سال نو مسیحی برهمه شما عزیزان خجسته باد.
شاد و تندرست باشید
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
USEFUL ITEM, GREAT anytime PRESENT
This find on FreeRepublic.com is the second item I am voluntarily (unpaid, unrewarded) putting up on AntiMullah as something so simple and useful to have at home - unless you have young children. Makes me want to order one myself. Sooner than later.
Kudos to whomever designed this.
http://the-backup.com/
The first and only bedside shotgun rack that enables you to defend your home.
Kudos to whomever designed this.
http://the-backup.com/
The first and only bedside shotgun rack that enables you to defend your home.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
I WANT TO ALWAYS TALK ABUT ME - IT'S ALL ABOUT ME! I AM "THE ONE"
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of (minus) -21 That’s the lowest Approval Index rating yet recorded for this President
Narcissist-in-Chief Gives the Most Narcissistic Speech Ever-Count the "I"s
MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OF OBAMA'S NARCISSISM!
Narcissist-in-Chief Gives the Most Narcissistic Speech Ever-Count the "I"s
INSANE AMERICA! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO US!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VIEW & LISTEN TO THESE VIDEOS
>>> SPECIALLY THE LAST ONE <<<
MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OF OBAMA'S NARCISSISM!
Monday, December 21, 2009
MERRY CHRISTMAS ONE AND ALL
Twas the night of Thanksgiving and out of the house
Tiger Woods came a flyin' .. . . chased by his spouse.
She wielded a nine iron and wasn't too merry,
Cause a bimbo’s phone number was in his Blackberry.
He’d been cheatin' on Elin, and the story progressed.
Woman after woman stepped up and confessed.
He’d been cheatin’ with Holly, and Jaimee, and Cori,
With Joselyn, and Kalika . . . the world had the story.
From the top of the Tour to the basement of blues,
Tiger’s sad sordid tale was all over the news.
With hostesses, waitresses, he had lots of sex,
When not in their pants, he was sendin' them texts.
Despite all his cryin’ and beggin' and pleadin',
Tiger’s wife went investin' . . . a new home in Sweden.
And I heard her exclaim from her white Escalade,
"If you’re gettin' laid then I’m gettin' paid."
She’s not pouting, in fact, she is of jolly good cheer,
Her prenup made Christmas come early this year.
AVOID CENSUS FRAUD & GIVE ONLY ONE PIECE OF INFORMATION
2010 Census to Begin
THIS IS PRETTY BASIC ADVICE; BUT, IN TODAY'S TIMES, I CAN SEE IT COULD LEAVE AN OPEN DOOR FOR PASSING OUT YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION. WARNING:
2010 Census Cautions from the Better Business Bureau
Be Cautious About Giving Info to Census Workers by Susan Johnson
With the U.S. Census process beginning, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) advises people to be cooperative, but cautious, so as not to become a victim of fraud or identity theft.
The first phase of the 2010 U.S. Census is underway as workers have begun verifying the addresses of households across the country. Eventually, more than 140,000 U.S. Census workers will count every person in the United States and will gather information about every person living at each address including name, age, gender, race, and other relevant data.
The big question is - how do you tell the difference between a U.S. Census worker and a con artist? BBB offers the following advice:
If a U.S. Census worker knocks on your door, they will have a badge, a handheld device, a Census Bureau canvas bag, and a confidentiality notice. Ask to see their identification and their badge before answering their questions. However, you should never invite anyone you don't know into your home.
Census workers are currently only knocking on doors to verify address information. Do not give your Social Security number, credit card or banking information to anyone, even if they claim they need it for the U.S. Census.
REMEMBER, NO MATTER WHAT THEY ASK, YOU REALLY ONLY NEED TO TELL THEM ONE PIECE OF INFORMATION "HOW MANY PEOPLE LIVE AT YOUR ADDRESS" AND THAT IS IT.
While the Census Bureau might ask for basic financial information, such as a salary range, YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER ANYTHING AT ALL ABOU T YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION. The Census Bureau will not ask for Social Security, bank account, or credit card numbers, nor will employees solicit donations. Anyone asking for that information is NOT with the Census Bureau.
AND REMEMBER, THE CENSUS BUREAU HAS DECIDED NOT TO WORK WITH ACORN ON GATHERING THIS INFORMATION. No Acorn worker should approach you saying he/she is with the Census Bureau.
Eventually, Census workers may contact you by telephone, mail, or in person at home. However, the Census Bureau will not contact you by Email, so be on the lookout for Email scams impersonating the Census.
Never click on a link or open any attachments in an Email that are supposedly from the U.S. Census Bureau.
For more advice on avoiding identity theft and fraud, visit http://www.bbb.org/
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFO WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
THIS IS PRETTY BASIC ADVICE; BUT, IN TODAY'S TIMES, I CAN SEE IT COULD LEAVE AN OPEN DOOR FOR PASSING OUT YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION. WARNING:
2010 Census Cautions from the Better Business Bureau
Be Cautious About Giving Info to Census Workers by Susan Johnson
With the U.S. Census process beginning, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) advises people to be cooperative, but cautious, so as not to become a victim of fraud or identity theft.
The first phase of the 2010 U.S. Census is underway as workers have begun verifying the addresses of households across the country. Eventually, more than 140,000 U.S. Census workers will count every person in the United States and will gather information about every person living at each address including name, age, gender, race, and other relevant data.
The big question is - how do you tell the difference between a U.S. Census worker and a con artist? BBB offers the following advice:
If a U.S. Census worker knocks on your door, they will have a badge, a handheld device, a Census Bureau canvas bag, and a confidentiality notice. Ask to see their identification and their badge before answering their questions. However, you should never invite anyone you don't know into your home.
Census workers are currently only knocking on doors to verify address information. Do not give your Social Security number, credit card or banking information to anyone, even if they claim they need it for the U.S. Census.
REMEMBER, NO MATTER WHAT THEY ASK, YOU REALLY ONLY NEED TO TELL THEM ONE PIECE OF INFORMATION "HOW MANY PEOPLE LIVE AT YOUR ADDRESS" AND THAT IS IT.
While the Census Bureau might ask for basic financial information, such as a salary range, YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER ANYTHING AT ALL ABOU T YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION. The Census Bureau will not ask for Social Security, bank account, or credit card numbers, nor will employees solicit donations. Anyone asking for that information is NOT with the Census Bureau.
AND REMEMBER, THE CENSUS BUREAU HAS DECIDED NOT TO WORK WITH ACORN ON GATHERING THIS INFORMATION. No Acorn worker should approach you saying he/she is with the Census Bureau.
Eventually, Census workers may contact you by telephone, mail, or in person at home. However, the Census Bureau will not contact you by Email, so be on the lookout for Email scams impersonating the Census.
Never click on a link or open any attachments in an Email that are supposedly from the U.S. Census Bureau.
For more advice on avoiding identity theft and fraud, visit http://www.bbb.org/
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFO WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
Sunday, December 20, 2009
GRAND AYATOLLAH DIES AND PERHAPS ALSO KILLS CURRENT REGIME
Top dissident Iranian cleric dies
=========================================================
One of Iran's most prominent dissident clerics, Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, has died aged 87.
Hossein Ali Montazeri was a moving spirit in the 1979 revolution which created Iran's Islamic state, and was at one stage set to become its leader. His fierce criticism of the slaughter by Khomeini in his prisons - ended in his being "banned" and theoretically "demoted".
Announcing his death, the Mullah regime refused to even give him an Ayatollah title let alone his true Grand Ayatollah one, mentioning him only by his name.
One of Shia Islam's most respected figures, he was also a leading critic of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and consequently the lunatic, Hojatieh sect 12th Imam leader, Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi (nicknamed "crocodile").
A huge outpouring of sympathy by the opposition, many of whom may well believe he was murdered (despite his age and many illnesses) despite his son announcing his father died of natural causes in his sleep - with various illnesses as the root cause. Diabetes, lung problems and asthma.
Iran's rulers will now fear the opposition may attempt a big turnout for his funeral on Monday and other ceremonies marking his death, especially in the run-up to the Shia Muslim festival of Tassua & Ashura on 27/28 December.
Large crowds have gathered outside Montazeri's home in the "holy" city of Qom, following his death on Saturday evening. And opposition leaders and street rebels/dissenters have planned huge demonstrations during the 40 days mourning period in Shia Islam after which the soul departs earthly confines and finally passes to the other side and gives families and friends closure.
He will be laid to rest at the shrine of Hazrate Masoumeh, one of the most revered female saints in Shia Islam.
Thousands of people from Isfahan, Najafabad (his birth place) , Shiraz and other cities are on their way to Qom to attend Monday's ceremony, according to one report.
The Supreme Ruler, low level cleric, false ayatollah Ali Khamenei, usurper of this position from Montazeri has government media emphasize Montazeri's falling our with regime founder Ayatollah Khomeini but this trump card no longer works.
After a dual photo poster of Khamenei and Khomeini was publicly burned in the street by protesters, Khamenei tried to fan the flames of this disrespect of the founder Rouhallah Khomeini into an anti-protester uprising by the populace.
The trigger here was for regime agents, pretending to be dissenters, to publicly tear up posters of Khomeini while one of them used a high-tech video camera t record this.
Unfortunately the young population of Iran, most of whom aged under 30-years, barely remember Khomeini and consider him a historic fuddy-duddy who caused their current challenges and social pain and discomforts, want no part of this inflammation and show interest only in the present and future, not the past.
A demonstration organized to protest the flaunted disrespect of Khomeini barely gathered at MOST 50,000 as opposed to hundreds of thousands in the past.
Exhortations to the bazaar to close for this reason met with a total disregard and it stayed open. Similar exhortations for the bazaar to stay open and not mourn for Montazeri was equally ignored.
Calls for Friday prayers to show huge numbers in support of Khomeini in opposition to the Green movement dissidents barely met normal attendance in Tehran and numbers were far below normal in cities like Isfahan, Tabriz and many other major centers.
AntiMullah has been asked to promote a reaction by the followers of dissenting youth protests by having them obtain photos of Khomeini, cut them up and scatter them surreptitiously in Tehran and other city streets of Iran from under the "chadors" (tent-like Islamic female robes) or down trouser legs to evidence their protest against the Mullah regime. Walking over his face, even in pieces, being an ultimate disrespect.
Similarly for ex-patriates to obtain photos of Khomeini in other countries, cut them up and send them to Islamic diplomatic missions or Special Interest Representatives to designate their anti-regime sentiments. And/or news outlets.
Born into a provincial family in 1922 he was arrested for leading protests against Iran's monarchy but though designated Khomeini's successor, he fell out with him in 1980's over the mass murders (including 30,000 of the Mojaheddin - MEK) in Khomeini's prisons ON KHOMEINI'S DIRECT mass murder ORDERS) and culminating in 1989 just before Khomeini's death.
He was placed under house arrest in 1997 for six years for correctly and validly criticising current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for lack of clerical qualifications and misuse of power. Khamenei was a lowly Hojat-ol-Eslam when Khomeini died and SUPPOSEDLY decreed him to be the new successor in a fatwa which was issued by a comatose or already dead Khomeini, with only his co-conspirator son Ahmad and Khomeini's seal as witness.
A witness the usurper Ali Khamenei immediately had strangled to death in the same hospital to hide the falsification of the decree.
A constant, increasingly outspoken critic, in 2009 Montazeri issued a fatwa condemning President Ahmadinejad's government after June's disputed election.
After his detention, state-run media began referring to him as a "simple-minded" cleric, references to him in schoolbooks were erased and streets named after him were renamed, but he remained defiant.
Prior to the overthrow of the Iranian monarchy, he organised public protests in support of Khomeini, following the latter's arrest back in 1964, when Khomeini sided with rich landowners and tried to oppose the Shah's White Revolution through which he bought the land from them and deeded it to the peasiants who worked on it.
Landowners turned to weird cleric Khomeini to issue a fatwa that the Shah had no right to disposses the fat cat landowners, some of whom held properties the size of Switzerland and never visited parts of their lands, sending their supervisors to collect their share of the crops - like in fedual England - except this was in the 1960's not 1160's.
The landowners claimed they had been cheated and the price paid for their lands was too low. In fact the Shah had let THEM set the price of their land by paying them the value they had repeatedly declared as its value in their tax returns for many years!
Montazeri often said his opinions were guided by his "sense of religious duty" and his support of Moussavi and Karoubi an effort to restore the faith of the people in Islam and he accused the regime of encouraging people to hate religion by "misusing Islam".
"From the beginning of the revolution, we have been chanting slogans of independence, liberty, Islamic republic, (esteghlaal. aazaadi, jomhouri eslami* )" he said. "The complaint I have is why the slogans we have been chanting since then and are still chanting haven't been fulfilled."
* the 1978/79 anti-Shah slogan
Meanwhile people from all over the country are heading for Qom to participate in the Monday funeral and the seventh and fortieth day ceremonies.
The 7th day coincides with Shia Tassua/Ashura day where a brave fight for freedom took place by a highly outnumbered Islamic force under Ali's sons Hassan and Hossein, who died with all their men.
These days were also the high water of Khomeini's anti-Shah protests.
With the regime sending up helicopters over major cities to perhaps machine gun down protesters, the rising chant has become "The Green Ayatollah continues on" (meaning the movement does not die with him).
On the contrary his death seems to have enflamed the anti-regime movement he also began to shoulder on their behalf but will almost certainly result in the arrest of secular Moussavi, ayatollah Karoubi and ayatollah Rafsanjani (lower case titles).
The regime has already declared Rafsanjani (fairly accurately) to no longer merits the title of Ayatollah, meaning they can arrests and EXECUTE him. Ayatollahs cannot be executed.
Ayatollah Boroujerdi, son of a Grand Ayatollah of the same name, who has been imprisoned in an Iranian Kordestan prison for a recent sedition similar to what Montazeri has been preaching and not executed as anyone else would have been, is also another dissident senior cleric.
Senior (real) Ayatollahs in Shiraz, Isfahan and Mashhad (Khamenei's home town) and Tabriz have also openly questioned Ali Khanenei's clerical legitimacy to be Supreme Ruler and criticized his mass killing of protesters in the streets.
The eventual arrests, likely in the next few days, of Moussavi, Karoubi, Rafsanjani and possibly Khatami - as dissidents and leaders of the Green movement will set the country on fire - as promised by the student movements.
Meanwhile a group of clerics calling themselves "the fighting clerics" has also geared up to oppose the regime.
With several regular army units declaring themselves for the students and the suppresssion forces of the Revolutionary Guards and even non-Arab mercenary members of the Bassiji Suppression Forces weakening in their resolve in the streets, this cold be the beginning of the end of Ali Khamenei and Ahmadi-Nejad.
Who or what will replace them is still unclear. Probably Moussavi (unless he is immediately murdered in prison after his arrest as expected) as a caretaker "head of country" without any formal title, probably with a ruling junta of clerics and non-clerical persons, till a new election and new Constitution can be formulated.
Pollitical groups like the Tudeh Communist Party and the Mojaheddin MEK) will make any transition difficult and fraught with conflict and bloodshed.
Ahmadi-Nejad has already granted Russian permission to use Southern Iran ports for their war ships and by removing the requirement of Azarbaijanis to obtain visas to visit Iran has opened the northern end of Iran to Russian infiltration or even invisible invasion.
And the final piece of the detestable pie is China, which will certainly try to send in troops to protect the stability of the region. And their $300 Billion oil and gas contrcts with Islamic Iran. Their problem is the long distances involved - specially as a long planned railroad to the Far East/China has long been delayed for this very reason.
Iran is far more dangerous than Nukes - world war is in the offing with these conflucting currents. The USA under Oba-Hussein-Khomeini prefers to turn a blind eye to any of it. Hoping that supporting the current regime will work for his global, Communistic world order. Marxist-Islamic would suit him fine, too.
Hossein Ali Montazeri was a moving spirit in the 1979 revolution which created Iran's Islamic state, and was at one stage set to become its leader. His fierce criticism of the slaughter by Khomeini in his prisons - ended in his being "banned" and theoretically "demoted".
Announcing his death, the Mullah regime refused to even give him an Ayatollah title let alone his true Grand Ayatollah one, mentioning him only by his name.
One of Shia Islam's most respected figures, he was also a leading critic of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and consequently the lunatic, Hojatieh sect 12th Imam leader, Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi (nicknamed "crocodile").
A huge outpouring of sympathy by the opposition, many of whom may well believe he was murdered (despite his age and many illnesses) despite his son announcing his father died of natural causes in his sleep - with various illnesses as the root cause. Diabetes, lung problems and asthma.
Iran's rulers will now fear the opposition may attempt a big turnout for his funeral on Monday and other ceremonies marking his death, especially in the run-up to the Shia Muslim festival of Tassua & Ashura on 27/28 December.
Large crowds have gathered outside Montazeri's home in the "holy" city of Qom, following his death on Saturday evening. And opposition leaders and street rebels/dissenters have planned huge demonstrations during the 40 days mourning period in Shia Islam after which the soul departs earthly confines and finally passes to the other side and gives families and friends closure.
He will be laid to rest at the shrine of Hazrate Masoumeh, one of the most revered female saints in Shia Islam.
Thousands of people from Isfahan, Najafabad (his birth place) , Shiraz and other cities are on their way to Qom to attend Monday's ceremony, according to one report.
The Supreme Ruler, low level cleric, false ayatollah Ali Khamenei, usurper of this position from Montazeri has government media emphasize Montazeri's falling our with regime founder Ayatollah Khomeini but this trump card no longer works.
After a dual photo poster of Khamenei and Khomeini was publicly burned in the street by protesters, Khamenei tried to fan the flames of this disrespect of the founder Rouhallah Khomeini into an anti-protester uprising by the populace.
The trigger here was for regime agents, pretending to be dissenters, to publicly tear up posters of Khomeini while one of them used a high-tech video camera t record this.
Unfortunately the young population of Iran, most of whom aged under 30-years, barely remember Khomeini and consider him a historic fuddy-duddy who caused their current challenges and social pain and discomforts, want no part of this inflammation and show interest only in the present and future, not the past.
A demonstration organized to protest the flaunted disrespect of Khomeini barely gathered at MOST 50,000 as opposed to hundreds of thousands in the past.
Exhortations to the bazaar to close for this reason met with a total disregard and it stayed open. Similar exhortations for the bazaar to stay open and not mourn for Montazeri was equally ignored.
Calls for Friday prayers to show huge numbers in support of Khomeini in opposition to the Green movement dissidents barely met normal attendance in Tehran and numbers were far below normal in cities like Isfahan, Tabriz and many other major centers.
AntiMullah has been asked to promote a reaction by the followers of dissenting youth protests by having them obtain photos of Khomeini, cut them up and scatter them surreptitiously in Tehran and other city streets of Iran from under the "chadors" (tent-like Islamic female robes) or down trouser legs to evidence their protest against the Mullah regime. Walking over his face, even in pieces, being an ultimate disrespect.
Similarly for ex-patriates to obtain photos of Khomeini in other countries, cut them up and send them to Islamic diplomatic missions or Special Interest Representatives to designate their anti-regime sentiments. And/or news outlets.
Born into a provincial family in 1922 he was arrested for leading protests against Iran's monarchy but though designated Khomeini's successor, he fell out with him in 1980's over the mass murders (including 30,000 of the Mojaheddin - MEK) in Khomeini's prisons ON KHOMEINI'S DIRECT mass murder ORDERS) and culminating in 1989 just before Khomeini's death.
He was placed under house arrest in 1997 for six years for correctly and validly criticising current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for lack of clerical qualifications and misuse of power. Khamenei was a lowly Hojat-ol-Eslam when Khomeini died and SUPPOSEDLY decreed him to be the new successor in a fatwa which was issued by a comatose or already dead Khomeini, with only his co-conspirator son Ahmad and Khomeini's seal as witness.
A witness the usurper Ali Khamenei immediately had strangled to death in the same hospital to hide the falsification of the decree.
A constant, increasingly outspoken critic, in 2009 Montazeri issued a fatwa condemning President Ahmadinejad's government after June's disputed election.
After his detention, state-run media began referring to him as a "simple-minded" cleric, references to him in schoolbooks were erased and streets named after him were renamed, but he remained defiant.
Prior to the overthrow of the Iranian monarchy, he organised public protests in support of Khomeini, following the latter's arrest back in 1964, when Khomeini sided with rich landowners and tried to oppose the Shah's White Revolution through which he bought the land from them and deeded it to the peasiants who worked on it.
Landowners turned to weird cleric Khomeini to issue a fatwa that the Shah had no right to disposses the fat cat landowners, some of whom held properties the size of Switzerland and never visited parts of their lands, sending their supervisors to collect their share of the crops - like in fedual England - except this was in the 1960's not 1160's.
The landowners claimed they had been cheated and the price paid for their lands was too low. In fact the Shah had let THEM set the price of their land by paying them the value they had repeatedly declared as its value in their tax returns for many years!
Montazeri often said his opinions were guided by his "sense of religious duty" and his support of Moussavi and Karoubi an effort to restore the faith of the people in Islam and he accused the regime of encouraging people to hate religion by "misusing Islam".
"From the beginning of the revolution, we have been chanting slogans of independence, liberty, Islamic republic, (esteghlaal. aazaadi, jomhouri eslami* )" he said. "The complaint I have is why the slogans we have been chanting since then and are still chanting haven't been fulfilled."
* the 1978/79 anti-Shah slogan
Meanwhile people from all over the country are heading for Qom to participate in the Monday funeral and the seventh and fortieth day ceremonies.
The 7th day coincides with Shia Tassua/Ashura day where a brave fight for freedom took place by a highly outnumbered Islamic force under Ali's sons Hassan and Hossein, who died with all their men.
These days were also the high water of Khomeini's anti-Shah protests.
With the regime sending up helicopters over major cities to perhaps machine gun down protesters, the rising chant has become "The Green Ayatollah continues on" (meaning the movement does not die with him).
On the contrary his death seems to have enflamed the anti-regime movement he also began to shoulder on their behalf but will almost certainly result in the arrest of secular Moussavi, ayatollah Karoubi and ayatollah Rafsanjani (lower case titles).
The regime has already declared Rafsanjani (fairly accurately) to no longer merits the title of Ayatollah, meaning they can arrests and EXECUTE him. Ayatollahs cannot be executed.
Ayatollah Boroujerdi, son of a Grand Ayatollah of the same name, who has been imprisoned in an Iranian Kordestan prison for a recent sedition similar to what Montazeri has been preaching and not executed as anyone else would have been, is also another dissident senior cleric.
Senior (real) Ayatollahs in Shiraz, Isfahan and Mashhad (Khamenei's home town) and Tabriz have also openly questioned Ali Khanenei's clerical legitimacy to be Supreme Ruler and criticized his mass killing of protesters in the streets.
The eventual arrests, likely in the next few days, of Moussavi, Karoubi, Rafsanjani and possibly Khatami - as dissidents and leaders of the Green movement will set the country on fire - as promised by the student movements.
Meanwhile a group of clerics calling themselves "the fighting clerics" has also geared up to oppose the regime.
With several regular army units declaring themselves for the students and the suppresssion forces of the Revolutionary Guards and even non-Arab mercenary members of the Bassiji Suppression Forces weakening in their resolve in the streets, this cold be the beginning of the end of Ali Khamenei and Ahmadi-Nejad.
Who or what will replace them is still unclear. Probably Moussavi (unless he is immediately murdered in prison after his arrest as expected) as a caretaker "head of country" without any formal title, probably with a ruling junta of clerics and non-clerical persons, till a new election and new Constitution can be formulated.
Pollitical groups like the Tudeh Communist Party and the Mojaheddin MEK) will make any transition difficult and fraught with conflict and bloodshed.
Ahmadi-Nejad has already granted Russian permission to use Southern Iran ports for their war ships and by removing the requirement of Azarbaijanis to obtain visas to visit Iran has opened the northern end of Iran to Russian infiltration or even invisible invasion.
And the final piece of the detestable pie is China, which will certainly try to send in troops to protect the stability of the region. And their $300 Billion oil and gas contrcts with Islamic Iran. Their problem is the long distances involved - specially as a long planned railroad to the Far East/China has long been delayed for this very reason.
Iran is far more dangerous than Nukes - world war is in the offing with these conflucting currents. The USA under Oba-Hussein-Khomeini prefers to turn a blind eye to any of it. Hoping that supporting the current regime will work for his global, Communistic world order. Marxist-Islamic would suit him fine, too.
OPEN LETTER TO RECENTLY EXECUTED IRANIAN YOUTH
SEX WITH GIRLFRIEND? THEN HANG TILL DEAD! CLICK HERE
Teenager Mosleh Zamani - dead
Another youth previously faces execution with a smile
Teenager Mosleh Zamani - dead
Another youth previously faces execution with a smileBe of good cheer, I die without fear of the Mullahs!
Saturday, December 19, 2009
GOOD EXPANSION ON MY ARTICLE ABOUT KHOMEINI'S ORIGIN
I came across this last night by chance and want to say "kudos" (well done) to the writer for adding information to my tightly focused original article from years back.
Diplomatically and politely stopping short of calling me a nutcase, he provides a balanced look into this. No harm, no foul.
To add focus to the story, something I left out as superfluous and private, my original source for the information I provided came from an old man, an Iranian, who worked with Khomeini's father Haj Abdollah Williamson. At the time he was a young man starting his career within the oil industry.
I have left out his name for his own peace, though we have long lost touch with each other and sadly, based on age, he may no longer be with us.
Chisholm, who was Haji Wiliamson;s boss, did go on record and the hard copy of the news article exists where he said "Haji went native but if he is Khomeini's father I couldn't say". That is a pure "no comment" response since if there not truth in it, the response would have been a scoffing one of something like "what nonsense! Not the Haji I knew. He worked for me so I would know."
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/who-is-ayatollah-khomeini.html
Just as in the Carter illegally pressuring the Shah article, I left out that the man walking beside the Volkswagen van with the cleric on top regulating the speed of the demonstrators marching on the U.S. Embassy, was an employee (former by that time) of mine, so the conversation reported to me was accurate and well sourced.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/jimmy-carters-illegal-demands-on-shah.html
Anyway, the article by Melik deserves a read and attention.
Incidentally, converted Jew, Elias Eliasi, built an extension of the notorious Evin prison shortly after the revolution and nearly ended inside it as an inmate when his work was disapproved by the head of the prison who had handed him the sweetheart project. Or perhaps Elias failed to pay the bribe money to him in full.
As you can see AntiMullah has considerable insider information but does not post all we know unless it comes up for good reason.
Was Khomeini's Father A Brit?
Melik Kaylan, 10.09.09
The claim that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was born into a Jewish family appeared in the Daily Telegraph last week. His identity card, which he had proudly displayed to press cameras during the last election, when closely examined revealed his original family name as "Sabourjian"-- meaning someone in the schmatte trade and usually denoting Jewish roots, because it refers specifically to the weaving of Jewish religious garments.
A number of commentators felt that Ahmadinejad's fierce anti-Israeli sentiments now made sense. His father had converted to Islam in order to marry his Muslim mother and the son grew up with the zeal of a convert.
Will anyone in Iran believe the allegations, and will they care? And even then, can they do anything anyway? Ahmadinejad's unpopularity matters little at his point in a system founded on interlocking power blocs rather than popular consent. If the regime has any pretence to legitimacy left, it derives from the residual authority inherited from the cult of Ayatollah Khomeini.
What of Khomeini's legitimacy? Three years ago some astonishing documents came into my possession regarding that point. I have not been able to verify the allegations contained in them. The Internet bubbles and boils on the subject and fades into conspiracy with no concrete verdict. Quite simply, it needs further hard investigation in Iranian or Middle Eastern archives by qualified impartial researchers. No doubt they wouldn't survive long if they tried. So I offer the information raw, in the hope that others more qualified than myself will look further.
The material reached me in the oddest way. I was attending an old boys reunion weekend at Clifton College, my old boarding school in England. The head of the alumni society handed me an envelope -- he'd been asked by unnamed former pupils to make sure I got them. I didn't get a chance to peer inside until I'd returned to the U.S. The envelope contained two documents: a Xeroxed book review from the long-defunct Illustrated London News dated Nov. 10, 1951, and titled "Arabian Adventurer. The Story of Haji Williamson;" and a May 3, 2006 Xerox of an article entitled "Who Was The Ayatollah Khomeini?" from a publication called Persian Journal.
The book review related the adventure-strewn life of a Victorian Englishman born in 1872, William Richard Williamson, who attended Clifton's preparatory school and found the discipline so distasteful that he ran off to sea as a young teenager.
He sailed around on British merchant ships, hated that too, and roamed around the U.S. as a cowboy, miner, actor and the like, then roamed the world finding odd jobs from the Philippines to the Persian Gulf. In the 1890s, Williamson fetched up in Arabia and settled there.
He went thoroughly native, wore local garb, converted to Islam, (Alan note: as a Arab Sunni not a Shia which Iranians follow) married two wives in the Islamic way and produced 13 offspring. The review quotes the book: "His exploits make him a legendary figure among the Arabs. His career as a desert fighter and camel dealer in Arabia, leader of expeditions in the wilds of Oman, pearler in the Persian Gulf, secret agent of Iraq, and representative of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, is remarkable, judged by any standard."
Williamson undertook the haj to Mecca several times, and Arabs knew him as Haji Abdullah al-Zobair.
Let us leave the Haji there for now and turn to the Persian Journal article entitled "Who Was Ayatollah Khomeini?" by one Alan Peters. I have found a shorter version of it on the Web, and in both versions the material seems highly detailed, deeply probed, well ordered and not at all loony in tone. The gist? That Khomeini was one of Haji Williamson's offspring. But first, who is Peters and what of Persian Journal? The publication still exists, it seems, and appears to be one of those California-based expatriate-Iranian effusions.
The author of the article, Peters, pops up repeatedly on the Web as a stridently anti-Muslim voice "dedicated to the removal of the Islamic regime in Iran." So say his various posts, which gradually turn increasingly odd and even a little unhinged until, alarmingly, one finds the assertion that "Oba-Hussein is doing to America what Khomeini did to Iran"-- at which point one is tempted to cast the entire nest of hornets aside in disgust.
Yet one shouldn't. Peters, my Iranian friends tell me, is a U.K.-based, elderly, possibly half-Iranian British gent who lived in Iran for many years and is married to an Iranian. They say he has turned into a sensationalist and even fantasist in his later years -- but that he has done good work in the past. One gets the impression of a contradictory gentleman with increasingly showy and exaggerated opinions but with a past talent for dogged research.
Let us leave "Alan Peters" out of it for now. The hypothesis must stand or fall on its own merits. The story begins with Haji Williamson's Kashmiri wife. The official story goes that Khomeini's mother was said to be a Muslim of Indian descent. Of his father the official details are foggy but indicate a Persian Muslim living in Kashmir -- where Williamson often stayed. (Alan note: regularly vacationed to get away from the Persian Gulf heat).
Williamson was a devout Muslim and educated his kids in religious Shiite schools under top ayatollahs. (Alan note: Iraq's religious schools were the best and closest to him and happened to be Shia. Haji, himself, was a pure Sunni convert. Unlike his brothers, Khomeini failed the high level teaching standards in Iraq and was then sent to the Iranian city of Qom which had lower standards).
"Two of them," says the article, "Hindizadeh (meaning Indian born) and Passandieh (meaning pleasing or approved) studied well and eventually became ayatollahs in their own right. The third boy, a troublesome young man, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the holy city of Qom and studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under the rule of Reza Shah (the Shah's father) the young man chose the city of his residence (Qom or Khom) and took on the name of Khomeini." (Alan note: there is the tthe more widespread opinion that he lived in the Iranian town of Khomein and this became the origin of his name)
Williamson lived in Iran on and off between the World Wars and eventually got ejected by Reza Shah for working too closely with British oil interests. The article is so well-written and well-informed on the intricate regional history of the decades when the British ruled the Middle East and parts of Iran that--well, that it's hard to square such erudition with some of the views that the author, Alan Peters, seems to hold now. A detailed chronicle of Khomeini's early years follows, ending with his return to Iran after the Shah is unseated. Under the Shah, Khomeini was sentenced to death for his anti-monarchical views and given the title of ayatollah by clerics who wished to protect him from execution -- ayatollahs were exempt from the death sentence--who also abetted his escape from Iran.
(Alan note: as someone who knew General Pakravan , head of SAVAK - internal security - cross between the FBI AND CIA and his children on a personal level, the real story is that Ayatollah Shariatmadari, a strong supporter of the Shah, was worried that executing Khomeini would create a martyr and become a problem for the monarchy. General Pakravan came up with the idea to elevate the low level cleric to an ayatollah status and Shariatmadari helped with making this happen on the clerical level, He did not escape the country, he was formally exiled by Iranian courts).
Upon his return, Khomeini pointedly moved to kill off leading figures with knowledge of his past, indeed who helped him escape execution, including an Iranian senator (Alan note: who used his influence to obtain Iranian citizenship documents since Khomeini had no Iranian origin, nor Iranian blood in his veins - neither paternal nor maternal) and the Grand Ayatollah Shariatmadari. The senator had closely befriended Haji Williamson during his years in Iran. The Grand Ayatollah survived the hit but was placed under house arrest for many years. Documents pertaining to Khomeini's antecedents, according to the article, quickly disappeared or got changed during this time -- something I had heard mentioned over the years by other sources.
(Alan note: as did his lunatic religious writings - such as sexual instructions on bestial and pedophilian sex - scrubbed inside Iran where possessing Khomeini's early, written sayings now receives a death sentence!)
The article brings up other flimsier -- but cumulatively suggestive - - details such as Khomeini's dodgy Farsi accent and the testimony of a veteran British Petroleum operative (many such officials were also British intelligence agents) who had known Williamson well and refused to comment on Khomeini's parentage.
Documentation of births and deaths, generally, remained very iffy in many parts of the Islamic world well into the 1950s as empires crumbled into nation states, borders hardened, tribes were forcibly sedentarized, and new family names got adopted, so a theory like this is very easy to cook up -- but it is also just as likely to be true. My Iranian sources tell me that Khomeini's own grandson, Hossein Khomeini, who visited the U.S. once in 2003, feels that his grandfather's antecedents are distinctly foggy.*
What to make of it all? Why does it matter, if true? Here's why: Iranians struggle with a number of contradictory claims on their sense of identity: nationalism, Shiism, ethnic and tribal affiliations, wider Persian and farsophone continuums reaching into, say, Tajikistan and Afghanistan.
The mullahs (taazis) have tried to emphasize the Shiite and nationalist senses of identity but the two are not always in synch: many (Alan note: liberal, secularly inclined) Iranians, for example, have continued to revere (Alan: but not worship) various irreligious Persian poets of past millennia and picnic at their tombs. From the earliest Muslim-Persian era in the first millennium onwards, Persians have harbored a resentment of the Arabization of their ancient culture.
Iranians remember that soon after the 1979 Khomeini revolution, many of the security personnel at prisons and police stations were Arabs and other foreigners who'd been mysteriously imported to do the dirty work--from Lebanon and elsewhere. (Alan: currently Supreme Ruler Khamenei has imported over 5,000 felons from Palestinian prisons to kill and maim demonstrators). Similarly, we all know what Iranians think of British meddling in their history. So Khomeini's international antecedents touch on highly sensitive fault lines in the Iranian psyche.
The same goes for Ahmadinejad. Iranian Jews belong to one of the world's oldest Jewish communities. Most educated Iranians consider them so indigenous as to be native. But many ethnic nationalists or anti-Zionists don't.
Ironically, they are just the types who would make up the bulk of Ahmadinejad's followers. (I'm told that an aunt of Ahmadinejad lives in Haifa and has recently popped up in an Israeli newspaper outlining her family lineage.) According to my Iranian sources, two of the regime's scariest characters -- Elias Asgaroladi-Islami and Elias Eliasi -- are converted Jews who run the Motalefeh, a political party/goon squad with very bloody hands as shadowy paramilitary enforcers.
Diplomatically and politely stopping short of calling me a nutcase, he provides a balanced look into this. No harm, no foul.
To add focus to the story, something I left out as superfluous and private, my original source for the information I provided came from an old man, an Iranian, who worked with Khomeini's father Haj Abdollah Williamson. At the time he was a young man starting his career within the oil industry.
I have left out his name for his own peace, though we have long lost touch with each other and sadly, based on age, he may no longer be with us.
Chisholm, who was Haji Wiliamson;s boss, did go on record and the hard copy of the news article exists where he said "Haji went native but if he is Khomeini's father I couldn't say". That is a pure "no comment" response since if there not truth in it, the response would have been a scoffing one of something like "what nonsense! Not the Haji I knew. He worked for me so I would know."
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/who-is-ayatollah-khomeini.html
Just as in the Carter illegally pressuring the Shah article, I left out that the man walking beside the Volkswagen van with the cleric on top regulating the speed of the demonstrators marching on the U.S. Embassy, was an employee (former by that time) of mine, so the conversation reported to me was accurate and well sourced.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2004/03/jimmy-carters-illegal-demands-on-shah.html
Anyway, the article by Melik deserves a read and attention.
Incidentally, converted Jew, Elias Eliasi, built an extension of the notorious Evin prison shortly after the revolution and nearly ended inside it as an inmate when his work was disapproved by the head of the prison who had handed him the sweetheart project. Or perhaps Elias failed to pay the bribe money to him in full.
As you can see AntiMullah has considerable insider information but does not post all we know unless it comes up for good reason.
KHOMEINI (CENTER)
Was Khomeini's Father A Brit?
Melik Kaylan, 10.09.09
The claim that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was born into a Jewish family appeared in the Daily Telegraph last week. His identity card, which he had proudly displayed to press cameras during the last election, when closely examined revealed his original family name as "Sabourjian"-- meaning someone in the schmatte trade and usually denoting Jewish roots, because it refers specifically to the weaving of Jewish religious garments.
A number of commentators felt that Ahmadinejad's fierce anti-Israeli sentiments now made sense. His father had converted to Islam in order to marry his Muslim mother and the son grew up with the zeal of a convert.
Will anyone in Iran believe the allegations, and will they care? And even then, can they do anything anyway? Ahmadinejad's unpopularity matters little at his point in a system founded on interlocking power blocs rather than popular consent. If the regime has any pretence to legitimacy left, it derives from the residual authority inherited from the cult of Ayatollah Khomeini.
What of Khomeini's legitimacy? Three years ago some astonishing documents came into my possession regarding that point. I have not been able to verify the allegations contained in them. The Internet bubbles and boils on the subject and fades into conspiracy with no concrete verdict. Quite simply, it needs further hard investigation in Iranian or Middle Eastern archives by qualified impartial researchers. No doubt they wouldn't survive long if they tried. So I offer the information raw, in the hope that others more qualified than myself will look further.
The material reached me in the oddest way. I was attending an old boys reunion weekend at Clifton College, my old boarding school in England. The head of the alumni society handed me an envelope -- he'd been asked by unnamed former pupils to make sure I got them. I didn't get a chance to peer inside until I'd returned to the U.S. The envelope contained two documents: a Xeroxed book review from the long-defunct Illustrated London News dated Nov. 10, 1951, and titled "Arabian Adventurer. The Story of Haji Williamson;" and a May 3, 2006 Xerox of an article entitled "Who Was The Ayatollah Khomeini?" from a publication called Persian Journal.
The book review related the adventure-strewn life of a Victorian Englishman born in 1872, William Richard Williamson, who attended Clifton's preparatory school and found the discipline so distasteful that he ran off to sea as a young teenager.
He sailed around on British merchant ships, hated that too, and roamed around the U.S. as a cowboy, miner, actor and the like, then roamed the world finding odd jobs from the Philippines to the Persian Gulf. In the 1890s, Williamson fetched up in Arabia and settled there.
He went thoroughly native, wore local garb, converted to Islam, (Alan note: as a Arab Sunni not a Shia which Iranians follow) married two wives in the Islamic way and produced 13 offspring. The review quotes the book: "His exploits make him a legendary figure among the Arabs. His career as a desert fighter and camel dealer in Arabia, leader of expeditions in the wilds of Oman, pearler in the Persian Gulf, secret agent of Iraq, and representative of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, is remarkable, judged by any standard."
Williamson undertook the haj to Mecca several times, and Arabs knew him as Haji Abdullah al-Zobair.
Let us leave the Haji there for now and turn to the Persian Journal article entitled "Who Was Ayatollah Khomeini?" by one Alan Peters. I have found a shorter version of it on the Web, and in both versions the material seems highly detailed, deeply probed, well ordered and not at all loony in tone. The gist? That Khomeini was one of Haji Williamson's offspring. But first, who is Peters and what of Persian Journal? The publication still exists, it seems, and appears to be one of those California-based expatriate-Iranian effusions.
The author of the article, Peters, pops up repeatedly on the Web as a stridently anti-Muslim voice "dedicated to the removal of the Islamic regime in Iran." So say his various posts, which gradually turn increasingly odd and even a little unhinged until, alarmingly, one finds the assertion that "Oba-Hussein is doing to America what Khomeini did to Iran"-- at which point one is tempted to cast the entire nest of hornets aside in disgust.
Yet one shouldn't. Peters, my Iranian friends tell me, is a U.K.-based, elderly, possibly half-Iranian British gent who lived in Iran for many years and is married to an Iranian. They say he has turned into a sensationalist and even fantasist in his later years -- but that he has done good work in the past. One gets the impression of a contradictory gentleman with increasingly showy and exaggerated opinions but with a past talent for dogged research.
Let us leave "Alan Peters" out of it for now. The hypothesis must stand or fall on its own merits. The story begins with Haji Williamson's Kashmiri wife. The official story goes that Khomeini's mother was said to be a Muslim of Indian descent. Of his father the official details are foggy but indicate a Persian Muslim living in Kashmir -- where Williamson often stayed. (Alan note: regularly vacationed to get away from the Persian Gulf heat).
Williamson was a devout Muslim and educated his kids in religious Shiite schools under top ayatollahs. (Alan note: Iraq's religious schools were the best and closest to him and happened to be Shia. Haji, himself, was a pure Sunni convert. Unlike his brothers, Khomeini failed the high level teaching standards in Iraq and was then sent to the Iranian city of Qom which had lower standards).
"Two of them," says the article, "Hindizadeh (meaning Indian born) and Passandieh (meaning pleasing or approved) studied well and eventually became ayatollahs in their own right. The third boy, a troublesome young man, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the holy city of Qom and studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under the rule of Reza Shah (the Shah's father) the young man chose the city of his residence (Qom or Khom) and took on the name of Khomeini." (Alan note: there is the tthe more widespread opinion that he lived in the Iranian town of Khomein and this became the origin of his name)
Williamson lived in Iran on and off between the World Wars and eventually got ejected by Reza Shah for working too closely with British oil interests. The article is so well-written and well-informed on the intricate regional history of the decades when the British ruled the Middle East and parts of Iran that--well, that it's hard to square such erudition with some of the views that the author, Alan Peters, seems to hold now. A detailed chronicle of Khomeini's early years follows, ending with his return to Iran after the Shah is unseated. Under the Shah, Khomeini was sentenced to death for his anti-monarchical views and given the title of ayatollah by clerics who wished to protect him from execution -- ayatollahs were exempt from the death sentence--who also abetted his escape from Iran.
(Alan note: as someone who knew General Pakravan , head of SAVAK - internal security - cross between the FBI AND CIA and his children on a personal level, the real story is that Ayatollah Shariatmadari, a strong supporter of the Shah, was worried that executing Khomeini would create a martyr and become a problem for the monarchy. General Pakravan came up with the idea to elevate the low level cleric to an ayatollah status and Shariatmadari helped with making this happen on the clerical level, He did not escape the country, he was formally exiled by Iranian courts).
Upon his return, Khomeini pointedly moved to kill off leading figures with knowledge of his past, indeed who helped him escape execution, including an Iranian senator (Alan note: who used his influence to obtain Iranian citizenship documents since Khomeini had no Iranian origin, nor Iranian blood in his veins - neither paternal nor maternal) and the Grand Ayatollah Shariatmadari. The senator had closely befriended Haji Williamson during his years in Iran. The Grand Ayatollah survived the hit but was placed under house arrest for many years. Documents pertaining to Khomeini's antecedents, according to the article, quickly disappeared or got changed during this time -- something I had heard mentioned over the years by other sources.
(Alan note: as did his lunatic religious writings - such as sexual instructions on bestial and pedophilian sex - scrubbed inside Iran where possessing Khomeini's early, written sayings now receives a death sentence!)
The article brings up other flimsier -- but cumulatively suggestive - - details such as Khomeini's dodgy Farsi accent and the testimony of a veteran British Petroleum operative (many such officials were also British intelligence agents) who had known Williamson well and refused to comment on Khomeini's parentage.
Documentation of births and deaths, generally, remained very iffy in many parts of the Islamic world well into the 1950s as empires crumbled into nation states, borders hardened, tribes were forcibly sedentarized, and new family names got adopted, so a theory like this is very easy to cook up -- but it is also just as likely to be true. My Iranian sources tell me that Khomeini's own grandson, Hossein Khomeini, who visited the U.S. once in 2003, feels that his grandfather's antecedents are distinctly foggy.*
What to make of it all? Why does it matter, if true? Here's why: Iranians struggle with a number of contradictory claims on their sense of identity: nationalism, Shiism, ethnic and tribal affiliations, wider Persian and farsophone continuums reaching into, say, Tajikistan and Afghanistan.
The mullahs (taazis) have tried to emphasize the Shiite and nationalist senses of identity but the two are not always in synch: many (Alan note: liberal, secularly inclined) Iranians, for example, have continued to revere (Alan: but not worship) various irreligious Persian poets of past millennia and picnic at their tombs. From the earliest Muslim-Persian era in the first millennium onwards, Persians have harbored a resentment of the Arabization of their ancient culture.
Iranians remember that soon after the 1979 Khomeini revolution, many of the security personnel at prisons and police stations were Arabs and other foreigners who'd been mysteriously imported to do the dirty work--from Lebanon and elsewhere. (Alan: currently Supreme Ruler Khamenei has imported over 5,000 felons from Palestinian prisons to kill and maim demonstrators). Similarly, we all know what Iranians think of British meddling in their history. So Khomeini's international antecedents touch on highly sensitive fault lines in the Iranian psyche.
The same goes for Ahmadinejad. Iranian Jews belong to one of the world's oldest Jewish communities. Most educated Iranians consider them so indigenous as to be native. But many ethnic nationalists or anti-Zionists don't.
Ironically, they are just the types who would make up the bulk of Ahmadinejad's followers. (I'm told that an aunt of Ahmadinejad lives in Haifa and has recently popped up in an Israeli newspaper outlining her family lineage.) According to my Iranian sources, two of the regime's scariest characters -- Elias Asgaroladi-Islami and Elias Eliasi -- are converted Jews who run the Motalefeh, a political party/goon squad with very bloody hands as shadowy paramilitary enforcers.
ISLAMIC REGIME BASSIJI SUPPRESSOR CONFESSES
BEHIND THE SCENES OF IRAN'S BLOODY REGIME
Live and learn - CLICK HERE Emphasis on 'live' (if you can)
Friday, December 18, 2009
IRAN SOLDIERS CROSS IRAQI BORDER TO SEIZE OIL WELLS
This may appear to be a minor event but not if you consider the timing and motive.
1. Following a declaration from Prince Reza Pahlavi, former Shah’s son, to Iran’s military to cease and desist from participating in the suppression of the student demonstrations, a positive result came from several units of the formal military (as opposed to the much better financed and equipped para-military Revolutionary Guard) who stated that if the Mullah regime did not stop harming the students they would have to face these units in opposition in the streets.
2. The reaction of the regime was to announce a national Red Alert (used when attacked by foreign invasion forces) and to recall all soldiers to their barracks immediately.
Once the regular army returned to barracks, heavily armed para-military Revolutionary Guard Forces forces surrounded those locations and forbade them to leave, in case they joined up with dissident protesters.
3. The dissidents have shown their ultimate disrespect of the regime by not only publicly burning large photos of Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei but also photos of bloodthirsty regime founder Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini, the “saint of saints”(?). And publicly tearing up posters of Khomeini in the streets.
Regime supporters then took the streets pretending to be dissidents and tore up posters of Khomeini to enrage those parts of the populace which still support President Ahmadi-Nejad and the Islamic regime.
They openly exhorted the bazaar to close down in protest to this insult of the regime's founder. To their shock, the bazaar refused to comply and stayed open thus in turn adding to the insult and showing support for the dissidents.
4. Unable to overcome the tenacious resistance of the demostrators, the regime wants to start a war. Their intent is to poke a finger in Iraqi and American eyes and force a beligerent reaction.
Then on a war footing they can announce martial law, a curfew to forbid anyone being in the streets except a couple of hours a day and give “plausible” orders to the suppression forces to shoot to kill because of an “at war” status.
So far reaction from Iraq and America has been “ho-hum”. And official American sources pretend not to know anything of the events.
The oil wells are in Faakeh, part of Iranian Ilam (Eelam) province, and is a long time Iranian territory but was over-run by the Iraqi armed forces during the eight year Iran-Iraq war.
What has now become a border dispute finds a source in the post-war agreement to resolve the dispute peacefully and that the oil revenue from the wells would be shared between the two countries till a border resolution came about - but Iraq had allegedly failed to pay Iran its share.
Sporadic armed forays by Islamic Iran on a small basis have taken place fairly often but this last one appears to be an incitement to trigger a major conflict.
America used to have an extensive listening post in this Faakeh area during the time of late Shah monitoring the region all the way to Israel.
What comes to mind is this could be used as a perfect excuse to deploy an attack on Iran by the West. Or even Israel, which is increasingly under pressure from surrounding nations where Lebanon has agreed to allow Hezbollah to possess military arms and weaponry.
Where Obama has an American general Keith Dayton and military specialists training Palestinian Special Forces to fight Israel.
Once trained by the U.S, the return of Fatah to terrorist activity against could place Israel on a collision course with Fatah’s American military advisers.
This could create a nightmare scenario of American military personnel caught in the crossfire between Israeli troops and Fatah terrorists.
The American consulate in Jerusalem has so far not commented on the fact that Fatah security forces, known as the al-Aqsa Brigades, are defined by American law as a terrorist entity and possibly are being inadvertently aided by the U.S. military.
http://www.thejerusalemgiftshop.com/israelnews/conflict/82-conflict/1141-american-general-keith-dayton-praises-fatah-soldiers-as-founders-of-palestinian-state.html
Where Syria has signed a war pact with Lebanon and thus Hezbollah and supplies arms to them to use against Israel.
This might be an ineffective spark or a dangerous one in a powder keg. We can only wait and see what reaction to this attack actually occurs.
1. Following a declaration from Prince Reza Pahlavi, former Shah’s son, to Iran’s military to cease and desist from participating in the suppression of the student demonstrations, a positive result came from several units of the formal military (as opposed to the much better financed and equipped para-military Revolutionary Guard) who stated that if the Mullah regime did not stop harming the students they would have to face these units in opposition in the streets.
2. The reaction of the regime was to announce a national Red Alert (used when attacked by foreign invasion forces) and to recall all soldiers to their barracks immediately.
Once the regular army returned to barracks, heavily armed para-military Revolutionary Guard Forces forces surrounded those locations and forbade them to leave, in case they joined up with dissident protesters.
3. The dissidents have shown their ultimate disrespect of the regime by not only publicly burning large photos of Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei but also photos of bloodthirsty regime founder Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini, the “saint of saints”(?). And publicly tearing up posters of Khomeini in the streets.
Regime supporters then took the streets pretending to be dissidents and tore up posters of Khomeini to enrage those parts of the populace which still support President Ahmadi-Nejad and the Islamic regime.
They openly exhorted the bazaar to close down in protest to this insult of the regime's founder. To their shock, the bazaar refused to comply and stayed open thus in turn adding to the insult and showing support for the dissidents.
4. Unable to overcome the tenacious resistance of the demostrators, the regime wants to start a war. Their intent is to poke a finger in Iraqi and American eyes and force a beligerent reaction.
Then on a war footing they can announce martial law, a curfew to forbid anyone being in the streets except a couple of hours a day and give “plausible” orders to the suppression forces to shoot to kill because of an “at war” status.
So far reaction from Iraq and America has been “ho-hum”. And official American sources pretend not to know anything of the events.
The oil wells are in Faakeh, part of Iranian Ilam (Eelam) province, and is a long time Iranian territory but was over-run by the Iraqi armed forces during the eight year Iran-Iraq war.
What has now become a border dispute finds a source in the post-war agreement to resolve the dispute peacefully and that the oil revenue from the wells would be shared between the two countries till a border resolution came about - but Iraq had allegedly failed to pay Iran its share.
Sporadic armed forays by Islamic Iran on a small basis have taken place fairly often but this last one appears to be an incitement to trigger a major conflict.
America used to have an extensive listening post in this Faakeh area during the time of late Shah monitoring the region all the way to Israel.
What comes to mind is this could be used as a perfect excuse to deploy an attack on Iran by the West. Or even Israel, which is increasingly under pressure from surrounding nations where Lebanon has agreed to allow Hezbollah to possess military arms and weaponry.
Where Obama has an American general Keith Dayton and military specialists training Palestinian Special Forces to fight Israel.
Once trained by the U.S, the return of Fatah to terrorist activity against could place Israel on a collision course with Fatah’s American military advisers.
This could create a nightmare scenario of American military personnel caught in the crossfire between Israeli troops and Fatah terrorists.
The American consulate in Jerusalem has so far not commented on the fact that Fatah security forces, known as the al-Aqsa Brigades, are defined by American law as a terrorist entity and possibly are being inadvertently aided by the U.S. military.
http://www.thejerusalemgiftshop.com/israelnews/conflict/82-conflict/1141-american-general-keith-dayton-praises-fatah-soldiers-as-founders-of-palestinian-state.html
Where Syria has signed a war pact with Lebanon and thus Hezbollah and supplies arms to them to use against Israel.
This might be an ineffective spark or a dangerous one in a powder keg. We can only wait and see what reaction to this attack actually occurs.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
MOSLEMS EXPRESSLY BLOCK MAIN STREET AND SIDEWALK "TO PRAY"
A thuggish, disruptive show of force by Islam in France in a public street. The cameraman was told if he continued to film he would encounter strong, unpleasant trouble and (implied) physical harm.
"Basically, the guy is video taping, so they start telling him to stop, then he says it's a public place, so he can film. They say that's not the case, and he needs permission to film them. This goes back and forth for quite some time.
Finally one of the guys says to the camera man, "Can I come to your house and film you?" Camera man replies, "No that would be illegal." Then the guys says, "OK then you can't film us here either." The camera man replies by saying, "This is a pubic street. I can film a public street.", etc.
Towards the end, there starts to be a little more aggression like, "Don't point that camera at me." kinda thing. They also said there's not a place nearby that these people can go to pray besides the street, so that's why they are there.
Basically, he wanted to document what they were doing by filming them, and they didn't want him to."
Moslems don't like to be indentified when they try to bully the countries in which they are alien guests - in case the country may finally have enough of it and bully them back. And have their faces breaking laws.
The camea man asks if they have a permit and they say they do not, they are part of a mosque and (for some reason) cannot pray there so they are choosing to do it here and sate he is forbidden to film them.
He asks by what law and they say they do not need a law to forbid him. It is enough that the the mosque to which they belong does not want them to be filmed.
Imposition of sharia mindsets on non-Moslems by force and physical thuggery. They had no permit to gather there and block passage for people and vehicles. But gave themselves pemission to ban other people their freedoms - like the cameraman.
Something similar happened in the USA at a Moslem Fair. The video of that is somewhere on this site. We post too many items to keep track. Do a search if you wish to view it.
"Basically, the guy is video taping, so they start telling him to stop, then he says it's a public place, so he can film. They say that's not the case, and he needs permission to film them. This goes back and forth for quite some time.
Finally one of the guys says to the camera man, "Can I come to your house and film you?" Camera man replies, "No that would be illegal." Then the guys says, "OK then you can't film us here either." The camera man replies by saying, "This is a pubic street. I can film a public street.", etc.
Towards the end, there starts to be a little more aggression like, "Don't point that camera at me." kinda thing. They also said there's not a place nearby that these people can go to pray besides the street, so that's why they are there.
Basically, he wanted to document what they were doing by filming them, and they didn't want him to."
Moslems don't like to be indentified when they try to bully the countries in which they are alien guests - in case the country may finally have enough of it and bully them back. And have their faces breaking laws.
The camea man asks if they have a permit and they say they do not, they are part of a mosque and (for some reason) cannot pray there so they are choosing to do it here and sate he is forbidden to film them.
He asks by what law and they say they do not need a law to forbid him. It is enough that the the mosque to which they belong does not want them to be filmed.
Imposition of sharia mindsets on non-Moslems by force and physical thuggery. They had no permit to gather there and block passage for people and vehicles. But gave themselves pemission to ban other people their freedoms - like the cameraman.
Something similar happened in the USA at a Moslem Fair. The video of that is somewhere on this site. We post too many items to keep track. Do a search if you wish to view it.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
ELECTION ABUSE IN IRAN - RIOTS CONTINUE
Coming to a city near you next year in USA elections? ACORN, SEIFU instead of Basiji? Thugs and czars of Oba-Hussein instead of Basijis? Probably without the rapes but physical clashes and beatings of protestors almost certain.
EXTREME SLIME LEVEL THUGGERY BY OBAMA MATCHES IRAN MULLAHS - WITHOUT THE BLOOD - YET
How desperate has the White House become to get anything passed under the name of health-care reform?
According to Michael Goldfarb’s source on Capitol Hill, the Obama administration has targeted the last remaining Democratic holdout, at least among moderates — and they’re willing to damage national security to extort his support. The White House has threatened Ben Nelson (D-NE) with the closure of Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska if he opposes Reid’s latest version, despite its status as the headquarters of US Strategic Command:
According to a Senate aide, the White House is now threatening to put Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list if Nelson doesn’t fall into line. Offutt Air Force Base employs some 10,000 military and federal employees in Southeastern Nebraska. As our source put it, this is a “naked effort by Rahm Emanuel and the White House to extort Nelson’s vote.”
They are “threatening to close a base vital to national security for what?” asked the Senate staffer. Indeed, Offutt is the headquarters for US Strategic Command, the successor to Strategic Air Command, and not by accident. STRATCOM was located in the middle of the country for strategic reasons. Its closure would be a massive blow to the economy of the state of Nebraska, but it would also be another example of this administration playing politics with our national security.
The Obama administration has little left to use for leverage. Why not national security? After all, if we’re going to bring terrorists into Illinois, what does it matter if we put the US Strategic Command on wheels for a few years?
One reason for the extortion attempt is that the latest version still hasn’t won any converts among the GOP. Susan Collins (R-ME), once considered a likely supporter of ObamaCare, announced today that the elimination of the public option and the Medicare buy-in isn’t enough to rescue the bill:
Today Collins told reporters that the bill under consideration in the Senate is “too deeply flawed for me to support it.”
“I don’t see voting for the current bill that is on the floor, even with the improvements that have been made,” Collins said. “I’m very leery of the impact of nearly $500 billion in Medicare cuts, particularly the cuts in home health care, which are completely counterproductive to the goal of lowering costs.”
Collins explained that she is continuing to work on the bill not because she intends to vote for it but because, “I think something is going to pass, and I would like to make that bill as good as possible, even if ultimately it’s not a bill that I can support.”
Collins’ colleague from Maine, Olympia Snowe, is not likely to contradict her, and no other Republicans will cast a vote for this monstrosity. Without the language prohibiting abortion funding, Nelson’s not likely to go for it, either, which leaves Reid at 59 votes — maybe.
He may face some rebellion from the progressive side of his caucus, several of whom pledged not to vote for a bill without any kind of public option. Getting Lieberman on board may wind up creating just another problem for Reid … unless the White House intends on threatening more base closures and disruption for national security.
According to Michael Goldfarb’s source on Capitol Hill, the Obama administration has targeted the last remaining Democratic holdout, at least among moderates — and they’re willing to damage national security to extort his support. The White House has threatened Ben Nelson (D-NE) with the closure of Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska if he opposes Reid’s latest version, despite its status as the headquarters of US Strategic Command:
According to a Senate aide, the White House is now threatening to put Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list if Nelson doesn’t fall into line. Offutt Air Force Base employs some 10,000 military and federal employees in Southeastern Nebraska. As our source put it, this is a “naked effort by Rahm Emanuel and the White House to extort Nelson’s vote.”
They are “threatening to close a base vital to national security for what?” asked the Senate staffer. Indeed, Offutt is the headquarters for US Strategic Command, the successor to Strategic Air Command, and not by accident. STRATCOM was located in the middle of the country for strategic reasons. Its closure would be a massive blow to the economy of the state of Nebraska, but it would also be another example of this administration playing politics with our national security.
The Obama administration has little left to use for leverage. Why not national security? After all, if we’re going to bring terrorists into Illinois, what does it matter if we put the US Strategic Command on wheels for a few years?
One reason for the extortion attempt is that the latest version still hasn’t won any converts among the GOP. Susan Collins (R-ME), once considered a likely supporter of ObamaCare, announced today that the elimination of the public option and the Medicare buy-in isn’t enough to rescue the bill:
Today Collins told reporters that the bill under consideration in the Senate is “too deeply flawed for me to support it.”
“I don’t see voting for the current bill that is on the floor, even with the improvements that have been made,” Collins said. “I’m very leery of the impact of nearly $500 billion in Medicare cuts, particularly the cuts in home health care, which are completely counterproductive to the goal of lowering costs.”
Collins explained that she is continuing to work on the bill not because she intends to vote for it but because, “I think something is going to pass, and I would like to make that bill as good as possible, even if ultimately it’s not a bill that I can support.”
Collins’ colleague from Maine, Olympia Snowe, is not likely to contradict her, and no other Republicans will cast a vote for this monstrosity. Without the language prohibiting abortion funding, Nelson’s not likely to go for it, either, which leaves Reid at 59 votes — maybe.
He may face some rebellion from the progressive side of his caucus, several of whom pledged not to vote for a bill without any kind of public option. Getting Lieberman on board may wind up creating just another problem for Reid … unless the White House intends on threatening more base closures and disruption for national security.
RADICALS BRAINWASHING OUR CHILDREN IN SCHOOL
1. Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle has just signed a bill into law that forces schools to teach the glories of organized labor and collective bargaining. Doyle has received significant campaign contributions from labor unions over the years prior to forcing their special interest agenda into the classroom.
Ever since unions have been involved in teaching, our system has spiraled into laughable mediocrity. It is what happens when you abandon actual education to turn children into racially-sensitive little environmentalists.
Teachers' unions even tried to have the fact that 9/11 was committed by Muslim extremists scrubbed from the history books.
Their effect on the economy has been equally crushing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.examiner.com/x-17412-Macon-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d16-Schools-forced-to-teach-labor-union-propaganda
A battle over religion is brewing in central Indiana after a public school wanted second graders to sing a song declaring, “Allah is God.” The phrase was removed just before the performance after a national conservative group launched a protest.
The principal of Lantern Road Elementary School in Fishers, IN, said they were trying to teach inclusiveness through their holiday production. It included references to Christmas, Hanukkah, Ramadan, Las Posadas and Kwanzaa. However, no other deity, other than Allah, was referenced in the show.
“It went off…without a hitch,” Danielle Thompson told the Indianapolis Star. “Several families thought it was a nice program.”
But others did not – especially David Hogan. His daughter came home with a copy of the lyrics just days before the production. Hogan, a Christian, told the American Family Association, a conservative advocacy group, that he was deeply concerned to learn that his daughter had been singing, “Allah is God.”
Here’s what the children were assigned to sing:
“Allah is God, we recall at dawn, Praying ‘til night during Ramadan At this joyful time we pray happiness for you, Allah be with you all your life through.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.foxnewsradio.com/2009/12/14/public-schoo-kids-singing-to-allah/#axzz0ZgJnGmk0
More....
Micah Clark, executive director of the Indiana AFA, launched an Internet protest once he heard about the allegations. “What surprised me here is that we’ve had a secular scrubbing of Christmas for so long and the school apparently didn’t see the problem with kids singing to Allah,” he told FOX News Radio. “You won’t even mention Jesus and you’re going to force my child to sing about Allah?
So they harass and persecute a kid who draws a picture of Jesus. They teach various kinds of sex in schools. Now this. Something is seriously wrong with the schools, and it’s called liberalism.
TAUNTON, Mass. (AP) — A Massachusetts man says his 8-year-old son was sent home from school and ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation after drawing a stick figure Jesus on a cross because the teacher thought it was too violent.
The man told the Taunton Daily Gazette for a story Tuesday his second-grader made the drawing Dec. 2 after his teacher asked children to sketch something that reminded them of Christmas.
The father, Chester Johnson, said on WBZ-TV that the teacher became upset when his son said he drew himself on the cross. Johnson says school officials overreacted.
The boy was cleared to return to school after the evaluation.
Superintendent Julie Hackett said she could not discuss an individual student and the school followed protocol.
Hackett didn’t return calls from The Associated Press on Tuesday.
LIBERAL OBA-HUSSEIN ADMINISTRATION LUNACY
Ever since unions have been involved in teaching, our system has spiraled into laughable mediocrity. It is what happens when you abandon actual education to turn children into racially-sensitive little environmentalists.
Teachers' unions even tried to have the fact that 9/11 was committed by Muslim extremists scrubbed from the history books.
Their effect on the economy has been equally crushing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.examiner.com/x-17412-Macon-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d16-Schools-forced-to-teach-labor-union-propaganda
A battle over religion is brewing in central Indiana after a public school wanted second graders to sing a song declaring, “Allah is God.” The phrase was removed just before the performance after a national conservative group launched a protest.
The principal of Lantern Road Elementary School in Fishers, IN, said they were trying to teach inclusiveness through their holiday production. It included references to Christmas, Hanukkah, Ramadan, Las Posadas and Kwanzaa. However, no other deity, other than Allah, was referenced in the show.
“It went off…without a hitch,” Danielle Thompson told the Indianapolis Star. “Several families thought it was a nice program.”
But others did not – especially David Hogan. His daughter came home with a copy of the lyrics just days before the production. Hogan, a Christian, told the American Family Association, a conservative advocacy group, that he was deeply concerned to learn that his daughter had been singing, “Allah is God.”
Here’s what the children were assigned to sing:
“Allah is God, we recall at dawn, Praying ‘til night during Ramadan At this joyful time we pray happiness for you, Allah be with you all your life through.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.foxnewsradio.com/2009/12/14/public-schoo-kids-singing-to-allah/#axzz0ZgJnGmk0
More....
Micah Clark, executive director of the Indiana AFA, launched an Internet protest once he heard about the allegations. “What surprised me here is that we’ve had a secular scrubbing of Christmas for so long and the school apparently didn’t see the problem with kids singing to Allah,” he told FOX News Radio. “You won’t even mention Jesus and you’re going to force my child to sing about Allah?
So they harass and persecute a kid who draws a picture of Jesus. They teach various kinds of sex in schools. Now this. Something is seriously wrong with the schools, and it’s called liberalism.
TAUNTON, Mass. (AP) — A Massachusetts man says his 8-year-old son was sent home from school and ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation after drawing a stick figure Jesus on a cross because the teacher thought it was too violent.
The man told the Taunton Daily Gazette for a story Tuesday his second-grader made the drawing Dec. 2 after his teacher asked children to sketch something that reminded them of Christmas.
The father, Chester Johnson, said on WBZ-TV that the teacher became upset when his son said he drew himself on the cross. Johnson says school officials overreacted.
The boy was cleared to return to school after the evaluation.
Superintendent Julie Hackett said she could not discuss an individual student and the school followed protocol.
Hackett didn’t return calls from The Associated Press on Tuesday.
LIBERAL OBA-HUSSEIN ADMINISTRATION LUNACY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
