A--HOLE IN AMERICA!"

Jones and his partner in the Gingrich crusade, Democratic Rep. David Bonior -- they had been basketball buddies in the House gym -- pushed the case ceaselessly. Under public pressure, the Ethics Committee -- made up of equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats -- took up the case and hired an outside counsel, Washington lawyer James Cole, to conduct the investigation.

Cole developed a theory of the case in which Gingrich, looking for a way to spread his political views, came up with the idea of creating a college course and then devised a way to use a tax-exempt foundation to pay the bills. "The idea to develop the message and disseminate it for partisan political use came first," Cole told the Ethics Committee. "The use of the [the Progress and Freedom Foundation] came second as a source of funding." Thus, Cole concluded, the course was "motivated, at least in part, by political goals." Cole argued that even a hint of a political motive, was enough to taint the tax-exempt project, "regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes that are present."

Cole did not argue that the case was not educational. It plainly was. But Cole suggested that the standard for determining wrongdoing was whether any unclean intent lurked in the heart of the creator of the course, even if it was unquestionably educational.

Meanwhile, Democrats kept pushing to raise the stakes against Gingrich. "Anyone who has engaged in seven years of tax fraud to further his own personal and political benefits is not deserving of the speakership," Bonior said just before Christmas 1996. "Mr. Gingrich has engaged in a pattern of tax fraud, lies, and cover-ups in paving his road to the second highest office in the land…I would expect the Justice Department, the FBI, a grand jury, and other appropriate entities to investigate."

With the charges against Gingrich megaphoned in the press, Gingrich and Republicans were under intense pressure to end the ordeal. In January, 1997, Gingrich agreed to make a limited confession of wrongdoing in which he pleaded guilty to the previously unknown offense of failing to seek sufficiently detailed advice from a tax lawyer before proceeding with the course. (Gingrich had in fact sought advice from two such lawyers in relation to the course.) Gingrich also admitted that he had provided "inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable" information to Ethics Committee investigators. That "inaccurate" information was Gingrich's contention that the course was not political -- a claim Cole and the committee did not accept, but the IRS later would.

In return for those admissions, the House reprimanded Gingrich and levied an unprecedented $300,000 fine. The size of the penalty was not so much about the misdeed itself but the fact that the Speaker was involved in it.

Why did Gingrich admit wrongdoing? "The atmosphere at the time was so rancorous, partisan, and personal that everyone, including Newt, was desperately seeking a way to end the whole thing," Gingrich attorney Jan Baran told me in 1999. "He was admitting to whatever he could to get the case over with."

It was a huge victory for Democrats. They had deeply wounded the Speaker. But they hadn't brought him down. So, as Bonior suggested, they sought to push law enforcement to begin a criminal investigation of Gingrich.

Nothing happened with the Justice Department and the FBI, but the IRS began an investigation that would stretch over three years. Unlike many in Congress -- and journalists, too -- IRS investigators obtained tapes and transcripts of each session during the two years the course was taught at Kennesaw State College in Georgia, as well as videotapes of the third year of the course, taught at nearby Reinhardt College. IRS officials examined every word Gingrich spoke in every class; before investigating the financing and administration of the course, they first sought to determine whether it was in fact educational and whether it served to the political benefit of Gingrich, his political organization, GOPAC, or the Republican Party as a whole. They then carefully examined the role of the Progress and Freedom Foundation and how it related to Gingrich's political network.

In the end, in 1999, the IRS released a densely written, highly detailed 74-page report. The course was, in fact, educational, the IRS said. "The overwhelming number of positions advocated in the course were very broad in nature and often more applicable to individual behavior or behavioral changes in society as a whole than to any 'political' action," investigators wrote.

"For example, the lecture on quality was much more directly applicable to individual behavior than political action and would be difficult to attempt to categorize in political terms. Another example is the lecture on personal strength where again the focus was on individual behavior. In fact, this lecture placed some focus on the personal strength of individual Democrats who likely would not agree with Mr. Gingrich on his political views expressed in forums outside his Renewing American Civilization course teaching. Even in the lectures that had a partial focus on broadly defined changes in political activity, such as less government and government regulation, there was also a strong emphasis on changes in personal behavior and non-political changes in society as a whole."

The IRS also checked out the evaluations written by students who completed the course. The overwhelming majority of students, according to the report, believed that Gingrich knew his material, was an interesting speaker, and was open to alternate points of view. None seemed to perceive a particular political message. "Most students," the IRS noted, "said that they would apply the course material to improve their own lives in such areas as family, friendships, career, and citizenship."

Alan Note: no wonder Gingrich is rising and the Democrats are scared witless of his becoming President! He actually does something positive!

The IRS concluded the course simply was not political. "The central problem in arguing that the Progress and Freedom Foundation provided more than incidental private benefit to Mr. Gingrich, GOPAC, and other Republican entities," the IRS wrote, "was that the content of the 'Renewing American Civilization' course was educational...and not biased toward any of those who were supposed to be benefited."

The bottom line: Gingrich acted properly and violated no laws. There was no tax fraud scheme. Of course, by that time, Gingrich was out of office, widely presumed to be guilty of something, and his career in politics was (seemingly) over.

Back in January 1997, the day after Cole presented his damning report to the Ethics Committee, the Washington Post's front-page LYING banner headline was "Gingrich Actions 'Intentional' or 'Reckless'; Counsel Concludes That Speaker's Course Funding Was 'Clear Violation' of Tax Laws."

That same day, the New York Times ran eleven stories on the Gingrich matter, four of them on the front page (one inside story was headlined, "Report Describes How Gingrich Used Taxpayers' Money for Partisan Politics"). On television, Dan Rather began the CBS Evening News by telling viewers that "only now is the evidence of Newt Gingrich's ethics violations and tax problems being disclosed in detail."

The story was much different when Gingrich was exonerated. The Washington Post ran a brief story on page five.

The Times ran an equally brief story on page 23.

And the evening newscasts of CBS, NBC, and ABC -- which together had devoted hours of coverage to the question of Gingrich's ethics -- did not report the story at all. Not a word.

Gingrich himself, not wanting to dredge up the whole ugly tale, said little about his exoneration. "I consider this a full and complete vindication," he wrote in a brief statement. "I urge my colleagues to go back and read their statements and watch how they said them, with no facts, based on nothing more than a desire to politically destroy a colleague."

(As Mitt Romney, despite knowing the truth, is doing all again.

Now, Gingrich is saying much the same thing in the face of Romney's accusations. And despite the prominence of the matter in the GOP race, few outsiders seem inclined to dive back into the ethics matter to determine whether Gingrich deserves the criticism or not. But if Gingrich is to have any hope of climbing out from under the allegations, he'll have to find some way of letting people know what really happened.

Saturday, January 21, 2012




Text window at the end is scrollable.

Unable to quickly find a high value target in America, the Islamic Mullahs supported by Obama and increasingly by Ron Paul assassinate a young Persian student scientist in an unequal and senseless show of violent Islamic irritation.

Iran has infiltrated so many trained agents into American universities that hitmen are everywhere and waiting for orders and designation of a target. Or asked to designate one and "terminate with extreme prejudice"!

Equally, over the last decade, an estimated 40,000 suiciders have also been infiltrated deep into mosques among our neighborhood societies waiting to be callled up for missions to explode themselves and kill as many people as they can in places filled with innocent members of the public, at shopping malls and with roadside IED explosive devices, killing those who have little or nothing to do with Islam.

Obama supports Iran on purpose but Ron Paul is clueless, or pretends to be, to hold onto his liberal following.

We need Newt Gingrich voted into the Oval Office to put an end to our toe-licking (to be polite) and not all our international visitors know what "brown-nosing" means,  handling of Islamists as currently happening in the Obama White House. Which turns a blind eye on assassinations by the Islamic regime of Iran - or drug cartels which partner with them - as long as the target is not a prominent person like a Saudi ambassador. The occasional Border Patrol agent seems to be OK and Dept. of INJustice chief Eric Holder runs interference and grants immunity for the killers.

There is very little if anything "peaceful" about Islam and Sharia law.


Iranian regime supporters carried pictures of Barack Obama (their ardent protector) and shouted “Death to America” at the funeral procession of assassinated nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan last week.

The Iranian regime released details of Barack Obama’s letter to the Islamic state. Obama told the regime that the US will not take hostile against against Iran. Iranian Mehr News reported:

A number of Iranian officials have released the details of the letter that U.S. President Barack Obama recently sent to Tehran. The New York Times, citing U.S. government officials, wrote on January 12 that the Obama administration had sent a message to Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei warning that closing the Strait of Hormuz is a “red line” that would provoke a response by the United States.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Ramin Mehmanparast said on January 15 that U.S. officials had sent a message on the Strait of Hormuz to the Islamic Republic through three officials, noting, “Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, delivered a letter to Mohammad Khazaii, the Islamic Republic of Iran’s ambassador (to the UN). The Swiss ambassador to Tehran (Livia Leu Agosti) also conveyed the message, and Jalal Talabani, the Iraqi president, conveyed the message to officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran as well.”

Dumb-ass Obama has called for negotiations!! The Koran, of which he speaks so highly, states muslims shouldn’t raise their swords against one another.

Bow and scrape, and admonish the Iranians, If you cross our red line, we shall become ever so angry, stamp our feet and yell a great deal.

If there is not some way the prospective Republican nominee could build on this lapse in judgment on Obama’s part, there shall be no hope of breaking through this bubble of madness that surrounds the Oval Office currently.

Unfit does not cover it. Incompetent is just too kind a word. This is on the borderline of babbling idiocy. It is a source of amazement that this moron remembers to draw breath at times.

“He has stated in the letter that they will not take any hostile action against the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he added.

“In the letter, Obama has announced readiness for negotiation and the resolution of mutual disagreements,” he added.

You destroyed the basis for negotiation.

...the Obama administration had sent a message ... warning that closing the Strait of Hormuz is a “red line” that would provoke a response by the United States.

So much for that empty threat, you Dufus!

Candidate obama did tell us that if the political winds in the middle east turned ugly, he would stand with islam. Now practising what he preached.

Hat Tip FreeRepublic

Friday, January 20, 2012


Google initially prevented this article from publishing on the Blog!!!

Then decided that the "apparent danger/warning triggers/words" in the text were NOT "dangerous" and allowed it to be "saved" and then published. I understand the caution, though not the temporary censorship,  and the honorable good sense finally shown in allowing truth to be posted.

Not a attack on Obama as a person BUT definitely an attack on that man's moronic policies and equally moronic political actions aimed at destroying America in favor of his corrupt supporters! Such as vetoing the Keystone oil pipeline and his Solyndra funding AND nearly a dozen other terribly unprofitablye"green energy" funding by him.

The only GREAT job he has achieved successfully is how best to destroy America, which his puppeteers George Soros and the Moslem Brotherhood, both ardent enemies of the USA are jigging him to to do. Even paying taxpayer money for less good aircraft made in Brazil (a Soros investment territory) rather than long-time USA versions.

With a president like that who needs any other enemies?

Obama's First TV Advertisement!!!

Energy: In his very first TV ad of the 2012 campaign, the president is feeding the public false information about America's dependence on foreign fuels. His twisted statistics actually celebrate the Obama recession.

The Obama re-election campaign is already shaping up as the most deceitful in American electoral history. "For the first time in 13 years our dependence on foreign oil is below 50%," the commercial declares, accompanied by goose-bumpy music.

Major economic downturns, in fact, unfailingly produce declines in oil imports. And so do higher gas prices — which went from an average of less than $2 a gallon at the time Obama took office to nearly $4 in the middle of last year and remain well above $3 today.

How could gasoline demand not drop with so many people out of work, businesses dying and jittery investors sitting on a trillion dollars?

Obama's ad dishonestly suggests he's been engineering an alternative energy economic renaissance in America. As hard-hatted workers are shown assembling solar panels, the ad says, "America's clean energy industry? 2.7 million jobs and expanding rapidly."

It's saying Obama created — or "saved" — 2.7 million new clean energy jobs, right? Uh-uh. Turns out that the Brookings Institution report that the ad cites as its source on the 2.7 million was referring to already-existing green jobs.

You'd never know from the Obama commercial that what Brookings actually said was: "Overall, today's clean economy establishments added half a million jobs between 2003 and 2010, expanding at an annual rate of 3.4 %" — a half-million over eight years being a tiny gain. And that "this performance lagged the growth in the national economy, which grew by 4.2% annually over the period."

You wouldn't know, Brookings said, that "many longer-standing companies in the clean economy — especially those involved in housing- and building-related segments — laid off large numbers of workers during the real estate crash of 2007 and 2008, while sectors unrelated to the clean economy (mainly health care) created many more new jobs nationally."

And Brookings' assessment that the green economy is "expanding rapidly"? Its report's conclusion actually warns "against excessive hopes for large-scale, near-term job-creation from the sector" because "the U.S. clean economy remains small where it is fast-growing and relatively slow-growing on balance ... their status as major employers remains a few years off."

In truth, Obama's energy policy is a disaster as to reducing foreign energy dependence. As the Institute for Energy Research points out, "oil production on federal lands has fallen by 43% over the past nine years, according to the Obama administration's Energy Information Administration. And it has dropped rapidly on President Obama's watch."

Dan Simmons, IER's director of regulatory and state affairs, told IBD he's convinced "President Obama is afraid of charges of crony capitalism regarding Solyndra," the solar panel company that got $535 million in taxpayer-funded stimulus loan funds from the administration, then soon went bankrupt.

That's why the Obama re-election campaign's first big lie is that he is the energy president.

BREAKING NEWS Georgia Judge Denies Obama’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas + VIDEO

Breaking: Georgia Judge Denies Obama’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas


by Sharon Rondeau

Judge Michael Malihi has denied a Motion to Quash Subpoenas submitted by Barack Hussein Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski

(Jan. 20, 2012) — 11:45 a.m., ET – Atty. Orly Taitz informed The Post & Email moments ago that Georgia Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi has denied Obama counsel’s request to quash subpoenas requesting original documentation of Obama’s birth, aliases and social security number application, school records, and other records.

Taitz had written an Opposition to Obama counsel Michael Jablonski’s Motion to Quash the subpoenas she issued as a result of Malihi’s denial of Jablonski’s Motion to Dismiss in the challenge to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to run for president in 2012.

Jablonski had claimed that the hearing scheduled for January 26, 2012 would cause Obama to “interrupt [his] duties as President of the United States” and that the subpoena was, “on its face, unreasonable.”

However, last night (very unpresidentially) Obama publicly sang a solo at The Apollo Theater in New York City.

(Alan note: And spends more time playing golf (including his expensive trips to/from the courses)than administering the country and may have to cancel one of his next golf games!)

The order from Judge Malihi reads, in part:

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced…

On her website, Taitz stated:

I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist and raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.


Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ


Thursday, January 19, 2012


By Mark S. McGrew

Get one thing straight and get it right!

Americans are not revolting against the Federal government and we are not planning a revolution against the Federal Government of The United States of America. Nor promoting any such thing.

The Federal government revolted against us. They are the ones constantly violating our Constitution, from the street punk who calls himself President, right on down to local government employees.

The Federal government has set a tone in this country where they murder us with impunity. Federal and local cops murder unarmed citizens with mace, tasers and guns. And they get away with it, thanks to the help of corrupt higher ups.

They drug our kids, with mind altering "anti-depressants" and all manner of pharmaceuticals and vaccines. They harass and arrest people (for) growing wholesome food. They prohibit citizens from going on "public" lands that have been used for centuries.

They have created enormous amounts of laws to criminalize normal behavior. Over 40,000 laws were passed in the United States of America last year alone.

They invade our homes in the middle of the night with armed psychopaths, to arrest people for minor "crimes": Hint: If they know enough to believe that a criminal is at home sleeping, wouldn't they also know enough to just wait outside until he comes out?

They shoot our dogs, they shoot mentally handicapped people, they shoot physically handicapped people, they shoot our kids, they shoot our mothers and shoot our grand parents, when there is no apparent threat to their own safety.

Without mercy, they beat those same people to the ground and hospitalize them or beat them to death when there is no apparent threat to their own safety. They do it for fun and laugh about it afterwards.

There are cops on permanent duty in schools, arresting kids on criminal charges, for things as non-threatening as using perfume in class or farting in class. Rather than call the parents for a misbehaving child in a school for problem children, they arrest them, mace them, taser them and even shoot them.

They rape, they kill, they deal in drugs, they steal, they frame people for fictitious crimes and get away with it. They even rape other men.

They stop people on public roadways, for no apparent reason, search the passengers and the car and when they find cash, they confiscate it, with no charges being filed. They intercept drug dealers and make deals with them: "Give us the cash and you can walk away from here."

They have run guns to Mexico and other countries in order to make a case for gun control in America. Approximately 50,000 people have been murdered in Mexico in the past 6 years that we know about. Based on the proven facts that mass graves are occasionally found and the well known fact that the Mexican government lies, that figure in all likelihood could be twice as high.

In the first nine months of 2011, an average of one person was murdered every 30 minutes.

Over 2,000 guns have been sold to criminals in America, under the permission and direction of the American Federal government, knowing they were being taken to Mexican drug cartels. Based on the fact that Attorney General Eric Holder and his government agents have been consistently lying and withholding evidence of this international gun running operation, that figure may be 10 times higher. They have also been caught selling illegal guns to gang members inside America to be used inside America.

It would be difficult to find one line of text in our Constitution that they have not violated. It would be difficult to name one of the 50 States where they have not murdered, robbed, framed, imprisoned or sexually raped its citizens.

Don't believe any of this? Go to  or  and type in the phrases: Cops murder, cops kill, cops rape, cops deal drugs, etc.

No, the American people have no plans for a revolution.

It is crystal clear that the Federal government has committed a revolution against us and the entire World.

How do we stop this ongoing revolution? How do we stop these  (Federal - Obama) people who are committing a violent overthrow of our government?

As in France during World War II, there is in fact an American Resistance and an American Underground. We are everywhere. We have more people and we have more guns than do the traitors. Does anyone think that they are not afraid of us?

Then why else do they secretly hurry through a Federal law to pick up and imprison any American citizen without charges, without trial, without legal counsel, without evidence and put them under military dominance in a secret location?

Why else would they be trying to pass another Federal law that strips the citizenship away from anyone who opposes their ongoing criminal behavior?

A 14 minute video explains it here:

There is one group of people, one authority that has privilege above and beyond the Federal government, that has the authority and the power to obstruct, detain and arrest Federal employees, including FBI, DEA, BATF, IRS, Federal Judges, politicians and anyone else who is an employee of the American people. It's a no brainer. So simple that it was right in front of our noses and we didn't even see it.

In 1773, a group of people boarded some ships in Boston Harbor and tossed over the cargo, to protest unjust taxes. That "Boston Tea Party" started a firestorm of aggression against the British Empire. In 1775, the American people went to war against the British. In 1776, we declared our Independence as a free Nation. In 1787, out Constitution was written by some of the most brilliant men in the history of humanity. They knew government has a quest to be tyrannical. They knew government would use force to enslave its citizens. They knew government was corrupt.

They knew that government was not the answer to the world's ills. Government is the problem. They decided to let men govern themselves.

"We the People" of America are the government of this Country.

The people of the previous British colonies formed individual free States.

Those States later formed a national government with strict and defined limits on what they could or could not do. The Federal government did not form us. We formed it. No different than a man and a woman who create a child, "We the People" created the Federal government.

Does it make any sense to anyone that a five year old child tells his parents how to live, what to eat, where they can or cannot go? What they can or cannot do? Does it make more sense that a 15 year old child can tell his parents how to live? Does a 40 year old son tell his parents what they can or cannot read?

We created the Federal government. We the People are the parent. And it appears as if the child needs to be taken out to the wood shed and given a severe beating with Dad's leather belt.

We the People created something to protect us against a Federal government gone wild.

That something is called a County Sheriff. A County Sheriff can tell Federal agents to get out of town before sun down.

A Sheriff can tell armed Federal agents to leave their guns at the saloon.

A Sheriff can arrest Federal agents and the only thing that agent can do is shut up or draw his pistol.

That is just the way it is.

Federal employees are just beginning to learn that little inconvenient truth of American life.

On January 29, 30 and the 31st of 2012, there will be a Constitutional Sheriffs Convention of over 100 sheriffs from across America, learning what they can do to stop the unconstitutional and criminal behavior of Federal employees in their State.

They will be hearing stories from various Sheriffs who have actually confronted the Federal employees and won. Information regarding this convention can be found at:

With the assistance of Constitutional scholar, Mr. Gerald Donaldson of  Sheriff Richard Mack at  organized this historic event.

Future conventions will focus on "Training the Trainers" to instruct citizens to go back to their States and educate their County Sheriffs on how to stop the Feds (from behaving illegally).

Further plans are to form citizen Grand Juries as granted by the US Constitution, to indict corrupt local government employees and have their constitutional minded Sheriff enforce those indictments.

County Sheriffs have stopped the federal agents from abusing their citizens. Here are a few examples.

December 18, 2011 Elkhart County sheriff intervenes against feds in raw milk case.

November 22, 2011 New Mexico Sheriffs Standing Tall by Larry Pratt.

October 28, 2011 8 minute YouTube video of several Sheriffs telling their stories.

August 3, 2011 15 minute YouTube video of Infowars Special Report With Sheriff Richard Mack, the Sheriff who challenged the Brady Bill all the way to the Supreme Court and won a landmark victory for state sovereignty and founder of the Las Vegas Constitutional Sheriff's Convention.

July 2, 2011 Oregon Sheriff stands up against the US Forest Service by Sarah Foster.

May 5, 2011 Letter from Oregon Sheriff, Gil Gilbertson, telling the US Forest Service that he has the authority, not them.

May 31, 2011 Letter from Grant County, Oregon Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer telling the US Forest Service that he is the authorized law enforcement in his county and that their only jurisdiction is limited to their own federal building.

July 30, 2010 Nye County, Nevada Sheriff, Tony Demeo, was told that the BLM federal agents intended to arrest Sheriff DeMeo and use armed force to take a citizen's cattle.

Sheriff DeMeo advised the federal agent that their SWAT team would be faced with Sheriff DeMeo's SWAT team if they proceeded.

The Feds stopped illegally harassing the cattle rancher and did not arrest Sheriff DeMeo, to this day.

March 23, 2010 Audio of Bill Meyers radio show about constitutional classes for Sheriffs.

Go to  to read about those cases.

These Sheriffs hold that the Federal government has no authority or jurisdiction over their citizens as per United States Codes 40 USC 255 and 50 USC 175 amended to 40 USC 3111 and 3112.

Accordingly, the United States Supreme Court has ruled many times that the Federal government has no right to tell individual States what to do.

One Supreme Court Justice, wrote, "States are not puppets to a ventriloquist Congress".

Is the Federal government of the United States of America so insane, so drunk with power, so out of touch with reality that they would actually gun down constitutionally authorized peace officers protecting the Constitutional Rights of citizens?

I think they are.

(Alan note: based on his actions and new policies, so does Obama!)

We have a supposed President who time after time, either ignores our Constitution or intentionally violates it with impunity and scorn.

A willing Congress (with a co-conspiratorial Democrat majority) follows his lead

The US Attorney General flaunts his illegal gun running business.

Federal employees brag about it.

State Governors pretend there is nothing they can do.

What Attorney General of any of the 50 States has made any statement objecting to the ongoing criminal actions of the Federal employees?

The men and women who will be attending the Sheriffs Convention are prepared to call the Fed's bluff and put their lives and careers on the line. And with each success story, more will fill their ranks.

Some States are already trying to eliminate their Sheriff departments. So what?

The people of those States can just elect someone else to enforce our Constitutional Rights. Call that position anything you want, but all powers are granted to the people, not the elected or appointed Federal and State employees.

The Federal government has to be taught that their charade is over.

Their Alice in Wonderland lifestyle is not going to continue forever. In their drug addled brains, they think it will. Let them think that. I'm sure Hitler was a bit surprised too, when we came for him. We know Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi were more than a little surprised. I guess these gangsters will be too.

We the People have to stand with these Sheriffs. We need to stand with them physically, as armed volunteer deputies. Let the Obama Feds fire the first shots. Let them show the World what they really are: An out of control gangster government. And to the World, I will say quite clearly, "If they will do it to us, they will do it to you".

On September 23, 1779, Captain John Paul Jones, of the American colony's Continental Navy, when asked by the British Captain he was doing battle with, if he would surrender, is quoted as saying, "I have not yet begun to fight!" That may not be entirely correct.

Historians believe that what he actually said was, ""Ay, ay, we'll do that, when we can fight no longer, but we shall see yours come down first! For you must know, that Yankees do not haul down their colors until they are fairly beaten!"

And that is the position that, We the People, are in, once again.

Mark S. McGrew can be reached at . More of his articles, published on over 500 websites, in 28 countries, in 8 languages, are on . When reprinting this article, please include a link to the free press of Pravda.Ru


Take a look also at other videos offered after this one finishes.

Monday, January 16, 2012


The new Miss Kentucky

This picture that will haunt her for the rest of her life:

Make-up and hair style .................. $500

New dress for the show ..................$700

Giant stuffed bear ................... $300

Not knowing how to hold the bear with a microphone in her hand



You do not have to be black to fit into the MLK philosophy.

Sunday, January 15, 2012


Farsi article in our Multilingual section quotes a couple of names like Golpayegani and Kharrazi. They have apparently paid small fortunes to local attorneys to get them temporary visas to enter and then gradually change these to permanent visas leading to Green cards. Again reportedly for themselves and family members.

Rats abandoning a sinking ship, their brutal Supreme leader has helped them sink?

Without the shameful fortunes they have stolen from a suffering, increasingly destitute Iranian people they would be just another bunch of big time loser thugs. A category into which, without the local bloodshed (as yet), our pro-Mullah, pro-Sharia, pro-Moslem Brotherhood copycat thug Obama fits comfortably.

He has the blood of MANY tens of thousands of victims of his actions shed in Tunisia, Yemen, Egypt, Libya and Syria. And to an extent Afghanistan, where his restrictive rules of engagement cost many more Americans their lives than necessary.

AND also Iraq, where his tone-deaf, mindless, self-serving withdrawal is still killing Iraqis as they try to find their place in the chaos he has left behind.



Only about 90 million out of an eligible 200 million vote and only a few of those can recognize photos of candidates for President! After three years of intense self-saturation on TV, Obama has face recognition but for most of those not happy with him they have NO clue of whom else to select.

Enter the Unions with over half a million of them exempted from Obamacare costs to keep them on his side, the multitude of  Chicago style thugs and Occupy America anarchist groups, the ACORNs, the Freeloaders who benefit from Obama policies, the Islamists who gloat as he destroys America, as do Iran, Syria and (like him)  power hungry/grabbing enemies like the Moslem Brotherhood. They all fawn and laud him as a great leader, which he politically and  narcissistically believes himself to be anyway, without any on their help.

Thus this mass of basically "politically illiterate/ignorant" cannon fodder to the insidious groups above and others for them and provides Valerie Jarette with the confidence that no matter what she and Obama do, they can get away with it.

In the face of the naive, easily fooled, credulous, increasingly poorly or mis-educated and persuadable voters, who will swallow the disinformation Obama and his czars or minions FORCE feed them like the geese to make foie gras, which makes their livers ill but is a delicacy for the better off, sickens our nation.  Most readers here know what  "foie gras" is but survey the average American and on a par with politics,  they have no clue what this is.

In surveys of voters, they think the LARGEST expense in our national budget is....? FOREIGN AID! In fact, though poorly used/distributed, this is less than ONE percent of our budget. (If and when the Senate Democrats present one), which they have not done in nearly three YEARS.

If they refuse to pass a budget then HIDDEN slush funds built into ObamaCare and passed (forced through without reading) by them, when they had control of both the Senate and Congress for two years and the White House, can be used to promote RADICAL, anti-American Obama activities.

With this as the re-election playing field, despite the utter disaster Obama has proved to be not just for the USA but around the world, he might be able to force a re-election win for himself.          

As in Iran in 1978/79, the populace (as in America) was too greedy and too inexperienced to prevent a take over by the bloodthirsty, no-Persian blood from father or mother, invader called Khomeini. The ayatollah promised free gas, electricity, free water, free housing and a share in the oil revenues of the country. Nobody in Iran had the experience or numbers  to calculate that the the TOTAL budget of the world would NOT suffice to implement all this inside Iran!

Free (not so at all) health care and many other benefits to cronies and to welfare families from Obama served a similar false promise to entice supporters.

AND with his recent request a $6.2 TRILLION increase in our debt IN ONE TERM and a hurtle to total bankruptcy of our NATION not just those who are now out of work.

He uses  taxpayer money and money he borrows from other countries to bribe/induce the masses to vote for him.

If  you vote for him again, after the disastrous results of his administration "ass-ministration", then you deserve to reap what you are sowing! And it will NOT be pleasant.

The description of the Valerie role so far also provides a look into the total role of Obama in disaster after disaster, IDIOTICALLY (from any business point of view)  throwing away BILLIONS of YOUR  money to his cronies and supporters, (and Valerie's) which has all gone down the drain and her role and his refusal to use common sense are a harbinger of even worse results when he does not have to worry about re-election and has four years to complete his removal of the USA as a Christian nation and world power.

The ONLY real silver lining is that money allocating Congress is in non-Obama hands and the Senate may also slip from his grasp. He is already threatening to disregard our Constitution and implement his plans by by-passing Congress and Senate by Executive Order and ruling the USA like a King.

Another salvation is that a Judge has finally challenged his eligibility to be on the ballot in Georgia and if found lacking, other States will certainly follow suit and the Obama threat to America will be removed. Depending on who is elected, it may only be reduced rather than obviated.




If for nothing else, Jodi Kantor’s The Obamas will be remembered for an anecdote from 2010. After he spent hours disputing an allegation in the French media that Michelle Obama thought life in the White House was “hell,” press secretary Robert Gibbs encountered senior adviser Valerie Jarrett. She told him the first lady was unhappy with his work. Gibbs exploded in a rage, informing Jarrett that she didn’t “know what the f— you’re talking about” and that if Mrs. Obama was displeased, well, “f— her too.” Subsequent relations between the senior adviser and press secretary were strained. Gibbs told Kantor he stopped taking Jarrett seriously “as an adviser to the president of the United States.”

It’s about time. Many have wondered—and the Washington Post asked last year—“What, exactly, does Valerie Jarrett do?” No one has a clear answer. Whatever she does, the U.S. taxpayer pays her $172,200 a year to do it. A confidante of the Obamas for more than two decades, variously described as the president’s “closest adviser” and a member of the “innermost ring” of influence, Jarrett clearly has the first couple’s ears. She seems to function as a sort of third party to the Obama marriage, guarding the president and his wife from bad news and outside influence while meeting with Lady Gaga. Her lack of any national political experience whatsoever—she had never been to Iowa before Obama competed there three years ago—has not prevented her from shaping the White House’s political strategy and influencing economic and foreign policies. One might liken her to Don Corleone’s consigliere Tom Hagen, bedecked in a designer shawl, except Hagen gave better advice.

What Valerie Jarrett does best is represent the Obama administration in microcosm. She embodies its insularity, its cronyism, its cluelessness.

Born in Iran to a prominent African-American family from Chicago, she took degrees at Stanford and Michigan Law. She worked briefly as a corporate lawyer but hated every moment. So she decided to “give back,” which is Chicago code for cashing in. She campaigned for Harold Washington, Chicago’s first black mayor, and worked for him in the corporation counsel’s office. Washington died in 1987, but Jarrett remained in government, working for his successor, Mayor Richard M. “Richie” Daley, son of legendary boss Richard J. Daley. It was all upward from there.

Before long Jarrett stood at the intersection of private interest and public power. She became Daley’s deputy chief of staff and was later appointed to various boards and quasi-governmental agencies that award lucrative contracts—the Chicago Transit Board, the Commission for Planning and Development for the City of Chicago, the University of Chicago Medical Center, and so on. Her social standing, combined with her positions in government and her well-compensated seats on the boards of many companies, magnified Jarrett’s power. She knew everybody. Everybody wanted to know her.

In 1991, another disillusioned attorney, Michelle Robinson, applied for a job in Mayor Daley’s office. Jarrett interviewed her. The two women were instant friends. Before accepting the position, however, Robinson made an unusual request: Would Jarrett mind having dinner with her and her fiancé, Barack Obama? Jarrett accepted, and she has never been far from the couple since.

President Obama, who grew up partly in Indonesia, seems to be drawn to Americans who have spent considerable time abroad, who feel askew in their native land. Jarrett told author David Remnick that the reason she bonded with Barack Obama was that “he and I shared a view of where the United States fit in the world, which is often different from the view people have who have not traveled outside the United States as young children.” Remnick goes on to write that Jarrett viewed America “as one country among many, rather than as the center of all wisdom and experience.” Sounds like the president, all right.

Jarrett was an early supporter of Obama’s political career. From her post at the nexus of Chicago business and politics, she was helpful in introducing the ambitious state senator to rich and well-connected figures. The association was not without embarrassment, however. Jarrett was an occasional collaborator with the developer Antoin Rezko, whose 2006 arrest for public corruption became a shallow pothole in Obama’s road to the White House. And Jarrett herself provided some bad headlines: In addition to her public burdens, she ran Habitat Co., which received taxpayer subsidies to manage low-income housing projects seemingly into the ground. The feds seized one complex in 2006; another, Grove Parc Plaza, was exposed as a decrepit slum by the Boston Globe in 2008.

The Chicago method was on full display after Obama defeated John McCain, when functionaries from across the state of Illinois lobbied for the president-elect’s now vacant Senate seat. Evidence released at the trial of former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich reveals that Jarrett, who has never been elected to anything, wanted to replace her protégé in the Senate. This was something incoming chief of staff Rahm Emanuel was only too happy to make happen, since he had no desire for Jarrett to join the Obamas at the White House. But the president-elect overruled both advisers. He wanted Jarrett by his side. Later she became mistrustful of Emanuel when she learned that he had tried to sideline her.

The feeling was mutual. One of Obama’s more flowery hagiographers, journalist Richard Wolffe, divides the administration into “revivalists,” who want the president to be true to the spirit of hope and change, and “survivalists,” who believe compromise is necessary in a divided country. Jarrett is the leader of the revivalists, and her fingerprints are on every blunder and boo-boo the White House has ever made.

She bragged to a conference of leftwing bloggers that she had hired noted environmentalist and 9/11 Truther Van Jones, later forced to resign. She campaigned extensively for Obama to travel to Copenhagen and make the case for holding the 2016 summer games in Chicago before the International Olympic Committee. Obama took the trip; the IOC chose Rio.

During this time Jarrett met with George Kaiser, the Obama bundler and investor whose solar-panel manufacturer Solyndra was up for a huge loan guarantee. Jarrett, according to government documents, was warned about Solyndra’s shaky finances on the eve of the president’s visit to the company’s facility in Fremont, California. Obama went anyway.

One could be forgiven for thinking that the president tends to side with the revivalists because they feed his ego. Jarrett’s descriptions of Obama are adoring. “I knew the unique combination of leadership qualities that Barack has would push him to greatness,” she told Richard Wolffe. “They always have. Barack has this kind of a—what’s the way to describe it?—restless spirit.” Obama, she told Remnick, has “been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do. He would never be satisfied with what other people do.” Fed a constant diet of words like these, is it any wonder Obama decided to press on with his health care overhaul after Scott Brown won in Massachusetts, refused any meaningful compromise with Republicans during last summer’s debt ceiling fight, and insisted on giving one “major” address after another even though they have done nothing to advance his agenda or salvage his underwater approval rating?

The House is lost, Obama’s reelection looks dicey, but Jarrett is flying high. In one sense she is the most successful Obama courtier of them all: She has outlasted her rivals. Gibbs is gone. Internal clashes led to Emanuel’s sudden discovery that he had always wanted to be mayor of Chicago. Emanuel’s replacement, fellow Chicagoan Bill Daley (brother of Richie), was muscled out last week; word is he fought with Jarrett too. Her persistence is matched only by her tone-deafness. Wolffe describes the president’s first visit to Chicago after his inauguration. From the window of his helicopter Obama could see that his arrival had caused a major traffic jam. “We shouldn’t have come here in rush hour,” he reflected. This was too much for Jarrett. “You know what, Mr. President?” she said. “You may not be enjoying your new life, but I am.”

Better enjoy it while it lasts—which won’t be for long if Obama continues to listen to his inept political fixer.