Suddenly Obama is talking about attacking Iran!
TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE AND ALWAYS WRONG!
Showing posts with label OBAMA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OBAMA. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
SAUDIS NO LONGER SUPPORTING OBAMA POLICIES
http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/07/saudi-confidence-in-usa-vanishing-as-is.html
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
MUST VIEW! MUST VIEW! MUST VIEW! While sarcastic, VERY informative.
Glenn Beck details the treachery and probable treason of our enemy within, the USURPER in the Oval Office (also see Supreme Court precedent article here below this one).
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS VIDEO!
(Note how on the White House site they changed the word "laughter" to "applause" when Obama claimed he had created 2.1 million new PRIVATE SECTOR jobs! And was laughed at.
 |
| BAD GUY FOR USA! |
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS VIDEO!
(Note how on the White House site they changed the word "laughter" to "applause" when Obama claimed he had created 2.1 million new PRIVATE SECTOR jobs! And was laughed at.
Saturday, May 07, 2011
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
NOT ONLY DISSED BY THE BRITISH ROYALS BUT FACING THE SUPREMES (COURT)
INVITATION DEFINITELY NOT COMING TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
though 1,900 other guests, including many Africans, will attend the party,
leaving no place for the "racism" comments from the Obama leftists.
READ MORE
With Her Majesty’s reported orders about Michelle Obama, I cannot see the Obama clan risking the certain indignity of “arriving” uninvited.
(As some apparently think they might WANT to try)
Good and gracious manners still count for a lot in worldwide high society (little of it to still be found in the USA as we are not socially structured along the classical paths and our “high society” is not based on long standing family background, education, service to our country and cultural upbringing but our "nobility" or "upper class" is based on how much money they have in the bank or happen to be an unpolished, sometimes barely educated but popular movie, sports or music star.
(Or a lying, thuggish, CLUELESS Community Organizer (now millionaire), whom even Venezuela's thug, Hugo Chavez, verbally disrespects and Iran's Ahmadi-Nejad mocks in a speech as "not knowing his own name". Low life seems an appropriate characterization.
AND NOW THE SUPREME COURT IS TAKING ANOTHER LOOK AT HIS RIGHT TO OCCUPY THE WHITE HOUSE!
===============================================
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
Stunner!
Supremes to give eligibility case another look - Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
By Bob Unruh
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Alan Note: The UNCONSITUTIONAL consideration that hearing the case and probably having to rule against Oba-Hussein (argument also used by Clinton appointed Federal District Judge David Carter to avoid allowing the case to proceed on merit) would create a national crisis pales in the face of the destruction of America happening under his illegal and illegitimate presence in the Oval Office.
From which the Supreme Court has a duty to protect us! But has so far avoided as shown in the video!
Read full article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=264897
Sunday, February 13, 2011
FINALLY SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT FOR THE SHAH
Finally someone speaks up for the late Shah!
Iran’s Shah had no special interest in monetary wealth
Published: February 8 2011
From Mr Robert F. Armao.
Sir, I am writing to correct inaccuracies in “Reforms focus on recovering rogue leaders’ assets” (January 26).
The graphic asserts that the late Shah of Iran stole Iranian government assets valued at $35bn and that the US froze assets of the Shah valued at $20m.
The reported gross revenues of the government of Iran during the reign of the Shah were approximately $120bn, with disbursements for defence, social welfare and infrastructure, making it impossible that $35bn was directed solely to the Shah.
In an effort to vilify the Shah, representatives and supporters of the Islamic Republic have continued to increase the value of the assets of the Shah and his family. Based on the fact that the Islamic government had all the original financial records of the Shah’s government, they were well aware that no such assets were removed from Iran during the Shah’s reign.
This despite the fact no such funds were ever located – even after the use of forensic accountants and other investigators – in any country. The Shah, his family and related entities prevailed in each legal action (including the US and Switzerland) initiated by the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Islamic Republic has consistently maintained that the multi-billion US dollar assets of the Pahlavi Foundation of Iran are, in fact, owned by the Shah of Iran and his family.
In fact, the Pahlavi Foundation was controlled by the government of Iran and then the Islamic Republic, and remains so today.
Before his departure from Iran in 1979 and through to the end of his life, I served as senior adviser to the Shah and to his family. I can attest to the fact that the Shah had no particular interest in monetary wealth. His life-long concern was for the well-being of the citizens of Iran.
Robert F. Armao,
New York, NY, US
ALAN NOTE: As someone who also had access to some confidential royal information, the late-Shah had $90 Million (with an M not a B) of personal funds (through legal personal overseas investments over decades) on hand when he left Iran and considering the DAILY expenses of some $10,000 on security, staff etc., this does not go a long way and makes his millionaire status rather a "poor man level" compared to the millionaires who abound.
He could have transfered about $3.5 BILLION of the Pahlavi Foundation funds to himself overseas but refused to touch it saying the money belonged to the Iranian people, even though the funds came about and grew through his good judgement calls in investing it for the nation.
Obama insists those who hate him (Obama) do so because they not know him. For those of us who knew the late Shah, this applies forcefully and those who criticized the Shah knew very little of his aspirations to bring Iran into the modern world and his actions to achieve this.
I remember openly confronting Prime Minister Amir Abbas Hoveyda, a friend of mine, with not sharing the improvements His Majesty and he had brought into being over the 13-years that Hoveyda had held his post, leaving the populace totally in the dark of the immense progress the country was enjoying.
With typical Aquarian (February 18th) lofty idealism, he replied: "we are doing what we are supposed to be doing and it is not the role of the government to blow its own trumpet".
Sadly this lack of public information made opposing the Marxist-Islamic Soviet -Khomeini uprising virtually impossible for those of us who tried. There was almost no tangible previously shared information available to counter the lies and disinformation used against the Monarchy.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
DETAILS PRO & CON POLARIK - must read
Just as Dr. Polarik, an SME (subject matter expert) went into great detail to demonstrate Obama's proffered "Certification of LIve Birth" (not Certificate) was bogus, he also went into equal detail to show how a detractor on Obama's spin team, falsely tried to nay-say and obfuscate the facts with lie after lie. Great read for anyone who wants ALL the details about the Obama "document". To save space and facilitate reading, graphics in Dr. Polarik's documents have the HTML code instead of the actual graphics. To view them copy and paste the links into your browser. DEC 02 FULL DETAILS DEC 18 FULL DETAILS
Sunday, November 23, 2008
VERY, VERY DETAILED FINAL ANALYSIS ON BC/COLB STATUS BY PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENT EXPERT
PROLOGUE:
In this Supreme Court case, decided the year Obama was born, on the question of citizenship, not "natural born citizenship," the Court held:
Petitioner's mother is a native-born citizen of the United States, and his father is an Italian citizen who has never been naturalized.
They were married in the United States, and their marital relationship has never been terminated.
Petitioner was born in Italy in 1906, while his parents were residing there temporarily, and his mother brought him to the United States later in the same year.
He has since resided continuously in the United States, and has never been naturalized.
Held: Petitioner is NOT a citizen of the United States. Pp. 366 U. S. 309-315.
========
IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
