Saturday, December 15, 2007

COMMON USA REVERSE DISCRIMINATION IN RACE & RELIGION


The animals, pictured below the photo of the victims, car-jacked, then raped Christopher Newsom, cut off his penis, then set him on fire and fatally shot him several times while they forced his girlfriend, Channon Christian, to watch.

An even more cruel fate awaited her!

Channon Christian, was beaten and gang-raped in many ways for four days by all of them, while they took turns urinating on her.

Then they cut off her breast and put chemicals in her mouth ... and then murdered her.

Where "be" the Revs Al and Jesse?

Are they providing counsel and help to the families of the victims?

Of course not - the victims were white.

Why hasn't this received extended National coverage by the news media like the Duke "rape" case?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white.

Why hasn't the NAACP, ACLU, New York Times etc, called for an investigation?


Must be cause the victims were white.

Why hasn't the FBI been called in to investigate this as a hate crime?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white.

Alan note: Is this the same double standard that makes the Democrats and liberals, who scream at so-called injustice and then ignore it, also do the same with virulent Islamic jihad?

To appease it as they do with black reverse racism?

Or is it that there are enough black "muslims" inside the USA as voters or political power groups, resembling these animals, to provide an umbrella of fear for the jihadists - just as they do for their counterparts in the USA?

Islam quite simply preaches to kill or enslave anyone who differs with them. Even violently.

Other than being different, what did this white couple ever do to the black group who so violated them?

What makes our Congress forbid Christmas but in abject "dhimmitude" promote Islam's Ramadan?

U.S. Rep Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

Only weeks after voting for a resolution that "recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world," nine Democrats in the U.S. House refused to vote for a Christmas resolution that condemns the worldwide persecution of Christians.

U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., was on the list of those who endorsed the statement recognizing Islam, but refused to support the Christmas resolution that noted the holiday "is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and around the world."

The Christmas resolution, like the Ramadan resolution, decried the violencethat targets religion around the world.

A spokesman for DeGette said her vote was because the Ramadan resolution which she endorsed, was about "rejecting religious extremism and promotingof religious tolerance."

OH SURE !!! SHE WENT TO POLITICANS SCHOOL TO COME OUT WITH THIS ASSHOLE STATEMENT. Islam is not religiously extreme?

.The spokesman, Chris Aaron, however, said DeGette is a "strong supporter of separation of church and state and her view was that Congress should not favor one religion over another. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT SHE DID!!!!!!!!

Alan note: Does THIS FEMALE DHIMMIE not realize that in Islam the religion IS the State? And any separation is against the word of Allah and punishable by death?


"She felt this resolution (recognizing Christmas and condemning persecutionof Christians) promoted Christianity over other religions," he added.

Other Democrats who supported the acknowledgment of Islam's Ramadan but refused a similar recognition for Christianity's Christmas included:


GaryAckerman and Yvette Clarke of N.Y.,
Alcee Hastings, Fla.,
Barbara Lee, Fortney Stark and Lynn Woolsey, Calif.,
Jim McDermott, Wash., and
RobertScott, Va.

Both resolutions, carrying similar wording, ultimately were approved. But the American Family Association of Pennsylvania also raised the issue of representatives supporting Ramadan, but refusing to offer the same supportfor Christmas.

"We are very pleased that 17 of our 19 congressmen voted to recognize the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith.

Congressman John Murtha was one of 40 who did NOT vote ( A REAL CHICKEN S--T FOR SURE ) and unfortunately Congresswoman Allyson Schwartzd ecided to simply vote 'present' rather than take a stand on such a controversial issue as Christmas," said Diane Gramley, president.

She noted on Oct. 2, Schwartz "did not hesitate" to vote for a resolution to support the religion "of the 19 hijackers of 9/11 who brought down the World Trade Center, flew their airliner/missile into the Pentagon, and caused the death of the crew and passengers of Flight 93 as it crashed into a field outside Shanksville, Pa."

"I believe there are more Christians in her district than Muslims and they deserve an explanation for her vote last night," Gramley said.

According to Liberty Counsel, the Christmas resolution was approved with nine "no" votes. Ten others voted "present" and 40 refused to vote at all.

"Amazingly, all but two of the representatives who answered "present" or voted against the Christmas resolution voted in favor of a resolution recognizing Ramadan, even though much of the language was similar," the group said.

The Ramadan resolution began: Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and

Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramandan commenced at dusk on September 13, 2007, and continues for one lunar month: …

"The Christmas resolution started: Whereas Christmas, a holiday of great significance to Americans and many other cultures and nationalities, is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and the world...

Whereas on December 25 of each calendar year, American Christians observe Christmas, the holiday celebrating the birth of their savior, Jesus Christ...

Whereas many Christians and non-Christians throughout the United States and the rest ofthe world, celebrate Christmas as a time to serve others:

"The Ramadan resolution then acknowledged "the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world," expressed "friendship and support for Muslims" noted "the onset of Ramadan," and rejected "hatred, bigotry, and violence directed against Muslims."

It also "commends Muslims … who have privatelyand publicly rejected interpretations and movements of Islam that justify and encourage hatred."

The Christmas resolution continued to acknowledge "the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world," expressed "continued support for Christians," noted the historical importance of Christmas, the role "played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States," and rejected "bigotry and persecution directed against Christians, both in theUnited States and worldwide."

"Notice that the Christmas resolution uses similar language. It is astonishing that those who supported the Ramadan Resolution would vote against the Christmas Resolution," Liberty Counsel said.

The group suggested voters check the lists for votes by their representatives. "If they voted against Christmas and in favor of Ramadan, respectfully point out their hypocrisy," the group said.

Concerned Women for America said the true message of Christmas is under assault in the U.S.

Shari Rendall, director of the group's legislation and public policy divisions, noted Congress earlier approved not only the endorsement of Ramadan but also another resolution concern the Hindu religion.

"It astounds me that any member of Congress would oppose legislation that recognizes the important of Christmas in our country, particularly in light of the fact that earlier this year Congress passed two separate resolutions honoring the Hindu and Islamic religions…"

3 comments:

Right Truth said...

Excellent comparison. I wondered the same thing about Jessie and Al. You might be interested in an article I read at Wake Up America, "This Careful Generation".

http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/12/this-careful-generation.html

Debbie Hamilton
Right Truth

Mark In Irvine said...

"The animals, pictured below the photo of the victims, ..."

Are these guys Americans? In What city? Are they Muslim? Did this happen in the US or in Iraq or in some other place? Are they in custody? What are their names? [I note you didn't call them "alleged perpetrators" - has there been some trial yet?] I'm not sure what "good" is done at this point by blaming anyone other than these specific guys for any of this. I doubt that anybody, even Al or Jesse, will argue that these guys should be treated lightly for this [remember, the Constitution requires a trial before we "convict" them in the court of public opinion]. If you can provide more information about this, maybe we can pressure our local media to talk about this. Thanks.

Miriam Malang said...

Oh my god..I am currently creating campaigns on racism in college..I hate racism..I cant believe they had the heart to do something like that to another human being..Were all flesh and blood..How could they..Its just horrible..