Monday, June 09, 2008

IS THIS HILLARY'S OCTOBER SURPRISE ?

IS THIS KNOWLEDGE WHAT HAS KEPT HILLLARY SO UPBEAT AFTER "LOSING"? DOES SHE FEEL SHE CAN PROVE THAT OBAMA DOES NOT QUALIFY TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT ACCORDING TO U.S. LAW IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH?

Also VIEW video at the end of this article for a good look at Obama's background. Cannot say I prefer Hillary Clinton AND find both equally dangerous for the well being of the USA.



Obama may hold dual citizenship of the US and Kenya(?)

“The American people, when deciding whom to support for president, have a right to know if their ‘president’ is also a citizen of Kenya and owes dual loyalty to Kenya because he has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship
poorboy's blog

CAN OBAMA BE PRESIDENT?

Submitted by poorboy on June 6, 2008 - 8:48pm.

Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between "December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? .

Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal.

US Law very clearly stipulates: "…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16."

Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16.

It doesn’t matter *after* .

In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship.

At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18 in Hawai’i.

His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen.

As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent.

Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.


*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. ***

Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16.

Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia.

Now you can see why Obama’s aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery.

This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law.

I think the Gov. Of California would be very insterested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence.

Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days…

Alan note: reports reaching us indicated that Obama was ACTUALLY born in Kenya because the airlines would not allow his pregnant mothre to fly at her late stage of pregnancy.

After she gave birth to him in Kenya, she immediately boarded a flight to Hawaai and then "registered" his birth as having taken place in Hawaii.

In depth VIDEO of Obama

Sunday, June 08, 2008

57 STATES OF ISLAM AND EUROPEAN DHIMMITUDE

Obama-nosis You must read this ScaryFrom Rush Limbaugh's radio show yesterday..... Hey, folks, you want to tweak the Drive-By Media with me right now? You are aware, probably, that Barack Obama lost his bearings recently and said that he was going to campaign in all 57 states. You heard this? And everybody chalked it up to, "Well, he's tired." You know, this is a Dan Quayle moment. I mean, Dan Quayle goes out there and misspells "potato," and we still hear jokes about it. Barack Obama says he's gonna go out and campaign in 57 states, The liberals say: "He was just tired, you know, it's been such a long campaign, he's been so many places, he probably thinks there are 57 states." Well, I have here a printout from a website called the International Humanist and Ethical Union. And here is how the second paragraph of an article on that website begins. "Every year from 1999 to 2005 the organization of the Islamic conference representing the 57 Islamic states presented a resolution to the United Nations Commission on human rights called combating." Obama said he's going to campaign in 57 states, and it turns out that there are 57 Islamic states. There are 57 Islamic states. "Every year from 1999 to 2005, the organization of the Islamic conference representing the 57 Islamic states, " this is from the International Humanist and Ethical Union. And the title of the piece here is, "How the Islamic states dominate the UN human rights council," and there are 57 of them. So did Obama just lose his bearings, or was this a more telling slip, ladies and gentlemen? ------------------------------------------- (Now you try to tell me that Obama doesn't have Muslim issues!) -------------------------------------------------- ALSO READ THIS AND USE LINK AT END TO VIEW THE ARTICLE THAT TRIGGERED THIS Civilized Kafir 870 Decent Town Drive Anystate, CA 20101, USA June 8, 2008 Daily Times 41-N, Industrial AreaGulberg II, LahorePakistan Subject: Letter to Editor To Whom It May Concern: The Sunday, June 8, 2008 article by Tahir Niaz, entitled “Pakistan to ask EU to amend laws on freedom of expression” is indicative of the awesome lack of tolerance, willful ignorance, and hatred of Islam for those of the civilized world who enjoy and appreciate our freedoms of expression. While various and sundry Imams and other propagandist mouthpieces of Islam can spew whatever hatred, lies, and takiyyah they wish in our often all too tolerant western civilized societies, the closed, narrow minded retrograde Islamists and stealth jihadists cannot tolerate any criticism of Mohammed. And now, a batch of your finest examples of retrogression are going forth to preach to civilized people the need to be dhimmis. Bullshit! Let me help you all to understand part of the new ways of thinking, and define better some of the outdated Islamist terms. Kafir has a new meaning – “civilized”, and I am proud to be a genuine civilized man, a Kafir, a real man, not a dhimmi useful fool Thus, whenever one of your finest people who preach hatred and subjugation while wearing rags on their little pinheads come near me, I enjoy expressing my GOD given blessed freedoms in telling them to go and join their Mohammed in Allahland – hell. ALAN NOTE: The delegation, headed by an additional secretary of the Interior Ministry, will meet the leaders of the EU countries in a bid to convince them that the recent attack on the Danish Embassy in Pakistan could be a reaction against the blasphemous campaign, sources said. They said that the delegation would also tell the EU that if such acts against Islam are not controlled, more attacks on the EU diplomatic missions abroad could not be ruled out. In other words, do what we want, or we'll kill you. Pakistan to ask EU to amend laws on freedom of expression CLICK HERE

OBAMA'S "WHITE FOLKS" VIEWS AND LIST OF HIS SUPPORTERS

IN HIS OWN VOICE FROM HIS OWN BOOK
(List of Supporters below the Video)

OBAMA'S SUPPORTERS READ LIKE A LIST OF WHO'S WHO AMONG RACISTS, THUGS, MUSLIMS, MARXIST AND AMERICAN HATERS OF THE WORLD.

* William Ayers (Weatherman Underground bomber, unrepentant domestic terrorist)

* Frank Davis (Member Communist Party USA, Early mentor to Obama)

* Jeremiah Wright (Black Liberation militant, racist, and Pastor)

* Tony Rezko (Corrupt Financier, ties to Terror Financing)

* Louis Farrakhan (Nation of Islam Leader, racist, anti-American)

* RailaOrdinga (Fundamental Islamic Candidate, Kenya, Obama’s Cousin)

* Daniel Ortega (Marxist Sandinista Leader. Nicarauga)

* Raul Castro (Hard-line Communist Leader, Cuba)

* Communist Party Illinois, (US Communist Political Party)

* Socialist Party USA, (Marxist Socialist Political Party)

* The New Black Panther Party, (Black Militant Organization, anti-American and racist)

* Hamas Terrorist Organization, (Islamic Terrorist Organisation)

* More than 80 attorneys for Guantanamo detainees -who have been offering free-of-charge legal services. Not surprising that lawyers for Muslim terrorists would support Obama.

* The Communist Party USA

* The Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism

* Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim congressman

* Sam Graham-Felsen, (Obama campaign’s official blogger) He spent time in France taking part in labor riots, has written for a socialist magazine, hung a communist flag in his home, and was a fan of Marx while at Harvard.

* Kwame Kilpatrick

* MoveOn.org George Soros’ (slumlord undergoing trial) son, Jonathan Soros, an attorney and financier, recently promoted to deputy manager of Soros Fund Management , is personally involved with MoveOn.org’s activities.

* Muslim Americans for Obama ‘08

* The Muslim American Society

* Obama Supporters for Marijuana Law Reform

* Obama Youth, “Obama Youth” had as its logo the Islamic crescent and stars (until word got out on the net and they had to clean it up)

* President Daniel Ortega ..who statee, “It’s not to say that there is already a revolution under way in the U.S. ... but yes, they are laying the foundations for a revolutionary change.”

* Project Islamic H. O. P. E., ..who displayed Obama as their banner boy until word got out and they had to clean that up. Obama is no longer there on the site.

* Rev. Al Sharpton ..obviously supports Obama, but obviously advised to keep it quiet.

* Shepard Fairey, Official artist of the Obama posters...remarkable resemblance to Marxist posters

* Tony Rezko, Obama said that he estimated Rezko raised about 50,000 to 60,000 for his political career. Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle.

* Malaak Shabazz Daughter of Malcomb X

* The Socialist Party USA

* George Soros billionaire - Jew haterThey all support, endorse, and/or friends and mentors and advisors of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.

* They all hate America, they all want to destroy America as we know it.

They all want the United States to retreat in the war on terror, and they all want to make over the United States into a marxist/socialist/collective nation Obama’s own core ideology/theology, coincides with these people.

This says all you need to know about Obama.. You can and should judge a man by the company he keeps.

Maybe this explains Obama hands were over his crotch instead of saluting the flag/anthem and refusing to wear the flag pin- claiming to do so was ‘false patriotism’

Saturday, June 07, 2008

AMERICA'S NEW FIRST FAMILY

Luo dancers from the Senator Barack Obama Primary School


***************************************************************************

Barack Obama's grandmother, Sarah Hussein Onyango Obama




******************************************************************

U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama's uncle has been a prisoner in his own home, trapped by post election violence that has left more than 600 Kenyans dead. 'If Barack Obama were elected, he would improve relations between Africa and America because he had his roots in Africa', his uncle said.

Alan comment: please note the painting, whose corner touches the uncle's head. This kind of portrait looks like those usually found in Iran and not so often of Arabic style because of the full face and chest exposure. Could be Obama's mother?

********************************************************************

Malik Obama, older brother to Barack Obama, holds an undated picture of Barak, left, and himself, middle, and an unidentified friend in his shop in eastern Kenya.


***************************************************************************

Barack has stated his support for Luo aila Odinga
(Opposition Leader in Kenya who signed a 'Shariah pact with Muslims and claims to be Obama's cousin) and is married to Ida Odinga. They have four children - two sons and two daughters. His oldest son, Fidel, is named after Fidel Castro.





*******************************************************************

Barack's father, Muslim, but reportedly a hard-drinker, was married three times, attended Harvard and returned to Kenya. Obama claims he was an atheist, but he was raised Muslim and was given a Muslim burial at Barack's family's request.


His father with his mother Stanley Ann Dunham.


In his own autobiography Obama writes, 'How and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I have never quite had the courage to explore.' (His father was apparently still married to his first wife Kezia in Kenya at the time.)

With mother Stanley Ann Dunham.


With father during his father's only visit while Obama was in Hawaii

********************************************************************

Mother's 2nd husband Lolo Soetoro (Indonesian Muslim), their daughter Maya, and Obama.



********************************************************************

Apparently abandoned by his father and shipped off by his mother to his white grandparents, Barry Sotero becomes Barack Hussein Obama. Obama would describe his grandparents as 'white folk.' ('white folk' that would NOT abandon their grandchild).



********************************************************************

Obama's visit to Africa '06 Campaigning for Odinga. Are there transcripts of his speeches?


***************************************************************************
Barack stands behind Kezia (stepmother) in a Kenyan family shot. (Including brother Abongo 'Roy' Obama who is a Luo activist and a 'Militant Muslim' who argues that the black man must 'liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture.' )

Abongo's new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed, and at the wedding, he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father,' Obama wrote in Dreams From My Father.


Thursday, June 05, 2008

REVERSE COLONIZATION TURNING EUROPE INTO ISLAMIC CALIPHATE

UPDATE: READ THE INTERESTING NEW COMMENT / ADD-ON BY EVIL-ISLAM TO THIS ARTICLE. HOWEVER, HIS OPINION OF DR. FOULADVAND IS NOT SHARED BY ANTIMULLAH, WHICH HAS LOTS OF CONFLICTING INFORMATION ABOUT DR. FOULADVAND AND NEITHER CONDEMNS NOR AGREES WITH HIM. "Evil-Islam" occasionaly posts a comment on Anti Mullah, some of which are worth a special focus, as we are doing here. He prefaces references his reply to the way Islam took over Iran despite the Shah's warnings and now is colonizing the EU: WAKE UP AMERICA - THIS CULTURAL 'TAINT' HAS ALREADY PERMEATED THE USA. ACT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE AND OUR DHIMMIS GOVERN US ACCORDING TO ORDERS FROM MOSLEM IMAMS IN OUR MOSQUES. JUST AS KHOMEINI TOOK OVER IRAN VIA THE NETWORK OF MOSQUES. evilislam said... This is what The SHAH of IRAN was trying to make The Stupid West understand :
The Execution of Britain
From the desk of Fjordman on Thu, 2008-06-05 12:14 I will defend all Western and indeed infidel countries against Islamic Jihad, but I admit I feel especially close to Britain, not just because of the long cultural and historic ties between Scandinavia and the British Isles, but also because I appreciate the good that has come out of British culture. It makes me all the more sad to see how humiliated this great nation is today, and how many natives feel forced to leave what once was their country. England: In May 2008, 18 year-old Ben Smith was stopped in a routine check. The police officer noticed an English flag on the parcel shelf and ordered him to remove it because it was "racist towards immigrants." One of the first things foreign powers usually do when they invade a country is to ban its national symbols. The fact that you can no longer run your flag in parts of Britain – and the Netherlands, Sweden, France, etc. – shows that the country is de facto under occupation, not just by Muslims, but by Multiculturalists and Globalists of all kinds. In an essay entitled "Put away the flags", Howard Zinn, the Leftist author of the best-selling book A People's History of the United States, writes that "On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed. Is not nationalism – that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder – one of the great evils of our time, along with racism, along with religious hatred?" He concludes that "We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation. "The problem is, rights can only be protected by sovereign states upholding their territorial integrity. How is "the global community" or "the human race" going to protect Mr. Zinn's liberties? For a free society to function, the state has to pass laws in the best interest of its citizenry and enforce these within its territory. Otherwise, self-government is impossible. In order to defend this territory from outside aggression, people need to identify with it as something more than just a random space on a map. By removing sovereign states, you remove the very foundations of a free society. Maybe some groups actually desire this? The British Foreign Minister Milliband stated late in 2007 that the European Union should expand to include Muslim nations in North Africa and the Middle East. The French President Sarkozy and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed this early in 2008. Since the EU involves the free movement of people across borders, European leaders are thus opening the floodgates to tens of millions of Muslims at a time when native Europeans already feel like aliens in their own cities. It's the greatest betrayal in the history of Western civilization and it has been planned for many years, as those who have read Bat Ye'or's writings about Eurabia will know. I believe native Europeans should seriously consider creating a European Indigenous People's Movement to protect our interests. Our authorities currently reward those who use violence and punish those who don't. Native Europeans are ignored if we protest peacefully against mass immigration or the expanding pan-European superstate. Muslims get concessions while we are treated with increasing hostility from those who are supposed to be our leaders. Muslims in Jordan, a country that takes part in the Barcelona process of "Euro-Mediterranean cooperation" and thus a likely future EU member, recently sued the Danish cartoonists who drew Muhammad for "blasphemy" against Islam, a "crime" that potentially carries the death penalty according to sharia law. Not too many years into the future, we could face a situation where citizens of, say, Denmark could be arrested by their own authorities and handed over to be tried for "crimes against Islam" in one of the Arab "partner countries" of the EU. If this sounds unthinkable to you, look at the case of the Dutch cartoonist who was recently arrested by a dozen police officers for the crime of publishing cartoons insulting immigrants. PM Tony Blair expressed "profound relief" over the end of a hostage crisis in 2007 where British soldiers had been kidnapped by the Islamic Republic of Iran, telling the mullahs that "we bear you no ill will." Blair will be remembered as one of the worst leaders in history. Even Chamberlain didn't flood his country with enemies and present this as something positive. Mass immigration has been going on for decades but showed a spectacular increase under Blair's and Brown's Labour regime. The spike was so powerful that it is tempting to speculate whether the authorities had deliberately set out to dismantle their own nation. According to newspaper columnist Leo McKinstry, the English are being turned into second-class citizens in their own country: "England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population. "Similar things are happening all over the Western world, not just in England or Britain, but Britain is definitely one of the worst countries, yes. I've been debating with people which country is most likely to get the first Eurabian civil war triggered by mass immigration. There are several possible candidates, but my money is on Britain, because the anger among ordinary citizens is only rivaled by the brutal political repression tactics.In a survey published in April 2008, one in three medical doctors in Britain said that elderly patients should not be given free treatment if it were unlikely to do them good for long. At the same time, Muslim men with multiple wives have been given the go-ahead to claim extra welfare benefits. The "welfare state" now means that the natives should watch grandma die because she's getting old anyway and we need the money to pay Muslims with multiple wives and numerous children so that they can feel comfortable while colonizing the country. Also in April 2008, David T, a stunned dad and his little boy, were banned from swimming at a popular public sports center in east London because this was a "Muslim men-only swimming" session. Several Christian priests have been physically attacked by Muslims in east London, leading one bishop to worry about "no-go-zones" for Christian in some parts of the country. In early June, a Muslim police community support officer ordered Christian preachers to stop handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. They were threatened with arrest for committing a "hate crime" and were told they risked being beaten up if they returned. In March 2008, two Islamic terrorists were moved to different prisons after complaining that their fellow inmates were "too white." Dhiren Barot had masterminded a radioactive bomb plot involving limousines packed with nails and explosives and Omar Khyam plotted to blow up the Bluewater shopping centre in Kent. How do native Brits react to this? Well, some get angry, as they should. Bryan Cork, 49, was jailed for six months for "racist slurs" after he had shouted insults at Muslim worshippers outside a Cumbria mosque, including "proud to be British" and "go back to where you came from." This was after the London Jihadist bombings in 2005. Judge Paul Batty told him that racism in any form would not be tolerated. I hear much talk about "national suicide" these days, but Mr. Cork apparently had no desire to commit national suicide, he was held down by his own authorities for refusing to accept the organized destruction of his nation. What we are dealing with here isn't suicide; it's an execution of an entire nation, perhaps an entire civilization, the greatest civilization ever created by man. Even children face this kind of ideological intimidation. Codie Stott, a teenage British schoolgirl, was forced to spend hours in a police cell after she was reported by her teachers for "racism." She had objected, in the mildest possible terms, to being placed during class with a group of South Asian immigrants who talked among themselves in a language she didn't understand. For this, she was dragged to the local police station and had her fingerprints and photograph taken. 18-year-old Jamie who has Down's syndrome and the mental age of a five-year-old was charged with "racism" after an argument with an immigrant. Meanwhile, the UK is being brought to its knees in an epidemic of violent crime and white native girls get raped by immigrants in spectacular numbers, just like all over Western Europe. Why do people still take this lying down? I wonder about that sometimes. Maybe they feel that their votes don't matter and have resigned into a state of quiet apathy. Since many are dependent upon government support and being branded a "bigot" could cause you to lose your livelihood, people still have too much to lose by openly opposing these policies. Such subtle blackmail can be quite effective in suppressing dissent. This could, however, change rapidly in the event of a serious economic downturn. Another crucial element is confusion. People are deliberately kept in the dark by the media and the authorities regarding the full scale of what they are facing. Combined with Muslim violence and intimidation of critics, we have a climate of fear and confusion. People who are scared and confused can be easily controlled. I've recently been re-reading the books of American evolutionary biologist Jared Diamond, especially Guns, Germs, and Steel. He has some points, but his most important flaw is his complete failure to explain how the Greater Middle East went from being a global center of civilization, which it was in ancient times, to being a global center of anti-civilization. This was not caused by smallpox or because zebras are more difficult to domesticate than water buffaloes. It was caused by Islam. Diamond, with his emphasis on historical materialism, fails to explain the rise of the West and especially why English, not Arabic, Chinese or Mayan, became the global lingua franca. What's so special about those rainy and foggy islands? As Australian author Keith Windschuttle told a New Zealand audience, "The concepts of free enquiry and free expression and the right to criticise entrenched beliefs are things we take so much for granted they are almost part of the air we breathe. We need to recognise them as distinctly Western phenomena." He warns that the survival of this great achievement now depends entirely "on whether we have the intelligence to understand their true value and the will to face down their enemies. "No other civilization on earth ever created an equivalent of the European university system. One of the most important reasons why Europe surpassed China during the early modern age is more political freedom and free speech. The reason why English became the dominant language is because Britain and its offspring enjoyed great political liberty even by Western standards, and a corresponding economic dynamism. Probably no empire in world history has been more benevolent than the British Empire, yet a report from February 2008 recommended that patriotism should be avoided in school lessons because British history is "morally ambiguous." I suppose Islamic history isn't, with almost 1400 years of brutal Jihad warfare on several continents? I'm sure the British are being told that the ongoing mass immigration is a result of their "colonial history." I live in a country with no colonial history, yet we are still subject to mass immigration. We are also being told that we should allow Pakistani or Nigerian flags to celebrate our Constitution Day because this will be "good for integration." This has nothing to do with colonialism. So what does it have to do with? Well, I'm starting to wonder whether it has something to do with the Western love affair with free speech and political liberty. Those who desire a world where society is regulated and everybody does what the authorities tell them to do fear this Western preference for political self-determination. If we look at the West during the past thousand years, we have generally enjoyed an unusually high degree of freedom and power sharing. This has been the case more in some periods and countries than in others, but in the big scheme of things this remains true. However, although this arrangement has been good for our civilization as a whole, some of our elites apparently are jealous of the more authoritarian system in other cultures. They want to turn the West into a "normal," meaning more corrupt and less free, civilization, aided by the forces of globalization. We are witnessing rising nepotism, and perhaps those at the top desire this.The political elites no longer believe in stupid things such as borders, cultures and national sovereignty. Islam upsets their world-view, so they ignore it and move on with their project of globalization, anyway. The most hardcore Leftists actively side with Islam because its hatred of the West and its concept of a global umma coincide with their own globalist outlook. Yes, I know that Socrates stated "I am not an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world," but I don't think he meant it quite as literally as Western elites do now. Socrates didn't have an entire village of Muslims transplanted to his street during the space of a single generation, and he didn't have his daughters or female relatives raped by Muslims in his own country. Our traditional freedoms were the result of a specific culture, developed over centuries of hard struggles. Maybe other cultures have to go through similar struggles of their own to achieve this, and some will perhaps never be able to do so. We should protect our freedoms at home before we try to export them, and we should protect them by preserving the European-derived culture which created them. Our enemies, internal and external, want to destroy the Western world because we represent liberty, and they want to destroy Britain in particular because it gave birth to the most powerful pro-liberty culture within the Western tradition. I hope the British can regain their strength and throw off their traitor class, but they need to do so soon. We cannot allow the greatest nation in human history to be destroyed by the planet's most barbaric cultures. The British people, like their Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish and Danish counterparts, have every right to desire self-determination and self-preservation, and limit or even completely halt immigration as they see fit to ensure this. Those who say otherwise are evil, and need to be exposed as such. The Western world is under attack by a global Islamic Jihad. To support continued mass immigration of Muslims in this situation should be regarded as high treason, and punished as such.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

INFANT SEX IN ISLAM

CLICK ON ARTICLE TITLE ABOVE TO VIEW ARTICLE
(NOTHING GRAPHIC)

IRAN INCREASINGLY COMING INTO U.S. ATTACK CROSSHAIR FOCUS

By Basil Adas, Correspondent Baghdad: A proposed Iraqi-American security agreement will include permanent American bases in the country, and the right for the United States to strike, from within Iraqi territory, any country it considers a threat to its national security, Gulf News has learned. Senior Iraqi military sources have told Gulf News that the long-term controversial agreement is likely to include three major items. Under the agreement, Iraqi security institutions such as Defence, Interior and National Security ministries, as well as armament contracts, will be under American supervision for ten years. The agreement is also likely to give American forces permanent military bases in the country, as well as the right to move against any country considered to be a threat against world stability or acting against Iraqi or American interests. The military source added, "According to this agreement, the American forces will keep permanent military bases on Iraqi territory, and these will include Al Asad Military base in the Baghdadi area close to the Syrian border, Balad military base in northern Baghdad close to Iran, Habbaniyah base close to the town of Fallujah and the Ali Bin Abi Talib military base in the southern province of Nasiriyah close to the Iranian border." The sources confirmed that the American army is in the process of completing the building of the military facilities and runways for the permanent bases. He added that the American air bases in Kirkuk and Mosul will be kept for no longer than three years. However, he said there were efforts by the Americans to include the Kirkuk base in the list of permanent bases. The sources also said that a British brigade was expected to remain at the international airport in Basra for ten years as long as the American troops stayed in the permanent bases in Iraq. Iraqi analysts said that the second item of the controversial agreement which permits American forces on Iraqi territories to launch military attacks against any country it considers a threat is addressed primarily to Iran and Syria. Iran has raised serious concerns in the past few days over the Iraqi-American security agreement and followed it with issuing religious fatwas and called for demonstrations, mainly by the powerful Shiite leader Moqtada Al Sadr movement, who is close to Iran, against the agreement.

OBAMA IS NOT OLD AND CONFUSED?

CLICK ON TITLE/SUBJECT ABOVE TO GO TO FULL ARTICLE 57 states

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

ACTIVIST DHIMMI

By Paul Sperry If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That appears to be the strategy of GOP powerbroker Grover Norquist in his wicked project to dress Islamists up as patriotic Republicans so they can infiltrate the government. While he’s managed to get some of his Muslim proteges jobs in the Bush administration, getting them elected to public office has been another story. Voters aren’t buying their makeover. Last November, his crony Faisal M. Gill lost a bid for a seat in the Virginia state legislature. Now another protege, Kamal M. Nawash, has lost his third political race in seven years. Republicans in Virginia’s most affluent county last month overwhelmingly rejected Nawash as their party leader. Gill and Nawash failed despite the ringing endorsements and behind-the-scenes maneuvering of Norquist, who founded the Islamic Institute (where he met his Palestinian wife) with the express purpose of promoting such Muslims into positions of power. Take Nawash, who also happens to be Palestinian. In 2003, Norquist hosted a fundraiser for him at his Capitol Hill townhouse to launch his campaign for the Virginia state senate. And Norquist’s partner Khaled A. Saffuri kicked in $1,279 to help build his war chest. Nawash made for a strange Republican candidate. As an immigration lawyer he defended Arab criminals against deportation, and as legal director of the extremist American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, he fought to deny law enforcement key anti-terror tools. A month before the election, Nawash rushed to the defense of a prominent Islamist leader and political donor, who was arrested on terrorism charges. His crony, Abdurahman Alamoudi, was no dimestore terrorist. It turned out that Alamoudi, according to the Treasury Department, acted as one of al-Qaida’s top fundraisers in America – all the while pumping more cash into Nawash’s campaign than any other individual contributor. Nawash argued the case against Alamoudi was baseless and politically motivated, according to the Islamist internet site IslamOnline.net, which identified him as Alamoudi’s lawyer. “He is just a liberal Muslim, who wants more Muslims to be involved in the U.S. military and politics,” Nawash said of his longtime friend, client and donor. That “liberal” Muslim is in fact a longtime leader in the radical Muslim Brotherhood who’s now serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. When Nawash’s opponent in the race used his quotes against him, Nawash denied Alamoudi was a client. He said IslamOnline.net erroneously identified him as the terrorist’s lawyer, even though Nawash’s own brother worked for the website. Documents put the lie to Nawash’s denial. For starters, Nawash’s signature appears at the bottom of a “Power of Attorney” affidavit for Alamoudi at the Fairfax Circuit Court of Virginia. In that 2003 document, Nawash swears: “I am attorney-in-fact for Abdurahman M. Alamoudi.” What’s more, one of his then-law partners, May Shallal Kheder, shows up in court filings as a member of Alamoudi’s criminal defense team. Nawash’s old law firm, Hanania Kheder & Nawash PC, kept an office in Falls Church, Va., in the same building as the Saudi-backed Muslim Students Association, which was founded by the Brotherhood. The Saudi-based World Assembly of Muslim Youth, which sponsors jihad camps that teach boys not to be “miserly with your blood,” also was a tenant at one time. Nawash lived nearby in the Skyline Towers, known by law enforcement as the “Taliban Towers.” Since 9/11, the FBI has paid numerous visits to the apartment complex, which erupted in cheers as the hijackers attacked America. During his campaign, Nawash put up signs at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center where some of the hijackers received aid and comfort. Dar al-Hijrah is run by the pro-jihad Brotherhood. Ultimately, his bid to become the first Muslim in the Virginia assembly failed. Nawash garnered just 30 percent of the vote, while his opponent, Democrat Mary Margaret Whipple, took 70 percent. The defeat matched his unsuccessful run for the Virginia House of Delegates in 2001, also bankrolled by Alamoudi and his radical Brothers. Bitter, Nawash blamed his 2003 drubbing on Whipple’s tactic of focusing on his ties to a suspected terrorist. “She is a mean-spirited racist,” he said. The ambitious Nawash and his mentor Norquist were not deterred, however. What the protege needed was a little makeover, along with a little time to allow memories to fade. The next year, Nawash for the first time gave money to the GOP (a measly $200 to the Republican Party of Virginia), and proceeded to wrap himself in the American flag. Repositioning himself as a hawk in the war on terror, he set up a moderate nonprofit group called the Free Muslims Coalition to promote “a modern secular interpretation of Islam which is peace-loving, democracy-loving and compatible with other faiths and beliefs.” Suddenly, the man who socialized with and defended radical jihadists was attacking extremism and terrorism “unambiguously,” as he trumpets on his website. Even as his Free Muslims movement at the same time defends Islam against “the venomous attacks by the Christian Taliban,” it has won over many skeptics, including some it’s counted among the so-called Christian Taliban. But it wasn’t enough to win over rock-ribbed Republicans. Earlier this year, Nawash announced he was running for chairman of the Fairfax County Republican Committee in Virginia. He campaigned on a platform of change and diversity – that is, broadening the tent to include more Muslims like him. “We have to attract new people and improve our image,” he said. “We will welcome new people.” He lost the election by another wide margin. Nawash garnered just 30 votes out of 219 at the convention, held last month. Faisal Muhammad Gill Another ambitious Norquist protege, Faisal Muhammad Gill, has suffered a similar fate. Gill, a Republican in name only, is still sulking over his humiliating political defeat last November. Following in Nawash’s footsteps, the Islamic Institute alumnus lost a bid for a seat in the Virginia state legislature. He, too, blames dirty Democrat politics for his Virginia assembly race loss. But like Nawash before him, he has only himself to blame. Gill’s ties to Muslim Brotherhood front groups and known and suspected terrorists turned off not just Democrat voters, but also Republican voters. Doubts arose in spite of heavy lobbying and fundraising by Norquist, who continues to act as an agent of influence for Islamists and their subversive interests in Washington. (The normally stingy Norquist even chipped in $200 of his own money for Gill, while also attending his campaign kickoff.) In fact, it was concerned Republicans – resentful of Norquist foisting a flawed candidate on them – who circulated a flier around Northern Virginia’s 51st district warning voters about Gill’s terrorist connections. “Faisal Gill worked with Abdurahman Alamoudi at the American Muslim Council,” the flier read. “Alamoudi is a supporter of al-Qaida, Hamas and Hezbollah terror groups.” That’s no exaggeration. Here’s what Treasury had to say about him in 2005: “Alamoudi had a close relationship with al-Qaida and had raised money for al-Qaida in the United States.” The flier didn’t even mention the thousands of dollars in campaign donations Gill hauled in from a still-active Alamoudi-tied network of suspected terror fronts raided by federal agents after 9/11. Virginia state records show that Mena Investments, Reston Investments and Sterling Management Group Inc. gave a combined $3,000 to Gill. The Herndon, Va.-based entities are part of the so-called Safa group, a pro-jihad Islamist network which remains under active federal investigation for tax fraud, money laundering and terror financing. (Even Democrat lawmakers in past elections have had to return Safa’s terror-tainted gifts. But Gill, an alleged Republican, had no problem keeping his.) All three entities are run by M. Yacub Mirza, who like Gill is a native of al-Qaida hotbed Karachi, Pakistan. (Many of the supporters Gill packed into the nominating convention spoke Urdu, the language of Pakistan, while others spoke Arabic, some even shouting “Allah Akbar” as Gill spoke.) Mirza is said to act on behalf of Saudi millionaire and al-Qaida financier Yassin al-Qadi, and also was closely associated with al-Qaida bagman Alamoudi. Mirza hasn’t been charged with any crimes, but his financial activities recently raised red flags at Wachovia Bank. After he funneled $150,000 to a shady Muslim charity, Wachovia closed the charity’s bank accounts due to suspicious activity related to possible money laundering. This is who helped underwrite Gill’s campaign last year. And there may be more to that story. While Gill and his campaign were raking in cash from the Safa group, his own personal fortune escalated rapidly. The source of his newfound wealth remains a mystery. At the time, the 35-year-old Gill had just opened a law practice with a partner fresh out of law school, and the firm had no bankable revenue stream. Yet within 18 months of hanging a shingle, Gill managed to shell out some $25,000 in political contributions, and buy a Washington Redskins skybox adjacent to the owner’s box. Such suites cost upward of $200,000 a year. What’s more, he purchased a new home for about $730,000. His wife doesn’t work and stays at home with his kids, who are enrolled in private schools. His lavish lifestyle includes membership in the exclusive Capital Society. It’s plain that Gill has some powerful and deep-pocketed patrons. And they’ve also contributed heavily to Nawash, who state records show received thousands from Safa during his 2003 campaign – including $4,000 from Reston Investments and a whopping $7,000 from the International Institute of Islamic Thought, or IIIT, another Safa cut-out accused of funneling money to terrorist groups. (In fact, former IIIT official Tarik Hamdi is said to have even personally delivered a battery for a satellite phone used by Osama bin Laden to coordinate and order the African embassy bombings.) Gill blames Democratic opponent Paul Nichols for distributing the flier linking him to Alamoudi. He maintains he was “attacked just because I am of the Islamic faith.” “Nichols is the only one who benefits from this,” Gill charged. In fact, Nichols, who easily won the race, refrained from even raising the issue in his debates with Gill. It’s the citizens of Virginia, and all Americans, who benefit from Gill’s political demise. The man simply cannot be trusted. In an effort to hide his ties to Alamoudi, Gill omitted his past employment as a lobbyist for Alamoudi from not only his campaign website but his current resume. As you’ll recall, the omission landed him in hot water at the high-level job Norquist finagled for him at the Department of Homeland Security (in fact, Gill used Norquist as a reference). In 2001, Gill worked for Alamoudi’s American Muslim Council as governmental affairs director. While there, he helped AMC lobby Congress to repeal the Justice Department’s use of undisclosed evidence against suspected Mideast terrorists in deportation proceedings. He also joined now-confessed terrorist Sami al-Arian in lobbying the White House. Gill also served as AMC’s official spokesman, and had several meetings with Alamoudi. That paid stint has been bleached from his current bio, just as it was from the job application form that Gill filled out to obtain his DHS position as senior adviser to the department official in charge of intelligence and infrastructure protection, and to obtain a security clearance covering top secret and sensitive-compartmented information. Although Gill resigned from the department under an ethical cloud, he insists he was cleared of any wrongdoing. “All these allegations are false and have been proven to be false,” he claimed. However, the DHS inspector general didn’t exactly exonerate him. He concluded only that he could find no evidence that Gill had “falsified” relevant information or “intentionally” omitted it. In fact, former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin – the official whose office investigated Gill – was troubled by Gill’s ties to Alamoudi, and now questions why he was ever hired for such a sensitive post in the first place. “Should anyone even remotely connected to terrorism be employed by Homeland Security in any capacity, especially the ultrasensitive area of intelligence and infrastructure protection?” Ervin said regarding Gill in his book, “Open Target.” Indeed, this former lobbyist for a known al-Qaida terrorist had access to top secret U.S. intelligence involving not only border security, but cyber-security, including new data-sharing programs integrating terrorist watch lists. Actually, Gill still has access to such intelligence. His TS/SCI clearance was never revoked. The government may want to review his clearance based on other ethical lapses that have come to light since he left the government. Gill has shown a pattern of omission and deception. After leaving DHS, Gill immediately got into more hot water when he threatened to sue a Virginia blogger critical of a friend who was running for office in Virginia. Gill, who was working as spokesman for his pal’s campaign, in May 2006 fired off a letter from what appeared to be a phony law firm – Gill & Gallinger. For starters, the letterhead contained a typo: “COUNSLEORS AT LAW.” The fax number listed for the firm’s Washington, D.C., office had a northern Virginia area code – (703) versus (202) for the district – and its “New York” office listed in the letter’s footer did not even exist. What’s more, the law firm was not registered with the Virginia State Corporation Commission. And Gill was not even licensed to practice in Virginia. In other words, he misrepresented himself. His letter threatening legal action under Virginia defamation law was calculated to intimidate the blogger. Gill is, however, a registered agent for something called Sapentia LLC in Tysons Corner, Va. – which only raises more ethical questions. Gill’s partner in the lobbying firm is one Asim A. R. Ghafoor. The two go way back, having previously worked together at both Gill & Ghafoor and AG Consulting Group before Gill landed a job in the Bush administration. None of these partnerships show up on Gill’s resume – for good reason. Ghafoor is a Saudi lobbyist who has been caught up in U.S. counterterrorism investigations. According to lobbying disclosure records on file at the Senate, he has lobbied on behalf of Specially Designated Terrorist Organizations including the Saudi-owned al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, which the Treasury Department says has acted as a charitable front for al-Qaida. In fact, Ghafoor lobbied Treasury to take al-Haramain and one of its U.S.-based directors off its blacklist and unfreeze their assets. That director, Saudi national Soliman al-Buthe, was blacklisted as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist after his conversations with Ghafoor were tapped by the U.S. government. Ghafoor has also represented Saudi billionaire Saleh Abdullah Kamel, head of the Dallah al-Baraka Group, a suspected al-Qaida banker. It should come as no surprise then that this longtime partner of Gill is a self-proclaimed sharia-law advocate. Once, in an Islamic forum, Ghafoor beseeched Muslims to Islamize America. “We are here for a purpose,” he said. “We are here not to just be nice to people, but to bring Islamic ways to this country.” Regarding the U.S. system of government, he also stated: “I believe it’s our duty that that is minimized and, Insha’allah (Allah willing), one day eliminated.” Ghafoor’s entreaty echoes that of Alamoudi, the now-jailed godfather of the Muslim mafia in America, who once told a Muslim audience: “Either we do it now or we do it after a hundred years, but this country will become a Muslim country. If we are outside this country, we can say, ‘Oh, Allah, destroy America.’ But once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it.” It was Alamoudi who originally bankrolled Norquist’s Islamic Institute – long before authorities busted Alamoudi trying to smuggle a suitcase full of $340,000 in cash into the U.S. from the Middle East. No doubt other suitcases made it through customs, begging the question: Who really supplied the seed capital for Norquist’s project? Who are his other silent partners? Both Ghafoor and Gill have worked with Norquist at his institute in Washington. Gill, in fact, served as his director of governmental affairs, another position missing from his resume. (Interestingly, Norquist now omits the Islamic Institute from his own resume, even though he founded the lobby group.) Don’t be surprised if Gill tries, with Norquist’s help, to reinvent himself again, and shows up on another ballot. But don’t be fooled. He says he believes in “patriotism” and the “American dream,” but he’s betrayed not only by the company he keeps, but his own words. Within months of the 9/11 attacks, Gill gave a seminar to young Muslims gathered in Washington for the annual conference of the Muslim Students Association, which was founded by leaders of the radical Muslim Brotherhood. The topic: “Muslims in North America: Political Activism.” Gill gave the youth there tips on how to “cultivate the society for Islam.” Does this sound like a patriot who believes in the American dream? Expedient duplicity shows up elsewhere, as well. On his campaign website, Republican Gill vowed to “crack down on illegal immigration.” “We need to secure our border, cut off benefits to illegals, and enter into agreements to allow state and local police agencies to enforce immigration laws,” he said. But while he was talking tough on immigration, he and his law firm were soliciting illegal immigrant clients to defend. “Even if you or your loved one is already in the process of being removed from the U.S., we can help you qualify for protection from deportation,” Gill has advertised on his firm’s website. He and his partner Ghafoor also help secure R-1 religious workers visas for Muslim clerics from Pakistan and other al-Qaida hotspots. Early last decade, the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in America wrote an 18-page manifesto, titled “General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.” Their secret plan was to form legitimate-sounding Muslim NGOs like the MSA and AMC and use them to infiltrate and subvert the U.S. political system. Translated from Arabic, the document reads in part: “(Our) work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Another document in Arabic found on the home computer of al-Arian states: “Our presence in North America gives us a unique opportunity to monitor, explore and follow up. We should be able to infiltrate the sensitive intelligence agencies or the embassies in order to collect information.” In other words, their goal is to infiltrate the U.S. political system and undermine it from within. Scandalously, they have in Norquist a powerful inside-the-Beltway friend who’s still helping them run influence operations against the government - now under the cynically patriotic guise of GOP candidacy. Paul Sperry is a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington. He can be conacted at Sperry@SperryFiles.com

Monday, June 02, 2008

KURDISH GROUPS FIGHTING MULLAHS EVEN INSIDE TEHRAN

Click on title/heading above to go to full article

GLIMPSE OF IRAN CORRUPTION

Iran Courts Chip Away At Millionaire's Sentence
by Farangis Najibullah (& comments by Alan)



A former shopkeeper, Shahram Jazaeri claims to have made at least $180 million

Some Iranians are fond of comparing Shahram Jazaeri to Russia's fallen oil oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

After all, both amassed their fortunes at early ages and both were eventually convicted of defrauding the government.

Unlike the former Yukos oligarch, however, Jazaeri is not known to have harbored political ambitions. Also unlike Khodorkovsky, whose case serves as a reminder of the cost of running afoul of the Kremlin in the Putin era, Jazaeri has twice been the beneficiary of courts interceding on his behalf.
Last week, an Iranian court reduced Jazaeri's already-shortened 14-year prison term to 11 years.
The 36-year-old Iranian is serving a prison term for his involvement in a high-profile corruption case involving politicians and the family members of many famous Iranian clerics, including the supreme leader's brother.
But Jazaeri's ability to run his multimillion-dollar business activities from prison and two reductions in his sentence for white-collar wrongdoing raise questions about the authorities' seriousness in dealing with corruption.

President Mahmud Ahmadinejad and his allies have made corruption a frequent theme of their attacks against entrenched political rivals and a convenient whipping boy during the president's whistle-stop tours to drum up support for his policies.

But the leniency now being afforded to Jazaeri could prompt public skepticism of the authorities' willingness to tackle corruption, particularly since it appears that no officials have ever been prosecuted in the case.

Jazaeri reportedly confessed during his 2001 trial to paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to Hadi Khamenei -- the brother of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who holds ultimate political and religious power under Iran's Islamic constitution -- as well as to former parliament speaker Mehdi Kahrubi.

Kahrubi has denied any suggestion of bribery and described the claim as a politically motivated attack on the legislature, the Majlis.

The scandal has mostly been linked to reformist politicians, but allegations of cash for favors in Jazaeri's case have extended to both reformists and conservatives alike.
Jazaeri was arrested in 2001 and charged with a long list of crimes including bribery, forging official documents, and massive embezzlement of state money and assets.

Key details of Jazaeri's alleged illegal activities were not disclosed during his trial, sparking speculation that officials were trying to cover up their own involvement in the case.

Qassem Sholeh-Saadi, an Iranian lawyer and former legislator, tells RFE/RL's Radio Farda that although Jazaeri was found guilty of bribing some officials, not a single official has been tried or punished in any way for taking the bribes.
"Only Mr. Shahram Jazaeri has been prosecuted and convicted," Sholeh-Saadi says. "I have never heard of any of those people who received this illegal money -- or bribe -- have been prosecuted or convicted."

Jazaeri emerged from modest beginnings and worked as a shopkeeper in the western city of Ahvaz until his mid-20s.

By the time he was arrested in 2001, at the age of 29, Jazaeri had made some $180 million by his own account.

Many of his business activities are unknown, but he has founded several successful enterprises and worked as a broker in the oil business.

His 2002 trial reportedly involved 50 defendants -- many of them the sons of prominent clerics.

Jazaeri was convicted and initially sentenced to 27 years in prison. In 2004, his sentence was partially overturned and reduced to 14 years.

In February 2007, Iran's Special Judicial Complex for Economic Affairs announced that Jazaeri had escaped while being transferred for a hearing before an expert financial committee.

Reports have suggested that Jazaeri had previously been allowed leaves from prison, a privilege unavailable to most inmates.

Iranian media suggested that some clerics were involved in aiding that escape. Iran's judiciary fired several officials who were involved in his case, including the head of Tehran's vaunted Evin Prison and a number of judges.

Soon afterward, Iranian security services confirmed that Jazaeri had been arrested in an Arab country, with some reports saying he had been hiding in a remote village in Oman.

Many Iranian prisoners suffer desperate conditions with little access to the outside world. But Jazaeri reportedly has access to a laptop computer and mobile phone while in jail, where he continues to manage his business interests.

Alan note: here's some background on Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei whose brother was accused above of receiving money from Jazayeri.

Prior to the Khomeini revolution "ayatollah" Khamenei lived in a single room dwelling in one of the poorest parts of the North Eastern "holy" city of Mashhad and subsisted on food packages from the Imam Reza Shrine (Moslem Saint of Miracles) as charity.

He eked out a bare subsistence by tagging uninvited, among others, onto burials at cemeteries and begging for alms while spouting prayers for the dead person he did not know.

Greater poverty than of this pauper is hard to imagine and irked him.

He is on record of having been asked that if ever he became the Shah what would be his greatest priority?
He replied "to ensure all Iranians were financially comfortable and not facing his lack of money.

This same pauper recently reportedly moved nearly TWO BILLION DOLLARS to Islamic banks in Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore to avoid the funds being seized or frozen by UN sanctions and Wesern banks.

Meanwhile, he is now in supreme charge of a populace that cannot afford basic food costs, let alone pay rent and utilities or pursue happiness.

It appears he has turned almost everyone, except the corrupt Mullah predators and their henchmen, paramilitary forces, including law enforcement agents, into the paupers he used to be,

Without any twinge of conscience or memory of how hard life can be and used to be for him until he amassed an unjustifiable fortune.

The hypcrisy of the Mullahs shows clearly in these two Kayhan (Iran) Headlines around the time of the revolution.

The top one instructs nobody to buy a house adding we will make you a homeowner (give you a free one).

The lower graphic quotes Khomeini daying, "Clerics must never become 'President' of the Republic". Meaning, never take charge of the country's administration and governance.

IRAQI FORCES MOPPING UP IRANIAN BACKED MAHDI FIGHTERS

Iraqi and Coalition forces press operations against the Mahdi Army in Baghdad and Basrah despite the cease-fire signed with the Mahdi Army in Sadr City. The Iraqi Army has expanded its operations in Basrah province to the east just along the Iranian border, while eleven Mahdi Army fighters have been captured during operations in Baghdad over the past 24 hours. Iraqi soldiers and police, backed by US and British advisers, have expanded Operation Knights’ Assault to the eastern town of Abu Al Khasib, a region east of Basrah on the Iranian border. A brigade from the 1st Iraqi Army Division, backed by a battalion from 14th Iraqi Army Division and two Iraqi National Police battalions conducted operations along the border over the past two days. One suspect was detained and 52 AK-47 assault rifles and one sub-machinegun were found during the sweep. Abu Al Khasib is sited on Highway 6 at the border crossing with Iran at Shalamcheh. The Iranian city of Shalamcheh is the main forward operating base for the Ramazan Corps's southernmost command. The Ramazan Corps is the Iranian Qods Force command assigned to direct operations inside Iraq. Weapons, fighters, and cash smuggled across the border into Basrah would pass through Abu Al Khasib. The Iraqi Army has been expanding its operations along the Iranian supply routes in the South during the month of May. After clearing the Mahdi Army and other Iranian-backed militias from Basrah, operations have expanded into Az Zubayr and Al Qurnah. Iraqi troops from the 1st Iraqi Army Division entered Az Zubayr on May 25. Az Zubayr, which is just southeast of the city of Basrah, sits at the crossroads to Nasariyah, a tactical distribution hub for Iranian weapons. Mahdi Army Special groups would pass through Az Zubayr as the moved weapons from Iran to Basrah to Nasariyah. Iraqi Special Operations Forces captured a Special Groups financier and weapons smuggler in Az Zubayr on May 21. Click on link for "Ramazan Ratlines" ALLOW active graphic to function to end: http://www.longwarjournal.org/multimedia/071203_ratlines/071203_ratlines.htm An operation was conducted by Iraqi security forces in the city of Al Qurnah, which is about 50 miles north of Basrah, on May 13. Multinational Forces Iraq described the move into Al Qurnah as “a new phase of operation ” that “continues the process of targeting criminal elements by the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Security Forces as strongholds previously dominated by criminal militias fall." Al Qurnah is one of several strategic distribution hubs for Iranian made weapons, such as rockets, mortars, and the deadly explosively formed projectile roadside bombs. Weapons flow acruss the border from Majnun in Iran to Al Qurnah. These weapons are warehoused in Qurnah and distributed to forward locations to conduct attacks against Iraqi security forces and Iraqi officials, and Coalition forces. Pressure on the Mahdi Army continues in Baghdad While operations progress in the South, Iraqi and US forces conduct raids against the Mahdi Army in Baghdad. Eleven Mahdi Army fighters have been captured in Baghdad during the past 24 hours. Coalition forces captured four Mahdi Army fighters, including a “an individual suspected of smuggling Iranian weapons and coordinating Special Groups training in Iran” and “training others in sniper tactics and acting as a key conduit between Special Groups leaders in the western Baghdad area” during a raid in the Kadhamiyah district on June 1. Iraqi Special Operations Forces captured a Special Groups operative behind rocket and mortar attacks along with another Mahdi Army fighter on May 31. The same day, US troops captured five Mahdi army fighters in separate actions in West Rashid, East Rashid, Mansour, and Adhamiyah. One of the men was behind EFP attacks, another was a weapons smuggler, facilitator and improvised explosive device maker, and another was responsible for conducting ethnic cleansing and weapons smuggling. The Mahdi Army Special Groups are still conducting attacks against US and Iraqi forces in Baghdad. A US soldier was killed in an EFP attack in northeastern Baghdad on June 1. The district was not named, but the US and Iraqi forces have been active against the Mahdi Army in New Baghdad since the Sadr City cease-fire was signed in mid-May.

Sunday, June 01, 2008

EVERY YOUTUBE VIDEO ON ANTIMULLAH has RETURNED

Google and Youtube have restored all my videos. Thanks. Apparently Google Blog has been having a problem with FTP files and is working on it so I hope the YouTube subsidiary problem is part of that and not aimed at AntiMullah.

ISLAMIC IRAN HOMELESS STREET CHILDREN & MORE DETAILS

gatewaypundit (click to view original Islamic News posted by GP after reading the related additional information below, added to their good find). GP has posted an article originating from a small, regional center, Caspian seaside town, admitting to 30,000 homeless street children throughout Islamic Iran. For quite some time AntiMullah has been quoting background sources inside Iran putting this figure at closer to 500,000 homeless street children just in the capital city of TEHRAN. To which you can add over 100,000 abandoned street women, again just in Tehran. During the Presidency of Khatami, being plugged everywhere as a "reformist", several orphanages were closed by him "as too expensive to keep open" and the children thrown in to the street with no care as to what would happen to them. The latter are usually women divorced for younger wives (or disobeying a husband even in the smallest way) or women rejected by their families as mouths to feed but unable to help the family budget. Or runaways from brutal treatment at home by parents or male heads of household. As you can imagine they fall prey to the sadism of the regime's law enforcement personnel, who demand their bodies and use them to deal drugs. In all instances they are in the streets fending the best they can in a harsh Islamic regime that cares little or nothing about the welfare of their populace. To get a clearer picture of the size of the problem, Tehran has an estimated population of some eight to 10 million people, as compared to Islamic Iran's 70 million total population. To extrapolate within reason, this would indicate at least two or three million women and children nationwide, as homelessness exists even in small towns. The stupendous windfall profits from Oil the Mullahs have been getting in increasing leaps and bounds tinges this in a horrible light, showing up how they prefer to spend money on terrorism than on the well being of their nationals. And makes it amazing that Dhimmis (non-Moslem Islamist supporters) in the USA in general and naive Obama and Democrat attitudes can fly in the face of this evidence of callous disregard for anybody's well being. Why would they listen to anything Obama has to say? Or be moved by his oratorcial rhetoric or persuasion efforts? Is there anything - other than - "I will bomb the heck out of you" - that would bring them around to his point of view? The Mullahs have refused to listen to anyone for a whole GENERATION, what does Obama or anyone who agrees with "negotiating" with Islamic Iran think they can offer for Iran to back down or back off? Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei has recently established ties through marriage with Iraq's Grand Ayatollah Sistani, bonding the Iranian clerics to the Iraqi Shia leadership. His bride's father Adel Haddad, who is related to Ayatollah Sistani, is being groomed to become the next President of Islamic Iran, not allowing Ahmadi-Nejad the Turd, a second term. However, the newly elected (still temporary) Speaker of the Islamic Parliament, Larijani, increasingly a foe for the Turd will certaily throw his hat into the ring. Other indicators point to Khamenei "electing/appointing" former President Khatami to the position to have a stalking horse again wtih which to blind the West and pretend the Mullah regime has a "democratic" government with whom to negotiate, and negotiate and negotiate till we get thrown under the bus by Islamic Iran's nuclear capabilities. Would you listen to anyone when everything seems to be going your way in the USA? From the successful influence and lobbying of Islamic groups, and the Democrats with Obama at the spearhead supporting you, to the apparent inability or intent toward military action. MEANWHILE TAKE A LOOK AT THE VACATION HOME IN THAT SAME TOWN OF RASHT BUILT AND OWNED BY A SUPPORTER DURING THE MULLAH REGIME. RASHT VACATION HOME click here MORE INFORMATION ABOUT TEHRAN TODAY TEHRAN TODAY click here

ENGLISH & PERSIAN SONG

Chris de Burgh and the Persian Arian Band play together in a bilingual performance

Link still there but not the video