Wednesday, April 13, 2011

BRIDGETTE FOR TRUMP - FACTCHECK.ORG - YOU'RE FIRED!




BRIDGETTE BLOWS FACTCHECK.ORG OUT OF THE WATER!
by WTPOTUS,




How many lies have been told and policies changed to cover for Obama's lack of eligibility?

(Apr. 13, 2011) — This is in response to an article from FactCheck Blog, “Donald, You’re Fired!”, posted on April 9, 2011. Excerpts from their article are included for ease of rebuttal–an educational effort.


If FactCheck staffers worked for us, we’d have to say: “FactCheck, You’re fired–for incompetence, blatant obfuscation, and use of Alinsky tactics!” When it comes to getting facts straight, FactCheck fails miserably, again, and again, and again.


Point by Point Rebuttal


FactCheck said:


Trump claims the president’s grandmother says Obama was born in Kenya. In fact, the recording to which he refers shows Sarah Obama repeatedly saying through a translator: “He was born in America.”


TRUTH: She said this only after a “long pause” during which a conversation in a Kenyan tongue took place in the background, between several men and Sarah Obama, right after she very clearly stated that she was present in Kenya at his birth. Did these men intimidate her into changing her story? You be the judge. Many benefits subsequently flowed to the Obama family, such as a paved road, electricity, and piped-in water after they supported Obama in his endeavors. Early on, Kenyans did not realize the importance of a US birth for any presidential candidate.


FactCheck produced a supposed transcript of the conversation between Mr. McRae and Sarah Obama. But there’s no translation of the conversation in a Kenyan dialect that can be heard in the background, between what sounds like several men and Sarah Obama.


FactCheck transcribed another part of the conversation thusly:


Translator: Sir, she says he was born in Hawaii.


McRae: OK.


Translator: Yeah, in 1960 this was Hawaii, where his father, his father was also marrying there. This was Hawaii.


Obama claims that he was born in 1961. But Sarah said 1960.


FactCheck said:


Trump claims that no hospital in Hawaii has a record of Obama’s birth. Hospital records are confidential under federal law, but Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Medical Center has published a letter from Obama calling it “the place of my birth,” thus publicly confirming it as his birthplace.


TRUTH: The hospital promptly removed that letter from its website, where it had been used for fundraising, after its provenance was questioned and after persons who know stated that if the letter is fraudulent, the hospital would be in violation of the law. The letter is now hidden from view.


Senator Slom of Hawaii has repeatedly asked to see it but has not been allowed to see it. He is told, but does not know for certain, that the letter is on display in a private office for safekeeping.


The White House will NOT confirm that the letter was written by, signed by, or sent by the POTUS. Numerous articles preceding the revelation of this letter, which named Kapiolani as his birth place, said that he was born at Queen’s Medical–another hospital altogether.


FactCheck said:


Trump insists that the official “Certification of Live Birth” that Obama produced in 2008 is “not a birth certificate.” That’s wrong. The U.S. Department of State uses “birth certificate” as a generic term to include the official Hawaii document, which satisfies legal requirements for proving citizenship and obtaining a passport.


TRUTH: The “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB) that was posted as a digital image on partisan blogs (Daily Kos and FactCheck) and in a campaign ad (Fight the Smears) is NOT an “official Certification of Live Birth” nor is it a “birth certificate.” Obama did not produce it; it was released by his campaign, not by Obama. It’s a digital image.


When originally released, that digital image was modified, because the identification number on it was redacted. It says at the bottom of the image, “Any alterations invalidate this certificate.” It was altered; therefore, it is invalid.


It matters not what the State Dept. calls such documents, when they’re in three-dimensional form. The state of Hawaii did not, in 2007, consider a “certification of live birth” to be the same as a “birth certificate” or a “certificate of birth.”


It also matters not whether the State Dept. would accept a COLB (in 3-D form) to satisfy “legal requirements for proving citizenship and obtaining a passport.” Natural born citizenship differs from simple citizenship, which is sufficient to receive a passport.


No doubt, Arnold Schwarzenegger has a US passport. No doubt, today he is a US citizen. However, he is not and never can be eligible for the presidency, short of a Constitutional amendment.


Schwarzenegger is a citizen; he is NOT a “natural born” citizen, which is the standard for POTUS eligibility. As such, he has the same status as Obama: Ineligible, not a NATURAL BORN citizen.


The president has NEVER released any officially certified document that proves that he was born in Hawaii, to the parents he claims, at the time and on the date he claims, at Kapiolani or at Queen’s Medical. He has never produced a “birth certificate”, a “certification of live birth”, a “certificate of live birth”, a “certificate of birth”, or even a “hospital birth certificate”.


FactCheck said:


Trump claims that there’s no signature or certification number on the document released by Obama. Wrong again. Photos of the document, which we posted in 2008, clearly show those details.


TRUTH: The “document” released by the Obama campaign is a digital image that has no certification number and no signature. Who would accept as a “document” a digital image released to partisan blogs and posted on a DNC-affiliated Obama campaign website? Trump refers to the image released by Obama’s campaign, not to photos on a partisan blog, which have no PROVENance. Has Obama or his campaign ever referenced those photographs on FactCheck blog or given them the nod as being authentic? If so, kindly, someone, supply a link.


In fact, no photograph that FactCheck produced of the document, which they claim is the source for the digital image posted on blogs and Obama’s campaign website, shows a certifying signature. They do not show a photograph of the entire back side of the document. Therefore, nobody can say with certainty what that cropped image of a signature block represents.


There is a certification number on photos of the front of the alleged document, which FactCheck blog posted weeks after they posted the original digital image, and only after others (mostly bloggers) questioned the missing certification number.


When bloggers questioned other details, FactCheck blog reduced the size and resolution of the photos and removed all embedded identifying properties. [See their story and note the difference between the claimed resolution and the actual resolution.] Is this how a nonpartisan factchecking organization should behave? Shouldn’t they be more than happy to answer questions? Shouldn’t they welcome examination of their claims? What about transparency? Why have no other members of the media been allowed to see and examine the document that FactCheck blog claims to have photographed?


Why hasn’t Obama presented this “certified document” to judges in any of the court cases addressing his ineligibility? Why have his lawyers fought discovery, if that COLB is a truthful representation of what’s on file in Hawaii?


FactCheck said:


Trump says newspaper announcements of Obama’s birth that appeared in Hawaii newspapers in 1961 ‘probably’ were placed there fraudulently by his now-deceased American grandparents. Actually, a state health department official and a former managing editor of one of the newspapers said the information came straight from the state health department.


TRUTH: Nobody knows with CERTAINTY that those announcements actually ran in newspapers in Hawaii in 1961. But even if they did, FactCheck blog, please NAME the “state health department official” and the “former managing editor” [Shapiro? See below.] who said that these announcements came only from the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH) and tell us upon what they base their knowledge about how things worked in 1961.


Nobody has ever seen these newspaper announcements in reality. That is, nobody has seen any newspaper. They have seen (again) digital images that are SAID to have come from microfilms at the State Library and at the Honolulu Advertiser.


A factchecker would investigate and then NAME the librarian who copied the images from microfilm at the State Library and sent them to a NAMED individual who sent them to the BLOGS where they first appeared.


A factchecker would locate and publish the underlying evidence that supports the provenance of the images, such as the letter or email making the request, the letter or email accompanying the images, and the receipt of payment for the copies.


A factchecker would investigate and then NAME the person at the Honolulu Advertiser who copied the images from microfilm at the newspaper and sent them to a NAMED person, who released them to BLOGS where they first appeared.


Why haven’t these birth announcement images been presented to any of the judges in any of the ineligibility lawsuits, if they are real? In fact, as blogger jbjd pointed out, the closest these images came to being entered into any court filing by Obama’s lawyers was in a footnote, which has no evidentiary value.


Nobody has stated with certainty that the only way a birth could be listed in those announcements in 1961 was if the HDOH sent the name to the newspaper.


Finally–there’s no PROOF whatsoever that the “son” announced in those newspapers (even if the images are authentic) is the person who is now president.


There’s no PROOF who the mother was. Barack Hussein Obama (BHO Sr.) had three if not four or more wives. Any of them could have been the “Mrs.” referred to in the announcements. BHO Sr. had many sons. Any of them could have been the son referred to in those announcements. BHO Sr. never lived at the address listed in the announcements. No place of birth is identified in those announcements.


So even if legitimate (which is in doubt until someone shows a contemporaneous, 3-D newspaper) the announcements do NOT prove that the POTUS was born in Hawaii.


But if BHO Sr. is his father, Obama is NOT a natural born citizen; so it doesn’t matter where he was born.


FactCheck said:


Trump claims “nobody knew” Obama when he was growing up and “nobody ever comes forward” who knew him as a child. “If I ever decide to run, you may go back and interview people from my kindergarten,” Trump said. Well, two retired kindergarten teachers in a 2009 news story fondly recall teaching a young Barack Obama.


TRUTH: While the usual set of “friends” and “teachers” put themselves forward, repeatedly, to claim that they knew him as a child, numerous discrepancies in their various reports raise suspicions. For example, he attended third grade in two countries, on opposite sides of the world.


Strangely enough, the Dept. of Education in Hawaii cannot locate Obama’s kindergarten records. A picture was produced supposedly showing Obama in kindergarten. The story (click link, above) says the caption identifying a certain child as Obama was written on the back of the photo. However, the back of the photo with the caption is conveniently not shown.


The two retired teachers were actually student teachers who said that they did not teach Obama at the same time. One says she assisted his kindergarten teacher during the first part of that school year, while the other says she assisted his kindergarten teacher during the second part of the school year. Of course, the records are missing.


One student teacher described him as “heavy build”, which certainly does not sound like the POTUS. (Look at the photo: He looks thin, not “heavy build”, and his head looks pasted on. A tropical climate, but he alone wears long sleeves.) These women did not know each other at the time but met later, became good friends, compared notes (according to the 2009 story), and were Obama supporters. His actual kindergarten teacher, if the story is true, was Alice Sakai, who died in 2006, and so conveniently cannot be interviewed.


These two student teachers, Obama supporters and good friends, had the same photograph that was already published in the 2008 story. They claimed that Alice Sakai sent the photo to one of them; but of course, she cannot confirm that as true, being sadly deceased.


FactCheck said:


The evidence that Obama was born in the U.S.A. is so overwhelming that we haven’t had much to say lately about the sort of bogus claims that Trump repeats. Hawaii’s top official in charge of vital records stated long ago, for example, that the confidential records underlying Obama’s official birth certificate show that he was born in Hawaii and is “a natural born American citizen.”


TRUTH: There is NO EVIDENCE that Obama was born in the U.S.A. None. If there were, he would have presented it to the courts. If EVIDENCE existed, a MORAL INDIVIDUAL would present it instead of hiding it.


A MORAL INDIVIDUAL would not have allowed a patriot like LTC. LAKIN to be sent to PRISON.




Obama is not a “natural born American citizen.” He may be a US citizen now; but he never was a “natural born” citizen of the USA, unless he’s not telling the truth about the identity of his father.


The father that Obama claims, BHO Sr., was never a US citizen, never an aspiring immigrant, never a permanent resident. Thus, Obama was (as his website indicated) born a British subject, later a Kenyan citizen, and later still an Indonesian citizen (as AP evidence shows). Obama’s site also referred to him as a “native” (not natural born) citizen of the USA.


If he was born outside the USA, he was not even a US citizen at birth. He may now be a naturalized citizen; but if so, he is ineligible for the presidency. No documentation has been found to verify that he ever changed his status: his foreign citizenships may remain active.


FactCheck said:


But when a leading prospect for the Republican presidential nomination embraces and repeats these spurious claims and groundless conspiracy theories on national television, we are forced to wade into this swamp once again. For details of where Trump goes wrong, and full documentation of the facts, please read on to our Analysis section.


TRUTH: No truly nonpartisan, factchecking organization would use terms such as “spurious”, “groundless conspiracy theories” or “swamp” when describing one side of an argument to be analyzed with an open mind and resolved via the presentation of facts. By using such terms, they prove their partisan BIAS.


FactCheck said:


Trump echoed claims that are often repeated by those who wish to believe Obama is not a natural-born American citizen.


TRUTH: We don’t “wish to believe” that Obama is not a natural born citizen; we know that he’s not, unless he’s lying about his father’s identity. Blood AND Soil. The two requirements: Birth on US soil to two US citizen parents. No allegiance to any other country or sovereign, ever, as documented in a detailed analysis by Leo Donofrio, Esq.


FactCheck said:


The proof of Obama’s citizenship has long been apparent to us and, we think, to any reasonable person with a mind open to evidence.


TRUTH: “Citizenship” is not the issue; natural born citizenship is the issue. FactCheck blog has provided no admissible ”evidence” of Obama’s natural born citizenship, to the people or to the courts. What’s apparent to FactCheck is not apparent to REASONABLE persons with open minds who wish only to see PROOF of Obama’s eligibility, which any serious employer would require.


FactCheck said:


The proof is not just the official birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii and made public by the Obama campaign in 2008.


TRUTH: There is no such document. No such document has EVER been presented. It’s a digital image on a partisan blog and in a campaign advertisement. No official birth certificate has ever been presented to any court of law. Nor has any such document been shown to We the People or to our elected representatives or to journalists in the mainstream media.


FactCheck said:


As we wrote when we published detailed photographs of that document in our “Born in the U.S.A.” article, that document constitutes legal proof of citizenship sufficient to meet all U.S. Department of State requirements for issuance of a passport.


TRUTH: The photographs are hardly detailed, especially after being downsized. Notice the conveniently placed shadows and the flares of light that obscure pertinent information. Is this how a reasonable person would photograph a document?


Requirements for obtaining a passport are not the same as requirements for the presidency, as FactCheck well knows. A passport is available to any “citizen”, including naturalized citizens, who are ineligible for the presidency. They are comparing apples and oranges in a transparent and deliberate attempt to reframe the issue. The issue is NATURAL BORN citizenship. See how cleverly they mislead, these so-called, self-proclaimed, “nonpartisan” factcheckers?


FactCheck said:


There also were public announcements of Obama’s birth published in Hawaii newspapers shortly after his birth in 1961.


TRUTH: Nobody has ever produced a newspaper from 1961 that contains that announcement.


FactCheck said:


And the state’s top vital records official, Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, director of the Hawaii Department of Health, issued a statement in 2009 stating that she had “seen the original vital records maintained on file” and that those records, which are confidential under state law, verify that “Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen.”


TRUTH: The vital records, plural, themselves purport to verify that he was born in Hawaii. An affidavit “verifies” a claim, when “to verify” is used in the legal sense of the word. Fukino claimed to have consulted the Hawaiian Attorney General prior to releasing her statement. It was a carefully parsed press release that does not DESCRIBE the contents of those vital records. Obama can release these records. All he has to do is make the request. But he does not.


That these records, whatever they are, “verify” that Obama is a “natural-born American citizen” is Fukino’s interpretation, which is certainly open to argument. What does she mean by “natural-born American citizen” as compared to the requirement of the US Constitution, which is “natural born citizen of the United States?” Is Mexico, arguably, America? Yes, it is. Is Canada? Yes, it is. Is Argentina? Yes, it is.


FactCheck said:


A reporter for an Indianapolis television station filed this story shortly after Obama was elected in November, 2008. And in it Sarah Obama tells (again, through translators) of her grandson’s first visit to Kenya — when he was 25 years old.


TRUTH: That would have been 1986 or 1987, if this is correct. 1983, according to Sarah Obama in another story. 1985, according to Kezia. 1988, according to Obama and one of his biographers. Stories vary, as usual. See our timeline for more details.


FactCheck said:


It’s true that the rather poor image that the Obama campaign at first made public showed only one side of the document (the official signature was on the reverse) and the campaign unaccountably obliterated the number, for reasons never fully explained. But when we pressed the campaign for a better image, we were allowed to come to campaign headquarters and photograph it for ourselves, which we did.


TRUTH: The “rather poor” FactCheck photos show only one side of that purported document. Who exactly are “we?” Will those persons sign affidavits attesting, under oath, that what FactCheck wrote about visiting that document is absolutely true? Will FactCheck provide evidence that the persons who examined the document have the expertise to determine its authenticity? Did FactCheck ever ask the HDOH if they produced and certified that document? Did the HDOH ever state that they produced and certified that document? NO, they did not!


FactCheck said:


Had Trump looked at our 2008 article, he would see the signature stamp of Alvin Onaka, certifying that the document is “a true copy or abstract of the record on file,” issued to Obama June 7, 2007 as he was preparing to run for president.


TRUTH: Trump would have seen no such thing because FactCheck did not photograph the entire back side of the supposed document, making it impossible to validate their claims. There’s no context for the signature stamp and the date shown in their article. Why didn’t they photograph the entire back side?


FactCheck said:


Furthermore, the serial number (actually a “certificate” number) shows quite clearly in our photos. The number is 151 1961 – 010641, for whatever that’s worth.


TRUTH: It’s not worth much. Can they explain why the number is out of sequence with the numbers of the Nordyke twins? Did they even try to explain this discrepancy, as real factcheckers would?


FactCheck said:


We were amused to see Trump make a show recently of producing what he said was his own “birth certificate,” which wasn’t an official document and wouldn’t qualify him for a passport [a non sequitur]. “It took me one hour to get my birth certificate,” he told the conservative-leaning news site Newsmax [Newsmax is conservative? Who knew?]. “It’s inconceivable that, after four years of questioning, the president still hasn’t produced his birth certificate.”


TRUTH: FactCheck shouldn’t be amused; they were punked. Trump did this to demonstrate bias in the mainstream media, many of whom immediately jumped on Trump for presenting a non-official document. Ironic, considering they’ve never vetted Obama’s “document”, never asked to examine forensically that so-called document.






They might have asked Obama to request another COLB from Hawaii, to be certified and delivered directly to a media source that’s unimpeachable, although who that might be in the age of Obama, is hard to say.


They might have asked him, very simply, why he didn’t produce that document to any court of law. Can there be any explanation other than that it’s “embarrassing” or that it’s not legitimate so, therefore, it’s a crime to present it in court?


FactCheck said:


Trump’s “birth certificate” was actually an unofficial “Certificate of Birth” generated by Jamaica Hospital Medical Center (in Queens, N.Y. — not the island nation) stating that Trump was born there June 14, 1946. But because it was not “issued by the city, county or state” as required by the State Department, it does not constitute legal proof of citizenship sufficient to obtain a passport. When confronted with these facts, Trump later coughed up what he said was his official birth record issued by New York City’s Bureau of Records and Statistics. It is a certified photocopy of a “Certificate of Birth” signed by a physician. This one does appear to meet State Department requirements. And so does Obama’s.




TRUTH:


Trump showed the media an actual 3-D document, and so his evidence is very different from Obama’s lack of evidence. FactCheck and others in the media went for Trump’s bait…hook, line, and sinker.


Obama’s COLB is actually an unofficial digital image that would be accepted by NOBODY as proof of identity or birth. Try getting a passport by showing a digital image on a blog. A photoshopped image at that.


FactCheck said:
It’s also true that at least one news story (which was later corrected) incorrectly reported a different hospital as the birthplace, allowing Obama’s foes to engage in unfounded speculation that family members disagreed.


TRUTH: Multiple sources stated that Obama was born at Queen’s Medical. A student journalist interviewed Maya Soetoro. He reported that Queen’s Medical Center was the site of Obama’s birth. He has never, so far as we know, “corrected” that article. (FactCheck refers to another story.) It’s insulting to this student journalist to assume that he was lax in his research and reporting, simply because he was a student. There are (or were, prior to Internet scrubbing) MANY citations of Queen’s Medical as Obama’s place of birth.


FactCheck said:


It is also true that Kapi’olani can’t legally release individually identifiable health information without that person’s permission because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.


TRUTH: Kapiolani hospital posted a letter claiming that Obama was born there on a fundraising website, so they already released the information. Illegally? Why doesn’t FactCheck ask Obama to give Kapiolani permission to release the information, again?


FactCheck said:


It’s also very simple to make a false claim.


TRUTH: They should know.


FactCheck said:


Advertiser, Nov. 9, 2008: Advertiser columnist and former Star-Bulletin managing editor Dave Shapiro was not at either paper in 1961, but he remembers how the birth notices process worked years later when both papers were jointly operated by the Hawaii Newspaper Agency — which no longer exists. “Those were listings that came over from the state Department of Health,” he said. ‘”They would send the same thing to both papers.”


TRUTH: Mr. Shapiro is a FORMER employee of the newspaper and he admits that he did not know how the process worked in 1961. He spoke only about how it “worked years later.” While he says that some listings were sent from the Dept. of Health, he did not say that there could be no other source for these listings.


FactCheck said:


Our job is simply to assess evidence and call out falsehoods and factual mistakes when we find them.


TRUTH: Physician, heal thyself.


FactCheck said:


Nov. 1, 2008: Of all the nutty rumors, baseless conspiracy theories and sheer disinformation that we’ve dealt with at FactCheck.org during campaign 2008, perhaps the goofiest is the claim that Barack Obama is not a “natural-born citizen” and therefore not eligible to be president under the constitution.


TRUTH: If the “facts” that Obama himself has presented regarding his parentage are true, the FACT is that he is NOT a natural born citizen of the US and, therefore, is NOT eligible to be president under the Constitution.


FactCheck (a project of the Annenberg Foundation, for which Obama worked) and others are free to continue to ridicule, in Alinsky fashion, Donald Trump and all “birthers” who seek only to verify that every candidate for the presidency is eligible. Eligible to SERVE us, We the People. TRUTH will out.


We close with wisdom from Barack Hussein Obama II himself:


The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide.

FULL ARTICLE AND LINKS TO OTHER RELATED ARTICLES:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/13/birthers-correct-false-claims-against-trump/

ALSO CHECK OUT THIS ARTICLE

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html





KORAN BURNING IN IRAN BY TWO ANTI-REGIME FREE THINKERS

Bi-lingual (Persian and English) declarations read by the two youths fed up with the imposition of Islam on them and their country!

Title of video translated reads: "Koran burning by two free thinking youths"

Note how anti-Islam dissidents burn a book, while anti-Christian Moslems burn the Christians themselves NOT just a symbolic Bible, and burn and destroy multiple churches! With their actions justified and approved by their "religion"!

Islam is the only "religion" (in reality, a socio-political semi-secular and violence based legal system with religious facets - more than a religion) where if you do not agree with them they kill you! By order of their "holy" Koran!

ANY WONDER EVEN SOME MOSLEMS WANT TO BURN THE BOOK, NOT JUST SOME MINOR FLORIDA PASTOR?

OBAMA GIVING SYRIA POLITICAL IMMUNITY

http://alanpetersworld.blogspot.com/2011/04/syria-crushing-revolt-but-crumbling.html

AMERICAN TARP FUNDS CHANNELLED TO TERRORISTS

Bailout Money Goes To Libya & Nation of Islam


Where did the $700 billion dollars taxpayers were forced to cough up for the bailout go? Much of it to Al Qaeda and the Nation of Islam!

In the heat of the '08 financial meltdown, the Federal Reserve gave cash injections (i.e. bailouts) away to pretty much anyone who wanted them. To make sure the public wouldn't get mad, the Fed refused to disclose any information about who received the loans. Until now...

Secret fed documents have finally been made public and their content is shocking. Over the past few years Libyan banks have lent the Nation of Islam terrorist group MILLIONS OF DOLLARS!

Libya is also selling weapons directly to Al Qaeda. Unbelievable. And right now, American troops are launching air strikes in Libya and a Marine MEU (Marine exploratory unit) has been sent on the ground.

Before Obama signed the bailout bill he reassured the American people that the trillion dollar bailout would help regular folks - not Wall Street - and not foreign countries. And he certainly didn't mention it would help finance terrorists.

"We must work quickly in a bipartisan fashion to resolve this crisis to avert an even broader economic catastrophe. But Washington also has to recognize that economic recovery requires that we act, not just to address the crisis on Wall Street, but also the crisis on Main Street and around kitchen tables across America." - Barack H. Obama

Since when does sending money to terrorist supporters help Main Street? IT NEVER HAS AND IT NEVER WILL! Washington is skimming your bank account to pay for radical Islamic terrorist groups to wage war in the Middle East!

The American people are SICK of being lied to. We're SICK of Washington funneling our tax dollars into the coffers of dangerous radicals who HATE US! And we're sick of enabling people who want to HARM US!

THIS TIME, we can STOP them -- and it all starts with ORDERING AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE BAILOUT FUNDS! But Congress won't do that... unless YOU make them!

Tell Congress: Investigate The TARP Terrorist Ties

For over two years, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has been fighting to spare the crisis-ravaged banks from the embarrassment of revealing where they made their public loans.

The biggest bailout recipients weren't struggling American companies... they were foreign banks! According to Bloomberg News, "Foreign banks, accounting for at least 70 percent of the $110.7 billion borrowed during the week in October 2008 when use of the program surged to a record."

How does loaning money to foreign banks help the U.S.? IT DOESN'T! Obama seems to think that if America bows down to every country in the world eventually we'll all just get along.

WRONG! Obama's religion of globalization has FAILED MISERABLY. Rational people have known for years that the likelihood of the entire world's leaders sitting around holding hands is SLIM TO NONE.

Injecting bucket loads of cash into foreign banks is just another example of the TOTAL DISDAIN OBAMA HAS FOR AMERICA. Did Obama care enough to make hurting American companies his one and only focus? NO! Did Obama care enough to protect American interests instead of foreign banks? NO! Did Obama care enough to double-check and make sure our bailout money wasn't being given to dangerous Islamists? NO!

Why doesn't he care? Because America is "the bad guy!"

From bowing down to foreign leaders to publicly apologizing for all the "horrible" things America has done, Obama's presidency has been one giant insult to our country.

BUT - OBAMA AND THE LIBERALS THINK IT'S OKAY TO KNEEL DOWN TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND TERRORISTS--because they can just continue lending them money behind your back!

Isn't enough ENOUGH?


It's no secret that Obama's bailout scheme has been one of the biggest failures in history. But why haven't we heard about where the bailout money is REALLY going?

After dragging their feet for months, the Federal Reserve was finally forced to release the records. Keep in mind this was only after the court upheld FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed by Bloomberg LP (the parent company of Bloomberg New and Fox News.) So much for transparency in the Obama Administration.

The 29,000 pages of documents revealed seven key banks where the Fed has been "investing" our money.

Bank of Scotland
Bank of China
Societe Generale (France)
Two branches of Deutsche Bank AG Divisions (Germany)
Arab Banking Corporation (Libya)
Drexia Bank (Europe)
Depfa Bank (Germany)

There is NO REASON we need to be funding terrorist operations for evil dictators - directly or indirectly. It's time Obama gets to work and fixes the problems in America (his own country?) - instead of creating more abroad.

BUT WASHINGTON JUST DOESN'T GET IT -- but they WILL "get it," if the American people make their voices heard LOUD AND CLEAR again!

NATO has asked the U.S. to launch more air strikes against Libya. We must STOP lending money to terrorist harboring countries. The lives of our troops and the safety of American citizens depend on it.


Defend America,

Alan M. Gottlieb
Chairman, AmeriPAC

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Sunday, April 10, 2011

IT'S NOT THE WORDS BUT HOW YOU SAY IT

OBAMA CYNICAL HYPOCRISY - IT'S OK IF I, THE MORON MESSIAH, DO IT!

IT'S OK IF I RAISE THE CEILING  TO HANDLE THE MULTIPLE, POSSIBLY IRREPERABLE EXTRA TRILLIONS I PUT US INTO DEBT.

Another day, another hypocritical quote from Barack Obama. Today we head back to March of 2006 where the Senator was trying to score political points against then-President Bush. The Senate was voting on whether to increase the debt ceiling and then-Senator Obama was against it.

Of course, five years later, President Obama is pleading with Congress to allow him to push the United States further in debt. He is a hypocrite. He has no idea what he is doing. You've heard it all before, I'm sure.

Hypocrite





(Here is part of Congress's transcript from March 16, 2006):

Obama - Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America's debt problem.

The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies.

Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is "trillion'' with a "T.'' That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers. And over the next 5 years, between now and 2011, the President's budget will increase the debt by almost another $3.5 trillion...

(Alan Note: a 5-year  amount he has surpassed with our debt IN ONE YEAR!)

Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that "the buck stops here.'' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.

I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.


Good work, genius.

DEMOLITION DERBY AT WALMART

Driverless tractor with a locked steering wheel takes it out on cars parked at Walmart in Ontario, Canada.

Saturday, April 09, 2011

ARE THERE REALLY REBELS IN LIBYA? OR MOSTLY MOVIE MAGIC LIKE SHOWN BELOW

So far they appear to number a mere thousand or two rag-tag fighters with "flickering" ties to Al Qaeda and anti-USA terrorists as their leaders. All 30 or so of them. Wow! Thank you Obama.

And Egyptians are miserable with what has followed after Obama removed American ally President Mobarrak and handed the country to his buddies the Moslem Brotherhood and have started demonstrating in Tahrir Square against their worse plight than before. Thank you Obama.

Are we destroying Libya (forget Ghaddafi as a person for a moment) in order to oblige them to spend money on making infrastructure and equipment repairs and replacement using Western manufactured goods and services? Like Jimmy Carter and European countries set in motion by destroying the monarchy in Iran? And made staggering amounts of money out of the Islamic regime?

As does the USA with Obama giving special waivers to American companies to trade covertly with Iran despite the official sanctions and embargos. He exempts his friends from laws and our Constitution like a robber thug. Or more precisely a low life hoodlum who cares nothing about anyone but himself and his self-satisfaction.



And Obama's Socialist buddies are openly preaching revolution and rebellion inside  the USA!!!

Presumably, thus,  it will be OK FOR US TO TAKE UP ARMS AGAINST the oppression which quite likely will be rained down on us by Socialist or Marxist-Islamic Obama forces in the near future as his grip on America slips and he has to take ever more draconian and un-Consitutional actions to retain power.

Note: audio synchronization not good in all parts of the video.

MYSTERY SCAR ON OBAMA'S HEAD

SOMEONE IN OBAMA'S PAST CRACKED HIS SKULL FOR HIM.



While cynics jest Obama had a remote control for a teleprompter surgically inserted into his head or a receiver to hear orders from his masters,  others speculate more seriously that he was bled under Moslem custom as a child.

However, the scar looks much more like a residue of a blow or more likely two blows to the head by a narrowish, thick edged metal object. Something like a tire iron, though a sickle shaped scar  is what it seems to have been left behind.

 Or surgical removal of a large external  tumor at the crown of the head with further removal of a long root from which it grew.

Decide for yourself.





Friday, April 08, 2011

TRUMP SPEAKS OUT AGAIN

WOULD YOU VOTE FOR THIS MAN?

Says it like it is! Loves America.

WE REPORT - YOU DECIDE!

http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/04/is-obama-hiding-criminal-past-we-report.html

FRIDAY "Flu Feverish" ROUND UP - IRAN'S MULLAHS FURIOUS!!!

Screaming holy murder, Iranian regime Mullahs accuse a German firm for stealing their idea and threatening a financial jihad against the West, specially Germany!

They claim to have already packaged farts from the Supreme Leader for the faithful and were distributing his phlegm (spit) as a cure from Allah for all known ills along with sugar cubes he touches in passing each time he drinks tea. They say that cow gas is of lesser importance than the smell of the representative of Allah on earth and impinges on his supremacy.

In retaliation they threaten to kill all cows worldwide to prevent this insult to their supreme leader being spread any further. Cows are unbellievers and since they cannot pay their "jaziyah" tax to be allowed to live, and the Koran says "untaxed" unbelievers should be slain, so by Sharia law the slaughter of all cows is ordained by Allah.

They admit this would be a bit more difficult in cow worshipping India but note they are already in conflict over Kashmir so a bit more bloodshed loses significance in the face of this monstrous bovine insult.




Tins filled with the air sucked out of an ageing wooden stable, straw lined and filled with gas producing cattle has become an instant hit after it went on sale in Germany.

Managers of the 'Countryside air to go' project say their clients are mainly country people who have moved to the city and want to be reminded of home.

The cans cost £5 a pop and can be ordered from the web site www.stallduft.de

One advert boasts: 'Simply put your nose to the tin and peel back the lid for the authentic smell of the country'.

Designer Daniela Dorrer from the village of Adlkofen in Bavaria in Germany said: 'We hope to make people who miss the countryside happy and remind them of home.

'We are planning other smells such as horse, straw, pigs and manure. But most people miss the smell of the cows in the country, not really surprising as much of the smell is from cows.'

Cows' farting and burping have even been accused of causing global warming problems.

Just one cow gives off enough harmful methane gas in a single day to fill around 400 litre bottles, which is really bad for the environment, say experts.

Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/857242-cow-fart-cans-offer-authentic-smell-of-countryside#ixzz1Ixt72UVI

Meanwhile there is an Arab claim by a caller to a TV show that Her Royal Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II is in fact descended from Prophet Mohammad and is an "ahl-ul-beyt"  Hashemite.

Yes, they walk among us! You can see the reactions of the show hosts. (Sorry, no translation from Arabic on hand).



ALSO

Just as looney is the Democrat claim that when they failed last year - despite having a controlling majority in the House, the Senate and holding the White House - to pass ANY budget for 2011 that it's all the Republican's fault.

With TOTAL control of the government being insufficient for Democrats to forge and pass a budget under their watch, why would anyone expect the cost cutting Congress majority voted into office last November to compromise with them?

Specially as a growing opinion accuses the White House and their Democrat slaveys of actually PLANNING this shutdown in advance and passing no 2011 budget being part of the strategy to slam Republicans should (as they did) win a majority last November.



Hard to think Obama is smart enough (though his puppet masters are) to plan this strategy and tactically implement it - or that he and his radical buddies - some Socialist, some Marxist, some Islamist, some Anarchist  - would be so evil.

BUT, YES, they too walk among us. Look at the "budget pie" below.

And any wonder these Obama lunatics did not want the responsibility of formally passing a budget with these figures instead of having an "indeterminate slush fund" the Democrats controlled at the time and are now trying to keep in place?



GOOD GRIEF! HOW INSANE DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO RE-ELECT OBOZO?


Wednesday, April 06, 2011

SPECULATE WITH ME FOR A MOMENT

Selectively reading many if not all of the hundreds of Emails we get daily and browsing all sorts of sites and aggregators, today in a state of  feverish influenza, perhaps because of it, a very simple clarity has floated to the top.

Probably, you have realized this already, the reason the Democrats absolutely refuse to reduce spending and run up a mind-boggling deficit is to FORCE a tax increase to take place as we drown in debt and higher taxes APPEAR to offer the only solution.

Inept Obama has way overstepped on this and has almost certainly pushed us all past the point of no return - or past the point of rescue.

But that's OK for him and his goals. He cares little about what happens to the USA - unless it is negative and destrucitve of the American nation as we have known it and forces us into a mediocre, Socialist  European status in line with his Marxist-Islamist ideology. Which he can then control for his masters.

First, you have to remember a key point. Conflict, specially when violent, causes destruction and this has to  be repaired. Using up lots of money. So conflict creates debt and whoever controls and manages the debt, controls the conflict. Thus Obama's intentional deficit.

A key part of the Guadeloupe meeting set up by Jimmy Carter to overthrow the late-Shah of Iran was focused on the fact Iran was rising to a successful, prosperous modern nation. And would need less and less of the West's products as time went by.

On the contrary, when Carter had insisted the Shah sign a 50-year contract to sell oil to America for $8 (eight) a barrel - or else lose America  as a client, His Majesty responded that apart from not having known reserves to last half a century, he could not betray his country when each barrel of oil would be worth $1,000 as petrochemical in the plant he was buidling in Southern Iran went online.

And to sell Iranian oil inside the USA, he would simply and legally set up a string of National Iranian Oil gas stations in every city - North to South and East to West - inside America and sell it directly to the consumer.

So he had to go!

As destructively as possible for Iranian infrastructure, economy and any ability to continue into the modern age. Thus lots of revenue from sale of "repair" goods for the four instigators of Guadeloupe. America, Engand, France and Germany colluded to make this happen and use exiled looney tunes Marxist-Islamist "ayatollah Khomeini" as the wedge to make this happen.

Carter's very close and intimate ties to the Soviet Union (those tendencies of his still manifest in him today) brought them into the game and the revolution to remove the Shah and destroy the Iranian economy began inside the Soviet Embassy in Tehran, Iran. This center of operations began using MARXIST-ISLAMIST  Mojaheddin (MEK) to entice naive, gullible Moslems into their movement. (The details are a story of their own).

What is worth mentioning here is that the MEK leaders, spoke of Khomeini arriving in clerical robes but when the time was right, taking these off to show his red (Marxist) shirt underneath.

How do I know? I was there - and listened to intercepted phone calls at military intelligence and counter-intelligence headquarters and to informants we had infiltrated into the MEK with audio recorders. (Again, details are another story).

But what is applicable here to Obama is that I have already been through what he is doing to us and it's the same "Soviet" game  but on a different playing field. The Obama ideology and actions are unreal and strange to the "Joe Sixpack" of America but to those who have met or been involved with it in Soviet Republics, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, China and Islamic countries, were it not so globally apocalyptic, Obama's efforts are an almost boring replay. Same movie different actors.

Again what so many also miss are the "supporting actors" in the wings. Important ones but pure give-aways. Like the fact that manufacturers of freeze dried foods have received such huge orders from the Obama government that they are unable to offer products to private individuals who want to build up a food reserve. Nor supply their distributors, so they are cutting them loose. There is a six month wait to receive orders placed with freeze dried foods producers

Billion dollar purchases toward some 400 million  and more MRE (Meals Ready to Eat) type foods for emergencies and disasters with very long shelf life are in place have been made.

Enough for a million man civilian security force? Bought with your tax dollars for forces (specially martial law goons) who will be used gainst you if "you the people" fail to kiss Obambi's toes after he declares martial law?

Sound too feverish for you? Keep this item in your sights and as Glenn Beck says, do your own research, checking, cross referencing and form your own conclusions. Had you "been there and done that" elsewhere in your life you would not need my signposts. You'd be way ahead of me. And the "tip of the iceberg" you are being shown.

For a while I had a $2 million a month, clean company in the Middle East before the Mullahs confiscated it leaving me with a couple of suitcases and the urgency to get out of there alive. Now it looks as if "Oba-Hussein-Khomeini" is about to take this country away - not just from me - but from all of us. And is actively participating in the formation of a worldwide Caliphate under Sharia law. As evident with the every day destabilizing of North African and Middle Eastern states to hand them over to the Moslem Brotherhood. Or as in Libya to Al Qaeda and the Moslem Brotherhood.

Have you ever thought that the only difference between a Communist State and an Islamic one is the Marxists bow to the dictates of an all powerful, usually selfishly brutal  Komissar, whom they have to obey or perish and in Islam Allah replaces the Komissar.

Other than that they are both a socio-political system that demands and enforces their "rulings" through humans. One with their god version and the other without any deity.

Do you know how many conversations I have had with Christians of differing denominations which often ended with their insisting their Jesus was better than my Jesus! Is it any wonder that Shia and Sunni Moslems have similar conflicting mindsets? Or that Moslems hate Christians? Or that Moslems are not monolithic and have a multitude of sects, which fight and kill each other - not only Christians?

Having lived among Moslems in the Middle East for decades I can claim to know Moslems and cannot call Islam a religion instead of a socio-political system with religious laws rather than simply spiritual beliefs.

Britain has a Church of England, so if Islam is a "religion" then so is Britain!

Tuesday, April 05, 2011

CAREFULLY REASONED AND PRESENTED

part one



part two

FOUR MORE YEARS OF THIS? ARE YOU DEMENTED?

http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/04/four-more-years-of-this-you-kidding.html

SOCIALIST FAMILY TRADITION

http://alanpetersvideos.blogspot.com/2011/04/obamas-cousin-odinga-clears-way-to-his.html

FANTASY

Obama goes on a State visit to Israel .

While he is on a tour of Jerusalem , he has a fatal heart attack.

The undertaker tells the US diplomats: "You can have him shipped home for $1 million or you can bury him here in the Holy Land for $100".

The US diplomats go into a huddle and come back to the undertaker and tell him they still want Obama flown home.

The undertaker is puzzled and asks: "Why would you spend $1 million to get him home when it would be wonderful to be buried here in this religious country and you would only spend $100?".

One diplomat replied: "More than 2000 years ago a man died here, was buried here, and just 3 days later he rose from the dead. We simply can't take that risk".

IRAN CONFRONTING SAUDIS IN BAHRAIN

The accord reached between Saudi King Abdullah and the Bahraini monarch Hamas bin Isa Al Khalifa for the oil island's virtual annexation by Riyadh has so incensed Tehran that armed Iranian-Saudi clashes with the potential for all-out warfare may soon become unavoidable, debkafile's Iranian and Gulf sources estimate. Shiite-ruled Iraq would back Tehran in the first Shiite-Sunni collision to be sparked by the wave of unrest sweeping the Arab world - in contrast to the domestic discord raging in Libya and Yemen.

In the third week of March, debkafile reveals, King Hamad agreed to hand over to Riyadh control Bahrain's defense, external, financial and domestic security affairs. The Saudi king's son Prince Mutaib was confirmed by the two monarchs as commander of the Saudi and GCC forces invited to enter the tiny kingdom to put down the Shiite-led uprising, and it was agreed that Saudi Arabia would soon start building a big naval base on the island opposite the Iranian coastline.

The accord between the Saudi and Bahraini monarchs appeared for the first time in DEBKA-Net-Weekly 487 on March 25. It revealed then that King Hamad had allowed his realm to become the de facto 14th province of Saudi Arabia in order to block the Shiite uprising against him and its knock-on impact on Saudi Arabia's two million restive Shiites next door.
Neither Riyadh nor Manama has made the pact public. The Bahraini province of Saudi Arabia will differ from the other 13 in that it will not be governed by a Saudi prince like the others but by a member of the Al Khalifa royal family who will enjoy equal royal privileges with his Saudi peers.

Our sources report that in closed meetings with senior Saudi princes, King Abdullah explained the fundamental importance of this step for the kingdom's national security. He reported that Iran and its Hizballah surrogate were actively stirring up Shiite opposition in Manama as the first step toward fomenting a Shiite uprising against the Saudi throne.

On March 21, Riyadh resolved to expand the terms of reference of the Saudi-Gulf military intervention requested by King Hamad. Instead of just safeguarding the royal palace and strategic facilities against rampaging protesters, our sources report, it was decided to expand the mission to guarding Bahrain's borders against external attack – i.e. Iran or Iraq.

To this end, Saudi troop reinforcements have been pouring into Bahrain from the last week of March, including armored units and a variety of missiles. debkafile's military sources estimate that some 11,000 Saudi and United Arab Emirates boots have hit the ground in Bahrain since then.

Four days later, on March 25, Manama announced that planes taking off from Iraq or Lebanon would not be permitted to land in the kingdom, thereby cutting of the main route used by Iran and Hizballah to bring over intelligence agents and military instructors to aid the Shiite opposition.

The second important military step afoot at present is the transfer of Saudi fleet units from the Gulf of Oman and Red Sea to the military section of Bahrain's port, where the US Fifth Fleet has its headquarters and berths its ships. This is a provisional facility, to serve the Saudis until they finish building a port at Manama for parking their main Persian Gulf naval and marine command center, in response to the expanded facilities on the opposite shore of Iranian Revolutionary Guards' naval and marine raider units.

March 31, the Iranian parliament's security and foreign affairs committee strongly condemned Saudi military steps: "Saudi Arabia knows better than any other country that playing with fire in the sensitive Persian Gulf region is not in their interests," said the statement.

Since then, Iranian media have not stopped denouncing Saudi actions in Bahrain, likening them to Saddam Hussein's 1990 conquest of Kuwait which triggered the first Gulf War against Iraq. Riyadh was even accused of accepting clandestine US and Israeli support.

Then, Saturday, April 2, Iraq's Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki chipped in by reviling US Middle East policy as discriminating among the popular movements in motion against the different Arab dictatorial regimes: "Whatever decision is made on Libya should be applied to any government that suppresses its people with iron and fire," he said.

Sunday, April 3, the threatening recriminations coming from Tehran and Baghdad prompted the Gulf Cooperation Council to hold a special foreign ministers' meeting. It passed a resolution which "severely condemned Iranian interference in the internal affairs of Bahrain in violation of international pacts."

Language this blunt has never before been heard from GCC leaders. It is attributed by our Gulf sources to Saudi King Abdullah's adamant resolve to challenge Tehran headon on every issue affecting the Gulf region's security, to the point of Saudi military intervention when called for – even at the risk of precipitating an armed clash between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

The Islamic Republic finds itself confronted with its first forthright, no-nonsense challenge: If it backs down in the face of Saudi military activism, the Shiite communities across the region will conclude that Iran is both unable and unwilling to stand up for the Shiite-Arab revolt against Sunni regimes – whether in Bahrain, in other Gulf emirates or in Yemen and Lebanon.

Iraqi Prime Minister al Maliki faces the same quandary with regard to Iraqi Shiites who consider Bahraini coreligionists to be an integral part of their tribes and clans.

It is taken for granted by Saudi Arabia, Gulf capitals and Western military and intelligence observers that Tehran has been pushed into a corner from which it cannot afford to pull back from its overarching commitment to sponsor Bahrain's Shiites. The Iranians are therefore expected to send their Bahraini Shiite networks into terrorist action against Saudi military targets very soon. Riyadh is already braced for these assaults - and not just in Bahrain but in other GCC states including Saudi Arabia proper.

They will not go unanswered; hence the dire predictions among seasoned observers that armed hostilities between Shiite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia may at some point become unavoidable.

Hat tip Debka

ISLAMIC TERRORISM

http://terrornewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/04/islamic-instruction-manual-detailed.html

LONG BUT WORTH THE READ

OBAMA DARED NOT PUT "ALLAH" ON NEW COIN - SO REMOVES "GOD"

Please help do this. Refuse to accept these when they are handed to you.

I received one from the Post Office as change and I asked for a dollar bill instead.
The lady just smiled and said 'way to go' , so she had read this caveat.

Please help out..our world is in enough trouble without this too!!!!!


U.S.Government New Dollar Coins

You guessed it: 'IN GOD WE TRUST' IS GONE!!!

If ever there was a reason to boycott something, THIS IS IT!!!!

DO NOT ACCEPT THE NEW DOLLAR COINS AS CHANGE

Together we can force them out of circulation..

MEANWHILE

Democrats, refusing to hear of SPENDING cuts are trying to scare us with baseless claims millions of Seniors will go hungry, 70,000 children will die, the sky will fall!

YET they cry wolf while avoiding to point out that the Republican cuts are:

A mere 3.3% of our yearly deficit, 1.05% of our  2011 budget   and ONLY 0.28% of our ENTIRE OBAMA (no, not Bush)  DEFICIT!


Such TINY percentages qualify as accounting errors not deficit reductions with any meaning!


We (the Obama administration on our behalf - without our consent, even against our wishes) spent THREE times what we took in over the last couple of months. And on average, spend EIGHT times our revenues on a continuing basis!

To put this in family context, if you  earn $1,500 a month you would be spending $12,000 a month and expecting to continue doing this without any consequences to you and your family.

It makes sense to (now) millionaire Obama, who will disappear with his millions when the going gets tough and set himself up in some Islamic country - including Kenya, declare himself the Moslem enabler he always was demanding reward, and not even think about - other than with SATISFIED pride - at the destruction and misery he left behind in the USA.

At least under the late-Shah, General Pakravan drained his budgets to buy this Paris location for the Imperial Embassy to present the country as it was then and (unlike Obama's legacy) left behind something far too worthy of the flea-ridden clerics who rule Islamic Iran with ruthless, bloody supression. The worst of the late-Shah's critics accusations against his regime make him appear like a choir boy compared to this bunch.

AND, in retrospect,  far less corrupt than the Obama Chicago style criminal administration and the radical Marxist-Islamic and Union thugs he put in charge of America today.

Sure there was corruption in His Majesty's government, I was there and saw some of it but by contrast there was his deep love of country and pragmatic decisions to bring it out of the 18th century into the modern world.

When one of his key Ministers was found to have embezzled some $20 million, everyone expected him to be fired. And protested when he was not.

In a private explanation, His Majesty explained that the fast expanding country was very short of trained and experienced people to fill senior posts and a country, like a large corporation, needed such people to function efficiently and effectively.

"Would you prefer me to throw him in prison for a few years, the most the law would allow,  and then have him leave the country and enjoy the fruits of his theft? Or would you rather I kept him at his desk, showing up every morning at six in the morning, with my sword of Damocles over his head and use his decade of experience to advance the needs of the nation in a professiona manner? And with his knowing I know and can prove it, he will be financially correct in all future projects. Something I cannot presume would be the case with his replacement who might not have the same restrictions on his actions."

While noting that $20 million was a huge amount "out of context", it was a drop in the bucket out of the national budget and could be (ruefully) considered "training cost" of a capable senior official, who can save us far more than that amount in doing a good job.

Here are some photos of the Paris Embassy:

(Persian caption praising General Pakravan, who originally saved Khomeini's life in 1964 after the latter was condemned to death by the courts and in 1979 the General was immediately taken to the roof of his house and executed by the rabid Mullah to prevent  a host of negative secrets about him being disclosed - including his not having a drop of Iranian-Persian blood in his veins. See http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/who-is-ayatollah-khomeini.html which because of Archiving space saving formatting appears as one long paragraph).

اينجا سفارت ايران در شماره 4 خيابان اينا پاريس است. ببنيد اين ملا صفت ها واقعا لياقت اين ساختمان را دارند. اين ساختمان را تيمسار پاکروان با يک خون دلی خريد و آباد کرد ولی همين ملايان از نخستين کسانی که تيربارانش کردند همين تيمسار حسن پاکروان بود. روحش شاد و روانش قرين شادی باد... يادش آن شادروان و خدماتش بخير..










FLEA RIDDEN, FLOOR SITTING,  CLERICAL INHERITORS OF PERSIAN GLORY THEY DESTROYED
When foreigner Khomeini invaded and took power in Iran, he banned desks and chairs in government offices, saying he had sat on the floor all his life so his officials should follow suit!

To provide focus on his similarity to clueless Obama, he insisted that his national budget was on a piece of paper IN HIS POCKET, whereas for previous, real budgets, just the INDEXES had to be carried inside two LARGE specially made briefcases in which they were taken to the Shah's Parliament by Prime Minister Amir Abbass Hoveidah for the previous 13-years before this blight (like Obama on the USA) hit the Persian nation!

Other than showering more frequently, there are huge mental similarities between Obama and Khomeini, just more restrictive laws in the USA toward implementing thuggish Obama desires.

Monday, April 04, 2011

OBAMA ASSOCIATES COVER UP CHICAGO SEX ABUSE

LONG - DETAILED - MUST READ!

Does this cover up have anything to do with allegations that Obama has a criminal past and this could be partly the reason he hides all his personal information?

Donald Trump has decided to run for President and knows lots of important people all over the world, so we could be a big step closer to the truth about Obambi.




http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2699722/posts
DOCUMENT LEAK INCLUDED

GHADDAFI ENDORSING OBAMA

http://alanpetersvideos.blogspot.com/2011/04/ghaddafi-endorses-obama.html

oops!
EJECT!  EJECT!  EJECT!


OBAMA'S DEEP IGNORANCE SURFACES AGAIN!

HEY, OBOZO! CANADA HAS A PRESIDENT?

NO THEY DONT! NOR, based on your inability to govern DOES THE USA!

All you know how to do is to spout falacious, ignorant "hopey, changey" empty rhetoric in campaign fashion.

And take incredibly expensive tourist trips around the country and world at our expense in between your excessive golfing, while you avoid the challenges our country faces and YOU so assiduously IGNORE. Because you have no clue how to do your job and know it.

No wonder you have quickly declared an early run for the presidency to make yourself feel useful to your narcissistic self and pretend to be something you are not nor have the skills to ever be.

You appear to be "hopey" that the naive fools who elected you in the first place are still as stupid as before and have not shifted to "changey" after watching you blunder around like a headless chicken for a couple of years pretending there is some reason to your utter lunacy. Other than the final destruction by YOU of America as a world power by draining our lifeblood to reward your radical friends and punish your enemies, who are real American patriots.


Sunday, April 03, 2011

MARIA THE GOOSE - IS SHE A LOVE FROM A PREVIOUS LIFETIME?

OBAMA'S TIES TO TERRORISTS ENTERING USA POLICY

http://alanpetersworld.blogspot.com/2011/04/obamas-policy-comes-from-terrorists-and.html

ARIZONA HARLEY SEAT

OBAMA INFLICTION OF MISERY ON THE WORLD CONTINUES

While listening to a Persian broacaster in London berating the Islamic Iranian regime as the worst on earth, I came across the claims assessed to Oba-Hussein. Apart from the lack of bloodshed here in the USA, rivers of it on Obama's hands elsewhwere like Libya, Egypt, Syria, his regime is easily as thuggish and brainless or worse than the Islamic Iranian one.

And he really does not care. Worst case scenario he will take a one way family holiday to visit Kenya, having already transfered his millions overseas and bask like the king he believes he is in the adulation of the Kenyans and have them build him and maintain a pefect golf course and build him a palace. All at the expense of the Kenyan people not out of his own pocket. While continuing to turn his back on his poor relatives like his slum dwelling brother who has to ge by on $20 A YEAR! While his usurper brother spends $120 a pound on Japanse Kobe beef steak at his White House dining table. Again at our expense not his own.

Meanwhile - slightly dated subject but an interesting speculation since at the time Iran was threatening Saudi Arabia.



OBAMA's  IDIOTIC CLAIMS (he thinks we are stupid enough to believe them, though the fools who voted for him might still be or the freeloaders guzzling at the government trough he has put out for them):

Gallup Daily tracking finds that 20.3% of the U.S. workforce was underemployed in March -- a slight uptick from the relatively flat January and February numbers. A rise in the percentage of part-timers wanting to work full time (from 9.2% to 9.9%) is responsible for the March increase in underemployment. He claims there is a drop in unemployment on the technicality of removing over TWO MILLION unemployed people from the work force!

Read carefully to understanding the SPIN he has put on all that is wrong under his leadership!

''America is on the mend. My 2012 budget is a responsible approach that puts the nation on a path to live within our means so we can invest in our future. That's right, we're forging ahead, escaping this sub-prime malaise. Ben will fully implement QE2 – the latest $600 billon bout of money-printing - following the $1.7 trillion program already completed! Wasn't that easy how we monetized the debt (deficit financing now is the Fed buying treasuries).

Let me tell you, we are the world's largest debtor, with federal liabilities of $9.1 trillion. And there's much more to come.

But we have no reports today that my plan is the most irresponsible spending plan in our lifetimes or that it will be worsening our fiscal nightmare. We also have no reports of several counties in America with home vacancy rates above 55%. And no reports of Vice President Biden performing financial castration on companies extracting profits from their business activities.

I'm proud to announce the biggest single thing the federal government does these days is cut checks. A record amount of government payouts -- including Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance -- now make up more than a third of total wages and salaries of the US population. And here's another whopping-big check soon to be cut. I'm sending Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to Honolulu to discuss a $5.5 billion commuter rail project. That'll rev up this economy for those union Democrats in Hawaii. And at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the federal government has $1 trillion in an untapped Piggy Bank.

Looking back at the federal deficit for February 2011, it marks the 29th straight month the government has run in the red — a modern record. If we divide that monthly record of $223 billion by the 28 days of February we get $7.9 billion in new debt PER DAY!

So the Senate Democrats touting their $4.7 billion in ANNUAL spending cuts as fiscally responsible, or the GOP's trumpeted budget cuts, are equivalent to the amount the debt increased in any given 13 hour period of any day in February.

By the way, my (Obama's)  Libyan war will also wipe out any cuts -- in truth the cost of a Happy Meal could wipe out your budget cuts.

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) says the Federal budget may not be balanced for 20 years. Steny should know, he helped dig the hole. But here's where we really shine... Surging oil prices along with my new spending plan gives me evidence that we, the world's biggest oil importer, are fit, healthy and ready to spend our way 'out of this.

I don't care what you have to say as long as I can continue to add new debt long enough to get us past the point of no return.

With regard to healthcare, let me repeat:

your guaranteed Medicare benefits won't change. First of all, if you've got health insurance, you like your doctors, you like your plan, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan. (NOT!)

And finally, as to GE's zero tax liability... it's a legitimate demonstration of the positive reinforcement needed to inspire businesses to cooperate in the implementation of my agenda for change. There have to be incentives to distinguish between our friends and enemies when it comes to policy. Presidents going back to FDR have used the IRS and its authority over taxes to help provide the type of incentives that corporations can appreciate.

Now please go back to your business as usual, and just relax. When we see a flicker of a problem, we'll say something.''

Like the "flicker" of Al Qaeda commanders running the Libyan rebels we support?

(hat tip BobP)

QUOTE FROM A DEMOCRAT LEGISLATOR

Hope and Change.... Tragic!


When the tipping point exposes the country as bankrupt these socialists will eventually declare an emergency - a WWII style 'bond drive' - and start collecting private savings and retirement accounts, etc., as a down-payment on the debt.

Appealing to a patriotic sense of duty.

That is essentially what happened to Weimar Germany and Austria after WWI leading up to the 1923 collapse.

Citizens rushed to buy government 'war bonds' as a safe haven against other dwindling investments, only to have the war bonds collapse in value as the mark and kroner rapidly depreciated in value as the government's printed more and more money to cover their debts.

The result being that people had no assets (economic resources) and zero purchasing power.

Is this misery he has imposed on us any better than the bloodshed in Islamic Iran? Will the "life" he offers be worth living when he gets done with us?

BTW an Iranian official in a single town of Isfahan has declared there are 138 people scheduled for execution in his town. They are averaging one execution every EIGHT hours in Iran.

Eight  Bahai leaders, aleady in prison for the last three years have been sentenced to 20-year prison terms for being non-Moslems (or following a strange version of Islam) though they were accused of spying - a catch-all accusation like drug dealing or activity against the State.