Sunday, May 18, 2008
Saturday, May 17, 2008
LIFE IN DUBAI
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Monday, May 12, 2008
DO YOU REALLY WANT THIS MIND SET IN THE WHITE HOUSE
White Clinton Socialist Communist trash versus black Obama militants leaves only McCain as an escape from all this as the least of all evils, not the best of the best.
Check the video below and stop worrying about who the Democrat candidate will be - just vote against either of them - or reap what you sow. And you will NOT enjoy it.
Click on graphic for a larger picture
PREPARING FOR WAR?
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
ISLAMIC IRAN'S DEPARTMENT/MINISTRY OF TERRORISM MOIS/VEVAK
Tuesday, May 06, 2008
SLAUGHTERED IN PUBLIC
When we previously posted this picture of Islamic Iranian "suppression" police forces, who are totally immune from prosecution, many wondered what they would do with that specially made blade many of them carry to replace the tire irons they used to wield to maim and kill. The brief video at the end of this article shows EXACTLY how they use it to oppress, suppress and terrorize their own populace. So all you Dhimmis, take a good look at what you are encouraging and promoting and supporting in the name of backing "Islam".
ISLAMIC IRANIAN AGENTS SLAUGHTER A 13-YEAR OLD IN PUBLIC AS PART OF THEIR RELIGION OF PEACE!
(brief but horrible video at the end of this post)
Also YouTube pulled another video spread by Iranian blogs and Emails , showing a young Iranian Kurd who was shot by an Islamic Regime paramilitary patrol and was lying on a dusty, unpaved road with blood pouring from his head and mouth.The uniformed , unkempt "troops" came over to look at him and began discussing if anyone of them had plastic sheeting in their vehicles, looking lost as to what to do next.
Finally someone finds and brings plastic sheeting and as they approach, the "dead" youth's head moves and blood gushes from his mouth.
"He's still alive!" one of them exclaims.
Since the blood has pooled all around his head and they are considering putting him in one of their vehicles, they roughly lift his upper body by his shirt and try clumsily to drag the plastic under his head and wrap if around the bloody and bleeding area.
They then find another piece of canvas and drag him onto it and to the side of the road.
Then they decide to LEAVE him there and not take his now dead body with them. One of them brings a very large UNITED NATIONS light blue flag with he UN emblem imprinted on it and they wrap the body in it and drag it further to the side of the road and depart.
What a pity that YouTube removed this evidence.
Why they would have the large UN flag with them at all is a mystery! Or use it as a shroud!
Were they pretending to be part of some UN forces? The Mullah regime stops at nothing as the video below so vividly shows. Or were they trying to blame the killing on the UN?
Would accusing the UN of corruption and bias by helping anti-Israeli activity as it did in the recent war in Lebanon by providing constant information on Israeli troop movements to the Hezbollah be unjustified? Read on.
BY DAY, Awad al-Qiq was a respected teacher and headmaster at a United Nations school in the Gaza Strip.
By night, he built rockets for Islamic Jihad.
The Israeli air strike that killed the 33-year-old last week also laid bare his apparent double life and embarrassed a UN agency that has long had to reject Israeli accusations that it has aided and abetted guerrillas fighting the Jewish state.
Students and colleagues, as well as UN officials, denied any knowledge of Qiq's work with explosives. And his family denied he had any militant links, despite a profusion of Islamic Jihad posters at his home.
But militant leaders allied to the enclave's ruling Hamas group have hailed him as a martyr who led Islamic Jihad's "engineering unit" – its bomb makers. They fired improvised rockets into Israel in response to his death.
Qiq's body was wrapped in an Islamic Jihad flag at his funeral, posters in his honour still bedeck his family home and a notice posted on the school gate declared that Qiq, "the chief leader of the engineering unit", would now find "paradise".
The poster was removed soon after reporters visited the Rafah Prep Boys School, run by the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees. Staff there said yesterday that UNRWA officials had told them not to discuss Qiq's activities.
No-one from the UN attended the funeral or has paid their respects to the family, relatives said.
The Israeli army said its 30 April attack at Rafah, close to the Egyptian border, hit a workshop used for making rockets and other improvised weaponry. An Israeli intelligence source said Qiq was involved in developing rockets and mortars.
Yet Qiq, a physics graduate with eight years' experience of teaching at UNRWA schools, was also described by colleagues as a rising star in education. Relatives said he was promoted to run the school last year, with the title of deputy headmaster.
The Qiq case highlights the complexities of life among the 1.5 million people of the Gaza Strip, where close to half voted for Hamas in 2006.
Hamas fighters join Islamic Jihad in campaigns of rockets and suicide bombing in pursuit of a stated goal of recovering all Palestinian lands lost to Israel.
Qiq's high profile as a public figure is unusual enough to cause considerable interest among those in Gaza who were surprised by the funeral arrangements.
Sympathies for guerrillas, who number in the tens of thousands, are widespread, despite Israeli efforts to discredit Hamas and its allies by choking food and fuel supplies.
That tactic has also set Israel and UNRWA at odds. The agency, set up to care for Palestinian refugees, has spoken out against what it calls collective punishment of civilians.
Surrounded by Islamic Jihad mourning posters at the family home, Qiq's sister Naima insisted: "He's only a teacher and head of the school. School was his life. He had no time to work with Islamic Jihad." Other family members nodded in agreement.
At the school, a 17-year-old who gave his name as Shadi read a poster for his former teacher and said simply: "Nobody knew."
At the bombed-out workshop two miles from the school, damaged cars can be seen through now-locked gates. Abu Mohammed, 35, said he found Qiq dying inside after helicopters fired a missile at the building.
Relatives recalled with pride that Qiq had met John Ging, UNRWA's Gaza operations director. But while fellow teachers had come to pay their respects, they saw no UN representative.
Qiq's sister said his wife and five children were worried by the lack of news on any pension payment: "Awad did a lot for UNRWA," she said. "The family hoped UNRWA would support them."
Zero tolerance on politics
ISRAEL has long alleged that militants use UN Relief and Works Agency vehicles and facilities. The UN has denied those charges, although some UNRWA employees have had prominent political roles in groups like Hamas – such as teacher Saeed Seyam, who was the interior minister in the Hamas-led government elected in 2006.
Some western officials say UNRWA, as one of the biggest employers in the Gaza Strip, simply reflects the society it serves.
But donors such as the United States, which fund the body's work, insist on vetting procedures to ensure their cash does not reach groups they class as terrorists – such as Islamic Jihad.
A UNRWA spokesman, Christopher Gunness, said: "We have a zero-tolerance policy towards politics and militant activities in our schools."
But he added: "Obviously, we are not the thought police and we cannot police people's minds."
STARTLING VIDEOS (IN ENGLISH) ABOUT ISLAM - YOU DECIDE
Monday, May 05, 2008
Sunday, May 04, 2008
REGIONAL ROILING WATERS - IMPENDING DOOM?
Iraq, a focal point, not the sole one, keeps many awake at night and begets increasing anger in Coalition Forces, specially American generals as we lose soldiers to Islamic Iran Qods Forces practically overt activity and operations in Iraq.
Setting aside the global level activities of finding more incentives for Iran to stop nuclear weapons grade refinement of uranium, which meets with great skepticism from Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, whose State Department once again labels Islamic Iran as the greatest promoter of terrorism in its annual report, evidence appearing that Iran is possibly only months away from nuclear weaponry puts a different slant on everything.
The fact that Switzerland and Italy have cut private side gas and oil deals with Islamic Iran in contravention of United Nation sanctions, that China might feel obliged to send in forces to protect 300 Billion oil/gas contracts with Iran, that Russia is being offered a revival of two long dead bilateral agreements by long, long gone regimes at both ends, which would allow them to send in their armies into Iran if foreign troops were to invade, all bode ill for the region.
The fact that Al Qaeda in Iraq and renegade, Iraqi Shiite leader Moqtada Al-Sadr, under house arrest in the Iranian holy city of Ghom, issue an almost verbatim statement within one week of each other points to a confluence - not in Iraq - but in Iran, where many senior Al Qaeda leaders shelter and operate under the generous kindness of the Mullahs.
The often displayed threat Mullah missiles and military capacity pose for oil producing neighbors across the Persian Gulf and Saudi Arabian oil fields have pushed some of them to tacitly "co-operate" with Islamic Iran, changing the natural balance of power in the region - based on fear of a crazy, suicidal Iran with Hojatieh inspired leaders like Ahmadi-Nejad in place.
Still within Iraq, we run into competing splinters of power such as the factions within Al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, many of whom have acquiesced to his cease-fire - while others have definitely not and have drawn the ire of the Iraqi government onto themselves. And triggered the house arrest of Al-Sadr in Ghom, in case Iran needs to give him up as a negotiating pawn.
Clouding this picture further are intransigent Ba'athist SHI'ITE supporters of Saddam Hussein, who received tons of money while he was in power and alive and now have their own agenda - which does not favor Iran nor Al-Sadr.
Futhermore they have woven themselves into American society in fairly significant numbers as doctors, professors and other professions and careers, with ample funds they received in the past.
Infiltrators have many shapes and forms not just those who wiggle into the apparently naive FBI or CIA or government agencies, who fail miserably in background checks. And willingly fall prey to the Abbas Fakhravars and Akbar Ganjis, the Islamic regime in Iran sends our way with nefarious intent.
Continuing with Iraq, a high level Iraqi delegation, with Iranian Qods Force bodyguards from inside Iraq are visiting Ghom to meet with Al-Sadr and the Iranian Mullahs. They carry with them irrefutable proof of Iranian meddling in Iraqi affairs and samples of Iranian made weapons and EFPs (Explosively Formed Penetrators) being smuggled into Iraq and being used by the Mahdi Army - despite Al-Sadr's cease fire order - to kill Americans and Iraqi citizens.
Internal strife within the ruling clerics in Iran muddy events as they jockey for position and power. Recent parliamentary elections, which President Ahmadi-Nejad had hoped would stack his supporters in place and ensure his relection as President went very badly for him.
Hardliners supported by Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei and a new anti Ahmadi-Nejad faction of Larijani and Ghalibaf, found themselves an absolute power block in an "election" where the 65% turnout was put to the lie by 13,000 leaked Interior Ministry documents as having in reality only been 35% of eligible voters nationwide.
Where statistics like the 800,000 votes for hardliner Hadad Adel were in fact only 300,000 and half a million votes were gratuitously tagged on to cover a miserable showing.
Where Khamenei has begun grooming his son-in-law to take over the post of President in the next so-called "elections", which - as has been seen in the Islamic democracy - are in fact "appointments" to positions by those in power. Specially as they can invalidate any candidate they do not like or who might, just might, win something.
Notably, some 90 sitting Majliss (parliament) deputies were banned from running for their own seats this time around as they did not always vote the way Khamenei wanted them to.
Thus, internal "sectarian" strife inside Iraq, internal "sectarian" strife inside Islamic Iran and rapidly destabilizing regimes in Eqypt, Syria, Lebanon and Palestininian areas, create an invitation to chaos and perhaps impending doom.
The Israeli Mossad is meeting with MI6 to provide details of Iran's nuclear capability being ready in perhaps a matter of months. Other intelligence and security agencies have begun to exchange information and military strategies to deal with this whole mess.
AND how to contain the consequences within the USA and Europe after any attack on Iran. Remember the Mullahs are in charge of a homicide nation as opposed to simply individual suicide bombers who will attack our malls.
In Paris, Iranian opposition groups under the umbrella of Reza Pahlavi, the late Shah's son, have met with French authorities to try to establish a potential administration to take control after the fall of the Mullahs. Sadly some 50 participants at the event are also riddled with their own selfish "sectarian" divisions and differences rather than flexibility to help run the country.
All in all, Islamic Iran and the Mullahs who run it, whether the Hojatieh 12th Imam suiciders or the various others like Najafabadi, who has declared against the import of toys, specially Western dolls like Barbi and others as corrupting the Islamic fervor of the populace, need to be removed once and for all for the world to try to heal and re-establish a modicum of sanity that Islam has recently sickened in us like a brain cancer.
Slowly, methodically sharia creeps into a free society like ours.
Place a frog into boiling water and it will immediately jump out.
Place a frog into cold water and it will swim peacefully while the heat is added to the boiling point - dead frog.
Isn't this exactly how the evil aspects of Islam enter and take control of our lives as our Dhimmis deny and support this yet another form of infiltration, by a sworn enemy?
Saturday, May 03, 2008
DESPERATE IRAN GETTING THEIR BUTTS KICKED IN IRAQ
Friday, May 02, 2008
MIND BOGGLING INGREDIENTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COCAINE
U.S. GOVT. INFESTED WITH TERRORIST MOLES
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
RUSSIAN TROOPS IN IRAN? GOG & MAGOG BIBLICAL PROPHESY?
ALSO : pictures of Reza Pahlavi appearing in Iran - a good start .
http://alanpetersvideos.blogspot.com/2008/04/posters-of-reza-pahlavi-appearing-in.html
Other than everyone and everything there except the Jamkaran well down which the teenage 12th Imam disappeared some 1,400 years ago and needs to be enticed back with bloodshed, suffering, death and misery to redeem the world! READ ON FOR A PRESSING REASON TO REMOVE THE MULLAHS BEFORE THEY OFFICIALLY REVIVE DEAD TREATIES WITH THE SOVIETS. and finally hand the country to Russia - lock, stock and oil barrel. Why is the leadership in Tehran anxious to give Russia the right to land troops in Iran?By Amir Taheri
The question is not fanciful. The Islamic Republic is conducting a devious campaign to prepare public opinion for that eventuality. The message is relayed through deliberately vague terms that diplomats understand immediately while the general public does not. The device is to revive two treaties that most students of Iranian history thought were dead and buried long ago. The first is the 1921 Treaty that the government of Sayyed Ziauddin Tabatabai, soon after coming to power in a putsch, signed with Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik regime. At the time the Bolsheviks had some troops in the Iranian province of Gilan on the Caspian Sea, supporting a rebellion led by a leftist mullah known as Mirza Kuchak Khan of the Jungle. At the same time, the British were using Iranian territory to ferry troops and materiel to anti-Bolshevik nationalist forces in Transcaucasia. Under the treaty, Lenin agreed to cancel the debts Iran had accumulated towards the Tsarist Empire. He also undertook to withdraw his troops from Gilan. The treaty revised relations in the Caspian Sea, granting Iran greater rights of fishing and navigation. That amounted to a generous gesture towards Tabatabai’s new government that, still fragile, needed all the good news it could get in relations with the major powers. Nevertheless, as always when a weak nation makes a pact with a much larger neighbour, the treaty had a sting in its tail. It gave the Russians the right to land troops in Iran when and if troops of any other foreign power arrived in Iran. At the time it was Britain that Lenin had in mind. For his part, Tabatabai wanted to use the threat of Russian military intervention as a means of forcing the British to end their military presence in Iran. However, in one of those twists of history, the treaty was never used for its original purpose. The British soon abandoned their anti-Bolshevik allies whom they found too weak to defeat Lenin’s new empire. Lenin, for his part, believing he could add Iran to his empire through ideological agitation rather than conquest, abandoned the Mullah of the Jungle and withdrew the Soviet troops. In 1941, however, Soviet troops, this time under Stalin, invaded Iran. The legal pretext was the 1921 treaty. Soviet propaganda claimed that the presence of a few German military experts and, possibly, spies, in Tehran amounted to a foreign hostile force on Iranian soil. Reza Shah, the Iranian monarch, had refused to kick the Germans out, possibly in the hope that Hitler would defeat Russia and Britain, Iran’s two principal enemies for 150 years. Within days of the Soviet invasion, backed by a British invasion of Iranian territory from Iraq, Reza Shah was forced into exile. The new Iranian government, under Prime Minister Muhammad-Ali Forughi, had to accept the legality of the invasion under the 1921 Treaty. Nevertheless, both sides felt that a new treaty was needed to determine the status of Soviet troops in Iran. Negotiations were railroaded at top speed, with the British supporting the Soviets in the name of their alliance against Nazi Germany. The Iranian side, weak and disorganised in a country under foreign occupation, protested. But, with Soviet and British guns pointed at its head, it ended up signing the 1941 Treaty. The new treaty, recalling that of 1921, reaffirmed the right of the USSR to send troops to Iran if and when Moscow felt it was threatened by a third power’s presence in Iran. The two treaties entered Iran’s diplomatic memory as black moments in history. Abbas-Ali Khalatbari, Iran’s Foreign Minister between 1971 and 1978, described them as “two bleeding wounds in our heart.” In 1946, as Stalin’s troops were forced to leave, the Shah declared the two treaties “dead and buried”. But, facing a strong Soviet-backed Communist Party and its allies, he was too weak to ask the parliament to formally cancel the treaties. In 1963, the Soviets launched a campaign to revive the treaties. They claimed that the arrival in Iran of American military instructors, invited to help build the new Iranian air force, amounted to “a foreign hostile presence” under the terms of the treaties. The Iranians ignored the Soviet campaign and, on a number of occasions, announced a unilateral cancellation of the treaties. The most significant official move to cancel the treaties came after the fall of the Shah. In 1980, Ibrahim Yazdi, a US citizen of Iranian origin serving as Khomeini’s Foreign Minister, solemnly announced that the newly created Islamic Republic did not recognise the treaties. A diplomatic seesaw battle ensued in which the Iranian side stood by Yazdi’s declaration. The matter rested in limbo, with most experts agreeing that the treaties were dead, until the fall of the Soviet Empire in 1991. After that neither side mentioned the treaties, presumably because both agreed that accords between two fallen regimes could not apply in radically changed circumstances. So, one can imagine the surprise caused by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s decision to suddenly start speaking of the two treaties as if they were still valid. He and his aides, including Foreign Minister Manuchehr Motakki, have mentioned the treaties with regard to the status of the Caspian Sea and the application by the Islamic Republic to join Russia and China in the Shanghai Group, an informal framework for security cooperation. Motakki has gone further by suggesting that Iran abandon the Persian name for the Caspian Sea, that is to say the Sea of Mazandaran, and adopt the Russian name mentioned in the treaties. To sweeten Russia further, Motakki has also hinted at abandoning Iran’s demand for a 20 per cent share in the Caspian’s resources, settling, instead, for just over 11 per cent. Why is an administration that pretends it has a mission from the “Hidden Imam” to liberate the whole world keen to give Russia a licence to land troops in Iran? Obviously, only Ahmadinejad and his associates know the full answer. However, one could speculate that the Khomeinist president has decided that a war with the United States is inevitable. In such a war, the Americans may well seize Iran’s oilfields, an easy target for a surprise attack and a difficult asset for defenders to protect. Once that happens Russia could land troops in northern Iran and then go to the United Nations to ask for a generalised ceasefire and the fixing of a timetable for the withdrawal of “all foreign troops from all Iranian territory.” The US would come under global pressure to cooperate with Russia in ending the conflict and paving the way for the departure of foreign troops and the restoration of Iranian sovereignty. If that is how Ahmadinejad thinks, he has just returned to 1921 and Sayyed Ziauddin Tabatabai in an Iran as weak and as vulnerable. And that, for a man whose ambition is to lead mankind on a new path away from that fixed by “American Arrogance,” is not something to be proud of.
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
AMERICAN ISLAM IN ACTION - OPPRESSIVE FANATICS
Monday, April 28, 2008
Sunday, April 27, 2008
ISLAM & IRAN IN ACTION AGAIN
Wake up America at the deadly asp you are sheltering in your sleeve pretending to be a "religion" of peace!
A teenage Iraqi girl who fell in love with a British soldier when he was in Basra was murdered by her father in an "honour killing", it was revealed today.
Rand Abdel-Qader, 17, was suffocated and then hacked at with a knife after her family discovered she was friends with the 22-year-old soldier who she knew only as Paul.
The pair first met when Rand was working on an aid project for displaced families but it is thought the soldier is unaware of the girl's fate.
She was stamped on, suffocated and stabbed - leaving her with puncture wounds all over her body, including her face.
Her own mother, Leila Hussein, has spoken out about the crime, revealing how her husband called out that he was cleansing "his honour" as he carried out the murder.
She told the Observer he was arrested after the brutal murder but was released without charge two hours later because it was an "honour killing".
"He was released two hours later because it was an 'honour killing'. And unfortunately that is something to be proud of for any Iraqi man," she told the paper.
Rand claimed she was in love from the first moment she met the soldier, who had been working alongside her on an aid project where she was volunteering.
She immediately told her best friend she was dreaming they could have a future together.
Five months on, she was brutally killed and buried without the traditional mourning ceremony in a mark of her "impurity".
Her uncles are also said to have spat on her body because of the shame they felt she had brought on the family.
The fact her relationship with the British soldier she knew as Paul was entirely innocent was not enough to save her.
According to the Observer, she was seen conversing intimately with him and because he was a British "invader" and the enemy, this could not be tolerated.
The pair last saw each other in January but her father, Abdel Qader Ali did not learn of their friendship until two months later on March 16.
He was told by a friend that his daughter had been seen with the soldier and stormed home to confront her.
Ms Hussein described to the paper how he was in a complete rage and trembled as he asked Rand if the story was true, before starting to hit her repeatedly.
She said: "She started to cry, she was nervous. He got hold of her hair and started thumping her again and again.
"I screamed and called out for her two brothers so they could get their father away from her. But when he told them the reason, instead of saving her they helped end her life."
Qader Ali had used his own feet to press down on Rand's throat until she stopped breathing before cutting at her body with a knife, she said.
Sgt Ali Jabbar of Basra police said: "Not much can be done when we have an 'honour killing'. You are in a Muslim society and women should live under religious laws."
Ms Hussein has now divorced her husband and is in hiding under the care of a charity for fear of reprisals from his family for speaking out.
A charity spokeswoman said: "She has been threatened by her husband's family and is very scared."
The Ministry of Defence is thought to be trying to track down the soldier, who is believed to have no idea his friendship with Rand might have put her at risk.
There is no official policy on advising troops how to behave with Iraqi women when they are deployed to the country.
An MoD spokeswoman said: "They are not told: don't go and fall in love."
The murder is believed to be the first "honour killing" in the war-torn country involving a British soldier.
But there were 47 such killing of young women in Basra alone last year and just three convictions, according to the city's Security Committee.
ALSO

Five British hostages who were kidnapped in Iraq almost a year ago are being held inside Iran by Revolutionary Guards, according to two separate sources in the Middle East and London.
The hostages were handed over to the Revolutionary Guards by their Iraqi kidnappers last November, the sources believe. One of the sources said they were being held in the western Iranian city of Hamadan.
If confirmed, the involvement of Revolutionary Guards would be seen as evidence that senior figures in the Iranian government had backed the decision to hold them in the country.
However, British officials said that while there had been rumours that the five were in Iran, they had seen no evidence to support the idea.
The hostages are said to be in good physical shape but spending much of their time in solitary confinement.
According to one of the sources, they are under the control of Mohammad Safaei, 41, a senior Revolutionary Guard colonel who was previously in charge of special operations in the southern Iraqi city of Basra.
The hostages were kidnapped in Baghdad last May in an attempt to force the Americans to release Qais al-Khazaali, an Iraqi militia leader said to be close to the Revolutionary Guards.
Khazaali was apparently being groomed by Iran to take control of a breakaway faction of the Mahdi Army, a Shi’ite militia, that would be compliant with Tehran.
A former chief spokesman for the Mahdi Army, Khazaali was arrested by US troops after masterminding a raid inside a base in which five US soldiers were killed. The Americans have refused to release al-Khazaali in exchange for the British hostages.
One of the sources, who has close links to the Revolutionary Guard, said the captors were looking for a face-saving way of freeing them. They have suggested the hostages write to church leaders in the UK asking for assistance in gaining their release, the source said.
The five were abducted from the Iraqi finance ministry, where one of them, Peter Moore, a computer specialist, was teaching data-processing. The other four were his bodyguards.
The suggestion that the hostages are in Hamadan follows contradictory claims earlier this month that they were in Tehran. This is the first time it has been claimed they are in the hands of Revolutionary Guards. One of the sources has previously proved to be a reliable source of information about them.

LOW LEVEL HOSTAGE TAKER AT U.S. EMBASSY THEN, NOW PRESIDENT, AHMADI-NEJAD THE TURD CONTINUES HIS MODUS OPERANDUM
